1
|
Al-Rashdan A. In Regard to Laughlin et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:304. [PMID: 38631741 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulla Al-Rashdan
- Dalhousie University School of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vargas CE, Laughlin BS. In Reply to Al-Rashdan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:305-306. [PMID: 38631742 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Brady S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Diao K, Lei X, He W, Jagsi R, Giordano SH, Smith GL, Caudle A, Shen Y, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Long-Term Adverse Radiation Therapy Effects Among Breast Cancer Survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:626-631. [PMID: 37751792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast and skin changes are underrecognized side effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer, which may have long-term implications for quality of life (QOL). Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, including long-term QOL differences after breast radiation therapy, are poorly understood. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of patients from the Texas Cancer Registry who received diagnoses of stage 0-II breast cancer from 2009 to 2014 and treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy; 2770 patients were sampled and 631 responded (23%). The BREAST-Q Adverse Effects of Radiation overall score and subindices measured the effect of radiation therapy on breast tissue. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations of demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes. RESULTS The median age was 57 years (IQR, 48-65), median time from diagnosis to survey response 9 years (IQR, 7-10), and the cohort included 62 Asian American or Pacific Islander (9.8%), 11 American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN) (1.7%), 161 Black (25.5%), 144 Hispanic (22.8%), and 253 White (40.1%) patients. Mean BREAST-Q Adverse Effects of Radiation score was worse for AIAN patients (-22.2; 95% CI, -39.9 to -4.6; P = .01), Black patients (-10.8; 95% CI, -16.1 to -5.5; P < .001), and Hispanic patients (-7.8; 95% CI, -13.0 to -2.5; P = .004) compared with White patients, age <50 compared with ≥65 (effect size -8.6; 95% CI, -14.0 to -3.2; P = .002), less than a college education (-5.8; 95% CI, -10.0 to -1.6; P = .01), bra cup size of D/E versus A/B (-5.3; 95% CI, -9.9 to -0.65; P = .03), and current smokers (-11.3; 95% CI, -18.3 to -4.2; P = .002). AIAN, Black, and Hispanic patients reported worse changes in skin pigmentation, telangiectasias, dryness, soreness, and/or irritation compared with White patients. CONCLUSIONS AIAN, Black, and Hispanic patients reported substantially worse long-term breast and skin QOL outcomes after radiation therapy. Additional work is needed to understand these differences and how to alleviate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Weiguo He
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abigail Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yeager KA, Rosa WE, Belcher SM, Lee SM, Lee H, Bruner DW, Meghani SH. A Qualitative Study of the Pain Experience of Black Individuals With Cancer Taking Long-Acting Opioids. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:E73-E83. [PMID: 36737858 PMCID: PMC10400728 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the experience of Black individuals with cancer taking long-acting opioids for cancer pain. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the day-to-day experience of living with pain and the experiences of taking opioids for pain management among Black individuals with cancer prescribed with long-acting opioids. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study was part of a larger investigation focused on opioid adherence. Participants (N = 14) were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Analysis followed conventional content analysis and constant comparison approaches. Sociodemographics, clinical information, and the Brief Pain Inventory form were collected. RESULTS The majority of the subsample was female (64.3%), not married (78.6%), and with a median age of 52.5 years. Participants were taking either MS Contin (85.7%) or OxyContin (14.3%). The Brief Pain Inventory median "average" pain severity scores and pain interference scores were 5.1/10 (interquartile range [IQR] = 6.1) and 3.5/10 (IQR = 6.7), respectively. Three themes are reported from the analyses: desire for control, barriers to pain relief, and isolation versus connectedness. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the persistent nature of moderate to severe cancer pain and how pain and its treatment interfere with patients' lives. The findings describe ways that patients learn to manage and exert control over pain despite conflicting attitudes and dealing with opioid stigma. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE Clinicians should partner with patients with cancer, especially people of color, who may experience intersecting stigmas related to their cancer pain and opioid use, to best provide an individualized and culturally sensitive pain treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Yeager
- Author Affiliations: Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (Drs Bruner, Yeager, and H. Lee and Ms S. Lee); Winship Cancer Institute (Drs Bruner and Yeager); Office of the Senior Vice President for Research (Dr Bruner), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Dr Rosa), New York, New York; School of Nursing (Dr Belcher); Palliative Research Center (Dr Belcher), University of Pittsburgh; Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Dr Belcher), Pennsylvania; and Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania (Dr Meghani), Philadelphia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dejonckheere CS, Layer JP, Nour Y, Layer K, Glasmacher A, Wiegreffe S, Fuhrmann A, Caglayan L, Grau F, Sarria GR, Scafa D, Koch D, Heimann M, Leitzen C, Köksal MA, Röhner F, Müdder T, Dejonckheere E, Schmeel FC, Anzböck T, Lindner K, Bachmann A, Abramian A, Kaiser C, Faridi A, Mustea A, Giordano FA, Stope MB, Schmeel LC. Non-invasive physical plasma for preventing radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: Results from an intrapatient-randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100699. [PMID: 38021092 PMCID: PMC10654149 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose To investigate the effect of topical non-invasive physical plasma (NIPP), a volatile mix generated out of ambient air, on prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (RD) during and after whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Materials and Methods Lateral and medial breast halves were randomised within each patient to receive either 120 s of NIPP or sham treatment daily during WBI. Standard skin care with urea lotion was applied to the whole breast. Blinded acute skin toxicity was assessed weekly for each breast half separately and included clinician- (CTCAE) and patient-reported (modified RISRAS), and objective (spectrophotometry) assessments. As an additional external control, a comparable standard of care (SoC) patient collective from a previous prospective trial was used. Results Sixty-four patients were included. There were no significant differences between breast halves. Post-hoc comparison with a similar SoC control collective revealed OR = 0.28 (95% CI 0.11-0.76; p = 0.014) for grade ≥ 2 RD upon WBI completion, along with less hyperpigmentation (p < 0.001), oedema (p = 0.020), dry (p < 0.001) and moist desquamation (p = 0.017), pain, itching, and burning (p < 0.001 for each). Tolerability of NIPP was excellent and side effects were not observed. Conclusion Even though there were no differences between intrapatient-randomised breast halves, the overall incidence and severity of acute radiation-induced skin toxicity were considerably lower when compared to a prospectively collected SoC cohort. Our data suggest the potential benefit of NIPP in RD prevention. A randomised trial with a physical control group is warranted to confirm these promising results (DRKS00026225).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julian Philipp Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Younèss Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Shari Wiegreffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Arne Fuhrmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Lara Caglayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Franziska Grau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Martina Heimann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Ali Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Fred Röhner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Egon Dejonckheere
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 5037 Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Teresa Anzböck
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Kira Lindner
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Anne Bachmann
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Alina Abramian
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Kaiser
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Andree Faridi
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank Anton Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Bernhard Stope
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parikh RB, Schriver E, Ferrell WJ, Wakim J, Williamson J, Khan N, Kopinsky M, Balachandran M, Gabriel PE, Schuchter LM, Patel MS, Shulman LN, Manz CR. Remote Patient-Reported Outcomes and Activity Monitoring to Improve Patient-Clinician Communication Regarding Symptoms and Functional Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:1143-1151. [PMID: 37816198 PMCID: PMC10732505 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Routine collection of patient-generated health data (PGHD) may promote earlier recognition of symptomatic and functional decline. This trial assessed the impact of an intervention integrating remote PGHD collection with patient nudges on symptom and functional status understanding between patients with advanced cancer and their oncology team. METHODS This three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 19, 2020, to December 17, 2021, at a large tertiary oncology practice. We enrolled patients with stage IV GI and lung cancers undergoing chemotherapy. Over 6 months, patients in two intervention arms received PROStep-weekly text message-based symptom surveys and passive activity monitoring using a wearable accelerometer. PGHD were summarized in dashboards given to patients' oncology team before appointments. One intervention arm received an additional text-based active choice prompt to discuss worsening symptoms or functional status with their clinician. Control patients did not receive PROStep. The coprimary outcomes patient perceptions of oncology team symptom and functional understanding at 6 months were measured on a 1-5 Likert scale (5 = high understanding). RESULTS One hundred eight patients enrolled: 55% male, 81% White, and 77% had GI cancers. Patient-reported clinician understanding did not differ between control and intervention arms for symptoms (4.5 v 4.5; P = .87) or functional status (4.5 v 4.3; P = .31). In the intervention arms, combined patient adherence to weekly symptom reports and daily activity monitoring was 64% and 53%, respectively. Intervention patients in the PROStep versus PROStep + active choice arms reported low burden from wearing the accelerometer (mean burden [standard deviation], 2.7 [1.3] v 2.1 [1.3]; P = .15) and completing surveys (2.1 [1.2] v 1.9 [1.3]; P = .44). CONCLUSION Patients receiving PROStep reported high understanding of symptoms and functional status from their oncology team, although this did not differ from controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi B. Parikh
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily Schriver
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Penn Medicine Predictive Healthcare, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William J. Ferrell
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jonathan Wakim
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joelle Williamson
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Neda Khan
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Center for Health Care Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael Kopinsky
- Center for Health Care Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Peter E. Gabriel
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lynn M. Schuchter
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Christopher R. Manz
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vermeille M, Koster KL, Benzaquen D, Champion A, Taussky D, Kaulanjan K, Früh M. A Literature Review of Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Research. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9886-9894. [PMID: 37999138 PMCID: PMC10670533 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent awareness of institutional racism, there are still important racial disparities in prostate cancer medical research. We investigated the historical development of research on racial disparities and bias. METHODS PubMed was searched for the term 'prostate cancer race' and added key terms associated with racial disparity. As an indicator of scientific interest in the topic, we analyzed whether the number of publications increased linearly as an indicator of growing interest. The linearity is expressed as R2. RESULTS The general search term "prostate cancer race" yielded 4507 publications. More specific search terms with ≥12 publications showing a higher scientific interest were found after 2005. The terms with the most publications when added to the general term were "genetic" (n = 1011), "PSA" (n = 995), and "detection" (n = 861). There was a linear increase in publications for "prostate cancer race" (R2 = 0.75) since 1980. Specific terms added to the general terms with a high linear increase (R2 ≥ 0.7) were "screening" (R2 = 0.82), "detection" (R2 = 0.72), "treatment access" (R2 = 0.71), and "trial underrepresentation" (R2 = 0.71). However, only a few studies have investigated its association with sexual activity. A combination with "sexual" showed 157 publications but only two years with ≥12 publications/year. CONCLUSION The terms "genetic", "PSA", and "detection" have been the focus of recent research on racial differences in prostate cancer. We found that old stereotypes are still being mentioned but seem to find little interest in the current literature. Further research interest was found in "treatment access". Recently, interest in socioeconomic factors has decreased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Vermeille
- Genolier Swiss Radio-Oncology Network, Clinique de Genolier, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland;
| | - Kira-Lee Koster
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.-L.K.); (M.F.)
| | - David Benzaquen
- Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de La Tour, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland; (D.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Ambroise Champion
- Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de La Tour, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland; (D.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de La Tour, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland; (D.B.); (A.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3Y2V4, Canada
| | - Kevin Kaulanjan
- Department of Urology, Université des Antilles, CHU de Guadeloupe, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France;
| | - Martin Früh
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.-L.K.); (M.F.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alger E, Minchom A, Lee Aiyegbusi O, Schipper M, Yap C. Statistical methods and data visualisation of patient-reported outcomes in early phase dose-finding oncology trials: a methodological review. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 64:102228. [PMID: 37781154 PMCID: PMC10541462 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, within dose-finding clinical trials, treatment toxicity and tolerability are assessed by clinicians. Research has shown that clinician reporting may have inadequate inter-rater reliability, poor correlation with patient reported outcomes, and under capture the true toxicity burden. The introduction of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), where the patient can assess their own symptomatic adverse events or quality of life, has potential to complement current practice to aid dose optimisation. There are no international recommendations offering guidance for the inclusion of PROs in dose-finding trial design and analysis. Our review aimed to identify and describe current statistical methods and data visualisation techniques employed to analyse and visualise PRO data in published early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs). Methods DFOTs published from June 2016-December 2022, which presented PRO analysis methods, were included in this methodological review. We extracted 35 eligible papers indexed in PubMed. Study characteristics extracted included: PRO objectives, PRO measures, statistical analysis and visualisation techniques, and whether the PRO was involved in interim and final dose selection decisions. Findings Most papers (30, 85.7%) did not include clear PRO objectives. 20 (57.1%) papers used inferential statistical techniques to analyse PROs, including survival analysis and mixed-effect models. One trial used PROs to classify a clinicians' assessed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Three (8.6%) trials used PROs to confirm the tolerability of the recommended dose. 25 trial reports visually presented PRO data within a figure or table within their publication, of which 12 papers presented PRO score longitudinally. Interpretation This review highlighted that the statistical methods and reporting of PRO analysis in DFOTs are often poorly described and inconsistent. Many trials had PRO objectives which were not clearly described, making it challenging to evaluate the appropriateness of the statistical techniques used. Drawing conclusions based on DFOTs which are not powered for PROs may be misleading. With no guidance and standardisation of analysis methods for PROs in early phase DFOTs, it is challenging to compare study findings across trials. Therefore, there is a crucial need to establish international guidance to enhance statistical methods and graphical presentation for PRO analysis in the dose-finding setting. Funding EA has been supported to undertake this work as part of a PhD studentship from the Institute of Cancer Research within the MRC/NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership. AM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, the Institute of Cancer Research and Imperial College.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Alger
- Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Anna Minchom
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthew Schipper
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christina Yap
- Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Purswani JM, Bigham Z, Adotama P, Oh C, Xiao J, Maisonet O, Teruel JR, Gutierrez D, Tattersall IW, Perez CA, Gerber NK. Risk of Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Skin of Color Who Undergo Radiation to the Breast or Chest Wall With and Without Regional Nodal Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:468-478. [PMID: 37060928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is common after radiation therapy for breast cancer, with data indicating that ARD may disproportionately affect Black or African American (AA) patients. We evaluated the effect of skin of color (SOC) on physician-reported ARD in patients treated with radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified patients treated with whole breast or chest wall ± regional nodal irradiation or high tangents using 50 Gy in 25 fractions from 2015 to 2018. Baseline skin pigmentation was assessed using the Fitzpatrick scale (I = light/pale white to VI = black/very dark brown) with SOC defined as Fitzpatrick scale IV to VI. We evaluated associations among SOC, physician-reported ARD, late hyperpigmentation, and use of oral and topical treatments for RD using multivariable models. RESULTS A total of 325 patients met eligibility, of which 40% had SOC (n = 129). On multivariable analysis, Black/AA race and chest wall irradiation had a lower odds of physician-reported grade 2 or 3 ARD (odds ratio [OR], 0.110; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.030-0.397; P = .001; OR, 0.377; 95% CI, 0.161-0.883; P = .025), whereas skin bolus (OR, 8.029; 95% CI, 3.655-17.635; P = 0) and planning target volume D0.03cc (OR, 1.001; 95% CI, 1.000-1.001; P = .028) were associated with increased odds. On multivariable analysis, SOC (OR, 3.658; 95% CI, 1.236-10.830; P = .019) and skin bolus (OR, 26.786; 95% CI, 4.235-169.432; P = 0) were associated with increased odds of physician-reported late grade 2 or 3 hyperpigmentation. There was less frequent use of topical steroids to treat ARD and more frequent use of oral analgesics in SOC versus non-SOC patients (43% vs 63%, P < .001; 50% vs 38%, P = .05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Black/AA patients exhibited lower odds of physician-reported ARD. However, we found higher odds of late hyperpigmentation in SOC patients, independent of self-reported race. These findings suggest that ARD may be underdiagnosed in SOC when using the physician-rated scale despite this late evidence of radiation-induced skin toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhi M Purswani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zahna Bigham
- Tufts University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Prince Adotama
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Cheongeun Oh
- Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julie Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Olivier Maisonet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jose R Teruel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Gutierrez
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Ian W Tattersall
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Carmen A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Naamit K Gerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mushonga M, LaVigne AW, Alcorn SR. Improving Characterization and Management of Acute Radiation Skin Toxicity Across Skin Tones in Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:479-481. [PMID: 37652610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Mushonga
- Queens University, Department of Oncology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Department of Oncology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; University of Zimbabwe, Department of Oncology, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Anna W LaVigne
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sara R Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ghaffar A, Xie Y, Antinozzi P, Ryan Wolf J. RISREAC Study: Assessment of Cutaneous Radiation Injury Through Clinical Documentation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2023; 17:e486. [PMID: 37680193 DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2023.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation dermatitis (RD) occurs in 95% of patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for cancer treatment, affecting 800 million patients annually. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of developing a historical RD cohort, Radiation Induced Skin Reactions (RISREAC) cohort. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated RD-related clinical documentation for 245 breast cancer patients who received RT at the University of Rochester Medical Center, to understand the RD progression, scoring, and management. All statistical analyses were performed at 0.05 level of significance. RESULTS Clinician-documented RD severity was observed for 169 (69%) patients with a mean severity of 1.57 [1.46, 1.68]. The mean descriptor-based severity score of 2.31 [2.18, 2.45] moderately correlated (r = 0.532, P < 0.0001) with documented RD grade. Most patients (91.8%) received skin care treatment during RT, with 66.7% receiving more than 2 modalities. CONCLUSIONS The RISREAC cohort is the first retrospective cohort established from clinical documentation of radiation-induced skin changes for the study of RD and cutaneous radiation injury (CRI). RD symptom descriptors were more reliably documented and suitable for all skin types compared to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) or Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades. A new descriptor-based scoring tool would be useful for RD and CRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aqsa Ghaffar
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Yunna Xie
- Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Julie Ryan Wolf
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Check DK, Jones KF, Fish LJ, Dinan MA, Dunbar TK, Farley S, Ma J, Merlin JS, O'Regan A, Oeffinger KC. Clinician Perspectives on Managing Chronic Pain After Curative-Intent Cancer Treatment. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e484-e491. [PMID: 36595729 PMCID: PMC10530392 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Among cancer survivors who have completed curative-intent treatment, the high prevalence and adverse consequences of chronic pain are well documented. Yet, research on clinicians' experiences with and perspectives on managing chronic pain among cancer survivors is critically lacking. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with 17 clinicians (six oncology, three palliative care, and eight primary care) affiliated with an academic medical center. Interview questions addressed clinicians' experiences with and perspectives on managing chronic pain (with or without opioid therapy) during the transition from active treatment to survivorship. A multidisciplinary team conducted content analysis of interview transcripts to identify and refine themes related to current practices and challenges in managing chronic pain in this context. RESULTS Overall, clinicians perceived chronic pain to be relatively uncommon among cancer survivors. Identified challenges included a lack of clarity about which clinician (or clinicians) are best positioned to manage chronic pain among cancer survivors, and (relatedly) complexities introduced by long-term opioid management, with many clinicians describing this practice as outside their skill set. Additionally, although most clinicians recognized chronic pain as a biopsychosocial phenomenon, they described challenges with effectively managing psychosocial stressors, including difficulty accessing mental or behavioral health services for cancer survivors. CONCLUSION Discovered challenges highlight unmet needs related to cancer survivor-clinician communication about chronic pain and the absence of a chronic pain management home for cancer survivors, including those requiring long-term opioid therapy. Research evaluating routine pain monitoring and accessible, tailored models of multimodal pain care in survivorship may help to address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K. Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Katie F. Jones
- Boston College, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA
| | - Laura J. Fish
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Michaela A. Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT
| | - T. Kayla Dunbar
- Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Program, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jessica Ma
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Jessica S. Merlin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Amy O'Regan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Kevin C. Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Skarf LM, Jones KF, Meyerson JL, Abrahm JL. Pharmacologic Pain Management: What Radiation Oncologists Should Know. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:93-103. [PMID: 36990640 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with cancer experience a host of symptoms, especially when the malignancy is advanced. Pain occurs from the cancer itself or related treatments. Undertreated pain contributes to patient suffering and lack of engagement in cancer-directed therapies. Adequate pain management includes thorough assessment; treatment by radiotherapists or anesthesia pain specialists; anti-inflammatory medications, oral or intravenous opioid analgesics, and topical agents; and attention to the emotional and functional effects of pain, which may involve social workers, psychologists, speech therapists, nutritionists, physiatrists and palliative medicine providers. This review discusses typical pain syndromes arising in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and provides concrete recommendations for pain assessment and pharmacologic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Michal Skarf
- Section of Palliative Care, VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Katie Fitzgerald Jones
- Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing and VA Boston Health Care System, Boston, MA
| | - Jordana L Meyerson
- Section of Palliative Care, VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Division of Adult Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sato K, Takeda N, Fuchikami H, Natsume N, Kato M, Okawa T. Impact of de-escalating systemic therapy guided by 21-gene assay on locoregional recurrence after partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:381-388. [PMID: 36894345 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Partial-breast irradiation (PBI) has been performed as alternative to whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Recently, the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) was introduced to determine the adjuvant therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative diseases. However, the impact of RS-based systemic therapy on locoregional recurrence (LRR) following BCT with PBI remains uninvestigated. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, and node-negative breast cancer who underwent BCT with PBI were examined during May 2012-March 2022. In addition to immunohistochemistry (IHC), RS was available to decide on adjuvant therapy. RESULTS In total, 431 patients were evaluated with a median followup of 48.6 months. The 4-year LRR-free survival rates were 97.3% and 96.4% in the IHC and RS cohorts, respectively (p = 0.50). Ki67 of >20% was significantly associated with LRR in the multivariate analysis (HR 4.39, p < 0.05). For patients with Ki67 > 20%, 29 of 71 (40.8%) and 46 of 59 (78.0%) patients received only endocrine therapy in the IHC and RS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). For patients with Ki67 >20% who received only endocrine therapy, the 4-year LRR-free survival rates were 91.8% in the IHC cohort and 94.6% in the RS cohort (p = 0.29) CONCLUSIONS: Although the introduction of RS increased the number of patients receiving endocrine therapy alone for Ki67 >20% of disease by two times, the LRR-free survival after BCT with PBI could be maintained. However, further studies from multiple institutions with longer followup data are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiko Sato
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Naoko Takeda
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromi Fuchikami
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nana Natsume
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rai R, Malik M, Valiyaveettil D, Ahmed SF, Basalatullah M. Assessment of late treatment-related symptoms using patient-reported outcomes and various factors affecting return to work in survivors of breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1533. [PMID: 37138959 PMCID: PMC10151075 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Survival in these patients has increased because of early diagnosis and multimodality treatment methods. Return to premorbid functional status after treatment is essential for rehabilitation and good quality of life. Many patients suffer from late treatment-related symptoms which affect their return to premorbid status. Various health-related and work-related variables also affect the return to premorbid status. Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional study in which 98 patients with breast carcinoma who received curative treatment were included 6-12 months post-radiotherapy completion. Patients were interviewed to assess their type of work and hours of work prior to diagnosis and at the time of the study. The extent to which they are able to return to their pre-diagnosis level of work was noted and various factors that were hindering them were documented. Treatment-related symptoms were assessed using selected questions from NCI PRO-CTCAE (version 1.0) questionnaire. Results The median age of diagnosis of patients included in the study was 49-50 years. The most common symptoms experienced by patients were fatigue (55%), pain (34%) and oedema (27%). 57% of patients were employed before diagnosis, of which only 20% were able to return to their employment post-treatment. All patients were involved in household work prior to diagnosis and 93% were able to get back to their routine household work, with 20% of patients requiring frequent work breaks. About 40% of patients reported social stigma as a factor that hindered them from returning to work. Conclusion Most patients return to household work post-treatment. Fatigue, pain and social stigma were the most common barriers to return to employment. Patient-reported outcomes and functional assessments can enable better survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajeshwari Rai
- Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | - Monica Malik
- Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | | | - Syed Fayaz Ahmed
- Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjagutta, Hyderabad 500082, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mo H, Yan X, Zhao F, Teng Y, Sun X, Lv Z, Cao M, Zhao J, Song G, Pan B, Li H, Zhai J, Xu B, Ma F. Association of Taxane Type With Patient-Reported Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Among Patients With Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2239788. [PMID: 36322088 PMCID: PMC9631104 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Understanding the detailed symptom spectrum of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) could facilitate shared decision-making and promote early intervention. OBJECTIVE To compare the symptom spectrum of patient-reported CIPN associated with nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, and docetaxel treatments among patients with breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study was conducted at 9 medical centers across China from 2019 to 2021. Participants included hospitalized women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, assessed with overlap propensity score weighting. Data were analyzed from from December 2021 to May 2022. EXPOSURES Treatment with nab-paclitaxel-, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based regimens. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient-reported CIPN on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire: CIPN 20-item instruments, consisting of sensory, motor, and autonomic scales. Multiple regression models were adjusted for baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS Of 1234 participants, the mean (SD) age was 50.9 (10.4) years, and 295 patients (23.9%) received nab-paclitaxel, 514 patients (41.7%) received paclitaxel, and 425 patients (34.4%) received docetaxel. The nab-paclitaxel group mostly reported numbness in hands or feet related to sensory symptoms (83 patients [81.4%]), while the paclitaxel and docetaxel groups reported mainly motor (eg, weakness in legs: 60 patients [47.2%] in the paclitaxel group; 52 patients [44.4%] in the docetaxel group) and autonomic (eg, blurred vision: 58 patients [45.7%] in the paclitaxel group; 51 patients [43.6%] in the docetaxel group) symptoms. Patients reported motor symptoms earlier than sensory abnormalities, with a median of 0.4 (95% CI, 0.4-2.3) weeks in the nab-paclitaxel group, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7-3.4) weeks in the paclitaxel group, and 5.6 (95% CI, 3.1-6.1) weeks in the docetaxel group. After overlap propensity score weighting and compared with the nab-paclitaxel group, the risks of patient-reported CIPN were lower in the paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.41-0.87]; P = .008) and the docetaxel (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94]; P = .02) groups. Similarly, patients who received paclitaxel (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.64]; P < .001) or docetaxel (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.36-0.75]; P < .001) reported less sensory discomfort compared with those who received nab-paclitaxel. However, the risk of patients in the paclitaxel or docetaxel groups reporting motor (paclitaxel: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.52-1.11]; P = .15; docetaxel: HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.47-1.01]; P = .05) and/or autonomic (paclitaxel: HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.49]; P = .98; docetaxel: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.59-1.30]; P = .52) symptoms was not lower than that in the nab-paclitaxel group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of women with invasive breast cancer, nab-paclitaxel was associated with more severe CIPN than either paclitaxel or docetaxel. In addition to sensory symptoms, the risk of motor and autonomic abnormalities was not low among these 3 taxanes, and patients-reported motor symptoms even earlier than sensory symptoms. These findings may facilitate early detection and intervention for CIPN in taxane treatments for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongnan Mo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyan Yan
- Department of Biostatistics, Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Fang Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuee Teng
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoying Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of HuanXing ChaoYang District, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Lv
- Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Mengru Cao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jiuda Zhao
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
| | - Guohong Song
- Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Pan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Huihui Li
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jingtong Zhai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stake-Nilsson K, Gustafsson S, Tödt K, Fransson P, Efverman A. A Study of Self-Care Practice in Routine Radiotherapy Care: Identifying Differences Between Practitioners and Non-Practitioners in Sociodemographic, Clinical, Functional, and Quality-of-Life-Related Characteristics. Integr Cancer Ther 2022; 21:15347354221130301. [PMID: 36245274 PMCID: PMC9575442 DOI: 10.1177/15347354221130301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe self-care practice during
radiotherapy for cancer and to identify potential differences between
practitioners and non-practitioners of self-care regarding sociodemographic,
clinical, functional, and quality-of-life-related characteristics. Methods: In this descriptive study, 439 patients (87% response rate) undergoing
radiotherapy responded to a study questionnaire regarding self-care,
sociodemographic, clinical (eg, experienced symptoms), functional, and
quality-of-life-related characteristics. Results: Of the 439 patients, 189 (43%) practiced at least one self-care strategy,
while 250 (57%) did not. In total, the patients described 332 self-care
practices, resulting in 14 different categories of self-care strategies. The
5 most common indicators of practicing self-care were fatigue, general
wellbeing, psychological symptoms, nausea, vomiting and improving physical
condition. The 5 most common self-care strategies were physical activity,
increased recovery, healthy eating, distraction, and skincare. Patients who
were married, were older than 69, patients with less education than
university education, patients undergoing a combination of internal and
external radiotherapy, patients experiencing fewer than 8 symptoms, and
better quality of life, practiced self-care to a lower extent than did other
patients. Functional capacity did not differ between self-care practitioners
and non-practitioners. Conclusion and Implications for Practice: Of the patients undergoing radiotherapy, slightly less than half practiced
self-care during an ordinary week of radiotherapy. Because older and
less-educated patients were less likely to practice self-care, cancer care
practitioners should consider paying particular attention to helping such
patients with their self-care practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Stake-Nilsson
- University of Gävle, Gävle,
Sweden,Kerstin Stake-Nilsson, Department of Caring
Science, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle,
kungsbäcksvägen 3, Gävle 801 76, Sweden.
| | | | - Kristina Tödt
- University of Gävle, Gävle,
Sweden,Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hodge FS, Line-Itty T, Arbing RHA. Cancer-Related Symptom Management Intervention for Southwest American Indians. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194771. [PMID: 36230694 PMCID: PMC9563929 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Quality of life during, and even after, cancer treatment is greatly affected by cancer symptoms that include pain, fatigue, and changes to mental state and activities of daily living, to name a few. American Indians living in the Southwestern United States have cancer experiences which may be different than the general population and have long been understudied. A randomized controlled trial designed to test the impact of a culturally tailored intervention on the management of individual cancer symptoms was implemented. Outcomes included improvement in pain, depression, fatigue and loss of function management in adult American Indians. Study evaluations at post-test show a significant improvement in scores from pre-test and compared to the control group, demonstrating increased knowledge levels in managing cancer-related symptoms. Study findings guide researchers towards a better understanding of the meaning and impact of cancer symptoms for American Indian cancer survivors, thus their improving care and quality of life. Abstract There is limited literature related to culturally embedded meanings of cancer and related symptoms among American Indians. A culturally appropriate intervention to improve management of cancer-related symptoms, including pain, depression, fatigue and loss of function, was tested. Two-hundred and twenty-two adult American Indians with cancer were recruited from eight Southwest sites for a randomized clinical trial. The intervention group received tailored education, a toolkit with a video, and participated in discussion sessions on cancer symptom management; the control group received information on dental care. Pre- and post-test questionnaires were administered to control and intervention groups. Measures included socio-demographics, cancer-related symptom management knowledge and behavior, and quality of life measures. Male cancer survivors reported poorer self-assessed health status and lower scores on quality-of-life indicators as compared to female cancer survivors. Significant improvement was reported in symptom management knowledge scores following the intervention: management of pain (p = 0.003), depression (p = 0.004), fatigue (p = 0.0001), and loss of function (p = 0.0001). This study is one of the first to demonstrate a change in physical symptom self-management skills, suggesting culturally appropriate education and interventions can successfully enhance cancer-related symptom management knowledge and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia S. Hodge
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Room 5-934A Factor Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 640 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-310-210-9887
| | - Tracy Line-Itty
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Room 5-934A Factor Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Rachel H. A. Arbing
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Room 5-934A Factor Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Non-Invasive Physical Plasma for Preventing Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer: A First-In-Human Feasibility Study. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14091767. [PMID: 36145515 PMCID: PMC9506560 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation dermatitis (RD) is the most common acute side effect of breast irradiation. More than a century following the therapeutic utilisation of X-rays, potent preventative and therapeutic options are still lacking. Non-invasive physical plasma (NIPP) is an emerging approach towards treatment of various dermatological disorders. In this study, we sought to determine the safety and feasibility of a NIPP device on RD. Thirty patients undergoing hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation were included. Parallel to radiation treatment, the irradiated breast was treated with NIPP with different application regimens. RD was assessed during and after NIPP/radiation, using clinician- and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, safety and feasibility features were recorded. None of the patients was prescribed topical corticosteroids and none considered the treatment to be unpleasant. RD was less frequent and milder in comparison with standard skin care. Neither NIPP-related adverse events nor side effects were reported. This proven safety and feasibility profile of a topical NIPP device in the prevention and treatment of RD will be used as the framework for a larger intrapatient-randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, using objective and patient-reported outcome measures as an endpoint.
Collapse
|
20
|
Jones KF, Cousin L, Meghani SH. Underrecognition of Symptoms During Breast Radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1509-1510. [PMID: 35951332 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Fitzgerald Jones
- William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Salimah H Meghani
- New Courtland Center for Transitions and Health, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yang S, Xu X. Underrecognition of Symptoms During Breast Radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1510. [PMID: 35951331 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shijie Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiequn Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jagsi R, Griffith KA. Underrecognition of Symptoms During Breast Radiotherapy-Reply. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1510-1511. [PMID: 35951335 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma Jagsi
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
UpToDate®. Nurse Pract 2022; 47:13. [PMID: 35877141 DOI: 10.1097/01.npr.0000841936.13185.d0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|