1
|
Augustin M, Berardesca E, Blume-Peytavi U, Elsner P, Scafa D, Schmeel LC, Proksch E. Managing dry skin in patients with comorbidities or with advanced age: unmet needs and roles for products containing potential emollient-plus ingredients. J DERMATOL TREAT 2024; 35:2326171. [PMID: 38565198 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2326171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
In dry skin (DS), skin-barrier function is easily disturbed and moisturizing factors in the stratum corneum are reduced. Despite being a common condition, DS is often overlooked in patients with advanced age or comorbid diseases. In September 2022, specialists in dermatology and skin care met to discuss unmet needs and management of patients with DS with existing medical conditions or DS induced by ongoing pharmacological treatments. There was consensus about the need to improve the current understanding and management of DS in patients with comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, radiodermatitis, and photodamaged skin. Clinical guidance related to optimal treatment of DS in patients with advanced age or comorbid diseases is needed. Dexpanthenol-containing emollients have been shown to provide rapid relief from the symptoms and clinical signs of skin inflammation and are well-tolerated and effective in terms of moisturizing and soothing DS and maintaining skin-barrier function. Thus, dexpanthenol-containing emollients may play an important role in future management of DS. Further research is needed to elucidate the efficacy of dexpanthenol across the spectrum of DS, irrespective of comorbidity status or age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enzo Berardesca
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sarria GR, Kugel F, Roehner F, Layer J, Dejonckheere C, Scafa D, Koeksal M, Leitzen C, Schmeel LC. Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation: Advantages in Delineation, Absorbed Dose-Distribution, and Logistics. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101394. [PMID: 38292888 PMCID: PMC10823084 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study's purpose was to compare the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in auto-contouring compared with a human practitioner in terms of precision, differences in dose distribution, and time consumption. Methods and Materials Datasets of previously irradiated patients in 3 different segments (head and neck, breast, and prostate cancer) were retrospectively collected. An experienced radiation oncologist (MD) performed organs-at-risk (OARs) and standard clinical target volume delineations as baseline structures for comparison. AI-based autocontours were generated in 2 additional CT copies; therefore, 3 groups were assessed: MD alone, AI alone, and AI plus MD corrections (AI+C). Differences in Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and person-hour burden were assessed. Furthermore, changes in clinically relevant dose-volume parameters were evaluated and compared. Results Seventy-five previously treated cases were collected (25 per segment) for the analysis. Compared with MD contours, the mean DSC scores were higher than 0.7 for 74% and 80% of AI and AI+C, respectively. After corrections, 17.1% structures presented DSC score deviations higher than 0.1 and 10.4% dose-volume parameters significantly changed in AI-contoured structures. The time consumption assessment yielded mean person-hour reductions of 68%, 51%, and 71% for breast, prostate, and head and neck cancer, respectively. Conclusions In great extent, AI yielded clinically acceptable OARs and certain clinical target volumes in the explored anatomic segments. Sparse correction and assessment requirements place AI+C as a standard workflow. Minimal clinically relevant differences in OAR exposure were identified. A substantial amount of person-hours could be repurposed with this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Julian Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Layer JP, Layer K, Glasmacher AR, Sarria GR, Böhner AMC, Layer YL, Dejonckheere CS, Wiegreffe S, Nour Y, Caglayan L, Grau F, Feyer P, Baumert BG, Baumann R, Krug D, Scafa D, Leitzen C, Landsberg J, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC. Pharmaceutical management of acute radiation dermatitis in the German speaking radiation oncology community. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:198-207. [PMID: 38092687 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation dermatitis (RD) remains the most common side effect in radiation therapy (RT) with various pharmaceutical options available for prevention and treatment. We sought to determine pharmaceutical management patterns of radiation dermatitis among radiation oncology professionals. METHODS We conducted a survey on RD among the German-speaking community of radiation oncologists inquiring for their opinion on preventive and therapeutic pharmaceutical approaches for acute RD. RESULTS 244 health professionals participated. Dexpanthenol lotion is the agent most widely used both for prevention (53.0%) and treatment (76.9%) of RD, followed by urea (29.8%) for prevention and corticosteroids (46.9%) for treatment. A wide range of substances is used by participants, though the overall experience with them is rather limited. 32.5% of participants do generally not recommend any preventative treatment. 53.4% of participants recommend alternative medicine for RD management. While seldomly used, corticosteroids were considered most effective in RD therapy, followed by dexpanthenol and low-level laser therapy. A majority of participants prefers moist over dry treatment of moist desquamation and 43.8% prescribe antiseptics. CONCLUSIONS Pharmaceutical management of RD in the German-speaking radiation oncology community remains controversial, inconsistent, and partially not supported by evidence-based medicine. Stronger evidence level and interdisciplinary consensus is required amongst practitioners to improve these care patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea R Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander M C Böhner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yonah L Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Shari Wiegreffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Youness Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lara Caglayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franziska Grau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Petra Feyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - René Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jennifer Landsberg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Layer JP, Layer K, Glasmacher AR, Sarria GR, Böhner AMC, Layer YL, Dejonckheere CS, Wiegreffe S, Nour Y, Caglayan L, Grau F, Feyer P, Baumert BG, Baumann R, Krug D, Scafa D, Leitzen C, Landsberg J, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC. Pharmazeutische Behandlung der akuten Radiodermatitis in der deutschsprachigen strahlentherapeutischen Gemeinschaft: Pharmaceutical management of acute radiation dermatitis in the German speaking radiation oncology community. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:198-209. [PMID: 38361198 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15279_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungHintergrundDie Radiodermatitis (RD) ist die häufigste Nebenwirkung der Strahlentherapie (RT), wobei verschiedene pharmazeutische Optionen zur Vorbeugung/Behandlung zur Verfügung stehen. Unser Ziel war, die pharmazeutischen Behandlungsmuster für die RD unter strahlentherapeutischen Fachleuten zu ermitteln.MethodikWir haben eine Umfrage zum Thema RD in der deutschsprachigen radioonkologischen Gemeinschaft durchgeführt und ihre Meinung zu präventiven und therapeutischen pharmazeutischen Therapieansätzen betreffend die akute RD erfragt.Ergebnisse244 Angehörige zugehöriger Gesundheitsberufe nahmen teil. Dexpanthenol‐Lotion ist das am häufigsten verwendete Mittel sowohl zur Vorbeugung (53%) als auch zur Behandlung (76,9%) der RD, gefolgt von Harnstoff (29,8%) zur Vorbeugung und Kortikosteroiden (46,9%) zur Behandlung. Die Teilnehmer verwenden eine breite Palette an Substanzen, haben aber insgesamt wenig Erfahrung mit diesen. 32,5% der Teilnehmer empfehlen generell keine präventive Behandlung. 53,4% der Teilnehmer empfehlen Alternativmedizin. Obwohl selten eingesetzt, wurden Kortikosteroide als wirksamstes Behandlungsmittel angesehen, gefolgt von Dexpanthenol und Low‐Level‐Lasertherapie. Die Mehrheit der Teilnehmer bevorzugt die feuchte gegenüber der trockenen Behandlung der feuchten Desquamation und 43,8% verschreiben Antiseptika.SchlussfolgerungenDie pharmazeutische Behandlung der RD in der deutschsprachigen strahlentherapeutischen Fachwelt ist nach wie vor umstritten, sowie mitunter inkonsistent und nicht durch evidenzbasierte Medizin gestützt. Ein interdisziplinärer Konsens ist erforderlich, um die bestehenden Behandlungskonzepte zu verbessern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P Layer
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
- Institut für Experimentelle Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Katharina Layer
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Andrea R Glasmacher
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Alexander M C Böhner
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Yonah L Layer
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Shari Wiegreffe
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Youness Nour
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Lara Caglayan
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Franziska Grau
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Petra Feyer
- Abteilung für Strahlenonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - René Baumann
- Abteilung für Strahlenonkologie, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Deutschland
| | - David Krug
- Abteilung für Strahlenonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Davide Scafa
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Jennifer Landsberg
- Abteilung für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Abteilung für Strahlenonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute am Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Leonard Christopher Schmeel
- Abteilung für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dejonckheere CS, Layer JP, Nour Y, Layer K, Glasmacher A, Wiegreffe S, Fuhrmann A, Caglayan L, Grau F, Sarria GR, Scafa D, Koch D, Heimann M, Leitzen C, Köksal MA, Röhner F, Müdder T, Dejonckheere E, Schmeel FC, Anzböck T, Lindner K, Bachmann A, Abramian A, Kaiser C, Faridi A, Mustea A, Giordano FA, Stope MB, Schmeel LC. Non-invasive physical plasma for preventing radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: Results from an intrapatient-randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100699. [PMID: 38021092 PMCID: PMC10654149 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose To investigate the effect of topical non-invasive physical plasma (NIPP), a volatile mix generated out of ambient air, on prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (RD) during and after whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Materials and Methods Lateral and medial breast halves were randomised within each patient to receive either 120 s of NIPP or sham treatment daily during WBI. Standard skin care with urea lotion was applied to the whole breast. Blinded acute skin toxicity was assessed weekly for each breast half separately and included clinician- (CTCAE) and patient-reported (modified RISRAS), and objective (spectrophotometry) assessments. As an additional external control, a comparable standard of care (SoC) patient collective from a previous prospective trial was used. Results Sixty-four patients were included. There were no significant differences between breast halves. Post-hoc comparison with a similar SoC control collective revealed OR = 0.28 (95% CI 0.11-0.76; p = 0.014) for grade ≥ 2 RD upon WBI completion, along with less hyperpigmentation (p < 0.001), oedema (p = 0.020), dry (p < 0.001) and moist desquamation (p = 0.017), pain, itching, and burning (p < 0.001 for each). Tolerability of NIPP was excellent and side effects were not observed. Conclusion Even though there were no differences between intrapatient-randomised breast halves, the overall incidence and severity of acute radiation-induced skin toxicity were considerably lower when compared to a prospectively collected SoC cohort. Our data suggest the potential benefit of NIPP in RD prevention. A randomised trial with a physical control group is warranted to confirm these promising results (DRKS00026225).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julian Philipp Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Younèss Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Shari Wiegreffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Arne Fuhrmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Lara Caglayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Franziska Grau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Martina Heimann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Ali Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Fred Röhner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Egon Dejonckheere
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 5037 Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Teresa Anzböck
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Kira Lindner
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Anne Bachmann
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Alina Abramian
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Kaiser
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Andree Faridi
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank Anton Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Bernhard Stope
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Layer JP, Fischer P, Dejonckheere CS, Sarria GR, Mispelbaum R, Hattenhauer T, Wiegreffe S, Glasmacher AR, Layer K, Nour Y, Caglayan L, Grau F, Müdder T, Köksal M, Scafa D, Giordano FA, Lopez-Pastorini A, Stoelben E, Schmeel LC, Leitzen C. Safety and efficacy of helical tomotherapy following lung-sparing surgery in locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. Strahlenther Onkol 2023:10.1007/s00066-023-02174-7. [PMID: 37993554 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02174-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the value of radiation therapy (RT) with helical tomotherapy (HT) in the management of locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) receiving no or lung-sparing surgery. METHODS Consecutive MPM cases not undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy and receiving intensity-modulated (IM) HT were retrospectively evaluated for local control, distant control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Impact of age, systemic treatment, RT dose, and recurrence patterns was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. As a secondary endpoint, reported toxicity was assessed. RESULTS A total of 34 localized MPM cases undergoing IMHT were identified, of which follow-up data were available for 31 patients. Grade 3 side effects were experienced by 26.7% of patients and there were no grade 4 or 5 events observed. Median PFS was 19 months. Median OS was 20 months and the rates for 1‑ and 2‑year OS were 86.2 and 41.4%, respectively. OS was significantly superior for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION IMHT of locally advanced MPM after lung-sparing surgery is safe and feasible, resulting in satisfactory local control and survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves OS. Randomized clinical trials incorporating modern RT techniques as a component of trimodal treatment are warranted to establish an evidence-based standard of care pattern for locally advanced MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Pascal Fischer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Hildegardis Hospital, Augustinerinnen Krankenhäuser gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rebekka Mispelbaum
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tessa Hattenhauer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Shari Wiegreffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea R Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Youness Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lara Caglayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franziska Grau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute of the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alberto Lopez-Pastorini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Hildegardis Hospital, Augustinerinnen Krankenhäuser gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Erich Stoelben
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Hildegardis Hospital, Augustinerinnen Krankenhäuser gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dejonckheere CS, Lindner K, Bachmann A, Abramian A, Layer K, Anzböck T, Layer JP, Sarria GR, Scafa D, Koch D, Leitzen C, Kaiser C, Faridi A, Schmeel LC. Do Barrier Films Impact Long-Term Skin Toxicity following Whole-Breast Irradiation? Objective Follow-Up of Two Randomised Trials. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7195. [PMID: 38002807 PMCID: PMC10672183 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Hydrofilm, a polyurethane-based barrier film, can be used to prevent acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer. This cost-effective prophylactic measure is currently being recommended to a growing number of patients, yet long-term safety data and its impact on late radiation-induced skin toxicity such as pigmentation changes and fibrosis have not been investigated. Methods: We objectively evaluated patients who were previously enrolled in either of two intrapatient-randomised (lateral versus medial breast halve) controlled trials on the use of Hydrofilm for RD prevention (DRKS00029665; registered on 19 July 2022). Results: Sixty-two patients (47.7% of the initial combined sample size) provided consent for this post-hoc examination, with a median follow-up time (range) of 58 (37-73) months. Following WBI, there was a significant increase in yellow skin tones of the entire breast when compared to baseline measurements before WBI (p < 0.001) and a significant increase of cutis, subcutis, and oedema thickness (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.004, respectively). At follow-up, there were no significant differences in either pigmentation changes or skin fibrosis between the Hydrofilm and standard of care breast halves. Conclusion: These data suggest that Hydrofilm can be safely used in the context of acute RD prevention, without affecting late side effects, supporting its widespread use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas Stefaan Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Kira Lindner
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Anne Bachmann
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Alina Abramian
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Teresa Anzböck
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Julian Philipp Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo Renato Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (K.L.); (C.L.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Christina Kaiser
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Andree Faridi
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Layer K, Layer JP, Glasmacher AR, Sarria GR, Böhner AMC, Layer YL, Dejonckheere CS, Garbe S, Feyer P, Baumert BG, Schendera A, Baumann R, Krug D, Köksal MA, Koch D, Scafa D, Leitzen C, Hölzel M, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC. Risk assessment, surveillance, and nonpharmaceutical prevention of acute radiation dermatitis: results of a multicentric survey among the German-speaking radiation oncology community. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:891-900. [PMID: 37099166 PMCID: PMC10542714 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02074-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation dermatitis (RD) represents one of the most frequent side effects in radiotherapy (RT). Despite technical progress, mild and moderate RD still affects major subsets of patients and identification and management of patients with a high risk of severe RD is essential. We sought to characterize surveillance and nonpharmaceutical preventive management of RD in German-speaking hospitals and private centers. METHODS We conducted a survey on RD among German-speaking radiation oncologists inquiring for their evaluation of risk factors, assessment methods, and nonpharmaceutical preventive management of RD. RESULTS A total of 244 health professionals from public and private institutions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland participated in the survey. RT-dependent factors were deemed most relevant for RD onset followed by lifestyle factors, emphasizing the impact of treatment conceptualization and patient education. While a broad majority of 92.8% assess RD at least once during RT, 59.0% of participants report RD at least partially arbitrarily and 17.4% stated to classify RD severity solely arbitrarily. 83.7% of all participants were unaware of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Consensus exists on some lifestyle recommendations like avoidance of sun exposure (98.7%), hot baths (95.1%), and mechanical irritation (91.8%) under RT, while deodorant use (63.4% not at all, 22.1% with restrictions) or application of skin lotion (15.1% disapproval) remain controversial and are not recommended by guidelines or evidence-based practices. CONCLUSION Identification of patients at an increased risk of RD and subsequent implementation of adequate preventive measures remain relevant and challenging aspects of clinical routines. Consensus exists on several risk factors and nonpharmaceutical prevention recommendations, while RT-dependent risk factors, e.g., the fractionation scheme, or hygienic measures like deodorant use remain controversial. Surveillance is widely lacking methodology and objectivity. Intensifying outreach in the radiation oncology community is needed to improve practice patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea R Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander M C Böhner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yonah L Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Petra Feyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Graubünden, Switzerland
| | - Anke Schendera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Hospital Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany
| | - René Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien Hospital Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Mümtaz A Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Hölzel
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leonard Christopher Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dejonckheere CS, Layer JP, Hamed M, Layer K, Glasmacher A, Friker LL, Potthoff AL, Zeyen T, Scafa D, Koch D, Garbe S, Holz JA, Kugel F, Grimmer M, Schmeel FC, Gielen GH, Forstbauer H, Vatter H, Herrlinger U, Giordano FA, Schneider M, Schmeel LC, Sarria GR. Intraoperative or postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: time to systemic treatment onset and other patient-relevant outcomes. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:683-691. [PMID: 37812290 PMCID: PMC10589145 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04464-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has become a viable treatment option for resectable brain metastases (BMs). As data on local control and radiation necrosis rates are maturing, we focus on meaningful secondary endpoints such as time to next treatment (TTNT), duration of postoperative corticosteroid treatment, and in-hospital time. METHODS Patients prospectively recruited within an IORT study registry between November 2020 and June 2023 were compared with consecutive patients receiving adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of the resection cavity within the same time frame. TTNT was defined as the number of days between BM resection and start of the next extracranial oncological therapy (systemic treatment, surgery, or radiotherapy) for each of the groups. RESULTS Of 95 BM patients screened, IORT was feasible in 84 cases (88%) and ultimately performed in 64 (67%). The control collective consisted of 53 SRT patients. There were no relevant differences in clinical baseline features. Mean TTNT (range) was 36 (9 - 94) days for IORT patients versus 52 (11 - 126) days for SRT patients (p = 0.01). Mean duration of postoperative corticosteroid treatment was similar (8 days; p = 0.83), as was mean postoperative in-hospital time (11 versus 12 days; p = 0.97). Mean total in-hospital time for BM treatment (in- and out-patient days) was 11 days for IORT versus 19 days for SRT patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION IORT for BMs results in faster completion of interdisciplinary treatment when compared to adjuvant SRT, without increasing corticosteroid intake or prolonging in-hospital times. A randomised phase III trial will determine the clinical effects of shorter TTNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lea L Friker
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Zeyen
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin A Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Fabian Kugel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Molina Grimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Gerrit H Gielen
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Köksal M, Özkan O, Holderried T, Heine A, Brossart P, Gawish A, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Leitzen C, Schmeel LC, Müdder T. Optimized Conformal Total Body Irradiation with VMAT Using a Linear-Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery Treatment System in Comparison to the Golden Standard Helical TomoTherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4220. [PMID: 37686498 PMCID: PMC10486387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern irradiation techniques for optimized conformal TBI can be realized by Helical Tomotherapy (HT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), depending on the availability of suitable specialized equipment. In this dosimetric planning study, we compared both modalities and addressed the question of whether VMAT with small field sizes is also suitable as a backup in case of HT equipment malfunctions. For this purpose, we retrospectively used planning computed tomography (CT) data from 10 patients treated with HT with a total dose of 8 Gy (n = 5) or 12 Gy (n = 5) for treatment planning for VMAT with a small field size (36 × 22 cm). The target volume coverage, dose homogeneity at target volume, and dose reduction in organs at risk (OAR) (lungs, kidneys, lenses) were analyzed and compared. One patient was irradiated with both modalities due to a device failure of the HT equipment during the study, which facilitated a comparison in a real clinical setting. The findings indicate that in addition to a higher mean dose to the lenses in the 12 Gy group for VMAT and a better dose homogeneity in the target volume for HT, comparably good and adequate target dose coverage and dose reduction in the other OAR could be achieved for both modalities, with significantly longer treatment times for VMAT. In conclusion, after appropriate optimization of the treatment times, VMAT using linear accelerator radiosurgery technology can be used both as a backup in addition to HT and in clinical routines to perform optimized conformal TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Oğuzhan Özkan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Holderried
- Department of Internal Medicine—Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany (P.B.)
| | - Annkristin Heine
- Department of Internal Medicine—Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany (P.B.)
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine—Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany (P.B.)
| | - Ahmed Gawish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Leonard C. Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köksal M, Baumert J, Jazmati D, Schoroth F, Garbe S, Koch D, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Leitzen C, Massoth G, Delis A, Heine A, Holderried T, Brossart P, Müdder T, Schmeel LC. Whole body irradiation with intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: analysis of organs at risk by dose and its effect on blood kinetics. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:7007-7015. [PMID: 36856852 PMCID: PMC10374741 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04657-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy (HT) is a promising technique in preparation for bone marrow transplantation. Nevertheless, radiation-sensitive organs can be substantially compromised due to suboptimal delivery techniques of total body irradiation (TBI). To reduce the potential burden of radiation toxicity to organs at risk (OAR), high-quality coverage and homogeneity are essential. We investigated dosimetric data from kidney, lung and thorax, liver, and spleen in relation to peripheral blood kinetics. To further advance intensity-modulated total body irradiation (TBI), the potential for dose reduction to lung and kidney was considered in the analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS 46 patients undergoing TBI were included in this analysis, partially divided into dose groups (2, 4, 8, and 12 Gy). HT was performed using a rotating gantry to ensuring optimal reduction of radiation to the lungs and kidneys and to provide optimal coverage of other OAR. Common dosimetric parameters, such as D05, D95, and D50, were calculated and analysed. Leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets, creatinine, GFR, haemoglobin, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease were related to the dosimetric evaluation using statistical tests. RESULTS The mean D95 of the lung is 48.23%, less than half the prescribed and unreduced dose. The D95 of the chest is almost twice as high at 84.95%. Overall liver coverage values ranged from 96.79% for D95 to 107% for D05. The average dose sparing of all patients analysed resulted in an average D95 of 68.64% in the right kidney and 69.31% in the left kidney. Average D95 in the spleen was 94.28% and D05 was 107.05%. Homogeneity indexes ranged from 1.12 for liver to 2.28 for lung. The additional significance analyses conducted on these blood kinetics showed a significant difference between the 2 Gray group and the other three groups for leukocyte counts. Further statistical comparisons of the dose groups showed no significant differences. However, there were significant changes in the dose of OAR prescribed with dose sparing (e.g., lung vs. rib and kidney). CONCLUSION Using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy to deliver TBI is a feasible method in preparation for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant dose sparing in radiosensitive organs such as the lungs and kidneys is achievable with good overall quality of coverage. Peripheral blood kinetics support the positive impact of HT and its advantages strongly encourage its implementation within clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | | | - Danny Jazmati
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Felix Schoroth
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Gregor Massoth
- Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Achilles Delis
- Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Annkristin Heine
- Internal Medicine-Oncology, Haematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Holderried
- Internal Medicine-Oncology, Haematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Peter Brossart
- Internal Medicine-Oncology, Haematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Layer JP, Hamed M, Potthoff AL, Dejonckheere CS, Layer K, Sarria GR, Scafa D, Koch D, Köksal M, Kugel F, Grimmer M, Holz JA, Zeyen T, Friker LL, Borger V, Schmeel FC, Weller J, Hölzel M, Schäfer N, Garbe S, Forstbauer H, Giordano FA, Herrlinger U, Vatter H, Schneider M, Schmeel LC. Outcome assessment of intraoperative radiotherapy for brain metastases: results of a prospective observational study with comparative matched-pair analysis. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:107-116. [PMID: 37477822 PMCID: PMC10462513 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04380-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an emerging alternative to adjuvant stereotactic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following resection of brain metastases (BM). Advantages of IORT include an instant prevention of tumor regrowth, optimized dose-sparing of adjacent healthy brain tissue and immediate completion of BM treatment, allowing an earlier admission to subsequent systemic treatments. However, prospective outcome data are limited. We sought to assess long-term outcome of IORT in comparison to EBRT. METHODS A total of 35 consecutive patients, prospectively recruited within a study registry, who received IORT following BM resection at a single neuro-oncological center were evaluated for radiation necrosis (RN) incidence rates, local control rates (LCR), distant brain progression (DBP) and overall survival (OS) as long-term outcome parameters. The 1 year-estimated OS and survival rates were compared in a balanced comparative matched-pair analysis to those of our institutional database, encompassing 388 consecutive patients who underwent adjuvant EBRT after BM resection. RESULTS The median IORT dose was 30 Gy prescribed to the applicator surface. A 2.9% RN rate was observed. The estimated 1 year-LCR was 97.1% and the 1 year-DBP-free survival 73.5%. Median time to DBP was 6.4 (range 1.7-24) months in the subgroup of patients experiencing intracerebral progression. The median OS was 17.5 (0.5-not reached) months with a 1 year-survival rate of 61.3%, which did not not significantly differ from the comparative cohort (p = 0.55 and p = 0.82, respectively). CONCLUSION IORT is a safe and effective fast-track approach following BM resection, with comparable long-term outcomes as adjuvant EBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Fabian Kugel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Molina Grimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin A Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Zeyen
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lea L Friker
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - F Carsten Schmeel
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Johannes Weller
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Hölzel
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute of the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Mannheim Institute of Intelligent Systems in Medicine (MIISM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - L Christopher Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dejonckheere CS, Abramian A, Lindner K, Bachmann A, Layer K, Anzböck T, Layer JP, Sarria GR, Scafa D, Koch D, Leitzen C, Kaiser C, Faridi A, Schmeel LC. Objective, Clinician- and Patient-Reported Evaluation of Late Toxicity Following Adjuvant Radiation for Early Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up Results of a Randomised Series. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4212. [PMID: 37445247 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: This study aimed to differentially assess the frequency and severity of late radiation-induced toxicity following adjuvant whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer with conventional fractionation (CF) and moderate hypofractionation (mHF). Materials and Methods: Patients recruited in a previous randomised controlled trial comparing acute toxicity between CF and mHF without disease recurrence were included in a post hoc analysis. Spectrophotometric and ultrasonographic examinations were performed for an objective evaluation and subsequent comparison of long-term skin toxicity. Furthermore, patient- and clinician-reported outcomes were recorded. Results: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 58 (37-81) years were included. The median follow-up was 57 (37-73) months. A total of 55% underwent CF and 45% mHF. A total of 52% received a sequential boost to the tumour bed. A significant decrease in mean L* (p = 0.011) and an increase in a* (p = 0.040) and b* values (p < 0.001) were observed, indicating hyperpigmentation. In comparison with the non-irradiated breast, there was a significant increase in both cutis (+14%; p < 0.001) and subcutis (+17%; p = 0.011) thickness, significantly more pronounced in CF patients (p = 0.049). In CF patients only, a sequential boost significantly increased the local cutis thickness and oedema compared to non-boost regions in the same breast (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: mHF objectively resulted in reduced long-term skin toxicity compared to CF. A sequential boost increased the local fibrosis rate in CF, but not in mHF. This might explain the subjectively reported better cosmetic outcomes in patients receiving mHF and reinforces the rationale for favouring mHF as the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alina Abramian
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Kira Lindner
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Anne Bachmann
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Teresa Anzböck
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Julian Philipp Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Kaiser
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Andree Faridi
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Köksal M, Hoppe C, Schröder AK, Scafa D, Koch D, Sarria GR, Leitzen C, Abramian A, Kaiser C, Faridi A, Henkenberens C, Schmeel LC, Giordano FA. Decision regret in breast cancer patients after adjuvant radiotherapy. Breast 2023; 68:133-141. [PMID: 36758448 PMCID: PMC9939714 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer patients often engage in shared decision-making to select an individualized treatment regimen from multiple options. However, dissatisfaction with treatment outcomes can lead to decision regret. We evaluated decision regret and physical and psychological well-being among breast cancer patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and explored their associations with patient, tumor, treatment, and symptom characteristics. METHODS This cross-sectional study involved retrospectively obtaining clinical data and data collected through interviews carried out as part of regular long-term medical aftercare. Decision regret regarding the radiotherapy was assessed using the Ottawa Decision Regret Scale, physical and psychological well-being were assessed using the PROMIS Global Health-10 questionnaire, and patients were asked about their treatment outcomes and symptoms. The questionnaire was administered 14 months to 4 years after completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS Of the 172 included breast cancer patients, only 13.9% expressed high decision regret, with most patients expressing little or no decision regret. More decision regret was associated with volumetric modulated arc therapy, chest wall irradiation, use of docetaxel as a chemotherapy agent, lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, new heart disease after radiotherapy, and lower psychological well-being. CONCLUSION Although most patients reported little or no decision regret, we identified several patient, treatment, and symptom characteristics associated with more decision regret. Our findings suggest that psychological well-being influences patients' satisfaction with therapy decisions, implying that practitioners should pay special attention to maintaining psychological well-being during shared decision-making and ensuring that psychological assessment and treatment is provided after cancer therapy to deal with long-term effects of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany.
| | - Clara Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Alina Abramian
- Department of Senology and Breast Center, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Kaiser
- Department of Senology and Breast Center, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Andree Faridi
- Department of Senology and Breast Center, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, Wernigerode, Germany
| | - Leonard C Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM), Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Janssen S, El Shafie RA, Ruder AM, Buergy D, Scafa D, Giordano FA, Nicolay NH, Vogel MME, Combs SE, Fahlbusch FB, Rades D, Käsmann L. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:337-349. [PMID: 36810957 PMCID: PMC9943039 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02048-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review existing scientific literature on mobile applications (apps) in the field of radiation oncology and to evaluate characteristics of commercially available apps across different platforms. METHODS A systematic review of the literature for publications presenting apps in the field of radiation oncology was carried out using the PubMed database, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and annual meetings of major radiation oncology societies. Additionally, the two major marketplaces for apps, App Store and Play Store, were searched for available radiation oncology apps for patients and health care professionals (HCP). RESULTS A total of 38 original publications which met the inclusion criteria were identified. Within those publications, 32 apps were developed for patients and 6 for HCP. The vast majority of patient apps focused on documenting electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). In the two major marketplaces, 26 apps were found, mainly supporting HCP with dose calculations. CONCLUSION Apps used in (and for) scientific research in radiation oncology are rarely available for patients and HCP in common marketplaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- Private Practice of Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Arne M Ruder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Buergy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Fabian B Fahlbusch
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Layer JP, Layer K, Sarria GR, Röhner F, Dejonckheere CS, Friker LL, Zeyen T, Koch D, Scafa D, Leitzen C, Köksal M, Schmeel FC, Schäfer N, Landsberg J, Hölzel M, Herrlinger U, Schneider M, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC. Five-Fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases-A Retrospective Analysis. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1300-1313. [PMID: 36826062 PMCID: PMC9955428 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the safety and outcome profile of five-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for brain metastases (BM), either as a definitive or adjuvant treatment. METHODS We assessed clinical data of patients receiving five fractions of 7 Gy each (cumulative physical dose of 35 Gy) to BM or surgical cavities. The primary endpoints were toxicity and radiation necrosis (RN) rates. Secondary endpoints were 1-year cumulative local control rate (LCR) and estimated overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 36 eligible patients receiving FSRT to a total of 49 targets were identified and included. The median follow up was 9 (1.1-56.2) months. The median age was 64.5 (34-92) years, the median ECOG score was 1, and the median Diagnostic-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) score was 2. Treatment was well tolerated and there were no grade 3 adverse events or higher. The overall RN rate was 14.3% and the median time to RN was 12.9 (1.8-23.8) months. RN occurrence was associated with immunotherapy, young age (≤45 years), and large PTV. The cumulative 1-year local control rate was 83.1% and the estimated median local progression free-survival was 18.8 months. The estimated median overall survival was 11 (1.1-56.2) months and significantly superior in those patients presenting with RN. CONCLUSIONS FSRT with 5 × 7 Gy represents a feasible, safe, and efficient fast track approach of intensified FSRT with acceptable LC and comparable RN rates for both the adjuvant and definitive RT settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P. Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Fred Röhner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Cas S. Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Lea L. Friker
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Zeyen
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Jennifer Landsberg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Hölzel
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Leonard Christopher Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Köksal M, Kersting L, Schoroth F, Garbe S, Koch D, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Leitzen C, Heine A, Holderried T, Brossart P, Zoga E, Attenberger U, Schmeel LC. Total marrow irradiation versus total body irradiation using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-022-04565-2. [PMID: 36607428 PMCID: PMC10356893 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04565-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total body irradiation (TBI) is often a component of the conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. However, total marrow irradiation (TMI) could be an alternative method for reducing radiation therapy-associated toxicity, as it specifically targets the skeleton and thus could better protect organs at risk. Here, we compared dosimetric changes in irradiation received by the target volume and organs at risk between TBI and TMI plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS Theoretical TMI plans were calculated for 35 patients with various hematological malignancies who had already received TBI in our clinic. We then statistically compared irradiation doses between the new TMI plans and existing TBI plans. We examined whether TMI provides greater protection of organs at risk while maintaining the prescribed dose in the targeted skeletal area. We also compared beam-on times between TBI and TMI. RESULTS TMI planning achieved significant reductions in the mean, minimum, and maximum irradiation doses in the lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and body (i.e., remaining tissue except organs and skeleton). In particular, the mean dose was reduced by 49% in the liver and spleen and by 55-59% in the kidneys. Moreover, TMI planning reduced the corpus beam-on time by an average of 217 s. CONCLUSION TMI planning achieved significant dose reduction in organs at risk while still achieving the prescribed dose in the target volume. Additionally, TMI planning reduced the beam-on time for corpus plans despite a high modulation factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Laura Kersting
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix Schoroth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Annkristin Heine
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology/ Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Holderried
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology/ Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology/ Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Eleni Zoga
- Deprtment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Leonard C Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Köksal M, Baumert J, Schoroth F, Scafa D, Koch D, Leitzen C, Sarria GR, Giordano FA, Chatzikonstantinou G, Schmeel LC. Lung sparing and ribcage coverage in total body irradiation delivered by helical tomotherapy. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:287. [PMID: 36496388 PMCID: PMC9737733 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00918-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Helical tomotherapy (HT) is a viable method for delivering total body irradiation (TBI) when preparing patients for allogenic stem cell or bone-marrow transplantation. TBI can be planned to reduce the amount of radiation delivered to organs at risk, such as the lungs, with the aim of decreasing toxicity. However, it is important for the ribcage to receive the prescribed radiation dose in preparation for bone-marrow transplantation. In this retrospective study, we analyzed radiation dose coverage of the lungs and ribcage in patients who underwent TBI delivered by HT to achieve lung dose sparing. METHODS Thirty-five patients were included in the analysis and divided into three groups based on their prescribed radiation dose (4, 8, or 12 Gy). HT was performed using a rotating gantry to reduce radiation to the lungs. Dosimetric parameters for the lungs and ribcage as well as dose-volume histograms were calculated. RESULTS The mean lung D95 was 60.97%, 54.77%, and 37.44% of the prescribed dose for patients receiving 4 Gy, 8 Gy, and 12 Gy, respectively. Ribcage coverage was most optimal for patients receiving 4 Gy, with a D95 of 91.27% and mean homogeneity index of 1.17, whereas patients receiving 12 Gy had a mean D95 of 78.65% and homogeneity index of 1.37, which is still within the range recommended by treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Using HT to achieve lung tissue sparing is a viable approach to minimizing pulmonic complications in patients undergoing TBI. As this planning adjustment does not compromise the dose and quality of coverage received by the ribcage, it is a feasible tool within conditioning regimens for allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jonathan Baumert
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix Schoroth
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georgios Chatzikonstantinou
- grid.411088.40000 0004 0578 8220Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Leonard C. Schmeel
- grid.15090.3d0000 0000 8786 803XDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Köksal M, Baumert J, Schoroth F, Müdder T, Scafa D, Koch D, Leitzen C, Sarria GR, Schmeel LC, Giordano FA. Helical versus static approaches to delivering tomotherapy to the junctional target for patients taller than 135 cm undergoing total body irradiation. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:265. [PMID: 36434707 PMCID: PMC9694876 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00886-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helical TomoTherapy® is widely used for total body irradiation as a component of conditioning regimens before allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation. However, this technique limits the maximum length of a planning target volume to 135 cm. Therefore, patients taller than 135 cm require two planning computed tomography scans and treatment plans. The junctional target between these two treatment plans is thus a critical region for treatment planning and delivery. Here, we compare radiation coverage of the junctional target between helical and static approaches to treatment planning and delivery to determine which approach allows high quality irradiation planning and provides more robustness against patient movement. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients who underwent total body irradiation using a static four-field box planning approach and nine patients who underwent total body irradiation using a helical planning approach. All patients were taller than 135 cm. The junctional target volume was divided into 10 slices of 1 cm thickness (JT1-JT10) for analysis. Dosimetric parameters and dose-volume histograms were compared to assess the quality of coverage of the junctional target between the helical and static planning approaches. RESULTS The D50 for the total junctional target was slightly higher than the prescribed dose for both helical and static approaches, with a mean of 108.12% for the helical group and 107.81% for the static group. The mean D95 was 98.44% ± 4.19% for the helical group and 96.20% ± 4.59% for the static group. The mean homogeneity index covering the entire junctional target volume was 1.20 ± 0.04 for the helical group and 1.21 ± 0.05 for the static group. The mean homogeneity index ranged from 1.08 ± 0.01 in JT1 to 1.22 ± 0.06 in JT6 for the helical group and from 1.06 ± 0.02 in JT1 to 1.19 ± 0.05 in JT6 for the static group. There were no significant differences in parameters between helical and static groups. However, the static approach provided robustness against up to 30 mm of lateral movement of the patient. CONCLUSIONS As long as TBI using helical TomoTherapy® is limited to a maximum length of 135 cm, the junctional target must be addressed during treatment planning. Our analysis shows that the static four-field box approach is viable and offers higher robustness against lateral movement of the patient than the helical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jonathan Baumert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix Schoroth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Leonard C. Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn, Bonn, Germany ,grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Köksal M, Saur L, Scafa D, Sarria G, Leitzen C, Schmeel C, Far F, Strieth S, Giordano FA. Late toxicity-related symptoms and fraction dose affect decision regret among patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2022; 44:1885-1895. [PMID: 35635498 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision regret reflects patient satisfaction with treatment choice and is associated with quality of life. This study aimed to identify patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and post-treatment symptoms associated with decision regret among patients with head and neck cancer who underwent surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, patients completed a questionnaire during a telephone interview. The questionnaire included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and several specific symptom-related items. By the time of data collection, all patients had concluded their radiotherapy a minimum of 2 months and maximum of 3.3 years prior. RESULTS Among the 108 patients included, 40.5% reported no regret, 30.1% reported mild regret, and 29.4% reported moderate to strong regret. A higher DRS score was most strongly associated with a lower single fraction dose and more restriction in everyday life. Higher DRS scores were also correlated with trouble speaking, trouble swallowing, pain in irradiated areas, dissatisfaction with one's appearance, feeling sad, and worry over one's future health. CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings, we recommended that patients with head and neck cancer undergoing adjuvant radiation receive psychosocial support and adequate treatment of late toxicity-related symptoms. When confronted with different therapeutic options, radiotherapy with a higher single fraction dose (i.e., hypofractionation) may be preferred due to its association with lower decision regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Leonard Saur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christopher Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Frederick Far
- Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Sebastian Strieth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Scafa D, Sarria G, Giordano F, Koch D, Muedder T, Holz J, Nour Y, Garbe S, Gonzalez-Carmona M, Feldmann G, Vilz T, Köksal M, Schmeel L. PO-1530 Dosimetric comparison of Intraoperative Radiotherapy and SRS for liver metastases. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03494-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
22
|
Hamed M, Potthoff AL, Layer JP, Koch D, Borger V, Heimann M, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Holz JA, Schmeel FC, Radbruch A, Güresir E, Schäfer N, Schuss P, Garbe S, Giordano FA, Herrlinger U, Vatter H, Schmeel LC, Schneider M. Benchmarking Safety Indicators of Surgical Treatment of Brain Metastases Combined with Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Results of Prospective Observational Study with Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061515. [PMID: 35326666 PMCID: PMC8946541 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with brain metastasis (BM) are at advanced stages of metastatic cancer, and surgical resection is often required in order to avoid severe neurologic deficits. After surgery, patients are usually committed to postoperative radiotherapy. In recent years, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional postsurgical radiation approaches. This possibility has several advantages, e.g., as IORT is administered only once during the surgical procedure, patients do not have to attend several radiotherapy sessions afterward. However, the application of radiation therapy directly into the open brain during surgery might be accompanied by severe perioperative complications and, therefore, might negatively impact the overall benefit. In the present study, we show that patients who underwent surgery for BM combined with IORT do not suffer from elevated levels of perioperative complications compared to patients without IORT. Therefore, IORT constitutes a safe treatment strategy for cancer patients with BM. Abstract Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of the operative cavity for surgically treated brain metastasis (BM) has gained increasing prominence with respect to improved local tumor control. However, IORT immediately performed at the time of surgery might be associated with increased levels of perioperative adverse events (PAEs). In the present study, we performed safety metric profiling in patients who had undergone surgery for BM with and without IORT in order to comparatively analyze feasibility of IORT as an adjuvant radiation approach. Between November 2020 and October 2021, 35 patients were surgically treated for BM with IORT at our neuro-oncological center. Perioperative complication profiles were collected in a prospective observational cohort study by means of patient safety indicators (PSIs), hospital-acquired conditions (HACs), and specific cranial-surgery-related complications (CSCs) as high-standard quality metric tools and compared to those of an institutional cohort of 388 patients with BM resection without IORT in a balanced comparative matched-pair analysis. Overall, 4 out of 35 patients (11%) with IORT in the course BM resection suffered from PAEs, accounting for 3 PSIs (9%) and 1 HAC (3%). Balanced matched-pair analysis did not reveal significant differences in the perioperative complication profiles between the cohorts of patients with and without IORT (p = 0.44). Thirty-day mortality rates were 6% for patients with IORT versus 8% for patients without IORT (p = 0.73). The present study demonstrates that IORT constitutes a safe and clinically feasible adjuvant treatment modality in patients undergoing surgical resection of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Anna-Laura Potthoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
- Correspondence: (A.-L.P.); (M.S.)
| | - Julian P. Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Muriel Heimann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Jasmin A. Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | | | - Alexander Radbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (F.C.S.); (A.R.)
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (N.S.); (U.H.)
| | - Patrick Schuss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, 12683 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (N.S.); (U.H.)
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Leonard Christopher Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
- Correspondence: (A.-L.P.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Scafa D, Muedder T, Holz JA, Koch D, Nour Y, Garbe S, Gonzalez-Carmona MA, Feldmann G, Vilz TO, Köksal M, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC, Sarria GR. Dosimetric Comparison of Intraoperative Radiotherapy and SRS for Liver Metastases. Front Oncol 2021; 11:767468. [PMID: 34926271 PMCID: PMC8674179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.767468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives To perform a dosimetric comparison between kilovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) simulating both deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) modalities for patients with liver metastases. Methods/Materials Diagnostic computed tomographies (CT) of patients carrying one or two lesions <4 cm and who underwent surgery were retrospectively screened and randomly selected for the study. For DIBH-SRS, a gross target volume (GTV) plus planning target volume (PTV) were delineated. For FB-SRS, a GTV plus an internal target volume (ITV) and PTV were defined. Accounting for the maximal GTV diameters, a modified GTV (GTV-IORT) was expanded circumferentially to simulate a resection cavity. The best suitable round-applicator size was thereafter selected. All treatment plans were calculated homogeneously to deliver 40 Gy. Doses delivered to organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes were compared for IORT vs. both SRS modalities. Results Eight patients encompassing 10 lesions were included in the study. The mean liver volume was 2,050.97 cm3 (SD, 650.82), and the mean GTV volume was 12.23 cm3 (SD, 12.62). As for target structures, GTV-IORT [19.44 cm3 (SD, 17.26)] were significantly smaller than both PTV DIBH-SRS [30.74 cm3 (SD, 24.64), p = 0.002] and PTV FB-SRS [75.82 cm3 (SD, 45.65), p = 0.002]. The median applicator size was 3 cm (1.5–4.5), and the mean IORT simulated delivery time was 45.45 min (SD, 19.88). All constraints were met in all modalities. Liver V9.1 showed significantly smaller volumes with IORT [63.39 cm3 (SD, 35.67)] when compared to DIBH-SRS [150.12 cm3 (SD, 81.43), p = 0.002] or FB-SRS [306.13 cm3 (SD, 128.75), p = 0.002]. No other statistical or dosimetrically relevant difference was observed for stomach, spinal cord, or biliary tract. Mean IORT D90 was 85.3% (SD, 6.05), whereas D95 for DIBH-SRS and FB-SRS were 99.03% (SD, 1.71; p = 0.042) and 98.04% (SD, 3.46; p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion Kilovoltage IORT bears the potential as novel add-on treatment for resectable liver metastases, significantly reducing healthy liver exposure to radiation in comparison to SRS. Prospective clinical evidence is required to confirm this hypothesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Muedder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin A Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Younéss Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Georg Feldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tim O Vilz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sarria GR, Smalec Z, Muedder T, Holz JA, Scafa D, Koch D, Garbe S, Schneider M, Hamed M, Vatter H, Herrlinger U, Giordano FA, Schmeel LC. Dosimetric Comparison of Upfront Boosting With Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:759873. [PMID: 34778080 PMCID: PMC8581360 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To simulate and analyze the dosimetric differences of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) or pre-operative single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in addition to post-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in Glioblastoma (GB). Methods Imaging series of previously treated patients with adjuvant radiochemotherapy were analyzed. For SRS target definition, pre-operative MRIs were co-registered to planning CT scans and a pre-operative T1-weighted gross target volume (GTV) plus a 2-mm planning target volume (PTV) were created. For IORT, a modified (m)GTV was expanded from the pre-operative volume, in order to mimic a round cavity as during IORT. Dose prescription was 20 Gy, homogeneously planned for SRS and calculated at the surface for IORT, to cover 99% and 90% of the volumes, respectively. For tumors > 2cm in maximum diameter, a 15 Gy dose was prescribed. Plan assessment was performed after calculating the 2-Gy equivalent doses (EQD2) for both boost modalities and including them into the EBRT plan. Main points of interest encompass differences in target coverage, brain volume receiving 12 Gy or more (V12), and doses to various organs-at-risk (OARs). Results Seventeen pre-delivered treatment plans were included in the study. The mean GTV was 21.72 cm3 (SD ± 19.36) and mGTV 29.64 cm3 (SD ± 25.64). The mean EBRT and SRS PTV were 254.09 (SD ± 80.0) and 36.20 cm3 (SD ± 31.48), respectively. Eight SRS plans were calculated to 15 Gy according to larger tumor sizes, while all IORT plans to 20 Gy. The mean EBRT D95 was 97.13% (SD ± 3.48) the SRS D99 99.91% (SD ± 0.35) and IORT D90 83.59% (SD ± 3.55). Accounting for only-boost approaches, the brain V12 was 49.68 cm3 (SD ± 26.70) and 16.94 cm3 (SD ± 13.33) (p<0.001) for SRS and IORT, respectively. After adding EBRT results respectively to SRS and IORT doses, significant lower doses were found in the latter for mean Dmax of chiasma (p=0.01), left optic nerve (p=0.023), right (p=0.008) and left retina (p<0.001). No significant differences were obtained for brainstem and cochleae. Conclusion Dose escalation for Glioblastoma using IORT results in lower OAR exposure as conventional SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Zuzanna Smalec
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Muedder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin A Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Buergy D, Riedel J, Sarria GR, Ehmann M, Scafa D, Grilli M, Wenz F, Hofheinz RD. Unfinished business: Terminated cancer trials and the relevance of treatment intent, sponsors and intervention types. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:1676-1684. [PMID: 33045097 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to report on the association of trial sponsors with intervention type, treatment intent, recruitment success and reasons to terminate cancer trials. The ClinicalTrials database was searched for interventional Phase 3 cancer trials (01/2006-05/2017). Noncancer studies and ongoing studies were excluded, permanently suspended studies were counted as terminated. Trials were stratified according to sponsors (industry/nonindustry), intervention type, setting (curative/palliative) and intent of intervention (curative/symptom-control/life-extending). We identified 345 terminated trials and 1137 completed studies as a control group. The frequency of premature termination did not differ significantly between sponsors. Time to termination was shorter but recruitment per month prior to termination was higher in industry-sponsored studies (7.0 vs 2.2 patients/month; P < .001). Drug interventions were more common in industry-sponsored, all other interventions in nonindustry-sponsored settings (P < .001). Life-extending palliative interventions occurred more frequently, symptom-control interventions in a curative setting less frequently in industry-sponsored trials (both P < .001). Intervention, setting and intent were not associated with termination in industry-sponsored trials. In nonindustry-sponsored trials, the frequency of drug interventions and life-extending (noncurative) interventions were increased in terminated trials (both P < .05); symptom-control interventions in curative settings occurred more frequently in completed studies. Industry-sponsored trials were more often terminated due to toxicity/inefficacy while lack of accrual occurred more frequently in nonindustry-sponsored trials (P < .01). Interventions, treatment setting/intent and reasons for termination differed between sponsor types. In nonindustry-sponsored trials, drug interventions and life-extending (noncurative) interventions were associated with premature termination and symptom-control interventions (curative setting) were associated with trial completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Buergy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julian Riedel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Ehmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maurizio Grilli
- Library for the Medical Faculty of Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- Board of Directors, Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ralf D Hofheinz
- Day Treatment Center (TTZ), Interdisciplinary Tumor Center Mannheim (ITM) and 3rd Medical Clinic, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Filippi AR, Ragona R, Piva C, Scafa D, Fiandra C, Fusella M, Giglioli FR, Lohr F, Ricardi U. Optimized volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3D-CRT for early stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma without axillary involvement: a comparison of second cancers and heart disease risk. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:161-8. [PMID: 25863763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Revised: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risks of second cancers and cardiovascular diseases associated with an optimized volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning solution in a selected cohort of stage I/II Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated with either involved-node or involved-site radiation therapy in comparison with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-eight patients (13 males and 25 females) were included. Disease extent was mediastinum alone (n=8, 21.1%); mediastinum plus unilateral neck (n=19, 50%); mediastinum plus bilateral neck (n=11, 29.9%). Prescription dose was 30 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Only 5 patients had mediastinal bulky disease at diagnosis (13.1%). Anteroposterior 3D-CRT was compared with a multiarc optimized VMAT solution. Lung, breast, and thyroid cancer risks were estimated by calculating a lifetime attributable risk (LAR), with a LAR ratio (LAR(VMAT)-to-LAR(3D-CRT)) as a comparative measure. Cardiac toxicity risks were estimated by calculating absolute excess risk (AER). RESULTS The LAR ratio favored 3D-CRT for lung cancer induction risk in mediastinal alone (P=.004) and mediastinal plus unilateral neck (P=.02) presentations. LAR ratio for breast cancer was lower for VMAT in mediastinal plus bilateral neck presentations (P=.02), without differences for other sites. For thyroid cancer, no significant differences were observed, regardless of anatomical presentation. A significantly lower AER of cardiac (P=.038) and valvular diseases (P<.0001) was observed for VMAT regardless of disease extent. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of patients with favorable characteristics in terms of disease extent at diagnosis (large prevalence of nonbulky presentations without axillary involvement), optimized VMAT reduced heart disease risk with comparable risks of thyroid and breast cancer, with an increase in lung cancer induction probability. The results are however strongly influenced by the different anatomical presentations, supporting an individualized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Riccardo Ragona
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Cristina Piva
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Fusella
- Medical Physics, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Frank Lohr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|