Assessment of Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Including Patients With Leptomeningeal Disease: A Systematic Review

TUXEDO-4: phase II study of trastuzumab-deruxtecan in HER2-low breast cancer with new or progressing brain metastases

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06048718 (clinicaltrials.gov); 2023 -506,702-39-00 (EudraCT number).

Cerebral spinal fluid analyses and therapeutic implications for leptomeningeal metastatic disease

PURPOSE

To review applications of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD) among patients with metastatic solid tumors.

METHODS

A narrative review identified original research related to CSF biomarkers among patients with metastatic solid tumors and LMD. Pre-clinical research (e.g. studies conducted in animal models) was not included. A descriptive analysis of literature was undertaken, with a focus on clinical applications related to the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of LMD.

RESULTS

The low cellularity of CSF in comparison to plasma is an advantage for liquid biopsy, given that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is not significantly diluted by genomic DNA from non-cancer cells. This results in higher variant allelic frequencies and increased sensitivity in detecting ctDNA compared to plasma. However, the clinical significance of positive ctDNA and/or circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the CSF, particularly in the absence of other signs of LMD (either clinical and/or radiological), remains unclear. While the use of CSF liquid biopsy to monitor treatment response is promising, this approach requires prospective validation using larger sample sizes prior to adoption in routine clinical care. Discovery efforts involving proteomics and metabolomics have potential to identify proteins involved in the regulation of energy metabolism, vasculature, and inflammation in LMD, which in turn, may offer insights into novel treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

CSF liquid biopsy should be incorporated in prospective studies for patients with LMD to validate promising diagnostic and/or predictive biomarkers of treatment response, as well as new therapeutic targets.

Leptomeningeal metastatic disease: new frontiers and future directions

Leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD), encompassing entities of 'meningeal carcinomatosis', neoplastic meningitis' and 'leukaemic/lymphomatous meningitis', arises secondary to the metastatic dissemination of cancer cells from extracranial and certain intracranial malignancies into the leptomeninges and cerebrospinal fluid. The clinical burden of LMD has been increasing secondary to more sensitive diagnostics, aggressive local therapies for discrete brain metastases, and improved management of extracranial disease with targeted and immunotherapeutic agents, resulting in improved survival. However, owing to drug delivery challenges and the unique microenvironment of LMD, novel therapies against systemic disease have not yet translated into improved outcomes for these patients. Underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis are common, response assessment remains challenging, and the prognosis associated with this disease of whole neuroaxis remains extremely poor. The dearth of effective therapies is further challenged by the difficulties in studying this dynamic disease state. In this Review, a multidisciplinary group of experts describe the emerging evidence and areas of active investigation in LMD and provide directed recommendations for future research. Drawing upon paradigm-changing advances in mechanistic science, computational approaches, and trial design, the authors discuss domain-specific and cross-disciplinary strategies for optimizing the clinical and translational research landscape for LMD. Advances in diagnostics, multi-agent intrathecal therapies, cell-based therapies, immunotherapies, proton craniospinal irradiation and ongoing clinical trials offer hope for improving outcomes for patients with LMD.

Sacituzumab govitecan response in extensive leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from triple-negative breast cancer: a case report

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), was the first ADC approved for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who had received at least two prior lines of therapy for advanced disease. Although SG has shown promising clinical activity in treating brain metastases in both ASCENT randomized trials and real-world analysis, its utility in leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) remains underexplored. We report the diagnostic and therapeutic process of a patient who develops extensive LC from TNBC treated with SG. She presented a clinical response after the first cycle of SG with a PFS of 6 months. This case report highlights the need for further inquiry into the use of SG in LC.

6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7)

This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.

What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?

Evidence from phase three clinical trials helps shape clinical practice. However, a very small minority of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials and many trials are not completed on time due to slow accrual. Issues with restrictive eligibility criteria can severely limit the patients who can access trials, without any convincing evidence that these restrictions impact patient safety. Similarly, regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles can delay trial activation, ultimately making some studies irrelevant. Additional issues during trial conduct (e.g., mandatory in-person visits, central confirmation of standard biomarkers, and inflexible drug dosage modification) contribute to making trials non-patient-centric. These real-life observations from experienced clinical trialists can seem nonsensical to investigators and patients alike, who are trying to bring effective drugs to patients with cancer. In this review, we delve into these issues in detail, and discuss potential solutions to make clinical trials more accessible to patients.

Pharmacotherapy for leptomeningeal disease in breast cancer

Clinical data supporting the best therapeutic approach in leptomeningeal disease (LMD; also known as leptomeningeal metastases or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) are lacking. Despite the development of new agents and increasing incidence of central nervous system metastases, patients with LMD are often excluded from clinical trials in breast cancer, with very few conducted specifically in LMD. Consequently, current evidence may not provide an accurate reflection of real-world clinical practice. This review aims to provide further insight into the treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer and LMD. We explore differences between clinical and real-world studies, considering inclusion criteria, levels of evidence for LMD diagnosis, and time between diagnosis of LMD and LMD-specific treatment initiation. Patient prognosis is poor; median overall survival is limited to several months, with approximately 10% of patients alive at 12 months. Efficacy results have been reported for various systemic and intrathecal agents in LMD to date. Systemic therapies under investigation for LMD in breast cancer include tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and paclitaxel trevatide; trastuzumab is the main intrathecal agent currently under investigation. Recent trials investigating systemic or intrathecal therapies are typically small, single-arm studies, and most are restricted to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Moreover, the variability among inclusion criteria and response assessment tools makes the interpretation of results difficult. Large retrospective cohorts with various inclusion criteria and treatment regimens provide some real-world data. However, there remains an urgent need for randomised clinical trials which include patients with LMD across all breast cancer subtypes.