Swallowing Function and Quality of Life in Patients Treated With Transoral Videolaryngoscopic Surgery for Pharyngolaryngeal Cancer

BACKGROUND

It is controversial whether transoral resection for early pharyngolaryngeal cancer preserves swallowing function and quality of life. We investigated swallowing function and quality of life before and after transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS).

METHODS

Seventy-three patients with pharyngolaryngeal cancer who underwent TOVS between July 2012 and July 2022 were enrolled in this prospective analysis. The Hyodo score and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires were recorded preoperatively and at three, six, and 12 months postoperatively, in addition to the postoperative functional outcome swallowing scale (FOSS) at six months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Although most patients could consume food orally without restrictions with a preferable FOSS score, 23 patients showed impaired Hyodo scores. Age ≥65 years significantly predicted impaired swallowing. Sub-scores of the impaired patient group showed worsening for the glottal closure reflex when the endoscope touched the epiglottis or arytenoid, as well as a reduction in the extent of pharyngeal clearance following the ingestion of blue-dyed water.

CONCLUSION

After TOVS, swallowing function is generally well preserved. Elderly patients, especially those with laryngeal hypoesthesia and poor clearance, are at risk of swallowing dysfunction.

Quality of Life After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharynx Cancer

Importance

Efforts are underway to deintensified treatment protocols for patients with human papillomavirus virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) to achieve similar excellent oncologic outcomes while reducing treatment-related adverse effects. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as primary treatment often requires adjuvant therapy due to the high incidence of nodal metastasis. Treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and neck dissection (NECTORS), reserving radiation therapy for salvage, yields excellent oncologic outcomes.

Objective

To assess patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes among patients with HPV-OPSCC who undergo NECTORS.

Design, Settings, and Participants

This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with HPV-OPSCC treated with the NECTORS protocol in 2017 to 2022. Consecutive patients with stage III or IVa HPV-OPSCC treated with NECTORS in 2017 to 2022 who had completed the primary QOL questionnaire at baseline and at least once during the 24-month follow-up period were included. Ninety-four patients were eligible, and 67 were included in the analyses.

Outcome Measures

QOL questionnaires at baseline, and at month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 posttreatment. Global score on the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was the primary outcome; the head and neck extension module (EORTC QLQ-HN35); the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory for dysphagia-related QOL; and the Decision Regret Scale were also used. Paired t tests assessed change between the baseline and 12- or 24-month patient-reported outcomes.

Results

Among the study population of 67 patients (median [range] age, 63 [58-67] years; 54 [80.6%] male) with HPV-OPSCC, the most frequent cancer subsites were palatine tonsil (41 [61%]) and base of tongue (26 [39%]); none required adjuvant RT. Global QOL at 24 months improved compared with baseline (mean difference, 9.49; 95% CI, 2.45 to 16.53). All EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scores returned to baseline or improved within 3 to 6 months posttreatment and remained stable at 24 months. EORTC QLQ-HN35 symptom scale scores improved or were stable at 24 months. The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores demonstrated no significant difference between baseline and month 12 for global scores (mean difference, 6.15; 95% CI, -4.18 to 16.49) and composite scores (mean difference, 2.73; 95% CI, -1.62 to 7.09). Median (range) score on the Decision Regret Scale was 5 of 100 (0-30), representing mild overall regret.

Conclusion and Relevance

The findings of this multicenter cohort study indicate that use of the NECTORS protocol is associated with excellent QOL outcomes. QOL measures returned to baseline levels or were better than baseline, which represents positive outcomes for patients with HPV-OPSCC who undergo this treatment regimen.

Head and Neck Cancer: A Study on the Complex Relationship between QoL and Swallowing Function

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is linked to significant morbidity, adversely affecting survival and functional capacity. Post-treatment challenges such as pain, dysphonia, and dysphagia are common, prompting increased attention in survivorship research. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, especially the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), are prevalent outcome measures in clinical studies but often lack parallel objective swallowing function evaluations, leading to potential outcome discrepancies. This study aimed to illuminate the relationship between subjective QoL (EQ-5D-5L and MDADI) measures and objective swallowing function (evaluated via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, FEES) in patients with HNSCC. The analysis revealed a notable discordance between objective measures of swallowing function, such as the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and residue ratings in the vallecula or piriform sinus, and patients' subjective QoL assessments (p = 0.21). Despite the lack of correlation, swallowing-related QoL, as measured by the MDADI, was more indicative of disease severity than generic QoL assessments. Generic QoL scores did not demonstrate substantial variation between patients. In contrast, MDADI scores significantly declined with advancing tumor stage, multimodal therapy, and reliance on feeding tubes. However, the clinical significance of this finding was tempered by the less than 10-point difference in MDADI scores. The findings of this study underline the limitations of QoL measures as standalone assessments in patients with HNSCC, given their reliance on patient-perceived impairment. While subjective QoL is a crucial aspect of evaluating therapeutic success and patient-centric outcomes, it may fail to capture critical clinical details such as silent aspirations. Consequently, QoL assessments should be augmented by objective evaluations of swallowing function in clinical research and practice to ensure a holistic understanding of patient well-being and treatment impact.

Staged neck dissection prior to transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: does it reduce post-operative complication rates? A multi-centre study of 104 patients

PURPOSE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become increasingly recognised as a safe and effective treatment for early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, often performed in conjunction with neck dissection (ND) and vessel ligation. It has been proposed that performing the neck dissection in a staged fashion prior to TORS results in low rates of transoral haemorrhage and pharyngocutaneous fistula, and may aid in TORS patient selection by eliminating patients who would require multi-modality treatment based on nodal pathology. This study aims to assess the effect of staged neck dissection with TORS in mitigating pharyngocutaneous fistulae and post-operative haemorrhage as well as the impact of staged ND on TORS patient selection.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of patients undergoing staged ND with intent to proceed to TORS at two Australian hospitals between 2014 and 2022. Incidence of post-operative haemorrhage and pharyngocutaneous fistula and length of inpatient stay was identified. The number of patients who did not proceed to TORS was recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients were identified who underwent staged neck dissection with an intention to proceed to TORS. Six patients did not proceed to TORS following pathological assessment of the neck dissection specimen and ninety-eight patients (91 primary, 7 salvage) underwent TORS. There were six cases of secondary haemorrhage (one major, two intermediate and three minor). There were no cases of pharyngocutaneous fistula.

CONCLUSION

Staged neck dissection prior to TORS results in low rates of haemorrhage and pharyngocutaneous fistula and can improve TORS patient selection.

Transoral robotic surgery - time for consensus on pain assessment. A review

BACKGROUND

In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS.

AIM

This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity.

METHODS

Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases.

RESULTS

Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology.

Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Population-Based Cohort Following Radiotherapy vs Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer

Importance

Oncologic outcomes are similar for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treated with primary surgery or radiotherapy. However, comparative differences in long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between modalities are less well established.

Objective

To determine the association between primary surgery or radiotherapy and long-term PROs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used the Texas Cancer Registry to identify survivors of OPSCC treated definitively with primary radiotherapy or surgery between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016. Patients were surveyed in October 2020 and April 2021.

Exposures

Primary radiotherapy and surgery for OPSCC.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patients completed a questionnaire that included demographic and treatment information, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) module, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), and the Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (EAR) scale. Multivariable linear regression models were performed to evaluate the association of treatment (surgery vs radiotherapy) with PROs while controlling for additional variables.

Results

Questionnaires were mailed to 1600 survivors of OPSCC identified from the Texas Cancer Registry, with 400 responding (25% response rate), of whom 183 (46.2%) were 8 to 15 years from their initial diagnosis. The final analysis included 396 patients (aged ≤57 years, 190 [48.0%]; aged >57 years, 206 [52.0%]; female, 72 [18.2%]; male, 324 [81.8%]). After multivariable adjustment, no significant differences were found between surgery and radiotherapy outcomes as measured by the MDASI-HN (β, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.6), NDII (β, -1.7; 95% CI, -6.7 to 3.4), and EAR (β, -0.9; 95% CI -7.7 to 5.8). In contrast, less education, lower household income, and feeding tube use were associated with significantly worse MDASI-HN, NDII, and EAR scores, while concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy was associated with worse MDASI-HN and EAR scores.

Conclusions and Relevance

This population-based cohort study found no associations between long-term PROs and primary radiotherapy or surgery for OPSCC. Lower socioeconomic status, feeding tube use, and concurrent chemotherapy were associated with worse long-term PROs. Further efforts should focus on the mechanism, prevention, and rehabilitation of these long-term treatment toxicities. The long-term outcomes of concurrent chemotherapy should be validated and may inform treatment decision making.

30-day morbidity and mortality after transoral robotic surgery for human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of two prospective adjuvant de-escalation trials (MC1273 & MC1675)

OBJECTIVE

Dose de-escalation of adjuvant therapy (DART) in patients with HPV(+)OPSCC was investigated in two prospective Phase II and III clinical trials (MC1273 and MC1675). We report the 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with primary TORS resection in patients enrolled in these trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with HPV(+)OPSCC, who underwent TORS resection between 2013 and 2020 were considered in this analysis. The severity of postoperative transoral bleeding was graded using both the Hinni Grade (HG) transoral surgery bleeding scale and the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Post-surgical complications within 30 days of surgery, as well as rates of tracheostomy, PEG and nasogastric tube placement.

RESULTS

219 patients were included. A total of 7 (3.2 %) patients had a tracheostomy placed at the time of surgery, and all were decannulated within 26 days (median: 5, range: 2-26). There were 33 (15.1 %) returns to the emergency department (ED) with 10 (4.6 %) patients requiring readmission. Using the HG scale, 10 (4.6 %) patients experienced ≥ Grade 3 bleeding with no Grade 5 or 6 bleeds. In contrast, using the CTCAE scale, 15 patients (6.8 %) experienced ≥ Grade 3 bleeding with no Grade 5 bleeds. There was one post-operative death in a patient withdrawn from the trial, and no deaths related to hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

TORS for HPV(+)OPSCC in carefully selected patients at a high volume center was associated with low morbidity and mortality.

De-Escalation Strategies for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma—Where Are We Now?

The prevalence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has been increasing in North America due to human papillomavirus-associated disease. It is molecularly distinct and differs from other head and neck cancers due to the young population and high survival rate. The treatment regimens currently in place cause significant long-term toxicities. Studies have transitioned from mortality-based outcomes to patient-reported outcomes assessing quality of life. There are many completed and ongoing trials investigating alternative therapy regimens or de-escalation strategies to minimize the negative secondary effects while maintaining overall survival and disease-free survival. The goal of this review is to discuss the most recent advancements within the field while summarizing and reviewing the available evidence.

Effect of histopathological grade on treatment and survival in base of tongue adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate survival differences between low-grade and high-grade base of tongue (BOT) adenocarcinoma by examining demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with BOT adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all cases of BOT adenocarcinoma. Subsequent analysis focused on low-grade (grade 1 and grade 2) and high-grade (grade 3 and grade 4) BOT adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients with BOT adenocarcinoma were included in the main cohort and divided into low grade (n = 137) and high grade (n = 66). The 5-year overall survival for all patients, low-grade, and high-grade was 67%, 85%, and 58%, respectively. Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival for the main cohort include advanced age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.06), non-white race (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.04-3.25), public insurance (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.02-3.14) and high-grade 3,4 (HR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.51-4.56). The prognostic factor associated with increased survival for the main cohort was surgery (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.96). Radiotherapy was associated with improved overall survival for high-grade BOT adenocarcinoma (HR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.02-0.49) but not for low-grade BOT adenocarcinoma (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.38-2.32).

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation is the largest to date analyzing the association of treatment modalities with overall survival in BOT adenocarcinoma. Surgery remains standard of treatment, particularly in low-grade cases, with radiotherapy offering additional survival benefit for high-grade BOT adenocarcinoma.

Patient Benefit and Quality of Life after Robot-Assisted Head and Neck Surgery

Robotic systems for head and neck surgery are at different stages of technical development and clinical application. Currently, robotic systems are predominantly used for transoral surgery of the pharynx and larynx. Robotic surgery of the neck, the thyroid, and the middle and inner ear is much less common; however, some oncological and functional outcomes have been reported. This article provides an overview of the current state of robot-assisted head and neck surgery with a special emphasis on patient benefit and postoperative quality of life (QoL). The focus is placed on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the resection of oropharyngeal carcinomas. For this application, reported long-term outcomes show functional post-operative advantages for selected oropharyngeal cancer patients after TORS compared to open surgery and primary radiotherapy. Since TORS also plays a significant role in the context of potential therapy de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients, ongoing trials are presented. Regarding the evaluation of the therapeutic benefit and the QoL of cancer patients, special attention has to be paid to the large degree of variability of individual patients' preferences. Influencing factors and tools for a detailed assessment of QoL parameters are therefore detailed at the beginning of this article. Notably, while some robotic systems for ear and skull base surgery are being developed in Europe, TORS systems are mainly used in North America and Asia. In Europe and Germany in particular, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is a well-established technology for transoral tumor resection. Future trials comparing TORS and TLM with detailed investigation of QoL parameters are therefore warranted and might contribute to identifying suitable fields for the application of the different techniques.

Early postoperative functional outcomes following transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review

There has been increased interest in the use of transoral surgery (TOS) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). This systematic review summarizes the available evidence for validated functional outcomes following TOS for OPC, within the early postoperative period. Key databases were searched. Primary TOS resections of human subjects were included. Validated functional outcomes extracted included instrumental assessment, clinician rated, and patient reported measures. Database searches yielded 7186 titles between 1990 and December 2020. Full-text articles were obtained for 296 eligible studies, which were screened and a resulting 14 studies, comprising 665 participants were included in the review. Oropharyngeal dysfunction following TOS was observed across all three categories of outcome measures (OMs) reported and was dependent on pretreatment function, T-classification, and tumor volume. Future investigations should include optimal OMs to be used in the postoperative setting to allow for conclusive comparisons.

[Role of Robotic Surgery in ENT]

Since the beginning of the 21^st century, surgical robots have been used in the ENT-environment. They primarily support surgeons in minimal invasive transoral operations, especially in multidisciplinary treatment concepts of head and neck tumors, but also in snoring surgery the robot provides a complement to the established transoral laser surgery. In the meantime there is a large number of data that deals with the importance of oncological results, function maintenance, economics and future perspectives.Operation areas of the current robot devices are still limited in the ENT-environment. As the number of cases are small, efforts are being made to connect centres on a national and international level. Thus, uniform training standards, targeted knowledge and data exchange as well as further development of systems would be managed better. The creation of small and agile ENT-specific equipment could expand the possibilities as a next step for the future and finally lead to a wide scale of ENT-surgical applications.

Impact of surgical margins on local control in patients undergoing single-modality transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The impact of close surgical margins on oncologic outcomes in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC) is unclear.

METHODS

Retrospective case series including patients undergoing single modality transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for HPV + OPSCC at three academic medical centers from 2010 to 2019. Outcomes were compared between patients with close surgical margins (<1 mm or requiring re-resection) and clear margins using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were included (median follow-up 21 months, range 6-121). Final margins were close in 22 (22.2%) patients, clear in 75 (75.8%), and positive in two (2.0%). Eight patients (8.1%) recurred, including two local recurrences (2.0%). Four patients died during the study period (4.0%). Local control (p = 0.470), disease-free survival (p = 0.513), and overall survival (p = 0.064) did not differ between patients with close and clear margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with close surgical margins after TORS for HPV + OPSCC without concurrent indications for adjuvant therapy may be considered for observation alone.

Cost Considerations for Robotic Surgery

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a rapidly growing diagnostic and therapeutic modality in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, having already made a large impact in the short time since its inception. Cost-effectiveness analysis is complex, and a thorough cost-effectiveness inquiry should analyze not only financial consequences but also impact on the health state of the patient. The cost-effectiveness of TORS is still under scrutiny, but the early data suggest that TORS is a cost-effective method compared with other available options when used in appropriately selected patients.

Quality of Life Implications After Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancers

Oropharyngeal cancers and their treatment can exquisitely affect a patient's quality of life and functional outcome. Transoral robotic surgery offers a minimally invasive surgical approach that mitigates injury from traditional open surgical approaches and offers a treatment more likely to have short-term side effects compared with nonsurgical treatment. Feeding tube dependence, oral intake, and swallowing questionnaires, in addition to swallowing evaluations provide a snapshot of a patient's current swallowing function. Investigation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes allows for understanding of their symptomatology and the comparison of different treatment strategies.

Prognostic Indicators in Base of Tongue Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this investigation are to characterize the epidemiology of base of tongue adenocarcinoma utilizing a population-based database and to identify prognostic factors that may affect survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to evaluate the association of suspected prognostic factors with survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 176 cases were eligible based on inclusion criteria. The 5-year OS and DSS were 49% and 66%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, surgical management was associated with improved OS and DSS (OS hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.58, P < .001; DSS HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09-0.48, P < .001), while higher tumor grade was associated with worse OS and DSS (OS HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.14-2.19, P = .006; DSS HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.01-2.79, P = .045). Administration of chemotherapy or radiation did not have a significant association with OS or DSS.

CONCLUSION

This investigation is the largest to date to analyze the base of tongue adenocarcinoma as its own entity. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, and lower tumor grade is associated with improved survival in these patients. Administration of radiation or chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival.

RNA Oncoimmune Phenotyping of HPV-Positive p16-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas by Nodal Status

Importance

Clinical trials that deintensify treatment for patients with suspected human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) use p16 expression to identify HPV-mediated tumors and guide treatment. While p16 staining has a strong correlation with good outcomes, approximately 12% of p16-positive patients have recurrent disease. Biomarkers that reveal tumor-specific characteristics, such as nodal involvement, may change therapy decisions.

Objective

To assess whether if a tumor-specific genetic signature exists for node-negative vs node-positive HPV 16-positive/p16-positive OPSCCs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study with randomized case selection for p16 OPSCCs undertaken at a university-based, tertiary care cancer center. Samples were collected from patients with p16-positive OPSCC. A total of 21 HPV 16/p16-positive tumors were used in this study.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Gene expression profiles of node-negative vs node-positive tumor samples were evaluated using a differential expression analysis approach and the sensitivity and specificity of a molecular signature was determined.

Results

Among the 21 patients in the study (3 women, 18 men; mean [SD] age, 54.6 [9.6] years), 6 had node-negative disease and 15 had node-positive disease. Using differential expression analysis, we found 146 genes that were significantly different in patients with node-negative disease vs those with node-positive disease, of which 15 genes were used to create a genetic signature that could distinguish node-negative-like from node-positive-like disease. The resultant molecular signature has a sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI, 63.6%-98.5%) and specificity of 85.7% (95% CI, 42.1%-99.6%). The positive likelihood ratio of this signature was 6.1 (95% CI, 1.0-38.2) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.1 (95% CI, 0.04-0.5). Given this population's prevalence of node-positive disease of 70.8%, the positive- and negative-predicative values for this gene signature were 93.7% (95% CI, 70.8%-98.9%) and 75.0% (95% CI, 44.1%-92.0%), respectively. In addition, we developed a gene signature using agnostic, machine learning software that identified a 40-gene profile that predicts node-negative disease from node-positive disease (area under the curve, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00).

Conclusions and Relevance

Many HPV-16 and p16-positive tumors are treated as "lower-risk," but they do not have similar genetic compositions at the biological level. The identification of subgroups with unique expression patterns, such as those with nodal metastases, may guide physicians toward alternative or more aggressive therapies. In our study, unguided clustering suggested that that the larger biological characteristics of a tumor could be a better prognostic biomarker.

Validation of NRG oncology/RTOG-0129 risk groups for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: Implications for risk-based therapeutic intensity trials

BACKGROUND

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-0129 recursive partitioning analysis was the basis for risk-based therapeutic intensification trials for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). To the authors' knowledge, the question of whether RTOG-0129 overall survival (OS) estimates for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups are similar in other data sets or applicable to progression-free survival (PFS) is unknown. Therefore, the authors evaluated whether survival differences between RTOG-0129 risk groups persist at 5 years, are reproducible in an independent clinical trial, and are applicable to PFS, and whether toxicities differ across risk groups.

METHODS

Prospective randomized clinical trials were analyzed retrospectively. RTOG-0129 evaluated standard versus accelerated fractionation radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin. RTOG-0522 compared the combination of cisplatin and accelerated fractionation with or without cetuximab. Patients with OPC with available p16 status and tobacco history were eligible.

RESULTS

There was a total of 260 patients and 287 patients, respectively, from RTOG-0129 and RTOG-0522, with median follow-ups for surviving patients of 7.9 years (range, 1.7-9.9 years) and 4.7 years (range, 0.1-7.0 years), respectively. Previous OS differences in RTOG-0129 persisted at 5 years. In RTOG-0522, the 5-year OS rates for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 88.1%, 69.9%, and 45.1%, respectively (P for trend, <.001). The 5-year PFS rates for the same 3 groups were 72.9%, 56.1%, and 42.2%, respectively. In RTOG-0522 among a subgroup of patients considered to be at very good risk (p16-positive disease, smoking history of ≤10 pack-years, and classified with T1-T2 disease with ipsilateral lymph nodes measuring ≤6 cm or T3 disease without contralateral or >6 cm lymph nodes), the 5-year OS and PFS rates were 93.8% and 82.2%, respectively. Overall rates of acute and late toxicities were similar by risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

RTOG-0129 risk groups persisted at 5 years and were reproducible in RTOG-0522. However, there was variability in the estimates. These data underscore the importance of long-term follow-up and appropriate patient selection in therapeutic deintensification trials.

Phase II Evaluation of Aggressive Dose De-Escalation for Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if dose de-escalation from 60 to 66 Gy to 30 to 36 Gy of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for selected patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma could maintain historical rates for disease control while reducing toxicity and preserving swallow function and quality of life (QOL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MC1273 was a single-arm phase II trial testing an aggressive course of RT de-escalation after surgery. Eligibility criteria included patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, smoking history of 10 pack-years or less, and negative margins. Cohort A (intermediate risk) received 30 Gy delivered in 1.5-Gy fractions twice per day over 2 weeks along with 15 mg/m² docetaxel once per week. Cohort B included patients with extranodal extension who received the same treatment plus a simultaneous integrated boost to nodal levels with extranodal extension to 36 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions twice per day. The primary end point was locoregional tumor control at 2 years. Secondary end points included 2-year progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, swallow function, and patient-reported QOL.

RESULTS

Accrual was from September 2013 to June 2016 (N = 80; cohort A, n = 37; cohort B, n = 43). Median follow-up was 36 months, with a minimum follow-up of 25 months. The 2-year locoregional tumor control rate was 96.2%, with progression-free survival of 91.1% and overall survival of 98.7%. Rates of grade 3 or worse toxicity at pre-RT and 1 and 2 years post-RT were 2.5%, 0%, and 0%. Swallowing function improved slightly between pre-RT and 12 months post-RT, with one patient requiring temporary feeding tube placement.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive RT de-escalation resulted in locoregional tumor control rates comparable to historical controls, low toxicity, and little decrement in swallowing function or QOL.

Systematic Review of Validated Quality of Life and Swallow Outcomes after Transoral Robotic Surgery

Objective

To systematically review the available evidence on the effects of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) on the posttreatment quality of life (QOL) and swallow function of patients with head and neck cancer.

Data Sources

PubMed and Ovid electronic databases were searched from inception to July 6, 2016. Specific database functions were applied to maximize the search.

Review Methods

Articles in the database were reviewed for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers according to predetermined eligibility criteria. The references of relevant articles were then hand-searched to identify additional manuscripts. For included articles, the study characteristics and relevant data were extracted.

Results

Of 103 articles screened, 20 reporting validated measures of QOL and/or swallow outcomes for 659 patients were eligible for inclusion. Fourteen were observational studies or case series and did not compare the TORS group with another intervention. Two were prospective nonrandomized clinical trials that compared outcomes between TORS and primary chemoradiation. Four were cohort studies comparing TORS with other treatment approaches and modalities, including open surgical approaches and transoral laser microsurgery. Overall, most patients who underwent TORS ± adjuvant therapy reported a return to baseline QOL and swallow function by 6 to 12 months posttreatment. Several studies demonstrated superior QOL and swallowing outcomes when compared with primary chemoradiation or open approaches.

Conclusions

Available evidence suggests that patients who undergo TORS for head and neck cancer have good QOL and swallowing outcomes after treatment, but outcomes are dependent on baseline function, T stage, and adjuvant treatment status.

Primary surgery for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Survival outcomes with or without adjuvant treatment

OBJECTIVES

Human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a unique form of head and neck cancer with improved prognosis. We assessed survival for stage I patients with low- or intermediate-risk pathologic features with surgery alone compared with surgery with adjuvant radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients with stage I HPV+ OPSCC (after restaging with 8th edition staging system) treated with surgery alone, adjuvant RT or CRT in the National Cancer Data Base from 2010 to 2013. We compared survival for low-risk patients (≤1 metastatic lymph nodes with no adverse features) and intermediate-risk patients (2-4 metastatic lymph nodes, microscopic extranodal extension (ENE) or lymphovascular invasion).

RESULTS

We examined 1677 patients with median follow-up of 43.9 months. In the intermediate-risk group, 4-year overall survival was 94.0% with surgery alone, 91.5% with adjuvant RT and 92.0% with adjuvant CRT (p = 0.72). There were similar rates of overall survival in the low-risk group. In multivariable models accounting for clinicopathologic differences the dose of adjuvant RT was not associated with mortality. On Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjuvant RT (HR 0.94; CI 0.43-2.08) or CRT (HR 0.96; CI 0.45-2.11) did not significantly improved survival compared with surgery alone in the intermediate-risk group (reference). Similar results were seen in the low-risk group. The composite number of pathologic risk features significantly improved risk stratification.

CONCLUSION

We provide observational evidence that adjuvant RT or CRT does not provide a survival benefit for stage I HPV+ OPSCC with low- or intermediate-risk pathologic features.

Treatment of Tonsillar Carcinoma following Nononcologic Tonsillectomy: Efficacy of Transoral Robotic Revision Tonsillectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a suitable treatment approach for patients diagnosed with tonsillar carcinoma after a standard palatine tonsillectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care medical center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent TORS at the University of Washington from 2010 to 2017 (n = 150) were identified. All patients who were diagnosed with tonsillar carcinoma following a nononcologic tonsillectomy and subsequently underwent TORS radical tonsillectomy were included (n = 14). Tumor stage-matched subjects (n = 44) were included who did not undergo standard tonsillectomy prior to TORS. Our primary outcome was final margin status. Secondary outcomes were presence of residual tumor, receipt and dose of postoperative adjuvant therapy, disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival. Patients with <6 months of follow-up following definitive treatment were excluded from survival analyses.

RESULTS

Final margin status was clear in all subjects. Residual tumor was not identified in 13 of 14 (92.9%) prior-tonsillectomy subjects following TORS radical tonsillectomy. Seven of 14 (50%) prior-tonsillectomy subjects and 12 of 44 (27.3%) TORS-matched subjects did not require adjuvant therapy due to favorable pathology. Among subjects who received post-TORS radiation therapy (RT) at our institution, RT dose reduction was achieved in 3 of 4 (75%) prior-tonsillectomy subjects and 21 of 24 (87.5%) TORS-matched subjects. Ten of 14 (71.4%) prior-tonsillectomy subjects and 31 of 44 (70.5%) TORS-matched subjects avoided post-TORS chemotherapy. DFS was not significantly different ( P = .87) between prior-tonsillectomy and TORS-matched groups, and no subjects died of related disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with tonsillar carcinoma following a prior nononcologic standard palatine tonsillectomy are suitable candidates for revision surgery with TORS radical tonsillectomy.

Treatment preferences in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

The population of survivors with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) is rising. The improved prognosis of this etiologic subset is reflected in new staging guidelines as well as ongoing deintensification trials aiming to preserve excellent survival while decreasing treatment-related toxicities. However, as staging criteria and treatment standards evolve in the era of transoral surgery and deintensification, little is known regarding the needs and treatment preferences of patients with HPV-OPSCC. Herein, the current knowledge regarding treatment preferences and priorities, quality of life and concerns among patients with HPV-OPSCC is reviewed.

Role of the Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) in the Head and Neck Cancer Team

While treatments for head and neck cancer are aimed at curing patients from disease, they can have significant short- and long-term negative impacts on speech and swallowing functions. Research demonstrates that early and frequent involvement of Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) is beneficial to these functions and overall quality of life for head and neck cancer patients. Strategies and tools to optimize communication and safe swallowing are presented in this chapter.

Swallowing after transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: comparison with primary chemoradiotherapy outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Survival equipoise is recognized between the contemporary surgical and oncological approaches to oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treatment. Primary transoral surgery (TOS) options have emerged that utilize either laser or robotic techniques. Our review presents an overview of the evidence available for swallowing outcomes following TOS approaches and compares these with outcomes following primary oncological management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meta-analysis of swallow outcomes following TOS or (chemo)radiotherapy is not possible given the heterogeneity of the available data. There are suggestions of less swallowing impairment following primary TOS, but the favourable selection of patients to these case series must be considered.

SUMMARY

Minimizing swallowing impairment following oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treatment, while ensuring oncological efficacy, should be a priority for head and neck healthcare providers. Primary TOS may offer an advantage to patients, but only through a team approach that considers how adjuvant oncological therapy could be tailored to individuals. High-quality clinical trials are in progress that will inform future practice.

Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective To compare positive margin rates between the 2 most common subsites of oropharyngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS), the base of tongue (BOT) and the tonsil, as well as identify preoperative imaging characteristics that predispose toward positive margins. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care referral center. Subjects and Methods We compared the final and intraoperative positive margin rate between TORS resections for tonsil and BOT oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), as well as the effect of margins on treatment. A blinded neuroradiologist examined the preoperative imaging of BOT tumors to measure their dimensions and patterns of spread and provided a prediction of final margin results. Results Between January 2010 and May 2016, a total of 254 patients underwent TORS for OPSCC. A total of 140 patients who underwent TORS for T1/T2 OPSCC met inclusion criteria. A final positive margin is significantly more likely for BOT tumors than tonsil tumors (19.6% vs 4.5%, respectively, P = .004) and likewise for intraoperative margins of BOT and tonsil tumors (35.3% vs 12.4%, respectively; P = .002). A positive final margin is 10 times more likely to receive chemoradiation compared to a negative margin, controlling for extracapsular spread and nodal status (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-59.6; P = .02). Preoperative imaging characteristics and subjective radiologic examination of BOT tumors did not correlate with final margin status. Conclusion Positive margins are significantly more likely during TORS BOT resections compared to tonsil resections. More research is needed to help surgeons predict which T1/T2 tumors will be difficult to completely extirpate.

Small bowel obstruction after transoral robotic surgery

BACKGROUND

Head and neck surgery is not often considered a risk factor for intestinal ileus and small bowel obstruction. However, many of these patients may have had prior abdominal surgery, a known risk factor for small bowel obstruction, and may be at risk for bowel obstruction after a surgical procedure of the head and neck.

METHODS

We present a case describing a patient who, after undergoing transoral robotic surgery, experienced delayed postoperative ileus and eventual small bowel obstruction requiring exploratory laparotomy and bowel resection.

RESULTS

Although the patient required total parenteral nutrition for several days, he eventually was able to resume tube feeds, and after several months was able to tolerate an oral diet.

CONCLUSION

Although uncommon complications of head and neck surgery, intestinal ileus and small bowel obstruction can develop as the result of stress/inflammation, postoperative narcotic pain medication, and prior abdominal surgery.

Long-term Functional and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transoral Robotic Surgery in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer

Importance

In recent years, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has emerged as a useful treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). In appropriately selected patients, the use of TORS may allow avoidance of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, thereby avoiding the long-term adverse effects of these therapies.

Objective

To compare functional speech, swallowing, and quality-of-life outcomes longitudinally between those undergoing TORS only and those undergoing TORS and adjuvant radiotherapy (TORS+RT) or TORS and chemoradiotherapy (TORS+CRT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, longitudinal cohort study performed from June 1, 2013, through November 31, 2015, included 74 patients undergoing TORS for initial treatment of OPSCC at a single tertiary academic hospital.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data were collected at baseline, postoperatively (7-21 days), at short-term follow-up (6-12 months), and at long-term follow-up (>12 months). The quality-of-life metrics included the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool and the University of Michigan Head and Neck Quality of Life instrument. Data were also collected on tumor staging, surgical and adjuvant therapy details, patient comorbidities, tracheostomy and feeding tube use, and functional speech and swallowing status using the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Results

Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 61.39 [7.99] years; 68 [92%] male). Median long-term follow-up was 21 months (range, 12-36 months). The response rates were 86% (n = 64) postoperatively, 88% (n = 65) at short-term follow-up, and 86% (n = 64) at long-term follow-up. In all 3 groups, there was a significant worsening in pain and all swallowing-related measures postoperatively. There was subsequent improvement over time, with different trajectories observed across the 3 intervention groups. Postoperative dysphagia improved significantly more quickly in the TORS-only group. At long-term follow-up, weight loss differed between the TORS-only and TORS+RT groups (mean difference, -16.1; 97.5% CI, -29.8 to -2.4) and the TORS-only and TORS+CRT groups (mean difference, -14.6; 97.5% CI, -29.2 to 0) in a clinically meaningful way. In addition, the TORS-only group had significantly better scores than the TORS+CRT group on the Performance Status Scale-Eating in Public scale (mean difference, 21.8; 97.5% CI, 4.3-39.2) and Head and Neck Quality of Life-Eating scale (mean difference, 21.2; 97.5% CI, 4.0-38.3).

Conclusions and Relevance

Patients who underwent TORS+CRT demonstrated poorer long-term outcomes, with continued dysphagia more than 1 year after surgery. These findings support the investigation of adjuvant de-escalation therapies to reduce the long-term adverse effects of treatment.

Current Role of Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer

The 1990s saw an increased use of chemoradiotherapy protocols, commonly referred to as organ-sparing therapy, for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer after the Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête et Cou trial. Since that time, human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has been identified as a unique disease, with improved survival regardless of treatment modality. The improved outcomes of this population has led to re-evaluation of treatment paradigms in the past decade, with a desire to spare young, human papillomavirus-positive patients the treatment-related toxicities of chemoradiotherapy and to use new minimally invasive surgical techniques to improve outcomes. Numerous retrospective and prospective studies have investigated the role of surgery in treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma and have demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes and improved functional outcomes compared with chemoradiotherapy protocols. Ongoing and future clinical trials may help delineate the role of surgery in the future.

Quality of life outcomes of transoral robotic surgery with or without adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To compare quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) alone, with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), or adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCCA).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for 111 patients treated for OPSCCA from 2008 to 2015. Patients were administered the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI) to evaluate QOL preoperatively, and at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postsurgery. QOL data were compared between 13 patients treated with TORS alone, 31 with adjuvant RT, and 67 with adjuvant CRT by a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 35 months. The HNCI response rates at 3 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months were 80%, 60%, 55%, and 46%, respectively. TORS alone reported significantly higher eating scores than adjuvant RT or CRT at 3 and 6 months, and higher speech scores compared to adjuvant CRT at 3 months and adjuvant RT at 6 months. TORS alone and adjuvant RT reported less social disruption compared to adjuvant CRT at 3 months. Adjuvant CRT had consistently lower overall QOL scores until 6 months. No TORS-alone patient required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and no study patient required tracheostomy during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TORS alone maintained higher QOL than adjuvant RT or CRT in eating, social function, speech, and overall QOL postsurgery. QOL and functional metrics were better for 6 months in TORS-alone patients, and at 12 months, the differences were not significant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:403-411, 2018.

Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery (eHNS) for minor salivary gland tumors of the oropharynx

Background

Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery (eHNS), including transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS), provides access to subsites in the head and neck that have traditionally been difficult to approach. Minor salivary gland tumors, while relatively uncommon, are frequently malignant and can occur at sites in the oropharynx accessible by transoral eHNS. Presented here is the largest review to date of patients with minor salivary gland tumors of the oropharynx managed with transoral eHNS as primary or salvage therapy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed, including data from 20 patients with minor salivary gland tumors of the oropharynx managed with transoral eHNS at 2 tertiary, academic medical centers. Details of tumor pathology, margin analysis, adjuvant therapy, and an assessment of oncologic outcome were included.

Results

The base of tongue was the most common tumor site (75%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) accounted for most cases (35%), and negative margins were obtained in most (95%) through an endoscopic-only approach. Overall, 50% of patients received post-operative radiation therapy. Postoperative complications were limited, with one patient (5%) returning to the OR for control of post-operative oropharyngeal bleeding. On average follow-up of 36 months, 90% of patients were alive with no evidence of recurrence.

Conclusion

In this experience, transoral eHNS provided a safe and consistent surgical approach to management of minor salivary gland malignancies, with low complication rates and good locoregional control. Thus, transoral eHNS may play a valuable role in the multi-disciplinary management of these malignancies.

Trial registration number

None/not applicable

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41199-017-0024-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A prospective evaluation of short-term dysphagia after transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been associated with improved long-term dysphagia symptomatology compared with chemoradiation. Dysphagia in the perioperative period has been inadequately characterized. The objective of this study was to characterize short-term swallowing outcomes after TORS for OPSCC.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were enrolled prospectively. The Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10) was used as a measure of swallowing dysfunction (score >2) and was administered on postoperative day (POD) 1, 7, and 30. Patient demographics, weight, pain level, and clinical outcomes were recorded prospectively and focused on time to oral diet, feeding tube placement, and dysphagia-related readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were included with pathologic T stages of T1 (n = 24), T2 (n = 20), T3 (n = 3), and Tx (n = 4). Self-reported preoperative dysphagia was unusual (13.7%). The mean EAT-10 score on POD 1 was lower than on POD 7 (21.5 vs 26.6; P = .005) but decreased by POD 30 (26.1 to 12.2; P < .001). Forty-seven (92.1%) patients were discharged on an oral diet, but 57.4% required compensatory strategies or modification of liquid consistency. Ninety-eight percent of patients were taking an oral diet by POD 30. There were no dysphagia-related readmissions.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study shows that most patients who undergo TORS experience dysphagia for at least the first month postoperatively, but nearly all can be started on an oral diet. The dysphagia-associated complication profile is acceptable after TORS with a minority of patients requiring temporary feeding tube placement. Aggressive evaluation and management of postoperative dysphagia in TORS patients may help prevent dysphagia-associated readmissions. Cancer 2017;123:3132-40. © 2017 American Cancer Society.