1
|
Tokita HK, Assel M, Serafin J, Lin E, Sarraf L, Masson G, Moo TA, Nelson JA, Simon BA, Vickers AJ. Optimizing accrual to a large-scale, clinically integrated randomized trial in anesthesiology: A 2-year analysis of recruitment. Clin Trials 2024:17407745241255087. [PMID: 38895970 DOI: 10.1177/17407745241255087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performing large randomized trials in anesthesiology is often challenging and costly. The clinically integrated randomized trial is characterized by simplified logistics embedded into routine clinical practice, enabling ease and efficiency of recruitment, offering an opportunity for clinicians to conduct large, high-quality randomized trials under low cost. Our aims were to (1) demonstrate the feasibility of the clinically integrated trial design in a high-volume anesthesiology practice and (2) assess whether trial quality improvement interventions led to more balanced accrual among study arms and improved trial compliance over time. METHODS This is an interim analysis of recruitment to a cluster-randomized trial investigating three nerve block approaches for mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction: paravertebral block (arm 1), paravertebral plus interpectoral plane blocks (arm 2), and serratus anterior plane plus interpectoral plane blocks (arm 3). We monitored accrual and consent rates, clinician compliance with the randomized treatment, and availability of outcome data. Assessment after the initial year of implementation showed a slight imbalance in study arms suggesting areas for improvement in trial compliance. Specific improvement interventions included increasing the frequency of communication with the consenting staff and providing direct feedback to clinician investigators about their individual recruitment patterns. We assessed overall accrual rates and tested for differences in accrual, consent, and compliance rates pre- and post-improvement interventions. RESULTS Overall recruitment was extremely high, accruing close to 90% of the eligible population. In the pre-intervention period, there was evidence of bias in the proportion of patients being accrued and receiving the monthly block, with higher rates in arm 3 (90%) compared to arms 1 (81%) and 2 (79%, p = 0.021). In contrast, in the post-intervention period, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.8). Eligible for randomization rate increased from 89% in the pre-intervention period to 95% in the post-intervention period (difference 5.7%; 95% confidence interval = 2.2%-9.4%, p = 0.002). Consent rate increased from 95% to 98% (difference of 3.7%; 95% confidence interval = 1.1%-6.3%; p = 0.004). Compliance with the randomized nerve block approach was maintained at close to 100% and availability of primary outcome data was 100%. CONCLUSION The clinically integrated randomized trial design enables rapid trial accrual with a high participant compliance rate in a high-volume anesthesiology practice. Continuous monitoring of accrual, consent, and compliance rates is necessary to maintain and improve trial conduct and reduce potential biases. This trial methodology serves as a template for the implementation of other large, low-cost randomized trials in anesthesiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanae K Tokita
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joanna Serafin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leslie Sarraf
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geema Masson
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brett A Simon
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cracchiolo JR, Tin AL, Assel M, McCready TM, Stabile C, Simon B, Carlsson SV, Vickers AJ, Laudone V. Electronic Patient-Reported Symptoms After Ambulatory Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:554-561. [PMID: 38477892 PMCID: PMC10938249 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Importance Complex cancer procedures are now performed in the ambulatory surgery setting. Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can identify patients at risk for acute hospital encounters. Defining normal recovery is needed to set patient expectations and optimize clinical team responses to manage evolving problems in real time. Objective To describe the patterns of postoperative recovery among patients undergoing ambulatory cancer surgery with RSM using an ePRO platform-the Recovery Tracker. Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent 1 of 5 of the most common procedures (prostatectomy, nephrectomy, mastectomy, hysterectomy, or thyroidectomy) at the Josie Robertson Surgery Center at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from September 2016 to June 2022. Patients completed the Recovery Tracker, a brief ePRO platform assessing symptoms for 10 days after surgery. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to May 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Symptom severity and interference were estimated by postoperative day and procedure. Results A total of 12 433 patients were assigned 110 936 surveys. Of these patients, 7874 (63%) were female, and the median (IQR) age at surgery was 57 (47-65) years. The survey response rate was 87% (10 814 patients responding to at least 1 of 10 daily surveys). Among patients who submitted at least 1 survey, the median (IQR) number of surveys submitted was 7 (4-8), and each assessment took a median (IQR) of 1.7 (1.2-2.5) minutes to complete. Symptom burden was modest in this population, with the highest severity on postoperative days 1 to 3. Pain was moderate initially and steadily improved. Fatigue was reported by 6120 patients (57%) but was rarely severe. Maximum pain and fatigue responses (very severe) were reported by 324 of 10 814 patients (3%) and 106 of 10 814 patients (1%), respectively. The maximum pain severity (severe or very severe) was highest after nephrectomy (92 of 332 [28%]), followed by mastectomy with reconstruction (817 of 3322 [25%]) and prostatectomy (744 of 3543 [21%]). Nausea (occasionally, frequently, or almost constantly) was common and experienced on multiple days by 1485 of 9300 patients (16%), but vomiting was less common (139 of 10 812 [1%]). Temperature higher than 38 °C was reported by 740 of 10 812 (7%). Severe or very severe shortness of breath was reported by 125 of 10 813 (1%). Conclusions and Relevance Defining detailed postoperative symptom burden through this analysis provides valuable data to inform further implementation and maintenance of RSM programs in surgical oncology patients. These data can enhance patient education, set expectations, and support research to allow iterative improvement of clinical care based on the patient-reported experience after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R. Cracchiolo
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy L. Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Taylor M. McCready
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Cara Stabile
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Brett Simon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sigrid V. Carlsson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andrew J. Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu JJ, Tadros AB, Vingan PS, Assel MJ, McCready TM, Vickers AJ, Carlsson S, Morrow M, Mehrara BJ, Stern CS, Pusic AL, Nelson JA. Remote Symptom Monitoring with Clinical Alerts Following Mastectomy: Do Early Symptoms Predict 30-Day Surgical Complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3377-3386. [PMID: 38355780 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15031-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for real-time remote symptom monitoring facilitate early recognition of postoperative complications. We sought to determine whether remote, electronic, patient-reported symptom-monitoring with Recovery Tracker predicts 30-day readmission or reoperation in outpatient mastectomy patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of breast cancer patients who underwent outpatient (< 24-h stay) mastectomy with or without reconstruction from April 2017 to January 2022 and who received the Recovery Tracker on Days 1-10 postoperatively. Of 5,130 patients, 3,888 met the inclusion criteria (2,880 mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and 1,008 mastectomy only). We focused on symptoms concerning for surgical complications and assessed if symptoms reaching prespecified alert levels-prompting a nursing call-predicted risk of 30-day readmission or reoperation. RESULTS Daily Recovery Tracker response rates ranged from 45% to 70%. Overall, 1,461 of 3,888 patients (38%) triggered at least one alert. Most red (urgent) alerts were triggered by pain and fever; most yellow (less urgent) alerts were triggered by wound redness and pain severity. The 30-day readmission and reoperation rates were low at 3.8% and 2.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between symptom alerts and 30-day reoperation or readmission, and a clinically relevant increase in risk can be excluded (odds ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.46; p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction in the ambulatory setting have a low burden of concerning symptoms, even in the first few days after surgery. Patients can be reassured that symptoms that do present resolve quickly thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline J Chu
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Perri S Vingan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa J Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taylor M McCready
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid Carlsson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babak J Mehrara
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carrie S Stern
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu JB, Bates DW. Patient-reported outcome measures in emergency and acute care: looking beyond the emergency room. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2024; 11:1-5. [PMID: 38286497 PMCID: PMC11009703 DOI: 10.15441/ceem.23.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jason B. Liu
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience (PROVE) Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W. Bates
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Quality Analysis, Information Systems, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hartup S, Briggs M. Managing chronic pain after breast cancer treatments: are web-based interventions the future? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2024; 18:47-54. [PMID: 38170201 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Chronic post-treatment pain in breast cancer affects a high proportion of patients. Symptom burden and financial costs are increasingly impacting patients and healthcare systems because of improved treatments and survival rates. Supporting long-term breast cancer symptoms using novel methodology has been examined, yet few have explored the opportunity to utilise these interventions for prevention. This review aims to explore the need for, range of, and effectiveness of such interventions. RECENT FINDINGS Three papers describe risk factors for chronic pain, with six recent papers describing the use of interventions for acute pain in the surgical setting. The evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions to improve pain management in this setting is limited but tentatively positive. The results have to take into account the variation between systems and limited testing. SUMMARY Multiple types of intervention emerged and appear well accepted by patients. Most assessed short-term impact and did not evaluate for reduction in chronic pain. Such interventions require rigorous effectiveness testing to meet the growing needs of post-treatment pain in breast cancer. A detailed understanding of components of web-based interventions and their individual impact on acute pain and chronic pain is needed within future optimisation trials. Their effectiveness as preventative tools are yet to be decided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Hartup
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds
| | - Michelle Briggs
- Pain Research Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Science University of Liverpool
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fearon NJ, Kurtzman J, Benfante N, Assel M, Vickers A, Carlsson S, Laudone VP, Levine M, Simon BA, Mehrara BJ, Nelson JA. Reducing opioid prescribing after ambulatory breast reconstruction surgery. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1235-1242. [PMID: 37653689 PMCID: PMC10841230 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lack of evidence-based guidelines for postoperative opioid prescriptions following breast reconstruction contributes to a wide variation in prescribing practices and increases potential for misuse and abuse. METHODS Between August and December 2019, women who underwent outpatient breast reconstruction were surveyed 7-10 days before (n = 97) and after (n = 101) implementing a standardized opioid prescription reduction initiative. We compared postoperative opioid use, pain control, and refills in both groups. Patient reported outcomes were compared using the BREAST-Q physical wellbeing of the chest domain and a novel symptom Recovery Tracker. RESULTS Before changes in prescriptions, patients were prescribed a median of 30 pills and consumed three pills (interquartile range [IQR: 1,9]). After standardization, patients were prescribed eight pills and consumed three pills (IQR: 1,6). There was no evidence of a difference in the proportion of patients experiencing moderate to very severe pain on the Recovery Tracker or in the early BREAST-Q physical wellbeing of the chest scores (p = 0.8 and 0.3, respectively). CONCLUSION Standardizing and reducing opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery is feasible and can significantly decrease the number of excess pills prescribed. The was no adverse impact on early physical wellbeing, although larger studies are needed to obtain further data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nkechi J. Fearon
- Josie Robertson Surgical Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joey Kurtzman
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sigrid Carlsson
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden
| | - Vincent P. Laudone
- Josie Robertson Surgical Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marcia Levine
- Josie Robertson Surgical Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brett A. Simon
- Josie Robertson Surgical Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Babak J. Mehrara
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonas A. Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Govindaraj R, Agar M, Currow D, Luckett T. Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e48483. [PMID: 38015606 PMCID: PMC10716761 DOI: 10.2196/48483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The routine measurement of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical care using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is gaining momentum worldwide. However, a deep understanding of the mechanisms underpinning ePROM interventions that could inform their optimal design to improve health outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the implicit mechanisms that underpin the effectiveness of ePROM interventions and develop program theories about how and when ePROM interventions improve health outcomes. METHODS A realist synthesis of the literature about ePROM interventions in cancer clinical care was performed. A conceptual framework of ePROM interventions was constructed to define the scope of the review and frame the initial program theories. Literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, supplemented by citation tracking, were performed to identify relevant literature to develop, refine, and test program theories. Quality appraisal of relevant studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Overall, 61 studies were included in the realist synthesis: 15 (25%) mixed methods studies, 9 (15%) qualitative studies, 13 (21%) descriptive studies, 21 (34%) randomized controlled trials, and 3 (5%) quasi-experimental studies. In total, 3 initial program theories were developed regarding the salient components of ePROM interventions-remote self-reporting, real-time feedback to clinicians, and clinician-patient telecommunication. The refined theories posit that remote self-reporting enables patients to recognize and report symptoms accurately and empowers them to communicate these to clinicians, real-time feedback prompts clinicians to manage symptoms proactively, and clinician-patient telephone interactions and e-interactions between clinic encounters improve symptom management by reshaping how clinicians and patients communicate. However, the intervention may not achieve the intended benefit if ePROMs become a reminder to patients of their illness and are not meaningful to them and when real-time feedback to clinicians lacks relevance and increases the workload. CONCLUSIONS The key to improving health outcomes through ePROM interventions is enabling better symptom reporting and communication through remote symptom self-reporting, promoting proactive management of symptoms through real-time clinician feedback, and facilitating clinician-patient interactions. Patient engagement with self-reporting and clinician engagement in responding to feedback are vital and may reinforce each other in improving outcomes. Effective ePROM interventions might fundamentally alter how clinicians and patients interact between clinic encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramkumar Govindaraj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Currow
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Plotsker EL, Coriddi MR, Rubenstein RN, Chu JJ, Haglich K, Disa JJ, Matros E, Dayan JH, Allen RJ, Nelson JA. Air versus Saline in Initial Prepectoral Tissue Expansion: A Comparison of Complications and Perioperative Patient-Reported Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:25S-34S. [PMID: 36995181 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One option to optimize prepectoral tissue expander fill volume while minimizing stress on mastectomy skin flaps is to use air as an initial fill medium, with subsequent exchange to saline during postoperative expansion. The authors compared complications and early patient-reported outcomes (PROs) based on fill type in prepectoral breast reconstruction patients. METHODS Prepectoral breast reconstruction patients who underwent intraoperative tissue expansion with air or saline from 2018 to 2020 were reviewed to assess fill-type utilization. The primary endpoint was expander loss; secondary endpoints included seroma, hematoma, infection/cellulitis, full-thickness mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, expander exposure, and capsular contracture. PROs were assessed with the BREAST-Q Physical Well-Being of the Chest scale 2 weeks postoperatively. Propensity-matching was performed as a secondary analysis. RESULTS Of 560 patients (928 expanders) included in the analysis, 372 had devices initially filled with air (623 expanders), and 188 with saline (305 expanders). No differences were observed for overall rates of expander loss (4.7% versus 3.0%, P = 0.290) or overall complications (22.5% versus 17.7%, P = 0.103). No difference in BREAST-Q scores was observed ( P = 0.142). Utilization of air-filled expanders decreased substantially over the last study year. After propensity matching, no differences in loss, other complications, or PROs were observed across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Tissue expanders initially filled with air seem to have no significant advantage over saline-filled expanders in maintaining mastectomy skin flap viability or PROs, including after propensity matching. These findings can help guide choice of initial tissue expander fill type. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan L Plotsker
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Michelle R Coriddi
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Robyn N Rubenstein
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Jacqueline J Chu
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Kathryn Haglich
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Joseph J Disa
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Evan Matros
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Joseph H Dayan
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Robert J Allen
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simon NB, Assel M, Serafin J, McCready TM, Nelson JA, Vickers AJ, Moo TA, Tokita HK. Patient and procedure characteristics associated with postoperative pain after prophylactic versus therapeutic ambulatory bilateral breast surgery. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:719-725. [PMID: 37293694 PMCID: PMC10530122 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We investigated whether age, body mass index (BMI), and tissue expander placement were related to postoperative opioid requirement for patients undergoing therapeutic versus prophylactic breast surgery. METHODS Postoperative opioid consumption was evaluated for patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction at a freestanding ambulatory cancer surgery center between 2016 and 2021. Ordinal regression tested whether surgical indication was associated with increased postoperative opioid requirements after adjusting for age, BMI, and tissue expander placement. RESULTS Of 2447 patients, 6% underwent prophylactic surgeries. Therapeutic mastectomy patients had lower postoperative opioid requirement (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91; p = 0.030), but this was not significant after adjusting for covariates (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.53-1.07; p = 0.2). Opioid use increased with higher BMI (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.05-1.08; p < 0.001) and decreased with age (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98; p < 0.001) with therapeutic mastectomy patients being older (median 46 vs. 39). The subpectoral tissue expander group had nearly double the postoperative opioid requirement compared to prepectoral placement (OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.55-2.23; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Increased postoperative opioid requirement in women undergoing prophylactic procedures is best explained by age. Mastectomy patients should be counseled similarly about postoperative pain irrespective of indication. A larger prophylactic mastectomy sample is required to provide more precise estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa Assel
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joanna Serafin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Taylor M McCready
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hanae K Tokita
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sánchez JC, Nuñez-García B, Ruano-Ravina A, Blanco M, Martín-Vegue AR, Royuela A, Cantos B, Méndez M, Calvo V, Provencio M. Patterns and outcome of unplanned care in lung cancer patients: an observational study in a medical oncology department. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2023; 12:1752-1765. [PMID: 37691863 PMCID: PMC10483072 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-23-48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Background There is increasing interest in unplanned care utilization among lung cancer patients and its evaluation should allow the identification of areas for quality improvement. Being a major priority for transformation in oncology, we aim to measure the risk and burden of unplanned care in a medical oncology department and identify factors that determine acute care. Methods This was an observational retrospective cohort study that included all lung cancer patients treated at Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital between January 1st 2016 and December 31st 2020. Data cut off: June 30th, 2021. The main objective was to assess the incidence of unplanned care, emergency department (ED) visits and unplanned hospital admissions, from the first visit to the medical oncology service and its potential conditioning variables, considering patient death as a competitive event. As secondary objectives, a description and a quality of unplanned care evaluation was carried out. Results A total of 821 lung cancer patients, all histologies and stages, were included (median follow-up: 32.8 months). Six hundred and eighty-one patients required consultation in the ED (82.9%), and 558 required an unplanned admission (68%). Eighty-six percent of ED consultations and 80.9% of unplanned hospital admissions were related to cancer or its treatment. The 1-year cumulative incidence for ED consultation and for unplanned hospital admission was 71.3% (95% CI: 67.8-74.5%) and 56.7% (95% CI: 53-60%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, a higher tumor stage increased the risk of consultation in the ED, while a higher stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 compared to ECOG PS 0, male sex, opioid or steroid use at first consultation increased the risk of unplanned admission. Conclusions Our study shows that lung cancer patients have an extremely high demand for unplanned care. It is an early need and related to cancer in the majority of consultations and admissions and therefore a key issue for the management of oncology departments. We must optimize the follow-up of patients with a higher risk of unplanned care, advanced lung cancer or symptomatic patients, incorporating remote monitoring strategies and early interventions, as developing specific urgent care pathways for a better comprehensive cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C. Sánchez
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Nuñez-García
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Ruano-Ravina
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariola Blanco
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arturo Ramos Martín-Vegue
- Admission and Clinical Documentation Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Royuela
- Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHISA, CIBERESP, ISCIII, Madrid, España
| | - Blanca Cantos
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miriam Méndez
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Virginia Calvo
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariano Provencio
- Medical Oncology Department, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cracchiolo JR, Arafat W, Atreja A, Bruckner L, Emamekhoo H, Heinrichs T, Raldow AC, Smerage J, Stetson P, Sugalski J, Tevaarwerk AJ. Getting ready for real-world use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for patients with cancer: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network ePRO Workgroup paper. Cancer 2023; 129:2441-2449. [PMID: 37224181 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Electronic patient‐reported outcome (ePRO) programs may offer advantages for patients with cancer, clinicians, health care systems, payors, and society in general; but developing and maintaining an ePRO program will require cancer centers to navigate defining meaningful problems, collecting ePROs, implementing action when those ePROs require intervention without over‐burdening clinicians, and monitoring the successes and failures of their ePRO programs. Physician informaticists from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Electronic Health Record Advisory Group offer 10 guiding principles to consider when contemplating, building, or refining an ePRO program for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Waddah Arafat
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ashish Atreja
- University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Lauren Bruckner
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Hamid Emamekhoo
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Tricia Heinrichs
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- University of California-Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey Smerage
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Peter Stetson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Sugalski
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Feinberg J, Zivanovic O, Hannon M, McCready T, Desai P, Kim SH, Aviki EM, Mueller JJ, Jewell EL, Roche KL, Gardner GJ, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Brown CL, Abu-Rustum NR, Cracchiolo JR, Leitao MM, Broach V. Patient-reported symptoms after minimally invasive hysterectomy and association with postoperative complications. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 175:163-168. [PMID: 37390597 PMCID: PMC10939506 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe patient-reported postoperative symptoms and to evaluate the use of digital symptom tracking and alerts to detect postoperative complications. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy and enrolled in our Recovery Tracker program from 4/5/17-12/31/21. The Recovery Tracker is an at-home virtual tool used to track patient-reported postoperative symptoms for 10 days. Predefined thresholds for "red" and "yellow" alerts are based on symptom severity and timing. Data on patient demographics, surgery, and postoperative course were collected to evaluate the association of alerts with complications and compare outcomes of patients who did/did not enroll in the program. RESULTS Of 2362 eligible patients, 1694 (71.7%) enrolled in the Recovery Tracker program. Pain was the most severe symptom, followed by fatigue. Eighty-seven patients experienced 102 complications (5.1% complication rate) and 32 experienced 39 grade ≥ 2 complications (1.9% severe complication rate). Excluding complications that occurred prior to Recovery Tracker use, 1673 patients experienced 28 grade ≥ 2 complications. Of 345 patients (20.6%) who triggered a red alert, 13 (3.8%) had a grade ≥ 2 complication. Of 1328 patients (79.4%) with no red alerts, 15 (1.13%) had a grade ≥ 2 complication. Relative risk of a grade ≥ 2 complication if a red alert was triggered was 3.25 (95% CI: 1.6-6.9, P = .002). Rate of severe complications was significantly higher among patients who did not use the tool (3.3% vs 1.9%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS The Recovery Tracker tool may assist in early identification of postoperative symptoms after minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Feinberg
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Hannon
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Center, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taylor McCready
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priyanka Desai
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emeline M Aviki
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol L Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer R Cracchiolo
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McCready TM, Stabile C, Vickers A, Ancker JS, Pusic A, Temple LK, Simon BA, Carter J. A Remote Symptom Monitoring Tool As Part of Ambulatory Cancer Surgery Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Experience. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:595-601. [PMID: 37235840 PMCID: PMC10424896 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients recovering from ambulatory cancer surgery at home may find it difficult to determine whether their postoperative symptoms are normal or potentially serious. We developed the Recovery Tracker to help patients navigate such issues. The Recovery Tracker is a 10-day, web-based electronic survey that monitors symptoms daily and provides feedback as to whether reported symptoms are expected or require follow-up. We sought to examine patient perceptions using this tool. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted from August 2017 to September 2019 with a convenience sample of patients from a larger randomized controlled trial of the Recovery Tracker. Patients undergoing surgery at an ambulatory cancer center dedicated to the surgical treatment of breast, gynecologic, urologic, head, and neck cancers and benign tumors were included. Thematic analysis was applied to derive key themes and codes via NVivo qualitative analysis software. Recruitment was conducted iteratively until thematic saturation. RESULTS Forty-three patients were interviewed. Interview responses were organized into five main themes: (1) The Recovery Tracker led to more seamless communication with the care team; (2) symptoms not expected or not listed on the Recovery Tracker caused stress; (3) the Recovery Tracker was perceived as an extension of care, prompting reflection about symptoms and recovery; (4) Enhanced Feedback provided reassurance and helped set expectations; and (5) the Recovery Tracker was easy to use. CONCLUSION The patient experience of electronic symptom monitoring and feedback is congruent with the aims of such monitoring and feedback. Further qualitative research is required in more diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor M. McCready
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Current Address: Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Cara Stabile
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jessica S. Ancker
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | - Andrea Pusic
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Larissa K.F. Temple
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Brett A. Simon
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Jeanne Carter
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Psychology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Basch E, Rocque G, Mody G, Mullangi S, Patt D. Tenets for Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Remote Symptom Monitoring During Cancer Treatment. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2200187. [PMID: 36857630 DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptoms are common in patients receiving systemic treatment for metastatic cancer. Monitoring patients with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) detects severe and worsening symptoms early, enabling care teams to intervene and prevent downstream complications and thereby improving outcomes. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will require patient-reported outcome (PRO) monitoring in the upcoming Enhancing Oncology Model, and many practices will likely attempt to implement PROs in patient care for the first time. METHODS To assist practices with the design and implementation of ePRO remote symptom monitoring programs, tenets were drawn from prior ePRO program experiences and research. RESULTS Successful implementation requires a quality improvement approach to change management with attention to software functionality, measured outcomes, personnel deployment, leadership and culture, workflow, equity, and patient engagement. Specific approaches in each of these areas can optimize program participation and effectiveness. Continuous program monitoring to identify and address barriers is essential to success. Initial challenges with personnel acceptance and patient participation are common and can be overcome by using these tenets. CONCLUSION Remote symptom monitoring with ePROs is a key component of quality cancer care and population health management that requires organizational commitment and a deliberate approach by practices using established tenets to assure successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Basch
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Gita Mody
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu TJ, Tokita HK, Simon BA. An Enhanced Ambulatory Surgery Experience for Patients with Cancer Through End-to-End Patient Engagement. Adv Anesth 2022; 40:33-44. [PMID: 36333050 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) serve an important role for hospital systems of increasing operating capacity and offloading patient volume. When seeking to perform more complex cancer surgeries at an ASC, a systematic approach with care pathways can yield success by facilitating quick recovery for patients and reducing complication rates. End-to-end patient engagement is a key component of patient-centered care at the Josie Robertson Surgery Center and begins the moment the decision to have surgery is made and extends to the postdischarge period to track recovery. Engagement includes comprehensive education, standardization of processes, and setting clear expectations for recovery and discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd J Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, M-309, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Hanae K Tokita
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1133 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Brett A Simon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1133 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comment on: "A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Electronic Outpatient Symptom Monitoring After Ambulatory Cancer Surgery". Ann Surg 2022; 276:e1121-e1123. [PMID: 35793457 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
17
|
Srour MK, Tadros AB, Sevilimedu V, Nelson JA, Cracchiolo JR, McCready TM, Silva N, Moo TA, Morrow M. Who Are We Missing: Does Engagement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Cancer Vary by Age, Race, or Disease Stage? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7964-7973. [PMID: 36149608 PMCID: PMC10328095 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12477-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are used to assess value-based care. Little is known as to whether PROM response in breast cancer reflects the diverse patient population. The BREAST-Q, a validated measure of satisfaction and quality of life, and Recovery Tracker, a postoperative assessment tool, are PROM routinely delivered to all patients undergoing breast surgery at our institution. Here we determine whether response to PROM differs by age, race, language, or disease stage. METHODS All patients who had a breast operation between January 2020 and July 2021 were requested to complete the BREAST-Q and Recovery Tracker. Non-responders did not complete the PROM at any timepoint; responders completed 1 or more. Primary outcomes included rates of non-response versus response overall. RESULTS Of 6374 patients identified, 5653 (88.7%) responded to either PROM [4366/4751 (91.9%) BREAST-Q; 2746/3384 (81.1%) Recovery Tracker]. On univariate analysis, non-responders were older (60 years versus 55 years, p < 0.001) and more often non-English speaking (p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.031), and Black race (p < 0.001), versus responders. On multivariate analysis, non-responders were significantly more often Black race and non-English speaking (p < 0.001). Non-English speakers were significantly less responsive among all ethnicities and races except Black race. Although breast cancer stage did not reach significance for response, patients with malignant disease and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy responded more often. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate high patient engagement using 2 different PROM following breast surgery, but suggest that PROM results may not reflect the experience of the entire breast cancer population. Care process changes based solely on PROM should consider these findings to ensure that the views of the entire spectrum of patients with breast cancer are represented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa K Srour
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Audree B Tadros
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer R Cracchiolo
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taylor M McCready
- Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Silva
- Department of Strategy and Innovation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Strachna O, Asan O, Stetson PD. Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study. JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10:e38483. [PMID: 36326801 PMCID: PMC9672998 DOI: 10.2196/38483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remote monitoring programs based on the collection of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are being increasingly adopted in oncology practices. Although PROs are a great source of patient data, the management of critical PRO data is not discussed in detail in the literature. OBJECTIVE This first-of-its-kind study aimed to design, describe, and evaluate a closed-loop alerting and communication system focused on managing PRO-related alerts in cancer care. METHODS We designed and developed a novel solution using an agile software development methodology by incrementally building new capabilities. We evaluated these new features using participatory design and the Fit between Individuals, Task, and Technology framework. RESULTS A total of 8 questionnaires were implemented using alerting features, resulting in an alert rate of 7.82% (36,838/470,841) with 13.28% (10,965/82,544) of the patients triggering at least one alert. Alerts were reviewed by 501 staff members spanning across 191 care teams. All the alerts were reviewed with a median response time of 1 hour (SD 185 hours) during standard business hours. The most severe (red) alerts were documented 56.83% (2592/4561) of the time, whereas unlabeled alerts were documented 27.68% (1298/4689) of the time, signaling clinician concordance with the alert thresholds. CONCLUSIONS A PRO-based alert and communication system has some initial benefits in reviewing clinically meaningful PRO data in a reasonable amount of time. We have discussed key system design considerations, workflow integration, and the mitigation of potential impact on the burden of care teams. The introduction of a PRO-based alert and communication system provides a reliable mechanism for care teams to review and respond to patient symptoms quickly. The system was standardized across many different oncology settings, demonstrating system flexibility. Future studies should focus on formally evaluating system usability through qualitative methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Strachna
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States
- Division of Digital Products and Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Onur Asan
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States
| | - Peter D Stetson
- Division of Digital Products and Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diehl TM, Barrett JR, Van Doorn R, Cherney Stafford LM, Hanlon BM, Weber SM, Voils CI, Abbott DE. Promoting patient engagement during care transitions after surgery using mobile technology: Lessons learned from the MobiMD pilot study. Surgery 2022; 172:219-225. [PMID: 35086727 PMCID: PMC11064743 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poorly coordinated transitions of care in complex abdominal surgery patients contribute to frequent hospital readmissions and inflated healthcare spending. Mobile health (mHealth) transitional care technologies may reduce surgical readmissions yet remain understudied in high-risk surgical populations. METHODS We conducted a single-group, prepost study of a mHealth transitional care app in 50 complex surgical patients. Eligible patients were adults undergoing complex abdominal surgery in the divisions of Surgical Oncology and Colorectal Surgery. The main outcome was app engagement, calculated by notification response rate (number of participant-entered datapoints divided by the total number of app-requested datapoints) over the 30-day postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included changes in engagement over time and by individual app feature. RESULTS A total of 85% (50/59) of eligible patients enrolled. Most participants were male (58%, n = 29), and mean age was 50 years (range 24-80 years). Overall notification response rate was 28%. Among the 58% of participants (29/50) who engaged with the app at least once after discharge (app users), the average notification response rate was 45%. The mean notification response rate among app users decreased over time from 50% to 32% between weeks 1 and 4 after hospital discharge. Engagement with individual app features ranged from 48-81%, with highest engagement for symptom reports and lowest engagement for wound care instructions. CONCLUSION mHealth transitional care is feasible in complex surgical patients using only patients' existing smart devices. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine the impact on hospital readmissions, surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and overall resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Diehl
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. http://www.twitter.com/tomdiehlMD
| | - James R Barrett
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Rachel Van Doorn
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Linda M Cherney Stafford
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Bret M Hanlon
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Corrine I Voils
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI. http://www.twitter.com/VoilsCorrine
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Emery A, Houchens N, Gupta A. Quality and Safety in the Literature: May 2022. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31:409-414. [PMID: 35440499 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Emery
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nathan Houchens
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ashwin Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lessons for Oncology From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Operationalizing and Scaling Virtual Cancer Care in Health Systems. Cancer J 2022; 28:125-133. [PMID: 35333498 PMCID: PMC9158540 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT After several decades of slow expansion, the use of virtual care in oncology rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from cancer centers across the country show that most patients and providers were satisfied with components of virtual care, and virtual care may be able to improve access to care. However, the rapid implementation of programs during the pandemic worsened disparities in access to virtual care. Health systems must develop strategies to monitor quality, support patients and providers, promote health equity, and overcome regulatory challenges to successfully deliver care in hybrid systems that combine in-person and virtual care.
Collapse
|
22
|
Enhancing Patient-Centered Surgical Care With Mobile Health Technology. J Surg Res 2022; 274:178-184. [PMID: 35180494 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
From smartphones or wearables to portable physiologic sensors and apps, healthcare is witnessing an exponential growth in mHealth-digital health tools used to support medical and surgical care, as well as public health. In surgery, there is interest in harnessing the capabilities of mHealth to improve the quality of patient-centered care delivery. Digitally delivered surveys have enhanced patient-reported outcome measurement and patient engagement throughout care. Wearable devices and sensors have allowed for the assessment of physical fitness before surgery and during recovery. Smartphone-based digital phenotyping has introduced novel methods of integrating multiple data streams (accelerometer, global positioning system, call and text logs) to create multidimensional digital health footprints for patients following surgery. Yet, with all the technological sophistication and 'big data' mHealth provides, widespread implementation has been elusive. Do clinicians and patients find these data valuable or clinically actionable? How can mHealth become integrated into the day-to-day workflows of surgical systems? Do these data represent opportunities to address disparities of care or worsen them? In this review, we discuss experiences and future opportunities to use mHealth to enhance patient-centered surgical care.
Collapse
|
23
|
Diehl TM, Barrett JR, Abbott DE, Cherney Stafford LM, Hanlon BM, Yang Q, Van Doorn R, Weber SM, Voils CI. Protocol for the MobiMD trial: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a self-monitoring mobile app on hospital readmissions for complex surgical patients. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 113:106658. [PMID: 34954099 PMCID: PMC8844087 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital readmissions are estimated to cost $17.4 billion per year in the Medicare population alone, with readmission rates as high as 30% for patients undergoing complex abdominal surgery. Improved transitional care and self-monitoring may reduce preventable readmissions for such high-risk populations. In this study, we will conduct a single-institution randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effect of a novel transitional care mobile app, MobiMD, on hospital readmission in complex abdominal surgery patients. METHODS Three hundred patients will be randomized 1:1 to standard of care (SOC) versus SOC plus MobiMD app in a parallel, single-blinded, two-arm RCT. Eligible patients are those who undergo complex abdominal surgery in the division of Surgical Oncology, Colorectal Surgery or Transplant Surgery. The MobiMD app provides push notification reminders directly to the patient's smart device, prompting them to enter clinical data and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical data collected via the MobiMD app include vital signs, red flag symptoms, daily wound and surgical drain images, ostomy output, drain output, medication compliance, and wound care compliance. These data are reviewed daily by a physician. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes are 90-day hospital readmission, emergency department and urgent care visits, complication severity, and total readmission cost. DISCUSSION If effective, mobile health apps such as MobiMD could be routinely integrated into surgical transitional care programs to minimize unnecessary hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and healthcare resource utilization. Clinical trials identifier: NCT04540315.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Diehl
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - James R Barrett
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Linda M Cherney Stafford
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Bret M Hanlon
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, WARF Room 201, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Qiuyu Yang
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, WARF Room 201, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Rachel Van Doorn
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Sharon M Weber
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
| | - Corrine I Voils
- University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, 2500 Overlook Terrace (151), Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Characterization of Symptoms after Radical Prostatectomy and Their Relation to Postoperative Complications. J Urol 2022; 207:367-374. [PMID: 34544264 PMCID: PMC9172597 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients will experience symptoms in the initial days after radical prostatectomy (RP), but early patient-reported symptoms have not been well characterized. Our objective was to illustrate the pattern of symptoms experienced after RP and the relation of severe symptoms to postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2016, electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring began at our institution's ambulatory surgery center. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with minimally invasive RP who were sent a daily questionnaire completed using a web interface until postoperative day 10. Severe symptoms automatically generate a "yellow alert," which messages the clinic, while very severe symptoms generate a "red alert," additionally prompting the patient to call. We summarized rates of moderate-to-very severe symptoms and fit local polynomial regressions. We compared rates of 30-day or 90-day complications (grade ≥2) based on the presence of alert symptoms. RESULTS Of 2,266 men undergoing RP, 1,942 (86%) completed surveys. Among moderate-to-very severe symptom levels, pain (72%) and dyspnea (11%) were most common. Pain, nausea and dyspnea consistently decreased over time; fever and vomiting had a flat pattern. In patients experiencing red-alert symptoms, we observed a higher risk of 30-day complications, but rates were low and differences between groups were nonsignificant (2.9% vs 1.9%; difference 1.1%; 95% CI -1.3-3.5; p=0.3). Results were similar examining 90-day complications. CONCLUSIONS While symptoms are common after RP, substantial improvements occur over the first 10 days. Severe or very severe symptoms conferred at most a small absolute increase in complication risk, which should be reassuring to patients and clinicians.
Collapse
|
25
|
Lapen K, Sabol C, Tin AL, Lynch K, Kassa A, Mabli X, Ford J, Cha E, Bernstein MB, Braunstein LZ, Cahlon O, Daly BM, Sandler K, McCloskey SA, Vickers AJ, Khan AJ, Gillespie EF. Development and Pilot Implementation of a Remote Monitoring System for Acute Toxicity Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:979-991. [PMID: 34314814 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to develop and study the implementation of a remote system for toxicity assessment and management of acute side effects of breast radiation using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). METHODS AND MATERIALS A response-adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-based assessment for breast radiation toxicity was administered weekly during and for 8 weeks after radiation from June 2019 to July 2020. The care team received alerts when "severe" symptoms were reported by patients, who were then contacted. Treatment, clinic, and sociodemographic characteristics were abstracted from patient records. A subsample of patients and care team members was qualitatively interviewed at follow-up. RESULTS Overall, 5787 assessments were sent to 678 patients, of whom 489 (72%) completed 2607 assessments (45%). Moderate or greater toxicity was reported by 419 responders (86%; 95% CI, 82%-89%). Clinician alerts for severe toxicity were generated for 264 assessments among 139 unique patients, of which 83% occurred posttreatment. The proportion of surveys that prompted an alert was significantly higher after treatment (219 [13%]) than during treatment (45 [5%]) (P < .001). Survey completion rates in the posttreatment period were higher among patients undergoing partial breast irradiation than postmastectomy radiation (incidence rate ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.81) (P < .001) despite these patients experiencing less severe toxicity. Interviews (15) found that patients had a positive experience with ePROs, although many thought the primary purpose was for research rather than symptom management. CONCLUSIONS With the majority of toxicity occurring after breast radiation has ended, remote symptom monitoring with ePROs appears to fill a gap in clinical practice, particularly for patients undergoing shorter courses of radiation. It is important to properly onboard patients and explain that the purpose of ePROs is to aid clinical care. Further research is needed to determine whether the costs associated with ePROs can be offset by reducing routine clinic visits and whether this approach is acceptable and appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Lapen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Sabol
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy L Tin
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathleen Lynch
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alyse Kassa
- Departments of Health Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xiaolin Mabli
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John Ford
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elaine Cha
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael B Bernstein
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bobby M Daly
- Departments of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kiri Sandler
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Susan A McCloskey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Atif J Khan
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|