Reexamining Time From Breast Cancer Diagnosis to Primary Breast Surgery

Impact of disparity between imaging and pathological tumor size on cancer-specific prognosis among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The association between preoperative imaging and postoperative pathological tumor size disparity, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate this association and identify predictors of size disparity.

METHOD

Patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy for HCC (2000-2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. Size ratio was defined as the ratio of pathological to imaging tumor size. Patients with a size ratio of 0.5-1.5 were classified as "without size disparity," while patients outside this range were considered "with size disparity." Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of CSS, while logistic regression was utilized to determine factors associated with size disparity. For variables identified as significant in multivariable analyses, further evaluation including cutoff determination, were performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Among 833 patients, median size ratio was 1.02, with a strong correlation between imaging and pathological tumor sizes (r = 0.87). Size disparity was present in 106 patients (12.7 %); in general, patients had smaller median imaging sizes (2.85 vs. 4.80 cm; p < 0.001) while size on pathology was noted to be larger(both 4.50 cm; p = 0.370). Patients with size disparity had worse 5-year CSS (60.1% vs. 79.0 %; p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression identified higher ALBI score (HR:2.56 [1.50-4.37]; p < 0.001), larger pathological tumor size (HR:1.09 [1.03-1.15]; p = 0.001), and size disparity (HR:2.53 [1.37-4.66]; p = 0.002) as independent predictors of CSS. Logistic regression demonstrated that cirrhosis (OR: 2.68 [1.43-5.02]; p = 0.002) and log alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (OR:1.11 [1.01-1.22]; p = 0.030) were associated with an increased likelihood of size disparity. Cirrhosis and log AFP could be used to stratify patients relative to probability of a size disparity (low-risk:9.9 %, medium-risk:12.2 %, high-risk:17.7 %). The optimal AFP cutoff value was 3928 ng/mL for non-cirrhotic (AUC:0.90) versus 28.9 ng/mL for cirrhotic (AUC:0.74) patients.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size disparity was associated with worse CSS among patients with HCC undergoing hepatectomy. Size disparity could be predicted preoperatively using cirrhosis status and AFP level, which may help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from more detailed imaging assessments.

Critical timing: Impact of delays to surgery on prognosis in stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Delaying surgery affects the prognosis of patients with lung cancer, but the critical time point at which it becomes detrimental to survival. Identifying this critical time point may benefit patients and guide clinical practice.

METHODS

Data from patients diagnosed with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and to identify time points from diagnosis to surgery that significantly impact prognosis. Kaplan-Meier curves and subgroup analyses were conducted to validate the affect of early versus late surgery on OS. Multinomial logistic regression was utilized to evaluate factors associated with delays in the time from diagnosis to surgery.

RESULTS

We included 55,582 adult patients with stage I-II NSCLC from the SEER database. Time to surgery (TTS) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS in stage I-II NSCLC patients through multivariate Cox regression analysis. Compared to surgeries performed within 6 weeks of TTS, those performed after 6 weeks of TTS (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.20-1.25, P < 0.001) were significantly related to poorer OS. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that age, sex, race, and marital status were risk factors for delayed TTS after diagnosis. Compared to patients with a TTS of 0-40 days, those with a TTS of 63-111 days had the following risks: for patients aged ≥ 75 years, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.32-1.62, P < 0.001); for males, the OR was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.09-1.20, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to stage I-II NSCLC patients who underwent surgery more than 6 weeks after diagnosis, those who underwent surgery within 6 weeks had significantly higher survival rates. Delays in surgery were associated with adverse social factors.

Changes in female cancer diagnostic billing rates over the COVID-19 period in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan

Background

The initial response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Ontario included suspension of cancer screening programs and deferral of diagnostic procedures and many treatments. Although the short-term impact of these measures on female cancers is well documented, few studies have assessed the mid- to long-term impacts.

Objectives

To compare annual billing prevalence and incidence rates of female cancers during the COVID-19 period (2020-2022) to pre-COVID-19 levels (2015-2019).

Design

Retrospective analysis of aggregated claims data for female cancer diagnostic codes from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP).

Methods

Linear regression analysis was used to fit pre-COVID-19 (2015-2019) data for each OHIP billing code and extrapolate counterfactual values for the years of 2020-2022. Excess billing rates were calculated as the difference between projected and actual rates for each year.

Results

In 2020, OHIP billing prevalence rates for cervical, breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers decreased relative to projected values for that year by -50.7/100k, -13.9/100k, -3.5/100k, and -3.8/100k, respectively. The reverse was observed in 2021 with rate increases of 47.8/100k, 59.1/100k, 2.5/100k, and 3.7/100k, respectively. In 2022, the excesses were further amplified, especially for cervical and breast cancers (111.2/100k and 78.67/100k, respectively). The net excess patient billing rate for 2020-2022 was largely positive for all female cancer types (108.3/100k, 123.7/100k, 5.2/100k, and 1.8/100k, respectively). Analysis of billing incidence rates showed similar trends.

Conclusion

The expected female cancer billing rate decreases in 2020 were followed by large increases in 2021 and 2022, resulting in a cumulative excess during the COVID-19 period. Further research is required to assess the nature of these changes.

Prolonged time to breast cancer surgery and the risk of metastasis: an explorative simulation analysis using epidemiological data from Germany and the USA

PURPOSE

Growing breast cancer is associated with an inherent risk of metastasis. If surgical treatment of breast cancer is delayed, the prognosis worsens with increasing tumor size. This justifies the search for a safe time interval between diagnosis and surgery.

METHODS

The 2022 population-based data on incidence and the time interval to initial surgery for the United States (U.S.) and Germany are used. Tumor growth and initiation of metastases can be calculated using public data on hormone receptor status, volume doubling time, and tumor size-dependent relative survival. Our assumptions are based on an initial 19.8 mm mean tumor size. 15-year BC-specific mortality in both countries is assumed to be 19.6% without surgical delay. Volume doubling time stratified by hormone receptor status, assumed to be continuous may differ by a factor of 2.4.

RESULTS

The U.S. and Germany report 287,850/71,375 new breast cancers for the year 2022 and 2019. If tumor removal is delayed by 8 weeks, mortality rate increases by 2.25/4.79% (HR + /HR-) as estimated by our model. The currently reported mean delay in the U.S. and Germany of 33.7/26.0 days or 4.8/3.7 weeks, respectively, would lead to an estimated 4,676/918 additional BC deaths or a 1.6/1.2% rise in the 15-year BC-specific mortality rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers reasonable evidence that confirmed cases of breast cancer should be prioritized and treated according to hormone receptor status and tumor size as soon as possible. Effective screening measures should be followed by timely treatment.

The incentive to treat: Physician agency and the expansion of the 340B drug pricing program

The 340B Drug Pricing Program incentivizes healthcare providers to increase medication use. It does this by allowing certain safety-net hospitals and clinics to purchase outpatient drugs at considerable discounts from manufacturers but be reimbursed at full price by payers. Yet, previous literature has left largely unstudied how the 340B program influences physician prescribing behavior. In this paper, I provide evidence of physician agency among 340B providers in the treatment of breast cancer. I leverage the staggered diffusion of the program to identify the impact of 340B participation on prescribing behavior and patient outcomes. Physicians who join the 340B program increase the share of patients who receive pharmaceutical treatments and increase the intensity of per-patient prescribing. I also find significant increases in prescribing medications that are not included in clinical treatment recommendations and medications to treat side effects. Despite more intensive treatment use, I find no statistically significant change in survival.

Implementing social and behavioral determinants of health data collection: insights from a pragmatic trial

In response to growing evidence and recognition that social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDOH) differentially affect the health-care experiences and outcomes of patients with cancer, there has been an increased focus on optimizing the routine collection of such data. In spring 2024, we launched a pragmatic clinical trial titled "Effect of Early Point-of-Service Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health (SBDOH) Screening and Enhanced Navigation on Care Delivery for Patients With Breast Cancer" (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06019988) at our academic health system. Instruments and modalities were selected following a process of collaborative and iterative consensus building that included an in-person discovery workshop with patients, national experts in psychometrics and SBDOH collection, health system leadership, faculty and staff stakeholders, and study sponsors. The final protocol, which used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, follows a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized format and compares 3 SBDOH screening instruments-Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool, Health Leads Social Screening Tool, and the National Comprehensive Care Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List-and 3 delivery modalities-the Epic electronic health record patient portal; bidirectional text-based conversational agent ("chatbot"), and interactive voice response administered by phone. Despite substantial resources, multidisciplinary collaboration, and advanced planning, we encountered challenges related to patient navigation, stakeholder engagement, and technological integration. We describe our experience as a guide for others aspiring to realize real-world implementation of routine SBDOH data collection.

Disparities in timely surgery among Asian American women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the likelihood of timely surgery for breast cancer patients among diverse Asian subgroups.

METHODS

We analyzed the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2019 and included White and Asian women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer. Patients with multiple cancers, patients who received chemotherapy, and those diagnosed and treated at different hospitals were excluded. The primary outcome was timely surgery within 8 weeks of diagnosis. Race was the primary independent variable. Asian Americans were stratified by geography.

RESULTS

A total of 716,701 women were analyzed, with 3.5% Asians. Delayed surgery was experienced by 13.2% of women. Adjusted analysis indicated no difference in receiving timely surgery between all Asians and Whites. However, Southeast Asians were less likely to undergo timely surgery compared to Whites (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Variations among Asian ethnicities emphasize the need to explore treatment patterns to address disparities in breast cancer care.

Analyzing the interaction between time to surgery and tumor burden score in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The effect of "time to surgery (TTS)" on outcomes for curative-intent hepatectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains debated. The interaction between tumor burden score (TBS) and TTS remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the effects of TBS and TTS on long-term HCC outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with HCC who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy (2000-2022) were analyzed from a multi-institutional database and categorized by TTS (≤60 or >60 days). Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 910 patients, median TTS estimates were 22 days in the short TTS group (n = 485) and 120 days in the long TTS group (n = 425). Patients with long TTS were older and were more likely to have American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2, diabetes mellitus, and cirrhosis. There was no difference in median TBS among patients who had short versus long TTS (4.61 vs 5.00, respectively). In addition, there was no difference in 5-year OS (70.0% vs 63.1%, respectively; P =.05). On multivariate analysis TBS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11; P <.001), log alpha-fetoprotein (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; P =.02), and albumin-bilirubin score (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.66-3.82; P <.001) were associated with OS. In contrast, TTS was not associated with OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.78-1.77; P =.43). Interaction analysis demonstrated that TBS was asssociated with OS among patients with short TTS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.17; P <.001), but not among patients with long TTS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.05; P =.56). Among patients with low TBS (≤5), higher mortality was observed with long TTS versus short TTS (5-year OS: 82.4% vs 63.0%, respectively; P =.001); however, TTS was not associated with OS among patients with high TBS (5-year OS: 57.9% vs 63.3%, respectively; P =.92). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long TTS was a risk factor for OS among patients with low TBS (HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.60-6.01; P <.001), but not among individuals with high TBS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.30-1.07; P =.08). Similar trends were observed relative to cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

TTS needs to be considered in light of patient and tumor-specific factors. Expediting TTS may be particularly important among patients with HCC and a low TBS.

Prognostic significance of diagnosis-to-surgery interval in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide study

BACKGROUND

The question as to whether prolonged diagnosis-to-surgery intervals (DSIs) may compromise survival outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains unanswered. This nationwide study was designed to address this issue.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 26,214 patients with first primary OCSCC identified in the Taiwanese Cancer Registry Database between 2011 and 2021. The optimal DSI cutoff was determined based on 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates using Cox regression analysis. Patients were categorized into three distinct DSI groups: ≤20 days (47 %), 21-31 days (31 %), and > 31 days (22 %).

RESULTS

The 5-year DSS and OS rates for the ≤20/21-31/>31 days groups were 81 %/78 %/77 % and 73 %/70 %/68 %, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Patients in the ≤20 days group had a higher prevalence of pathological stages I-II. After adjustment for potential confounders in multivariable analysis, a DSI > 31 days (versus ≤ 20 days) retained independent associations with adverse outcomes at 5 years, with hazard ratios of 1.07 for both DSS and OS. Propensity score matching and multivariable analysis comparing DSI ≤ 20 days to DSI > 31 days stratified by pathological stage III-IV showed that higher DSS and OS rates were observed in patients with DSI ≤ 20 days than DSI > 31 days (68 %/66 %, p = 0.0586; 60 %/57 %, p = 0.0228, respectively), with hazard ratios of 1.09 for both DSS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that DSI is an independent predictor of 5-year DSS and OS in patients with OCSCC. A DSI exceeding 31 days, or even 21 days, may potentially decrease survival outcomes.

Prioritizing breast cancer surgeries: insights from the KRONOS SCORE

Introduction

In many healthcare systems, the time to surgery (TTS) is used as a quality measure in breast cancer (BC) care. Although guidelines suggest that a waiting period of up to four weeks is acceptable, this is often exceeded, potentially impacting treatment outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to reassess surgical urgency. This study aims to explore the relationship between TTS and clinical outcomes in BC patients, focusing on how TTS influences final tumor stage and lymph node involvement.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 924 women diagnosed with cT1-T3 BC without axillary lymph node involvement between 2014 and 2023. Preoperative staging was done using mammography and ultrasound, while postoperative staging relied on definitive anatomopathological reports. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Wilcoxon tests, and binary logistic regression. A prognostic score, the KRONOS SCORE, was developed based on significant variables from the final model, and internal validation was performed.

Results

Out of 924 patients, 781 had ductal carcinomas, 127 had lobular carcinomas, and 16 had other histologies. Breast-conserving surgery was performed on 664 patients, while 260 underwent mastectomy. TTS was less than 8 weeks for 513 patients and more than 8 weeks for 411 patients. No significant differences in tumor size changes were observed based on TTS. However, lymph node involvement increased from 23.8% in patients operated on within 8 weeks to 26.5% in those operated on after 8 weeks, with significant differences noted in poorly differentiated tumors (G3). The KRONOS SCORE, based on age, tumor grade, and size, was validated, showing a higher risk of lymph node involvement with higher scores.

Discussion

Although TTS did not significantly affect most clinical and pathological parameters, a trend towards increased lymph node involvement with prolonged TTS was observed, particularly in patients with poorly differentiated tumors (G3). The KRONOS SCORE offers a tool for prioritizing surgical patients based on risk factors. However, further multicenter and prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and the KRONOS SCORE model's effectiveness in different clinical settings.

A Multimodal Patient-Centered Teleprehabilitation Approach for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Clinical Perspective

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide, and advances in early detection and treatment have significantly increased survival rates. However, people living beyond breast cancer often suffer from late sequelae, negatively impacting their quality of life. Prehabilitation, focusing on the period prior to surgery, is a unique opportunity to enhance oncology care by preparing patients for the upcoming oncological treatment and rehabilitation. This article provides a clinical perspective on a patient-centered teleprehabilitation program tailored to individuals undergoing primary breast cancer surgery. The proposed multimodal program includes three key components: patient education, stress management, and physical activity promotion. Additionally, motivational interviewing is used to tailor counseling to individual needs. The proposed approach aims to bridge the gap between diagnosis and oncological treatment and provides a holistic preparation for surgery and postoperative rehabilitation in breast cancer patients. The aim of this preparation pertains to improving mental and physical resilience. By integrating current evidence and patient-centered practices, this article highlights the potential for teleprehabilitation to transform clinical care for breast cancer patients, addressing both logistical challenges and holistic well-being.

Time From Screening to Treatment at Accredited Breast Centers in the United States

PURPOSE

The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) launched the Patient-Reported Observations for Medical Procedure Timeliness quality collaborative to assess time intervals between screening and treatment for patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Sites submitted monthly timeliness data in calendar days from 2019 to 2021 along with their perceptions of timeliness at their centers and facility characteristics. All patients were included in the interval from screening to diagnosis, whereas only patients with cancer were included in the biopsy to treatment intervals. Institutions were compared and assessed for differences and associations with center characteristics via the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-three (64.5%) NAPBC-accredited breast centers enrolled, and 311 (83.3%) provided complete timeliness metrics. Two hundred nine (56%) sites did not have trainees, 154 (41.3%) sites were within 10 miles of a major city, and the median number of annual breast cancer cases was 280 (IQR, 189-366). From 2019 to 2021, the time between diagnosis and treatment was as follows: 11-12 days between screening mammogram (MGM) and diagnostic MGM, 8-9 days between diagnostic MGM and biopsy, 32-34 days between biopsy and neoadjuvant therapy, and 39-42 days between biopsy and surgery. The enrolled centers believe that these intervals should be 7, 7, 21, and 28 days, respectively. Higher annual case volume and a larger number of surgeons exclusively devoted to breast disease were significantly associated with longer time intervals.

CONCLUSION

Time from biopsy to first treatment is longer than that centers expected compared with time from screening to diagnosis. There is significant variability across NAPBC in time from screening mammogram to treatment, and some institutions will face more challenges with timely quality measures than others. Further investigation into whether these differences confer outcome differences should be pursued.

Predisposing, Enabling, and Need Factors Driving Palliative Care Use in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Characterizing factors associated with palliative care (PC) use in patients with stage III and VI head and neck cancer using Anderson's behavioral model of health service use.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of the 2004 to 2020 National Cancer Database.gg METHODS: We used multivariate logistic regression to assess the association of predisposing, enabling, and need factors with PC use. We also investigated the association of these factors with interventional PC type (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) and refusal of curative treatment in the last 6 months of life.

RESULTS

Five percent of patients received PC. "Predisposing factors" associated with less PC use include Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 086; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.97) and white and black race (vs white: aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22). "Enabling factors" associated with lower PC include private insurance (vs uninsured: aOR, 064; 95% CI, 0.53-0.77) and high-income (aOR, 078; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85). "Need factors" associated with higher PC use include stage IV (vs stage III cancer: aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.11-2.40) and higher comorbidity index (vs Index 1: aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.42-1.75). High-income (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85) and private insurance (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.53, 0.77) were associated with higher interventional PC use and lower curative treatment refusal (insurance: aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55, 0.67; income aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44, 0.52).

CONCLUSION

Low PC uptake is attributed to patients' race/culture, financial capabilities, and disease severity. Culturally informed counseling, clear guidelines on PC indication, and increasing financial accessibility of PC may increase timely and appropriate use of this service.

Longitudinal Increases in Time to Surgery for Patients with Breast Cancer: A National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Longer time to surgery (TTS) is associated with worse survival in patients with breast cancer. Whether this association has encouraged more prompt care delivery remains unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with clinical stage 0-III breast cancer between 2006 and 2019 for whom surgery was the first mode of treatment. A linear-by-linear test for trend assessed median TTS across the interval. Adjusted linear regression modeling was used to examine TTS trends across patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,435,584 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53-72), 84.3% of patients were White, 91.1% were non-Hispanic, and 99.2% were female. The median TTS in 2006 was 26 days (IQR 16-39) versus 39 days in 2019 (IQR 27-56) [p < 0.001]. In a multivariable linear regression model, TTS increased significantly, with an annual increase of 0.83 days (95% confidence interval 0.82-0.85; p < 0.001). A consistent, significant increase in TTS was observed on subgroup analyses by surgery type, reconstruction, patient race, hospital type, and disease stage. Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and having either Medicaid or being uninsured were significantly associated with prolonged TTS, as were mastectomy and reconstructive surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence that longer TTS is associated with poorer outcomes in patients with breast cancer, TTS has steadily increased, which may be particularly detrimental to marginalized patients. Further studies are needed to ensure the delivery of timely care to all patients.

Examining inequities associated with incarceration among breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer treatment patterns and quality of care among patients experiencing incarceration are underexplored. This study examined associations between incarceration and breast cancer disease and treatment characteristics.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary center in the Southeastern United States that serves as the state's safety-net hospital and primary referral site for the state's prisons. All patients ≥18 years diagnosed with breast cancer between 4/14/2014-12/30/2020 were included. Incarceration status was determined through electronic health record review. Linear regression was used to estimate the association of incarceration with time to treatment. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests to compare groups.

RESULTS

Of the 4329 patients included, 30 (0.7%) were incarcerated at the time of diagnosis or treatment (DI) and 4299 (99.3%) had no incarceration history (NI). Compared to patients who were NI, patients who were DI were younger (p < 0.001), more likely to be unmarried (p < 0.001), and more likely to have family history of breast cancer (p = 0.02). Patients who were DI had an increased time from diagnosis to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (+47.2 days on average, 95% CI 3.9-90.5, p = 0.03) and from diagnosis to surgery (+20 days on average, 95% CI 6.5-33.5, p = 0.02) compared to NI patients. No difference in OS was observed (log-rank p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are incarcerated experienced significant delays in breast cancer care. While no differences in mortality were appreciated, these findings are concerning, as they indicate poorer care coordination for patients who are incarcerated. Further research is necessary to understand the full scope of these disparities and elucidate factors that contribute to them.

Residual cancer burden in two-stage nipple sparing mastectomy after first stage lumpectomy and devascularization of the nipple areolar complex

PURPOSE

Ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) can be ameliorated by 2-stage procedures wherein devascularization of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and lumpectomy with or without nodal staging surgery is performed first (1S), weeks prior to a completion NSM (2S). We report the time interval between procedures in relation to the presence of residual carcinoma at 2S NSM.

METHODS

Women with breast cancer who received 2S NSM from 2015 to 2022 were identified. Both patient level and breast level analyses were conducted. Clinical staging at presentation, pathologic staging at 1S and residual disease at 2S pathology are noted. Residual disease was classified as microscopic (1-2 mm), minimal (3-10 mm), and moderate (> 10 mm).

RESULTS

59 patients (108 breasts) underwent 2S NSM. The median time interval between 1 and 2S for all patients was 34 days: 31 days for upfront surgery invasive cancer, 41 days for upfront DCIS surgery and 31 days for those receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Completion NSM was performed within 6 weeks for 72% of the breasts analyzed. Of the 53 breasts with invasive cancer on 1S pathology, 35% (19/53) had no residual invasive disease and 24.5% (13/53) had neither residual invasive nor in situ carcinoma on final 2S. Among the 50 women who had upfront surgery, 16 (32%) had residual invasive cancer found at 2S NSM, 9 of which had less than or equal to 1 cm disease.

CONCLUSION

Invasive cancers were completely resected during 1S procedure in 65% of breasts. Residual disease was minimal and there was only one case of upstaging at 2S. Added time of two-stage surgery is offset by a reduction in ischemic mastectomy flap complications.

Immigration Status and Breast Cancer Surgery Quality of Care Metrics: A Population-Level Analysis

INTRODUCTION

As immigrant women face challenges accessing health care, we hypothesized that immigration status would be associated with fewer women with breast cancer receiving surgery for curable disease, fewer undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS), and longer wait time to surgery.

METHODS

A population-level retrospective cohort study, including women aged 18-70 years with Stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 in Ontario was conducted. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess odds of undergoing surgery, receiving BCS and wait time to surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 31,755 patients were included [26,253 (82.7%) Canadian-born and 5502 (17.3%) immigrant women]. Immigrant women were younger (mean age 51.6 vs. 56.1 years) and less often presented with Stage I/II disease (87.4% vs. 89.8%) (both p < .001). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference between immigrant women and Canadian-born women in odds of undergoing surgery [Stage I OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.79-1.11), Stage II 1.04 (0.89-1.22), Stage III 1.22 (0.94-1.57)], receiving BCS [Stage I 0.93 (0.82-1.05), Stage II 0.96 (0.86-1.07), Stage III 1.00 (0.83-1.22)], or wait time [Stage I 0.45 (-0.61-1.50), Stage II 0.33 (-0.86-1.52), Stage III 3.03 (-0.05-6.12)]. In exploratory analysis, new immigrants did not have surgery more than established immigrants (12.9% vs. 10.1%), and refugee women had longer wait time compared with economic-class immigrants (39.5 vs. 35.3 days).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed differences in measures of socioeconomic disadvantage and disease characteristics between immigrant and Canadian-born women with breast cancer. Upon adjusting for these factors, no differences emerged in rate of surgery, rate of BCS, and time to surgery. The lack of disparity suggests barriers to accessing basic components of breast cancer care may be mitigated by the universal healthcare system in Canada.

Reducing Disparities: Regional Anesthesia Blocks for Mastectomy with Reconstruction Within Standardized Regional Anesthesia Pathways

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggest disparities in receipt of regional anesthesia prior to breast reconstruction. We aimed to understand factors associated with block receipt for mastectomy with immediate tissue expander (TE) reconstruction in a high-volume ambulatory surgery practice with standardized regional anesthesia pathways.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction from 2017 to 2022 were included. All patients were considered eligible for and were offered preoperative nerve blocks as part of routine anesthesia care. Interpreters were used for non-English speaking patients. Patients who declined a block were compared with those who opted for the procedure.

RESULTS

Of 4213 patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction, 91% accepted and 9% declined a nerve block. On univariate analyses, patients with the lowest rate of block refusal were white, non-Hispanic, English speakers, patients with commercial insurance, and patients undergoing bilateral reconstruction. The rate of block refusal went down from 12 in 2017 to 6% in 2022. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that older age (p = 0.011), Hispanic ethnicity (versus non-Hispanic; p = 0.049), Medicaid status (versus commercial insurance; p < 0.001), unilateral surgery (versus bilateral; p = 0.045), and reconstruction in earlier study years (versus 2022; 2017, p < 0.001; 2018, p < 0.001; 2019, p = 0.001; 2020, p = 0.006) were associated with block refusal.

CONCLUSIONS

An established preoperative regional anesthesia program with blocks offered to all patients undergoing mastectomy with TE reconstruction can result in decreased racial disparities. However, continued differences in age, ethnicity, and insurance status justify future efforts to enhance preoperative educational efforts that address patient hesitancies in these subpopulations.

Breamy: An augmented reality mHealth prototype for surgical decision-making in breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer, affecting approximately one in eight women during their lifetime. Deciding on breast cancer treatment, which includes the choice between surgical options, frequently demands prompt decision-making within an 8-week timeframe. However, many women lack the necessary knowledge and preparation for making informed decisions. Anxiety and unsatisfactory outcomes can result from inadequate decision-making processes, leading to decisional regret and revision surgeries. Shared decision-making and personalized decision aids have shown positive effects on patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes. Here, Breamy, a prototype mobile health application that utilizes augmented reality technology to assist breast cancer patients in making more informed decisions is introduced. Breamy provides 3D visualizations of different surgical procedures, aiming to improve confidence in surgical decision-making, reduce decisional regret, and enhance patient well-being after surgery. To determine the perception of the usefulness of Breamy, data was collected from 166 participants through an online survey. The results suggest that Breamy has the potential to reduce patients' anxiety levels and assist them in decision-making.

Waiting Time for Breast Cancer Treatment in Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the waiting time for initial treatment after breast cancer diagnosis and determine the factors influencing treatment delay in South Korea.

METHODS

This nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment data. The participants were classified according to the regions where their biopsy and treatment were performed (Seoul-Seoul, Metro-Metro, Other-Other, Metro-Seoul, Other-Seoul). Waiting time was analyzed according to regional subgroup, year of diagnosis, and type of treatment. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify the factors associated with treatment delay (after 30 days of diagnosis).

RESULTS

A total of 133,514 participants newly diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2017 were included in the study. The median waiting time for initial treatment in the total population increased from 8 days, in 2010, to 14 days, in 2017. In the Seoul-Seoul group, the waiting time increased from 10 days, in 2010, to 16 days, in 2017. Although the median waiting time was approximately 10 days in the Metro-Metro and Other-Other groups, it was 27 and 24 days, in the Metro-Seoul and Other-Seoul group, respectively, in 2017. The proportion of delayed upfront surgery by more than 30 days was higher in the Metro-Seoul (odds ratio [OR], 8.088; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.357-8.893; p < 0.001) and Other-Seoul (OR, 6.210; 95% CI, 5.717-6.750; p < 0.001) groups than in the Metro-Metro (OR, 1.468; 95% CI, 1.352-1.594; p < 0.001) and Other-Other (reference) groups. Previous medical history and treatment at tertiary hospital were observed as factors related to delayed surgery.

CONCLUSION

Waiting times for breast cancer surgery have increased across all regions of Korea, with those traveling to Seoul experiencing particularly long wait times.

Delays in Initiating Anti-Cancer Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer-How Slow Can We Go?

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. When diagnosed at an early stage, appropriate and timely treatment results in a high cure rate and better quality of life. Delays in initiating anti-cancer therapy, including surgical resection, adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy are commonly encountered, even in developed health care systems. Existing comorbidities that mandate referral to other services, genetic counseling and testing that may dictate the extent and type of anti-cancer therapy and insurance coverage, are among the most commonly cited factors. However, delays can be unavoidable; for over three years, health care systems across the globe were busy dealing with the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. War across hot zones around the globe resulted in millions of refugees; most of them have no access to cancer care, and when/where available, there may be significant delays. Thus, cancer patients across the globe will probably continue to suffer from significant delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Many retrospective reports showed significant negative impacts on different aspects of treatment outcomes and on patients' psychosocial wellbeing and productivity. In this paper, we review the available data on the impact of delays in initiating appropriate treatment on the outcomes of patients with early-stage breast cancer.