Advances in rectal cancer: Real-world evidence suggests limited gains in prognosis for elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer treatment has improved considerably due to the introduction of total meso-rectal excision, radio-chemotherapy, and high-resolution imaging. The aim of this observational cohort study was to quantify the effectiveness of these advances using high-quality data from a representative cohort of patients.

METHODS

20 281 non-metastasized cases retrieved from the Munich Cancer Registry database were divided into three time periods corresponding to before (1988-1997), partial (1998-2007), and full implementation (2008-2019) of clinical advances. Early-onset (<50 yrs.), middle-aged, elderly patient subgroups (> 70 yrs.) were compared. The overall effectiveness of evidence-based guideline adherence was also examined.

RESULTS

Median survival improved by 1.5 yrs. from the first to the last time period. Relative survival increased from 74.9% (5-yr 95%CI[73.3 - 76.6]) to 79.2% (95%CI[77.8 - 80.5]). The incidence of locoregional recurrences was reduced dramatically by more than half (5-yr 17.7% (95%CI[16.5 - 18.8]); 6.7% (95%CI[6.1 - 7.3])). Gains in 5-yr relative survival were limited to early-onset and middle-aged patients with no significant improvement seen in elderly patients (Female 68.6% [63.9 - 73.3] to 67.6% [64.0 - 71.2]; Male 71.7% [65.9 - 77.4] to 74.0% [70.8 - 77.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evidence suggests that recent treatment advances have lead to an increase in prognosis for rectal cancer patients. However, more effort should be made to improve the implementation of new developments in elderly patients. Especially considering, that these cases represent a growing majority of diagnosed patients.

Outcome of breast cancer patients with low hormone receptor positivity: analysis of a 15-year population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Guideline recommendations for the treatment of breast cancer with low hormone receptor (HR) expression (1%-9%) are ambiguous and several studies showed more similarities with HR-negative tumors than with HR strongly positive tumors (≥10%). We used a population-based 15-year cohort to compare patient characteristics and outcome of HR low positive tumors with HR-negative and HR strongly positive tumors, respectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 38  560 women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2018 within the scope of the Munich Cancer Registry with 4.9 million inhabitants were included. Descriptive analyses of prognostic factors, treatment, and outcome analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method; cumulative incidence in consideration of competing risks; and multivariate analyses (Cox regression and Fine-Gray model) were conducted. Endpoints were time to local recurrence (TTLR), time to lymph node recurrence (TTLNR), time to metastasis (TTM), overall survival (OS), and relative survival (RS).

RESULTS

A total of 861 patients (2%) had HR low positive, 4862 (13%) HR-negative, and 32  837 (85%) HR strongly positive tumors. Within the HER2-negative cohort (n = 33  366), survival of HR low positive tumors was significantly worse than that of HR strongly positive tumors [OS hazard ratio 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.78)], whereas between HR low positive and HR-negative tumors no significant survival difference could be detected [OS hazard ratio 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.11)]. TTLR, TTLNR, and TTM showed similar results. By contrast, within the HER2-positive cohort (n = 5194), no statistically significant differences between the three HR groups could be detected in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

Current definitions for HR positivity and its clinical relevance should be reconsidered. Patients with HR low positive/HER2-negative tumors could be regarded and treated similar to patients with triple-negative tumors.

[Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the stomach : What is new?]

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms are classified according to the new WHO classification in (1.) well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G1 (NET G1, Ki67 ≤ 2 or mitosis count <2) and (2.) well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G2 (NET G2, Ki67 3-20 or mitosis count 2-20) and (3.) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas G3 (NEC G3, Ki67 > 20 or mitosis count >20).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study 310 NENs of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University in Munich were reevaluated according to the new WHO classification.

RESULTS

7% of the analyzed NENs were presented as neoplasias of the stomach. In NENs of the stomach three distinct subtypes are recognized: (1) type 1 associated with autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis (2) type 2, associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1) and Zollinger-Ellison Syndrom; and (3) type 3, sporadic tumors.

DISCUSSION

Precursor lesions (i. e. hyperplasia of the ECL cells) are found in patients with hypergastrinaemia (type 1 and 2). This article should provide insights into the diagnosis of NENs of the stomach with emphasis on the new international standard.

[Clinical and epidemiological cancer registration in Germany]

OBJECTIVE

Function and funding of detailed clinical cancer registries (CCRs) is defined by German Social Code Book V (SGB V) and shall be implemented by the end of 2017.

CONTENT

Cancer registration according to regionally defined catchment areas, feedback of results and quality assurance are the basis which determines principles of operation and use of data. Each clinical department delivers only its own findings and therapy, while compilation by the clinical cancer registry describes the patients' way through the regional network of medical care. In this way, oncological centers are not burdened by troublesome documentation of data which originate from other clinics.

CONCLUSION

After successful implementation of CCRs, interested physicians and clinics are able to spend time for analysis and use of meaningful data with the objective of improving quality of care within the region, implementing innovative therapies and presenting their results, and generating new hypotheses to stimulate research.

Abstract P3-07-09: Quantitative p95HER2 protein expression is predictive of trastuzumab response in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Background: Expression of p95HER2 (p95), a truncated form of the HER2 receptor that lacks the trastuzumab binding site but retains kinase activity, has been reported as a prognostic biomarker for poor outcome in trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the ability of p95 to predict trastuzumab benefit has not been demonstrated due to the difficulty in obtaining the appropriate control group, namely HER2+ MBC patients not treated with trastuzumab. In the current study, the predictive value of p95 expression was tested in a cohort comprised of HER2-positive MBC patients treated before the availability of trastuzumab and trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive MBC patients.

Methods: The current cohort was derived from 206 HER2-positive MBC patients in the Munich Cancer Registry with a median follow up of 64 months. Cases were divided between those that received trastuzumab (n=115) and those that were treated before the availability of trastuzumab (n=91). Quantitative p95 protein expression was measured in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using the p95 VeraTag® assay (Monogram Biosciences), which is specific for the active M611 form of p95. Quantitative total HER2 protein expression was measured using the HERmark® assay (Monogram Biosciences). p95 and HERmark cutoffs were pre-specified (Duchnowska, Clin Cancer Res, 20:2805, 2014 and Huang, Am J Clin Pathol, 134:303, 2010). Analyses with p95 were restricted to samples with confirmed HER2 overexpression by HERmark. All hazard ratios (HR) were stratified by estrogen receptor status and grade.

Results: Consistent with previous training (Sperinde, Clin Cancer Res, 16:4226, 2010) and validation (Duchnowska, Clin Cancer Res, 20:2805, 2014) datasets, subjects treated with trastuzumab experienced a shorter time to progression (TTP) when p95 expression levels were above the cutoff versus below the cutoff (HR = 3.8, p = 0.019). However, only a trend was observed between p95 expression levels and overall survival (HR = 2.2, p = 0.20), possibly due to a lower frequency of events and relatively small sample size. The predictive value of p95 was assessed by determining the benefit of adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy treatment in subsets below and above the p95 cutoff. As expected, patients with p95 below the cutoff experienced significant benefit in TTP from adding trastuzumab (HR = 0.13, p&lt;0.001), whereas patients with p95 above the cutoff experienced less benefit (HR = 0.70, p=0.47). p95 expression level was predictive of trastuzumab response with an interaction p-value of 0.015. The results for OS were similar, however trastuzumab benefit was less distinct between the two groups (interaction p = 0.18); HR = 0.23, p = 0.0013 below the p95 cutoff versus HR = 0.50, p = 0.14 above the p95 cutoff.

Conclusions: In this dataset, quantitative p95 expression was predictive of trastuzumab treatment benefit in MBC. Patients with high p95 expression may be particularly good candidates for dual HER2 blockade, as reported in the NeoALTTO trial (Scaltriti, Clin Cancer Res, 21:569, 2015), or other additional therapies.

Citation Format: Sperinde J, Bachmeier B, Weidler JM, Lie Y, Chenna A, Winslow J, Engel J, Schubert-Fritschle G, Sommerhoff C, Petropoulos C, Bates M, Huang W, Nerlich A. Quantitative p95HER2 protein expression is predictive of trastuzumab response in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-09.

Survival in patients with primary liver cancer, gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary tract cancer and pancreatic cancer in Europe 1999-2007: Results of EUROCARE-5

BACKGROUND

The EUROCARE study collects and analyses survival data from population-based cancer registries (CRs) in Europe in order to provide data on between-country differences in survival and time trends in survival.

METHODS

This study analyses data on liver cancer, gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary tract cancers ("biliary tract cancers"), and pancreatic cancer diagnosed in 2000-2007 from 88 CRs in 29 countries. Relative survival (RS) was estimated overall, by region, sex, age and period of diagnosis using the complete approach. Time trends in 5-year RS over 1999-2007 were also analysed using the period approach.

RESULTS

The prognosis of the studied cancers was poor. Age-standardised 5-year RS was 12% for liver cancer, 17% for biliary tract cancers and 7% for pancreatic cancer. There were some between-country differences in survival. In general, RS was low in Eastern Europe and high in Central and Southern Europe. For all sites, 5-year RS was similar in men and women and decreased with advancing age. No substantial changes in survival were reported for pancreatic cancer over the period 1999-2007. On average, there was a crude increase in 5-year RS of 3 percentage points between the periods 1999-2001 and 2005-2007 for liver cancer and biliary tract cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The major changes in imaging techniques over the study period for the diagnosis of the three studied cancers did not result in an improvement in the prognosis of these cancers. In the near future, new innovative treatments might be the best way to improve the prognosis in these cancers.

Quality of life in localised malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

The incidence of melanoma is still increasing in fair-skinned populations. At least 80% of patients have localised disease and expect a 5-year relative survival of >90%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 2003-2004, disease-free patients with localised melanoma were recruited from the Munich Cancer Registry to answer quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires 2 years after treatment.

RESULTS

A response rate of 72% was achieved from a total of 1085 distributed questionnaires. Hundred and seventeen questionnaires had to be excluded because of updated information about secondary tumour and progression events. Thus, questionnaires from 664 patients were evaluated. QoL scores in melanoma patients were essentially similar to those of a general population. Differences were detected between women and men concerning emotional and sexual functioning. Age and number of comorbidities were the strongest factors influencing most all aspects of QoL. Fifty percent of patients referred to deficits in communication with their doctors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who overcome melanoma do not necessarily have a reduced QoL. Strategies used by these melanoma patients resulted in similar levels of coping as previous studies in comparable general populations. Nevertheless, doctor-patient communication was correlated with emotional and social functioning and should be emphasised in treatment and care of melanoma patients.

[Ten years of epidemiological cancer registration in Bavaria]

For a large territorial state like Bavaria only a decentralised cancer registration structure promises successful results: in the form of regional clinical cancer registries and--using the clinical registration as a base--one population-based registry. After ten years of epidemiological cancer registration in Bavaria it can now be shown that the chosen registration concept has proved itself. Currently the completeness of cancer notifications exceeded the international recommended threshold of 90%. A largely complete data stock is available for the years of diagnosis from 2004 to 2005. The task sharing between clinical and population-based cancer registries avoids double registration of data. Both types of registries are supporting physicians and hospitals with a wide palette of services. Together they enable transparency of cancer occurrence as well as transparency of health care for tumour patients.

[Evidence-based medicine in oncology: do the results of trials reflect clinical reality?]

Evidence-based medicine (ebm) is the answer to the postulate to grade the basis of scientific knowledge in medical care and to protect it against proceedings of unjustifiable arbitrariness. The ranking of controlled clinical trials, the evaluation of publications, meta-analyses, and references to "levels of evidence" in medical guidelines are well established. This is not inconsistent with the fact that many diagnostic and therapeutic measures are not evidence-based and that, even in reputable scientific journals, marketing intentions come into conflict with evidence-based facts. The demand for implementing ebm is furthermore an unsustainable ethical pretension as long as ebm itself is not evidence-based. In many cases better results from ebm are not supported by outcome studies. Health services research which, amongst others, evaluates implementation of study results under everyday conditions should be seen as an essential part of ebm. In oncology, cancer registries contribute to this type of transparency. Cancer registries show to what extent ebm is established as an encouraging future programme for the daily cancer health-care delivery and whether ebm exists as a barely realisable parallel world of promising controlled clinical trials.

[Aftercare or not--that is the question!]

There are about 345,000 Germans who have been diagnosed with urological cancer over the last 5 years expecting help from the health services. Even if aftercare is now a substantial part of cancer treatment, its effectiveness has been proven for only a few cancer types. For the subset of urological cancers, evidence for effective diagnostic measures in the framework of aftercare exists only for cancers of the bladder and testis. In this case, the main objective is early detection of local recurrences and providing a curative chance for small cancers. Lack of effectiveness may result from the logic of cancer itself, and is not the consequence of insufficient study designs. Therefore, the main task of aftercare is talking to the patient, to determine individual needs and to recognise treatment consequences. For asymptomatic patients, there is no indication for routine aftercare diagnostics.

Das maligne Melanom der Haut in epidemiologischen Krebsregistern in Deutschland - Inzidenz, klinische Parameter, Variationen in der Erhebung

PURPOSE

To exclude bias of registration evidenced by relevant differences among German cancer registries in the incidence of malignant melanoma (melanocarcinoma).

METHODS

Cancer registries in the Federal German states of Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Bremen, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland, the Munich District and the County of Münster featured registration data of malignant melanoma diagnosed in 2000 A. D. Figures and incidence rates, distribution of T-stage of the primary tumour were analysed as well as the distribution of sources reporting melanoma to the registries. Details of outpatient treatment of cutaneous melanoma by dermatologists in private practice were investigated.

RESULTS

Data of 2,471 malignant melanoma cases were analysed. The highest age standardised incidence rates were 15.7 per 100,000 women and 19 per 100,000 men while the lowest rates were reported as 7.8 and 6.6 per 100,000, respectively (European standard). The proportion of stage T1 tumours varied between 21.5 and 59.2 %. We observed remarkable variations in the structure of reporting sources among the registries. The proportion of reports from dermatologists in private practice varied between 2.2 and 62 %, with higher proportions associated with more T1-T2 tumours but also lower completeness of stage reports. No clear association was identified between incidence of melanoma and reporting sources.

CONCLUSION

Malignant melanomas of smaller size (T1-T2) are reported more frequently in an outpatient setting but very often without data. Hospital departments of dermatology contribute high-quality data with better completeness especially for later stage melanomas. Desirable inclusion of notifications from nationwide operating dermatopathology laboratories is complicated by the Federal German structure of cancer registration. Especially in case of malignant melanoma of the skin notification reports from all sectors of the health care system are imperative for valid epidemiological results.

Moderate progress for ovarian cancer in the last 20 years: prolongation of survival, but no improvement in the cure rate

Although ovarian cancer treatment has advanced in the last 20 years, long-term survival remains stable. The purpose of this study was to determine whether survival has improved in line with treatment advances in a population-based prospective cohort of ovarian cancer patients (1978-1997, with a follow-up through to 2000). The 10-year overall survival rate for cancer patients was similar before and after 1988: 32.2% (n=1661) and 34.4% (n=2089). For patients after 1988, a 12-month prolongation of median survival was observed. In terms of stage according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), only FIGO I and FIGO II patients showed, in addition to a prolongation in survival, an absolute improvement of 12.9 and 12.6% after 5 years and of 13.2 and 8.6% after 10 years. This hardly affected the survival of the total sample. For the most frequent stage FIGO III patients and for FIGO IV patients, a prolongation in survival time, but no improvement in survival rate, was seen after five or 10 years. The progress in FIGO I and II patients may be due to more accurate staging. More effective chemotherapy may also explain some of the improvement. The prolongation in FIGO-stages III-IV may be due to more radical surgery. Patient selection criteria, not only the treatment modalities, may be responsible for the superior results reported in clinical trials. Cancer registries are important for evaluating the quality of healthcare delivery.

Cancer prevention and the contribution of cancer registries

"Because they know what they do" should be the contribution of cancer registration to prevention. The public should be informed about the successes and failures of prevention. In addition, each doctor and each hospital should know the long-term results for its patients despite the complex interdisciplinary health care provision. At the same time, the regional results should be available and contrasted with clinical studies and international standards. An important criterion is also the quality of life of the patients, whose cooperation is more than overdue. According to the possibilities of prevention, six important levels can be differentiated. On each level the outcome should be evaluated on the basis of slightly differing criteria. Primary prevention has the largest incidence-, and thus, mortality-reduction potential, essentially caused by the giving up of smoking. However, the primary prevention of the tumor depends upon what kind of tumor it is, as primary prevention is possible to different extents. Often, secondary prevention is the earliest intervention possible, that is, the early detection of cancer in prognostically favorable stages. However, early detection only offers a chance of cure, albeit a smaller one, for some kinds of tumor. The third prevention level comprises primary care according to the state-of-the-art standards, followed by posttreatment care (disease-free phase) even when the disease is running a fatal course (palliative phase). In the terminal phase, adequate tumor-pain therapy and symptom-oriented measures stand for the sixth prevention level. Even the quality of life of the dying can be optimized. At the beginning of treatment at the latest, the quality of life should also be added to the outcome criteria. In this paper, the individual levels of prevention and possible evaluation criteria for successful prevention, which a modern cancer registration should submit, are discussed and examples given. If the evaluation of the quality of treatment and its significance for health care provision becomes the central tasks of the cancer registers, they will need to be transformed into service centers for hospitals, doctors, and patients.

[Actuarial survival and prognostic factors of bronchial cancer]

A total of 1325 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma who were treated at the surgical clinic of the Technical University of Munich between 1981 and 1991 were enrolled in a prospective follow-up study. The 5-year actuarial survival rate of 605 patients with squamous cell carcinoma was 28.2%, of 288 patients with adenocarcinoma 38.0%, of 219 patients with small cell carcinoma 15.4%, of 74 patients with giant cell carcinoma 19.0%, and of 139 patients with other histologic findings 27.8%. In all, 680 patients (51.4%) underwent surgery. Diagnostic thoracotomy without resection was performed in 6.2% of cases. Lethality within 30 days was 1% for lobectomy, 7.3% for bilobectomy, and 7.7% for pneumonectomy including extended resections. The 5-year survival rates among the operated patients were 64.8% for T1N0M0 tumours, 49.4% for T2N0M0, 46.1% for T1N1M0, 43.4% for T2N1M0, 23.8% for T3 and 11.7% for T4. T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma was associated with a better prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma of the same early stage, with a 5-year survival rate of 82.2% vs 55.9%. The prognosis of patients with T3N2 was worse than that of patients with a T3-4 primary tumour but only N0-1 lymph node involvement (5-year survival rate 18.1% vs 31.7%). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified tumour stage, therapy, and histologic result as the factors with the greatest impact on the prognosis. Adjuvant radiation after resection in patients with T2-3 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma improved the prognosis by one tumour stage compared with patients who only underwent surgery. In conclusion, surgical therapy of bronchogenic carcinoma offers favourable survival rates with acceptable risk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Age-related differences and changes in clinical aspects and follow-up of cervix cancer since 1973]

In an attempt to clarify, whether the malignant potential of cervical cancer is age-dependent and whether this has changed in the last decade, we analysed the data from 1496 patients suffering from cervical cancer. The patients were treated between 1973 and 1988 at the second Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Lindwurmstrasse and at the Frauenklinik Grosshadern, both of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. After 1973, the total number of patients with cervical cancer decreased, whilst at the same time, the percentage of young patients increased. In the sub-group of surgically treated patients (n = 555), the percentage of patients with lymph node metastases increased after 1973. The increase in lymph node involvement was most pronounced in young patients with small tumours (stage Ib disease, 35 years of age). In this group, the percentage of lymph node involvement rose from 6.3% in 1973 to 38.6% in 1988. Lower stage disease was significantly more frequent in the young patients. Accordingly, the overall mean survival time was longer in the young patients. In the sub-group of surgically treated patients, however, when comparing equal stages, the survival time was shorter in the young patients. In small tumours (confined to the uterine cervix), pelvic lymph node involvement was more frequently seen in the younger patients. Secondary metastases developed more rapidly and significantly more often in the young patients. Our data supply evidence to indicate an enhanced malignancy of cervical cancer in young patients.

[Postoperative adjuvant whole abdomen irradiation in ovarian cancer]

Seventy-nine patients with ovarian carcinoma stage I-III postoperatively received a whole abdominal irradiation (median dose: 22.5 Gy) followed by pelvic boost irradiation (median pelvic dose: 45 Gy) as the sole adjuvant therapy. Surgery preceding the irradiation was radical only in 59 percent of the patients. Whole abdominal irradiation was performed either in the moving-strip-technique or the open-field-technique. The median follow-up time was 57 months. The overall and the progression-free five-year survival rate of the whole group is 66 +/- 6% and 63 +/- 6%, respectively. We have not seen a clear-cut dependence of the survival rates on the completeness of the surgery, on tumor histology or grading. In a statistically significant way, the survival rates depend on the stage, the presence of tumor rests, and, above all, on the risk group. The overall five-year survival rate for the intermediate-risk patients is 78 +/- 7% and 22 +/- 11% for high risk patients. There aren't any randomized studies concerning the optimal adjuvant therapy for intermediate-risk patients. Because of the reproduceable results and the infrequent toxicity, whole abdominal irradiation seems to be a treatment equivalent to other adjuvant therapies for these patients.

[Late metastasis in malignant melanoma of the skin]

Among a total of 680 patients with advanced malignant melanoma, the interval between removal of the primary tumour and first manifestation of tumour progression was more than five years in 47 (6.9%: 28 women and 19 men, mean age 45 [range 27-70] years), more than 10 years in ten of them. In only eight was the thickness of the primary tumour more than 3 mm. A total of 29 patients died after the tumour progression. Survival time ranged from 1 to 120 months, mean 18 +/- 23 months. There was no correlation between manifestation-free interval and survival time after the first progression had occurred. It is concluded from these findings that patients with malignant melanoma should be followed up for at least ten years.