Use of ultrasonography in the detection of ureteric reflux in children suspected of having urinary infection

Normative values for ureteral diameter in children

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the ureter is a fundamental part of the radiologic evaluation of the urinary tract. Abnormal ureteral dilation warrants further investigation to assess the etiology, which includes obstruction and/or reflux. Despite this fundamental need, there are no established normative values in children based on imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To provide normative values for ureteral diameter in pediatric patients with age-related ranges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all magnetic resonance (MR) urography studies and chose only normal ureters for assessment. The images were analyzed on commercially available software to assess maximum internal diameter. Manual measurements were done in cases where the images were below the resolution for automated assessment. Maximum intraluminal ureteral diameters were measured in upper, mid and lower thirds and the average of the three maximum ureteral diameters was used to obtain the average widest internal ureteral diameter. Multivariable linear regression was performed to test the association between the calculated diameter and gender. Differences in sizes between the left and right ureter were assessed using paired Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one MR urography studies were selected, which included 160 ureter units. The diameter increases progressively with age, ranging from 3.2 mm during infancy to 5.0 mm in patients older than 16 years of age. After 9 years of age, the average widest internal ureteral diameter is slightly larger in males compared to females (odds ratio [OR]=1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.63, 2.25], P<0.0001). The right ureter was slightly larger than the left (3.9 mm vs. 3.7 mm, P=0.004) among 39 patients in whom both right and left ureter units were included. The average mid ureteral diameter is widest, followed by the distal third then proximal third.

CONCLUSION

We present the normative values for the average widest internal ureteral diameter based on laterality and different segments. In the pediatric population, 3.8 mm should be considered the average widest internal ureteral diameter.

Dimercaptosuccinic acid scan or ultrasound in screening for vesicoureteral reflux among children with urinary tract infections

BACKGROUND

There is considerable interest in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) because its presence, especially when severe, has been linked to an increased risk of urinary tract infections and renal scarring. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), also known as micturating cystourethrography, is the gold standard for the diagnosis of VUR, and the grading of its severity. Because VCUG requires bladder catheterisation and exposes children to radiation, there has been a growing interest in other screening strategies that could identify at-risk children without the risks and discomfort associated with VCUG.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to evaluate the accuracy of two alternative imaging tests - the dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan (DMSA) and renal-bladder ultrasound (RBUS) - in diagnosing VUR and high-grade VUR (Grade III-V VUR).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies from 1985 to 31 March 2016. The reference lists of relevant review articles were searched to identify additional studies not found through the electronic search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered published cross-sectional or cohort studies that compared the results of the index tests (DMSA scan or RBUS) with the results of radiographic VCUG in children less than 19 years of age with a culture-confirmed urinary tract infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently applied the selection criteria to all citations and independently abstracted data. We used the bivariate model to calculate summary sensitivity and specificity values.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. Twenty studies reported data on the test performance of RBUS in detecting VUR; the summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.44 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.54) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.86), respectively. A total of 11 studies reported data on the test performance of RBUS in detecting high-grade VUR; the summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.59 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.72) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.87), respectively. A total of 19 studies reported data on the test performance of DMSA in detecting VUR; the summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.75 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.81) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57), respectively. A total of 10 studies reported data on the accuracy of DMSA in detecting high-grade VUR. The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.93 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.98) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.56), respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Neither the renal ultrasound nor the DMSA scan is accurate enough to detect VUR (of all grades). Although a child with a negative DMSA test has an < 1% probability of having high-grade VUR, performing a screening DMSA will result in a large number of children falsely labelled as being at risk for high-grade VUR. Accordingly, the usefulness of the DMSA as a screening test for high-grade VUR should be questioned.

Non-invasive vesicoureteral reflux imaging

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate non-invasive and non-ionizing methods of determining the presence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and to preview upcoming ideas that have the potential of finding VUR non-invasively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the terms 'vesicoureteral reflux/radiography', 'vesicoureteral reflux/ultrasonography' and 'magnetic resonance imaging/urologic disease'. We also included information from a recent American Academy of Pediatrics meeting and our own research.

RESULTS

Voiding ultrasonography is non-radiating and has undergone significant improvements recently. Best results require instillation of contrast through invasive catheter placement, and doubts regarding sensitivity and specificity are significant. Magnetic resonance cystograms are best with catheter-instilled contrast. They are expensive, require anesthesia or sedation, and are impractical. Horizon technologies include magnetic resonance cystogram with gadolinium 'activation' within the bladder. Another promising completely non-invasive method includes warming the bladder with microwaves and measuring kidney temperatures before and after warming. Detection of a rise in kidney temperatures would indicate VUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Voiding cystourethrography remains the gold standard in reflux diagnosis but is invasive and submits the child to ionizing radiation. Developing technologies need improvements and further research before they may have a role in significantly decreasing voiding cystourethrography use or replacing it completely.

Catheter-free methods for vesicoureteric reflux detection: our experience and a critical appraisal of existing data

In recent years, the exact role of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) in general has become controversial, though in some groups of children the knowledge of the existence or non-existence of VUR is still a very important issue. The number of techniques available for the assessment of VUR is increasing, and a new classification taking into account their real characteristics (direct/indirect, catheter-using/catheter-free, radiation-giving/radiation-free) has been proposed. The purpose of the following review is to evaluate the currently available evidence supporting the use of various catheter-free methods for VUR detection. We believe that as the clinical role of VUR has been questioned, it is even more important for the method of its detection to be user-friendly as regards catheterisation, radiation and availability. There is still no evidence supporting the assertion that any of the catheter-free methods of VUR detection might be the optimal one for any child. However, there are some groups of children who would benefit from using them. New studies using new, catheter-free methods of VUR detection or a combination of two or more of the methods described may prove useful in improving sensitivity and providing additional data on this important issue.

The efficacy of ultrasound and dimercaptosuccinic acid scan in predicting vesicoureteral reflux in children below the age of 2 years with their first febrile urinary tract infection

We evaluated the efficacy of dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan and ultrasound (US) in comparison with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in predicting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children below the age of 2 years. Medical records and radiologic studies of children (<2 years) suffering their first febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) between January 2001 and May 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of US and DMSA scans in diagnosing VUR. Among 220 children with their first febrile UTI, VUR was detected in 67 (30.4%). The detection rate of VUR by US was 41.7% and 86% in the low (I, II) and high grade (III~IV) groups, respectively. Detection rate of VUR by DMSA scan was 37.5% and 88.4% in the low and high grade groups, respectively. Combining US and DMSA scan, we found that the detection rate of high grade VUR was 95.3% and that of low grade was 62.5%. During follow up, most of the low grade VURs with normal DMSA and US scans resolved or were downgraded. Most high grade VURs could be detected by US and DMSA scan, but the prediction rate was not as high in low grade VURs. However, we can anticipate spontaneous improvement without complications in patients with either low or high grade reflux and negative findings on US and DMSA scan.

Screening young children with a first febrile urinary tract infection for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux with renal ultrasound scanning and technetium-99m-labeled dimercaptosuccinic acid scanning

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive value of renal ultrasound scanning and 99m-Technetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in young children with a first urinary tract infection (UTI).

STUDY DESIGN

The medical records of children who had been examined with renal ultrasound scanning, DMSA scanning, and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) were reviewed. The findings of renal ultrasound scanning, DMSA scanning, and their predictive values were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 699 children, high-grade VUR (grades III-V) was diagnosed in 119 (17.0%). Signs of renal hypodysplasia (OR, 16.15), cyclic dilatation of pelvicaliceal system (OR, 11.73), hydroureter (OR, 4.00) with renal ultrasound scanning, and renal hypodysplasia (OR, 8.78), acute pyelonephritis (OR, 2.76) with DMSA scanning were associated with high-grade VUR. The sensitivities for high-grade VUR of ultrasound scanning alone (67.2%) or DMSA scanning alone (65.5%) were not as good as that of a both-test strategy, which had a sensitivity rate of 83.2%. The negative predictive value of the both-test strategy was 91.5%.

CONCLUSION

Renal ultrasound scanning and DMSA scanning both should be routinely performed in children with a first febrile UTI. VCUG is only indicated when abnormalities are apparent on either ultrasound scanning or DMSA scanning or both.

Current status of vesicoureteral reflux diagnosis

In children, diagnostic imaging for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) encompasses both radiologic and sonographic modalities. The former comprises voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), the most widespread method for examination for reflux, and radionuclide cystography (RNC). In RNC the radiation exposure is significantly less than in VCUG with continuous fluoroscopy, but the anatomic details depicted are much inferior. With the introduction of pulsed fluoroscopy, the radiation exposure of VCUG has been markedly curtailed. VCUG is the first imaging choice for the urethra. The sonographic diagnosis of VUR with the intravesical administration of an ultrasound (US) contrast agent-voiding urosonography (VUS)-is being used increasingly in the routine diagnostic imaging work-up of reflux. Various sonographic reflux examination methods had been tried in the past. The real breakthrough came with the availability of stabilized US contrast media. Further impetus came with the introduction of harmonic US imaging. The recent release of a second generation US contrast medium promises to make a further positive impact on VUS. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced VUS has been found to be comparable to radiologic methods. VUS is primarily performed in follow-up studies and as the primary reflux examination modality in girls.

Conventional imaging in paediatric uroradiology

OBJECTIVE

To briefly describe basic conventional imaging in paediatric uroradiology.

METHOD

The state of the art performance of standard imaging techniques (intravenous urography (IVU), voiding cystourethrography (VCU), and ultrasound (US)) is described, with emphasis on technical aspects, indications, and patient preparation such as adequate hydration. Only basic applications as used in routine clinical work are included.

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

Conventional imaging methods are irreplaceable. They cover the majority of daily clinical routine queries, with consecutive indication of more sophisticated modalities in those patients who need additional imaging for establishing the final diagnosis or outlining therapeutic options.

Work-up of urinary tract infection in infants and children

Urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants and children demands rapid differentiation between upper UTI (pyelonephritis) and lower UTI (cystitis) for prompt treatment to be initiated so that renal damage is minimized. This pictorial review presents a wide gamut of structural and functional abnormalities of the urinary tract that may predispose infants and children to UTI, including vesicoureteral reflux, upper urinary tract obstruction (ureteropelvic junction obstruction), lower urinary tract obstruction (primary megaureter, ureterovesical junction obstruction, posterior urethral valve, ectopic ureterocele with or without associated duplex collecting system), neurogenic problems (dysfunctional voiding), calculi, and parenchymal scars. Sonography (ultrasound [US]) is the imaging modality of choice for assessment of renal size, growth (serial sonograms), texture, and blood flow. Other modalities used to work-up UTI in the pediatric patient include fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrogram, nuclear voiding cystourethrogram, and nuclear renal scintigraphy (NRS). Excretory urography is no longer recommended in the routine evaluation of childhood UTI because information regarding anatomy and function (qualitative and quantitative) can be better assessed with US and NRS, respectively. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are primarily reserved for complex cases in which a definitive diagnosis cannot be made with routine imaging. Algorithms for work-up of UTI in various pediatric age groups are presented.