Assessment of serum CYFRA 21-1 in lung cancer

A new strategy to design label-free electrochemical biosensor for ultrasensitive diagnosis of CYFRA 21-1 as a biomarker for detection of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most dangerous cancers with high mortality rate among other cancers therefore, early detection of this cancer is very important. Many studies have been reported in ways of diagnostic lung cancer early. According to reports, one of the most important biomarkers to detect lung cancer is Cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 (CYFRA21-1), which is significantly related to non-small cell lung cancer, in particular, squamous cell carcinoma. Thus, finding a new method for the early diagnosis of CYFRA 21-1 (DNA target probe) is essential. In the present report, we design a novel label-free electrochemical DNA-biosensor related to the signal of guanine oxidation. The proposed DNA biosensor is fabricated by a modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with reduced-graphene oxide (rGO), poly pyrrole (PPy), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and single-strand DNA (ssDNA as capture probe) GCE/rGO/PPy/AgNPs/ssDNA. The differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) techniques are used to verify the hybridization process between capture and target probes. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), energy diffraction X-ray (EDX) and field-emission scanning microscopy (FE-SEM) techniques are applied to the characterization of different modified GCE surfaces as well as X-ray diffraction (XRD) for graphene oxide synthesis. The XRD pattern of the synthesized GO that its diffraction peak appears at 10.2. The applied CV and DPV for the guanine oxidation are determined under optimal conditions. The label-free DNA biosensor showed a great result for the determination of CYFRA21-1 with a wide linear range from two consecutive linear relationships of peak current and CYFRA21-1 concentration were found (1.0 × 10^-14 - 1.0 × 10^-10 M, R² = 0.9936 and 1.0 × 10^-9 - 1.0 × 10^-6 M, R² = 0.9955). Proposed electrochemical biosensor displayed low detection limit (2.4 fM).

Biomarkers and Genetic Markers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma-What Do We Already Know

Simple Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma continue to remain a serious threat. In this review, we describe the most common biomarkers and genetic markers currently used in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. It can be observed that biomarkers and genetic markers might be applied in various parts of diagnosis including screening tests in a high-risk group, non-invasive detection, control of therapy, treatment selection, and control of recurrence. Also, it can be seen that nowadays there is a need for more specific markers that would improve the detection in early or very early stages of both types of cancers and further research should be focused on it.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with an increasing worldwide mortality rate. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. In both types of cancers, early detection is very important. Biomarkers are a relevant part of diagnosis, enabling non-invasive detection and control of cancer recurrence, as well as in the application of screening tests in high-risk groups. Furthermore, some of these biomarkers are useful in controlling therapy and treatment selection. Detection of some markers presents higher sensitivity and specificity in combination with other markers when compared with a single detection. Some gene aberrations are also prognostic markers in the two types of cancers. In the following review, we discuss the most common biomarkers and genetic markers currently being used in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Current and Future Development in Lung Cancer Diagnosis

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in North America and other developed countries. One of the reasons lung cancer is at the top of the list is that it is often not diagnosed until the cancer is at an advanced stage. Thus, the earliest diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial, especially in screening high-risk populations, such as smokers, exposure to fumes, oil fields, toxic occupational places, etc. Based on the current knowledge, it looks that there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers. The current diagnosis of lung cancer includes different types of imaging complemented with pathological assessment of biopsies, but these techniques can still not detect early lung cancer developments. In this review, we described the advantages and disadvantages of current methods used in diagnosing lung cancer, and we provide an analysis of the potential use of body fluids as carriers of biomarkers as predictors of cancer development and progression.

The diagnostic value of CEA for lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion in China: a meta-analysis

Objective: To accurately evaluate the diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for malignant pleural effusion associated with lung cancer in the Chinese population.Methods: Three English databases, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, and two Chinese databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data, up to 5 November 2020, were searched. The literature on the diagnosis of lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion by CEA in the Chinese population were collected. The data was analyzed by Stata15.0 software.Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95), 10.46 (95% CI: 7.29-15.00), 0.22 (95% CI: 0.17-0.28), 47.26 (95% CI: 28.84-77.44), respectively . The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95). No significant publication bias was found (P > 0.05)Conclusion: CEA has anexcellent diagnostic value for patients with lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion in the Chinese population.

Detection of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath to screen lung cancer: a systematic review

To evaluate the clinical value of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath for lung cancer (LC) screening, a systematic review was performed. Systematic search for studies about exhaled VOCs for LC screening was conducted according to PRISMA. Thirty eight studies with 4873 participants met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Generally speaking, the results suggest that exhaled VOCs have potential to screen LC and more studies are needed in the future.

Chronic nasal exposure to nanoparticulate TiO2 causes pulmonary tumorigenesis in male mice

Chronic inhalation bioassays in rodents are used to assess pulmonary carcinogenicity for purposes of hazard identification and potentially for risk characterization. Numerous studies have been confirmed that exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂ NPs) may result in chronic pulmonary inflammation in both mice and rats. However, very few studies have focused on the pulmonary tumorigenesis. In this study, to examine whether chronic TiO₂ NP exposure induce tumorigenesis in the lung, forty mice (each group) were nasally exposed to 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg body weight TiO₂ NPs for nine consecutive months, lung pathology was then evaluated, and the biochemical function parameters in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and tumor markers in the serum were investigated using an ELISA method. We observed that nasal exposure to TiO₂ NPs caused infiltration of inflammatory cells, tumorigenesis in the lung, and accompanied by significant increases of lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and total protein levels in BLAF, significant increases in tumor markers including cytokeratin 19, neuron-specific enolase, carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and cancer antigen-125 in the serum. It implies that chronic inhaled TiO₂ NPs may increase possibility of pulmonary tumor formation for human. Therefore, the production and application of TiO₂ NPs should be paid more attention. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 32: 1651-1657, 2017.

Clinical evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis of serum tumor markers in lung cancer

The detection of serum tumor markers is valuable for the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Tumor markers are frequently used for the management of cancer patients. However, single markers are less efficient but marker combinations increase the cost, which is troublesome for clinics. To find an optimal serum marker combination panel that benefits the patients and the medical management system as well, four routine lung cancer serum markers (SCCA, NSE, CEA, and CYFRA21-1) were evaluated individually and in combination. Meanwhile, the costs and effects of these markers in clinical practice in China were assessed by cost-effectiveness analysis. As expected, combinations of these tumor markers improved their sensitivity for lung cancer and different combination panels had their own usefulness. NSE + CEA + CYFRA21-1 was the optimal combination panel with highest Youden's index (0.64), higher sensitivity (75.76%), and specificity (88.57%), which can aid the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer. Nevertheless, the most cost-effective combination was SCCA + CEA, which can be used to screen the high-risk group.

Combining multiple serum biomarkers in tumor diagnosis: A clinical assessment

The present study aimed to assess the diagnostic/prognostic value of various clinical tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA21-1), α-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen-125 (CA-125), carbohydrate antigen-19.9 (CA-19.9) and ferritin, individually or in combination. The electro-chemiluminescence immunization method was performed to detect the levels of seven tumor markers in 560 cancer patients and 103 healthy subjects for comparison. The serum levels of the seven markers measured in cancer patients were higher compared to healthy subjects (P<0.05 for AFP and P<0.001 for the remaining six markers). Different markers had different sensitivity towards different types of tumors. Combining more markers significantly increased the ratios of positive diagnosis in the tumors. The diagnostic sensitivities of combining seven markers were particularly high in digestive, urinary and skeletal tumors (82, 92 and 83%, respectively). Gynecological tumors have exhibited a constant yet relatively low positive diagnosis irrespective of the use of a single marker or combined markers. However, the increase in sensitivity when combining markers was accompanied by a decrease in specificity. Generally, combining more markers increased the tumor detection rates, while a combination of the seven markers provided the highest detection rate. Combined detection showed a particularly high sensitivity in detecting respiratory, digestive and urinary system tumors, with the lowest sensitivity observed in gynecological tumors. As a result, combining tumor markers may play an important role in early tumor detection/diagnosis while the loss of specificity can be tolerated.

CEA, CYFRA 21-1, NSE, and ProGRP in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a multivariate approach / CEA, CYFRA 21-1, NSE und ProGRP in der Diagnostik des Lungenkarzinoms: eine multivariate Analyse

We retrospectively studied the single and combined diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), neuron specific enolase (NSE) and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), which were routinely analysed in patients with lung tumours of unknown origin at the time of admission to hospital. Inclusion criteria were the determination of CEA (AxSYM/Abbott), CYFRA 21-1 (ElecSys/Roche) and NSE (Kryptor/Brahms). We examined 1747 patients, where 1325 suffered from lung cancer (LC; small cell lung cancer, SCLC: n=194; non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC: n=1015; others: n=116), 318 from benign lung diseases and 104 from lung metastases due to another primary malignancy. As ProGRP (ELISA ALSI/IBL) became available only recently, there are less data points of this marker. In total, 99.8% of LC patients released at least one of the four biomarkers (defined as values exceeding the median of healthy controls), and for the discrimination between benign disease (BD) and malignant lung disease each marker reached 100% tumour specificity at high levels (CEA: 20 ng/mL; CYFRA 21–1: 40 ng/mL; NSE: 45 ng/mL; ProGRP: 250 pg/mL). At a specificity of >99%, ProGRP reached the highest diagnostic efficacy for SCLC with 57% true positive results, CEA had the highest capacity (17%) to detect malignant lung tumours in general and adenocarcinomas of the lung with 29%. CYFRA 21-1 was dominant for squamous cell carcinomas (12%). Combining the four markers leads with the prerequisite of high specificity (>99%) to 50% true positives for malignant lung tumours, 44% for NSCLC, 36% for squamous cell carcinomas, 53% for adenocarcinomas, and 78% for SCLC, respectively. In cases of lung tumours of unknown origin, the combined use of CEA, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and ProGRP is useful for the differentiation between benign and primary or secondary malignant disease and suggests the assignment to histological subtypes.

Predicting Risk of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is the most common, dose-limiting complication of thoracic radio- and radiochemotherapy. Unfortunately, predicting which patients will suffer from this complication is extremely difficult. Ideally, individual phenotype- and genotype-based risk profiles should be able to identify patients who are resistant to RILI and who could benefit from dose escalation in chemoradiotherapy. This could result in better local control and overall survival. We review the risk predictors that are currently in clinical use--dosimetric parameters of radiotherapy such as normal tissue complication probability, mean lung dose, V20 and V30--as well as biomarkers that might individualize risk profiles. These biomarkers comprise a variety of proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokines and molecules including transforming growth factor beta1 that are implicated in development and persistence of RILI. Dosimetric parameters of radiotherapy show a low negative predictive value of 60% to 80%. Depending on the studied molecule, negative predictive value of biomarkers is approximately 50%. The predictive power of biomarkers might be increased if they are coupled with radiogenomics, e.g., genotyping analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in transforming growth factor beta1, transforming growth factor beta1 pathway genes, and other cytokines. Genetic variability and the complexity of RILI and its underlying molecular mechanisms make identification of biological risk predictors challenging. Further investigations are needed to develop more effective risk predictors of RILI.

Clinical value of CYFRA21-1, NSE, CA15-3, CA19-9 and CA125 assay in the elderly patients with pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic value of five tumour markers in the elderly patients with pleural effusions. Serum and pleural fluid levels of cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) were assayed in 32 elderly patients with malignant pleural effusions resulting from advanced lung cancer and in 30 elderly patients with benign pleural effusions by ELISA. Serum levels of CYFRA21-1, NSE, CA15-3, CA19-9 and CA125 in patients with malignant pleural effusions were 12.84 +/- 6.48 microg/l, 22.07 +/- 11.25 microg/l, 65.74 +/- 30.26 kU/l, 56.32 +/- 25.6 kU/l and 71.86 +/- 31.45 kU/l, respectively, and were significantly higher than those in patients with benign pleural effusions (p < 0.01). Pleural fluid levels of CYFRA21-1, CA15-3, CA19-9 and CA125 except NSE in patients with malignant pleural effusions were 18.64 +/- 8.15 microg/l, 59.31 +/- 27.35 kU/l, 48.24 +/- 21.56 kU/l and 62.16 +/- 27.79 kU/l, respectively, and were significantly higher than those in patients with benign pleural effusions (p < 0.01). The parallel combined testing of five tumour markers in serum increased the diagnostic sensitivity to 90.6%, and serial combined testing increased the diagnostic specificity to 93.3%. The sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of these tumour markers in pleural fluid were as follows: CYFRA21-1, 84.4/90; CA15-3, 62.5/73.3; CA19-9, 37.5/66.7; CA125, 56.3/70; for differentiating malignant effusions from benign effusions. When CYFRA21-1 and CA15-3 combined, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100% and 90% respectively). Serum and pleural fluid levels of the five tumour markers shows certain values in the diagnosis and differentiate diagnosis for malignant pleural effusions in the elderly patients from benign. The combined assay of five tumour markers in serum and the CYFRA21-1 combined with CA15-3 in pleural fluid were helpful and can increase the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing malignant pleural effusions.

Tumor markers in detection of lung cancer

The expression of biomarkers by lung cancers is useful in the diagnosis and clinical management of patients with lung cancer. Biomarkers provide insight into histogenesis, interrelationships, and biological behavior of lung tumors. This chapter presents data on lung cancer detection, involving some of the most studied and interesting lung cancer biomarkers to date-CYFRA 21-1, NSE, ProGRP, SCC, CEA, Tumor M2-PK, as well as markers in clinical application such as CRP, LDH, tumor-suppressor genes and oncogenes, CA125, CgA, NCAM, and TPA. Biomarker profiles in combination with fuzzy logic techniques have also been addressed. Serum markers used alone or in combination with other indices might play an important role in monitoring response to therapy in early detection of tumor reactivation in new treatment strategies as well as in secondary prevention.

Elevation of cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) in serum of patients with radiation pneumonitis: possible marker of epithelial cell damage

Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) level in serum have already been documented as a useful tumor marker for lung cancer. In the present study, we hypothesized that CYFRA 21-1 increases in the sera of patients with radiation pneumonitis, resulting from epithelial cell damage. We measured CYFRA 21-1 in the sera of patients with radiation pneumonitis and evaluated the correlation between CYFRA 21-1 level and severity of radiation pneumonitis as well as clinical course. We studied 16 patients diagnosed with radiation pneumonitis associated with primary lung cancer. CYFRA 21-1 levels in the sera of patients with diffuse radiation pneumonitis (n = 6) significantly increased compared to normal smokers (n = 10) or patients with local radiation pneumonitis (n = 10). CYFRA 21-1 values in sera changed according to the progression or improvement of the diffuse radiation pneumonitis. An immunohistochemical study using pulmonary tissues obtained from autopsied patients with radiation pneumonitis demonstrated that the hyaline membrane and proliferating type II pneumocytes were strongly stained by the anti-human cytokeratin 19 antibody. Our data demonstrated that CYFRA 21-1 was increased in patients with diffuse radiation pneumonitis. Since CYFRA 21-1 is widely used as a tumor marker for lung cancer, this evidence should be noted especially in irradiated patients.

Cytokeratin 19 fragment in patients with nonmalignant respiratory diseases

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA) is a specific tumor marker in patients with lung cancer; however, it has been reported that serum CYFRA levels are elevated in some patients with nonmalignant respiratory diseases such as interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and collagen disease-associated pulmonary fibrosis (CDPF). To investigate the serum CYFRA levels in nonmalignant respiratory diseases in detail, we studied 413 patients with respiratory diseases.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Four hundred thirteen patients with nonmalignant respiratory diseases and lung cancer.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Serum CYFRA levels were measured with a commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit. Immunohistochemical study was performed using monoclonal antibody Ks 19.1 (Rosch Diagnosica; Bern, Switzerland) on surgically resected or autopsied lung specimens. Gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting was performed with serum samples. In 149 patients with nonmalignant diseases except IPF and CDPF, the ratio of patients with > 3.5 ng/mL of serum CYFRA was 13.4%. In 13 of 30 patients (43.3%) with IPF and CDPF, the serum CYFRA levels were abnormally elevated. The 95th percentile serum CYFRA level of the patients with nonmalignant respiratory diseases was 6.2 ng/mL, and none of them had CYFRA levels > 20.3 ng/mL. Survival in patients with IPF and CDPF with elevated serum CYFRA levels were significantly lower than in those with normal range (p = 0.0335). Western blotting using serum from nonmalignant lung diseases and patients with lung cancer showed no apparent difference between them. An immunohistochemical study indicated CYFRA was selectively expressed in the pulmonary epithelial cells that covered the remodeling alveolar septi in nonmalignant respiratory disease.

CONCLUSION

Serum CYFRA was elevated in some nonmalignant respiratory diseases, especially in IPF and CDPF. The value of serum CYFRA would reflect the severity of lung injury in nonmalignant respiratory diseases and might be related to the prognosis in patients with IPF and CDPF.

Application of differential display to identify genes for lung cancer detection in peripheral blood

A blood assay for detection of lung cancer biomarkers could significantly improve cancer patient prognosis and survival rates. Amplified fragment length polymorphism-differential display (AFLP-DD) was used to identify gene transcripts found in lung cancer tissue and the peripheral blood of lung cancer patients. The clones were evaluated for gene expression in lung cancer tissue, peripheral blood of lung cancer patients and healthy volunteers' blood. The isolated gene transcript clones were found to be from the syndecan 1 gene, collagen 1 gene and 2 novel genes. All 4 transcripts were expressed in normal lung tissue, 4 cultured primary lung cells and 6 lung cancer cell lines. RNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples of 69 lung cancer patients. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to test for the presence of cytokeratin 19 and the 4 gene mRNA transcripts in blood RNA. The positive detection rate of at least 1 of the 5 transcripts was 79% for lung adenocarcinoma and 62% for squamous carcinoma. Using RT-PCR, at least 1 of the markers was found in 53% of stage I patients, 100% of stage II, 71% of stage III and 81% of stage IV lung cancer patients. Blood samples from 20 healthy volunteers were also tested, but only 1 of the 5 transcripts was found in 1 patient. These new molecular markers may aid early detection, staging and follow-up of lung cancer patients by RNA isolated from blood.

Lung tumor markers of cytokeratin origin: an overview

Lung tumor markers fall into several categories including oncofetal proteins, structural proteins and their fragments, enzymes, membrane antigens, peptide and non-peptide hormones. Cytokeratins (CK) are well known structural proteins whose degradation gives rise to soluble fragments, measurable in the blood of patients and capable of cancer marking. Among them, Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA), Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (TPS) and Cytokeratin-19-Fragments (Cyfra 21-1) are the most studied CK fragments' complexes. This article will review biological characteristics and clinical properties of these substances, emphasizing as their concentration in the peripheral blood might reflect the mass of tumor, the rate of cancer cell lysis, and other potentially unfavorable tumor characteristics. Assaying the concentration of CK fragments in the blood is an easy and effective way to assess lung cancer and monitor its clinical evolution.

Cytokeratin-derived markers of lung cancer

Various evaluation methods are available for aiding clinicians in lung cancer management. Some of these methods are highly specific. However, they are also invasive and burdened by non-negligible complication rates (e.g., mediastinoscopy); other methods are highly accurate and noninvasive, but require expensive equipment and well-trained personnel (e.g., PET scanning); others are fast, inexpensive and safe. However, their diagnostic yield is low and requires further clinical testing (an example of such tests is the chest-x-ray film). There is probably only one way to perform an easy, inexpensive, repeatable test, which is also fairly accurate and predictive. This is tumor marker testing, which--as a large and specialized literature shows--can be highly effective when based on a cytokeratin-derived marker assay.

Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of six tumor markers in patients with pleural effusion. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and total sialic acid (TSA) were assayed in 74 patients with pleural effusions (44 malignant and 30 benign). All tumor markers except TSA and NSE were increased in both serum and pleural fluid of patients with malignant diseases. Using the cut-off values 3 ng/ml, 14 U/ml, 5 U/ml, 8 ng/ml and 70 mg/dl for pleural fluid CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1 and TSA, respectively, the sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of these tumor markers were as follows: CEA; 52/77, CA 15-3; 80/93, CA 19-9; 36/83, CYFRA 21-1; 91/90, TSA; 80/67, for differentiating malignant effusions from benign. When CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 combined, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100 and 83%, respectively). Classifying the malignant effusions as bronchial carcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma, CEA was shown to have the highest sensitivity and specificity (88 and 90%, respectively) while the combination of CEA with other tumor markers increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. According to our results, tumor markers are not suitable for the differential diagnosis of malignancy.

An evaluation of the tumour markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin marker (CYFRA 21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the diagnostic value of the tumour markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment marker (CYFRA 21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the differentiation of malignant (MSPLs) from benign solitary pulmonary lesions (BSPLs).

METHODS

Solitary pulmonary lesions (SPLs) were diagnosed using plain radiography and spiral computed tomography (SCT) and then completely removed by surgery in 104 consecutive patients (MSPLs; n = 81, BSPLs; n = 23). The serum concentrations of the tumour markers were determined 1-3 days prior to surgery by ELISA for CEA and CYFRA 21-1 and by IRMA for NSE using commercially available assay kits. The cut-off values were set at 3 ng/ml (for non-smokers) and 5 ng/ml (for smokers) for CEA, at 3.3 ng/ml for CYFRA 21-1 and at 12.5 ng/ml for NSE.

RESULTS

MSPLs were identified with a sensitivity between 13.6 and 45.7%, a specificity between 87.0 and 100% and an accuracy between 32.7 and 54.8%. Using the tumour markers alone, the highest sensitivity (27.2%) and accuracy (40.4%) was found with CEA, the highest specificity (100%) with CYFRA 21-1 and with NSE. Primary lung cancers (n = 39) were identified with a sensitivity between 17.9 and 61.5%, a specificity between 87.0 and 100% and an accuracy between 48.4 and 71.0%. Using the tumour markers alone, the highest sensitivity (35.9%) and accuracy (59.7%) was found with CYFRA 21-1, the highest specificity (100%) with CYFRA 21-1 and with NSE. The combination of all three tumour markers resulted in a greater sensitivity and greater diagnostic accuracy but a loss in specificity compared with CYFRA 21-1 and NSE.

CONCLUSION

The use of the tumour markers alone or in combination showed a low sensitivity and low accuracy for the diagnostic differentiation of MSPLs from BSPLs and primary lung cancers from BSPLs. However, both CYFRA 21-1 and NSE exhibited a specificity of 100% and may be useful complements to standard clinical imaging methods.

Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 125, neuron specific enolase, and squamous cell antigen level determinations in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge the role of tumor marker determination in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions has not been established definitively. The current article reports the results of a study of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell antigen (SCC), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions of diverse etiologies.

METHODS

One hundred forty-six patients with pleural effusions (43 malignant, 47 tuberculous, 32 miscellaneous benign, and 24 paramalignant) were studied prospectively. Levels of CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CEA, NSE, and SCC were measured by radioimmunoassay in the pleural fluid in all patients and in the serum in 118 patients.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the serum and pleural fluid levels of tumor markers with the exception of CA 125, which was higher in the pleural fluid. With maximum specificity, the highest sensitivity in the diagnosis of pleural malignancy was obtained with a combination of CYFRA 21-1 (with a cutoff value of 150 U/L), CEA (with a cutoff value of 40 ng/mL), and CA 125 (with a cutoff value of 1000 ng/mL) in pleural fluid. NSE and SCC added no diagnostic value. The simultaneous use of tumor markers and cytology in pleural fluid increased the sensitivity from 55.8% to 81%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that a combination of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, and CA 125 in the pleural fluid can be a useful addition to pleural cytology in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.

Evaluation of cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor marker in malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

The aim was to investigate the diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1 (cytokeratin 19 fragment) as a tumor marker in pleural effusion and evaluate the value of combining CYFRA 21-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assays as a diagnostic aid in the malignant pleural effusion.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-six patients (72 malignant and 54 benign pleural effusion) were included in this retrospective study. The effusion levels of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were measured using radioimmunometric assay.

RESULTS

The median values of CYFRA 21-1 in benign and malignant pleural effusion are 15 and 70 ng/ml, respectively. Using a cut-off value of 50 ng/ml, defined at 94% specificity, the diagnostic sensitivity of CYFRA 21-1 for non-small cell lung carcinoma (n = 61), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 21), adenocarcinoma (n = 40) and small cell lung cancer (n = 11) was 64, 71, 60 and 18%, respectively. Regardless of cell types, the diagnostic sensitivity of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA in malignant pleural effusion (n = 72) was 57 and 60%, respectively (cut-off value of 10 ng/ml in CEA assay). Combining CEA with CYFRA 21-1, the diagnostic sensitivity may increase up to 72%, which was defined at 89% specificity.

CONCLUSION

CYFRA 21-1 assay may be a useful tumor marker for discriminating benign from malignant pleural effusion, especially in those of non-small cell lung cancer. The combined use of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 assay in the malignant effusion may increase the diagnostic yield compared with CEA or CYFRA 21-1 alone.

Cytokeratin expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and oral cavity: an immunohistochemical study with possible clinical relevance

OBJECTIVE

Serologic identification of the fragment of cytokeratin 19 known as CYFRA 21-1 has been used for early detection of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. The sensitivity of the CYFRA 21-1 assay in detecting oral cancers is lower than that in detecting lung cancers. To clarify the reason for this, we compared the cytokeratin expression in these cancers, with special reference to cytokeratin 19.

STUDY DESIGN

Oral squamous cell carcinomas and lung squamous cell carcinomas were immunostained with cytokeratin 19, cytokeratin 10, and cytokeratin 13 antibodies. Staining intensity was scored on a graduated scale from 0 to 4.

RESULTS

With respect to cytokeratin 19, the stainings of all lung cancers were scored as 4, which indicates a greater expression of cytokeratin 19 than is seen in oral cancers (p < 0.01). With an average cytokeratin 19 staining score of 1.67, oral cancers ranked lowest among the antibodies. Squamous cell carcinomas of the maxillary sinus arising from pseudostratified ciliated epithelium were highly expressive of cytokeratin 19. A marker for keratinizing cells (cytokeratin 10) and a marker for squamous cells (cytokeratin 13) were expressed more frequently and intensely in oral cancers (p < 0.01) than in lung cancers (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

From the viewpoint of immunohistochemistry, cytokeratin 19 was found to be a tumor marker with low specificity and sensitivity in oral cancers. The staining results suggested that poor expression of cytokeratin 19 by oral squamous cell carcinoma may result in a low serum value of CYFRA 21-1 in patients with this condition.