A Phase II trial of neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma

Preoperative concurrent paclitaxel-radiation in locally advanced breast cancer: pathologic response correlates with five-year overall survival

We have previously demonstrated high pathologic response rates after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We now report disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the context of pathologic response. 105 LABC patients (White 46%, Non-White 54%) were treated with paclitaxel (30 mg/m² intravenously twice a week) for 10-12 weeks. Daily radiotherapy was delivered to breast, axillary, and supraclavicular lymph nodes during weeks 2-7 of paclitaxel treatment, at 1.8 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 45 Gy with a tumor boost of 14 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as the absence of invasive cancer in breast and lymph nodes and pathological partial response (pPR) as the persistence of <10 microscopic foci of invasive carcinoma in breast or lymph nodes. Pathologic response (pCR and pPR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation was achieved in 36/105 patients (34%) and was associated with significantly better DFS and OS. Pathological responders had a lower risk of recurrence or death (HR = 0.35, P = 0.01) and a longer OS (HR = 4.27, P = 0.01) compared with non-responders. Median DFS and OS were 57 and 84 months for non-responders, respectively, and have not yet been reached for responders. Importantly, pathologic response was achieved in 54% of patients with HR negative tumors (26/48). In conclusion, pathologic response to concurrent paclitaxel-radiation translated into superior DFS and OS. Half of the patients with HR negative tumors achieved a pathologic response.

Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background:

Although a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with favourable outcomes, a small proportion of patients with pCR have recurrence. This study was designed to identify factors predictive of recurrence in patients with pCR.

Methods:

A total of 449 breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 88 evaluable patients had a pCR, defined as no evidence of invasive carcinoma in the breast at surgery. The clinical stage was II in 61 patients (69%), III in 27 (31%). All patients received taxanes and 92% received anthracyclines. Among 43 patients with HER2-positive tumours, 27 received trastuzumab. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.

Results:

Median follow-up was 46.0 months. There were 12 recurrences, including 8 distant metastases. The rate of locoregional recurrence was 10.4% after breast-conserving surgery, as compared with 2.5% after mastectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that axillary metastases (hazard ratio (HR), 13.6; P<0.0001) and HER2-positive disease (HR, 5.0; P<0.019) were significant predictors of recurrence. Five of six patients with both factors had recurrence. Inclusion of trastuzumab was not an independent predictor among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Conclusion:

Our study results suggest that HER2 status and axillary metastases are independent predictors of recurrence in patients with pCR.

A proof-of-principle study of epigenetic therapy added to neoadjuvant doxorubicin cyclophosphamide for locally advanced breast cancer

Background

Aberrant DNA methylation and histone deacetylation participate in cancer development and progression; hence, their reversal by inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylases (HDACs) is at present undergoing clinical testing in cancer therapy. As epigenetic alterations are common to breast cancer, in this proof-of-concept study demethylating hydralazine, plus the HDAC inhibitor magnesium valproate, were added to neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in locally advanced breast cancer to assess their safety and biological efficacy.

Methodology

This was a single-arm interventional trial on breast cancer patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00395655). After signing informed consent, patients were typed for acetylator phenotype and then treated with hydralazine at 182 mg for rapid-, or 83 mg for slow-acetylators, and magnesium valproate at 30 mg/kg, starting from day –7 until chemotherapy ended, the latter consisting of four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² every 21 days. Core-needle biopsies were taken from primary breast tumors at diagnosis and at day 8 of treatment with hydralazine and valproate.

Main Findings

16 patients were included and received treatment as planned. All were evaluated for clinical response and toxicity and 15 for pathological response. Treatment was well-tolerated. The most common toxicity was drowsiness grades 1–2. Five (31%) patients had clinical CR and eight (50%) PR for an ORR of 81%. No patient progressed. One of 15 operated patients (6.6%) had pathological CR and 70% had residual disease <3 cm. There was a statistically significant decrease in global 5^mC content and HDAC activity. Hydralazine and magnesium valproate up- and down-regulated at least 3-fold, 1,091 and 89 genes, respectively.

Conclusions

Hydralazine and magnesium valproate produce DNA demethylation, HDAC inhibition, and gene reactivation in primary tumors. Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide treatment is safe, well-tolerated, and appears to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy. A randomized phase III study is ongoing to support the efficacy of so-called epigenetic or transcriptional cancer therapy.

Issues in the assessment of the pathologic effect of primary systemic therapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that induction of pathologic complete response (pCR) after primary systemic therapy (PST) is, at least to some extent, predictive of survival. However, standards for processing surgical specimens and for histopathologic evaluation of the pathologic response to therapy appear to be lacking.

METHODS

To perform a systematic review of representative articles on this topic, a computerized (MEDLINE) search was undertaken followed by a manual search based on the reference lists of the publications identified.

RESULTS

Several classification systems have been used to assess pathologic response to PST, the term pCR has not been applied in a consistent standardized manner, and only limited information is available about the reliability and validity of these classification systems. However, definitions of pCR can be summarized as follows: near pCR, only focal invasive tumor residues in the removed breast; quasi pCR, total or near total disappearance of invasive tumor in the removed breast; pCRinv, only in situ tumor residual in the removed breast; comprehensive pCR, no evidence of residual invasive tumor in the removed breast; strict pCR, disappearance of all tumor cells in the removed breast; comprehensive pCR (br+n), no evidence of residual invasive tumor in the breast and axillary nodes; strict pCR (br+n), no malignant tumor cells in the removed breast and axillary nodes. Comparison of the use of the term "pCR" in various trials reveals that it is not applied equivalently in these studies.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of pCR needs to be standardized, with verification for reliability and validity. For now, the non-equivalency in the definition of pCR should be taken into account when comparing the results of PST.

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with immunohistochemistry-confirmed HER2-positive LABC or inflammatory breast cancer received 12 weeks of docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab with filgrastim, followed by surgery, adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and locoregional radiotherapy with or without tamoxifen. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast.

RESULTS

Baseline mean tumor size was 9.2 cm (range, 4 to 32 cm). pCR occurred in breast in 11 patients (23%; 95% CI, 12% to 37%) and breast and axilla in eight patients (17%; 95% CI, 8% to 30%). pCR rates in breast (HER2 positive, seven of 30 patients, 23% v HER2 negative, four of 18 patients, 22%; P > .05) and breast and axilla (four of 30 patients, 13% v four of 18 patients, 22%, respectively; P > .05) were similar regardless of HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). At a median follow-up time of 43 months, 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 81% (95% CI, 64% to 90%); overall survival (OS) rate was 86% (95% CI, 71% to 94%). In patients with pCR in breast and axilla, PFS and OS rates were 100% (95% CI, inestimable). In patients without pCR, PFS rate was 76% (95% CI, 57% to 88%; P = .15, log-rank test), and OS rate was 83% (95% CI, 66% to 92%; P = .21). Survival rates were similar regardless of FISH status. There were only two grade 4 adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Twelve weeks of docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab is clinically active and leads to excellent survival in patients with large, HER2-positive tumors.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer: an early response predicts good prognosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-two LABC patients were treated with neoadjuvant iFAC chemotherapy including infusional 5-FU (1000 mg/m2, continuous intravenous infusion, days 1-3), adriamycin (40 mg/m2, intravenous bolus, day 1) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, intravenous bolus, day 1) every 3 weeks until maximum tumor response. Patients subsequently received surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy as appropriate.

RESULTS

Downstaging occurred in 71 of the 82 patients (86.6%). Seventy-two patients (67 patients with downstaging and five patients without downstaging) were resectable (resectability rate, 87.8%). The clinical response rate was 84.2%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 17.1% and a pathological CR rate of 7.8%. During 891 cycles of chemotherapy, the most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was leukopenia (36.0%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The median follow-up period was 51 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 66 months, and a 5 year OS rate of 50.9% for all patients. The 5 year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the 64 patients who underwent surgery were 55.8% and 44.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with iFAC had a comparable response rate and DFS to the conventional bolus FAC regimen, with an acceptable toxicity in LABC using the AJCC 2002 staging system. An early response to neoadjuvant iFAC was a favorable prognostic factor.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer can potentially downstage disease prior to definitive surgery. In this study, a doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant regimen was administered to stage III breast cancer patients to assess 1) primary tumor response, 2) tumor involvement of resection margins, and 3) predictive value in cancer outcome. Eighty-two patients with stage IIIA and IIIB breast cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 2003 were studied. All patients received similar chemotherapy regimens, consisting of doxorubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil, plus surgery and radiation therapy. End points measured include primary tumor response [complete response (CR) = 100%, partial response (PR) >50%, or no response (NR) ≤50%], resection margins for tumor, disease-free, and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were performed. Of the 82 patients studied, 34 received neoadjuvant therapy, 48 received conventional postoperative treatment. Seventy-two per cent of the stage IIIB and 22 per cent of the stage IIIA patients received neoadjuvant therapy. In the neoadjuvant group, 29 (85%) patients demonstrated tumor response, 9 (26%) of which were CR. Tumor-free resection margins were achieved in 94 per cent of the neoadjuvant group. Survival analysis demonstrated no benefit comparing neoadjuvant versus postoperative adjuvant therapy but hints at improved disease-free survival in neoadjuvant CR patients (log-rank test, P = 0.07). Eighty-five per cent of patients with stage III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced clinical response, with 26 per cent CR, and 97 per cent tumor-free resection margins. CR may portend a better cancer outcome.

Weekly docetaxel/carboplatin as primary systemic therapy for HER2-negative locally advanced breast cancer

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of weekly docetaxel/carboplatin as primary systemic therapy (PST) for locally advanced breast cancer, we conducted a phase II study. Forty-four patients with HER2-negative locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) received docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) and carboplatin to an area under the curve of 2 mg/mL/min for 3 of 4 weeks over 16 weeks. After completion of PST, patients had breast surgery and then received 4 cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin, standard radiation therapy, and, for hormone receptorpositive tumors, tamoxifen. The mean tumor size was 9.3 cm (range, 5-24 cm). Thirty-seven patients (85%) had palpable lymph nodes; 13 patients (30%) had matted or fixed nodes (N2). Eight patients had IBC. There were 11 clinical complete responses (25%) and 29 clinical partial responses (66%), resulting in 40 objective responses (91% [95% CI, 78%-96%]). Invasive disease disappeared (pathologic complete response) from the breast and axilla in 6 patients (14% [95% CI, 5%-27%]) and from the axilla in 17 patients (39% [95% CI, 24%-55%]). The only significant adverse hematologic event was grade 3 neutropenia in 4 patients (9%). The most common adverse nonhematologic events were fatigue (84% of patients) and alopecia (84%), which were usually grade 1/2. Weekly docetaxel/carboplatin appears to be active and feasible as PST in patients with large breast tumors.

Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

This randomized, noncomparative, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of combined doxorubicin plus paclitaxel (AP) and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated breast cancer who were unsuitable for conservative surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 200 patients with T2-3, N0-1, M0 disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive preoperative chemotherapy with either doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion (AP) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (AC) every 3 weeks for 4 courses followed by surgery.

RESULTS

A pCR (eradication of invasive carcinoma in tumor and in axillary lymph nodes) was found in 16% and 10% of patients in the AP and AC arms, respectively, by study center pathologists, and in 8% and 6% of patients, respectively, by independent pathologists. Patients with pCRs tended to have unifocal disease, tumors with negative hormonal receptor status, and less differentiation (Scarff, Bloom, and Richardson scale grade 3). Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 58% and 45% of patients in the AP and AC arms, respectively. An objective clinical response was achieved in 89% of patients in the AP arm and 70% in the AC arm. At a median follow-up of 31 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients who reached pCR versus those without pCR (91% v 70%).

CONCLUSION

The encouraging pathologic and clinical responses of patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel warrant additional investigation of paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer management.

Docetaxel and Cisplatin as Primary Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced Breast Cancers

A phase II trial was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of docetaxel/cisplatin as primary or neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC). Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancers > or = 5 cm in size by palpation were treated with docetaxel/cisplatin, both at 70 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days for 4 courses. Upon completion of chemotherapy, all patients underwent modified radical mastectomy with axillary nodal dissection. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of any invasive carcinoma in the breast. Standard AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) at 60 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively, for 4 cycles was given as adjuvant therapy to maximally eradicate occult distant disease. Between March 1998 and October 2001, 57 women were entered onto this trial, 28 (49%) with inoperable T4 and inflammatory cancers. Pretreatment median tumor size was 9 cm. Thirty-six patients (63%) had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and 10 patients (18%) had tumors with HER2 overexpression. All tumors became operable after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathologic complete response in the breast was achieved in 15 patients (26%) and pCR in the breast and the axilla was achieved in 11 patients (20%). All neoadjuvant chemotherapy courses were administered at full doses without treatment delays caused by toxicity. The most common side effects were hyperglycemia, anemia, and mild neuropathy. The results of this study suggest that the docetaxel/cisplatin combination can be an effective and well-tolerated induction treatment of LABC, even in very large mostly HER2-nonoverexpressing tumors.

Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (MVAC) Regimen for Urothelial Tract Tumors

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column focuses on the commercially available and investigational agents used to treat malignant diseases and reviews issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy.

Platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: current status

Cisplatin and carboplatin are active in previously untreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with mean response rates (RRs) of 50 and 32%, respectively. In pretreated patients the RR to cisplatin/carboplatin monotherapy declines markedly to <10%. Cisplatin and carboplatin have been combined with many other cytotoxics. In first-line setting high activity has been observed in combination with taxanes or vinorelbine (RRs consistently approximately 60%). It appears that these newer combinations are superior to older regimens with etoposide (RRs 30 to 50%) or 5-fluorouracil (RRs 40 to 60%). Cisplatin-/carboplatin-based regimens with infusional 5-FU and epirubicin/paclitaxel/vinorelbine achieve high RRs of around 60 to 80%. However these regimens are difficult to administer in all patients because they require central venous access for continuous 5-FU infusion. In pretreated MBC the combinations of cisplatin-taxane/vinorelbine/gemcitabine or carboplatin-docetaxel/vinorelbine yield RRs of 40 to 50%, which are higher than those achieved with platinum-etoposide/5-FU. In locally advanced disease cisplatin-based regimens achieve very high RRs (>80%). This would suggest that in chemotherapy-naïve patients platinum-based therapy might have an important role to play. Additionally the synergy demonstrated between platinum compounds, taxanes and herceptin, in preclinical and clinical studies is of immense importance and the results of the two ongoing Breast Cancer International Research Group randomized phase III studies are eagerly awaited. These studies may help clarify the role of platinum compounds in the treatment of metastatic and possibly early breast cancer.

Local recurrence in patients with large and locally advanced breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Primary chemotherapy is being given in the treatment of large and locally advanced breast cancers, but a major concern is local relapse after therapy. This paper has examined patients treated with primary chemotherapy and surgery (either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy) and has examined the role of factors which may indicate those patients who are subsequently more likely to experience local recurrence of disease.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 173 women, with data available for 166 of these, presenting with large and locally advanced breast cancer (T2>/=4 cm, T3, T4, or N2) were treated with primary chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone and then surgery (either conservation or mastectomy with axillary surgery) followed by radiotherapy were examined.

RESULTS

The clinical response rate of these patients was 75% (21% complete and 54% partial), with a complete pathological response rate of 15%. A total of 10 patients (6%) experienced local disease relapse, and the median time to relapse was 14 months (ranging from 3 to 40). The median survival in this group was 27 months (ranging from 13 to 78). In patients having breast conservation surgery, local recurrence occurred in 2%, and in those undergoing mastectomy 7% experience local relapse of disease. Factors predicting patients most likely to experience local recurrence were poor clinical response and residual axillary nodal disease after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent local control of disease can be achieved in patients with large and locally advanced breast cancers using a combination of primary chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy. However, the presence of residual tumor in the axillary lymph nodes after chemotherapy is a predictor of local recurrence and patients with a better clinical response were also less likely to experience local disease recurrence. The size and degree of pathological response did not predict patients most likely to experience recurrence of disease.

Preoperative twice-weekly paclitaxel with concurrent radiation therapy followed by surgery and postoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemotherapy is the conventional primary treatment in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We investigated the safety and efficacy of primary twice-weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation (RT) before modified radical mastectomy followed by adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIB (T3N0) to III LABC patients were eligible. Primary chemoradiation consisted of paclitaxel, 30 mg/m(2) delivered intravenously for 1 hour twice weekly for a total of 8 to 10 weeks, and concurrent RT (45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction). Modified radical mastectomy was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of chemoradiation or on recovery of skin toxicity. Postoperatively, patients who responded to paclitaxel and RT received four cycles of doxorubicin/paclitaxel, whereas patients who did not respond received doxorubicin/cytoxan.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were accrued. Toxicity from paclitaxel/RT included grade 3 skin desquamation (7%), hypersensitivity (2%), and stomatitis (2%). Postsurgery complications occurred in six patients (14%). The only grade 4 toxicity of postmastectomy chemotherapy was hematologic (10%). Grade 3 toxicities were leukopenia (24%), infection (22%), peripheral neuropathy (17%), arthralgia and pain (17%), stomatitis (12%), fatigue (10%), esophagitis (5%), and nausea (2%). Overall clinical response rate to preoperative paclitaxel and RT was 91%. Thirty-four percent of patients achieved a pathologic response in the mastectomy specimen: 16% pathologic complete responses (clearance of invasive cancer in the breast and axillary contents) and 18% pathologic partial responses (< 10 residual microscopic foci of invasive breast cancer).

CONCLUSION

Twice-weekly paclitaxel with concurrent RT is a feasible and effective primary treatment for LABC. Future studies should compare primary chemoradiation to chemotherapy in LABC.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become popular, especially for patients with advanced breast cancer. The pros and cons of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treating breast cancer patients are reviewed. The advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are 1) overall survival and recurrence-free survival rate are the same as post-operative chemotherapy, 2) serves as an in vivo sensitivity test, 3) increases the rate of breast conserving therapy, 4) facilitates the study of cancer biology. On the other hand, the disadvantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are 1) it modifies the stage, 2) treatment delay of PD cases, 3) residual intraductal component may be left behind after breast conserving surgery, 4) there are some cases of over-treatment. Combination chemotherapy is one possible way to increase the pathological CR rate, although the optimal order and cycles have not been determined. To avoid residual cancer cells after breast conserving surgery, the shrinkage pattern should be evaluated by MRI. Core needle biopsy should be performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy to avoid over-treatment. It is essential to develop more effective regimens and stratify patients based on predictive factors.

Neo-adjuvant therapy with dose-dense docetaxel plus short-term filgrastim rescue for locally advanced breast cancer

Neo-adjuvant, dose-dense docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks x 4 cycles, was administered to 12 patients with locally advance breast cancer (LABC) (10 stage IIIa and three stage IIIb). Eligibility requirements included a PS 0-2, normal hepatic and renal function, and radiologic absence of metastatic disease. Filgrastim [granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)] was started 1 day after chemotherapy and was given for 6 days. Complete blood counts were determined weekly. Surgery was planned upon recovery from the last dose of docetaxel and followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) and radiotherapy. Patients with ER status received tamoxifen. The median age was 45 (range 34-73) and pre-treatment pathology revealed poorly differentiated infiltrating duct carcinoma in 11 and infiltrating lobular cancer in one, with positive ER/PR status in five. Twelve patients were treated, and all are evaluable for response and toxicity. Nine patients had a major clinical tumor response with five PR and four pathologic complete responses (pCR rate of 33%). Three patients (of whom two with stage IIIb) had progressive disease and went on to receive neo-adjuvant therapy with AC. There was one instance of grade 3 hematologic toxicity (neutropenic fever in one G-CSF non-compliant patient). There were two instances of grade 3 extra-hematologic toxicity: one patient had severe pain and one had treatment-related fatigue. After a median follow-up of 20 months (range 7-49 months) all patients are alive and eight of nine responders remain progression-free. Despite the small size of our study, we believe that dose-dense neo-adjuvant docetaxel is well tolerated and its activity warrants confirmation in a larger number of patients.

Combination of vinorelbine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: phase II study

Achievement of a pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer can predict long-term outcome. We have investigated a combination of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and vinorelbine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). From January 1997 to May 1999, 30 chemonaive patients were treated (T2 or T3 histologically proven invasive breast carcinoma). Treatment was vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 day 1 and day 3, epirubicin 30 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 3, cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 3, every 14 days for 4 courses. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable. Median age: 48 years (range: 28-66 years); 26 had ductal invasive carcinoma and 4 lobular invasive carcinoma; median tumor size: 7 cm; median number of induction cycles: four. Clinical objective response was seen in 24 patients (relative risk: 86%), 14 complete responses, 10 partial responses, four stable disease (no significant changes). Twenty-nine patients had surgical treatment. Pathologic response rate was complete response in 32% (no residual tumor), in situ carcinoma: 11%, invasive or unchanged tumor remaining: 57%. Ninety-eight cycles were administered; major toxicities were hematologic: grade IV Hb in 5% and grade IV neutropenia in 60% of cycles. Ten patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. The vinorelbine/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide regimen resulted in a high pathologic complete response rate in LABC with a good tolerance profile, and warrants further evaluation.

Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer

Only a few papers have been published concerning the incidence and outcome of patients with a pathological complete response after cytotoxic treatment in breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients found to have a pathological complete response in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Our goal was also to determine whether the residual pathological size of the tumour in breast could be correlated with pathological node status. Between 1982 and 2000, 451 consecutive patients were registered into five prospective phase II trials. After six cycles, 396 patients underwent surgery with axillary dissection for 277 patients (69.9%). Pathological response was evaluated according to the Chevallier's classification. At a median follow-up of 8 years, survival was analysed as a function of pathological response. A pathological complete response rate was obtained in 60 patients (15.2%) after induction chemotherapy. Breast tumour persistence was significantly related to positive axillary nodes (P=5.10(-6)). At 15 years, overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in the group who had a pathological complete response than in the group who had less than a pathological complete response (P=0.047 and P=0.024, respectively). In the absence of pathological complete response and furthermore when there is a notable remaining pathological disease, axillary dissection is still important to determine a major prognostic factor and subsequently, a second non cross resistant adjuvant regimen or high dose chemotherapy could lead to a survival benefit.

Vinorelbine, epirubicin, and methotrexate (VEM) as primary treatment in locally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II trial of VEM (vinorelbine + epirubicine + methotrexate) in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer was conducted to obtain downstaging to allow surgery and breast conservation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study recruited 58 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (two patients ineligible); 56 were evaluable for response and tolerance.

RESULTS

Downstaging was obtained in 77% of the patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 9%. At 33 months of follow-up, median survival has not been reached. Neutropenia grade 3-4 was reported in 31% of cycles with 3% of cycles with infection grade 3. Alopecia grade 3 was noticed for 71% of patients.

CONCLUSION

VEM represents an effective regimen for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, allowing an important pCR. Moreover, this regimen appears to be particularly well tolerated.

Platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Interest in platinum compounds for the treatment of breast cancer has been reawakened because of preclinical studies indicating synergy of platinum salts with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in human breast cancer cell lines that overexpress HER2/neu. Cisplatin, carboplatin, and iproplatin are not very active as single agents in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The activity of oxaliplatin has not been adequately tested in refractory MBC. On the other hand, cisplatin is very active as first-line chemotherapy, with response rates (RR) of 50%; carboplatin appears to be moderately active in patients without prior chemotherapy (RR around 30%). The clinical effectiveness of the other platinum compounds (iproplatin, oxaliplatin, and others) has not yet been fully tested as first-line chemotherapy. Platinum compounds have been extensively tested in combination with other antitumoral agents. Cisplatin combinations have been employed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. These combinations are very active, although the precise contribution of cisplatin to the overall activity is not known. Combinations with cisplatin have been investigated, essentially, as salvage therapy for patients with previously treated MBC. The combinations of cisplatin with older pharmacological agents (5-fluorouracil, etoposide) have moderate activity, while the combinations of cisplatin with the newer agents (vinorelbine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine) appear to be more active. The combinations of carboplatin with the classical agents (5-fluorouracil, etoposide) are poorly active in previously treated MBC; however, the combination of carboplatin with the taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel) is more active. Of greatest interest is the synergy between the platinum derivatives and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab demonstrated in vitro in breast cancer cell lines overexpressing HER2/neu. Currently, several combinations of platinum compounds (either cisplatin or carboplatin) with docetaxel and trastuzumab are under clinical testing in patients with MBC who overexpress HER2/neu. The preliminary results are very promising, and these combinations will soon be tested in the adjuvant setting. Cisplatin, carboplatin, and perhaps, oxaliplatin appear to have some antitumor activity in MBC and can be combined safely with other agents that are active in this disease. However, the precise role that platinum compounds play in the treatment of breast cancer remains to be defined.

High complete pathological response in locally advanced breast cancer using paclitaxel and cisplatin

BACKGROUND

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high response rate in metastatic breast cancer using paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C). A phase II study using the same regimen (PC) has been conducted in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

METHODS

A total of 72 consecutive patients with non-inflammatory LABC (T2 > or = 4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N2, M0). Patients were scheduled to receive 3-4 cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received 6 cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2). Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor positive tumors were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years.

RESULTS

The median age was 39 years (range, 24-78). Clinically, 7%, 58%, and 35% of patients had T2 > or = 4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIB (33%), IIIA (27%), and IIIB (40%). Complete and partial clinical response to PC was demonstrated in 13 (18%), and 52 (72%) patients, respectively. Of those patients with evaluable pathologic response (68 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 15 (22%) patients. At a median follow-up of 22 (+/- 3.5) months, 58 (81%) were alive with no recurrence, nine (12%) were alive with evidence of disease, and five (7%) were dead. None of the patients achieving pCR has developed any relapse. The median overall survival has not been reached for all 72 patients with a projected 3-year survival (+/- SE) of 90% (+/- 4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.1 (+/- 4.8) months with a projected PFS of 74% +/- 7% at 3-years (for 68 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

PC regimen in LABC produced a high pCR. The contribution of the other added modalities to survival could not be assessed.

Dose-intensive chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

The availability of hematopoietic growth factors has allowed a range of feasibility and uncontrolled studies with high-dose chemotherapy (with or without stem-cell support) to take place. Preliminary data from some randomized studies are now available as well. Dose-intensive chemotherapy appears to be effective in downstaging the tumor. Only a minority of patients achieve a pathologic complete remission and additional therapeutic options to control minimal residual disease are urgently needed. There are few indications that high-dose chemotherapy is superior to conventional dose therapy in terms of relapse-free or overall survival. Although the results of most randomized studies are premature or unknown at this time, a modest but clinically significant survival advantage may still emerge.

Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess patient and tumor characteristics associated with a complete pathologic response (pCR) in both the breast and axillary lymph node specimens and the outcome of patients found to have a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred seventy-two LABC patients received treatment in two prospective neoadjuvant trials using four cycles of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. Patients had a total mastectomy with axillary dissection or segmental mastectomy and axillary dissection followed by four or more cycles of additional chemotherapy. Patients then received irradiation treatment of the chest-wall or breast and regional lymphatics. Median follow-up was 58 months (range, 8 to 99 months).

RESULTS

The initial nodal status, age, and stage distribution of patients with a pCR were not significantly different from those of patients with less than a pCR (P>.05). Patients with a pCR had initial tumors that were more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (P<.01), and anaplastic (P = .01) but of smaller size (P<.01) than those of patients with less than a pCR. Upon multivariate analysis, the effects of ER status and nuclear grade were independent of initial tumor size. Sixteen percent of the patients in this study (n = 60) had a pathologic complete primary tumor response. Twelve percent of patients (n = 43) had no microscopic evidence of invasive cancer in their breast and axillary specimens. A pathologic complete primary tumor response was predictive of a complete axillary lymph node response (P<.01 ). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in the group who had a pCR (89% and 87%, respectively) than in the group who had less than a pCR (64% and 58%, respectively; P<.01).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has the capacity to completely clear the breast and axillary lymph nodes of invasive tumor before surgery. Patients with LABC who have a pCR in the breast and axillary nodes have a significantly improved disease-free survival rate. However, a pCR does not entirely eliminate recurrence. Further efforts should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms associated with this response.