Expression of cytokeratin 19 in cytologic specimens of thyroid

Diagnostic Value of TROP-2 and CK19 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Both Surgical and Cytological Specimens

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) represents the most common primary malignant thyroid tumor and its diagnosis is dependent on the presence of classic nuclear features that are sometimes seen in some non-neoplastic and benign lesions. Several immunohistochemical markers are used individually or in combination to help in differentiation of PTC from mimickers. The aim of the current study was to assess the diagnostic value of TROP-2 and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) expression in differentiating PTC from other mimickers both singly and in combination. The current study was carried out on 77 surgical specimens (56 PTC and 21 non-neoplastic cases) and 12 cytological specimens (4 THY2, 6 THY4, and 2 THY5). TROP-2 was negative in 81% of non-neoplastic surgical specimens and in 100% of THY2 cytological specimens while it was positive in 71.4% of PTC surgical specimens and 100% of THY4/THY5 cytological specimens. Sensitivity and specificity of TROP-2 positive expression for diagnosis of PTC in surgical specimens reached 71% and 81%, respectively, while it reached 100% for both in cytological specimens. Cytokeratin 19 showed positive expression in 85.7% of non-neoplastic surgical specimens and in 92.9% of PTC surgical specimens. Cytokeratin 19 showed negative expression in 75% of Thy2 cases while it was positive in all studied Thy4 and Thy5 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of CK19 total estimated score for diagnosis of PTC in surgical specimens were 78.6% and 66.7%, respectively, while it reached 100% and 75% in cytological specimens. Positive TROP-2 and CK19 expression in PTC were associated with lymph node metastasis. TROP-2 is a specific rather than sensitive marker while CK19 is a sensitive rather than specific marker in differentiating PTC from other mimickers in surgical specimens. The diagnostic validity of both markers was superior in diagnosis of classic PTC compared with follicular variant PTC. TROP-2 is superior to CK19 in diagnosis of PTC in cytological specimens. Both TROP-2 and CK19 could be used preoperatively in adjunct to hematoxylin and eosin for more confident diagnosis of thyroid cytology and along with radiology as predictors of lymph node metastasis.

HBME-1 and CK19 are highly discriminatory in the cytological diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma

The cytologic diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma is straightforward in most instances. However, there are some mimics including goitrous nodules and Hurthle cell neoplasms. Many studies have shown the combination of HBME-1 and CK19 expression to be useful in reaching a correct histologic diagnosis on tissue sections. We aim to assess the value of these markers in the setting of cell blocks prepared from needle aspiration specimens. We performed immunohistochemical staining of HBME-1 and CK19 on cell block material from 22 thyroid nodules that also had follow-up histology. Both CK19 and HBME-1 were strongly positive in all nine cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma, the latter showing distinct luminal accentuation. In the non-papillary carcinomas, none showed positivity for both HBME-1 and CK19. Two of six Hurthle cell neoplasms were positive for CK19, however all were negative for HBME-1. One of nine goitrous nodules was strongly positive for HBME-1 with luminal/membranous staining, but this were negative for CK19. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of HBME-1 in distinguishing between papillary thyroid carcinoma and goitrous nodules/Hurthle cell neoplasms were found to be 100%, 92.9% and 0.9, respectively; and that of HBME-1 and CK19 combination was 100%, 100% and 1. We thus conclude that the combination of positive HBME-1 (luminal/membranous) and CK 19 (cytoplasmic) staining on cell blocks of thyroid cytologic specimens is highly discriminatory in the diagnostic workup for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Usefulness of HBME-1, cytokeratin 19 and galectin-3 immunostaining in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy

AIMS

To investigate the usefulness of immunohistochemical expression and immunolocalization of a panel of thyroid malignancy markers including HBME-1, cytokeratin (CK) 19 and galectin-3.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 170 thyroid lesions including 148 neoplastic lesions [84 papillary carcinomas (PC), 38 follicular carcinomas (FC), 18 follicular adenomas, one hyalinizing trabecular tumour, five medullary carcinomas, two anaplastic carcinomas] and 22 non-neoplastic lesions (12 adenomatous nodules and 10 Hashimoto's thyroiditis). HBME-1, galectin-3 and CK 19 were expressed in 94%, 72.6%, 72.6% of PCs and in 63%, 21%, 21% of FCs. The three markers were mostly negative in all normal tissues. Although the most helpful marker in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the follicular variant of PC and for FC diagnosis was HBME-1, when we consider the differentiation between cases of follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC) and FC or adenoma, in terms of percentage of positive cells, galectin-3 and CK 19 were more relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

HBME-1 is the most sensitive marker for thyroid malignancy but the three markers may be useful in specific cases. This panel of markers is useful to differentiate the follicular patterned lesions, with special reference to the FVPC.

Cytokeratin 19 immunolocalization in cell block preparation of thyroid aspirates. An adjunct to fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) is a useful ancillary technique for diagnosing papillary thyroid carcinoma (papillary carcinoma) in histologic specimens. Although similar results have been obtained on aspirate smears, to our knowledge the utility of CK-19 immunolocalization in cell block preparations as an adjunct to fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of papillary carcinoma has not been examined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether CK-19 immunostaining of cell block preparations of thyroid aspirates is a useful ancillary technique for diagnosing papillary carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a monoclonal antibody to CK-19 and a standard avidin-biotin complex technique, immunostaining was performed on paraffin-embedded cell blocks of 57 cases with the following cytologic diagnoses: (a) papillary carcinoma (20 cases); (b) atypical cytology, cannot exclude papillary carcinoma (19 cases); and (c) nonneoplastic thyroid (18 cases). The staining reaction in each case was graded on the basis of percentage of epithelial cells stained (1+, <10%; 2+, <10%-50%; 3+, >50). Tissue follow-up was available in all cases.

RESULTS

Nineteen (95%) of 20 cases with an unequivocal diagnosis of papillary carcinoma were positive for CK-19 (3+). Tissue follow-up confirmed papillary carcinoma in all 20 cases. Of the 19 cases with a diagnosis of atypical cytology, cannot exclude papillary carcinoma, 7 (37%) cases displayed 3+ immunostaining and subsequent excision confirmed papillary carcinoma in all 7 cases. The remaining 12 cases with 1+ immunostaining included surgically confirmed goiter (6 cases), adenoma (2 cases), lymphocytic thyroiditis (3 cases), and papillary carcinoma (1 case). The follicular cells in 18 cases with a cytologic diagnosis of nonneoplastic thyroid showed 1+ immunostaining. Histologic follow-up of these cases confirmed the nonneoplastic cytologic diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytokeratin 19 immunostaining of cell block preparations of thyroid aspirates serves as a useful tool for the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma. Strong immunostaining (3+) for CK-19 aids in accurate diagnosis of malignancy in cytomorphologically equivocal cases of papillary carcinoma.

Aspiration cytology of pediatric solitary papillary hyperplastic thyroid nodule

CONTEXT

Solitary papillary hyperplastic thyroid nodules (SPHTNs) are frequently encountered in children and teenagers. Although the histologic features are well described, to the best of our knowledge, cytologic findings have not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To review the cytologic features of histologically proven SPHTNs and to identify the potential diagnostic pitfalls in cytologic diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of 3 histologically proven SPHTNs was reviewed.

RESULTS

Two girls and 1 boy (ages 11, 12, and 15 years) were affected. The cytologic diagnosis in all 3 cases was suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The spectrum of cytologic findings included broad flat sheets and 3-dimensional clusters with fire flares. There was mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism and nuclear atypia. Short nonbranching papillae with transgressing vessels shown to represent hyperplastic papillae on histologic sections were identified in all cases. The background contained giant cells, histiocytes, and watery and inspissated colloid. Although nuclear grooves were identified in occasional cells, intranuclear inclusions were absent. A cell block section (1 case) and histologic sections of SPHTNs (2 cases) were immunohistochemically negative for cytokeratin 19.

CONCLUSIONS

Fine-needle aspiration of SPHTNs may be difficult to interpret accurately and can result in false-positive diagnosis of PTC. Although it shares several cytologic features with PTC, the presence of fire flares and short nonbranching papillae, as well as lack of intranuclear inclusions and watery and inspissated colloid in SPHTN appear to be useful features that are helpful in distinguishing SPHTN from PTC. Negative immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin 19 is useful in excluding a diagnosis of PTC.