Presenting Exogenous Antigen to T Cells

Evaluating Macrophages in Immunotoxicity Testing

Macrophages are a heterogeneous group of cells that have a multitude of functions depending on their differentiation state. While classically known for their phagocytic and antigen presentation abilities, it is now evident that these cells fulfill homeostatic functions beyond the elimination of invading pathogens. In addition, macrophages have also been implicated in the downregulation of inflammatory responses following pathogen removal, tissue remodeling, repair, and angiogenesis. Alterations in macrophage differentiation and/or activity due to xenobiotic exposure can have grave consequences on organismal homeostasis, potentially contributing to disease due to immunosuppression or chronic inflammatory responses, depending upon the pathways affected. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the macrophages subtypes, their origin and a general discussion of several different assays used to assess their functional status.

Evaluating macrophages in immunotoxicity testing

Macrophages are the heterogeneous grouping of cells that are derived from monocytes. They have a multitude of functions depending on their final differentiated state. These functions range from phagocytosis to antigen presentation to bone destruction, to name a few. Their importance in both the innate and acquired immune functions is undeniable. Xenobiotics that degrade their functional status can have grave consequences. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the types of macrophages, their hematopoietic origin and a general discussion of the many different assays that are used to assess their functional status.

The geometry of synthetic peptide-based immunogens affects the efficiency of T cell stimulation by professional antigen-presenting cells

In the pathway leading to antibody production there are two points at which CD4(+) T(h) cells need to be recruited. The first of these is priming of T cells by their interaction with dendritic cells (DC) bearing antigen presented on MHC class II molecules and the second is the collaborative interaction of these primed T cells with B cells presenting the same antigen. We have previously shown that the configuration of T and B cell determinants within synthetic peptide immunogens can greatly influence the amount of immunogen required to produce an antibody response. Here we investigate whether the difference in potency of different immunogens is related to their ability to be presented by either DC or B cells. We show that determinants in a branched configuration, which are the most efficient at eliciting antibody in vivo, are presented to T cell clones by splenic CD8(-) DC 10-fold more efficiently than the corresponding determinants in a tandem linear arrangement. B cells also showed preferential presentation of branched immunogens to one T cell clone but in contrast to DC, not to a second T cell clone, indicating differences between the two antigen-presenting cell types. We also show that branched immunogens have a greater stability in serum compared to linear peptides, which may further enhance the differences in their in vivo potency.