Lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas area

Estimation of the organ of origin of peri-ampullary malignancy by preoperative CT scan

BACKGROUND

Tumors occurring within the pancreatic head commonly arise from the pancreas, duodenal ampulla, distal bile duct, or duodenum. However, they are difficult to distinguish on standard preoperative imaging.

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of specialist reporting of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to determine the organ of origin of pancreatic cancer (PC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Blinded re-reporting of preoperative imaging from five hospitals was undertaken of a consecutive cohort of 411 patients undergoing surgery for PC between January 2006 and May 2014. Radiological identification of tumor site was determined by the presence of the main tumor bulk within the pancreatic head parenchyma and estimation of the pathological organ of origin of the PC was based on all the reported features.

RESULTS

Each pathological tumor type was noted to have distinct radiological features. Localization of a visible tumor within the pancreatic parenchyma was seen most commonly in PC (92%) than other tumor types (P < 0.0001). Local invasion into the duodenum was a characteristic feature seen in 79% of patients with ampullary tumors and isolated dilation of the bile duct without dilation of the pancreatic duct was seen most commonly in patients with ampullary or bile duct cancer. In the assessment of tumor origin, good agreement (kappa = 0.6, 0.51-0.68) was noted between the consensus radiology opinion and the final histology result. Overall accuracy was greatest for ampullary cancer (88.1%) and lowest for PC (83.2%).

CONCLUSION

Radiological assessment of preoperative imaging provides a high degree of accuracy in predicting the organ of origin of peri-ampullary cancer.

Factors associated with metastasis in superior mesenteric vein lymph node in subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Retrospective case control study

Objective

The revised Japanese treatment guideline for gastric cancer recommends dissection of the superior mesenteric vein lymph node (No. 14v LN) if there is metastasis in infrapyloric lymph node (No. 6 LN). However, it is still controversial whether LN dissection is necessary. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with metastasis in No. 14v LN.

Methods

Patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy between 2003 and 2010 were included. We excluded patients who underwent total gastrectomy, had multiple lesions, or had missing data about the status of metastasis in the LNs that were included in D2 lymphadenectomy. Clinicopathologic characteristics and the metastasis in regional LNs were compared between patients with No. 14v LN metastasis (14v+) and those without (14v−).

Results

Five hundred sixty patients were included in this study. Univariate analysis showed that old age, larger tumor size, tumor location, differentiation, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, T classification, and N classification were related to metastasis in No. 14v LN. Multivariate analysis showed differentiation (P=0.027) and N classification (P<0.001) were independent related factors. Metastasis in infrapyloric lymph node (No. 6 LN) and proxiaml splenic lymph node (No. 11p LN) was independently associated with metastasis in No. 14v LN.

Conclusions

Differentiation and N classification were independent factors associated with No. 14v LN metastasis, and No. 6 and No. 11p LN metastasis were independent risk factors for No. 14v LN metastasis.

Exploration of peripancreatic lymphatic pathways in a live porcine model

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis, mainly due to lymph node invasion and lymph node recurrence after surgical resection, even after extended lymphadenectomy. The peripancreatic lymphatic system is highly complex and the specific lymphatic drainage of each part of the pancreas has not been established. The aim of this study was to determine the lymphatic drainage pathways specific to each part of the pancreas on live pigs using Patent Blue. The pancreases of 14 live pigs were injected in different parts of the gland. The technique was efficient and reproducible. The diffusion patterns were similar for each location and were reported. Our results in pigs allowed us to define specific nodal relay stations and lymphatic drainage for each part of the pancreas and confirm that independent anatomical-surgical pancreatic segments can be described. It is interesting to note that lymphatic drainage for the upper part of the proximal part of pancreas (duodenal lobe) occurred on the left side of the portal vein. This suggests that lymph node resection during cephalic duodenopancreatectomy in humans should be extended to the left side of the mesenteric vein, and probably to the right side of the superior mesenteric artery, as recently suggested. These results could help surgeons perform safe anatomical-segmental pancreatic resections with accurate lymphadenectomies and improve survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Based on these results we will perform an innovative prospective study. Patent Blue will be injected into different parts of the gland in patients operated for pancreatic resection, and lymphatic diffusion of the dye will be recorded in relation to their origin from the theoretical pancreatic segments (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03597230).

Pancreatic Cancer: Feasibility and Outcome After Radiochemotherapy with High Dose External Radiotherapy for Non-resected and R1 Resected Patients

Background Non-resected locally advanced and microscopic positive-margin resected (R1) pancreatic adenocarcinoma are associated with a dismal prognosis. The combination of high dose radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy is among the strategies that are used to improve the outcome. The aims of this study were to evaluate the acute and late toxicities and patients' outcome in a retrospective study from a single center. Material and methods From 2009 to 2015, 24 patients, with non-resected locally advanced or R1 resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, have been treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy, with a median dose of 60 Gy and gemcitabine (50 mg/m² administered bi-weekly). The acute and late toxicities were evaluated during and after the treatment. Results The actuarial overall survival rates were 39% at 24 months and 8.6% at 36 months. The disease-free survival rates were 32.5% at 24 months and 12.2% at 36 months. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 (G1) to grade 2 (G2) except for one patient who presented with severe digestive bleeding potentially linked to the treatment. Late toxicities consisted mainly of G1 digestive toxicities. Conclusion This study confirms the feasibility of high dose radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. While the outcome remains unsatisfactory, some patients seem to have benefited from this aggressive therapy, which merits to be investigated further.

Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy

Background

Most pancreatoduodenectomy resections do not meet the minimum of 12 lymph nodes recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer for accurate staging of periampullary malignancies. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting the likelihood of adequate nodal yield in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens subject to routine pathological assessment.

Methods

Six hundred sixty-two patients subject to pancreatoduodenectomy between 1990 and 2013 for pancreatic, ampullary, and common bile duct cancers were reviewed. Predictors of yielding at least 12 lymph nodes were evaluated with a logistic regression model, and a survival analysis was carried out to verify the prognostic implications of nodal counts.

Results

The median number of evaluated nodes was 17 (interquartile range 11 to 25), and less than 12 lymph nodes were reported in surgical specimens of 179 (27 %) patients. Tumor diameter ≥20 mm (odds ratio [OR] 2.547, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.225 to 5.329, P = 0.013), lymph node metastases (OR 2.642, 95 % CI 1.378 to 5.061, P = 0.004), and radical lymphadenectomy (OR 5.566, 95 % CI 2.041 to 15.148, P = 0.01) were significant predictors of retrieving 12 or more lymph nodes. Lymph node counts did not influence the overall prognosis of the patients. However, a subgroup analysis carried out for individual cancer sites demonstrated that removing at least 12 lymph nodes is associated with better prognosis for pancreatic cancer.

Conclusions

Few variables affect adequate nodal yield in pancreatoduodenectomy specimens subject to routine pathological assessment. Considering the ambiguities related to the only modifiable factor identified, appropriate pathology training should be considered to increase nodal yield rather than more aggressive lymphatic dissection.

Computed Tomography after Modified Whipple Procedure with Pancreatic Duct Occlusion

Eighty-two CT examinations performed on 28 patients who had undergone a modified Whipple procedure including pancreatic duct occlusion were reviewed. Reduction of the antero-posterior diameter of the body and tail of the pancreatic remnant was observed on consecutive scans in 8 patients (29%). Decreasing liver attenuation was seen in 4 patients (14%) postoperatively, and pseudocysts in the pancreatic remnant in 6 (21%). In 10 examinations performed because of suspected intraabdominal abscess postoperatively, abscess was diagnosed in 2 patients. In 62 routine follow-up CT examinations, significant positive findings were diagnosed in 5 patients: tumor recurrence or metastases in 4, and a large pseuodocyst in one. CT is of value in the early postoperative phase to reveal postoperative complications and in the follow-up of patients with specific symptoms indicating tumor recurrence or metastases.

How Grim is Pancreatic Cancer?

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma continues to be the most lethal malignancy with rising incidence. It is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the western world due to its low treatment success rate. In addition, because of its rapid growth and silent course, diagnosis is often only established in the advanced stages. As one of the most aggressive malignancies, the treatment of this disease is a great challenge to clinicians. This paper reviewed the natural history of pancreatic cancer, the current clinical practice and the future in pancreatic cancer management.

The prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate by a meta-analytic approach the long-term prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) involvement in resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1990 to June 2015. Trials reporting Kaplan-Meier curves and comparing overall long-term survival of negative and metastatic PALN in patients who underwent resection for pancreatic cancer were included. Lymph nodes were classified according to the Japan Pancreatic Society rules and identified using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CI were estimated for each trial and pooled in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible studies including 2141 patients (364 positive PALN; 1777 negative PALN) were identified. Most of the studies were retrospective. Heterogeneity among trials was high (I(2) = 98.7%; p < .001). PALN metastasis was associated with increased mortality when compared with patients with negative PALN regardless regional nodal status [HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.48-2.31; p < .001]. Median survival was significantly decreased in patients with positive PALN (WMD = -4.92 months 95%CI -6.40; -3.43; p < .001). Moreover, metastatic PALN affected mortality also when regional lymph nodes were positive [HR 1.67, 95%CI 1.34-2.08; p < .001]. No publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

PALN metastasis appears to correlate with poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The assessment of PALN status may be considered for a more accurate staging of the disease and appropriated subgroup survival reporting. However, the definitive avoidance of the resection in case of intraoperative metastatic PALN needs further investigation.

Role of extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended lymph node dissection has been established as the method of choice in the treatment of many digestive malignancies, but its role in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

The goal is to evaluate the role of extended lymph node dissection in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and to review how it affects survival, morbidity, mortality and post-operative quality of life.

METHODS

A computerized search was made of the Medline database from January 1973 to October 2012. Fifteen non-duplicated studies, four randomized and 11 non-randomized, comparing extended radical pancreaticoduodenectomy (ERP) and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy were reviewed. Five-year overall survivals were compared using the MetaXL software in eight of these studies, where the necessary data were available.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival after ERP ranged from 6 to 33.4% and the local recurrence incidence from 8 to 36.1%, while the incidence of severe diarrhoea, one of the main complications, ranged from 10.8 to 42.4%. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21-0.20, Z=0.07, P=0.94) for randomized control trials, (95% CI: -0.51-0.02, Z=1.85, P=0.07) for non-randomized control trials and (95% CI: -0.26-0.06, Z=1.20, P=0.23) for all the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ERP is a safe procedure, it did not offer a significant improvement in survival, while at the same time leading to an increased incidence of severe diarrhoea for at least 1 year, thus leaving the standard pancreaticoduodenectomy as the surgical method of choice for the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The significance of positive para-aortic nodes in patients with resectable pancreatic carcinoma is unclear. This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative detection and prognostic significance of these lymph nodes in patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2010, para-aortic node sampling was performed prospectively in all patients before pancreatoduodenectomy. Frozen sections were created and nodes categorized as positive or negative for metastases. Surgeons were blinded to the frozen-section results. This was followed by standard histopathological assessment of corresponding paraffin-embedded, haematoxylin and eosin-stained material. Nodes considered uninvolved by this analysis were examined immunohistochemically for micrometastases.

RESULTS

A total of 111 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 20·8 (range 1·5-126) months. The 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 73·6, 54·0 and 24·7 per cent, and 51·8, 28·1 and 18·8 per cent respectively. Para-aortic node involvement was always associated with peripancreatic lymph node metastasis, and was detected by frozen-section analysis in 12 patients and by haematoxylin and eosin staining in 17. Sensitivity and specificity of frozen-section examination for detecting para-aortic lymph node metastases were 71 and 100 per cent respectively. Median OS for patients with and without para-aortic node involvement on frozen-section analysis was 9·7 versus 28·5 months respectively (P = 0·012), and 15·7 versus 27·2 months (P = 0·050) when assessed by haematoxylin and eosin staining. Median DFS for patients with and without para-aortic node involvement on frozen-section examination was 5·6 versus 12·9 months respectively (P = 0·041), and 8·4 versus 12·9 months (P = 0·038) for haematoxylin and eosin analysis. The presence of micrometastases in para-aortic nodes was not significantly associated with altered OS or DFS.

CONCLUSION

Para-aortic node sampling with frozen-section examination detects distant lymphatic involvement reliably. It should be performed systematically. When metastases are found, they should be considered a contraindication to pancreatic resection.

Extended lymphadenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer is debatable

Lymph node staging is one of the most important factors in determining the prognosis after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Despite ongoing efforts to further refine lymph node staging, the debate on the extent of lymphadenectomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy is still open. The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence about performing standard lymphadenectomy during curative resection of pancreatic cancer. All four prospective randomized controlled trials published concluded that extended lymphadenectomy does not contribute to better oncologic outcome for patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Indeed, one major drawback of extended lymphadenectomy is the higher risk of persistent postoperative diarrhea. No prospective randomized studies could be found on the role of extended lymphadenectomy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the corpus and tail. Based on current evidence there is no indication that extended lymphadenectomy should be performed routinely during resection of pancreatic cancer.

Standard and extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although some retrospective studies have recommended that pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy might improve the survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas, the procedure remains controversial.

METHODS

Using PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library databases, a systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized, controlled trials comparing standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

RESULTS

Four trials including 423 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Extended lymphadenectomy failed to improve the overall survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.41; P = 0.51). Additionally, postoperative mortality and morbidity were comparable between the standard and extended groups, while extended lymphadenectomy was associated with poor quality of life within 1 year after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended lymphadenectomy do not benefit overall survival. Considering the poor quality of life associated with extended lymphadenectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy with standard lymphadenectomy is suitable for patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

External validation of the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker on a large cohort of pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

With growing evidence on the role of inflammation in cancer biology, the presence of a systemic inflammatory response has been postulated as having prognostic significance in a wide range of cancer types. The derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), which represents an easily determinable potential prognostic marker in daily practise and clinical trials, has never been externally validated in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.

METHODS

Data from 474 consecutive PC patients, treated between 2004 and 2012 at a single centre, were evaluated retrospectively. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate the prognostic relevance of dNLR, univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied.

RESULTS

We calculated by ROC analysis a cut-off value of 2.3 for the dNLR to be ideal to discriminate between patients' survival in the whole cohort. Kaplan-Meier curve reveals a dNLR≥2.3 as a factor for decreased CSS in PC patients (p<0.001, log-rank test). An independent significant association between high dNLR≥2.3 and poor clinical outcome in multivariate analysis (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 1.01-1.51, p = 0.041) was identified.

CONCLUSION

In the present study we confirmed elevated pre-treatment dNLR as an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcome in PC patients. Our data encourage independent replication in other series and settings of this easily available parameter as well as stratified analysis according to tumor resectability.

Laparoscopic staging and surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is the tenth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, the percentage of patients presenting at the resectable stage is minimal. Although computed tomography (CT) scan remains the best modality to stage the tumor for resectability, laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound offers its own advantages. Extended lymphadenectomy, portal vein resection, and arterial reconstruction have also been explored in multiple studies to enhance staging. The traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple's procedure) with regional lymphadenectomy is still the standard of care in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Clinical target volume delineation including elective nodal irradiation in preoperative and definitive radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Currently, recommendation has been given for the delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) in adjuvant RT. Based on recently reviewed pathologic data, the aim of this study is to propose criteria for the CTV definition and delineation including elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in the preoperative and definitive treatment of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The anatomical structures of interest, as well as the abdominal vasculature were identified on intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scans of two different patients with pancreatic cancer of the head and the body. To delineate the lymph node area, a margin of 10 mm was added to the arteries.

RESULTS

We proposed a set of guidelines for elective treatment of high-risk nodal areas and CTV delineation. Reference CT images were provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed guidelines could be used for preoperative or definitive RT for carcinoma of the head and body of the pancreas. Further clinical investigations are needed to validate the defined CTVs.

Prognostic implications of lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE

The current classification of pancreatic cancer is based only on anatomic location of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). On the other hand, the number of metastatic LNs has been used in staging of colorectal, esophageal, and gastric cancers. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of the number or ratio of the metastatic LNs in pancreatic body and tail carcinoma.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy were included. Location, number, ratio of metastatic LNs, and the survival of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty patients with LN metastasis had poor prognosis (P = 0.007). The prognoses of patients with 5 or more metastatic LNs were poorer than those with less than 5 metastatic LNs (P = 0.046), and patients with a metastatic LN ratio of 0.2 or more had the worst prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that 5 or more metastatic LNs and metastatic LN ratio of 0.2 or more were independent prognostic factors for survival (P = 0.0015 and P = 0.014, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the number and the ratio of metastatic LNs can be used to predict poor patient survival and as a staging strategy.

Management of pancreatic cancer: current status and future directions

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a dismal prognosis, despite advances in surgery, and adjuvant therapy. Surgical resection with negative margins remains the mainstay of treatment, and results can be improved with neoadjuvant therapy when the lesion is of borderline respectability. Extended lymphadenectomy has no role in improving survival, but may worsen quality of life. Venous resection can be performed if it helps to achieve an R0 resection, but arterial resection is not justified. A host of newer agents, both cytotoxic and targeted, are being evaluated. The article summarizes the critical issues and looks ahead to the future.

Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010

Several advances in genetics, diagnosis and palliation of pancreatic cancer (PC) have occurred in the last decades. A multidisciplinary approach to this disease is therefore recommended. PC is relatively common as it is the fourth leading cause of cancer related mortality. Most patients present with obstructive jaundice, epigastric or back pain, weight loss and anorexia. Despite improvements in diagnostic modalities, the majority of cases are still detected in advanced stages. The only curative treatment for PC remains surgical resection. No more than 20% of patients are candidates for surgery at the time of diagnosis and survival remains quite poor as adjuvant therapies are not very effective. A small percentage of patients with borderline non-resectable PC might benefit from neo-adjuvant chemoradiation therapy enabling them to undergo resection; however, randomized controlled studies are needed to prove the benefits of this strategy. Patients with unresectable PC benefit from palliative interventions such as biliary decompression and celiac plexus block. Further clinical trials to evaluate new chemo and radiation protocols as well as identification of genetic markers for PC are needed to improve the overall survival of patients affected by PC, as the current overall 5-year survival rate of patients affected by PC is still less than 5%. The aim of this article is to review the most recent high quality literature on this topic.

Complex pancreatic surgery: safety and feasibility in the community setting

INTRODUCTION

Advances in technology, innovative surgical procedures, and enhanced perioperative care have allowed more patients to be considered for complex pancreatic surgery. Published reports on the outcomes of pancreatic surgery performed at high volume tertiary referral centers have yielded excellent results. However, similar outcome and safety data from community hospitals is limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive complex pancreatic surgery performed by a single surgeon from December 2004 to December 2009 formed the study group. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, operative procedure, operative time, length of hospital stay, pathology, and 30-day morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent pancreatic surgery, with a mean patient age of 62.4±15.2 years. Eighty-three patients (76.1%) underwent definitive surgical procedure and 26 patients (23.9%) had palliative bypass after failed palliative biliary stenting. The mean operative time was 229±109 min, the mean length of stay was 8.6±6.5 days and 24 (22.0%) patients had surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

Complex pancreatic surgery can be performed safely at high-volume tertiary community hospitals with excellent outcomes comparable to tertiary academic centers. In the ongoing debate about the need for mandatory referral of complex surgical procedures, tertiary community hospitals with well-determined outcomes should be included.

Proposing the lymphatic target volume for elective radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis of clinical evidence

Background

Radiation therapy is an important cancer treatment modality in both adjuvant and definitive setting, however, the use of radiation therapy for elective treatment of regional lymph nodes is controversial for pancreatic cancer. No consensus on proper selection and delineation of subclinical lymph nodal areas in adjuvant or definitive radiation therapy has been suggested either conclusively or proposed for further investigation. This analysis aims to study the pattern of lymph node metastasis through a pooled analysis of published results after radical tumor and lymph nodal resection with histological study in pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Literature search using electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CANCERLIT from January 1970 to June 2009 was performed, supplemented by review of references. Eighteen original researches and a total of 5954 pancreatic cancer patients underwent radical surgical resection were included in this analysis. The probability of metastasis in regional lymph nodal stations (using Japan Pancreas Society [JPS] Classification) was calculated and analyzed based on the location and other characteristics of the primary disease.

Results

Commonly involved nodal regions in patients with pancreatic head tumor include lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (Group 8, 9.79%), posterior pancreaticoduodenal lymph nodes (Group 13, 32.31%), lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery (Group 14, 15.85%), paraaortic lymph nodes (Group 16, 10.92%), and anterior pancreaticoduodenal lymph nodes (Group 17, 19.78%); The probability of metastasis in other lymph nodal regions were <9%.

Commonly involved nodal regions in patients with pancreatic body/tail tumor include lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (Group 8, 15.07%), lymph nodes around the celiac trunk (Group 9, 9.59%), lymph nodes along the splenic artery (Group 11, 35.62%), lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery (Group 14, 9.59%), paraaortic lymph nodes (Group 16, 16.44%), and inferior body lymph nodes (Group 18, 24.66%). The probability of metastasis in other lymph nodal regions were <9%.

Conclusions

Pancreatic cancer has a high propensity of regional lymphatic metastases; however, clear patterns including the site and probability of metastasis can be identified and used as a guide of treatment in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Further clinical investigation is needed to study the efficacy of elective treatment to CTV defined based on these patterns using high-dose conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Management of pancreatic cancer: Current status and future directions

Despite advances in surgery and adjuvant therapy pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a dismal prognosis. Surgical resection with negative margins remains the mainstay of treatment, and results can be improved with neoadjuvant therapy when the lesion is of borderline resectability. Extended lymphadenectomy has no role in improving survival, but may worsen quality of life. Venous resection can be performed if it helps to achieve an R0 resection, but arterial resection is not justified. A host of newer agents, both cytotoxic and targeted, are being evaluated. The article summarizes the critical issues and looks ahead to the future.

Prognostic implications of tumor invasion or adhesion to peripancreatic vessels in resected pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the operative risk and the prognostic implications of pancreatectomy plus resection and reconstruction of peripancreatic vessels (PPV) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

One hundred ten patients who underwent pancreatectomy with PPV resection and reconstruction (Study Group; SG) were retrospectively compared with 62 patients without distant metastasis who were palliated, (Control Group 1; CG-1), as well as 197 patients who underwent "conventional"pancreatectomy (Control Group 2; CG-2).

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar in SG (33% and 3%), in CG-1 (26% and 3%), and in CG-2 (40% and 6%) patients. Median survival time (MST) of SG patients (15 months) was longer than that of CG-1 patients (6 months; P < .0001) and similar to that of CG-2 patients (18 months). Patients undergoing isolated venous resection (n = 84) had the best outcome (MST: 15 months) ( P < .0001 vs CG-1 patients), while patients undergoing resection of multiple PPV (n = 14) had the worst outcome (MST: 8 months). PPV infiltration, histologically proven in 64 patients (65%), was associated with decreased MST only if the tunica intima was infiltrated (26%) (11 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that no adjuvant therapy, intimal invasion, and poorly differentiated histology were associated with a higher hazard of death by 2.2, 2.2, and 2.5-fold, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In properly selected patients, pancreatectomy plus resection and reconstruction of PPV was performed as safely as palliation or "conventional" pancreatectomy and was associated with better survival when compared to palliation.

[Pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection: a new standard for tumors]

Traverso-Longmire pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection is regarded as the standard surgical procedure for pancreatic head tumors. The mortality, morbidity, and oncological radicality are as low as with the classic Kausch-Whipple resection, with the additional advantage of shorter operating time and reduced blood loss. Important for long-term survival is, however, not the resection of the stomach but the early diagnosis with subsequent R0 tumor resection. Patients can benefit fundamentally from this procedure if it is carried out at a specialized center.

Long-term outcomes of extended radical resection combined with intraoperative radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Systemic and/or local recurrence often occurs even after curative resection for pancreatic cancer (PC). To prevent local relapse we adopted an extended radical resection combined with intraoperative radiation therapy in patients with PC, and all the patients were followed for more than 5 years.

METHODS

We assessed the long-term outcomes of 41 patients who underwent this combined therapy. The cumulative survival curve in this series was depicted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The actual 5-year survival rate was 14.6%, with a median survival time of 17.6 months. Six patients have been 5-year survivors. Local recurrence occurred in only 2 patients (5.0%). Cancer-related death occurred in 32 patients, 18 of whom had liver metastases. The patients with liver metastases had a significantly shorter survival time than those with other cancer-related causes of death. Patients with n3 lymph node involvement, extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion, and stage IV disease had significantly poorer prognoses than patients without these characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our combined therapy for patients with PC contributed to local control; however, it provided no survival benefit, because of liver metastases.

The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

The role of lymph node (LN) dissection for pancreatic cancer remains uncertain, and guidelines for a minimum LN number have not been established. We hypothesized that LN number in node-negative (N0) pancreatic cancer influences survival.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients undergoing resection for N0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1988 and 2003. Lymph node number was categorized as 1-10, 11-20, and >20.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 1915 patients, the median LN number was 7 (range 1-57); 1365 (71%) patients had <11 LN. Survival was significantly better in the 11 to 20 compared with the 1-10 group (median, 20 vs 15 months, respectively, P < 0.0001); no difference was observed between the 11-20 and >20 groups (median, 20 vs 23 months, respectively, P = 0.14). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the prognostic significance of LN number for determining overall survival (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic cancer lymphadenectomy with examination of >10 LN is associated with improved survival in N0 disease and should be considered a benchmark for adequacy of surgery and/or pathology. Currently, only a minority of patients are assessed by this measure. The variation in LN number may be indicative of diverse surgical technique and/or pathologic analysis and warrants further investigation.

The role of extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: strength of the evidence

With improvements in the safety of Whipple resection in recent decades, surgeons have continued to explore the role of more extensive lymphadenectomy in hope of improving long-term survival. A systematic literature search of level I evidence addressing the role of the extent of lymphadenectomy was undertaken. Only reports of prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy with standard lymphadenectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy where information regarding survival, morbidity, mortality, the number of resected lymph nodes in each group and detailed operative technique were included. Four prospective, randomized trials comprising some 424 patients and one meta-analysis were identified. In aggregate, these studies confirmed that the number of resected lymph nodes was significantly higher in the pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy group. Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Postoperative diarrhea in the early months after operation was problematic in patients undergoing extended lymphadenectomy. In none of the studies was a benefit in long-term survival demonstrated. Standard pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to be the operation of choice for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Surgical management of carcinoma of the head of pancreas: extended lymphadenectomy or modified en bloc resection?

Pancreatoduodenectomy for the treatment of periampullary cancer was described over 70 years ago. The technique has evolved in an attempt to improve the dismal prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancers. Radical regional resection has been proposed to decrease the incidence of local recurrence as well as to improve survival. These extended resections have failed to show a significant survival benefit in prospective randomized controlled studies. Furthermore, extended pancreatic resections may be associated with increased morbidity. The concept of modified en bloc resection has been advocated and is soundly based on anatomical and pathological principals. This procedure is a modification of the radical regional resection previously described. It involves resection of the peripancreatic retroperitoneal tissue and lymph nodes en bloc with the head of pancreas, in order to achieve an R0 resection but without the morbidity associated with an extended lymphadenectomy. Conceptually, this procedure may be the most appropriate technique for the management of pancreatic head cancers although the ultimate effect on long-term survival can only be judged after further clinical studies.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma

Surgical resection provides the only chance for long-term survival for patients diagnosed with pancreatic and other associated periampullary adenocarcinomas. In the past, it had been suggested that the performance of an extended lymphadenectomy in association with a pancreaticoduodenal resection might have improved long-term survival for some patients. In response, six prospective trials have been performed and reported addressing this issue. These studies, including a large randomized trial of 280 patients from Johns Hopkins University, indicate that there is no demonstrable survival benefit to extended lymphadenectomy for periampullary cancer.

Large topographic variability of upper abdominal lymphatics and the consequences for radiation treatment planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Inclusion of regional lymph nodes usually is indicated when treating upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Lymphatics follow the large vessels of this region. Vascular variability with consequences for planning treatment volume (PTV) was studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Upper abdominal metric relationship of the vascular origins was analysed in CT scans in 104 patients to estimate its influence on PTV variability. PTV volumes were calculated based on these. Additionally, the PTV size of 3D plans of 34 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was analysed depending on different PTV definitions.

RESULTS

Vascular origin varied most for the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) with substantial PTV size differences. Volumetric variability was analysed for PDAC (IMA versus renal hilum as caudal margin). Additional PTV for IMA was < 100 cc (median) but ranged up to 350 cc in CT (100-199 ml in 14/34 and > 200 ml in 3/34 patients). Data from treatment planning confirmed this observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable vascular and lymphatic variability obliges to base PTV on the individual vascular anatomy. For most patients the caudal PTV margin for PDAC can safely be set at the IMA. But PTV should be restricted when the additional volume would lead to a significant increase to avoid haematotoxicity from concomitant gemcitabine which is proportional with PTV size. The risk of kidney toxicity is also subject to PTV expansion in the caudal direction.

Oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery

Despite the development of more sophisticated diagnostic techniques, pancreatic carcinoma has not yet been detected in the early stage. Surgical resection provides the only chance for cure or long-term survival. The resection rate has increased due to recent advances in surgical techniques and the application of extensive surgery. However, the postoperative prognosis has been poor due to commonly occurring liver metastasis, local recurrence and peritoneal dissemination. Recent molecular-biological studies have clarified occult metastasis, micrometastasis and systemic disease in pancreatic cancer. Several oncological problems in pancreatic cancer surgery are discussed in the present review.

A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare operative morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) versus pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1997 to July 2003 there were 132 patients with biopsy examination-proven or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who agreed to participate in a single-institution, prospective, randomized trial. If resectable at operation, patients then were randomized to standard PD (40 patients) or PD/ELND (39 patients). Quality of life was assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographics and pathologic characteristics for both groups were similar. When comparing PD/ELND with standard PD, the median operating time was greater for the PD/ELND group (7.6 h vs 6.2 h, P < .01), blood transfusion more likely (44% vs 22%, P < .05), and the median number of lymph nodes resected was greater (36 vs 15 nodes, P < .01). Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Median durations of stay were 11 and 10.5 days (P = NS), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year (71% vs 82%), 3-year (25% vs 41%), 5-year (16.5% vs 16.4%), and median (19 vs 26 mo) survival (P = .32). At 4 months postoperatively, diarrhea, body appearance, and bowel control scored lower on the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas after PD/ELND (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a much larger study would have more power to compare statistically the survival between groups, both the decrement in quality of life and similar studies showing no survival difference make PD/ELND unattractive for further prospective investigation.

A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare operative morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) versus pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PD/ELND) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From May 1997 to July 2003 there were 132 patients with biopsy examination-proven or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head who agreed to participate in a single-institution, prospective, randomized trial. If resectable at operation, patients then were randomized to standard PD (40 patients) or PD/ELND (39 patients). Quality of life was assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Demographics and pathologic characteristics for both groups were similar. When comparing PD/ELND with standard PD, the median operating time was greater for the PD/ELND group (7.6 h vs 6.2 h, P < .01), blood transfusion more likely (44% vs 22%, P < .05), and the median number of lymph nodes resected was greater (36 vs 15 nodes, P < .01). Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Median durations of stay were 11 and 10.5 days (P = NS), respectively. There were no significant differences in 1-year (71% vs 82%), 3-year (25% vs 41%), 5-year (16.5% vs 16.4%), and median (19 vs 26 mo) survival (P = .32). At 4 months postoperatively, diarrhea, body appearance, and bowel control scored lower on the Functional Assessment of Response to Cancer Therapy specific to the pancreas after PD/ELND (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a much larger study would have more power to compare statistically the survival between groups, both the decrement in quality of life and similar studies showing no survival difference make PD/ELND unattractive for further prospective investigation.

Peripyloric lymph node metastasis is a rare condition in carcinoma of the pancreatic head

OBJECTIVES

Pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) was introduced to achieve a better functional result compared with the conventional Kausch-Whipple procedure (PD). In PPPD, peripyloric and perigastric lymphatic tissue is not removed compared with PD. The aim of this prospective study was to identify the frequency of peripyloric and perigastric lymph node metastases in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PC).

METHODS

Fifty specimens following Kausch-Whipple procedure including partial gastric resection for PC were analyzed for peripyloric and perigastric lymph node metastases by a standardized clearing technique. All lymph nodes of the specimens were counted, discriminating between those not removed ("group A") and those removed ("group B") in pylorus preserving resection of the pancreatic head. Additionally, the duodenal wall and paraduodenal tissue at a potential duodenal resection margin 2 cm distal of the pylorus were investigated histologically.

RESULTS

Three of the 50 specimens (6%) carried peripyloric lymph node metastases, whereas 32 of the 50 specimens (64%) contained lymph node metastases in total. Four of 362 group A and 90 of 748 group B lymph nodes showed metastatic spread of the carcinoma. The 4 lymph node metastases in group A could be identified exclusively in 88 peripyloric lymph nodes but in none of the 274 perigastric lymph nodes at the lesser or greater curvature. In 2 of the 3 patients with peripyloric lymph node metastases, these lymph nodes were the only lymph nodes with metastatic involvement in the entire specimen. In 1 specimen, a small tumor nest of less than 2 mm in diameter was detected at a distance of less than 1 mm to the pylorus, although pyloric involvement was not suspected intraoperatively. The potential PPPD resection margin of the duodenal wall was not infiltrated by intramural tumor spread in any specimen.

CONCLUSION

In a minority of 6%, PC metastasizes in peripyloric lymph nodes. Lymph nodes of the lesser and greater curvature of the stomach are not involved in patients with PC. Thus, we conclude by the data of this prospective study that the limited benefits of the extended lymph node dissection in a conventional Kausch-Whipple resection are far outweighed by the disadvantages construed by this procedure.

The combination of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/Apo2L) and Genistein is effective in inhibiting pancreatic cancer growth

OBJECTIVES

Our previous studies have shown that, contrary to many other human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines, AsPC1 cells are resistant to the apoptotic effect of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, also called Apo2L (TRAIL/Apo2L). In our in vitro studies, the combination of TRAIL/Apo2L and protein synthesis inhibitor, genistein, but not genistein alone, was, however, effective in inducing apoptosis in AsPC1 cells. In the present study, we examined the effect of TRAIL/Apo2L with genistein on the growth of AsPC1 cells in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

Mice with orthotopically transplanted AsPC1 cells were treated either with TRAIL/Apo2L, Genistein (Gen) or a combination of both (TRAIL/Apo2L + Gen) for 14 days. After 14 days, the size and weight of the tumors were registered and the apoptosis of the tumor cells were determined by the TUNEL method. In vitro, the effect of combination treatment on cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay and apoptosis was assessed by DAPI staining. FADD, caspase 3, and PARP proteins were determined by Western blot.

RESULTS

No toxic side effects were observed in either group. The tumor volume was significantly smaller and the apoptotic ratio was higher in the TRAIL + Gen group than in the other 2 groups. The apoptotic effect was associated with the caspase-3 activation. Z-VAD-FMK partially inhibited apoptosis by TRAIL + Gen.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the combination of TRAIL/Apo2L with genistein presents a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Further detail investigations are needed, however, to verify the mechanisms of this combination therapy.

Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?

Surgery for pancreatic cancer offers a low success rate but it provides the only likelihood of cure. Modern series show that, in experienced hands, the standard Whipple procedure is associated with a 5-year survival of 10%-20%, with a perioperative mortality rate of less than 5%. Most patients, however, will develop recurrent disease within 2 years after curative treatment. This occurs, usually, either at the site of resection or in the liver. This suggests the presence of micrometastases at the time of operation. Negative lymph nodes are the strongest predictor for long-term survival. Other predictors for a favourable outcome are tumour size, radical surgery and a histopathologically well-differentiated tumour. Adjuvant therapy has, so far, shown only modest results, with 5FU chemotherapy, to date, the only proven agent able to increase survival. Nowadays, the choice of therapy should be based on histopathological assessment of the tumour. Knowledge of the molecular basis of pancreatic cancer has led to various discoveries concerning its character and type. Well-known examples of genetic mutations in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas are k-ras, p53, p16, DPC4. Use of molecular diagnostics and markers in the assessment of tumour biology may, in future, reveal important subtypes of this type of tumour and may possibly predict the response to adjuvant therapy. Defining the subtypes of pancreatic cancer will, hopefully, lead to target-specific, less toxic and finally more effective therapies. Long-term survival is observed in only a very small group of patients, contradicting the published actuarial survival rates of 10%-45%. Assessment of clinical benefit from surgery and adjuvant therapy should, therefore, not only be based on actuarial survival but also on progression-free survival, actual survival, median survival and quality of life (QOL) indicators. Survival in surgical series is usually calculated by actuarial methods. If there is no information on the total number of patients and the number of actual survivors, and no clear definition of the subset of patients, actuarial survival curves can prove to be misleading. Proper assessment of QOL after surgery and adjuvant therapy is of the utmost importance, as improvements in survival rates have, so far, proved to be disappointing.

Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background

Mortality rates associated with pancreatic resection for cancer have steadily decreased with time, but improvements in long-term survival are less clear. This prospective study evaluated risk factors for survival after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Data from 366 consecutive patients recorded prospectively between November 1993 and September 2001 were analysed using univariate and multivariate models.

Results

Fifty-eight patients (15·8 per cent) underwent surgical exploration only, 97 patients (26·5 per cent) underwent palliative bypass surgery and 211 patients (57·7 per cent) resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Stage I disease was present in 9·0 per cent, stage II in 18·0 per cent, stage III in 68·7 per cent and stage IV in 4·3 per cent of patients who underwent resection. Resection was curative (R0) in 75·8 per cent of patients. Procedures included pylorus-preserving Whipple resection (41·2 per cent), classical Whipple resection (37·0 per cent), left pancreatic resection (13·7 per cent) and total pancreatectomy (8·1 per cent). The in-hospital mortality and cumulative morbidity rates were 2·8 and 44·1 per cent respectively. The overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 19·8 per cent after resection. Survival was better after curative resection (R0) (24·2 per cent) and in lymph-node negative patients (31·6 per cent). A Cox proportional hazards survival analysis indicated that curative resection was the most powerful independent predictor of long-term survival.

Conclusion

Resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be performed safely. The overall survival rate is determined by the radicality of resection. Patients deemed fit for surgery who have no radiological signs of distant metastasis should undergo surgical exploration. Resection should follow if there is a reasonable likelihood that an R0 resection can be obtained.

CT and pathologic assessment of prospective nodal staging in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare the assessment of peripancreatic lymph nodes using CT with the gold standard of detailed histopathologic assessment of resected specimens in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with presumed pancreatic carcinoma were prospectively studied with dual-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT, and images were interpreted in consensus by three radiologists. Complete surgical resection was performed in 28 patients. A detailed nodal classification system was used for radiologic, surgical, and pathologic staging in the nine patients whose final diagnosis at histology was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Forty lymph nodes were prospectively identified on CT in these nine patients. Two of 23 nodes (9%) measuring less than 5 mm in the short-axis diameter were malignant, four of 11 nodes (36%) measuring 5-10 mm were malignant, and one of six nodes (17%) larger than 10 mm was malignant. Using a short-axis diameter of greater than 10 mm as the criterion for nodal involvement, we found a sensitivity of 14% (1/7) and a specificity of 85% (28/33), with a positive predictive value of 17% (1/6), a negative predictive value of 82% (28/34), and an overall accuracy of 73% (29/40). Ovoid nodal shape, clustering of nodes, and the absence of a fatty hilum were not useful predictors of malignancy on CT.

CONCLUSION

In resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, CT is not accurate overall for the prediction of nodal involvement. In a patient with presumed pancreatic carcinoma that is considered to be resectable, the depiction on CT of peripancreatic nodes should not prevent attempted curative resection.

Hereditary pancreatic cancer

Hereditary pancreatic cancer (PC) appears to be exceedingly heterogeneous, as evidenced by its association with a variety of integrally associated diverse cancers and/or differing mendelian inherited cancer syndromes, which include the Lynch syndrome II variant of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome in families with the BRCA2 mutation, hereditary pancreatitis, Peutz-Jeghers polyposis and the familial atypical multiple-mole melanoma syndrome in families with the CDKN2A (p16) germline mutation. Because of this heterogeneity, we provide a conservative estimate that about 5% (1,460) of PC cases in the US annually are hereditary. Although this number is relatively small, members of hereditary PC families serve as excellent models for studying the etiology, natural history, biomarkers, pathogenesis, potential carcinogenic exposures and their perturbation of underlying genetic events, and treatment of PC. These individuals would benefit greatly from method(s) capable of detecting cancer at an early stage, and such knowledge would also be useful for improving the diagnosis of the much more common 'sporadic' form of PC.

Pancreatic cell lines: a review

Pancreatic cancer has an extremely poor prognosis and lacks early diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities, mainly because of its silent course and explosive fatal outcome. The histogenesis of the disease and early biochemical and genetic alterations surrounding carcinogenesis are still controversial. In vitro studies offer a useful tool to study physiologic, pathophysiologic, differentiation, and transformation processes of cells and to understand some of these shortcomings. The extreme difficulties in isolating individual pancreatic cells and their purification by maintaining their native characteristics have limited research in this area. This review is intended to present and discuss the current availability of rodent and pancreatic cell lines, their differences as well as the difficulties, limitations, and characteristics of these cultured cells. Discussed are in vitro models; ductal, islet, and acinar cell culture; cell differentiation; cell transformation, including genetic and chromosomal alterations; as well as tumor cell markers. Also addressed are the advantages and problems associated with the cell culture in humans and rodents. Advancements in tissue culture technique and molecular biology offer steady progress in this important line of research. The improved methods not only promise the establishment of beta-cell cultures for the treatment of diabetes, but also for studying sequential genetic alterations during pancreatic carcinogenesis and in understanding the tumor cell origin.

[Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: does pylorus preservation change morbidity and prognosis?]

STUDY AIM

To evaluate the influence of a pylorus-preserving on the morbidity and prognosis of patient with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of pancreas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1985 and 1999, 183 patients were operated on for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Among them, 63 patients (40 men, mean age 63 years, range 41-77 years) had curative resection and were included in this retrospective study. They were classified according to the type of resection. In the group I, the procedure included a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 35). In the group II, the procedure included polar inferior gastrectomy (n = 28). The prognosis was compared. Parameters for comparison were rate of local recurrence, rate of metastatic evolution and duration of survival.

RESULTS

The operative length and mortality rate (group I: 0%, group II: 3%), general (p = 0.37) and specific morbidity (p = 0.30), frequency of delayed gastric emptying were similar in the 2 groups (group I: 20%, group II: 35%, p = 0.88). The duration of naso-gastic aspiration was shorter in the group I (6 days vs 8, p = 0.01). The prognosis was the same in the 2 groups (metastasis: group I: 39%, group II: 56%, p = 0.12, local recurrence: group I: 58%, group II: 43%, p = 0.09, mean survival: group I: 18 months, group II: 19 months, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy could be performed for patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and does not compromise survival.