Chemotherapy and radiation therapy for anal carcinoma. Survival and late morbidity

Systematic review of survival following liver or lung metastasectomy for metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) carries a poor prognosis and the evidence base for surgical resection of metastases remains limited. The aim of this study was to establish the survival outcomes for patients undergoing metastasectomy for anal SCC.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE®, Embase®, Cochrane and PubMed® databases. Studies were considered for inclusion in the review if they involved patients aged >18 years with a diagnosis of stage IV anal SCC who underwent metastasectomy for liver and/or lung metastases. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Secondary outcome measures were disease free survival, early morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and quality of life, measured using a validated scoring tool. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool.

RESULTS

There were 10 studies with a total of 98 patients. There was heterogeneity in results reporting, with recurrence free survival the most reported outcome. For all studies reporting on liver metastasectomy, the one-year overall survival rate was 87%. In studies with adequate follow-up reported, the three and five-year overall survival rates were 53% and 38% respectively. Only one study reported on lung metastasectomy patients; the overall median survival was 24 months. None of the studies reported on quality of life measures. The ROBINS-I tool identified a critical risk of bias in six studies, a serious risk in one study and a moderate risk in three studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence base for metastasectomy in metastatic anal SCC is limited. Further information is required to inform future treatment methods and use of a standardised outcomes reporting method is needed to support this.

Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of data on incidence and mechanisms of long-term gastrointestinal consequences after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. Most of the adverse effects reported were based on traditional external beam radiotherapy whilst only short-term follow-ups have been available for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and there is lack of knowledge about consequences of dose-escalation radiotherapy.

METHOD

A systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and eighty-five titles (excluding duplicates) were identified through the search; 130 articles were included in this review. The overall incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity was reported to be 7-64.5%, with Grade 3 and above (classified as severe) up to 33.3%. The most commonly reported late toxicities were fecal incontinence (up to 44%), diarrhea (up to 26.7%), and ulceration (up to 22.6%). Diarrhea, fecal incontinence and buttock pain were associated with lower scores in radiotherapy specific quality of life scales (QLQ-CR29, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-CR38) compared to healthy controls. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy appears to reduce late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Late gastrointestinal toxicities are common with severe toxicity seen in one-third of the patients. These symptoms significantly impact on patients' quality of life. Prospective studies with control groups are needed to elucidate long-term toxicity.

Radio-Chemotherapy of Anal Cancer

Conventional treatment of anal cancer has been the demolitive Miles operation for decades. Radiotherapy has been utilized in a limited number of centers for early cancers only. Radio-chemotherapy has become the treatment of choice for all stages of anal cancer after the first experiences by the group of Detroit and after the confirmation of successful results by many other centers. Infusional chemotherapy (5-FU and Mitomycin C or CDDP) and concurrent irradiation are able to achieve local control in more than 80% of patients. Surgery currently represents a rescue treatment for partial responders or in relapsing patients. A brief review of the literature and the experience at the Istituto Tumori in Milano are presented.

Salvage Surgery for Locoregional Failure in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare cancer with a high cure rate, making research into the treatment of locoregional failure difficult.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine factors related to local treatment failure and determine the outcomes of patients undergoing local salvage resection.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a quaternary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy between January 1983 and December 2015 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The influence of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors on the primary outcome measures of locoregional failure, overall survival, and disease-free survival were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 467 patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma, 63 experienced locoregional failure with 41 undergoing salvage resection. Twenty-seven patients (38%) had persistent disease and 36 (62%) developed locoregional recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified tumor stage (HR, 3.16; p < 0.002) as an independent predictor of locoregional failure. Thirty abdominoperineal resections and 11 pelvic exenterations were undertaken with no surgical mortality. At a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 4-150 months), 5-year overall and disease-free survival for the salvage cohort was 51% and 47%. Margin positivity was an independent predictor for relapse post-salvage surgery on multivariate analysis (HR, 20.1; p = 0.027). Nineteen patients (48%) developed further relapse, which included all 10 patients with a positive resection margin, 3 of whom underwent re-resection. Of the 19 patients with relapse, 3 remain alive and 2 have persistent disease.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the retrospective nature of the database, the prolonged time period of the study, and episodes of incomplete data.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced T stage is an independent predictor of local failure in anal squamous cell carcinoma. Most patients can be salvaged, with a positive resection margin being a strong predictor of further relapse and poor outcome. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A515.

Long term outcome after resection of liver metastases from squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) liver metastases still remains a difficult challenge and the effectiveness of resection for SCC liver metastases is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term outcomes of surgically treated patients with SCC liver metastases.

METHODS

The clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS) of all patients with SCC liver metastases resected between 1998 and 2015, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 28 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 19 patients with anal cancer metastases (68%), 2 (7%) with cervix cancer metastases, 2 (7%) with tonsil cancer metastases, 2 (7%) with lung cancer metastases, 2 (7%) with primary unknown cancer metastases and 1 (4%) with vulvar cancer metastases. Four (14%) patients underwent major hepatectomy. There were no liver insufficiency cases or 90-day mortality. Cumulative 3- and 5-year OS rates were 52% and 47%. Cumulative 1- and 3-year RFS rates were 50% and 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes after resection of SCC liver metastases compare favorably with those of colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases. Liver resection can be an effective treatment option for SCC liver metastases in appropriately selected patients after systemic therapy.

Successful hepatectomy for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal-a case report

Despite rare, metastatic anal carcinoma confers a poor prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced disease while the role of biologics and/or surgical resection of metastatic disease are anecdotal. Compared to isolated liver colorectal or neuroendocrine cancer liver metastases, there is far less experience with resection or nonsurgical local ablative procedures for patients with metastatic anal carcinoma to the liver. We report the case of a 67-year-old woman with metastatic anal carcinoma to the liver who was successfully treated with liver resection and remains free of relapse more than one year later.

Investigational drugs for treating anal cancer and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Anal cancer is a relatively rare malignancy which comprises about 2.5% of all digestive system malignancies in the United States. The majority of cases are squamous cell carcinoma which is closely related to human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Despite high cure rates with chemoradiation alone, 10 - 20% of patients do develop metastatic disease with little data to guide their treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this review article, the authors describe the current standard treatment of early and advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal based on published data. The authors then describe the new approaches to the disease, focusing on new radio sensitizing agents, systemic targeted drugs and immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors believe that current standard treatment options for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal are well defined with acceptable results. However the major challenge in the treatment of anal cancer is the lack of randomized or even large single arm Phase II trials due to rarity of the disease, especially in the metastatic disease. But we are slowly making progress. Currently, the most promising areas of research are immunotherapy, targeted therapy and even HPV prevention. We are eagerly anticipating the results of these studies in order to expand the treatment armamentarium.

"Mind the gap"--the impact of variations in the duration of the treatment gap and overall treatment time in the first UK Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)

PURPOSE

The United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research anal cancer trial demonstrated the benefit of combined modality treatment (CMT) using radiotherapy (RT), infusional 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin C over RT alone. The present study retrospectively examines the impact of the recommended 6-week treatment gap and local RT boost on long-term outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 577 patients were randomly assigned RT alone or CMT. After a 6-week gap responders received a boost using either additional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (15 Gy) or iridium-192 implant (25 Gy). The effect of boost, the gap between initial treatment (RT alone or CMT) and boost (Tgap), and overall treatment time (OTT) were examined for their impact on outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 490 good responders, 436 (89%) patients received a boost after initial treatment. For boosted patients, the risk of anal cancer death decreased by 38% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 99% CI 0.35-1.12; p=0.04), but there was no evidence this was mediated via a reduction in locoregional failure (LRF) (HR: 0.90, 99% CI 0.48-1.68; p=0.66). The difference in Tgap was only 1.4 days longer for EBRT boost, compared with implant (p=0.51). OTT was longer by 6.1 days for EBRT (p=0.006). Tgap and OTT were not associated with LRF. Radionecrosis was reported in 8% of boosted, compared with 0% in unboosted patients (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These results question the benefit of a radiotherapy boost after a 6-week gap. The higher doses of a boost may contribute more to an increased risk of late morbidity, rather than local control.

Quality of life and tumor control after short split-course chemoradiation for anal canal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and outcome of patients with anal carcinoma treated with short split-course chemoradiation (CRT).

METHODS

From 1991 to 2005, 58 patients with anal cancer were curatively treated with CRT. External beam radiotherapy (52 Gy/26 fractions) with elective groin irradiation (24 Gy) was applied in 2 series divided by a median gap of 12 days. Chemotherapy including fluorouracil and Mitomycin-C was delivered in two sequences. Long-term QOL was assessed using the site-specific EORTC QLQ-CR29 and the global QLQ-C30 questionnaires.

RESULTS

Five-year local control, colostomy-free survival, and overall survival were 78%, 94% and 80%, respectively. The global QOL score according to the QLQ-C30 was good with 70 out of 100. The QLQ-CR29 questionnaire revealed that 77% of patients were mostly satisfied with their body image. Significant anal pain or fecal incontinence was infrequently reported. Skin toxicity grade 3 or 4 was present in 76% of patients and erectile dysfunction was reported in 100% of male patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Short split-course CRT for anal carcinoma seems to be associated with good local control, survival and long-term global QOL. However, it is also associated with severe acute skin toxicity and sexual dysfunction. Implementation of modern techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) might be considered to reduce toxicity.

Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature

Background

The split-course schedule of chemo-radiation for anal cancer is controversial.

Methods

Eighty-four patients with invasive anal cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (RT) with a mandatory split of 12 days (52 patients, Montreal, Canada) or without an intended split (32 patients, Zurich, Switzerland) were reviewed. Total RT doses were 52 Gy (Montreal) or 59.4 Gy (Zurich) given concurrently with 5-FU/MMC.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 40 ± 27 months, overall survival and local tumor control at 5 years were 57% and 78% (Zurich) compared to 67% and 82% (Montreal), respectively. Split duration of patients with or without local relapse was 15 ± 7 d vs. 14 ± 7 d (Montreal, NS) and 11 ± 11 d vs. 5 ± 7 d (Zurich; P < 0.001). Patients from Zurich with prolonged treatment interruption (≥ 7 d) had impaired cancer-specific survival compared with patients with only minor interruption (<7 d) (P = 0.06). Bowel toxicity was associated with prolonged RT (P = 0.03) duration as well as increased relapse probability (P = 0.05). Skin toxicity correlated with institution and was found in 79% (Montreal) and 28% (Zurich) (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The study design did not allow demonstrating a clear difference in efficacy between the treatment regimens with or without short mandatory split. Cause-specific outcome appears to be impaired by unplanned prolonged interruption.

Review of 120 anal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for the majority of patients with anal cancer, with abdominoperineal resection reserved for salvage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our results after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, and/or surgery in terms of overall survival and colostomy free survival in patients with anal cancer.

METHOD

A review of patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 1991 and 2004 was performed. The principle end-points of the study were overall and colostomy-free survival.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients were identified. The T stage distribution was T1 32, T2 44, T3 19, T4 17 and TX 8. Eighteen patients had clinically involved regional nodes. Eighty patients received radiotherapy as a component of their treatment. Twenty-four of the 80 patients had a colostomy. The most common late toxicity was faecal incontinence. The overall survival and colostomy-free survival rates for all 120 patients were 58% and 79% at 5 years, respectively. For the 80 patients who received radiotherapy, the corresponding figures were 66% and 82% at 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiation is effective organ preserving treatment for anal cancer. Grade 1 and 2 faecal incontinence is a relatively common late toxicity experienced by patients.

Anal carcinoma in mid-Norway 1970-2000

The treatment of anal carcinoma changed from surgery to chemoradiotherapy 20-25 years ago. The aim of this observational study was to compare surgery with chemoradiotherapy with regard to side effects, local recurrence and survival during and after the implementation of a new treatment policy for anal carcinoma. The study includes all 111 patients with anal carcinoma diagnosed between 1970 and 2000 in mid-Norway. One hundred patients were treated with the intention to cure, and 11 patients received palliative treatment. Thirty-four patients were treated with surgery alone, and 57 patients with chemoradiotherapy. Among patients treated for cure, 17 patients (17%) developed local recurrence; ten patients (33%) in the surgically treated group and 4 (7%) in the chemoradiotherapy group (p = 0.15). Five year overall survival was 48% after surgery, compared to 78% after chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.004). Stage, age and treatment were all significant indicators of survival in uni- and multivariable analysis. Late side effects were moderate after combined therapy; only one patient preferred getting a stoma due to radiation damage of the anal sphincter. The change of strategy for anal cancer treatment from surgery to combined therapy has probably reduced local recurrence and improved survival. Side effects in this series of patients were minor after chemoradiotherapy compared to a permanent stoma after surgery.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of anal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (RT; IMRT) can reduce dose to normal tissues (organs at risk) while maintaining equivalent target coverage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 9-field, non-coplanar, 1-cm beamlet IMRT plan was designed for 9 patients who were previously treated for anal cancer with conventional field arrangements. Clinical target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were defined. Target coverage was assigned highest priority for optimization, followed sequentially by organ at risk. The genitalia and perineal skin were the highest priority OARs. Lexicographic ordering-based IMRT optimization was used to generate a conformal plan, which was compared with the conventional, previously delivered RT plan.

RESULTS

The IMRT and conventional RT plan achieved homogeneous dose coverage of all target volumes. Intensity-modulated RT produced highly conformal dose distributions compared with conventional techniques, with avoidance of critical normal structures. Statistically significant reductions in mean doses to the perineal skin and to the genitalia were seen with IMRT, with only a modest increase in mean dose to the bony pelvis.

CONCLUSION

Intensity-modulated RT, with lexicographic ordering, allows for substantial reduction of dose to OARs while maintaining adequate target coverage. These encouraging findings might translate into reductions of treatment-related toxicity, gains in local control, or improvements in quality of life.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal

AIM

Although 15-25% of patients with anal cancer present with superficial inguinal lymph node metastases but the routine application of groin irradiation is controversial because of serious side effects. Inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be used to select patients appropriately for inguinal radiation. The study evaluates the efficiency and clinical impact of SLNB.

METHODS

Forty patients with anal cancer underwent 1 ml Tc(99m)-Nanocolloid injection in four sites around the tumour. Patients with inguinal radio colloid enrichment were selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Lymph node status was examined by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as immunohistochemistry-staining. All SLN-positive patients were scheduled for inguinal radiation; SLN-negative patients with T1 and early T2 tumours were not scheduled for inguinal radiation.

RESULTS

SLN were detected in 36/40 patients. Three common patterns of lymphatic drainage were observed: mesenterial, iliacal and inguinal. Twenty patients with inguinal SLN underwent SLN-biopsy. 6/20 patients were SLN-positive. In 10/20 patients SLNB altered the therapy plan--four patients with T1-tumours and positive SLN had additional groin irradiation, whereas 6 patients with small T2-tumors and tumour-free inguinal SLN did not undergo inguinal irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Inguinal sentinel node biopsy in anal cancer is efficient and could assist in the decision for inguinal radiation. The validity and safety of the proposed therapeutic algorithm has to be proven by a larger, prospective study.

Faecal incontinence in male patients

OBJECTIVE

Data concerning faecal incontinence (FI) in men are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the historical aetiology and contrast aetiologies in younger and older men suffering from FI.

METHOD

After institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients with FI seen between 1999 and 2005. The data of male patients was further analysed to assess the impact of age and historical aetiology on FI.

RESULTS

A total of 404 males were included, 203 patients were <70 years of age (group A) and 201 patients were >or=70 years of age (group B). The most common prior diagnosis in group A was perianal sepsis in 23 (11.3%) patients and symptomatic haemorrhoids in 20 (9.9%) patients; in group B it was prostate cancer in 57 (28.4%) patients, symptomatic haemorrhoids in 31 (15.4%) patients and neurological diseases in 18 (9%) patients. The most common prior procedure in group A was restorative proctectomy/proctocolectomy in 32 (15.8%) patients, fistulotomy or haemorrhoidectomy in 21 (10.3%) and 19 (9.4%) patients respectively. In group B, radiation therapy for prostate cancer was utilized in 48 (23.9%) patients and haemorrhoidectomy in 29 (14.4%) patients. Comparing group A and group B relative to diagnosis - perianal sepsis, perineal trauma, congenital disorders, HIV infection and anal cancer were more common in group A, whereas prostate cancer, neurological diseases and colon cancer were significantly more common in group B.

CONCLUSION

Prostate cancer, symptomatic haemorrhoids, perianal sepsis, rectal cancer and a history of restorative rectal resection were common associations with FI in men. The aetiologies for FI in men vary with age.

Anal canal carcinoma: experience from a single Korean institution

PURPOSE

The clinical features, treatment modality approaches in clinical practice, and prognostic factors for anal canal carcinoma patients were retrospectively analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 1994 and December 2005, 50 patients with anal canal cancer were treated at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

RESULTS

After a median follow up of 37.8 months (range, 6.6-136.1 months), the 5-year and 10-year survival rates for the 38 patients with early and locally advanced squamous and cloacogenic carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma and cloacogenic carcinoma) were 74.8% and 66.5%, respectively. The 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates (DFS) of the 31 patients who received chemoradiation therapy (CRT) were 83.6% and 74.3%, respectively. The overall and DFS could not be determined for the adenocarcinoma group due to the small number of cases (n=8). Univariate analysis showed that tumor size (p=0.04) and inguinal node status (p=0.04) significantly influenced patient survival in patients with squamous cell and cloacogenic carcinomas. Furthermore, univariate analysis also showed that, inguinal node status influenced patient survival in the adenocarcinoma group. Multivariate analysis showed that inguinal node metastasis is a single independent prognostic variable for survival (p=0.04) in patients with squamous cell and cloacogenic carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Combined CRT has been adopted as standard treatment with outcomes that are comparable to those reported in randomized clinical trials. Due to the rarity and complexity of anal canal carcinoma, interdepartmental cooperation is required for disease treatment. Thus, proper treatment of patients should incorporate a team-approach and should be available to as many patients as possible.

Involved-field, low-dose chemoradiotherapy for early-stage anal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To report the results of patients with early-stage anal cancer treated using a low-dose, reduced-volume, involved-field chemoradiotherapy protocol.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 2000 and June 2006, 21 patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions within 3 weeks) and concurrent chemotherapy (bolus mitomycin-C 12 mg/m(2) on Day 1 to a maximum of 20 mg followed by infusion 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2)/24 h on Days 1-4). Of the 21 patients, 18 underwent small-volume, involved-field radiotherapy and 3 were treated with anteroposterior-posteroanterior parallel-opposed pelvic fields. Of the 21 patients, 17 had had lesions that were excised with close (<1 mm) or involved margins, 1 had had microinvasive disease on biopsy, and 3 had had macroscopic tumor <2 cm in diameter (T1). All were considered to have Stage N0 disease radiologically.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 42 months, only 1 patient (4.7%) had experienced local recurrence and has remained disease free after local excision. No distant recurrences or deaths occurred. Only 1 patient could not complete treatment (because of Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in only 2 patients (9.5%). No significant late toxicity was identified.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that for patients with anal carcinoma who have residual microscopic or very-small-volume disease, a policy of low-dose, reduced-volume, involved-field chemoradiotherapy produces excellent local control and disease-free survival, with low rates of acute and late toxicity.

Outcomes of salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal

BACKGROUND

For patients with anal canal cancer who fail combined modality treatment (CMT), salvage surgery (SS) offers the potential for long term survival. The literature regarding SS is limited by small patient numbers and/or heterogeneous treatment protocols. We report on a large series of patients initially treated with chemoradiation at a major referral center.

METHODS

We identified 60 patients with persistent or recurrent anal cancer who had undergone SS; 20 were excluded. Overall and disease-free survival (OS, DFS) curves were constructed using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate analysis was done using the Log-Rank test, and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

The 40 patients (29 women, 11 men, median age 57) underwent curative intent resection. The initial procedure was multivisceral resection (n = 24), abdominoperineal resection alone (n = 14) or local excision (n = 2). Postoperative mortality was 5%. Postoperative complications were seen in 72%. Median follow-up was 18 months overall and 36 months in survivors. Median OS was 41 months; OS and disease free survival at 5 years were 39% and 30%, respectively. Recurrence was present in 21 patients at time of analysis. Failure was locoregional in 86% (18 of 21) and distant in 48% (10 of 21). Independent predictors of poor OS were male gender, Charlson Comorbidity Score and tumor size. Independent predictors of poor disease free survival were positive margins and lymphovascular invasion.

CONCLUSION

SS for anal canal cancer was associated with significant morbidity. Long-term survival was achieved in 39% of patients. Comorbidities should guide patient selection, and R0 resection should be the goal.

Liver-Directed Surgery for Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma to the Liver: Results of a Multi-Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of hepatic resection for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains unknown. The current study evaluates the role of hepatic resection in patients with metastatic SCC to the liver.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2006, 52 patients underwent hepatic resection of metastatic SCC at eight major cancer centers. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed with regard to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Primary SCC site was anal (n = 27), head/neck (n = 12), lung (n = 4), esophagus (n = 2), and other (n = 7). Treatment of primary SCC was chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy alone (n = 29), chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy + surgery (n = 15), or surgery alone (n = 8). Forty-seven patients underwent resection alone, 2 resection + radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 3 RFA only. At last follow-up, 33 (63.5%) patients had recurred. The median time to recurrence was 9.8 months, and 5-year DFS was 18.6%. Factors associated with reduced DFS were liver tumor size > 5 cm (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.02) and positive surgical margin (HR = 2.33). The overall median survival after hepatic resection was 22.3 months and 5-year actuarial OS was 20.5%. Risk factors associated with worse overall survival included synchronous disease (HR = 4.09), hepatic metastasis > 5 cm (HR = 1.71) and positive surgical resection margin (HR = 1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients will recur following hepatic resection of SCC. Long-term survival, however, can be achieved following surgical resection of SCC liver metastasis, especially in patients who present with limited metachronous disease amenable to margin negative resection.

Bilan préthérapeutique initial du carcinome épidermoïde invasif de l’anus

Anal epidermoid carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor, comprising less than 5% of all carcinomas of the colon, rectum, and anus. The primary therapy now includes radiotherapy, often in combination with chemotherapy. Radical surgery is now rarely indicated. Therapeutic indications are based on locoregional staging, the presence of visceral metastases and an evaluation of the medical history. Anorectal endosonography is helpful in evaluating locoregional extension. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography scanning and inguinal sentinel lymph node procedure should play a role in a more selective approach in patients with anal carcinoma.

[Epidermoid carcinomas of anal canal treated with radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin)]

PURPOSE

To evaluate our results after radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy in terms of local control, survival and toxicity in patients with anal cancer.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Between November 1990 and January 2002, 60 patients (pts) were treated with radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy. The T-stage according to the 2001 UICC classification were: 2 T1, 26 T2, 25 T3, and 7 T4. There were 20 pts with nodal involvement at presentation. The treatment started with external beam RT (median dose: 45 Gy) and concomitant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin during the first week and the fifth week of external beam RT (EBRT). After a rest period of 4 to 6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 58 pts and by interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy in 2 pts. Mean follow-up were 78.5 months.

RESULTS

At the end of RT with concomitant chemotherapy local tumor clinical complete response rate was 83%. Out of 10 non responders or local progression, 5 (50%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection (APR). Out of 5 local tumor relapses, 3 were salvaged with APR. The overall local tumor control (LC) rate with or without salvage local treatment were 88%. LC rate with a good anal function scoring (score 0 and 1) was 70%. Among 43 pts who preserved their anus, 98% had a good anal function scoring. The 5-year disease-free survival was 75%. After multivariate analysis, 2 independent predicting factors significantly influenced the disease-free survival: HIV-positive pts (negative vs positive, P=0.032) and clinical tumor response after the first course of radiotherapy (<50% vs >or=50%, P=0.00032). Acute grade 2 or 3 toxicities were low: haematological toxicity in 4 pts and intestinal complication corresponding to diarrhea in 10 pts. Late severe complication was observed in 3 pts: 2 pts with painful necrosis of the anus requiring colostomy and 1 pt with grade 3 rectal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

We confirm the good results with RT and concomitant chemotherapy. The clinical tumor response after the first course of RT and concomitant chemotherapy is probably the most important predictive factor on the disease-free survival. For patients with T3 or T4 lesion and tumor regression <or=50% after the first course of radiation therapy, surgical non conservative treatment should be discussed.

Faecal incontinence: A late side-effect of pelvic radiotherapy

AIMS

Despite advances in pelvic radiotherapy, damage to normal tissue can lead to chronic gastrointestinal problems. The frequency with which this affects quality of life is controversial. Faecal incontinence is not widely perceived to be a major issue after pelvic radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to review the frequency and mechanisms for the development of faecal incontinence after pelvic radiotherapy, and to review treatment options for faecally incontinent patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of original literature was carried out using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1966 to 2005.

RESULTS

The reliability of the published data is poor because patients frequently fail to admit to faecal incontinence, and because prospective studies are lacking that assess faecal incontinence as a specific end point using adequate, validated and reproducible methodology. The published rates of late new-onset faecal incontinence after pelvic radiation are between 3% and 53%. Patients treated for prostate rather than gynaecological, bladder, rectal or anal cancer may have a lower rate. Only 8-56% of affected patients state that faecal incontinence reduces their quality of life. Studies examining the physiological changes occurring after radiotherapy are generally not adequately controlled or powered, assessment of ano-rectal function is rarely comprehensive and loss of patients to follow-up frequently makes it difficult to extrapolate results to a wider population. Where there is agreement over the physiological changes that occur after radiotherapy, it is not clear at what threshold these changes cause symptoms. No prospective studies of any non-surgical treatment for faecal incontinence after radiotherapy have been published. Surgery other than colostomy probably carries a high risk of complications in this group of patients, but few data have been published.

CONCLUSIONS

Now that improvements in outcome from combination treatments, including radiotherapy for pelvic cancer, are being achieved, it is time that serious attention is paid to determining how frequently significant gastrointestinal toxicity arises, and how best to optimise the quality of life of long-term survivors.

Prognostic value of tumor regression evaluated after first course of radiotherapy for anal canal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the tumor response after an initial course of irradiation predicts for colostomy-free survival and overall survival in patients with anal canal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1980 and 1998, 252 patients were treated by pelvic external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost in 218 or EBRT in 34. EBRT was combined with chemotherapy in 168 patients. An evaluation of tumor regression, before the boost, was available for 221 patients. They were divided into four groups according to the tumor response: <70%, 70-80%, >80% but <100%, and 100%.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 58 months. The overall survival rate was 72.6% +/- 3.1% and 57.3% +/- 4.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The disease-free survival rate was 60.0% +/- 3.3% and 49.4% +/- 3.9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The colostomy-free survival rate was 61% at 5 years and 47% at 10 years. Two groups could be differentiated according to the percentage of tumor regression before the boost: >80% vs. < or = 80%. The group with a T3-T4 lesion and tumor regression < or = 80% had the poorest overall (52.8% +/- 12.3%), disease-free (19.9% +/- 9.9%), and colostomy-free survival (24.8% +/- 11.2%) rates.

CONCLUSION

The amount of tumor regression before EBRT or brachytherapy boost is a strong prognostic factor of disease control without colostomy. When regression is < or = 80% in patients with an initial T3-T4 lesion, the use of conservative RT should be carefully evaluated because of the very poor disease-free and colostomy-free survival.

Management of anal canal cancer

PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy has replaced radical surgery as the initial treatment of choice for anal canal cancer. The roles of these therapeutic modalities are discussed and recommendations on management of anal canal cancer are made based on currently available evidence. Areas for further studies also are identified.

METHODS

Literature on management of anal canal cancer from January 1970 to July 2003 obtained via MEDLINE was reviewed. Reports on anal margin cancers were excluded.

RESULTS

Randomized, prospective, Phase 3 trials in Europe and the United States showed that chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C was superior in local control, colostomy-free rate, progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival compared with radiation alone. In larger tumors, the addition of mitomycin C to radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil improves local control, colostomy-free, and disease-free survival but is associated with more acute hematologic toxicity. Chemoradiotherapy, including Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, appeared to be equal or superior to surgery as salvage therapy in patients with residual disease six weeks after initial nonsurgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve treatment outcomes and reduce treatment-related toxicities, further studies are required to elucidate the optimal drug combination and doses, optimal radiation field, total dose, and fraction sizes. Randomized, multicenter trials are needed to define the treatment protocol that provides the highest rate of sphincter preservation with acceptable toxicity. Few studies addressed the treatment of metastatic disease, which remains a major cause of mortality.

Radiochemotherapy in the conservative treatment of anal canal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of results and radiation dose effectiveness

PURPOSE

This retrospective analysis reports the results on patients with anal canal carcinoma treated by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 1993 and December 2001, 43 patients with anal canal carcinoma were treated with radiochemotherapy at the Hospital do Cancer A.C. Camargo. Stage distribution was as follows: I, 3 (7%); II, 23 (53.5%); IIIA, 8 (18.6%); and IIIB, 9 (21%). The median age was 56 years (range, 36-77 years) with most patients being women (4:1). External radiotherapy (RT) was delivered at the whole pelvis followed by a boost at the primary tumor. The median dose of RT at the whole pelvis and at the primary tumor was 45 Gy and 55 Gy, respectively. Chemotherapy was carried out during the first and last 4 days of RT with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)) and bolus mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2)). Median overall treatment time was 51 days (range, 30-129 days). Thirty-four patients (79%) did not receive elective RT at the inguinal region. Patient's age, tumor stage, overall treatment time, and RT dose at primary tumor were variables analyzed for survival and local control.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 4-116 months). Overall survival and colostomy-free survival at 5 years was 68% and 52%, respectively. Overall survival according to clinical stage was as follows: I, 100%; II, 82%; IIIA, 73%; and IIIB, 18% (p = 0.0049). Complete response was observed in 40 patients (93%). Local recurrence occurred in 9 (21%) patients, and of these, 6 were rescued by surgery. Local control with a preserved sphincter was observed in 34 patients (79%). According to the RT dose, local control was higher among patients who received more than 50 Gy at primary tumor (86.5% vs. 34%, p = 0.012). Inguinal failure was observed in 5 patients (15%) who did not receive inguinal elective RT. Distant metastasis was observed in 11 patients (25.6%). Temporary interruption of the treatment as a result of acute toxicity was necessary in 12 patients (28%). Four patients developed mild chronic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that the treatment scheme employed was effective for anal sphincter preservation and local control; however, the incidence of distant metastases was relatively high. The clinical stage was the main prognostic factor for overall survival. Local control was higher in patients treated with doses of more than 50 Gy at primary tumor. The high incidence of inguinal failure implies the need for elective RT in this region.

Tratamento conservador do carcinoma do canal anal

OBJETIVO: Relatar os resultados do tratamento conservador do carcinoma de canal anal com radioterapia e quimioterapia do Centro de Tratamento e Pesquisa Hospital do Câncer A.C. Camargo. MÉTODO: De março de 1993 a dezembro de 2001, 47 pacientes com diagnóstico histológico de carcinoma do canal anal foram tratados de forma conservadora. A dose mediana de radioterapia na pelve e no tumor primário foi respectivamente de 45 e 55 Gy. A quimioterapia foi realizada com 5- Fluorouracil e Mitomicina-C, com doses medianas de 1000 mg/m² por quatro dias e 10 mg/m² por ciclo, respectivamente. Trinta e oito (80,8%) pacientes não receberam radioterapia em região inguinal. O tempo de seguimento mediano foi de 40 meses (oito dias a 116 meses). RESULTADOS: A resposta completa foi alcançada em 40 pacientes (85,1%). O controle local foi obtido em 31 (66%), e a função esfincteriana foi preservada em 38 (80,9%) casos. Metástases à distância foram detectadas em sete (14,9%) pacientes. A sobrevida global e sobrevida livre de doença em cinco anos foram de 61,5% e 50,1%, respectivamente. A sobrevida global e a sobrevida livre de doença em cinco anos para os pacientes que tiveram controle local foram 77,8% (p < 0,001) e 74,4% (p < 0,001). A sobrevida global e livre de doença em cinco anos para os pacientes com linfonodo inguinal clinicamente tumoral foi de 70,7% e 56,7%, respectivamente (p = 0,0085 e p = 0,0207). Doze (25,5%) pacientes necessitaram de interrupção temporária do tratamento. Cinco pacientes tiveram complicações crônicas leves. CONCLUSÃO: O tratamento realizado foi efetivo tanto para preservação do esfíncter anal quanto para controle local de doença. A presença de linfonodo inguinal clinicamente tumoral e a ausência de recidiva foram os principais fatores prognósticos para sobrevida global e sobrevida livre de doença. A taxa relativamente alta de recidiva em região inguinal sugere a necessidade de radioterapia eletiva nessa região.

Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Intracavitary Hyperthermia for Anal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate in a randomized way the clinical benefit of addition of intracavitary hyperthermia (ICHT) to a conventional chemoradiotherapy schedule in patients with T2-T3N0M0 anal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C combined with radiotherapy with (arm A: 24 patients) or without ICHT (arm B: 25 patients). A microwave applicator operating at 433 MHz inserted into the anal-rectal cavity was used for ICHT. Patients in both arms received 1000 mg/m2 per day of 5-FU on days 1-4 and days 28-31 plus 15 mg/m mitomycin-C on day 1. Radiotherapy was administered with a dose of 41.4 Gy (1.8 Gy per fraction) plus a booster dose of 14 Gy (2 Gy per fraction).

RESULTS

One patient from group A developed severe mucositis, whereas no severe morbidity was noted in the rest of the patients in both groups. The incidence of lower-intestine acute reactions was higher in the ICHT arm. After a 5-year follow up in the hyperthermia arm, 23 of 24 patients (95.8%) preserved their anorectal function and avoided permanent colostomy, whereas in the second arm, 17 of 25 (68.0%) had sphincter preservation. Local recurrence-free survival time was significantly higher in the ICHT arm (P = 0.0107, log rank test), whereas no significant difference in overall survival was noted.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ICHT to the chemoradiotherapy schedule of anal cancer seems to offer a new effective and safe therapeutic modality. The preservation of anorectal function seems to be the significant clinical benefit of adjuvant ICHT.

Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment in anal epidermoid cancer

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy alone or with combined chemotherapy is the first therapeutic option for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Failure of this conservative treatment may benefit of salvage abdominoperineal resection. This study was designed to analyze postoperative outcome and oncologic results in a single anticancer institution.

METHODS

Medical charts of 36 patients (median age, 57.9 years) who underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment between 1987 and 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 15 patients treated for immediate failure (Group I) and 21 patients for recurrence (Group II). Twenty-two patients have undergone primary use of flap reconstruction of the perineal wound. There were ten rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, nine omental flaps, two gracilis muscular flaps, and one combined flap.

RESULTS

There was no postoperative mortality. Median follow-up was 67 (range, 15-155) months. Primary closure of the perineum was obtained in 33 patients (92 percent). Secondary wound breakdown occurred in 23 of 33 patients (70 percent). Complications unrelated to the perineal wound occurred in 13 patients. The overall crude five-year survival after salvage abdominoperineal resection was 69.4 percent. The crude five-year survival in Group I and Group II was 60.7 and 71.5 percent respectively (P = 0.28). The crude five-year, disease-free survival in Groups I and II was 31.1 and 48.2 percent respectively (P = 0.10). Twenty-three patients experienced recurrences after salvage abdominoperineal resection (64 percent) with a mean delay of 30 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high incidence of perineal morbidity, salvage abdominoperineal resection for epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal has a high long-term survival rate.

[Epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal treated with definitive radiation therapy in a series of 305 patients]

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors and treatment toxicity in a serie of epidermoid cancers of the anal canal without evident metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1972 and January 1997, 305 patients (pts) were treated with curative-intent radiation therapy (RT). The T-stages according to the 1987 UICC classification were: 26 T1, 141 T2, 104 T3, and 34 T4. There were 49 pts with nodal involvement at presentation. Pretreatment anal function scoring according to our in-house system was: 22 scored 0, 182 scored 1, 74 scored 2, 7 scored 3, 11 scored 4, and 9 not available pts. The treatment started with external beam RT (EBRT) in 303 pts (median dose: 45 Gy). After a rest period of 4 to 6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 279 pts and by interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy (Bcy) in 17 pts. Seven pts received only one course of EBRT (mean dose: 49.5 Gy) and 2 pts were treated with interstitial 192Ir Bcy alone (55 and 60 Gy, respectively). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluoro-uracil and either mitomycin C or cisplatin) was delivered to 19 pts. Mean follow-up was 103 months.

RESULTS

At the end of RT local tumor clinical complete response (cCR) rate was 80%. Out of 61 non responders or local progressive tumors 27 (44%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection (APR). The rate of local tumor relapse (LR) was 12%. Out of 37 LTR, 20 (54%) were salvaged with APR and one with interstitial 192Ir Bcy. The orevall local tumor control (LC) rate with or without salvage local treatment was 84%. LC rate with a good anal function scoring (score 0 and 1) was 56.5%. Among 181/186 available pts who preserved their anus, 94% had a good anal function scoring. For a subgroup of 15 pts with length tumor <2 cm-N0, the LC rate after the end of RT was 100%, the LC rate with or without local salvage treatment was 100%, and among 13 available pts who preserved their anus, the anal function scoring was good in 12 pts (92%). The 10-years disease-free survival was 74%. After multivariate analysis, 3 independent predicting factors significantly influenced the disease-free survival: gap duration between 2 courses of RT (>38 days vs < or =38 days, P =0.0025), pretreatment anal function scoring (0 vs 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs 4, P =4.4 10(-6)), and cCR after the end of RT (no complete response vs complete response, P =2.5 10(-14)).

CONCLUSION

We confirm excellent results with RT in T1 and T2 lesions. However, chemoradiotherapy should be prefered to improve survival free of colostomy with a good anal sphincter function for tumors more than or equal to 2 cm in length and locally advanced tumors.

Results of definitive irradiation in a series of 305 epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal

PURPOSE

To evaluate our data concerning the prognostic factors for locoregional control, survival, late complications, and sphincter conservation in a series of epidermoid cancers of the anal canal without clinical evidence of metastasis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 1972 and January 1997, 305 patients were treated with curative-intent radiotherapy (RT). The T stage according to the 1987 International Union Against Cancer classification was T1 in 26, T2 in 141, T3 in 104, and T4 in 34. Forty-nine patients had nodal involvement at presentation. The pretreatment anal function score, according to our in-house system, was 0 for 22 patients, 1 for 182, 2 for 74, 3 for 7, and 4 for 11 patients; for 9 patients, scores were unavailable. The treatment started with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 303 patients (median dose 45 Gy). After a rest period of 4-6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 279 patients and by interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy in 17 patients. Seven patients received only one course of EBRT (mean dose 49.5 Gy), and 2 patients were treated with interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy alone (55 Gy and 60 Gy). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and either mitomycin C or cisplatin) was delivered to 19 patients. The mean follow-up was 103 months (median 84).

RESULTS

At the end of RT, the local tumor clinical complete response rate was 96% for T1, 87% for T2, 79% for T3, and 44% for T4. Of the 61 locally progressive tumors, 27 (44%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection. The rate of local tumor relapse was 12%. Among 37 local tumor relapses, 20 (54%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection and one with interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy. The overall local control rate (with or without salvage local therapy) was 84%. The local control rate with good anal function (score 0 or 1) was 56.5%. Of 181 available patients with their anus preserved, 94% had good anal function. For a subgroup of 15 patients with a tumor length of <2 cm and without nodal involvement, the clinical complete response rate after RT completion was 100%, the local control rate with or without local salvage treatment was 100%, and among 13 available patients with their anus preserved, the anal function score was good in 12 patients (92%). The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 74%. After multivariate analysis, three independent predictive factors significantly influenced disease-free survival: the interval between the two courses of RT (>38 days vs. < or =38 days, p = 0.0025), pretreatment anal function score (0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4, p = 4.4.10(-6)), and clinical complete response after RT completion (no complete response vs. complete response, p = 2.5.10(-14)).

CONCLUSION

We confirm the excellent results with RT in T1 and T2 lesions. However, to improve survival without colostomy with good anal sphincter function, chemoradiotherapy should be preferred for tumors > or =2 cm in length and for locally advanced tumors.

Pathological staging of epidermoid anal carcinoma for the new era

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for most patients with epidermoid anal cancer. Pre-treatment staging is based on size for T1-T3 lesions and clinical and radiological assessment of adjacent organ invasion for T4 lesions. For patients with residual or recurrent carcinoma, anorectal excision offers the best chance of oncological salvage. Pathological staging systems for anorectal excision specimens were validated at the time when surgical treatment was first line therapy. A validated staging system is necessary for salvage surgical excision specimens following an attempt to cure by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the purpose of prognosis and further treatment planning.

Inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging anal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The optimal treatment of clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes in patients with primary anal cancer has not yet been clearly defined. The presence of metastases in the inguinal lymph nodes is an adverse prognostic factor for anal cancer. In the present study the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for staging anal cancer was investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 1999 to March 2002, 8 patients with biopsy proven primary anal cancer underwent lymphoscintigraphy and dual-agent guided inguinal SLNB for nodal staging before starting multimodality treatment.

RESULTS

Inguinal SLNB was successful in all 8 patients (13 groins). A total of 20 hot and blue SLNs (mean 1,5 (1-2) per groins) were removed. In 2 patients (25%) the SLN was positive for metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoscintigraphy followed by dual-agent guided inguinal SLNB is technically feasible for staging patients with primary anal cancer. The detection of metastases in the removed sentinel lymph node(s) may alter the treatment and thus may improve the locoregional control and overall survival of these patients.

Current management of perianal intraepithelial neoplasia

The surgical management of intraepithelial perianal neoplasms is straightforward. The goal is complete locoregional control of the disease. Success is determined at the time of operation by frozen section analysis and reexcision if necessary. Procedures that will interfere with sphincter function should be delayed in favor of alternative treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Close long-term follow-up is necessary to ensure the best possible outcome should a lesion recur.

Intraarterial chemotherapy with polyoxyethylated castor oil free paclitaxel, incorporated in albumin nanoparticles (ABI-007): Phase I study of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and anal canal: preliminary evidence of clinical activity

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine the feasibility, maximum tolerated dose, and toxicities of intraarterial administration of paclitaxel-albumin nanoparticles in patients with advanced head and neck and recurrent anal canal squamous cell carcinoma. Antitumor activity also was assessed.

METHODS

Forty-three patients (31 with advanced head and neck and 12 with recurrent anal canal squamous cell carcinoma) were treated intraarterially with ABI-007 every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. In total, 120 treatment cycles were completed, 86 in patients with head and neck carcinoma (median, 3 cycles; range, 1-4) and 34 in patients with anal canal carcinoma (median, 3 cycles; range, 1-4). ABI-007 was compared preliminarily with Taxol for in vitro cytostatic activity. Increasing dose levels from 120 to 300 mg/m2 were studied in 18 patients. Pharmacokinetic profiles after intraarterial administration were obtained in a restricted number of patients.

RESULTS

The dose-limiting toxicity of ABI-007 was myelosuppression consisting of Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 patients. Nonhematologic toxicities included total alopecia (30 patients), gastrointestinal toxicity (3 patients, Grade 2), skin toxicity (5 patients, Grade 2), neurologic toxicity (4 patients, Grade 2) ocular toxicity (1 patient, Grade 2), flu-like syndrome (7 patients, Grade 2; 1 patient, Grade 3). In total, 120 transfemoral, percutaneous catheterization procedure-related complications occurred only during catheterization of the neck vessels in 3 patients (2 TIA, 1 hemiparesis) and resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraarterial administration of ABI-007 by percutaneous catheterization does not require premedication, is easy and reproducible, and has acceptable toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose in a single administration was 270 mg/m2. Most dose levels showed considerable antitumor activity (42 assessable patients with 80.9% complete response and partial response). The recommended Phase II dose is 230 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

What is the prevalence of symptomatic or asymptomatic femoral head osteonecrosis in patients previously treated with chemoradiation? A magnetic resonance study of anal cancer patients

It is generally assumed that femoral head osteonecrosis (FHO) is a serious but rare complication of pelvic radiotherapy. A review of the literature carried out by the authors indicates a prevalence of 4/763 (95% confidence interval 0.1%-1.3%). A recent publication has suggested that the prevalence of symptomatic FHO may be much greater than previously assumed as a result of sensitization of bone to radiation by concomitant treatment with chemotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the most sensitive modality for detecting and confirming symptomatic or asymptomatic FHO of any aetiology. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic FHO in patients previously treated for anal cancer by chemoradiation (CRT). The hips of 34 currently disease-free individuals (11 men and 23 women; median age 67 years, range 32-86) were scanned using a coronal T1-weighted sequence. The images were assessed for evidence of FHO. The median time of scanning after the end of CRT was 35 months (range 6-107). No cases (0/34) of symptomatic or asymptomatic FHO were detected in these patients. Given the established sensitivity of MRI in the detection of FHO, it is concluded that changes indicative of osteonecrosis were uncommon after CRT in the current cohort of patients. Recent evidence from the literature suggests, however, that elderly females are at greatest risk of developing FHO after CRT.

Anorectal injury following pelvic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge of the effects of radiation on the anorectum is based on a limited number of studies. Variability in delivery techniques, both currently and historically, combined with a paucity of prospective and randomized studies makes interpretation of the literature difficult. This review presents the existing evidence and identifies areas that require further work.

METHODS

This review is based on a literature search (Medline and PubMed) and manual cross-referencing.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

More than three-quarters of patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy experience acute anorectal symptoms and up to one-fifth suffer from late-phase radiation proctitis. About 5 per cent develop other chronic complications, such as fistula, stricture and disabling faecal incontinence. The risk of rectal cancer may be increased. Conservative treatment options are of limited value. Surgery may be considered if symptoms are severe, provided sphincter function is adequate and recurrent disease is excluded. Large prospective studies with accurate dosimetric data and long-term follow-up are needed to provide meaningful information on which to base new strategies to minimize the side-effects from radiotherapy.

Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The authors performed a specific analysis of the clinical significance of inguinal lymph nodes metastases in patients with anal canal carcinoma (ACC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 270 patients who were treated in Lyon between 1980 and 1996 with radiotherapy with curative intent for ACC: No elective irradiation of clinically normal inguinal areas was performed. Patients with metastatic inguinal lymph nodes were treated with inguinal dissection and postoperative irradiation with a dose of 50 grays over 5 weeks. Concomitant chemoradiation, usually with a regimen of fluorouracil and cisplatinum, was given to 159 patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the whole series was 72 months. Synchronous inguinal metastases were observed in 10% of patients (n = 27; the rate was 16% for patients with T3--T4 lesions), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 54.4%. Metachronous inguinal metastases were seen in 19 patients (7.8%), and the 5-year overall survival rate of these patients was 41.4%. An original finding was that, when the primary tumor clearly was located on a single lateral side of the anal canal, the inguinal lymphatic metastases was always homolateral to it (36 of 36 synchronous plus metachronous tumors).

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this series of patients and a review of the literature are in favor of a selective approach in the management of inguinal lymph node involvement for patients with ACC, depending on the disease stage and the location of the primary tumors.

Experience with split-course external beam irradiation +/- chemotherapy and integrated Ir-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of primary carcinomas of the anal canal

PURPOSE

The effect of the treatment of anal cancer by performing a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost during a short split between the external beam radiotherapy series (EBR) +/- chemotherapy was investigated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-nine patients with anal canal cancers, stages T1-T4 N0-2 M0, were treated with split-course EBR (50-50.4 Gy) and a Iridium 192 ((192)Ir-) HDR boost (6 Gy) performed during the 1-2-week split. Patients who failed to achieve a complete tumor response received additional brachytherapy. Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C was offered to patients with tumors > 3 cm and employed concomitantly on days 1-5 and day 1, respectively, of each EBR series.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 3 to 140 months (median 31). Median treatment duration was 56 days. The 3-year (5-year) actuarial rates of locoregional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 81% (76%) and 80% (76%), respectively. The crude rate of anal preservation was 77% overall, and 97% in patients in whom LRC was achieved. Uncompromised anal function was recorded in 93% of these patients. The actuarial 3-year (5-year) rate of colostomy-free survival (CFS) was 78% (73%). There was a statistically significant difference in LRC and DSS according to stage, tumor size, and nodal status. Complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 7.6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The integration of the HDR boost in a split-course EBR regimen +/- chemotherapy resulted in excellent sphincter function without an increase of severe complications and with rates of LRC, DSS, and CFS, which compare favorably with those reported in the literature.

[Radiochemotherapy in anal canal epidermoid cancer]

Epidermoid anal canal carcinomas are radio- and chemosensitive tumors. Within a few decades, conservative treatment has replaced mutilating surgery as standard therapeutic practice. Exclusive high-dose radiotherapy remains the standard treatment of early stages T1-T2 N0 smaller than 4 cm. Three phase III trials demonstrated the benefits of combined chemotherapy and irradiation on the local efficacy and colostomy-free survival. Mitomycin C and 5 FU were delivered on weeks 1 and 5 of the irradiation. Concomitant 5 FU and CDDP regimen and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated on phase II trials. Ongoing intensification phase III trials are described.