1
|
Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M. Colorectal cancer para-aortic lymph node metastases: surgery should not be considered. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad443. [PMID: 38430197 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sodergren SC, Johnson CD, Gilbert A, Darlington AS, Cocks K, Guren MG, Rivin Del Campo E, Brannan C, Christensen P, Chu W, Chung H, Dennis K, Desideri I, Gilbert DC, Glynne-Jones R, Jefford M, Johansson M, Johnsson A, Juul T, Kardamakis D, Lai-Kwon J, McFarlane V, Miguel IMC, Nugent K, Peters F, Riechelmann RP, Turhal NS, Wong S, Vassiliou V. International Validation of the EORTC QLQ-ANL27, a Field Study to Test the Anal Cancer-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1155-1164. [PMID: 36402360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) health-related quality of life questionnaire for anal cancer (QLQ-ANL27) supplements the EORTC cancer generic measure (QLQ-C30) to measure concerns specific to people with anal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. This study tested the psychometric properties and acceptability of the QLQ-ANL27. METHODS AND MATERIALS People with anal cancer were recruited from 15 countries to complete the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-ANL27 and provide feedback on the QLQ-ANL27. Item responses, scale structure (multitrait scaling, factor analysis), reliability (internal consistency and reproducibility) and sensitivity (known group comparisons and responsiveness to change) of the QLQ-ANL27 were evaluated. RESULTS Data from 382 people were included in the analyses. The EORTC QLQ-ANL27 was acceptable, comprehensive, and easy to complete, taking an average 8 minutes to complete. Psychometric analyses supported the EORTC QLQ-ANL27 items and reliability (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.71-0.93 and test-retest coefficients above 0.7) and validity of the scales (particularly nonstoma bowel symptoms and pain/discomfort). Most scales distinguished people according to treatment phase and performance status. Bowel (nonstoma), pain/discomfort, and vaginal symptoms were sensitive to deteriorations over time. The stoma-related scales remained untested because of low numbers of people with a stoma. Revisions to the scoring and question ordering of the sexual items were proposed. CONCLUSIONS The QLQ-ANL27 has good psychometric properties and is available in 16 languages for people treated with chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. It is used in clinical trials and has a potential role in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kim Cocks
- KCStats Consultancy, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - Marianne G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eleonor Rivin Del Campo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon University Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - William Chu
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Michael Jefford
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mia Johansson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dimitrios Kardamakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Julia Lai-Kwon
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vicky McFarlane
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Karen Nugent
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Femke Peters
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Shun Wong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vassilios Vassiliou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Center, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M. Should the RAPIDO schedule represent standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer? Ann Oncol 2022; 33:745-746. [PMID: 35568280 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Harrison
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haak HE, Beets GL, Peeters K, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Rödel C, Kuo L, Calvo FA, Garcia-Aguilar J, Glynne-Jones R, Pucciarelli S, Suarez J, Theodoropoulos G, Biondo S, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Maas M. Prevalence of nodal involvement in rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1251-1258. [PMID: 34240110 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ypN+ status according to ypT category in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, and to assess the impact of ypN+ on disease recurrence and survival by pooled analysis of individual-patient data. METHODS Individual-patient data from 10 studies of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer were included. Pooled rates of ypN+ disease were calculated with 95 per cent confidence interval for each ypT category. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were undertaken to assess influence of ypN status on 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Data on 1898 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 50 (range 0-219) months. The pooled rate of ypN+ disease was 7 per cent for ypT0, 12 per cent for ypT1, 17 per cent for ypT2, 40 per cent for ypT3, and 46 per cent for ypT4 tumours. Patients with ypN+ disease had lower 5-year DFS and OS (46.2 and 63.4 per cent respectively) than patients with ypN0 tumours (74.5 and 83.2 per cent) (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed ypN+ status to be an independent predictor of recurrence and death. CONCLUSION Risk of nodal metastases (ypN+) after chemoradiotherapy increases with advancing ypT category and needs to be considered if an organ-preserving strategy is contemplated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H E Haak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - G L Beets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - K Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nelemans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - V Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - L Kuo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - F A Calvo
- Department of Oncology, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Mount Vernon Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Pucciarelli
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, First Surgical Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - J Suarez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - G Theodoropoulos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Athens Medical School, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - S Biondo
- Department of Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Slawinski C, Malcomson L, Barriuso J, Guo H, Harkin A, Iveson T, Glynne-Jones R, Van de Velde C, Renehan A. O-4 Average cumulative relative dose of adjuvant chemotherapy is more important than average relative dose intensity for colorectal cancer survival, with implications for treating obese patients: The OCTOPUS consortium. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
6
|
Drami I, Pring ET, Gould L, Malietzis G, Naghibi M, Athanasiou T, Glynne-Jones R, Jenkins JT. Body Composition and Dose-limiting Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Treatment; a Systematic Review of the Literature. Could Muscle Mass be the New Body Surface Area in Chemotherapy Dosing? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e540-e552. [PMID: 34147322 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy dosing is traditionally based on body surface area calculations; however, these calculations ignore separate tissue compartments, such as the lean body mass (LBM), which is considered a big pool of drug distribution. In our era, colorectal cancer patients undergo a plethora of computed tomography scans as part of their diagnosis, staging and monitoring, which could easily be used for body composition analysis and LBM calculation, allowing for personalised chemotherapy dosing. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effect of muscle mass on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), among different chemotherapy regimens used in colorectal cancer patients. This review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from 1946 to August 2019. The primary search terms were 'sarcopenia', 'myopenia', 'chemotherapy toxicity', 'chemotherapy dosing', 'dose limiting toxicity', 'colorectal cancer', 'primary colorectal cancer' and 'metastatic colorectal cancer'. Outcomes of interest were - DLT and chemotoxicity related to body composition, and chemotherapy dosing on LBM. In total, 363 studies were identified, with 10 studies fulfilling the selection criteria. Seven studies were retrospective and three were prospective. Most studies used the same body composition analysis software but the chemotherapy regimens used varied. Due to marked study heterogeneity, quantitative data synthesis was not possible. Two studies described a toxicity cut-off value for 5-fluorouracil and one for oxaliplatin based on LBM. The rest of the studies showed an association between different body composition metrics and DLTs. Prospective studies are required with a larger colorectal cancer cohort, longitudinal monitoring of body composition changes during treatment, similar body composition analysis techniques, agreed cut-off values and standardised chemotherapy regimens. Incorporation of body composition analysis in the clinical setting will allow early identification of sarcopenic patients, personalised dosing based on their LBM and early optimisation of these patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Drami
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK; Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, School of Medicine St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
| | - E T Pring
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - L Gould
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Malietzis
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Naghibi
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - T Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - J T Jenkins
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM, Lopes A, Muirhead R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R. Reply to the letter to the editor: DPD testing in radical chemoradiation for anal squamous cell carcinoma? by R. Muirhead, H. Jones, D. Gilbert, A. Gilbert & C. Jacobs. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1587-1588. [PMID: 32822831 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - H M Meadows
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | - A Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | - R Muirhead
- Oxford Cancer & Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - R Adams
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM, Lopes A, Muirhead R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R. Impact of compliance to chemoradiation on long-term outcomes in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: results of a post hoc analysis from the randomised phase III ACT II trial. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1376-1385. [PMID: 32619648 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiation is standard-of-care for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Poor compliance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy treatment interruptions and unplanned breaks may impact adversely on long-term outcomes. METHODS The ACT II trial recruited 940 patients with localised squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, and assigned patients to mitomycin (week 1) or cisplatin (weeks 1 and 5), with fluorouracil (weeks 1 and 5) and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 38 days). This post hoc analysis examined the association between baseline factors (age, gender, site, T stage and N stage), and compliance to treatment (radiotherapy and chemotherapy), and their effects on locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Compliance was categorised into groups. Radiotherapy: six groups according to total dose and overall treatment time (OTT). Chemotherapy: three groups (A = per-protocol; B = dose reduction or delay; C = omitted). RESULTS A total of 931/940 patients were assessable for radiotherapy and 936 for chemotherapy compliance. Baseline glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min and cisplatin were significantly associated with poor week 5 compliance to chemotherapy (P = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively). Omission of week 5 chemotherapy was associated with significantly worse locoregional failure-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.53 (1.33-4.82) P = 0.005]. Dose reductions/delays or omission of week 5 chemotherapy were associated with significantly worse PFS {HR: 1.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-2.06], P = 0.002 and HR: 2.39 (95% CI: 1.44-3.98), P = 0.001, respectively} and OS [HR: 1.92 (95% CI: 1.41-2.63), P < 0.001 and HR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.63-5.08), P < 0.001, respectively]. Receiving the target radiotherapy dose in >42 days is associated with worse PFS and OS [HR: 1.72 (95% CI: 1.17-2.54), P =0.006]. CONCLUSION Poor compliance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with worse locoregional failure-free survival, PFS and OS. Treatment interruptions should be minimised, and OTT and total dose maintained. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER ISRCTN 26715889.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - H M Meadows
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | - A Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | - R Muirhead
- Oxford Cancer & Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - R Adams
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Glynne-Jones R, Hall M, Nagtegaal ID. The optimal timing for the interval to surgery after short course preoperative radiotherapy (5 ×5 Gy) in rectal cancer - are we too eager for surgery? Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 90:102104. [PMID: 33002819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The improved overall survival (OS) after short course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5 Gy reported in the early rectal cancer trials could not be replicated in subsequent phase III trials. This original survival advantage is attributed to poor quality of surgery and the large differential in local recurrence rates, with and without SCPRT. Immuno-modulation during and after SCPRT and its clinical implications have been poorly investigated. We propose an alternative explanation for this survival benefit in terms of immunological mechanisms induced by SCPRT and the timing of surgery, which may validate the concept of consolidation chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies of SCPRT from 1985 to 2019. We aimed to examine the precise timing of surgery in days following SCPRT and identify evidence for immune modulation, neo-antigens and memory cell induction by radiation. RESULTS Considerable variability is reported in randomised trials for median overall treatment time (OTT) from start of SCPRT to surgery (8-14 days). Only three early trials showed a benefit in terms of OS from SCPRT, although the level of benefit in preventing local recurrence was consistent across all trials. Different patterns of immune effects are observed within days after SCPRT depending on the OTT, but human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-1 expression was not upregulated. CONCLUSIONS SCPRT has a substantial immune-stimulatory potential. The importance of the timing of surgery after SCPRT may have been underestimated. An optimal interval for surgery after 5 × 5 Gy may lead to better outcomes, which is possibly exploited in total neoadjuvant therapy schedules using consolidation chemotherapy. Individual patient meta-analyses from appropriate SCPRT trials examining outcomes for each day and prospective trials are needed to clarify the validity of this hypothesis. The interaction of SCPRT with tumour adaptive immunology, in particular the kinetics and timing, should be examined further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
| | - M Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
| | - I D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboudumc, PO BOX 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
In colon cancer, primary surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy represents the standard of care. In rectal cancer, the standard of care is preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiation, which significantly reduces local recurrence but has no impact on subsequent metastatic disease or overall survival. The administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery can increase the chance of a curative resection and improves long-term outcomes in patients with liver metastases. Hence, NACT is being explored in both primary rectal and colon cancers as an alternative strategy to shrink the tumor, facilitate a curative resection, and simultaneously counter the risk of metastases. Yet, this lack of clarity regarding the precise aims of NACT (downstaging, maximizing response, or improving survival) is hindering progress. The appropriate cytotoxic agents, the optimal regimen, the number of cycles, or duration of NACT prior to surgery or in the postoperative setting remains undefined. Several potential strategies for integrating NACT are discussed with their advantages and disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyotsna Bhudia
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Smith
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Marcia Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carter TJ, Jeyaneethi J, Kumar J, Karteris E, Glynne-Jones R, Hall M. Identification of Cancer-Associated Circulating Cells in Anal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082229. [PMID: 32785154 PMCID: PMC7465059 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Whilst anal cancer accounts for less than 1% of all new cancer cases, incidence rates have increased by up to 70% in the last 30 years with the majority of cases driven by human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Standard treatment for localised anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Localised progression is the predominant pattern of relapse but well under 50% of cases are salvaged by surgery, predominantly because confirming recurrence within post-radiation change is very challenging. Identifying cancer-associated circulating cells (CCs) in peripheral blood could offer a corroborative method of monitoring treatment efficacy and identifying relapse early. To study this, nucleated cells were isolated from the blood of patients with anal cancer prior to, during, and after CRT and processed through the Amnis® ImageStream®X Mk II Imaging Flow Cytometer, without prior enrichment, using Pan-cytokeratin (PCK), CD45 antibodies and making use of the DNA dye DRAQ5. Analysis was undertaken using IDEAS software to identify those cells that were PCK-positive and DRAQ5-positive as well as CD45-negative; these were designated as CCs. CCs were identified in 7 of 8 patients; range 60-876 cells per mL of blood. This first report of the successful identification of CCs in anal cancer patients raises the possibility that liquid biopsies will find a future role as a prognostic/diagnostic tool in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J. Carter
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK; (T.J.C.); (R.G.-J.)
| | - Jeyarooban Jeyaneethi
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, London UB83PH, UK; (J.J.); (J.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Juhi Kumar
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, London UB83PH, UK; (J.J.); (J.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Emmanouil Karteris
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, London UB83PH, UK; (J.J.); (J.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK; (T.J.C.); (R.G.-J.)
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, London UB83PH, UK; (J.J.); (J.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Marcia Hall
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK; (T.J.C.); (R.G.-J.)
- Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University, London UB83PH, UK; (J.J.); (J.K.); (E.K.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rao S, Sclafani F, Eng C, Adams RA, Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, Benson A, Bryant A, Peckitt C, Segelov E, Roy A, Seymour MT, Welch J, Saunders MP, Muirhead R, O’Dwyer P, Bridgewater J, Bhide S, Glynne-Jones R, Arnold D, Cunningham D. International Rare Cancers Initiative Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial of Cisplatin and Fluorouracil Versus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Advanced Anal Cancer: InterAAct. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2510-2518. [PMID: 32530769 PMCID: PMC7406334 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.03266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare cisplatin plus fluorouracil (FU) versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naïve advanced anal cancer to establish the optimal regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who had not received systemic therapy for advanced anal cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (day 1) plus FU 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1-4) every 21 days or carboplatin (area under the curve, 5; day 1) plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15) every 28 days for 24 weeks, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Primary and secondary end points were assessed in a hierarchic model to compare the regimens and pick the winner. RESULTS We conducted an international multicenter randomized phase II study in 60 centers between December 2013 and November 2017. Median follow-up was 28.6 months. A total of 91 patients were randomly assigned: 46 to cisplatin plus FU and 45 to carboplatin plus paclitaxel. ORR was 57% (95% CI, 39.4% to 73.7%) for cisplatin plus FU versus 59% (95% CI, 42.1% to 74.4%) for carboplatin plus paclitaxel. More serious adverse events were noted in the cisplatin plus FU arm (62%) compared with the carboplatin plus paclitaxel arm (36%; P = .016). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 9.0 months) for cisplatin plus FU compared with 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 8.8 months) for carboplatin plus paclitaxel. Median overall survival was 12.3 months for cisplatin plus FU (95% CI, 9.2 to 17.7 months) compared with 20 months (95% CI, 12.7 months to not reached) for carboplatin plus paclitaxel (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.47; P = .014). CONCLUSION This is the first international randomized trial to our knowledge conducted in chemotherapy-naïve advanced anal cancer. Although there was no difference in ORR, the association with clinically relevant reduced toxicity and a trend toward longer survival suggest that carboplatin plus paclitaxel should be considered as a new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheela Rao
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Cathy Eng
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Al Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Eva Segelov
- Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amitesh Roy
- Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter O’Dwyer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Shree Bhide
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marijnen CAM, Peters FP, Rödel C, Bujko K, Haustermans K, Fokas E, Glynne-Jones R, Valentini V, Spindler KLG, Guren MG, Maingon P, Calvo FA, Pares O, Glimelius B, Sebag-Montefiore D. International expert consensus statement regarding radiotherapy treatment options for rectal cancer during the COVID 19 pandemic. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:213-215. [PMID: 32342861 PMCID: PMC7194592 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - F P Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | - K Bujko
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - K Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Valentini
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - K-L G Spindler
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - M G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | | | - F A Calvo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - O Pares
- Department of Radiotherapy, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leeds Cancer Centre, University of Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Owczarczyk K, Kozarski R, Qureshi A, Gaya A, Siddique M, Cook G, Glynne-Jones R, Goh V. SO-14 Baseline diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging features to predict recurrence of anal squamous cell carcinoma following chemoradiotherapy. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
15
|
Van Cutsem E, Danielewicz I, Saunders MP, Pfeiffer P, Argilés G, Borg C, Glynne-Jones R, Punt CJA, Van de Wouw AJ, Fedyanin M, Stroyakovskiy D, Kroening H, Garcia-Alfonso P, Wasan H, Falcone A, Kanehisa A, Egorov A, Aubel P, Amellal N, Moiseenko V. Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1160-1168. [PMID: 32497736 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We designed an open-label, noncomparative phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) and capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B) in untreated patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were not candidates for combination with cytotoxic chemotherapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 29 April 2016 to 29 March 2017, 153 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either TT-B (N = 77) or C-B (N = 76). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The primary PFS analysis was performed after 100 events (radiological progression or death) were observed. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL; QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires), and safety. RESULTS Median (range) duration of treatment was 7.8 (6.0-9.7) months and 6.2 (4.1-9.1) months in the TT-B and C-B groups, respectively. Median (range) PFS was 9.2 (7.6-11.6) and 7.8 (5.5-10.1) months, respectively. Median (range) OS was 18 (15.2 to NA) and 16.2 (12.5 to NA) months, respectively. QoL questionnaires showed no relevant changes over time for either treatment. Therapies were well tolerated. Patients receiving TT-B had more grade ≥3 neutropenia (47% versus 5% with C-B). Patients receiving C-B had more grade ≥3 hand-foot syndrome (12% versus 0% with TT-B) and grade ≥3 diarrhea (8% versus 1% with TT-B), consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents. CONCLUSION TT-B treatment showed promising clinical activity in untreated patients with unresectable mCRC ineligible for intensive therapy, with an acceptable safety profile and no clinically relevant changes in QoL. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT02743221 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - I Danielewicz
- Szpitale Wojewodzkie w Gdyni/Gdansk Medical University, Gdynia, Poland
| | - M P Saunders
- Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - G Argilés
- Vall d'Hebrón Institute of Oncology and Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Borg
- University Hospital Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - C J A Punt
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam
| | - A J Van de Wouw
- VieCuri Medisch Centrum Noord-Limburg, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - M Fedyanin
- NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - H Kroening
- Schwerpunktpraxis für Haematologie und Onkologie Hasselbachplatz, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - H Wasan
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Falcone
- University Hospital of Pisa, Department of Oncology, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Kanehisa
- Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France
| | - A Egorov
- Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France
| | - P Aubel
- Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France
| | - N Amellal
- Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France
| | - V Moiseenko
- Saint-Petersburg Scientific Practical Center for Specialized Medical Care, St Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mirnezami R, Knowles J, Kar A, Glynne-Jones R. Preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg 2020; 107:e263. [PMID: 32463479 PMCID: PMC7283655 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Mirnezami
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, London, UK
| | - J Knowles
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, London, UK
| | - A Kar
- Radiation Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Evans R, Taylor S, Kalasthry J, Sakai N, Miles A, Aboagye A, Agoramoorthy L, Ahmed S, Amadi A, Anand G, Atkin G, Austria A, Ball S, Bazari F, Beable R, Beare S, Beedham H, Beeston T, Bharwani N, Bhatnagar G, Bhowmik A, Blakeway L, Blunt D, Boavida P, Boisfer D, Breen D, Bridgewater J, Burke S, Butawan R, Campbell Y, Chang E, Chao D, Chukundah S, Clarke C, Collins B, Collins C, Conteh V, Couture J, Crosbie J, Curtis H, Daniel A, Davis L, Desai K, Duggan M, Ellis S, Elton C, Engledow A, Everitt C, Ferdous S, Frow A, Furneaux M, Gibbons N, Glynne-Jones R, Gogbashian A, Goh V, Gourtsoyianni S, Green A, Green L, Green L, Groves A, Guthrie A, Hadley E, Halligan S, Hameeduddin A, Hanid G, Hans S, Hans B, Higginson A, Honeyfield L, Hughes H, Hughes J, Hurl L, Isaac E, Jackson M, Jalloh A, Janes S, Jannapureddy R, Jayme A, Johnson A, Johnson E, Julka P, Kalasthry J, Karapanagiotou E, Karp S, Kay C, Kellaway J, Khan S, Koh D, Light T, Limbu P, Lock S, Locke I, Loke T, Lowe A, Lucas N, Maheswaran S, Mallett S, Marwood E, McGowan J, Mckirdy F, Mills-Baldock T, Moon T, Morgan V, Morris S, Morton A, Nasseri S, Navani N, Nichols P, Norman C, Ntala E, Nunes A, Obichere A, O'Donohue J, Olaleye I, Oliver A, Onajobi A, O'Shaughnessy T, Padhani A, Pardoe H, Partridge W, Patel U, Perry K, Piga W, Prezzi D, Prior K, Punwani S, Pyers J, Rafiee H, Rahman F, Rajanpandian I, Ramesh S, Raouf S, Reczko K, Reinhardt A, Robinson D, Rockall A, Russell P, Sargus K, Scurr E, Shahabuddin K, Sharp A, Shepherd B, Shiu K, Sidhu H, Simcock I, Simeon C, Smith A, Smith D, Snell D, Spence J, Srirajaskanthan R, Stachini V, Stegner S, Stirling J, Strickland N, Tarver K, Teague J, Thaha M, Train M, Tulmuntaha S, Tunariu N, van Ree K, Verjee A, Wanstall C, Weir S, Wijeyekoon S, Wilson J, Wilson S, Win T, Woodrow L, Yu D. Patient deprivation and perceived scan burden negatively impact the quality of whole-body MRI. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:308-315. [PMID: 31836179 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the association between the image quality of cancer staging whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and patient demographics, distress, and perceived scan burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS A sample of patients recruited prospectively to multicentre trials comparing WB-MRI with standard scans for staging lung and colorectal cancer were invited to complete two questionnaires. The baseline questionnaire, administered at recruitment, collated data on demographics, distress and co-morbidity. The follow-up questionnaire, completed after staging investigations, measured perceived WB-MRI scan burden (scored 1 low to 7 high). WB-MRI anatomical coverage, and technical quality was graded by a radiographic technician and grading combined to categorise the scan as "optimal", "sub-optimal" or "degraded". A radiologist categorised 30 scans to test interobserver agreement. Data were analysed using the chi-square, Fisher's exact, t-tests, and multinomial regression. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study (53 lung, 61 colorectal; average age 65.3 years, SD=11.8; 66 men [57.9%]). Overall, 45.6% (n=52), scans were classified as "optimal" quality, 39.5% (n=45) "sub-optimal", and 14.9% (n=17) as "degraded". In adjusted analyses, greater deprivation level and higher patient-reported scan burden were both associated with a higher likelihood of having a sub-optimal versus an optimal scan (odds ratio [OR]: 4.465, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.454 to 13.709, p=0.009; OR: 1.987, CI: 1.153 to 3.425, p=0.013, respectively). None of the variables predicted the likelihood of having a degraded scan. CONCLUSIONS Deprivation and patients' perceived experience of the WB-MRI are related to image quality. Tailored protocols and individualised patient management before and during WB-MRI may improve image quality.
Collapse
|
18
|
Glynne-Jones R, Bhuva N, Harrison M. Unintended consequences of treating early rectal cancers for complete clinical response with chemoradiotherapy. Colorectal Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.2217/crc-2019-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The aim was to examine the current trend in rectal cancer, which is to extend ’watch-and-wait’ to earlier-stage tumors, not normally treated with chemoradiotherapy, to define the up-side and down-side regarding quality of life (QOL) and anorectal/sexual/urinary function from this approach. We reviewed the literature regarding a ‘watch-and-wait’ strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was complete clinical response. Secondary measures included colostomy rate, functional outcomes and QOL. There is a trend to use chemoradiotherapy in earlier tumors using dose-escalation of radiation and/or additional chemotherapy, resulting in high rates of complete clinical response, which may impact adversely on QOL if radical surgery is subsequently required. Focusing on organ-preservation as the primary goal of treatment rather than overall functional outcomes and QOL for the whole population, may not provide patients with sufficient information for optimal decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Neel Bhuva
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gilbert A, Drinkwater K, McParland L, Adams R, Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M, Hawkins MA, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gilbert DC, Muirhead R. UK national cohort of anal cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: One-year oncological and patient-reported outcomes. Eur J Cancer 2020; 128:7-16. [PMID: 32109852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for anal cancer. Following national UK implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), this prospective, national cohort evaluates the one-year oncological outcomes and patient-reported toxicity outcomes (PRO) after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A national cohort of UK cancer centers implementing IMRT was carried out between February to July 2015. Cancer centers provided data on oncological outcomes, including survival, and disease and colostomy status at one-year. EORTC-QLQ core (C30) and colorectal (CR29) questionnaires were completed at baseline and one-year followup. The PRO scores at baseline and one year were compared. RESULTS 40 UK Cancer Centers returned data with a total of 187 patients included in the analysis. 92% received mitomycin with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. One-year overall survival was 94%; 84% were disease-free and 86% colostomy-free at one-year followup. At one year, PRO results found significant improvements in buttock pain, blood and mucus in stools, pain, constipation, appetite loss, and health anxiety compared to baseline. No significant deteriorations were reported in diarrhea, bowel frequency, and flatulence. Urinary symptom scores were low at one year. Moderate impotence symptoms at baseline remained at one year, and a moderate deterioration in dyspareunia reported. CONCLUSIONS With national anal cancer IMRT implementation, at this early pre-defined time point, one-year oncological outcomes were reassuring and resulted in good disease-related symptom control. one-year symptomatic complications following CRT for anal cancer using IMRT techniques appear to be relatively mild. These PRO results provide a basis to benchmark future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gilbert
- University of Leeds, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | | | - L McParland
- Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R Adams
- Cardiff University - Centre for Trials Research and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, UK
| | - M Harrison
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- University of Leeds, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - D C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton, UK
| | - R Muirhead
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kane C, Glynne-Jones R. Should we favour the use of 5 × 5 preoperative radiation in rectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 81:101908. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rivin del Campo E, Matzinger O, Haustermans K, Bosset JF, Glynne-Jones R, Winter K, Konski A, Ajani J, Peiffert D, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Puyraveau M, Chakravarthy B, Meadows H, Northover J, Collette L, Christiaens M, Maingon P. Analyse des données regroupées de paramètres de radiothérapie externe d’essais de phase II et III de chimioradiothérapie du cancer de canal anal. Cancer Radiother 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
23
|
Wyrwicz L, Saunders M, Hall M, Ng J, Prasad VB, Lautermilch N, Rashford M, Jin J, Formenti S, Glynne-Jones R. A phase Ib study of E7046 (AN0025) in combination with radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) in preoperative treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
24
|
Owczarczyk K, Prezzi D, Kozarski R, Gaya A, Siddique M, Cook G, Glynne-Jones R, Goh V. Baseline Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Recurrence of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ASCC) Following Chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
25
|
Papamichael D, Glynne-Jones R. Identifying patients who may benefit from oxaliplatin-containing perioperative chemo(radio)therapy for rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1616-1618. [PMID: 29982296 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D Papamichael
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Glynne-Jones R. Extending the interval to surgery in rectal cancer and filling the time with chemotherapy—how much is enough? Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1188-1190. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
27
|
Abdul-Latif M, Bhuva N, Harrison M, Glynne-Jones R. Definitive chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer: treatment outcomes from a regional cancer centre. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz155.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Owczarczyk K, Prezzi D, Cascino M, Kozarski R, Gaya A, Siddique M, Cook GJ, Glynne-Jones R, Goh V. MRI heterogeneity analysis for prediction of recurrence and disease free survival in anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:119-126. [PMID: 31005205 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of image heterogeneity analysis of standard care magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) to predict chemoradiotherapy (CRT) outcome. The ability to predict disease recurrence following CRT has the potential to inform personalized radiotherapy approaches currently being explored in novel clinical trials. METHODS An IRB waiver was obtained for retrospective analysis of standard care MRIs from ASCC patients presenting between 2010 and 2014. Whole tumor 3D volume-of-interest (VOI) was outlined on T2-weighted (T2w) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the pre- and post-treatment scans. Independent imaging features most predictive of disease recurrence were added to the baseline clinico-pathological model and the predictive value of respective extended models was calculated using net reclassification improvement (NRI) algorithm. Cross-validation analysis was carried out to determine percentage error reduction with inclusion of imaging features to the baseline model for both endpoints. RESULTS Forty patients who underwent 1.5 T pelvic MRI at baseline and following completion of CRT were included. A combination of two baseline MR heterogeneity features (baseline T2w energy and DWI coefficient of variation) was most predictive of disease recurrence resulting in significant NRI (p = 0 < 0.001). This was confirmed in cross-validation analysis with 34.8% percentage error reduction for the primary endpoint and 18.1% reduction for the secondary endpoint with addition of imaging variables to baseline model. CONCLUSION MRI heterogeneity analysis offers complementary information, in addition to clinical staging, in predicting outcome of CRT in anal SCC, warranting validation in larger datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasia Owczarczyk
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Davide Prezzi
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert Kozarski
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Gaya
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Siddique
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary J Cook
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Vicky Goh
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Our aim is to discuss the current established management of care and associated prevention strategies of anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA). In general, the development of SCCA is commonly linked to a prior history of HPV. Unfortunately, HPV vaccination continues to be underutilized in the United States versus other countries. Increased acknowledgment of the importance of HPV vaccination as an anticancer vaccine should be encouraged. The present standard of care is primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which results in a high level of disease control for small, early-stage SCCA. More advanced cancers still fare poorly with this treatment, and the disease relapses locoregionally in the majority of cases (30%-50% of patients), resulting in an abdominoperineal resection. Current treatment recommendations are associated with substantial morbidity; alternative radiation doses and/or novel combinations of agents with CRT are needed to improve quality of life and oncologic outcomes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard of care for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic disease, with a possible new treatment paradigm of carboplatin/weekly paclitaxel. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibition appears to have a promising role in the setting of patients with refractory disease. Several clinical trials with immunotherapeutic and vaccine approaches for locally advanced and metastatic anal cancer are ongoing, as are HPV-agnostic umbrella trials. Whenever possible, clinical trial enrollment is always encouraged for further therapeutic development in the setting of a rare cancer, given the potentially substantial global impact for other HPV-associated malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Eng
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Craig Messick
- 2 Surgical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- 3 East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pan YB, Maeda Y, Wilson A, Glynne-Jones R, Vaizey CJ. Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1427-1437. [PMID: 30264638 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1503713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a paucity of data on incidence and mechanisms of long-term gastrointestinal consequences after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. Most of the adverse effects reported were based on traditional external beam radiotherapy whilst only short-term follow-ups have been available for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and there is lack of knowledge about consequences of dose-escalation radiotherapy. METHOD A systematic literature review. RESULTS Two thousand nine hundred and eighty-five titles (excluding duplicates) were identified through the search; 130 articles were included in this review. The overall incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity was reported to be 7-64.5%, with Grade 3 and above (classified as severe) up to 33.3%. The most commonly reported late toxicities were fecal incontinence (up to 44%), diarrhea (up to 26.7%), and ulceration (up to 22.6%). Diarrhea, fecal incontinence and buttock pain were associated with lower scores in radiotherapy specific quality of life scales (QLQ-CR29, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-CR38) compared to healthy controls. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy appears to reduce late toxicity. CONCLUSION Late gastrointestinal toxicities are common with severe toxicity seen in one-third of the patients. These symptoms significantly impact on patients' quality of life. Prospective studies with control groups are needed to elucidate long-term toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Bin Pan
- Sir Alan Parks Physiology Unit, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai, China
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- Sir Alan Parks Physiology Unit, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Unit of Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Van Cutsem E, Lesniewski-Kmak K, Saunders M, Wasan H, Argiles G, Borg C, Creemers GJ, Fedyanin M, Glynne-Jones R, Pfeiffer P, Punt C, Stroyakovskiy D, Ten Tije A, van de Wouw A, Cattan V, Desachy G, Amellal N, Moiseyenko V. Droplet digital PCR of circulating tumour DNA for the detection of RAS/BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy281.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
32
|
Rao S, Sclafani F, Eng C, Grønlie Guren M, Adams R, Benson A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Segelov E, Bryant A, Peckitt C, Roy A, Seymour M, Welch J, Saunders M, Muirhead R, Bridgewater J, Falk S, Glynne-Jones R, Arnold D, Cunningham D. InterAACT: A multicentre open label randomised phase II advanced anal cancer trial of cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs carboplatin (C) plus weekly paclitaxel (P) in patients (pts) with inoperable locally recurrent (ILR) or metastatic treatment naïve disease - An International Rare Cancers Initiative (IRCI) trial. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
33
|
Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rödel C, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:iv263. [PMID: 29741565 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
34
|
Glynne-Jones R, Hall M, Lopes A, Pearce S, Goh V, Bosompem S, Bridgewater J, Chau I, Wasan H, Moran B, Melcher L, West N, Quirke P, Wong WL, Beare S, Hava N, Duggan M, Harrison M. BACCHUS: A randomised non-comparative phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Heliyon 2018; 4:e00804. [PMID: 30258994 PMCID: PMC6151852 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) are standard treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We evaluated the efficacy/safety of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimens as an alternative prior to total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS/DESIGN This multi-centre, phase II trial in patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defined high-risk LARC (>cT3b, cN2+ or extramural venous invasion) randomised patients (1:1) to FOLFOX + Bevacizumab (Arm 1) or FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (Arm 2) every 14 days for 6 cycles prior to surgery. Patients were withdrawn if positron emission tomography (PET) standardised uptake value (SUV) after 3 cycles failed to decrease by >30% or increased compared to baseline. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AE) and toxicity. Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) scores based on "T" and "N" downstaging were calculated. FINDINGS Twenty patients aged 18-75 years were randomised. The trial stopped early because of poor accrual. Seventeen patients completed all 6 cycles of NACT. One stopped due to myocardial infarction, 1 poor response on PET (both received CRT) and 1 committed suicide. 11 patients had G3 AE, 1 G4 AE (neutropenia), and 1 G5 (suicide). pCR (the primary endpoint) was 0/10 for Arm 1 and 2/10 for Arm 2 i.e. 2/20 (10%) overall. Median NAR score was 14·9 with 5 (28%), 7 (39%), and 6 (33%) having low, intermediate, or high scores. Surgical morbidity was acceptable (1/18 wound infection, no anastomotic leak/pelvic sepsis/fistulae). The 24-month progression-free survival rate was 75% (95% CI: 60%-85%). INTERPRETATION The primary endpoint (pCR rate) was not met. However, FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab achieved promising pCR rates, low NAR scores and was well-tolerated. This regimen is suitable for testing as the novel arm against current standards of SCRT and/or CRT in a future trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - M.R. Hall
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - A. Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - S. Pearce
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - V. Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - S. Bosompem
- Pharmacy Department, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Trust, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - J. Bridgewater
- University College, London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley St., London, WC1E 6AA, UK
| | - I. Chau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Surrey, UK
| | - H. Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B. Moran
- Department of Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - L. Melcher
- Radiotherapy Department, North Middlesex Hospital, Sterling Way, London, N18 1QX, UK
| | - N.P. West
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - P. Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - W.-L. Wong
- Department of Radiology, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - S. Beare
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - N. Hava
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - M. Duggan
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - M. Harrison
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bujko K, Glynne-Jones R, Papamichael D, Rutten HJT. Optimal management of localized rectal cancer in older patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:696-704. [PMID: 30150020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In advising the optimal management for older patients, health care professionals try to balance the risks from frailty, vulnerability, and comorbidity against the patient's ultimate prognosis, potential functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL). At the same time it is important to involve the patient and incorporate their preferences. But how can we present and balance the potential downside of radical radiotherapy and risks of unsalvageable recurrence against the potential risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with radical surgery? There are currently no nationally approved and evidence-based guidelines available to ensure consistency in discussions with older adults or frail and vulnerable patients. In this overview we hope to provide an insightful discussion of the relevant issues and options currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Bujko
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Harm J T Rutten
- Catharina Hospital Cancer Center Eindhoven, GROW Scholl of oncology and developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jones CM, Adams R, Downing A, Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M, Hawkins M, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gilbert DC, Muirhead R. Toxicity, Tolerability, and Compliance of Concurrent Capecitabine or 5-Fluorouracil in Radical Management of Anal Cancer With Single-dose Mitomycin-C and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Evaluation of a National Cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:1202-1211. [PMID: 29859793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is established as the standard of care for the radical treatment of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). The use of the oral fluoropyrimidine-derivative capecitabine is emerging as an alternative to 5-FU despite limited evidence of its tolerability and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS A national cohort evaluation of ASCC management within the United Kingdom National Health Service was undertaken from February to July 2015. The toxicity rates were prospectively recorded. For the present analysis, we report data from ASCC patients who underwent intensity modulated RT and a single dose of MMC with either 5-FU (5-FU/MMC) or capecitabine (capecitabine/MMC). All were treated with radical intent and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered in accordance with UK guidance. RESULTS Of the 242 patients received from 40 centers across the United Kingdom, 147 met the inclusion criteria; 52 of whom were treated with capecitabine/MMC and 95 with 5-FU/MMC. No treatment-related deaths and no overall difference were found in the proportion of patients experiencing any grade ≥3 toxicity between the capecitabine and 5-FU groups (45% vs 55%; P = .35). However, significantly fewer patients in the capecitabine/MMC group experienced grade 3 hematologic toxicity (4% vs 27%; P = .001). A lower proportion of patients completed their planned chemotherapy course in the capecitabine cohort, although this did not reach statistical significance (81% vs 90%; P = .21). The median RT duration was 38 days (interquartile range 38-39) for both groups. No difference was found in the 1-year oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Capecitabine/MMC resulted in similar levels of grade 3/4 toxicity overall compared with 5-FU/MMC as CRT for ASCC, although differences were found in the patterns of observed toxicities, with less hematologic toxicity with capecitabine. Further studies of capecitabine/MMC are required to understand the acute toxicity profile and long-term oncologic outcomes of this combination with intensity modulated RT for ASCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Jones
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Adams
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Harrison
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Hawkins
- CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Muirhead
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kobiela J, Spychalski P, Marvaso G, Ciardo D, Dell'Acqua V, Kraja F, Błażyńska-Spychalska A, Łachiński AJ, Surgo A, Glynne-Jones R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Ablative stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 129:91-101. [PMID: 30097241 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SBRT is a novel modality in treatment for oligometastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review of results of SBRT in maintaining LC (local control) for CRC liver and lung oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS The review was performed according to PRISMA and PICO guidelines. Database search using keywords: stereotactic, colon, colorectal, cancer, sbrt, sabr returned 457 results. 15 were included in the study. Only cohorts with CRC histology and reported LC were included. RESULTS For liver LC rates ranged from 50% to 100% after 1 year and 32% to 91% after 2 years. BED range 40.5-262.5 Gy (Gray). For lung LC rates ranged from 62% to 92% after 1 one year and from 53% to 92% after 2 years. BED range 51.3-262.5 Gy. CONCLUSIONS SBRT of oligometastatic CRC offers high LC with low morbidity and toxicity. It requires more observational studies and randomized trials but available data on clinical efficacy is promising, however not yet matured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - P Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
| | - G Marvaso
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - D Ciardo
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - V Dell'Acqua
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - F Kraja
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre "Mother Theresa", Tirana, Albania
| | - A Błażyńska-Spychalska
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - A J Łachiński
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - A Surgo
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lesniewski-Kmak K, Moiseenko V, Saunders M, Wasan H, Argiles G, Borg C, Creemers G, Fedyanin M, Glynne-Jones R, Pfeiffer P, Punt C, Stroyakovskiy D, Ten Tije A, Van de Wouw A, Kanehisa A, Fougeray R, Busto NL, Amellal N, Van Cutsem E. Phase II study evaluating trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab and capecitabine + bevacizumab in first-line unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who are non-eligible for intensive therapy (TASCO1): Results of the primary analysis. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy149.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
39
|
Bhoday J, Glimelius B, Tait D, Glynne-Jones R, Adams R, Brown G. Session 4: What should we do for poor responders after chemoradiotherapy: bad biology or should the fight go on? Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 1:97-99. [PMID: 29878687 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Just over 50% of patients with advanced rectal cancer have a poor response to chemoradiotherapy with resultant poor outcomes. Professor Glimelius reviews the evidence base for defining such patients and the potential role, if any, of further treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bhoday
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | | | - D Tait
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - R Adams
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - G Brown
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Battersby NJ, Bouliotis G, Emmertsen KJ, Juul T, Glynne-Jones R, Branagan G, Christensen P, Laurberg S, Moran BJ. Development and external validation of a nomogram and online tool to predict bowel dysfunction following restorative rectal cancer resection: the POLARS score. Gut 2018; 67:688-696. [PMID: 28115491 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bowel dysfunction is common following a restorative rectal cancer resection, but symptom severity and the degree of quality of life impairment is highly variable. An internationally validated patient-reported outcome measure, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, now enables these symptoms to be measured. The study purpose was: (1) to develop a model that predicts postoperative bowel function; (2) externally validate the model and (3) incorporate these findings into a nomogram and online tool in order to individualise patient counselling and aid preoperative consent. DESIGN Patients more than 1 year after curative restorative anterior resection (UK, median 54 months; Denmark (DK), 56 months since surgery) were invited to complete The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 version3 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3), LARS and Wexner incontinence scores. Demographics, tumour characteristics, preoperative/postoperative treatment and surgical procedures were recorded. Using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, risk factors for bowel dysfunction were independently assessed by advanced linear regression shrinkage techniques for each dataset (UK:DK). RESULTS Patients in the development (UK, n=463) and validation (DK, n=938) datasets reported mean (SD) LARS scores of 26 (11) and 24 (11), respectively. Key predictive factors for LARS were: age (at surgery); tumour height, total versus partial mesorectal excision, stoma and preoperative radiotherapy, with satisfactory model calibration and a Mallow's Cp of 7.5 and 5.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Pre-Operative LARS score (POLARS) is the first nomogram and online tool to predict bowel dysfunction severity prior to anterior resection. Colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologist and nurse specialists may use POLARS to help patients understand their risk of bowel dysfunction and to preoperatively highlight patients who may require additional postoperative support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick J Battersby
- The Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.,Department of Colorectal and Peritoneal Malignancy Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - George Bouliotis
- Department of Clinical Statistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount-Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount-Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - Graham Branagan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
| | | | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brendan J Moran
- The Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.,Department of Colorectal and Peritoneal Malignancy Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dell'Acqua V, Kobiela J, Kraja F, Leonardi MC, Surgo A, Zerella MA, Arculeo S, Fodor C, Ricotti R, Zampino MG, Ravenda S, Spinoglio G, Biffi R, Bazani A, Luraschi R, Vigorito S, Spychalski P, Orecchia R, Glynne-Jones R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Genital marginal failures after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in squamous cell anal cancer: no higher risk with IMRT when compared to 3DCRT. Med Oncol 2018; 35:59. [PMID: 29594584 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1118-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is considered the preferred option in squamous cell canal cancer (SCAC), delivering high doses to tumor volumes while minimizing dose to surrounding normal tissues. IMRT has steep dose gradients, but the technique is more demanding as deep understanding of target structures is required. To evaluate genital marginal failure in a cohort of patients with non-metastatic SCAC treated either with IMRT or 3DCRT and concurrent chemotherapy, 117 patients with SCAC were evaluated: 64 and 53 patients were treated with IMRT and 3DCRT techniques, respectively. All patients underwent clinical and radiological examination during their follow-up. Tumor response was evaluated with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors v1.1 guideline on regular basis. All patients' data were analyzed, and patients with marginal failure were identified. Concomitant chemotherapy was administered in 97 and 77.4% of patients in the IMRT and 3DCRT groups, respectively. In the IMRT group, the median follow-up was 25 months (range 6-78). Progressive disease was registered in 15.6% of patients; infield recurrence, distant recurrence and both infield recurrence and distant recurrence were identified in 5, 4 and 1 patient, respectively. Two out of 64 patients (3.1%) had marginal failures, localized at vagina/recto-vaginal septum and left perineal region. In the 3DCRT group, the median follow-up was 71.3 months (range 6-194 months). Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) had marginal failures, localized at recto-vaginal septum and perigenital structures. The rate of marginal failures was comparable in IMRT and 3DCRT groups (χ2 test p = 0.85). In this series, the use of IMRT for the treatment of SCAC did not increase the rate of marginal failures offering improved dose conformity to the target. Dose constraints should be applied with caution-particularly in females with involvement of the vagina or the vaginal septum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Dell'Acqua
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - J Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - F Kraja
- Division of Oncology, University Hospital Centre "Mother Theresa", Tirana, Albania
| | - M C Leonardi
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| | - A Surgo
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - M A Zerella
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - S Arculeo
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - C Fodor
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Ricotti
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - M G Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - S Ravenda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - R Biffi
- Unit of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - A Bazani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - S Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - P Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - R Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Emile JF, Julié C, Le Malicot K, Lepage C, Tabernero J, Mini E, Folprecht G, Van Laethem JL, Dimet S, Boulagnon-Rombi C, Allard MA, Penault-Llorca F, Bennouna J, Laurent-Puig P, Taieb J, Thaler J, Greil R, Gaenzer J, Eisterer W, Tschmelitsch J, Keil F, Samonigg H, Zabernigg A, Schmid F, Steger G, Steinacher R, Andel J, Jagdt B, Lang A, Fridrik M, Függer R, Hofbauer F, Woell E, Geissler D, Lenauer A, Prager M, D'Haens G, Demolin G, Kerger J, Deboever G, Ghillebert G, Polus M, Van Cutsem E, Kalantari HR, Delaunoit T, Goeminne JC, Peeters M, Vergauwe P, Houbiers G, Humblet Y, Janssens J, Schrijvers D, Vanderstraeten E, Van Laethem JL, Vermorken J, Van Daele D, Ferrante M, Forget F, Hendlisz A, Yilmaz M, Nielsen SE, Vestermark L, Larsen J, Zawadi MA, Bouche O, Mineur L, Bennouna-Louridi J, Dourthe LM, Ychou M, Boucher E, Taieb J, Pezet D, Desseigne F, Ducreux M, Texereau P, Miglianico L, Rougier P, Fratte S, Levache CB, Merrouche Y, Ellis S, Locher C, Ramee JF, Garnier C, Viret F, Chauffert B, Cojean-Zelek I, Michel P, Lecaille C, Borel C, Seitz JF, Smith D, Lombard-Bohas C, Andre T, Gornet JM, Fein F, Coulon-Sfairi MA, Kaminsky MC, Lagasse JP, Luet D, Etienne PL, Gasmi M, Vanoli A, Nguyen S, Aparicio T, Perrier H, Stremsdoerfer N, Laplaige P, Arsene D, Auby D, Bedenne L, Coriat R, Denis B, Geoffroy P, Piot G, Becouarn Y, Bordes G, Deplanque G, Dupuis O, Fruge F, Guimbaud R, Lecomte T, Lledo G, Sobhani I, Asnacios A, Azzedine A, Desauw C, Galais MP, Gargot D, Lam YH, Abakar-Mahamat A, Berdah JF, Catteau S, Clavero-Fabri MC, Codoul JF, Legoux JL, Goldfain D, Guichard P, Verge DP, Provencal J, Vedrenne B, Brezault-Bonnet C, Cleau D, Desir JP, Fallik D, Garcia B, Gaspard MH, Genet D, Hartwig J, Krummel Y, Budnik TM, Palascak-Juif V, Randrianarivelo H, Rinaldi Y, Aleba A, Darut-Jouve A, de Gramont A, Hamon H, Wendehenne F, Matzdorff A, Stahl MK, Schepp W, Burk M, Mueller L, Folprecht G, Geissler M, Mantovani-Loeffler L, Hoehler T, Asperger W, Kroening H, von Weikersthal LF, Fuxius S, Groschek M, Meiler J, Trarbach T, Rauh J, Ziegenhagen N, Kretzschmar A, Graeven U, Nusch A, von Wichert G, Hofheinz RD, Kleber G, Schmidt KH, Vehling-Kaiser U, Baum C, Schuette J, Haag GM, Holtkamp W, Potenberg J, Reiber T, Schliesser G, Schmoll HJ, Schneider-Kappus W, Abenhardt W, Denzlinger C, Henning J, Marxsen B, Derigs HG, Lambertz H, Becker-Boost I, Caca K, Constantin C, Decker T, Eschenburg H, Gabius S, Hebart H, Hoffmeister A, Horst HA, Kremers S, Leithaeuser M, Mueller S, Wagner S, Daum S, Schlegel F, Stauch M, Heinemann V, Maiello E, Latini L, Zaniboni A, Amadori D, Aprile G, Barni S, Mattioli R, Martoni A, Passalacqua R, Nicolini M, Pasquini E, Rabbi C, Aitini E, Ravaioli A, Barone C, Biasco G, Tamberi S, Gambi A, Verusio C, Marzola M, Lelli G, Boni C, Cascinu S, Bidoli P, Vaghi M, Cruciani G, Di Costanzo F, Sobrero A, Mini E, Petrioli R, Aglietta M, Alabiso O, Capuzzo F, Falcone A, Corsi DC, Labianca R, Salvagni S, Chiara S, Ciuffreda L, Ferraù F, Giuliani F, Lonardi S, Gebbia N, Mantovani G, Sanches E, Mellidez JC, Santos P, Freire J, Sarmento C, Costa L, Pinto AM, Barroso S, Santo JE, Guedes F, Monteiro A, Sa A, Furtado I, Salazar R, Aguilar EA, Herrero FR, Tabernero J, Valera JS, Ayerbes MV, Batlle JF, Gil S, Esteve AA, Garcia-Giron C, Vivanco GL, Salvia AS, Orduña VA, Garcia RV, Gallego J, Sureda BM, Remon J, Safont Aguilera MJ, Nogueras LC, Merino BQ, Castro CG, de Prado PM, Pericay CP, Figueiras MC, Jordan IG, Gome Reina MJ, Garcia ALL, Garcia-Ramos AA, Cervantes A, Martos CF, Gaspar EM, Montero IC, Emperador PE, Carbonero AL, Castillo MG, Garcia TG, Lopez JG, Flores EG, Morales MG, Muñoz ML, Martín AL, Maurel J, Camara JC, Garcia RD, Salgado M, Busquier IH, Ruiz TC, Muñoa AL, Aliguer MN, de Taranco AVO, Ureña MM, Gaspa FL, Ponce JJ, Roig CB, Jimenez PV, Brotons AG, Rodriguez SA, Martinez JA, Ruiz LC, Ruiz MC, Bridgewater J, Glynne-Jones R, Tahir S, Hickish T, Cassidy J, Samuel L. Prospective validation of a lymphocyte infiltration prognostic test in stage III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX. Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
43
|
Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rödel C, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:iv22-iv40. [PMID: 28881920 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 932] [Impact Index Per Article: 133.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, London, UK
| | - L Wyrwicz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - E Tiret
- Department of Surgery, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris
- APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - G Brown
- Department of Radiology, The Imperial College and Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Cervantes
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Arnold
- Instituto CUF de Oncologia (I.C.O.), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rödel C, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017. [PMID: 28881920 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, London, UK
| | - L Wyrwicz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - E Tiret
- Department of Surgery, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris.,APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - G Brown
- Department of Radiology, The Imperial College and Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Cervantes
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Arnold
- Instituto CUF de Oncologia (I.C.O.), Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Carvalho C, Glynne-Jones R. Challenges behind proving efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e354-e363. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30346-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
46
|
Glynne-Jones R, Hall M, Pearce S, Bosompem S, Bridgewater J, Chau I, Wasan H, Moran B, Beare S, Lopes A, West N, Quirke P, Wong WL, Harrison M. BACCHUS: A randomised study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx261.355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
47
|
Glynne-Jones R, Hall M. PARP inhibitors and chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:389-390. [PMID: 28497749 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30051-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK.
| | - Marcia Hall
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Taylor SA, Mallett S, Miles A, Beare S, Bhatnagar G, Bridgewater J, Glynne-Jones R, Goh V, Groves AM, Janes SM, Koh DM, Morris S, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Padhani AR, Punwani S, Rockall AG, Halligan S. Streamlining staging of lung and colorectal cancer with whole body MRI; study protocols for two multicentre, non-randomised, single-arm, prospective diagnostic accuracy studies (Streamline C and Streamline L). BMC Cancer 2017; 17:299. [PMID: 28464835 PMCID: PMC5412056 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3281-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Rapid and accurate cancer staging following diagnosis underpins patient management, in particular the identification of distant metastatic disease. Current staging guidelines recommend sequential deployment of various imaging platforms such as computerised tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) which can be time and resource intensive and onerous for patients. Recent studies demonstrate that whole body magnetic resonance Imaging (WB-MRI) may stage cancer efficiently in a single visit, with potentially greater accuracy than current staging investigations. The Streamline trials aim to evaluate whether WB-MRI increases per patient detection of metastases in non-small cell lung and colorectal cancer compared to standard staging pathways. METHODS The Streamline trials are multicentre, non-randomised, single-arm, prospective diagnostic accuracy studies with a novel design to capture patient management decisions during staging pathways. The two trials recruit adult patients with proven or highly suspected new diagnosis of primary colorectal (Streamline C) or non-small cell lung cancer (Streamline L) referred for staging. Patients undergo WB-MRI in addition to standard staging investigations. Strict blinding protocols are enforced for those interpreting the imaging. A first major treatment decision is made by the multi-disciplinary team prior to WB-MRI revelation based on standard staging investigations only, then based on the WB-MRI and any additional tests precipitated by WB-MRI, and finally based on all available test results. The reference standard is derived by a multidisciplinary consensus panel who assess 12 months of follow-up data to adjudicate on the TNM stage at diagnosis. Health psychology assessment of patients' experiences of the cancer staging pathway will be undertaken via interviews and questionnaires. A cost (effectiveness) analysis of WB-MRI compared to standard staging pathways will be performed. DISCUSSION We describe a novel approach to radiologist and clinician blinding to ascertain the 'true' diagnostic accuracy of differing imaging pathways and discuss our approach to assessing the impact of WB-MRI on clinical decision making in real-time. The Streamline trials will compare WB-MRI and standard imaging pathways in the same patients, thereby informing the most accurate and efficient approach to staging. TRIAL REGISTRATION Streamline C ISRCTN43958015 (registered 25/7/2012). Streamline L ISRCTN50436483 (registered 31/7/2012).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart A. Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Sue Mallett
- School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Anne Miles
- Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX UK
| | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 4TJ UK
| | - Gauraang Bhatnagar
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - John Bridgewater
- UCL Cancer Institute, Paul O Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street London, London, WC1E 6DD UK
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, MIDDX, HA6 2RN UK
| | - Vicky Goh
- Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering Kings College London, St Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH UK
| | - Ashley M. Groves
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, Euston Rd, London, UK
| | - Sam M. Janes
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF UK
| | - Dow Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Steve Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Pl, Fitzrovia, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Alison Morton
- C/O National Cancer Research Institute, 407 St Johns Street, London, EC1V 4AD UK
| | - Neal Navani
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF UK
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospital, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG UK
| | - Alf Oliver
- C/O National Cancer Research Institute, 407 St Johns Street, London, EC1V 4AD UK
| | - Anwar R. Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Andrea G. Rockall
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd London, London, SW3 6JJ UK
- Division of Cancer and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, London, W12 ONN UK
| | - Steve Halligan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Hall
- Marcia Hall and Rob Glynne-Jones, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Marcia Hall and Rob Glynne-Jones, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Monahan KJ, Alsina D, Bach S, Buchanan J, Burn J, Clark S, Dawson P, De Souza B, Din FVN, Dolwani S, Dunlop MG, East J, Evans DG, Fearnhead N, Frayling IM, Glynne-Jones R, Hill J, Houlston R, Hull M, Lalloo F, Latchford A, Lishman S, Quirke P, Rees C, Rutter M, Sasieni P, Senapati A, Speake D, Thomas H, Tomlinson I. Urgent improvements needed to diagnose and manage Lynch syndrome. BMJ 2017; 356:j1388. [PMID: 28320700 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j1388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Monahan
- Family History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals NHS Trust; Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Dawson
- Association of Coloproctology for Great Britain and Ireland
| | | | | | - Sunil Dolwani
- Cardiff University and Welsh Association of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy
| | - Malcolm G Dunlop
- Colon Cancer Genetics Group and Academic Coloproctology, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine
| | | | | | - Nicola Fearnhead
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Hull
- University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Huw Thomas
- St Mark's Hospital, Imperial College London
| | | |
Collapse
|