1
|
Reitsam NG, Grosser B, Enke JS, Mueller W, Westwood A, West NP, Quirke P, Märkl B, Grabsch HI. Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA): a novel histopathologic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients and its association with the luminal tumour proportion. Transl Oncol 2024; 44:101913. [PMID: 38593584 PMCID: PMC11024380 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) is a novel prognostic histopathologic biomarker measured at the invasive front in haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained colon and gastric cancer resection specimens. The aim of the current study was to validate the prognostic relevance of SARIFA-status in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and investigate its association with the luminal proportion of tumour (PoT). METHODS We established the SARIFA-status in 164 CRC resection specimens. The relationship between SARIFA-status, clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and PoT was investigated. RESULTS SARIFA-status was positive in 22.6% of all CRCs. SARIFA-positivity was related to higher pT, pN, pTNM stage and high grade of differentiation. SARIFA-positivity was associated with shorter RFS independent of known prognostic factors analysing all CRCs (RFS: hazard ratio (HR) 2.6, p = 0.032, CSS: HR 2.4, p = 0.05) and shorter RFS and CSS analysing only rectal cancers. SARIFA-positivity, which was measured at the invasive front, was associated with PoT-low (p = 0.009), e.g., higher stroma content, and lower vessel density (p = 0.0059) measured at the luminal tumour surface. CONCLUSION Here, we validated the relationship between SARIFA-status and prognosis in CRC patients and provided first evidence for a potential prognostic relevance in the subgroup of rectal cancer patients. Interestingly, CRCs with different SARIFA-status also showed histological differences measurable at the luminal tumour surface. Further studies to better understand the relationship between high luminal intratumoural stroma content and absence of a stroma reaction at the invasive front (SARIFA-positivity) are warranted and may inform future treatment decisions in CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N G Reitsam
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - B Grosser
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - J S Enke
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - W Mueller
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Pathologie, Starnberg, Germany
| | - A Westwood
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's University, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's University, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's University, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - B Märkl
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - H I Grabsch
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's University, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caley LR, Wood HM, Bottomley D, Fuentes Balaguer A, Wilkinson L, Dyson J, Young C, White H, Benton S, Brearley M, Quirke P, Peckham DG. The gut microbiota in adults with cystic fibrosis compared to colorectal cancer. J Cyst Fibros 2023:S1569-1993(23)01728-9. [PMID: 38104000 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gut dysbiosis is implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is associated with both gut dysbiosis and increased CRC risk. We therefore compared the faecal microbiota from individuals with CF to CRC and screening samples. We also assessed changes in CRC-associated taxa before and after triple CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy. METHODS Bacterial DNA amplification comprising V4 16S rRNA analysis was conducted on 84 baseline and 53 matched follow-up stool samples from adults with CF. These data were compared to an existing cohort of 430 CRC and 491 control gFOBT samples from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Data were also compared to 26 previously identified CRC-associated taxa from a published meta-analysis. RESULTS Faecal CF samples had a lower alpha diversity and clustered distinctly from both CRC and control samples, with no clear clinical variables explaining the variation. Compared to controls, CF samples had an increased relative abundance in 6 of the 20 enriched CRC-associated taxa and depletion of 2 of the 6 taxa which have been reported as reduced in CRC. Commencing triple modulator therapy had subtle influence on the relative abundance of CRC-associated microbiota (n = 23 paired CF samples). CONCLUSIONS CF stool samples were clearly dysbiotic, clustering distinctly from both CRC and control samples. Several bacterial shifts in CF samples resembled those observed in CRC. Studies assessing the impact of dietary or other interventions and the longer-term use of CFTR modulators on reducing this potentially pro-oncogenic milieu are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Caley
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Clinical Sciences Building, St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - H M Wood
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Bottomley
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Fuentes Balaguer
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - L Wilkinson
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - J Dyson
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - C Young
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - H White
- Leeds Beckett University, Nutrition, Health & Environment, Leeds, LS1 3HE UK
| | - S Benton
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GU2 7YS, UK
| | - M Brearley
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening South of England Hub, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GU2 7YS, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D G Peckham
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Clinical Sciences Building, St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hassanieh S, Domingo E, Blake A, Fisher D, Redmond K, Richman S, Walker S, Quirke P, Wilson R, Kennedy R, Tomlinson I, Kaplan R, L. brown, Dunne P, Seymour M, Morton D, Adams R, West N, Maughan T. 337P Prediction of poor response to oxaliplatin by an RNA signature derived and validated in colorectal cancer clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
4
|
Echle A, Ghaffari Laleh N, Quirke P, Grabsch HI, Muti HS, Saldanha OL, Brockmoeller SF, van den Brandt PA, Hutchins GGA, Richman SD, Horisberger K, Galata C, Ebert MP, Eckardt M, Boutros M, Horst D, Reissfelder C, Alwers E, Brinker TJ, Langer R, Jenniskens JCA, Offermans K, Mueller W, Gray R, Gruber SB, Greenson JK, Rennert G, Bonner JD, Schmolze D, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H, Trautwein C, Boor P, Jaeger D, Gaisa NT, Hoffmeister M, West NP, Kather JN. Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100400. [PMID: 35247870 PMCID: PMC9058894 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a key genetic feature which should be tested in every patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to medical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods can detect MSI/dMMR directly in routine pathology slides, but the test performance has not been systematically investigated with predefined test thresholds. METHOD We trained and validated AI-based MSI/dMMR detectors and evaluated predefined performance metrics using nine patient cohorts of 8343 patients across different countries and ethnicities. RESULTS Classifiers achieved clinical-grade performance, yielding an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of up to 0.96 without using any manual annotations. Subsequently, we show that the AI system can be applied as a rule-out test: by using cohort-specific thresholds, on average 52.73% of tumors in each surgical cohort [total number of MSI/dMMR = 1020, microsatellite stable (MSS)/ proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) = 7323 patients] could be identified as MSS/pMMR with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. In an additional cohort of N = 1530 (MSI/dMMR = 211, MSS/pMMR = 1319) endoscopy biopsy samples, the system achieved an AUROC of 0.89, and the cohort-specific threshold ruled out 44.12% of tumors with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. As a more robust alternative to cohort-specific thresholds, we showed that with a fixed threshold of 0.25 for all the cohorts, we can rule-out 25.51% in surgical specimens and 6.10% in biopsies. INTERPRETATION When applied in a clinical setting, this means that the AI system can rule out MSI/dMMR in a quarter (with global thresholds) or half of all CRC patients (with local fine-tuning), thereby reducing cost and turnaround time for molecular profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Echle
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - N Ghaffari Laleh
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Quirke
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - H I Grabsch
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H S Muti
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - O L Saldanha
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S F Brockmoeller
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P A van den Brandt
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - G G A Hutchins
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S D Richman
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K Horisberger
- Department of Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Galata
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Academic Thoracic Center Mainz, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - M P Ebert
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Institute for Innate Immunoscience (MI3) and Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center of Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Mannheim Cancer Center, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Eckardt
- Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Boutros
- Division of Signaling and Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Horst
- Institut für Pathologie Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - E Alwers
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Langer
- Institute of Pathology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - J C A Jenniskens
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - K Offermans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Mueller
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Pathologie, Starnberg, Germany
| | - R Gray
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S B Gruber
- Center for Precision Medicine and Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - J K Greenson
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA
| | - G Rennert
- Department of Community Medicine & Epidemiology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - J D Bonner
- Center for Precision Medicine and Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - D Schmolze
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA
| | - J Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Trautwein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Boor
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Nephrology and Immunology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - D Jaeger
- Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N T Gaisa
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N P West
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J N Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seligmann J, Fisher D, Brown L, Adams R, Graham J, Quirke P, Richman S, Butler R, Domingo E, Blake A, Braun M, Collinson F, Jones R, Brown E, De Winton E, Humphies T, Kaplan R, Wilson R, Seymour M, Maughan T. 382O Inhibition of WEE1 is effective in TP53 and RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A randomised phase II trial (FOCUS4-C) comparing adavosertib (AZD1775) with active monitoring. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
6
|
Seppälä TT, Latchford A, Negoi I, Sampaio Soares A, Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Sánchez-Guillén L, Evans DG, Ryan N, Crosbie EJ, Dominguez-Valentin M, Burn J, Kloor M, Knebel Doeberitz MV, Duijnhoven FJBV, Quirke P, Sampson JR, Møller P, Möslein G. European guidelines from the EHTG and ESCP for Lynch syndrome: an updated third edition of the Mallorca guidelines based on gene and gender. Br J Surg 2021; 108:484-498. [PMID: 34043773 PMCID: PMC10364896 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer but remains underdiagnosed. Large prospective observational studies have recently increased understanding of the effectiveness of colonoscopic surveillance and the heterogeneity of cancer risk between genotypes. The need for gene- and gender-specific guidelines has been acknowledged. METHODS The European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) developed a multidisciplinary working group consisting of surgeons, clinical and molecular geneticists, pathologists, epidemiologists, gastroenterologists, and patient representation to conduct a graded evidence review. The previous Mallorca guideline format was used to revise the clinical guidance. Consensus for the guidance statements was acquired by three Delphi voting rounds. RESULTS Recommendations for clinical and molecular identification of Lynch syndrome, surgical and endoscopic management of Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer, and preventive measures for cancer were produced. The emphasis was on surgical and gastroenterological aspects of the cancer spectrum. Manchester consensus guidelines for gynaecological management were endorsed. Executive and layperson summaries were provided. CONCLUSION The recommendations from the EHTG and ESCP for identification of patients with Lynch syndrome, colorectal surveillance, surgical management of colorectal cancer, lifestyle and chemoprevention in Lynch syndrome that reached a consensus (at least 80 per cent) are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T T Seppälä
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore Maryland, USA
| | - A Latchford
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, UK.,St Mark's Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - I Negoi
- Department of Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - R Jimenez-Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - L Sánchez-Guillén
- Colorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University General Hospital Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - N Ryan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - E J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - M Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumour Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Burn
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F J B van Duijnhoven
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J R Sampson
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| | - P Møller
- Department of Tumour Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - G Möslein
- Centre for Hereditary Tumours, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany.,University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, Laurent-Puig P, Quirke P, Yoshino T, Taieb J, Martinelli E, Arnold D. Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1291-1305. [PMID: 32702383 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 510] [Impact Index Per Article: 127.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Argilés
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVic-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Labianca
- Department Oncology, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - R Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Iveson
- University Hospital Southampton, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - P Laurent-Puig
- Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris University, Paris, France; INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T Yoshino
- National Cancer Centre Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - J Taieb
- Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris University, Paris, France; INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France; Department of Gastroenterology and GI Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - E Martinelli
- Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Department of Precision Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seligmann JF, Elliott F, Richman S, Hemmings G, Brown S, Jacobs B, Williams C, Tejpar S, Barrett JH, Quirke P, Seymour M. Clinical and molecular characteristics and treatment outcomes of advanced right-colon, left-colon and rectal cancers: data from 1180 patients in a phase III trial of panitumumab with an extended biomarker panel. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1021-1029. [PMID: 32387453 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary tumour location (PTL) is being adopted by clinicians to guide treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here we test PTL as a predictive marker for panitumumab efficacy, and examine its relationship with an extended biomarker profile. We also examine rectal tumours as a separate location. PATIENTS AND METHODS mCRC patients from the second-line PICCOLO trial of irinotecan versus irinotecan/panitumumab (IrPan). PTL was classified as right-PTL, left-PTL or rectal-PTL. PTL was assessed as a predictive biomarker for IrPan effect in RAS-wild-type (RAS-wt) patients (compared with irinotecan alone), then tested for independence alongside an extended biomarker profile (BRAF, epiregulin/amphiregulin (EREG/AREG) and HER3 mRNA expression). RESULTS PTL data were available for 1180 patients (98.5%), of whom 558 were RAS-wt. High HER3 expression was independently predictive of panitumumab overall survival improvement, but PTL and EREG/AREG were not. IrPan progression-free survival (PFS) improvement compared with irinotecan was seen in left-PTL [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, P = 0.002) but not right-PTL (HR = 0.98, P = 0.90) (interaction P = 0.05; RAS/BRAF-wt interaction P = 0.10), or in rectal-PTL (HR = 0.82, P = 0.20) (interaction P = 0.14 compared with left-PTL; RAS/BRAF-wt interaction P = 0.04). Patients with right-PTL and high EREG/AREG or HER3 expression, had IrPan PFS improvement (high EREG/AREG HR = 0.20, P = 0.04; high HER3 HR = 0.33, P = 0.10) compared with irinotecan. Similar effect was seen for rectal-PTL patients (high EREG/AREG HR = 0.44, P = 0.03; high HER3 HR = 0.34, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS RAS-wt patients with left-PTL are more likely to have panitumumab PFS advantage than those with right-PTL or rectal-PTL. However, an extended biomarker panel demonstrated significant heterogeneity in panitumumab PFS effect within a tumour location. AREG/EREG and HER3 mRNA expression identifies patients with right-PTL or rectal-PTL who achieve similar PFS effect with panitumumab as left-colon patients. Testing could provide a more reliable basis for clinical decision making. Further validation and development of these biomarkers is required to optimise routine patient care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN identifier: ISRCTN93248876.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Seligmann
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - F Elliott
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Richman
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G Hemmings
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - B Jacobs
- Molecular Digestive Oncology Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Williams
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Tejpar
- Molecular Digestive Oncology Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J H Barrett
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M Seymour
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D'Souza N, Lord AC, Shaw A, Patel A, Balyasnikova S, Tudyka V, Abulafi M, Moran B, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Coffey JC, Terlizzo M, West NP, Quirke P, Brown G. Ex vivo specimen MRI and pathology confirm a rectosigmoid mesenteric waist at the junction of the mesorectum and mesocolon. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:212-218. [PMID: 31535423 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Continuity of the mesentery has recently been established and may provide an anatomical basis for optimal colorectal resectional surgery. Preliminary data from operative specimen measurements suggest there is a tapering in the mesentery of the distal sigmoid. A mesenteric waist in this area may be a risk factor for local recurrence of colorectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of the mesentery at the colorectal junction. METHOD In this cross-sectional study, 20 patients were recruited. After planned colorectal resection, the surgical specimens were scanned in a MRI system and subsequently dissected and photographed as per national pathology guidelines. Mesenteric surface area and linear measurements were compared between MRI and pathology to establish the presence and location of a mesenteric waist. RESULTS Specimen analysis confirmed that a narrowing in the mesenteric surface area was consistently apparent at the rectosigmoid junction. Above the anterior peritoneal reflection, the surface area and posterior distance of the mesentery of the upper rectum initially decreased before increasing as the mesentery of the sigmoid colon. These anatomical properties created the appearance of a mesenteric 'waist' at the rectosigmoid junction. Using the anterior reflection as a reference landmark, the rectosigmoid waist occurred at a mean height of 23.6 and 21.7 mm on MRI and pathology, respectively. CONCLUSION A rectosigmoid waist occurs at the junction of the mesorectum and mesocolon, and is a mesenteric landmark for the rectum that is present on both radiology and pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N D'Souza
- Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK.,Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A C Lord
- Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK.,Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Shaw
- Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK.,Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Patel
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - S Balyasnikova
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - M Abulafi
- Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - B Moran
- Basingstoke Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - S Rasheed
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Tekkis
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J C Coffey
- University Hospital Limerick and University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - N P West
- Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G Brown
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
West N, Murakami K, Magill L, Gray R, Handley K, Seymour M, Morton D, Quirke P. Pre-operative FOLFOX chemotherapy in advanced colon cancer: Pathology analysis of the FOxTROT trial. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
11
|
Brown PJ, Rossington H, Taylor J, Lambregts DMJ, Morris EJA, West NP, Quirke P, Tolan D. Radiologist and multidisciplinary team clinician opinions on the quality of MRI rectal cancer staging reports: how are we doing? Clin Radiol 2019; 74:637-642. [PMID: 31084973 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the current opinion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports amongst specialist clinicians involved in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary teams (CRC MDTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Active participants at 16 UK CRC MDTs across a population of 5.7 million were invited to complete a questionnaire, this included 22 closed and three open questions. Closed questions used ordinal (Likert) scales to judge the subjective inclusion of tumour descriptors and impressions on the clarity and consistency of the MRI report. Open (free-text) questions allowed overall feedback and suggestions. RESULTS A total of 69 participants completed the survey (21 radiologists and 48 other CRC MDT clinicians). Both groups highlighted that reports commonly omit the status of the circumferential resection margin (CRM; 83% versus 81% inclusion, other clinicians and radiologists, respectively, p>0.05), presence or absence of extra-mural venous invasion (EMVI; 67% versus 57% inclusion, p>0.05), and lymph node status (90% inclusion in both groups). Intra-radiologist agreement across MRI examinations is reported as 75% by other clinicians. Free-text comments included suggestions for template-style reports. CONCLUSION Both groups recognise a proportion of MRI reports are suboptimal with key tumour descriptors omitted. There are also concerns around the presentation style of MRI reports and inter- and intra-radiologist report variability. The widespread implementation of standardised report templates may improve completeness and clarity of MRI reports for rectal cancer and thus clinical management and outcomes in rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - H Rossington
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - J Taylor
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E J A Morris
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology, Section of Pathology and Data Analytics, Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - D Tolan
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Lincoln Wing, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marks KM, West NP, Morris E, Quirke P. Clinicopathological, genomic and immunological factors in colorectal cancer prognosis. Br J Surg 2018; 105:e99-e109. [PMID: 29341159 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous factors affect the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), many of which have long been identified, such as patient demographics and the multidisciplinary team. In more recent years, molecular and immunological biomarkers have been shown to have a significant influence on patient outcomes. Whilst some of these biomarkers still require ongoing validation, if proven to be worthwhile they may change our understanding and future management of CRC. The aim of this review was to identify the key prognosticators of CRC, including new molecular and immunological biomarkers, and outline how these might fit into the whole wider context for patients. METHODS Relevant references were identified through keyword searches of PubMed and Embase Ovid SP databases. RESULTS In recent years there have been numerous studies outlining molecular markers of prognosis in CRC. In particular, the Immunoscore® has been shown to hold strong prognostic value. Other molecular biomarkers are useful in guiding treatment decisions, such as mutation testing of genes in the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. However, epidemiological studies continue to show that patient demographics are fundamental in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSION Current strategies for managing CRC are strongly dependent on clinicopathological staging, although molecular testing is increasingly being implemented into routine clinical practice. As immunological biomarkers are further validated, their testing may also become routine. To obtain clinically useful information from new biomarkers, it is important to implement them into a model that includes all underlying fundamental factors, as this will enable the best possible outcomes and deliver true precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Marks
- Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - E Morris
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Glynne-Jones R, Hall M, Lopes A, Pearce S, Goh V, Bosompem S, Bridgewater J, Chau I, Wasan H, Moran B, Melcher L, West N, Quirke P, Wong WL, Beare S, Hava N, Duggan M, Harrison M. BACCHUS: A randomised non-comparative phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Heliyon 2018; 4:e00804. [PMID: 30258994 PMCID: PMC6151852 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) are standard treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We evaluated the efficacy/safety of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimens as an alternative prior to total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS/DESIGN This multi-centre, phase II trial in patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defined high-risk LARC (>cT3b, cN2+ or extramural venous invasion) randomised patients (1:1) to FOLFOX + Bevacizumab (Arm 1) or FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (Arm 2) every 14 days for 6 cycles prior to surgery. Patients were withdrawn if positron emission tomography (PET) standardised uptake value (SUV) after 3 cycles failed to decrease by >30% or increased compared to baseline. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AE) and toxicity. Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) scores based on "T" and "N" downstaging were calculated. FINDINGS Twenty patients aged 18-75 years were randomised. The trial stopped early because of poor accrual. Seventeen patients completed all 6 cycles of NACT. One stopped due to myocardial infarction, 1 poor response on PET (both received CRT) and 1 committed suicide. 11 patients had G3 AE, 1 G4 AE (neutropenia), and 1 G5 (suicide). pCR (the primary endpoint) was 0/10 for Arm 1 and 2/10 for Arm 2 i.e. 2/20 (10%) overall. Median NAR score was 14·9 with 5 (28%), 7 (39%), and 6 (33%) having low, intermediate, or high scores. Surgical morbidity was acceptable (1/18 wound infection, no anastomotic leak/pelvic sepsis/fistulae). The 24-month progression-free survival rate was 75% (95% CI: 60%-85%). INTERPRETATION The primary endpoint (pCR rate) was not met. However, FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab achieved promising pCR rates, low NAR scores and was well-tolerated. This regimen is suitable for testing as the novel arm against current standards of SCRT and/or CRT in a future trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - M.R. Hall
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - A. Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - S. Pearce
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - V. Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - S. Bosompem
- Pharmacy Department, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Trust, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
| | - J. Bridgewater
- University College, London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley St., London, WC1E 6AA, UK
| | - I. Chau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Surrey, UK
| | - H. Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B. Moran
- Department of Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - L. Melcher
- Radiotherapy Department, North Middlesex Hospital, Sterling Way, London, N18 1QX, UK
| | - N.P. West
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - P. Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - W.-L. Wong
- Department of Radiology, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - S. Beare
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - N. Hava
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - M. Duggan
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - M. Harrison
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Armstrong G, Croft J, Corrigan N, Brown JM, Goh V, Quirke P, Hulme C, Tolan D, Kirby A, Cahill R, O'Connell PR, Miskovic D, Coleman M, Jayne D. IntAct: intra-operative fluorescence angiography to prevent anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:O226-O234. [PMID: 29751360 PMCID: PMC6099475 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Anastomotic leak (AL) is a major complication of rectal cancer surgery. Despite advances in surgical practice, the rates of AL have remained static, at around 10-15%. The aetiology of AL is multifactorial, but one of the most crucial risk factors, which is mostly under the control of the surgeon, is blood supply to the anastomosis. The MRC/NIHR IntAct study will determine whether assessment of anastomotic perfusion using a fluorescent dye (indocyanine green) and near-infrared laparoscopy can minimize the rate of AL leak compared with conventional white-light laparoscopy. Two mechanistic sub-studies will explore the role of the rectal microbiome in AL and the predictive value of CT angiography/perfusion studies. METHOD IntAct is a prospective, unblinded, parallel-group, multicentre, European, randomized controlled trial comparing surgery with intra-operative fluorescence angiography (IFA) against standard care (surgery with no IFA). The primary end-point is rate of clinical AL at 90 days following surgery. Secondary end-points include all AL (clinical and radiological), change in planned anastomosis, complications and re-interventions, use of stoma, cost-effectiveness of the intervention and quality of life. Patients should have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum suitable for potentially curative surgery by anterior resection. Over 3 years, 880 patients from 25 European centres will be recruited and followed up for 90 days. DISCUSSION IntAct will rigorously evaluate the use of IFA in rectal cancer surgery and explore the role of the microbiome in AL and the predictive value of preoperative CT angiography/perfusion scanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J. Croft
- Clinical Trials Research UnitLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials ResearchUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - N. Corrigan
- Clinical Trials Research UnitLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials ResearchUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - J. M. Brown
- Clinical Trials Research UnitLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials ResearchUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - V. Goh
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging SciencesKing's College London and Honorary Consultant RadiologistGuy's and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - C. Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health EconomicsLeeds Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - D. Tolan
- Leeds Teaching Hospital TrustLeedsUK
| | | | - R. Cahill
- University College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | | | - M. Coleman
- Derriford HospitalPlymouth NHS TrustPlymouthUK
| | - D. Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Biological and Clinical SciencesSt James's University HospitalLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
A careful overview of the classical appearances of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) as well as of its variants were reviewed from the clinical and pathological point of view. The growth phases (stages) and the cellular patterns were histopathologically compared with emphasis on the developmental progression of disease as well as mitotic activity. Other morphological aspects were also assessed such as the features of the early phases and the incidence of hyaline bodies. One hundred and forty-three lesions from 96 patients mostly of the Italian sporadic type were investigated. A complete list of those entities which should be considered in differential diagnosis is shown and the dilemma of whether KS is a neoplasia or a hyperplasia is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bisceglia
- Anatomic Pathology Department, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cure a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.), S. Giovanni Rotondo Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sheehan-Dare GE, Marks KM, Tinkler-Hundal E, Ingeholm P, Bertelsen CA, Quirke P, West NP. The effect of a multidisciplinary regional educational programme on the quality of colon cancer resection. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:105-115. [PMID: 28755446 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Mesocolic plane surgery with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen following colon cancer resection and appears to be related to optimal outcomes. We aimed to assess whether a regional educational programme in optimal mesocolic surgery led to an improvement in the quality of specimens. METHOD Following an educational programme in the Capital and Zealand areas of Denmark, 686 cases of primary colon cancer resected across six hospitals were assessed by grading the plane of surgery and undertaking tissue morphometry. These were compared to 263 specimens resected prior to the educational programme. RESULTS Across the region, the mesocolic plane rate improved from 58% to 77% (P < 0.001). One hospital had previously implemented optimal surgery as standard prior to the educational programme and continued to produce a high rate of mesocolic plane specimens (68%) with a greater distance between the tumour and the high tie (median for all fresh cases: 113 vs 82 mm) and lymph node yield (33 vs 18) compared to the other hospitals. Three of the other hospitals showed a significant improvement in the plane of surgical resection. CONCLUSION A multidisciplinary regional educational programme in optimal mesocolic surgery improved the oncological quality of colon cancer specimens as assessed by mesocolic planes; however, there was no significant effect on the amount of tissue resected centrally. Surgeons who attempt central vascular ligation continue to produce more radical specimens suggesting that such educational programmes alone are not sufficient to increase the amount of tissue resected around the tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G E Sheehan-Dare
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - K M Marks
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - E Tinkler-Hundal
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - P Ingeholm
- Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - C A Bertelsen
- Department of Surgery, Hillerød University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stelzner S, Böttner M, Kupsch J, Kneist W, Quirke P, West NP, Witzigmann H, Wedel T. Internal anal sphincter nerves - a macroanatomical and microscopic description of the extrinsic autonomic nerve supply of the internal anal sphincter. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:O7-O16. [PMID: 29068554 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM The internal anal sphincter (IAS) contributes substantially to anorectal functions. While its autonomic nerve supply has been studied at the microscopic level, little information is available concerning the macroscopic topography of extrinsic nerve fibres. This study was designed to identify neural connections between the pelvic plexus and the IAS, provide a detailed topographical description, and give histological proof of autonomic nerve tissue. METHODS Macroscopic dissection of pelvic autonomic nerves was performed under magnification in seven (five male, two female) hemipelvises obtained from body donors (67-92 years). Candidate structures were investigated by histological and immunohistochemical staining protocols to visualize nerve tissue. RESULTS Nerve fibres could be traced from the anteroinferior edge of the pelvic plexus to the anorectal junction running along the neurovascular bundle anterolaterally to the rectum and posterolaterally to the prostate/vagina. Nerve fibres penetrated the longitudinal rectal muscle layer just above the fusion with the levator ani muscle (conjoint longitudinal muscle) and entered the intersphincteric space to reach the IAS. Histological and immunohistochemical findings confirmed the presence of nerve tissue. CONCLUSIONS Autonomic nerve fibres supplying the IAS emerge from the pelvic plexus and are distinct to nerves entering the rectum via the lateral pedicles. Thus, they should be classified as IAS nerves. The identification and precise topographical location described provides a basis for nerve-sparing rectal resection procedures and helps to prevent postoperative functional anorectal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stelzner
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Dresden-Friedrichstadt General Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Böttner
- Institute of Anatomy, Center of Clinical Anatomy, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - J Kupsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Dresden-Friedrichstadt General Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - W Kneist
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - H Witzigmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Dresden-Friedrichstadt General Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - T Wedel
- Institute of Anatomy, Center of Clinical Anatomy, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sclafani F, Gollins S, Cunningham D, Hulkki Wilson S, Kouvelakis K, Lopes A, West N, Quirke P, Begum R, Valeri N, Beare S, Hughes L, Gonzalez De Castro D, Chau I. FCγRIIa and FCγRIIIa single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and cetuximab benefit in the EXCITE trial. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx659.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
19
|
Seligmann J, Wood H, Richman S, Elliott F, Taylor M, Tinkler-Hundal E, Barrett J, Seymour M, Quirke P. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number (CN) as a biomarker of prognosis and panitumumab (Pan) benefit in RAS-wt advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx393.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
20
|
Seligmann JF, Fisher D, Smith CG, Richman SD, Elliott F, Brown S, Adams R, Maughan T, Quirke P, Cheadle J, Seymour M, Middleton G. Investigating the poor outcomes of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer: analysis from 2530 patients in randomised clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:562-568. [PMID: 27993800 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To improve strategies for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) patients, we examined individual data from patients treated with chemotherapy alone in three randomised trials to identify points on the treatment pathway where outcomes differ from BRAF wild-types. Patients and methods 2530 aCRC patients were assessed from three randomised trials. End-points were progression-free survival, response rate, disease control rate, post-progression survival (P-PS) and overall survival. Treatments included first-line oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (OxFU) and second-line irinotecan. Clinicians were unaware of BRAF-status. Results 231 patients (9.1%) had BRAF-mutant tumours. BRAF-mutation conferred significantly worse survival independent of associated clinicopathological factors known to be prognostic. Compared with wild-type, BRAF-mutant patients treated with first-line OxFU had similar DCR (59.2% versus 72%; adjusted OR = 0.76, P = 0.24) and PFS (5.7 versus 6.3 months; adjusted HR = 1.14, P = 0.26). Following progression on first-line chemotherapy, BRAF-mutant patients had a markedly shorter P-PS (4.2 versus 9.2 months, adjusted HR = 1.69, P < 0.001). Fewer BRAF-mutant patients received second-line treatment (33% versus 51%, P < 0.001), but BRAF-mutation was not associated with inferior second-line outcomes (RR adjusted OR = 0.56, P = 0.45; PFS adjusted HR = 1.01, P = 0.93). Significant clinical heterogeneity within the BRAF-mutant population was observed: a proportion (24.3%) had good first-line PFS and P-PS (both >6 months; OS = 24.0 months); however, 36.5% progressed rapidly through first-line chemotherapy and thereafter, with OS = 4.7 months. Conclusions BRAF-mutant aCRC confers a markedly worse prognosis independent of associated clinicopathological features. Chemotherapy provides meaningful improvements in outcome throughout treatment lines. Post-progression survival is markedly worse and vigilance is required to ensure appropriate delivery of treatment after first-line progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Seligmann
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - D Fisher
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - C G Smith
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - S D Richman
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - F Elliott
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - S Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R Adams
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - T Maughan
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - J Cheadle
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - M Seymour
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - G Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham and University Hospital Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Adams R, Brown E, Brown L, Butler R, Falk S, Fisher D, Kaplan R, Quirke P, Richman S, Samuel L, Seligmann J, Seymour M, Shiu K, Wasan H, Wilson R, Maughan T. FOCUS4-D: Results from a randomised, placebo controlled trial (RCT) of AZD8931 (an inhibitor of signalling by HER1, 2, and 3) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (aCRC) in tumours that are wildtype (wt) for BRAF, PIK3CA, KRAS & NRAS. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw370.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
22
|
Morris EJA, Finan PJ, Spencer K, Geh I, Crellin A, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Lawton S, Adams R, Sebag-Montefiore D. Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016; 28:522-531. [PMID: 26936609 PMCID: PMC4944647 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. It is delivered both in the neoadjuvant setting and postoperatively, but, although it reduces local recurrence, it does not influence overall survival and increases the risk of long-term complications. This has led to a variety of international practice patterns. These variations can have a significant effect on commissioning, but also future clinical research. This study explores its use within the large English National Health Service (NHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Information on all individuals diagnosed with a surgically treated rectal cancer between April 2009 and December 2010 were extracted from the Radiotherapy Dataset linked to the National Cancer Data Repository. Individuals were grouped into those receiving no radiotherapy, short-course radiotherapy with immediate surgery (SCRT-I), short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery (SCRT-D), long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), other radiotherapy (ORT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Patterns of use were then investigated. RESULTS The study consisted of 9201 individuals; 4585 (49.3%) received some form of radiotherapy. SCRT-I was used in 12.1%, SCRT-D in 1.2%, LCCRT in 29.5%, ORT in 4.7% and PORT in 2.3%. Radiotherapy was used more commonly in men and in those receiving an abdominoperineal excision and less commonly in the elderly and those with comorbidity. Significant and substantial variations were also seen in its use across all the multidisciplinary teams managing this disease. CONCLUSION Despite the same evidence base, wide variation exists in both the use of and type of radiotherapy delivered in the management of rectal cancer across the English NHS. Prospective population-based collection of local recurrence and patient-reported early and late toxicity information is required to further improve patient selection for preoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J A Morris
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | - P J Finan
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; National Cancer Intelligence Network, London, UK
| | - K Spencer
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Non-Surgical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - I Geh
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Crellin
- Non-Surgical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - J D Thomas
- National Cancer Registration Service, Northern and Yorkshire Office, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - S Lawton
- Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R Adams
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Section of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kraima AC, West NP, Treanor D, Magee D, Roberts N, van de Velde CJH, DeRuiter MC, Quirke P, Rutten HJT. The anatomy of the perineal body in relation to abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:688-95. [PMID: 26407538 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Dissection of the perineal body (PB) during abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal cancer is often difficult due to the lack of a natural plane of dissection. Understanding the PB and its relation to the anorectum is essential to permit safe dissection during the perineal phase of the operation and avoid damage to the anorectum and urogenital organs. This study describes the anatomy and histology of the PB relevant to APE. METHOD Six human adult cadaver pelvic exenteration specimens (three male, three female) from the Leeds GIFT Research Tissue Programme were studied. Paraffin-embedded mega-blocks were produced and serially sectioned at 50- and 250-μm intervals. Sections were stained by immunohistochemistry to show collagen, elastin and smooth muscle. RESULTS The PB was cylindrically shaped in the male specimens and wedge-shaped in the female ones. Although centrally located between the anal and urogenital triangles, it was nearly completely formed by muscle fibres derived from the rectal muscularis propria. Thick bundles of smooth muscle, mostly arising from the longitudinal muscle, inserted into the PB and levator ani muscle (LAM). The recto-urethralis muscle originated from the PB and separated the anterolateral PB from the urogenital organs. CONCLUSION Smooth muscle fibres derived from the rectal muscularis propria extend into the PB and LAM and appear to fix the anorectum. Dissection of the PB during APE is safe only when the smooth muscle fibres that extend into the PB are divided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Kraima
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Treanor
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Magee
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N Roberts
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M C DeRuiter
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Glynne-Jones R, Hava N, Goh V, Bosompem S, Bridgewater J, Chau I, Gaya A, Wasan H, Moran B, Melcher L, MacDonald A, Osborne M, Beare S, Jitlal M, Lopes A, Hall M, West N, Quirke P, Wong WL, Harrison M. Bevacizumab and Combination Chemotherapy in rectal cancer Until Surgery (BACCHUS): a phase II, multicentre, open-label, randomised study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with high-risk cancer of the rectum. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:764. [PMID: 26493588 PMCID: PMC4619031 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1764-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard of care, but the risk of local recurrence is low with good quality total mesorectal excision (TME), although many still develop metastatic disease. Current challenges in treating rectal cancer include the development of effective organ-preserving approaches and the prevention of subsequent metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT) alone may reduce local and systemic recurrences, and may be more effective than postoperative treatments which often have poor compliance. Investigation of intensified NACT is warranted to improve outcomes for patients with LARC. The objective is to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of a four-drug regimen containing bevacizumab prior to surgical resection. METHODS/DESIGN This is a multi-centre, randomized phase II trial. Eligible patients must have histologically confirmed LARC with distal part of the tumour 4-12 cm from anal verge, no metastases, and poor prognostic features on pelvic MRI. Sixty patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive folinic acid + flurourcil + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) + bevacizumab (BVZ) or FOLFOX + irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) + BVZ, given in 2 weekly cycles for up to 6 cycles prior to TME. Patients stop treatment if they fail to respond after 3 cycles (defined as ≥ 30 % decrease in Standardised Uptake Value (SUV) compared to baseline PET/CT). The primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, MRI tumour regression grade, involved circumferential resection margin rate, T and N stage downstaging, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, local control, 1-year colostomy rate, acute toxicity, compliance to chemotherapy. DISCUSSION In LARC, a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen - if feasible, effective and tolerable would be suitable for testing as the novel arm against the current standards of short course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) and/or fluorouracil (5FU)-based CRT in a future randomised phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial identifier BACCHUS: NCT01650428.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - N Hava
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - V Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, Kings College London, London, Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - S Bosompem
- Pharmacy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - J Bridgewater
- University College, London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley St., London, WC1E 6AA, UK
| | - I Chau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London & Surrey, UK
| | - A Gaya
- Radiotherapy Department, Guys and St Thomas's Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - H Wasan
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B Moran
- Department of Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - L Melcher
- Radiotherapy Department, Beatson Oncology Centre, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - A MacDonald
- Radiotherapy Department, North Middlesex Hospital, Sterling Way, London N18 1QX, UK
| | - M Osborne
- Radiotherapy Department, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Barrack Rd, Exeter, Devon EX2 5DW, UK
| | - S Beare
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - M Jitlal
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - A Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - M Hall
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - N West
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - P Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Wai-Lup Wong
- Department of Radiology, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - M Harrison
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kraima AC, West NP, Treanor D, Magee DR, Bleys RLAW, Rutten HJT, van de Velde CJH, Quirke P, DeRuiter MC. Understanding the surgical pitfalls in total mesorectal excision: Investigating the histology of the perirectal fascia and the pelvic autonomic nerves. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:1621-9. [PMID: 26422586 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.08.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Excellent understanding of fasciae and nerves surrounding the rectum is necessary for total mesorectal excision (TME). However, fasciae anterolateral to the rectum and surrounding the low rectum are still poorly understood. We studied the perirectal fascia enfolding the extraperitoneally located part of the rectum in en-bloc cadaveric specimens and the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) pelvic dataset, and describe implications for TME. METHODS Four donated human adult cadaveric specimens (two males, two females) were obtained through the Leeds GIFT Research Tissue Programme. Paraffin-embedded blocks were produced and serially sectioned at 50 and 250 μm intervals. Whole mount sections were stained with haematoxylin & eosin, Masson's trichrome and Millers' elastin. Additionally, the UMCU pelvic dataset including digitalised cryosections of a female pelvis in three axes was studied. RESULTS The mid and lower rectum were surrounded by a multi-layered perirectal fascia, of which the mesorectal fascia (MRF) and parietal fascia bordered the 'holy plane'. There was no extra constant fascia forming a potential surgical plane. Nerves ran laterally to the MRF. More caudally, the mesorectal fat strongly reduced and the MRF approached the rectal muscularis propria. The MRF had a variable appearance in terms of thickness and completeness, most prominently at the anterolateral lower rectum. CONCLUSION Dissection onto the MRF allows nerve preservation in TME. Rectal surgeons are challenged in doing so as the MRF varies in thickness and shows gaps, most prominently at the anterolateral lower rectum. At this site, the risk of entering the mesorectum is great and may result in an incomplete specimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Kraima
- Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D Treanor
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D R Magee
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R L A W Bleys
- Department of Anatomy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M C DeRuiter
- Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kraima A, Smit N, Jansma D, Eisemann E, Park H, Chung M, West N, Quirke P, Rutten H, Vilanova A, Velde CVD, DeRuiter M. 2087 The development of a 3D anatomical atlas of the pelvis: Taking the next step in enhancing surgical anatomical education and clinical guidance. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31009-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- R G Orsini
- Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - T Wiggers
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M C DeRuiter
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R G Beets-Tan
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - H J T Rutten
- Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands ; GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pine JK, Morris E, Hutchins GG, West NP, Jayne DG, Quirke P, Prasad KR. Systemic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: the relationship to patient survival, tumour biology and local lymphocytic response to tumour. Br J Cancer 2015; 113:204-11. [PMID: 26125452 PMCID: PMC4506398 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2014] [Revised: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. The impact of inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein etc.) on CRC is increasingly studied including systemic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as they seem to predict outcome. Methods: All patients who underwent curative resection for CRC from 2000 to 2004 at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust had pre-operative NLR calculated. Demographic, histopathological and survival data were collected. Tissue microarrays were created and stained to determine the mismatch repair (MMR) protein status of each tumour. Local lymphocytic response to the tumour was assessed and graded. Results: About 358 patients were eligible. Of these 88 had an NLR ⩾5, which predicted lower overall survival and greater disease recurrence. A high NLR is associated with higher pT- and pN-stage and a greater incidence of extramural venous invasion. MMR protein status was not associated with NLR. A pronounced lymphocytic reaction at the invasive margin (IM) indicated a better prognosis and was associated with a lower NLR. Conclusion: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts disease-free and overall survival and is associated with a more aggressive tumour phenotype. The lymphocytic response to tumour at the IM is associated with NLR however dMMR is not. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a cheap, easy-to-access test that predicts outcome in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Pine
- 1] Department of HPB Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK [2] Department of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds LS9 7TF, Leeds, UK
| | - E Morris
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - G G Hutchins
- Department of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds LS9 7TF, Leeds, UK
| | - N P West
- Department of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds LS9 7TF, Leeds, UK
| | - D G Jayne
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leeds Institute of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Department of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds LS9 7TF, Leeds, UK
| | - K R Prasad
- Department of HPB Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kraima AC, West NP, Treanor D, Magee DR, Rutten HJ, Quirke P, DeRuiter MC, van de Velde CJH. Whole mount microscopic sections reveal that Denonvilliers' fascia is one entity and adherent to the mesorectal fascia; implications for the anterior plane in total mesorectal excision? Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:738-45. [PMID: 25892592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excellent anatomical knowledge of the rectum and surrounding structures is essential for total mesorectal excision (TME). Denonviliers' fascia (DVF) has been frequently studied, though the optimal anterior plane in TME is still disputed. The relationship of the lateral edges of DVF to the autonomic nerves and mesorectal fascia is unclear. We studied whole mout microscopic sections of en-bloc cadaveric pelvic exenteration and describe implications for TME. METHODS Four donated human adult cadaveric specimens (two males, two females) were obtained from the Leeds GIFT Research Tissue Programme. Paraffin-embedded mega blocks were produced and serially sectioned at 50 and 250 μm intervals. Sections were stained with haematoxylin & eosin, Masson's trichrome and Millers' elastin. Additionally, a series of eleven human fetal specimens (embryonic age of 9-20 weeks) were studied. RESULTS DVF consisted of multiple fascial condensations of collagen and smooth muscle fibres and was indistinguishable from the anterior mesorectal fascia and the prostatic fascia or posterior vaginal wall. The lateral edges of DVF appeared fan-shaped and the most posterior part was continuous with the mesorectal fascia. Fasciae were not identified in fetal specimens. CONCLUSION DVF is adherent to and continuous with the mesorectal fascia. Optimal surgical dissection during TME should be carried out anterior to DVF to ensure radical removal, particularly for anterior tumours. Autonomic nerves are at risk, but can be preserved by closely following the mesorectal fascia along the anterolateral mesorectum. The lack of evident fasciae in fetal specimens suggested that these might be formed in later developmental stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Kraima
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands; Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - N P West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - D Treanor
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - D R Magee
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - H J Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catherina Hospital Eindhoven, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| | - M C DeRuiter
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Seligmann J, Hall P, Wilson H, Richman S, Barrett J, Seymour M, Quirke P. The Derived Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (Dnlr) As a Biomarker in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (Acrc). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu333.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
31
|
Seligmann J, Elliott F, Richman S, Southward K, Barrett J, Quirke P, Seymour M. Primary Tumour Location (Ptl) As a Prognostic and Predictive Factor in Advanced Colorectal Cancer (Acrc): Data from 2075 Patients (Pts) in Randomised Trials. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu333.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
32
|
West NP, Kennedy RH, Magro T, Luglio G, Sala S, Jenkins JT, Quirke P. Morphometric analysis and lymph node yield in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision performed by supervised trainees. Br J Surg 2014; 101:1460-7. [PMID: 25139143 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2013] [Accepted: 06/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation (CME) produces an optimal colonic cancer specimen. The ability of expert laparoscopic surgeons to produce equivalent specimens is unknown. METHODS Fresh specimen photographs and clinicopathological data from patients undergoing laparoscopically assisted CME at St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, were submitted for independent pathological review. Surgery was performed by a mixture of consultant specialists and trainees under consultant specialist supervision, between February 2010 and July 2011. The planes of surgery were graded and tissue morphometry was performed using standard methods. The results were compared with published data from open CME and non-CME surgery. RESULTS In total, 69 patients were identified, and in 96 per cent resection was performed completely or partially by surgical trainees. Laparoscopic CME produced a similar specimen to open CME. The laparoscopic mesocolic plane resection rate was similar to that for open surgery (90 versus 88 per cent). The distance between the bowel wall and site of vascular division was similar for laparoscopic and open right-sided CME (92 versus 95 mm respectively). The corresponding values for left-sided CME were also similar (103 versus 107 mm). Compared with values from two non-CME series, laparoscopic CME had a higher mesocolic plane rate (90 versus 40 and 48 per cent), and resected more tissue between the bowel wall and the vascular division (right-sided: 92 versus 72 and 76 mm; left-sided: 103 versus 85 and 70 mm). The lymph node yield remained low following laparoscopic CME compared with open CME (median 18 versus 32; P < 0·001) and identical to that of non-CME surgery (median 18). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic CME can be performed to the same standard as open surgery by supervised trainees. However, this did not increase the lymph node yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N P West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Glynne-Jones R, Counsell N, Quirke P, Mortensen N, Maraveyas A, Meadows HM, Ledermann J, Sebag-Montefiore D. Chronicle: results of a randomised phase III trial in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation randomising postoperative adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus control. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:1356-1362. [PMID: 24718885 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In stage III colon cancer, oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX) improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In rectal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), we examined the benefit of postoperative adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) chemotherapy. METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned following fluoropyrimidine-based CRT and curative resection to observation or six cycles of XELOX. The primary end point was DFS; secondary end points were acute toxicity and OS. 390 patients were required in each arm, to detect an improvement in 3-year DFS from 40% to 50.5%, with 85% power and two-sided 5% significance level. RESULTS The study closed prematurely in 2008 because of poor accrual. Only 113 patients were randomly assigned to either observation (n = 59) or XELOX (n = 54). Compliance was poor, 93% allocated chemotherapy started and 48% completed six cycles. Protocolised dose reductions in XELOX were 39%, and levels of G3/G4 toxicity 40%. After a median follow-up of 44.8 months, 16 patients (27%) in the observation arm had relapsed or died compared with 12 patients (22%) in XELOX. The 3-year DFS rate was 78% with XELOX and 71% with observation [hazard ratio (HR) for DFS = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-1.69; P = 0.56]. The 3-year OS for XELOX and observation were 89% and 88%, respectively (HR for OS = 1.18; 95% CI 0.43-3.26; P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS The observed improvement in DFS for adjuvant XELOX and similar OS were not statistically significant, as expected given the small number of patients and consequent low power. Our findings support the need for trials that test the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT00427713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London.
| | | | - P Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | - N Mortensen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - A Maraveyas
- Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Munkedal DLE, West NP, Iversen LH, Hagemann-Madsen R, Quirke P, Laurberg S. Implementation of complete mesocolic excision at a university hospital in Denmark: An audit of consecutive, prospectively collected colon cancer specimens. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:1494-501. [PMID: 24947074 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Over recent years there has been a new focus on the quality of colon cancer surgery following the description and introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME). In the same period, laparoscopic surgery has been widely applied to the treatment of colon cancer. We aimed to evaluate the introduction of both CME and laparoscopic-assisted surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark between 2008 and 2011. Secondly we aimed to evaluate the impact on the quality of surgery of post-operative team meetings where pathologists demonstrated the plane of surgery on the specimens. METHOD A series of 209 consecutive and prospectively collected colon cancer specimens were evaluated by assessing the plane of surgery and measuring the amount of tissue resected. Multivariate analyses were used to control for influencing factors. RESULTS The proportion of specimens resected in the mesocolic plane was high and increased significantly following the introduction of post-operative team meetings (52%-76%, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic surgery enhanced the distance between the tumour and the arterial tie by a mean of 27 mm (p < 0.0001) and the distance between the nearest bowel wall and the arterial tie by 26 mm (p < 0.0001) when compared to an open approach. Factors such as body mass index and age influenced the outcome for surgical quality. CONCLUSION Implementation of CME and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer is a challenge and requires continuous training and feedback. Post-operative multidisciplinary team meetings may be a key element in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L E Munkedal
- Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - N P West
- Pathology, Anatomy & Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - L H Iversen
- Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - R Hagemann-Madsen
- Pathology Department, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology, Anatomy & Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - S Laurberg
- Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Maughan TS, Meade AM, Adams RA, Richman SD, Butler R, Fisher D, Wilson RH, Jasani B, Taylor GR, Williams GT, Sampson JR, Seymour MT, Nichols LL, Kenny SL, Nelson A, Sampson CM, Hodgkinson E, Bridgewater JA, Furniss DL, Roy R, Pope MJ, Pope JK, Parmar M, Quirke P, Kaplan R. A feasibility study testing four hypotheses with phase II outcomes in advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS3): a model for randomised controlled trials in the era of personalised medicine? Br J Cancer 2014; 110:2178-86. [PMID: 24743706 PMCID: PMC4007241 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2013] [Revised: 02/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular characteristics of cancer vary between individuals. In future, most trials will require assessment of biomarkers to allocate patients into enriched populations in which targeted therapies are more likely to be effective. The MRC FOCUS3 trial is a feasibility study to assess key elements in the planning of such studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced colorectal cancer were registered from 24 centres between February 2010 and April 2011. With their consent, patients' tumour samples were analysed for KRAS/BRAF oncogene mutation status and topoisomerase 1 (topo-1) immunohistochemistry. Patients were then classified into one of four molecular strata; within each strata patients were randomised to one of two hypothesis-driven experimental therapies or a common control arm (FOLFIRI chemotherapy). A 4-stage suite of patient information sheets (PISs) was developed to avoid patient overload. RESULTS A total of 332 patients were registered, 244 randomised. Among randomised patients, biomarker results were provided within 10 working days (w.d.) in 71%, 15 w.d. in 91% and 20 w.d. in 99%. DNA mutation analysis was 100% concordant between two laboratories. Over 90% of participants reported excellent understanding of all aspects of the trial. In this randomised phase II setting, omission of irinotecan in the low topo-1 group was associated with increased response rate and addition of cetuximab in the KRAS, BRAF wild-type cohort was associated with longer progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Patient samples can be collected and analysed within workable time frames and with reproducible mutation results. Complex multi-arm designs are acceptable to patients with good PIS. Randomisation within each cohort provides outcome data that can inform clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T S Maughan
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - A M Meade
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - R A Adams
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - S D Richman
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - R Butler
- University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK
| | - D Fisher
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - R H Wilson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK
| | - B Jasani
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | - G R Taylor
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - G T Williams
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | - J R Sampson
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | - M T Seymour
- St James's Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - L L Nichols
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - S L Kenny
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - A Nelson
- Wales Cancer Trials Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
| | - C M Sampson
- Wales Cancer Trials Unit, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
| | - E Hodgkinson
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
| | | | - D L Furniss
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
| | - R Roy
- Department of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, East Riding of Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, UK
| | - M J Pope
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - J K Pope
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - M Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| | - P Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - R Kaplan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London WC2B 6NH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kessler H, Brown G, Tudyka V, D'Hoore A, Kennedy RH, West NP, Kim SH, Heald R, Storli KE, Nesbakken A, Moran B. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery : proceedings of a consensus conference. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29:419-28. [PMID: 24477788 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1818-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been evident for a while that the result after resection for colon cancer may not have been optimal. Several years ago, this was showed by some leading surgeons in the USA but a concept of improving results was not consistently pursued. Later, surgeons in Europe and Japan have increasingly adopted the more radical principle of complete mesocolic excision (CME) as the optimal approach for colon cancer. The concept of CME is a similar philosophy to that of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer and precise terminology and optimal surgery are key factors. METHOD There are three essential components to CME. The main component involves a dissection between the mesenteric plane and the parietal fascia and removal of the mesentery within a complete envelope of mesenteric fascia and visceral peritoneum that contains all lymph nodes draining the tumour area (Hohenberger et al., Colorectal Disease 11:354-365, 2009; West et al., J Clin Oncol 28:272-278, 2009). The second component is a central vascular tie to completely remove all lymph nodes in the central (vertical) direction. The third component is resection of an adequate length of bowel to remove involved pericolic lymph nodes in the longitudinal direction. RESULT The oncological rationale for CME and various technical aspects of the surgical management will be explored. CONCLUSION The consensus conference agreed that there are sound oncological hypotheses for a more radical approach than has been common up to now. However, this may not necessarily apply in early stages of the tumour stage. Laparoscopic resection appears to be equally well suited for resection as open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Søndenaa
- Department of Surgery, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, POB 6165, 5892, Bergen, Norway,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Moran BJ, Holm T, Brannagan G, Chave H, Quirke P, West N, Brown G, Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Cunningham C, Janjua AZ, Battersby NJ, Crane S, McMeeking A. The English national low rectal cancer development programme: key messages and future perspectives. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16:173-8. [PMID: 24267315 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2013] [Accepted: 09/15/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum is clinically challenging because of the need to choose between a wide excision to achieve oncological clearance, on the one hand, and sphincter conservation to maintain anal function, on the other. The English National Low Rectal Cancer Development Programme (LOREC) was developed under the auspices of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland and the English National Cancer Action Team to improve the outcome of low rectal cancer in England. METHOD LOREC was initiated focusing on preoperative imaging, selective neoadjuvant therapy, optimal surgical treatment and detailed pathological assessment of the excised specimen. Its key elements were 1-day multidisciplinary team (MDT) workshops, cadaveric surgical training, surgical mentoring, pathological audit and radiological workshops. RESULTS Overall, 147 (89.6%) of 164 MDTs from 151 National Health Service (NHS) Trusts (some with two MDTs) in England participated in 15 workshops in Basingstoke or Leeds. In addition, 112 surgeons attended a 1-day cadaveric training programme in Bristol, Newcastle or Nottingham, with the main focus on extralevator abdominoperineal excision and pelvic reconstruction, with input from anatomists and from colorectal and plastic surgeons. CONCLUSION Optimal staging, selective preoperative chemoradiotherapy and precise surgery were considered as crucial to improve the outcome for patients with low rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J Moran
- Colorectal Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Quirke P, West NP, Nagtegaal ID. EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review. Virchows Arch 2014; 464:129-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1534-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Revised: 12/16/2013] [Accepted: 12/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
39
|
Quirke P, Hutchins GGA, West NP. Commentary on Demetter et al. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15:1358-60. [PMID: 24192257 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- P Quirke
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Morris EJA, Penegar S, Whitehouse LE, Quirke P, Finan P, Bishop DT, Wilkinson J, Houlston RS. A retrospective observational study of the relationship between family history and survival from colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:1502-7. [PMID: 23511565 PMCID: PMC3629434 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although family history is well established to be a risk factor for developing colorectal cancer (CRC), much less is known about its impact on patient survival. This study aimed to link CRC patient data from the National Study of Colorectal Cancer Genetics (NSCCG) to the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) to examine the relationship between family history and the characteristics and outcomes of CRC. METHODS All eligible NSCCG patients underwent a matching process to the NCDR using combinations of their personal identifiers. The characteristics and survival of CRC patients with and without a family history of CRC were compared. RESULTS Of the 10 937 NSCCG patients eligible to be matched into the NCDR, 10 782 (98.6%) could be fully linked. There were no significant differences between those with and without a family history of CRC (defined as having at least one affected first-degree relative) in terms of age, sex, tumour stage at diagnosis, presence of multiple cancers, mode of presentation to hospital and surgical management, although patients with familial CRC were more likely to have right-sided tumours (P<0.01). The survival of patients with familial CRC was significantly better than those with sporadic CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.81-0.98, P=0.02). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that it is possible to robustly match patients recruited into the NSCCG into the NCDR and, by using this record linkage, enable genetic data to be related to CRC phenotype, clinical management and outcome. This study provides evidence that a family history of CRC is associated with better survival after a diagnosis of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J A Morris
- Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology Group, Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Taylor EF, Thomas JD, Whitehouse LE, Quirke P, Jayne D, Finan PJ, Forman D, Wilkinson JR, Morris EJA. Population-based study of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery 2006-2008. Br J Surg 2013; 100:553-60. [PMID: 23288592 PMCID: PMC3592989 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2012] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Clinical guidelines recommend that, where clinically appropriate, laparoscopic tumour resections should be available for patients with colorectal cancer. This study aimed to examine the introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the English National Health Service. Methods Data were extracted from the National Cancer Data Repository on all patients who underwent major resection for a primary colorectal cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2008. Laparoscopic procedures were identified from codes in the Hospital Episode Statistics and National Bowel Cancer Audit Project data in the resource. Trends in the use of laparoscopic surgery and its influence on outcomes were examined. Results Of 58 135 resections undertaken over the study period, 10 955 (18·8 per cent) were attempted laparoscopically. This increased from 10·0 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 8·1 to 12·0) per cent in 2006 to 28·4 (25·4 to 31·4) per cent in 2008. Laparoscopic surgery was used less in patients with advanced disease (modified Dukes' stage ‘D’ versus A: odds ratio (OR) 0·45, 95 per cent c.i. 0·40 to 0·50), rectal tumours (OR 0·71, 0·67 to 0·75), those with more co-morbidity (Charlson score 3 or more versus 0: OR 0·69, 0·58 to 0·82) or presenting as an emergency (OR 0·15, 0·13 to 0·17). A total of 1652 laparoscopic procedures (15·1 per cent) were converted to open surgery. Conversion was more likely in advanced disease (modified Dukes' stage ‘D’ versus A: OR 1·56, 1·20 to 2·03), rectal tumours (OR 1·29, 1·14 to 1·46) and emergencies (OR 2·06, 1·54 to 2·76). Length of hospital stay (OR 0·65, 0·64 to 0·66), 30-day postoperative mortality (OR 0·55, 0·48 to 0·64) and risk of death within 1 year (hazard ratio 0·60, 0·55 to 0·65) were reduced in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery was used more frequently in low-risk patients. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E F Taylor
- Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
von Karsa L, Patnick J, Segnan N, Atkin W, Halloran S, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Malila N, Minozzi S, Moss S, Quirke P, Steele RJ, Vieth M, Aabakken L, Altenhofen L, Ancelle-Park R, Antoljak N, Anttila A, Armaroli P, Arrossi S, Austoker J, Banzi R, Bellisario C, Blom J, Brenner H, Bretthauer M, Camargo Cancela M, Costamagna G, Cuzick J, Dai M, Daniel J, Dekker E, Delicata N, Ducarroz S, Erfkamp H, Espinàs JA, Faivre J, Faulds Wood L, Flugelman A, Frkovic-Grazio S, Geller B, Giordano L, Grazzini G, Green J, Hamashima C, Herrmann C, Hewitson P, Hoff G, Holten I, Jover R, Kaminski MF, Kuipers EJ, Kurtinaitis J, Lambert R, Launoy G, Lee W, Leicester R, Leja M, Lieberman D, Lignini T, Lucas E, Lynge E, Mádai S, Marinho J, Maučec Zakotnik J, Minoli G, Monk C, Morais A, Muwonge R, Nadel M, Neamtiu L, Peris Tuser M, Pignone M, Pox C, Primic-Zakelj M, Psaila J, Rabeneck L, Ransohoff D, Rasmussen M, Regula J, Ren J, Rennert G, Rey J, Riddell RH, Risio M, Rodrigues V, Saito H, Sauvaget C, Scharpantgen A, Schmiegel W, Senore C, Siddiqi M, Sighoko D, Smith R, Smith S, Suchanek S, Suonio E, Tong W, Törnberg S, Van Cutsem E, Vignatelli L, Villain P, Voti L, Watanabe H, Watson J, Winawer S, Young G, Zaksas V, Zappa M, Valori R. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication. Endoscopy 2013; 45:51-9. [PMID: 23212726 PMCID: PMC4482205 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Population-based screening for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and precursor lesions, using evidence-based methods, can be effective in populations with a significant burden of the disease provided the services are of high quality. Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project co-financed by the European Union. The 450-page guidelines were published in book format by the European Commission in 2010. They include 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, individually graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. Adoption of the recommendations can improve and maintain the quality and effectiveness of an entire screening process, including identification and invitation of the target population, diagnosis and management of the disease and appropriate surveillance in people with detected lesions. To make the principles, recommendations and standards in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community and to facilitate their use in the scientific literature, the original content is presented in journal format in an open-access Supplement of Endoscopy. The editors have prepared the present overview to inform readers of the comprehensive scope and content of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L. von Karsa
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - J. Patnick
- NHS Cancer Screening Programmes Sheffield, United Kingdom,Oxford University Cancer Screening Research Unit, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - N. Segnan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France,CPO Piemonte, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin Italy
| | - W. Atkin
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Halloran
- Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom,University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | | | - N. Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
| | - S. Minozzi
- CPO Piemonte, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin Italy
| | - S. Moss
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Cancer Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - P. Quirke
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St James’ University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - R. J. Steele
- Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - M. Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - L. Aabakken
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - L. Altenhofen
- Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - N. Antoljak
- Croatian National Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia,University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - A. Anttila
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P. Armaroli
- CPO Piemonte, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin Italy
| | | | - J. Austoker
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - R. Banzi
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy
| | - C. Bellisario
- CPO Piemonte, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin Italy
| | - J. Blom
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H. Brenner
- German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Bretthauer
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M. Camargo Cancela
- National Cancer Registry, Cork, Ireland,Formerly International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - J. Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
| | - M. Dai
- Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - J. Daniel
- Formerly International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France,American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - E. Dekker
- Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N. Delicata
- National Health Screening Services, Ministry of Health, Elderly & Community Care, Valletta, Malta
| | - S. Ducarroz
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - H. Erfkamp
- University of Applied Sciences FH Joanneum, Graz, Austria
| | - J. A. Espinàs
- Catalan Cancer Strategy, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - J. Faivre
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM U866, University and CHU, Dijon, France
| | - L. Faulds Wood
- Lynn’s Bowel Cancer Campaign, Twickenham, United Kingdom
| | - A. Flugelman
- National Israeli Breast and Colorectal Cancer Detection, Haifa, Israel
| | - S. Frkovic-Grazio
- Department of Gynecological Pathology and Cytology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - B. Geller
- University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America
| | - L. Giordano
- CPO Piemonte, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin Italy
| | - G. Grazzini
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy
| | - J. Green
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - C. Herrmann
- Formerly International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France,Cancer League of Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - P. Hewitson
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - G. Hoff
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway,Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
| | - I. Holten
- Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R. Jover
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - M. F. Kaminski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - R. Lambert
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - G. Launoy
- U1086 INSERM – UCBN, CHU Caen, France
| | - W. Lee
- The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - M. Leja
- University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - D. Lieberman
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - T. Lignini
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - E. Lucas
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - E. Lynge
- University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S. Mádai
- MaMMa Healthcare Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - J. Marinho
- Health Administration Central Region Portugal, Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | - G. Minoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - C. Monk
- GlaxoSmithKline Pharma Europe, London, United Kingdom
| | - A. Morais
- Regional Health Administration, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - R. Muwonge
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - M. Nadel
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - L. Neamtiu
- Prof. Dr Ion Chiricuţă, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M. Peris Tuser
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - M. Pignone
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - C. Pox
- Ruhr Universität, Bochum, Germany
| | - M. Primic-Zakelj
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - J. Psaila
- National Health Screening Services, Ministry of Health, Elderly & Community Care, Valletta, Malta
| | - L. Rabeneck
- University of Toronto and Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - D. Ransohoff
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - M. Rasmussen
- Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J. Regula
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J. Ren
- Formerly International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - G. Rennert
- National Israeli Breast and Colorectal Cancer Detection, Haifa, Israel
| | - J. Rey
- Institut Arnault Tzanck, St Laurent du Var, France
| | | | - M. Risio
- Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo-Torino, Italy
| | - V. Rodrigues
- Faculdade de Medicina – Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - H. Saito
- National Cancer Centre, Tokyo, Japan
| | - C. Sauvaget
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - C. Senore
- CPO Piemonte, AO Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin Italy
| | - M. Siddiqi
- Cancer Foundation of India, Kolkata, India
| | - D. Sighoko
- Formerly International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France,The University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Hematology–Oncology Section, Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics, Global Health, Chicago, United States of America
| | - R. Smith
- American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - S. Smith
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - S. Suchanek
- Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - E. Suonio
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - W. Tong
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - S. Törnberg
- Department of Cancer Screening, Stockholm Gotland Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - L. Vignatelli
- Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale–Regione Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy
| | - P. Villain
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - L. Voti
- Formerly International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France,University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | | | - J. Watson
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - S. Winawer
- Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States of America
| | - G. Young
- Gastrointestinal Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - V. Zaksas
- State Patient Fund, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - M. Zappa
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy
| | - R. Valori
- NHS Endoscopy, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2012; 100:75-82. [PMID: 23132548 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 456] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic resection is used widely in the management of colorectal cancer; however, the data on long-term outcomes, particularly those related to rectal cancer, are limited. The results of long-term follow-up of the UK Medical Research Council trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer are presented. METHODS A total of 794 patients from 27 UK centres were randomized to laparoscopic or open surgery in a 2:1 ratio between 1996 and 2002. Long-term follow-up data were analysed to determine differences in survival outcomes and recurrences for intention-to-treat and actual treatment groups. RESULTS Median follow-up of all patients was 62·9 (interquartile range 22·9 - 92·8) months. There were no statistically significant differences between open and laparoscopic groups in overall survival (78·3 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 65·8 to 106·6) versus 82·7 (69·1 to 94·8) months respectively; P = 0·780) and disease-free survival (DFS) (89·5 (67·1 to 121·7) versus 77·0 (63·3 to 94·0) months; P = 0·589). In colonic cancer intraoperative conversions to open surgery were associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 2·28, 95 per cent c.i. 1·47 to 3·53; P < 0·001) and DFS (HR 2·20, 1·31 to 3·67; P = 0·007). In terms of recurrence, no significant differences were observed by randomized procedure. However, at 10 years, right colonic cancers showed an increased propensity for local recurrence compared with left colonic cancers: 14·7 versus 5·2 per cent (difference 9·5 (95 per cent c.i. 2·3 to 16·6) per cent; P = 0·019). CONCLUSION Long-term results continue to support the use of laparoscopic surgery for both colonic and rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B L Green
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, and Sections of Molecular Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
AIM Extralevator abdominoperineal excision in the prone position has been reported as a method to improve the poor outcome sometimes observed after abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal cancer. In this paper a pictorial guide is presented describing the key anatomical steps and landmarks of the operation. METHOD Intraoperative footage of five APE operations filmed in high definition was reviewed and key stages of the operation were identified. Still frames were captured from these sequences to illustrate this guide. An edited video sequence was produced from one of these operations to accompany this paper. CONCLUSION The prone APE allows improved visualization of the perineal portion of the operation by the surgeon, assistants and observers. It permits clear demonstration for teaching. Prospective evaluation is still required to identify patients who would benefit from extralevator APE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O C Shihab
- Colorectal Research, Pelican Cancer Foundation, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vieth M, Quirke P, Lambert R, von Karsa L, Risio M. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Annotations of colorectal lesions. Endoscopy 2012; 44 Suppl 3:SE131-9. [PMID: 23012116 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on quality assurance in pathology was supplemented by an annex describing in greater detail some issues raised in the chapter, particularly details of special interest to pathologists. The content of the annex is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the issues discussed in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Quirke P, Risio M, Lambert R, von Karsa L, Vieth M. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 2012; 44 Suppl 3:SE116-30. [PMID: 23012115 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The full guideline document covers the entire process of population-based screening. It consists of 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. The 450-page guidelines and the extensive evidence base have been published by the European Commission. The chapter on quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis includes 23 graded recommendations. The content of the chapter is presented here to promote international discussion and collaboration by making the principles and standards recommended in the new EU Guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community. Following these recommendations has the potential to enhance the control of colorectal cancer through improvement in the quality and effectiveness of the screening process, including multi-disciplinary diagnosis and management of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Venderbosch S, De Haan T, Heideman D, Maughan T, Smith C, Quirke P, Richman S, Nagtegaal I, Punt C, Koopman M. Deficient Mismatch Repair (DMMR) and Braf Mutation (MT) Status in Patients (PTS) With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (MCRC): A Meta-Analysis of the Cairo, CAIRO2, Coin and Focus Studies. Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(20)33156-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
48
|
Quirke P. 196. Rectal pathology. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.06.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
49
|
Morris EJA, Whitehouse LE, Farrell T, Nickerson C, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Rutter MD, Rees C, Finan PJ, Wilkinson JR, Patnick J. A retrospective observational study examining the characteristics and outcomes of tumours diagnosed within and without of the English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:757-64. [PMID: 22850549 PMCID: PMC3425974 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is common in England and, with long-term survival relatively poor, improving outcomes is a priority. A major initiative to reduce mortality from the disease has been the introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). Combining data from the BCSP with that in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) allows all tumours diagnosed in England to be categorised according to their involvement with the BCSP. This study sought to quantify the characteristics of the tumours diagnosed within and outside the BCSP and investigate its impact on outcomes. Methods: Linkage of the NCDR and BCSP data allowed all tumours diagnosed between July 2006 and December 2008 to be categorised into four groups; screen-detected tumours, screening-interval tumours, tumours diagnosed in non-participating invitees and tumours diagnosed in those never invited to participate. The characteristics, management and outcome of tumours in each category were compared. Results: In all, 76 943 individuals were diagnosed with their first primary colorectal cancer during the study period. Of these 2213 (2.9%) were screen-detected, 623 (0.8%) were screening-interval cancers, 1760 (2.3%) were diagnosed in individuals in non-participating invitees and 72 437 (94.1%) were diagnosed in individuals not invited to participate in the programme due to its ongoing roll-out over the time period studied. Screen-detected tumours were identified at earlier Dukes’ stages, were more likely to be managed with curative intent and had significantly better outcomes than tumours in other categories. Conclusion: Screen-detected cancers had a significantly better prognosis than other tumours and this would suggest that the BCSP should reduce mortality from colorectal cancer in England.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J A Morris
- Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Level 6, Bexley Wing, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abdulkareem FB, Sanni LA, Richman SD, Chambers P, Hemmings G, Grabsch H, Quirke P, Elesha SO, Banjo AF, Atoyebi OA, Adesanya AA, Onyekwere CA, Ojukwu J, Anomneze EE, Rotimi O. KRAS and BRAF mutations in Nigerian colorectal cancers. West Afr J Med 2012; 31:198-203. [PMID: 23310942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Activation of the KRAS oncogene is implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis and mutations have been reported in 30-50% of cases. BRAF mutation, though less common, is also reported and importantly associated with shorter progression-free interval. This study aims to determine the KRAS and BRAF mutation statuses of Nigerian colorectal cancers (CRC). METHODS Mutation analysis was carried out on archival paraffin-embedded blocks of CRC tissues. KRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 and BRAF V600E were assessed by pyrosequencing after DNA extraction from 200 cases at the Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St. James's University Hospital, UK. Mutation rates and the spectra were determined. RESULTS Pyrosequencing was successful in 112 of 200 cases. KRAS mutation in codons 12 and 13 was demonstrated in 23 of 112 cases (21%); none in codon 61. BRAF mutation in codon 600 was demonstrated in 4.5%. CONCLUSION This study shows that 21% of Nigerian CRC patients carry a KRAS mutation; half the rate in Caucasians; and that BRAF mutation also occurs in Nigerian CRC cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F B Abdulkareem
- Department of Morbid Anatomy, College of Medicine University of Lagos
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|