Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: An international comparison

Objective

Providing feedback to mammography radiologists and facilities may improve interpretive performance. We conducted a web-based survey to investigate how and why such feedback is undertaken and used in mammographic screening programmes.

Methods

The survey was sent to representatives in 30 International Cancer Screening Network member countries where mammographic screening is offered.

Results

Seventeen programmes in 14 countries responded to the survey. Audit feedback was aimed at readers in 14 programmes, and facilities in 12 programmes. Monitoring quality assurance was the most common purpose of audit feedback. Screening volume, recall rate, and rate of screen-detected cancers were typically reported performance measures. Audit reports were commonly provided annually, but more frequently when target guidelines were not reached.

Conclusion

The purpose, target audience, performance measures included, form and frequency of the audit feedback varied amongst mammographic screening programmes. These variations may provide a basis for those developing and improving such programmes.

Abstract P3-06-03: Oral bisphosphonates and survival of breast and colon malignancies

Bisphosphonates are traditionally used for treatment of osteoporosis and more recently for treatment and prevention of bone metastases in various malignancies. The use of 2nd-generation oral bisphosphonates has been reported to reduce the risk of developing breast and colon cancer but their influence on cancer survival has not been studied.

Methods Two large cohorts of consecutively diagnosed cases with breast or colorectal cancer were studied for the association between use of 2nd-generation oral bisphosphonates and cancer survival. Using computerized prescription records, sustained use of alendronate/risedronate was assessed in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast (n = 2,843) or colorectal cancer (n = 1,706). Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were evaluated using time dependent analysis.

Results Postmenopausal women with breast cancer previously unexposed to bisphosphonates who used 2nd-generation bisphosphonates after diagnosis for at least one year had a significantly better survival than non-users, adjusted for age, tumor stage and grade (Overall survival: HR = 0.53, 0.33-0.86, breast cancer-specific survival: HR = 0.26, 0.10-0.71, p = 0.009). A similar advantageous hazard ratio was found in users with ER positive, ER negative and HER2neu positive tumors. A similar significantly better survival was noted for colorectal cancer after adjustment for age, tumor stage and grade (Overall survival: HR = 0.53, 0.33-0.85, colorectal cancer-specific survival: HR = 0.44, 0.21-0.88, p = 0.02). Women who used bisphosphonates before diagnosis did not exhibit a significant survival benefit. Pharmacogenetic studies of F(D)PPS (Farnesyl Pyrophosphate Synthase), a gene coding a key step in the mevalonate pathway revealed direct correlation between a minor homozygous status and survival in bisphosphonate users.

Conclusions The use of 2nd-generation bisphosphonates initiated after diagnosis was associated with a significant improvement in overall and in cancer-specific survival of postmenopausal women with breast or colon cancers.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-06-03.

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication

Population-based screening for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and precursor lesions, using evidence-based methods, can be effective in populations with a significant burden of the disease provided the services are of high quality. Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project co-financed by the European Union. The 450-page guidelines were published in book format by the European Commission in 2010.  They include 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, individually graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. Adoption of the recommendations can improve and maintain the quality and effectiveness of an entire screening process, including identification and invitation of the target population, diagnosis and management of the disease and appropriate surveillance in people with detected lesions. To make the principles, recommendations and standards in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community and to facilitate their use in the scientific literature, the original content is presented in journal format in an open-access Supplement of Endoscopy. The editors have prepared the present overview to inform readers of the comprehensive scope and content of the guidelines.

Association of PHB 1630 C>T and MTHFR 677 C>T polymorphisms with breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: results from a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The variable penetrance of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers suggests that other genetic or environmental factors modify breast cancer risk. Two genes of special interest are prohibitin (PHB) and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), both of which are important either directly or indirectly in maintaining genomic integrity.

METHODS

To evaluate the potential role of genetic variants within PHB and MTHFR in breast and ovarian cancer risk, 4102 BRCA1 and 2093 BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 6211 BRCA1 and 2902 BRCA2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (CIMBA) were genotyped for the PHB 1630 C>T (rs6917) polymorphism and the MTHFR 677 C>T (rs1801133) polymorphism, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of association between the PHB 1630 C>T and MTHFR 677 C>T polymorphisms with either disease for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers when breast and ovarian cancer associations were evaluated separately. Analysis that evaluated associations for breast and ovarian cancer simultaneously showed some evidence that BRCA1 mutation carriers who had the rare homozygote genotype (TT) of the PHB 1630 C>T polymorphism were at increased risk of both breast and ovarian cancer (HR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10-2.04 and HR 2.16, 95%CI 1.24-3.76, respectively). However, there was no evidence of association under a multiplicative model for the effect of each minor allele.

CONCLUSION

The PHB 1630TT genotype may modify breast and ovarian cancer risks in BRCA1 mutation carriers. This association need to be evaluated in larger series of BRCA1 mutation carriers.