Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health: a cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The BETTER (Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care) intervention was designed to integrate the approach to chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care and demonstrated effective in a previous randomized trial.

METHODS

We tested the effectiveness of the BETTER HEALTH intervention, a public health adaptation of BETTER, at improving participation in chronic disease prevention and screening actions for residents of low-income neighbourhoods in a cluster randomized trial, with ten low-income neighbourhoods in Durham Region Ontario randomized to immediate intervention vs. wait-list. The unit of analysis was the individual, and eligible participants were adults age 40-64 years residing in the neighbourhoods. Public health nurses trained as "prevention practitioners" held one prevention-focused visit with each participant. They provided participants with a tailored prevention prescription and supported them to set health-related goals. The primary outcome was a composite index: the number of evidence-based actions achieved at six months as a proportion of those for which participants were eligible at baseline.

RESULTS

Of 126 participants (60 in immediate arm; 66 in wait-list arm), 125 were included in analyses (1 participant withdrew consent). In both arms, participants were eligible for a mean of 8.6 actions at baseline. At follow-up, participants in the immediate intervention arm met 64.5% of actions for which they were eligible versus 42.1% in the wait-list arm (rate ratio 1.53 [95% confidence interval 1.22-1.84]).

CONCLUSION

Public health nurses using the BETTER HEALTH intervention led to a higher proportion of identified evidence-based prevention and screening actions achieved at six months for people living with socioeconomic disadvantage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03052959 , registered February 10, 2017.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Ontario Cervical Screening Program, colposcopy and treatment services in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study

Objective

To describe the immediate impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on cervical screening, colposcopy and treatment volumes in Ontario, Canada.

Design

Population‐based retrospective observational study.

Setting

Ontario, Canada.

Population

People with a cervix age of 21–69 years who completed at least one cervical screening cytology test, colposcopy or treatment procedure for cervical dysplasia between January 2019 and August 2020.

Methods

Administrative databases were used to compare cervical screening cytology, colposcopy and treatment procedure volumes before (historical comparator) and during the first 6 months of the COVID‐19 pandemic (March–August 2020).

Main outcome measures

Changes in cervical screening cytology, colposcopy and treatment volumes; individuals with high‐grade cytology awaiting colposcopy.

Results

During the first 6 months of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the monthly average number of cervical screening cytology tests, colposcopies and treatments decreased by 63.8% (range: −92.3 to −41.0%), 39.7% (range: −75.1 to −14.3%) and 31.1% (range: −43.5 to −23.6%), respectively, when compared with the corresponding months in 2019. Between March and August 2020, on average 292 (−51.0%) fewer high‐grade cytological abnormalities were detected through screening each month. As of August 2020, 1159 (29.2%) individuals with high‐grade screening cytology were awaiting follow‐up colposcopy.

Conclusions

The COVID‐19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on key cervical screening and follow‐up services in Ontario. As the pandemic continues, ongoing monitoring of service utilisation to inform system response and recovery is required. Future efforts to understand the impact of COVID‐19‐related disruptions on cervical cancer outcomes will be needed.

Tweetable abstract

COVID‐19 has had a substantial impact on cervical screening and follow‐up services in Ontario, Canada.

COVID‐19 has had a substantial impact on cervical screening and follow‐up services in Ontario, Canada.

A63 REFINING THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY GUIDELINE ON SCREENING IN PERSONS WITH A FAMILY HISTORY OF NONHEREDITARY COLORECTAL CANCER OR ADENOMA: A MODIFIED DELPHI PROCESS

Background

In 2018, the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) published an extensive systematic review and guideline on screening in persons with a family history (FHx) of nonhereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma. While CAG’s recommendations were evidence-based, some recommendations lacked precision (e.g. ranges for some start ages & intervals) and screening cessation age was not addressed, leading to implementation challenges for practitioners and CRC screening programs.

Aims

To review and update the evidence since the 2018 guideline and to formulate implementable recommendations in the Ontario context that are aligned with the CAG guideline.

Methods

ColonCancerCheck (Ontario’s organized CRC screening program) conducted a modified version of the literature search used by CAG (Jan 2017 - Sept 2019). A 19-member expert panel with Canadian and international representatives from endoscopy, primary care, epidemiology, organized CRC screening programs, Ontario’s cancer system and the general public refined the recommendations of the CAG guideline for the purposes of implementation in an organized CRC screening program using a modified Delphi process. This iterative process involved a series of webinars and anonymous survey rounds where the panel reviewed evidence materials and provided online feedback to develop, refine & achieve consensus on screening recommendations in persons with a FHx of CRC/adenoma. Consensus was achieved if ≥75% of members agreed or strongly agreed with the statement.

Results

Six new systematic reviews and 2 new guidelines were identified. New evidence included data on the absolute risk (10 year & lifetime risk) of CRC by type of FHx, as well as the performance of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and barriers to CRC screening in persons with a FHx of CRC. The expert panel participated in 3 webinars and 4 online surveys to arrive at consensus. Panel recommendations and level of consensus will be reported for the 6 statements (Table).

Conclusions

Building from the CAG guideline, we derived evidence-based and implementable recommendations for screening persons with a FHx of CRC or adenoma.

Funding Agencies

Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)

Better Health Durham: Community Engagement in a Cluster RCT of a Prevention Practitioner Intervention in Low-Income Neighbourhoods

Background: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening (BETTER) intervention has improved uptake of chronic disease prevention and screening activities in primary care. The BETTER intervention consists of 1:1 visits between prevention practitioners (PPs) and patients (40-65 years). It is unknown if an adapted BETTER could be effective in the community with public health nurses as PPs. Aim: The presentation objective is to describe community engagement strategies in a cluster RCT in low income neighborhoods with low cancer screening rates and low uptake of primary care. Methods: Principles of community-based participatory research were used to design the community engagement strategy in Durham region, Ontario. Key elements included close collaboration with public health partners to identify stakeholders and creating a community advisory committee (CAC) and a primary care engagement group to provide advice. Results: We identified 15 community stakeholder groups (∼47 subgroups) including service organizations, faith groups, and charitable organizations representing diverse constituents. Community outreach activities included in-person meetings and information displays at local events. The CAC is comprised of members of the public and representatives from primary care, social services, and community organizations. The CAC and primary care engagement groups have provided advice on trial recruitment strategies and on the design of the PP visit. Conclusion: The partnership between public health, primary care, and the study team has been crucial to connect with community stakeholders. Community engagement is essential in raising awareness about the study and will contribute to successful recruitment. Trial Registration: NCT03052959

A centrally generated primary care physician audit report does not improve colonoscopy uptake after a positive result on a fecal occult blood test in Ontario's ColonCancerCheck program

BACKGROUND

Timely follow-up of fecal occult blood screening with colonoscopy is essential for achieving colorectal cancer mortality reduction. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of centrally generated, physician-targeted audit and feedback to improve colonoscopy uptake after a positive fecal occult blood test (fobt) result within Ontario's population-wide ColonCancerCheck Program.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study used data sets from Ontario's ColonCancerCheck Program (2008-2011) that were linked to provincial administrative health databases. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of centralized, physician-targeted audit and feedback on colonoscopy uptake in an Ontario-wide fobt-positive cohort.

RESULTS

A mailed physician audit and feedback report identifying individuals outstanding for colonoscopy for 3 or more months after a positive fobt result did not increase the likelihood of colonoscopy uptake (hazard ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 1.13). Duration of positive fobt status was strongly inversely associated with the hazard of follow-up colonoscopy (p for linear trend: <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large population-wide setting, centralized tracking in the form of physician-targeted mailed audit and feedback reports does not improve colonoscopy uptake for screening participants with a positive fobt result outstanding for 3 or more months. Mailed physician-targeted screening audit and feedback reports alone are unlikely to improve compliance with follow-up colonoscopy in Ontario. Other interventions such as physician audits or automatic referrals, demonstrated to be effective in other jurisdictions, might be warranted.

Training non-physicians to do endoscopy: Feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in women and men worldwide. Training non-physicians including nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants to perform endoscopy can provide the opportunity to expand access to CRC screening as demand for endoscopic procedures continues to grow. A formal program, incorporating didactic instruction and hands-on practice in addition to oversight, is required to train non-physicians to perform endoscopy as safely and effectively as physicians. Additionally, the context in which the non-physician endoscopy program is organized will dictate key program characteristics including remuneration, participant recruitment and professional and legal considerations. This review explores the evidence in support of non-physician based endoscopy, potential challenges in implementing non-physician endoscopy and requirements for a high-quality program to support training and implementation.

Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature

OBJECTIVE

Interval colorectal cancers (interval CRCs), that is, cancers occurring after a negative screening test or examination, are an important indicator of the quality and effectiveness of CRC screening and surveillance. In order to compare incidence rates of interval CRCs across screening programmes, a standardised definition is required. Our goal was to develop an internationally applicable definition and taxonomy for reporting on interval CRCs.

DESIGN

Using a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus, the Expert Working Group on interval CRC of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee of the World Endoscopy Organization developed a nomenclature for defining and characterising interval CRCs.

RESULTS

We define an interval CRC as a "colorectal cancer diagnosed after a screening or surveillance exam in which no cancer is detected, and before the date of the next recommended exam". Guidelines and principles for describing and reporting on interval CRCs are provided, and clinical scenarios to demonstrate the practical application of the nomenclature are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The Working Group on interval CRC of the World Endoscopy Organization endorses adoption of this standardised nomenclature. A standardised nomenclature will facilitate benchmarking and comparison of interval CRC rates across programmes and regions.

An updated Asia Pacific Consensus Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening

OBJECTIVE

Since the publication of the first Asia Pacific Consensus on Colorectal Cancer (CRC) in 2008, there are substantial advancements in the science and experience of implementing CRC screening. The Asia Pacific Working Group aimed to provide an updated set of consensus recommendations.

DESIGN

Members from 14 Asian regions gathered to seek consensus using other national and international guidelines, and recent relevant literature published from 2008 to 2013. A modified Delphi process was adopted to develop the statements.

RESULTS

Age range for CRC screening is defined as 50-75 years. Advancing age, male, family history of CRC, smoking and obesity are confirmed risk factors for CRC and advanced neoplasia. A risk-stratified scoring system is recommended for selecting high-risk patients for colonoscopy. Quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) instead of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) is preferred for average-risk subjects. Ancillary methods in colonoscopy, with the exception of chromoendoscopy, have not proven to be superior to high-definition white light endoscopy in identifying adenoma. Quality of colonoscopy should be upheld and quality assurance programme should be in place to audit every aspects of CRC screening. Serrated adenoma is recognised as a risk for interval cancer. There is no consensus on the recruitment of trained endoscopy nurses for CRC screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on recent data on CRC screening, an updated list of recommendations on CRC screening is prepared. These consensus statements will further enhance the implementation of CRC screening in the Asia Pacific region.

European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication

Population-based screening for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and precursor lesions, using evidence-based methods, can be effective in populations with a significant burden of the disease provided the services are of high quality. Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project co-financed by the European Union. The 450-page guidelines were published in book format by the European Commission in 2010.  They include 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, individually graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. Adoption of the recommendations can improve and maintain the quality and effectiveness of an entire screening process, including identification and invitation of the target population, diagnosis and management of the disease and appropriate surveillance in people with detected lesions. To make the principles, recommendations and standards in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community and to facilitate their use in the scientific literature, the original content is presented in journal format in an open-access Supplement of Endoscopy. The editors have prepared the present overview to inform readers of the comprehensive scope and content of the guidelines.

Abstract P3-02-10: Implementation and uptake of a provincial, population-based, organized breast screening program for high risk women in Ontario: The Ontario breast screening program (OBSP) high risk program

Background: Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1/2 has been clinically available in Ontario since 2000. Over 15000 individuals have been tested. Evidence from clinical trials has consistently shown that women at high risk of breast cancer (BrCa) benefit from BrCa screening that includes both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast and mammography, yet access to MRI in Ontario was variable. In 2011, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) established an expert panel to develop a protocol for expanding the OBSP, initially created for average risk women 50–74, to include MRI and mammography for eligible high risk women.

Methods: The panel's tasks included: 1. determining high risk criteria 2. estimating the prevalence of high risk women 3. selecting a cancer risk model 4. developing a referral and assessment pathway for potentially eligible subjects 5. developing educational resources, training plan and communication strategy for relevant stakeholders 6. developing indicators for program evaluation, 7. providing guidance for post-implementation issues.

Results: The program was initiated July, 2011 and now includes 28 sites. Women aged 30–69 with and without a history of breast cancer are eligible if they 1. are BRCA1/2 mutation carriers or untested first degree relatives of carriers, 2. have a lifetime risk of breast cancer &gt;=25% based on family history according to IBIS or BOADICEA risk models, or 3. received prior radiation therapy to the chest. It is estimated that 34000 high risk women in the target age group live in Ontario. Preliminary volume data for the first 9 mos are shown in Table 1. Of the 5037 women participating, 802 have been referred directly by their physician and 4,235 have been referred for genetic assessment. Of the 2,946 women who received genetic assessment, 31% met the high risk criteria. To date, 729 high risk MRI scans have been performed.

Conclusions: A population based organized screening program for high risk women that includes genetic risk assessment has been implemented in Ontario. Further evaluation of risk assessment and screen results are underway. To our knowledge, this is the first organized screening program for women at high risk of breast cancer.

Cancer diagnostic assessment programs: standards for the organization of care in Ontario

Background

Improving access to better, more efficient, and rapid cancer diagnosis is a necessary component of a high-quality cancer system. How diagnostic services ought to be organized, structured, and evaluated is less understood and studied. Our objective was to address this gap.

Methods

As a quality initiative of Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care, the Diagnostic Assessment Standards Panel, with representation from clinical oncology experts, institutional and clinical administrative leaders, health service researchers, and methodologists, conducted a systematic review and a targeted environmental scan of the unpublished literature. Standards were developed based on expert consensus opinion informed by the identified evidence. Through external review, clinicians and administrators across Ontario were given the opportunity to provide feedback.

Results

The body of evidence consists of thirty-five published studies and fifteen unpublished guidance documents. The evidence and consensus opinion consistently favoured an organized, centralized system with multidisciplinary team membership as the optimal approach for the delivery of diagnostic cancer assessment services. Independent external stakeholders agreed (with higher mean values, maximum 5, indicating stronger agreement) that dap standards are needed (mean: 4.6), that standards should be formally approved (mean: 4.3), and importantly, that standards reflect an effective approach that will lead to quality improvements in the cancer system (mean: 4.5) and in patient care (mean: 4.3).

Interpretation

Based on the best available evidence, standards for the organization of daps are offered. There is clear need to integrate formal and comprehensive evaluation strategies with the implementation of the standards to advance this field.

Increasing incidence of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Ontario, Canada: evidence from health administrative data

OBJECTIVE

Health administrative databases can be used to track chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to validate a case ascertainment definition of paediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using administrative data and describe its epidemiology in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

A population-based clinical database of patients with IBD aged <15 years was used to define cases, and patient information was linked to health administrative data to compare the accuracy of various patterns of healthcare use. The most accurate algorithm was validated with chart data of children aged <18 years from 12 medical practices. Administrative data from the period 1991-2008 were used to describe the incidence and prevalence of IBD in Ontario children. Changes in incidence were tested using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Accurate identification of children with IBD required four physician contacts or two hospitalisations (with International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for IBD) within 3 years if they underwent colonoscopy and seven contacts or three hospitalisations within 3 years in those without colonoscopy (children <12 years old, sensitivity 90.5%, specificity >99.9%; children <15 years old, sensitivity 89.6%, specificity >99.9%; children <18 years old, sensitivity 91.1%, specificity 99.5%). Age- and sex-standardised prevalence per 100 000 population of paediatric IBD has increased from 42.1 (in 1994) to 56.3 (in 2005). Incidence per 100 000 has increased from 9.5 (in 1994) to 11.4 (in 2005). Statistically significant increases in incidence were noted in 0-4 year olds (5.0%/year, p = 0.03) and 5-9 year olds (7.6%/year, p<0.0001), but not in 10-14 or 15-17 year olds.

CONCLUSION

Ontario has one of the highest rates of childhood-onset IBD in the world, and there is an accelerated increase in incidence in younger children.

Cancer Care Ontario Colonoscopy Standards: standards and evidentiary base

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cause of non-tobacco-related cancer deaths in Canadian men and women, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths. An estimated 7800 men and women will be diagnosed with CRC, and 3250 will die from the disease in Ontario in 2007. Given that CRC incidence and mortality rates in Ontario are among the highest in the world, the best opportunity to reduce this burden of disease would be through screening. The present report describes the findings and recommendations of Cancer Care Ontario's Colonoscopy Standards Expert Panel, which was convened in March 2006 by the Program in Evidence-Based Care. The recommendations will form the basis of the quality assurance program for colonoscopy delivered in support of Ontario's CRC screening program.

Estimating the impact of alcohol consumption on survival for HIV+ individuals

Alcohol consumption is associated with decreased antiretroviral adherence, and decreased adherence results in poorer outcomes. However the magnitude of alcohol's impact on survival is unknown. Our objective was to use a calibrated and validated simulation of HIV disease to estimate the impact of alcohol on survival. We incorporated clinical data describing the temporal and dose-response relationships between alcohol consumption and adherence in a large observational cohort (N=2,702). Individuals were categorized as nondrinkers (no alcohol consumption), hazardous drinkers (consume > or =5 standard drinks on drinking days), and nonhazardous drinkers (consume <5 standard drinks on drinking days). Our results showed that nonhazardous alcohol consumption decreased survival by more than 1 year if the frequency of consumption was once per week or greater, and by 3.3 years (from 21.7 years to 18.4 years) with daily consumption. Hazardous alcohol consumption decreased overall survival by more than 3 years if frequency of consumption was once per week or greater, and by 6.4 years (From 16.1 years to 9.7 years) with daily consumption. Our results suggest that alcohol is an underappreciated yet modifiable risk factor for poor survival among individuals with HIV.

Accuracy of administrative health data for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal diseases

BACKGROUND

The use of administrative health data is increasingly common for the study of various medical and surgical diseases. The validity of diagnosis codes for the study of benign upper gastrointestinal disorders has not been well studied.

METHODS

The authors abstracted the charts for 590 adult patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Clinical diagnoses from medical records were compared with International Classification of Diseases Version 9 (ICD-9) codes in electronic hospital discharge abstracts. The primary analysis aimed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of a most responsible "esophagitis" diagnosis code for the prediction of esophagitis. Secondary analyses determined the performance characteristics of the diagnostic codes for esophageal ulcer, esophageal stricture, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastritis, gastric ulcer, and duodenal ulcer.

RESULTS

The authors linked 500 patient records to electronic discharge abstracts. When listed as the most responsible diagnosis for admission, the ICD-9 codes for esophagitis showed a sensitivity of 46.79%, a specificity of 98.83%, and a PPV of 94.81%. When listed as a secondary diagnosis, the ICD-9 codes showed a sensitivity of 70.51%, a specificity of 97.67%, and a PPV of 93.22%. The diagnostic properties of ICD-9 codes for GERD (most responsible, secondary) were as follows: sensitivity (56.10%, 78.66%), specificity (98.51%, 96.73%), and PPV (94.84%, 92.14%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ICD-9 diagnosis codes for benign upper gastrointestinal diseases are highly specific and associated with strong PPVs, but have poor sensitivity.

Increased use of low anterior resection for veterans with rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Two surgical procedures with curative intent are available to patients with rectal cancer: lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection; however, lower anterior resection may improve quality of life and functional status.

AIM

To examine temporal changes in after lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection between 1989 and 2000. Potential factors associated with the use of lower anterior resection were evaluated.

METHODS

Using national administrative data, we identified patients who received lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. Logistic regression models examined the association between use of lower anterior resection and time period of surgical resection.

RESULTS

A total of 5201 rectal cancer patients underwent resection. The use of lower anterior resection increased from 40.0% (1989-91) to 50.1% (1998-2000) paralleled by a corresponding decline in abdominoperineal resection (60.1 to 49.9%; P < 0.001). Patients who received surgery during 1992-94, 1995-97 and 1998-2000 were 6, 7 and 28% more likely to receive lower anterior resection, when compared with 1989-1991 after adjusting for demographic characteristics, co-morbidity and hospital surgical volume. Older age, lower co-morbidity score and lower hospital surgical volume were predictive of lower anterior resection.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the use of lower anterior resection for rectal cancer was observed over time. This observed increase in use is not confined to high-volume hospitals.

Dietary intake and the risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a cross sectional study in volunteers

BACKGROUND

Although diet has been associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), the role of dietary components (total energy, macro and micronutrients) is unknown. We examined associations of GORD symptoms with intakes of specific dietary components.

METHODS

We conducted a cross sectional study in a sample of employees (non-patients) at the Houston VAMC. The Gastro Esophageal Reflux Questionnaire was used to identify the onset, frequency, and severity of GORD symptoms. Dietary intake (usual frequency of consumption of various foods and portion sizes) over the preceding year was assessed using the Block 98 food frequency questionnaire. Upper endoscopy was offered to all participants and oesophageal erosions recorded according to the LA classification. We compared the dietary intake (macronutrients, micronutrients, food groups) of participants with or without GORD symptoms, or erosive oesophagitis. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between nutrients and GORD symptoms or oesophageal erosions, adjusting for demographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), and total energy intake.

RESULTS

A total of 371 of 915 respondents (41%) had complete and interpretable answers to both heartburn and regurgitation questions and met validity criteria for the Block 98 FFQ. Mean age was 43 years, 260 (70%) were women, and 103 (28%) reported at least weekly occurrences of heartburn or regurgitation. Of the 164 respondents on whom endoscopies were performed, erosive oesophagitis was detected in 40 (24%). Compared to participants without GORD symptoms, daily intakes of total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, percentage of energy from dietary fat, and average fat servings were significantly higher in participants with GORD symptoms. In addition, there was a dose-response relationship between GORD and saturated fat and cholesterol. The effect of dietary fat became non-significant when adjusted for BMI. However, high saturated fat, cholesterol, or fat servings were associated with GORD symptoms only in participants with a BMI >25 kg/m2 (effect modification). Fibre intake remained inversely associated with the risk of GORD symptoms in adjusted full models. Participants with erosive oesophagitis had significantly higher daily intakes of total fat and protein than those without it (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cross sectional study, high dietary fat intake was associated with an increased risk of GORD symptoms and erosive oesophagitis while high fibre intake correlated with a reduced risk of GORD symptoms. It is unclear if the effects of dietary fat are independent of obesity.

Outcomes in elderly patients following surgery for colorectal cancer in the veterans affairs health care system

AIM

To compare 30-day and 5-year mortality in elderly vs. younger patients following surgical resection for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A cohort study of patients admitted to VA hospitals with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between October 1990 and September 2000. Cumulative survival rates (30-day and 5-year) were calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates and adjusted risks of death were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 34,888 individuals with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer between October 1990 and September 2000, of whom 22 633 (65%) underwent surgical resection. The 30-day mortality following resection for rectal and colon cancer, respectively, for patients <65 years was 2.1 and 2.8% compared with 4.9 and 5.6% for those > or =65 years. The 5-year cumulative survival for rectal and colon cancer for patients <65 years was 54.0 and 57.6% compared with 44.5 and 46.6% for those > or =65 years. In patients > or =65 years with rectal or colon cancer, after adjustment, 30-day mortality was 2 times greater and 5-year mortality was 1 times greater than in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age is an independent predictor of increased short-term and long-term mortality following surgery in patients with rectal and colon cancer.

Association of hypocholesterolaemia with hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected people

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) status on serum cholesterol levels in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from the 881 participants of the Veterans Ageing Cohort 3 Site Study. Four different models were constructed using total cholesterol, low-density lipid (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipid (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides as dependent variables. The relevant covariates included HCV antibody status, HIV medication class, CD4 count, HIV viral load, glucose level, lipid-lowering drug use, gender, race, age, liver function test results, ethanol use, drug use, and HIV exposure category. Variables excluded from the final model included niacin use, gender, race, age, current ethanol use, and HIV exposure category.

RESULTS

Of the 881 HIV-positive patients enrolled in the study, 700 (79%) were screened for HCV antibody, with 300 (42.8%) HCV antibody positive and 400 (57.2%) HCV antibody negative. A positive HCV antibody status was independently associated with lower total cholesterol levels (P=0.001) and LDL cholesterol levels (P<0.001) but not with lower HDL cholesterol or triglyceride levels. HCV-positive patients had predicted LDL levels 19 mg/dL lower than those of HCV-negative subjects. HCV infection was also associated with a decreased use of lipid-lowering medication, and protease inhibitor use was associated with increased LDL and total cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection has been associated with lower cholesterol levels in HIV-negative individuals, and the same appears to be true with HIV-infected patients. This is an interesting finding given that HCV particles bind to LDL receptors in vitro and also because HCV-lipid interactions appear to be important in the HCV replication cycle.

Measuring dyspepsia-related health in randomized trials: the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA) and its use in treatment with NSAIDs and COX-2-specific inhibitors

Dyspepsia is a common problem that is important from the perspectives of both patient health and economics. While there has been variability in the definitions used to describe dyspepsia, there have also been few standardized outcomes tools designed to measure dyspepsia-related health, especially in relation to changes in dyspepsia over time. An evaluative tool was developed, the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (SODA), which takes into account the multidimensional nature of dyspepsia using three scales (Pain, Non-pain Symptoms, and Satisfaction with Dyspepsia-related Health) and demonstrates good psychometric properties with respect to validity, reliability and sensitivity to change in the measurement of dyspepsia-related health. Although originally developed for the assessment of uninvestigated dyspepsia, the validation of SODA for use in clinical trials suggested its ability to compare treatment effects of non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors. In comparative trials of celecoxib or valdecoxib with non-specific NSAIDs, COX-2-specific inhibitors were demonstrated to have superior dyspepsia tolerability than non-specific NSAIDs. These data demonstrate that SODA is an effective instrument for measuring dyspepsia-related health with a broad range of applications.

Extraesophageal associations of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children without neurologic defects

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The potential association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and extraesophageal manifestations remains unknown in children without neurological defects. We conducted a large case-control study to examine the association between GERD and several upper and lower respiratory disorders in these children.

METHODS

We identified all patients between 2 and 18 years of age with GERD who were seen at Texas Children's Hospital between 1996 and 2000. Patients seen during the same time period without GERD were randomly selected as controls (4:1 ratio). Patients with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, or congenital esophageal anomalies were excluded. We compared the presence of several predefined upper and lower respiratory disorders in cases and controls.

RESULTS

We identified 1980 patients with GERD and 7920 controls without GERD. Cases and controls were without neurological deficits or congenital esophageal anomalies. Cases were older than controls (9.2 years +/- 4.6 vs. 8.6 +/- 4.9, P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be female (51.2% vs. 47.2%, P = 0.0028) and white (60.2% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.0001). Compared with controls in univariate analyses, cases with GERD had more sinusitis (4.2% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.0001), laryngitis (0.7% vs. 0.2%), asthma (13.2% vs. 6.8%, P < 0.0001), pneumonia (6.3% vs. 2.3%, P < 0.0001), and bronchiectasis (1.0% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.0001). However, otitis media was less common in cases than controls (2.1% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.0001). After adjusting for differences in age, gender, and ethnicity in the regression analyses, GERD remained a significant risk factor for sinusitis (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.7-3.2; P < 0.0001), laryngitis (OR, 2.6; CI, 1.2-5.6; P = 0.0228), asthma (OR, 1.9; CI, 1.6-2.3; P < 0.0001), pneumonia (OR, 2.3; CI, 1.8-2.9; P < 0.0001), and bronchiectasis (OR, 2.3; CI, 1.1-4.6; P = 0.0193).

CONCLUSIONS

GERD in children without neurological defects is associated with a several-fold increase in the risk of sinusitis, laryngitis, asthma, pneumonia, and bronchiectasis. Further studies are needed to examine whether a cause-effect relationship exists between GERD and these disorders in children.

Veterans aging cohort three-site study (VACS 3): overview and description

Outcomes for middle-aged and older individuals with HIV infection are poor, and are likely to be mediated by age-related differences in risks and resources (access to care, relationship with the provider, comorbid conditions, health habits, and changes brought about by aging). The goal of the Veterans Aging Cohort Three-Site Study (VACS 3) is to study the influence of age and mediating factors on outcomes with HIV in order to identify mutable mediators of poorer outcomes. VACS 3 is an observational, longitudinal study. Data sources include patient and provider surveys and electronic medical data collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up from the Infections Disease Clinics at three Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (Cleveland, OH, Houston, TX, and Manhattan, NY). Trained Survey Coordinators at each site determined which patients are HIV infected, obtained consent, and asked the patient to complete a questionnaire. The primary provider also completed a questionnaire. Twelve-month follow-up will be completed July 2001. Of all veterans with HIV seen in these clinics 85% (881) have consented and enrolled. Of the 881 corresponding provider surveys, 92% were completed. Mean age is 49; 55% are African-American; 38% of the sample were men who have sex with men; and less than 2% are women. Almost a third (32%) have been without a permanent address. Complimentary or alternative therapies are common as are the use of cigarettes, alcohol, and illicit drugs. The majority (87%) of the patients are taking multiple antiretroviral medications. The median CD4 count is 331 mm(3), and the median viral load was 714 copies/ml. There is substantial variation by site. Veterans with HIV infection have characteristics that will likely become more prevalent among HIV-infected persons in the United States: they are older, commonly suffer comorbid disease, and are members of minority populations. VACS 3 may help inform the design of future clinical interventions to improve outcomes for people aging with HIV.

General medical and psychiatric comorbidity among HIV-infected veterans in the post-HAART era

We examined the prevalence of HIV, general medical, and psychiatric comorbidities by age based on a recent multisite cohort of HIV infected veterans receiving care: the Veterans with HIV/AIDS 3 Site Study (VACS 3). VACS 3 includes 881 adult patients with HIV infection enrolled between June 1999 and July 2000. Providers reported their patients' CDC-defined HIV comorbidities, general medical comorbidities (based on Duke and Charlson comorbidity scales), and psychiatric comorbidity. Mean age of participants was 49 years and 54% were African-American. The most common HIV comorbidities were oral candidiasis (21%), peripheral neuropathy (16%), and herpes zoster (16%). The most common general medical comorbidities included chemical hepatitis (53%), hypertension (24%), and hyperlipidemia (17%). The mean number of HIV and general medical comorbidities experienced by patients were respectively 1.1 and 1.4 (P < .001). Older (> or = 50 years) HIV-infected patients experienced a greater number of general medical comorbidities than those < 50 years (respectively 1.7 versus 1.2, P < .001). There was no significant difference in mean HIV comorbidity number by age. Based on patient report, 46% had significant depressive symptoms (> or = 10 on 10-item CES-D) and 21% reported at-risk drinking (> or = 8 on AUDIT). Providers reported 32% of patients had anxiety, 4% mania, 4% schizophrenia, and 11% cognitive impairment/dementia. General medical and psychiatric comorbidities constituted a higher disease burden for HIV-infected veterans than HIV comorbidities. Whether these comorbidities are due to antiretroviral drug toxicity or are age or lifestyle-associated conditions, the substantial prevalence of these "non-HIV" comorbidities suggest an important role for general medical and psychiatric management of HIV-infected patients.

Development and validation of a self-completed HIV symptom index

Traditional, open-ended provider questions regarding patient symptoms are insensitive. Better methods are needed to measure symptoms for clinical management, patient-oriented research, and adverse drug-event reporting. Our objective was to develop and initially validate a brief, self-reported HIV symptom index tailored to patients exposed to multidrug antiretroviral therapies and protease inhibitors, and to compare the new index to existing symptom measures. The research design was a multistage design including quantitative review of existing literature, qualitative and quantitative analyses of pilot data, and quantitative analyses of a prospective sample. Statistical analyses include frequencies, chi-square tests for significance, linear and logistic regression. The subjects were from a multisite convenience sample (n = 73) within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group and a prospective sample from the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (n = 115). Measures were patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life, physician-assessed disease severity, CD4 cell count, and HIV-1 RNA viral quantification. A 20-item, self-completed HIV symptom index was developed based upon prior reports of symptom frequency and bother and expert opinion. When compared with prior measures the index included more frequent and bothersome symptoms, yet was easier to use (self-report rather than provider interview). The index required less than 5 minutes to complete, achieved excellent completion rates, and was thought comprehensive and comprehensible in a convenience sample. It was further tested in a prospective sample of patients and demonstrated strong associations with physical and mental health summary scores and with disease severity. These associations were independent of CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA viral quantification. This 20-item HIV symptom index has demonstrated construct validity, and offers a simple and rational approach to measuring HIV symptoms for clinical management, patient-oriented research, and adverse drug reporting.

Using the national registry of HIV-infected veterans in research: lessons for the development of disease registries

Disease-specific registries have many important applications in epidemiologic, clinical and health services research. Since 1989 the Department of Veterans Affairs has maintained a national HIV registry. VA's HIV registry is national in scope, it contains longitudinal data and detailed resource utilization and clinical information. To describe the structure, function, and limitations of VA's national HIV registry, and to test its accuracy and completeness. The VA's national HIV registry contains data that are electronically extracted from VA's computerized comprehensive clinical and administrative databases, called Veterans Integrated Health Systems Technology and Architecture (VISTA). We examined the number of AIDS patients and the number of new patients identified to the registry, by year, through December 1996. We verified data elements against information obtained from the medical records at five VA sites. By December 1996, 40,000 HIV-infected patients had been identified to the registry. We encountered missing data and problems with data classification. Missing data occurred for some elements related to the computer programming that creates the registry (e.g., pharmacy files), and for other elements because manual entry is required (e.g., ethnicity). Lack of a standardized data classification system was a problem, especially for the pharmacy and laboratory files. In using VA's national HIV registry we have learned important lessons, which, if taken into account in the future, could lead to the creation of model disease-specific registries.

SODA (severity of dyspepsia assessment): a new effective outcome measure for dyspepsia-related health

The aim of this research was to develop and evaluate an instrument for measuring dyspepsia-related health to serve as the primary outcome measure for randomized clinical trials. Building on our previous work we developed SODA (Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment), a multidimensional dyspepsia measure. We evaluated SODA by administering it at enrollment and seven follow-up visits to 98 patients with dyspepsia who were randomized to a 6-week course of omeprazole versus placebo and followed over 1 year. The mean age was 53 years, and six patients (6%) were women. Median Cronbach's alpha reliability estimates over the eight visits for the SODA Pain Intensity, Non-Pain Symptoms, and Satisfaction scales were 0.97, 0.90, and 0.92, respectively. The mean change scores for all three scales discriminated between patients who reported they were improved versus those who were unchanged, providing evidence of validity. The effect sizes for the Pain Intensity (.98) and Satisfaction (.87) scales were large, providing evidence for responsiveness. The effect size for the Non-Pain Symptoms scale was small (.24), indicating lower responsiveness in this study sample. SODA is a new, effective instrument for measuring dyspepsia-related health. SODA is multidimensional and responsive to clinically meaningful change with demonstrated reliability and validity.

Increased numbers of women, older individuals, and Blacks receive health care for dyspepsia in the United States

GOALS

The objectives of this research were to use a national probability sample of the U.S. population to determine the demographic characteristics of individuals who obtained care for dyspepsia, to compare these demographic characteristics with those of the U.S. population, and to describe the amount of health care that these individuals received.

STUDY

We analyzed data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey, which is based on a national probability sample of the U.S. adult population.

RESULTS

Approximately 3.6 million individuals, or 2% of U.S. adults, obtained care for dyspepsia. Compared with the U.S. population, a predominance of women, individuals 65 years or older, and African Americans obtained care for dyspepsia. Expenditures for health care totaled $2.5 billion.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the major impact of dyspepsia on U.S. health care resources, a critical issue facing investigators is to identify the most cost-effective approach to managing these patients.

Clinical importance of provider-reported HIV symptoms compared with patient-report

BACKGROUND

Although the patient experiences the symptoms, only symptoms that providers recognize and report "count" in most clinical and research settings. Reliance upon provider-report has been justified by the claim that providers report only "clinically important" symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether provider-reported symptoms constitute a more "clinically important" subset of patient-reported symptoms in HIV infection.

DESIGN

Secondary analyses of AIDS Clinical Trials 175 (ACTG 175), a randomized controlled trial of combination antiviral therapy among patients with moderate HIV disease.

SETTING

Large, multicenter study.

PATIENTS

1,262 patients who participated in the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) sub-study and for whom providers completed symptom forms.

MEASUREMENTS

Patient- and provider-reported symptoms, HRQOL, risk of recent hospitalization, survival, CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels.

RESULTS

On average, providers reported 3-fold fewer symptoms than patients did, but the degree of under report varied by symptom. When patient-reports were used as a gold standard, provider-reports demonstrated poor sensitivity (mean 0.25) and good specificity (mean 0.96). Agreement beyond chance was fair (mean kappa 0.35) and did not improve when weighted by symptom severity. Site specific variation was greater for provider than for patient-reported symptoms (R2: 0.15 and 0.05 respectively). Patient-reported symptoms were substantially more strongly associated with the physical health scale and all HRQOL subscales than provider-reported symptoms (P <0.0001). Patient-reported symptoms were equally strongly associated with survival (P >0.50) and recent hospitalization as provider-reported symptoms (P >0.48). Of note, patient-reported symptoms were independently associated with survival and recent hospitalization after adjustment for CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Provider-reported symptoms are not a more clinically important subset of patient-reported symptoms. Patient-reported symptom checklists are likely to be more complete and more strongly associated with HRQOL. Further, patient-reported symptoms are as related to recent hospitalization and survival as provider-reported symptoms. An HIV specific, patient-completed symptom checklist might substantially improve symptom reporting for adverse drug event monitoring, clinical management and medical research.

Costs of managing Helicobacter pylori-infected ulcer patients after initial therapy

BACKGROUND

The objective of this research was to evaluate the outcomes and costs of alternative approaches to managing patients previously treated for peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic model was used to compare (1a) urease breath testing (UBT) for assessment of H. pylori status versus (1b) observation without further testing or treatment, among patients who were symptom-free following initial antimicrobial and antisecretory therapy for endoscopically demonstrated ulcer and H. pylori infection; and (2a) UBT versus (2b) repeat endoscopy with H. pylori testing, and versus (2c) repeat antimicrobial and antisecretory therapy without further testing, among patients who remained symptomatic following initial therapy.

RESULTS

Among patients who were symptom free after initial therapy, 6.1% receiving UBT had symptomatic ulcer at one year, compared to 18.2% of those simply observed. The expected first-year cost per symptom-free patient following initial therapy was $591 for UBT compared to $480 for observation. Among patients with persistent symptoms after initial therapy, 21% receiving repeat therapy had symptomatic ulcer at one year, compared to 23.8% receiving repeat endoscopy, and 23.3% receiving UBT. Corresponding medical costs per patient were, respectively, $766, $1787 and $1122.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal approach to managing patients following initial treatment for ulcer and H. pylori infection depends on symptom status following initial therapy. For symptomatic patients, the preferred approach is to prescribe a repeat course of antimicrobial and antisecretory therapy. For patients without symptoms following initial therapy, UBT is the preferred approach because it is associated with a threefold lower risk of symptomatic ulcer at one year, although it costs an additional $110 per patient, compared with observation.

Clinical and socioeconomic determinants of health care use among HIV-infected patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs

This study estimates the impact of clinical and socioeconomic characteristics on health care use for HIV-infected patients. Data come from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) HIV Registry, which electronically extracts data from patients' automated medical records, and from patient interviews. Unlike prior studies, this analysis includes a staging system incorporating CD4 count and AIDS-defining diagnoses. Results showed that clinical factors were the most important determinants of health care use; socioeconomic variables were seldom significant. These findings were expected, since the VA is an equal access system, providing care regardless of socioeconomic status.

How good are US studies of HIV costs of care?

BACKGROUND

Valid, timely estimates of the costs of HIV care are needed by health planners and policy makers.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a methodologic critique of published estimates of resource utilization and costs of HIV care.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE database for 1990-1998.

DATA SELECTION

Included articles focused on adults with a spectrum of HIV disease in which the authors developed their own resource use and cost data. Thirty one articles met these criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were compared based on: (1) utilization and cost estimates, in 1995 dollars; (2) study period; (3) research design; (4) sampling frame; (5) sample size and patient characteristics; (6) data sources and scope of services; and (7) methods used in the analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The most recent estimates pertain to the first half of 1995, before the use of protease inhibitor therapy. We found wide variations in the estimates and identified three major sources for this: (1) patient samples that were restricted to subgroups of the national HIV-infected population; (2) utilization data that were limited in scope (e.g., inpatient care only); and (3) invalid methods for estimating annual or lifetime costs, particularly in dealing with decedents.

CONCLUSIONS

To accurately estimate resource use and costs for HIV care nationwide, a nationally representative probability sample of HIV-infected patients is required. Even in research that is not intended to provide national estimates, the scope of utilization data should be broadened and greater attention to methodologic issues in the analysis of annual and lifetime costs is needed.

Sensitivity, specificity, reliability, and clinical validity of provider-reported symptoms: a comparison with self-reported symptoms. Outcomes Committee of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group

BACKGROUND

If symptoms are to be recognized and effectively addressed in clinical research, they must be collected using sensitive, specific, reliable, and clinically meaningful methods.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comparison of self-administered symptom survey data with data from conventional provider-reports.

DESIGN/METHODS

Secondary data analysis of AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 081 (ACTG 081), a randomized trial taking place in 33 sites comparing three approaches to prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii-related pneumonia that found no difference among treatment arms. The study was performed on 842 subjects with advanced HIV infection. No intervention was undertaken as a result of this study. ACTG 081 included data on functional status, global quality of life and survival, and two methods of symptom measurement: an open-ended, provider-reported symptom assessment (provider-report) and a self-administered symptom survey (self-report). Agreement was measured using kappa scores. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using self-report as the standard. Reliability was measured by intersite variation and test-retest reliability (8 weeks later). Clinical validity was evaluated by testing expected associations with functional status, global quality of life, and survival.

RESULTS

Symptom data were available for 808 patients (96%). Patient and provider agreement was poor (mean kappa, 0.14; range, 0.07-0.25). Compared with self-report, providers underreported the presence and severity of symptoms (mean symptom count, 5.2 versus 1.3; mean severity score, 1.3 versus 0.74). provider-report demonstrated greater variability by site (R2 associated with site, 0.02 versus 0.16) and poorer test-retest reliability (mean kappa, 0.34 versus 0.25). Provider-report severity scores were less strongly associated than were self-report with functional status (chi2, 252 versus 80), global quality of life (R2 for model, 0.57 versus 0.15), and survival (chi2, 38 versus 24). Self-reported symptom severity was strongly correlated to patient-reported global quality of life (p, 0.75; p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Provider-reported symptoms as currently collected within the ACTG are less sensitive and reproducible than a self-administered symptom survey. Provider-reported severity scores are also more weakly associated with functional status, global quality of life, and survival. A self-reported symptom survey may provide a better method of symptom measurement for HIV research.

Evaluation of a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia-related health for use in a randomized clinical trial

In previous work, we developed a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia-related health. To evaluate the adequacy of this instrument as an outcome measure for a large-scale, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we used Rasch analysis to address three questions: (1) Are the scales interval-level? (2) Do the scales measure precisely across the entire range of dyspepsia outcomes? (3) Do the scales' items have an optimal number of response categories? We found that the scales were not interval-level and that they did not measure effectively at low or high levels of the dyspepsia-related outcomes. Our results also suggest that patients were capable of discriminating among only four- to seven-item response categories. Further studies are needed to identify items that effectively measure high and low levels of dyspepsia-related outcomes and to validate that decreasing the number of response categories improves the psychometric properties of these scales.

The effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia: a qualitative systematic review

PURPOSE

Dyspepsia is a common primary care condition, yet its optimal management is poorly defined. We reviewed the literature to answer the following questions about patients with dyspepsia: 1) Does endoscopy result in improved patient outcomes? 2) Does endoscopy result in a reduction in the use of subsequent medical resources? 3) Does endoscopy result in improved medical decision making? 4) Is endoscopy cost effective?

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of English-language articles in the MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, and EMBASE computerized bibliographic databases from January 1985 to July 1998. We included all studies, including decision analyses, with information about the effectiveness of endoscopy, as measured by its impact on patient outcomes, resource utilization, clinical decision making, or cost effectiveness. Two independent reviewers abstracted data from each study, and assessed its methodologic quality.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. For 3 of the 4 clinical questions, the weight of evidence does not support the effectiveness of endoscopy. The largest randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopy with empiric therapy demonstrates equivalent symptoms and quality of life at 1 year, with increased patient satisfaction and lower costs for initial endoscopy. Suboptimal study design, including lack of appropriate comparison groups, limit studies measuring the impact of endoscopy on resource utilization and decision-making. Decision analyses indicate that noninvasive H pylori testing followed by anti-H pylori therapy or empiric antisecretory therapy is more cost effective than initial endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of one randomized clinical trial, the preponderance of available data does not support the effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia. Prospective clinical trials that evaluate patient outcomes and resource utilization, and take H pylori status into account, are needed to determine the effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia.

Managing dyspepsia: what do we know and what do we need to know?

OBJECTIVE

The conceptual revolution concerning the role of Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease has raised the larger question of how to integrate this new information into the management of patients with dyspepsia. The aim of this research was to critically evaluate current knowledge about dyspepsia and its management.

METHODS

Relevant articles on dyspepsia were identified from MEDLINE searches and from the bibliographies of identified articles. Studies that contained information on the prevalence of dyspepsia, endoscopic findings, and evaluations of alternative management strategies were reviewed.

RESULTS

By coupling H. pylori serological testing with clinical factors such as age and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use, strategies have been developed that identify patients with organic disease. Although the use of these strategies can reduce the volume of endoscopies, their effects on dyspepsia symptoms are unknown. Computerized decision analysis models have been used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies. The indirect evidence obtained from these models suggests that empiric therapy, guided by H. pylori testing, may be the preferred approach. However, the models have been hampered by the lack of information concerning dyspepsia symptoms, the primary health outcome of the majority of patients seen in primary practice settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the knowledge needed to integrate H. pylori tests and antimicrobial therapies into the management of patients with dyspepsia in primary practice settings has not been developed. A pressing need exists for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate alternative management strategies. In conducting such a trial, valid, reliable instruments for measuring dyspepsia will be needed.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating nutrition counseling with or without oral supplementation in malnourished HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of nutrition counseling with or without oral supplementation in malnourished patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SUBJECTS

HIV-infected men (n=118) who were less than 90% of usual weight for height or who had lost more than 10% of body weight.

INTERVENTION

Nutrition counseling alone (control group) vs nutrition counseling plus enteral supplementation (supplement group) for 6 weeks. All patients were instructed to consume a diet that exceeded estimated total energy expenditure by 960 kcal/day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Weight, skinfold thickness, fat-free mass, grip strength, quality of life, and cognitive function (Buschke test).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Differences in baseline variables and outcomes were evaluated using analysis of variance or the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine men completed at least 4 weeks of treatment, 49 in the supplement group and 50 in the control group. Half the patients in each treatment group achieved at least 80% of their energy target. No differences in weight, skinfold thickness measurements, or quality of life were observed. Compared with the control group, the supplement group had larger increases in fat-free mass and grip strength, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.

APPLICATIONS

In the short term, nutrition counseling with or without oral supplementation can achieve a substantial increase in energy intake in about 50% of malnourished HIV-infected patients. Although further study is needed to evaluate long-term effects, these findings suggest that nutrition counseling has an important role in the management of malnourished HIV-infected patients.

Dyspepsia: how should we measure it?

This study developed and validated a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia. A questionnaire was administered to 126 patients with dyspepsia who presented for care at a VA outpatient clinic and a family physician's private office. Dyspepsia-specific health was measured by self-report using: (1) an existing dyspepsia scale that produces an aggregate score by summing ratings across pain and non-pain symptoms; (2) adaptations of two scales originally designed to measure back pain; and (3) a new scale measuring satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. Generic health was measured using the SF-36. Results from factor analysis revealed four dimensions of dyspepsia-related health: pain intensity, pain disability, non-pain symptoms, and satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. After refinements, scales representing the four dimensions conformed to psychometric standards for reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. The importance of measuring dyspepsia using a multidimensional approach was confirmed by demonstrating that classification of dyspepsia severity depended on the dimension that was assessed. We conclude that dyspepsia is best measured using a multidimensional approach.

Predicting outcomes in HIV-infected veterans: II. Survival after AIDS

This article (Part II) and the preceding article (Part I) report the development of two clinical staging systems for HIV-infected individuals. The objective of the research reported here (Part II) was to construct a clinical staging system to predict survival in patients with AIDS. We analyzed data from VA Cooperative Study Number 298, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial that compared immediate versus deferred zidovudine therapy in HIV-infected individuals. Baseline variables obtained at the onset of AIDS in 204 individuals were tested in univariate Cox regression for their relationship to survival, and those that appeared predictive were examined in multivariable analysis. Based on these analyses, we constructed a new AIDS Clinical Staging System. The system is based on age, CD4+ cell count, type of first AIDS-defining condition, and functional status. The stages of the system were significant predictors of survival (p = 0.0001, log-rank test). In conclusion, valid, simple clinical staging systems for patients with AIDS can be developed based on a few variables that are readily available in clinical settings.

Predicting outcomes in HIV-infected veterans: I. Progression to AIDS

This article and the following article (Parts I and II) report the development of two clinical staging systems for HIV-infected individuals. The objective of the research reported here (Part I) was to construct a clinical staging system to predict progression to AIDS. We analyzed data from VA Cooperative Study Number 298, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial that compared immediate versus deferred zidovudine therapy in 338 HIV-infected individuals who did not have AIDS at enrollment. Baseline variables were tested in univariate Cox regression for their relationship to progression to AIDS, and those that appeared predictive were examined in multivariable analysis. Based on these analyses, we constructed a new clinical staging system based on CD4+ cell count, age, hemoglobin, oral hairy leukoplakia or oral thrush, and fever. The stages of the system were significant predictors of progression to AIDS (p = 0.0001, log-rank test). In conclusion, simple, valid, clinical staging systems for HIV-infected patients can be constructed using information that is readily available in clinical practice settings. Such systems provide better prognostic distinction than CD4+ cell count alone by taking into account the known prognostic effects of other variables.