1
|
Brouwers MC, Vukmirovic M, Spithoff K, Zwaal C, McNair S, Peek N. Engaging cancer patients in clinical practice guideline development: a pilot study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:250-256. [PMID: 30111965 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Patient engagement is a key quality component of cancer guideline development; however, the optimal strategy for engaging patients in guideline development remains unclear. The feasibility and efficacy of two patient engagement models was tested by Cancer Care Ontario's cancer guideline development program, the Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). Methods In model 1, patients participated in the guideline development process as active members of a working group. In model 2, patients formed a separate consultation group to review project plans and recommendations generated by multiple working groups. Training included online resources (model 1) and an in-person orientation (model 2). The pebc's standard patient engagement process acted as a control. The study was conducted for 1 year. Surveys measured the satisfaction of patients and members of the guideline working groups with the process and the outcome of each model. Results Three guideline projects used model 1 to engage patients, six projects used model 2 to receive feedback, and one project was used as a control group (14 patients total). Most participants, whatever the model, reported satisfaction with their experience. Key challenges to implementation included patient recruitment and long wait times between meetings (model 1), and difficulty focusing on the discussion topic and poor meeting attendance on the part of patients (model 2). Conclusions The pilot study demonstrated that, although both models are feasible and effective for the engagement of patients in cancer guideline development, modifications are required to optimize their continued interest. The pebc will use the study results to inform the implementation of a patient engagement strategy for its program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Brouwers
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton.,Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton; and
| | - M Vukmirovic
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton
| | - K Spithoff
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton
| | - C Zwaal
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton; and
| | - S McNair
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton; and
| | - N Peek
- Person-Centred Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone J, Loblaw A, Petrella T, Guideline Development Group TEFPWC. Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This systematic review was completed by the Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development Group, a group organized by Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). It provides background and guidance for clinicians with respect to exercise for people living with cancer in active and post treatment. It focuses on the benefits of specific types of exercise, pre-screening requirements for new referrals, safety concerns, and delivery models.Methods Using the pebc’s standardized approach, medline and embase were systematically searched for existing guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary literature.Results The search identified two guidelines, eighteen systematic reviews, and twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with relevance to the topic. The present review provides conclusions about the duration, frequency, and intensity of exercise appropriate for people living with cancer.Conclusions The evidence shows that exercise is safe and provides benefit in quality of life and in muscular and aerobic fitness for people with cancer both during and after treatment. The evidence is sufficient to support the promotion of exercise for adults with cancer, and some evidence supports the promotion of exercise in group or supervised settings and for a long period of time to improve quality of life and muscular and aerobic fitness. Exercise at moderate intensities could also be sustainable for longer periods and could encourage exercise to be continued over an individual’s lifetime. It is important that a pre-screening assessment be conducted to evaluate the effects of disease, treatments, and comorbidities.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review was completed by the Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development Group, a group organized by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). It provides background and guidance for clinicians with respect to exercise for people living with cancer in active and post treatment. It focuses on the benefits of specific types of exercise, pre-screening requirements for new referrals, safety concerns, and delivery models. METHODS Using the pebc's standardized approach, medline and embase were systematically searched for existing guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary literature. RESULTS The search identified two guidelines, eighteen systematic reviews, and twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with relevance to the topic. The present review provides conclusions about the duration, frequency, and intensity of exercise appropriate for people living with cancer. CONCLUSIONS The evidence shows that exercise is safe and provides benefit in quality of life and in muscular and aerobic fitness for people with cancer both during and after treatment. The evidence is sufficient to support the promotion of exercise for adults with cancer, and some evidence supports the promotion of exercise in group or supervised settings and for a long period of time to improve quality of life and muscular and aerobic fitness. Exercise at moderate intensities could also be sustainable for longer periods and could encourage exercise to be continued over an individual's lifetime. It is important that a pre-screening assessment be conducted to evaluate the effects of disease, treatments, and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Segal
- Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa
| | - C Zwaal
- McMaster University, Hamilton
| | - E Green
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto
| | | | - A Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Research Program, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barbera L, Zwaal C, Elterman D, McPherson K, Wolfman W, Katz A, Matthew A. Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer. Curr Oncol 2017; 24:192-200. [PMID: 28680280 PMCID: PMC5486385 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexual dysfunction in people with cancer is a significant problem. The present clinical practice guideline makes recommendations to improve sexual function in people with cancer. METHODS This guideline was undertaken by the Interventions to Address Sexual Problems in People with Cancer Expert Panel, a group organized by the Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). Consistent with the pebc standardized approach, a systematic search was conducted for existing guidelines, and the literature in medline and embase for the years 2003-2015 was systematically searched for both systematic reviews and primary literature. Evidence found for men and for women was evaluated separately, and no restrictions were placed on cancer type or study design. Content and methodology experts performed an internal review of the resulting draft recommendations, which was followed by an external review by targeted experts and intended users. RESULTS The search identified 4 existing guidelines, 13 systematic reviews, and 103 studies with relevance to the topic. The present guideline provides one overarching recommendation concerning the discussion of sexual health and dysfunction, which is aimed at all people with cancer. Eleven additional recommendations made separately for men and women deal with issues such as sexual response, body image, intimacy and relationships, overall sexual functioning and satisfaction, and vasomotor and genital symptoms. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge this clinical practice guideline is the first to comprehensively evaluate interventions for the improvement of sexual problems in people with cancer. The guideline will be a valuable resource to support practitioners and clinics in addressing sexuality in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Barbera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - C. Zwaal
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton
| | - D. Elterman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - K. McPherson
- Patient and Family Advisory Council, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton; and
| | - W. Wolfman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; and
| | - A. Katz
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - A. Matthew
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - The Interventions to Address Sexual Problems in People with Cancer Guideline Development Group
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto
- Patient and Family Advisory Council, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton; and
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; and
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barbera L, Zwaal C, Elterman D, Wolfman W, Katz A, McPherson K, Matthew A. EP-1415: Interventions to Address Sexual Problems in People with Cancer. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)31850-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
6
|
Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone JR, Loblaw A, Petrella T. Exercise for people with cancer: a clinical practice guideline. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:40-46. [PMID: 28270724 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development of this guideline was undertaken by the Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development Group, a group organized by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). The purpose of the guideline was to provide guidance for clinicians with respect to exercise for patients living with cancer, focusing on the benefits of specific types of exercise, recommendations about screening requirements for new referrals, and safety concerns. METHODS Consistent with the pebc's standardized approach, a systematic search was conducted for existing guidelines, and systematic literature searches were performed in medline and embase for both systematic reviews and primary literature. Content and methodology experts performed an internal review, which was followed by an external review by targeted experts and intended users. RESULTS The search identified three guidelines, eighteen systematic reviews, and twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with relevance to the topic. The present guideline provides recommendations for the duration, frequency, and intensity of exercise appropriate for people living with cancer. It also provides recommendations for pre-exercise assessment, safety concerns, and delivery models. CONCLUSIONS There is sufficient evidence to show that exercise provides benefits in quality of life and muscular and aerobic fitness for people with cancer both during and after treatment, and that it does not cause harm. The present guideline is intended to support the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology's Canadian physical activity guidelines. The recommendations are intended for clinicians and institutions treating cancer patients in Ontario, and for policymakers and program planners involved in the delivery of exercise programs for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Segal
- Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa
| | - C Zwaal
- McMaster University, Hamilton
| | - E Green
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto
| | | | - A Loblaw
- Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Odette Cancer Research Program, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto; and
| | - T Petrella
- ncic Melanoma Clinical Trials Group, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tomasone J, Zwaal C, Kim G, Yuen D, Sussman J, Segal R. Moving Guidelines into Action: A Report from Cancer Care Ontario’s Event Let’s Get Moving: Exercise and Rehabilitation for Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The need for an improved understanding of the rehabilitation services landscape in Ontario and for promotion of Cancer Care Ontario’s newly developed Exercise for People with Cancer guideline brought Cancer Care Ontario’s Psychosocial Oncology and Survivorship Programs together to host a knowledge translation and exchange event. The primary objectives of the event were to understand recommendations from Cancer Care Ontario’s new exercise guideline, to discuss key considerations and determine strategies for the implementation of the guideline recommendations, and to explore the current state and future directions of cancer rehabilitation in Ontario. The event was attended by 124 stakeholders, including clinicians, allied health care professionals, administrators, patients, community partners, and academics representing each of the 13 regional cancer programs in Ontario. Attendees participated in two small-group activities that focused on determining the best approach for implementing the guideline recommendations into practice and discussing current barriers and the future state of cancer rehabilitation in Ontario. The activities allowed for networking and collaboration between attendees. The event provided an opportunity for the Psychosocial Oncology and Survivorship Programs to learn about the types of goals and plans that could be feasible in implementing the guideline in each region, and about ways to prioritize gaps in access to rehabilitation services and the types of implementation strategies that might be used to address the gaps. Overall, attendees were highly satisfied with the event, and the findings are being used to help inform research and practice activities with respect to guideline implementation and rehabilitation practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rabeneck L, Rumble RB, Axler J, Smith A, Armstrong D, Vinden C, Belliveau P, Rhodes K, Zwaal C, Mai V, Dixon P. Cancer Care Ontario Colonoscopy Standards: standards and evidentiary base. Can J Gastroenterol 2007; 21 Suppl D:5D-24D. [PMID: 18026582 PMCID: PMC2802327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cause of non-tobacco-related cancer deaths in Canadian men and women, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths. An estimated 7800 men and women will be diagnosed with CRC, and 3250 will die from the disease in Ontario in 2007. Given that CRC incidence and mortality rates in Ontario are among the highest in the world, the best opportunity to reduce this burden of disease would be through screening. The present report describes the findings and recommendations of Cancer Care Ontario's Colonoscopy Standards Expert Panel, which was convened in March 2006 by the Program in Evidence-Based Care. The recommendations will form the basis of the quality assurance program for colonoscopy delivered in support of Ontario's CRC screening program.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Hemodynamic responses to an anger interview and cognitive and physical stressors were compared, and the stability of associated hemodynamic reactions examined. Participants experienced control, handgrip, counting, and mental arithmetic tests and an anger interview on two occasions. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output were measured. Total peripheral resistance was also derived. The anger interview produced larger, more sustained changes in blood pressure in both sessions than the other stressors. These changes were largely a consequence of increased peripheral resistance. Consistent with previous findings, handgrip was associated with a resistance-type reaction whereas arithmetic was associated with a cardiac output-type reaction. There was low-to-modest stability of hemodynamic reactions to the interview. Further research is necessary to optimize its utility in studies of cardiovascular function. Nevertheless, the findings underscore the ability of ecologically relevant stressors to provoke unique configurations of cardiovascular activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Prkachin
- Psychology Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Studies of emotion have provided occasional support for physiological differentiation of affective states; however, the evidence has been inconsistent. The aims of the present study were to investigate cardiovascular changes associated with relived experiences of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust and to examine the utility of methods designed to optimize the induction of emotional responses. Thirty-four undergraduates who scored 0.5 sd above the mean on Larsen and Diener's Affect Intensity Measure described their most intense experiences of five emotions. These descriptions were then used to induce those emotions while blood pressure and other hemodynamic measures were monitored. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and stroke volume differentiated among emotions. The results support the suggestion that cardiovascular activity differentiates emotional states and provide some insight into the physiological adjustments subserving such effects. The study demonstrates a method that may be applied to studies of discrete emotions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Prkachin
- Psychology Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|