Gender and other survival predictors in patients with metastatic melanoma on Southwest Oncology Group trials

Clinical predictors of survival in real world practice in stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

While studies continually identify new clinical prognostic factors in stage IV melanoma, the introduction of targeted and immunotherapies have revolutionised the prognosis of advanced melanoma since 2011. The study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of past and newly identified clinical factors in a contemporary cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of The Canberra Hospital melanoma database identified 161 patients with Stage IV melanoma between 2011 and 2017. Survival was analysed by demographics and clinical factors with chi-square tests to determine significance. Logistic binary regression was performed to test the independence of the clinical factors on predicting the survival outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, the 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month stage IV melanoma survival rate of our cohort was 79%, 67%, 55%, and 45%, respectively. Age, sex, and BRAF mutation status were found to have no impact on survival, whereas M1d category of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging (8th edition), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >3, elevated serum LDH, more than three metastatic sites, brain metastases, poorer Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) status were associated with poorer survival. Binary logistic regression test identified AJCC staging, NLR (cutoff score 3), LDH, and brain metastases as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Most clinical factors investigated in this study were found to have a statistically significant impact on survival, with AJCC (8th edition) staging M1a-M1d, NLR (cutoff score 3), LDH, and brain metastases identified as independent prognostic factors in stage IV melanoma from a contemporary cohort treated with targeted therapies and immunotherapies.

Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma

The incidence of melanoma in the United States has been increasing over the past several decades. Prognosis largely depends on disease stage, with 5-year melanoma-specific survival ranging from as high as 99% in patients with stage I disease to less than 10% for some patients with stage IV (distant metastatic) disease. Fortunately, in the last 5-10 years, there have been remarkable treatment advances for patients with high-risk resectable melanoma, including approval of targeted and immune checkpoint blockade therapies. In addition, results of recent clinical trials have confirmed the importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy and continue to refine the approach to regional lymph node basin management. Lastly, the melanoma staging system was revised in the eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, which was implemented on January 1, 2018. Here we discuss these changes and the clinicopathological features that confer high risk for locoregional and distant disease relapse and poor survival. Implications regarding the management of melanoma in the metastatic and adjuvant settings are discussed, as are future directions for neoadjuvant therapies.

Real-world treatment practice in patients with advanced melanoma

Introduction

The treatment outcomes of patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma were poor before the use of new therapeutic options.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted among 287 patients with unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma treated at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Cracow Branch, from 2013 to 2019. All enrolled patients were treated with immunotherapy (IT; consisting of pembrolizumab/nivolumab, or ipilimumab) or target therapy (TT; consisting of vemurafenib ±cobimetinib or dabrafenib ±trametinib) in at least one treatment line.

Results

mutation was detected in 152 (55%) patients. In general, the majority of patients (92%) were in very good or good condition (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1). Brain metastasis was detected in 64 (22%) patients. Median OS and PFS in the experimental group from the beginning of the first-line treatment were 14.9 and 6.7 months, respectively. Across the study population, as a first-line treatment patients received IT, TT as well as CHT, and the median OS was 19.2, 12.6 and 15.9 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that normal LDH levels, no brain metastases, ECOG 0, and objective response to the treatment were strong predictors of longer OS. For PFS, absence of brain metastases, ECOG 0, and treatment response were found to be predictive factors on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The administration of new therapies for the treatment of patients with advanced/disseminated melanoma significantly prolonged survival in this group of patients. Nevertheless, further studies should be conducted to assess the effectiveness of various sequences of treatment.

Sex-Based Differences in Melanoma Survival in a Contemporary Patient Cohort

Background: A female survival advantage in cutaneous melanoma has been long recognized. However, whether this extends across all age groups, with risk stratification using the latest prognostic staging system or in the current era of efficacious systemic therapies is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated whether sex-based differences in melanoma survival persisted within a recent population-based patient cohort with consideration of these factors. Materials and Methods: We identified stage II-IV cutaneous melanoma patients from 2010 to 2014 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries data. We recalculated stage per American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition guidelines. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of 16,807 patients (39.8% female), 8,990 were stage II, 4,826 stage III, and 2,991 stage IV at diagnosis. Unadjusted 3-/5-year CSS estimates for females versus males were 64.2% versus 59.7%, and 53.5% versus 49.9%, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001. Five-year CSS varied within each stage and across age strata of <45, 45 - 59, and ≥60 years. Within each stage, females <45 had better CSS than all other sex/age groups (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis of stage II/III patients, female sex, younger age, and lower mitotic index retained favorable CSS prognostic significance (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Sex-based differences in melanoma survival persist in a contemporary patient cohort staged with the latest prognostic system. These data may guide decision marking regarding adjuvant therapy, highlight the importance of including sex as a pre-specified clinical trial variable, and suggest that investigation of underlying biologic mechanisms may drive discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve patient care.

Estrogen Receptors and Melanoma: A Review

In the last three decades cutaneous melanoma has been widely investigated as a steroid hormone-sensitive cancer. Following this hypothesis, many epidemiological studies have investigated the relationship between estrogens and melanoma. No evidence to date has supported this association due to the great complexity of genetic, external and environmental factors underlying the development of this cancer. Molecular mechanisms through which estrogen and their receptor exert a role in melanoma genesis are still under investigation with new studies increasingly focusing on the discovery of new molecular targets for therapeutic treatments.

The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: implications for melanoma treatment and care

INTRODUCTION

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system was implemented in the United States on 1 January 2018. Areas covered: This article provides an overview of important changes in the eighth edition AJCC staging system from the seventh edition based on analyses of a large international melanoma database. The clinical implications of these changes for melanoma treatment are also discussed. Expert commentary: A standardized and contemporary cancer staging system that facilitates accurate risk stratification is essential to guide patient treatment. The eighth edition of the AJCC staging system is currently the most widely accepted approach to melanoma staging and classification at initial diagnosis.

Effects of nivolumab in peritoneal carcinamatosis of malign melanoma in mouse model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab and comparison with dacarbazine (DTIC) on peritoneal carcinomatosis of malignant melanoma in mouse model.

METHODS

Mouse skin melanoma cells was injected under the capsule of the peritoneal surface in the left side of the abdomen. On postoperative day ten, mouses randomised into three groups. Group 1: Control, Group 2: HIPEC (Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy) with DTIC and Group 3: HIPEC with Nivolumab. After the sacrification on postoperative day fifteen, peritoneum evaluated macroscopically and histopathologically by using peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS).

RESULTS

In the 15th day exploration, all animals developed extensive intraperitoneal tumor growth in Group 1. In Group 2 and Group 3 median tumor size was 0.7±0.3cm and 0.3±0.2cm respectively (p: 0.023). Peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) were significantly lower in Group 3 than other groups (p: 0.019). The lowest total tumor nodules in group 3 was 4 ± 2. The PGRS score was found significantly lower in Group 3 than other groups (p: 0.03). Lymphocytic response rate was found higher in the Group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been found that nivolumab significantly better than DTIC on peritoneal metastases of malign melanoma in mouse models. Nivolumab treatment gives promising results with pathological evidence in the treatment of metastatic disease of malignant melanoma.

Survival of cutaneous melanoma based on sex, age, and stage in the United States, 1992-2011

Women diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma have a survival advantage compared to men, which has been hypothesized to be due to difference in behavior and/or biology (sex hormones). It remains controversial whether this advantage is dependent on age or stage of disease. We sought to compare melanoma-specific survival between females in pre, peri, and postmenopausal age groups to males in the same age group, adjusting for stage of disease. This is a retrospective population-based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed from 1 January 1992 through 31 January 2011 with primary invasive cutaneous melanoma were included in our cohort. Melanoma-specific survival was the main outcome studied. Of the 106,511 subjects that were included, 45% were female. Females in all age groups (18-45, 46-54, and ≥55) with localized and regional disease, were less likely to die from melanoma compared to males in the same age group. Among patients with localized and regional disease, the relative risk of death due to melanoma increased with advancing age at diagnosis; this increase was more pronounced among females than males. In contrast, we observed no female survival advantage among patients with distant disease and no effect of age on relative risk of death from melanoma. Females with localized and regional melanoma have a decreased risk of death compared to males within all age groups. Our data show no differences in survival between men and women with metastatic melanoma, indicating that the influence of sex on survival is limited to early stage disease but not confined to pre or perimenopausal age groups.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic indicators for metastatic melanoma: data from 446 patients in north China

Melanoma is an extremely rare tumor in Asia. This retrospective study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of metastatic melanoma patients at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital over the last 30 years. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression method using SPSS 19.0 software. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of metastatic melanoma patients were 52, 32, and 16 %, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) 9.0 months, and median disease-free survival 20.3 months. Furthermore, patients with a single metastatic site achieved better OS and PFS than those with two or more metastatic lesions (OS 21.6 vs. 8.9 months, P < 0.001; PFS 11.3 vs. 7.1 months, P < 0.001). Survival times of patients with visceral metastases were the shortest (OS 8.5 months; PFS 7.5 months). Specifically, patients with primary mucosal lesions had a worse OS (9.7 months) and PFS (6.8 months) than those with acral (19.2 and 15.6 months, respectively) or non-acral primary lesions (11.8 and 11.1 months, respectively). The treatment of advanced melanoma was unitary, and prognoses of patients with metastatic melanoma in China were poor. Visceral metastasis, multiple metastatic sites, and primary mucosal lesions were significant predictors of survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. Those with primary mucosal lesions had significantly worse survivals than those with primary cutaneous lesions. More active involvement in clinical studies and more feedback on various treatment options are required.

Principles of Melanoma Staging

Although now commonplace in contemporary cancer care, the systematic approach to classification of disease-specific cancers into a formalized staging system is a relatively modern concept. Overall, the goals of cancer staging are to characterize the status of cancer at a specific moment in time, risk stratify, facilitate prognostication, and inform clinical decision making. The revisions to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system over time reflect changes in our understanding of the biology of the disease. Since the 1st edition, where tumor thickness was defined anatomically by its relationship to the reticular or papillary dermis (Clark level) as well as tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), there have been significant strides in our use of clinicopathological variables to stratify low- versus high-risk patients. Management of the regional nodal basin has also changed dramatically over time, impacted by techniques such as lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and changes in pathological evaluation of the regional lymph nodes. Additionally, stratification of distant metastases has evolved as survival outcomes have been shown to vary based upon anatomic site of metastases and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. The variables in use in the current (7th edition) AJCC staging system are surrogate markers of biology with validated impact of survival outcomes. Going forward, it is likely that these and additional clinicopathological factors will be integrated with molecular and other correlates of melanoma tumor biology to further refine and personalize melanoma staging.

PD-1 pathway inhibitors: the next generation of immunotherapy for advanced melanoma

Checkpoint inhibitors are revolutionizing treatment options and expectations for patients with melanoma. Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), was the first approved checkpoint inhibitor. Emerging long-term data indicate that approximately 20% of ipilimumab-treated patients achieve long-term survival. The first programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, pembrolizumab, was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of melanoma; nivolumab was previously approved in Japan. PD-1 inhibitors are also poised to become standard of care treatment for other cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibition is a different treatment approach to chemotherapy and targeted agents: instead of directly acting on the tumor to induce tumor cell death, checkpoint inhibitors enhance or de novo stimulate antitumor immune responses to eliminate cancer cells. Initial data suggest that objective anti-tumor response rates may be higher with anti-PD-1 agents compared with ipilimumab and the safety profile may be more tolerable. This review explores the development and next steps for PD-1 pathway inhibitors, including discussion of their novel mechanism of action and clinical data to-date, with a focus on melanoma.

Metastatic volume: an old oncologic concept and a new prognostic factor for stage IV melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

The last melanoma staging system of the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer takes into account, for stage IV disease, the serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the site of distant metastases.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare the significance of metastatic volume, as evaluated at the time of stage IV melanoma diagnosis, with other clinical predictors of prognosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentric study. To establish which variables were statistically correlated both with death and survival time, contingency tables were evaluated. The overall survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Metastatic volume and number of affected organs were statistically related to death. In detail, patients with a metastatic volume >15 cm(3) had a worse prognosis than those with a volume lower than this value (survival probability at 60 months: 6.8 vs. 40.9%, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier method confirmed that survival time was significantly related to the site(s) of metastases, to elevated LDH serum levels and to melanoma stage according to the latest system.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that metastatic volume may be considered as a useful prognostic factor for survival among melanoma patients.

Sex Is an Independent Prognostic Indicator for Survival and Relapse/Progression-Free Survival in Metastasized Stage III to IV Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis of Five European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

To study sex differences in survival and progression in patients with stage III or IV metastatic melanoma and to compare our results with published literature.

Patients and Methods

Data were retrieved from three large, randomized, controlled trials of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer in patients with stage III and two trials in patients with stage IV melanoma. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for females compared with males, adjusted for different sets of confounders for stage III and stage IV, respectively.

Results

In 2,734 stage III patients, females had a superior 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate compared with males (51.5% v 43.3%), an adjusted HR for DSS of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.95), and an adjusted HR for relapse-free survival of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95). In 1,306 stage IV patients, females also exhibited an advantage in DSS (2-year survival rate, 14.1% v 19.0%; adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92) as well as for progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88). This female advantage was consistent across pre- and postmenopausal age categories and across different prognostic subgroups. However, the female advantage seems to become smaller in patients with higher metastatic tumor load.

Conclusion

The persistent independent female advantage, even after metastasis to lymph nodes and distant sites, contradicts theories about sex behavioral differences as an explanation for this phenomenon. A biologic sex trait seems to profoundly influence melanoma progression and survival, even in advanced disease.

Results of systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma in inoperable stage III and IV

AIM OF THE STUDY

The incidence of melanoma is increasing rapidly worldwide. Metastatic melanoma is still an incurable disease, although an era of new drugs is approaching. Current methods to predict outcomes in patients with advanced, metastatic melanoma are limited. A retrospective analysis of a contemporary large group of advanced melanomas was performed to determine clinical prognostic factors that accurately predict survival in patients with metastatic melanoma before the era of new targeted/immunological therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective analysis of 427 patients with metastatic melanoma treated between 1995 and 2005 at two reference oncological centres.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time (OS) was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.7-7.9) and the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 32.3%; 12.5%; 3.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival time (PFS) after the first line of treatment was 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.1-3.8). There were 19.1% objective responses (CR - 6.1%, PR - 13.0%) and SD - 45.5% after the first line of therapy. The most common adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting. IN MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES: PS (performance status) 0-1, normal serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate transaminase (AspAT), older age in women, palliative surgical treatment and palliative radiotherapy, type of the first line of therapy (DTIC), and metastatic melanoma of unknown primary site were independent positive predictors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate of patients with metastatic melanoma has not changed significantly over the last years. We identified a set of independent positive predictors for OS treated with systemic therapy. DTIC still may be useful in treatment of patients in a good general condition and with normal serum levels of LDH. Because the results of treatment of metastatic melanoma are still not satisfactory, the majority of patients should be treated within prospective, randomized clinical trials.

Serum markers lactate dehydrogenase and S100B predict independently disease outcome in melanoma patients with distant metastasis

Background:

Established prognostic factors are of limited value to predict long-term survival and benefit from metastasectomy in advanced melanoma. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with distant metastasis.

Methods:

We analysed overall survival of 855 institutional melanoma patients with distant metastasis by bivariate Kaplan–Meier survival probabilities and multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis.

Results:

Serum lactate dehydrogenases (LDH), S100B, the interval between initial diagnosis and occurrence of distant metastasis, the site of distant metastases, and the number of involved distant sites were significant independent prognostic factors in both bivariate and multivariate analyses. Visceral metastases other than lung (hazard ratio (HR) 1.8), elevated S100B (HR 1.7) and elevated LDH (HR 1.6) had the highest negative impact on survival. Complete metastasectomy was likewise an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. This treatment was associated with favourable survival for patients with normal LDH and S100B values (5-year survival, 37.2%).

Conclusion:

The serum markers LDH and S100B were both found to be prognostic factors in melanoma patients with distant metastasis. Furthermore, complete metastasectomy had an independent favourable prognostic impact in particular for the patient subgroup with normal LDH and S100B values.

Staging and prognosis of cutaneous melanoma

Staging of cutaneous melanoma continues to evolve through identification and rigorous analysis of potential prognostic factors. In 1998, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging Committee developed the AJCC melanoma staging database, an international integrated compilation of prospectively accumulated melanoma outcome data from several centers and clinical trial cooperative groups. Analysis of this database resulted in major revisions to the TNM staging system reflected in the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual published in 2002. More recently, the committee's analysis of an updated melanoma staging database, including prospective data on more than 50,000 patients, led to staging revisions adopted in the seventh edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual published in 2009. This article highlights these revisions, reviews relevant prognostic factors and their impact on staging, and discusses emerging tools that will likely affect future staging systems and clinical practice.

Does metastasectomy improve survival in patients with Stage IV melanoma? A cancer registry analysis of outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Stage IV melanoma have limited therapeutic options with few long-term survivors. Our goal was to study the impact of metastasectomy on survival in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with Stage IV melanoma were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2006). Those who had metastasectomy performed were compared with patients that did not.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population (n = 4,229) was 63 years and median survival was 7 months. Patients who underwent metastasectomy (33.6%) had an improved median and 5-year overall survival as compared to patients who did not; 12 months versus 5 months and 16% versus 7% (P < 0.001). In patients with M1a disease (n = 1,994), this improvement of survival following metastasectomy was enhanced; median survival of 14 months versus 6 months and 5-year overall survival of 20% versus 9% (P < 0.001). Younger age and diagnosis from 2001 to 2006 were predictors of metastasectomy. Metastasectomy was an independent and significant predictor of survival for the entire cohort (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.55-0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasectomy in patients with Stage IV melanoma may improve long-term survival. The true therapeutic benefit, if any, of metastatectomy needs to be determined by a randomized trial.

Hepatic artery chemoembolization in patients with ocular melanoma metastatic to the liver: response, survival, and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Although hepatic arterial chemoembolization (HACE) has been used for treatment of ocular melanoma metastatic to the liver, the prognostic indicators for survival after HACE have not been studied. We evaluated response rates and survival durations after HACE in such patients and analyzed factors affecting their survival.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with ocular melanoma metastatic to liver who underwent HACE at our institution from 1992 to 2005 were reviewed. The radiologic tumor response rates, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival durations were calculated, and patient, tumor, and treatment variables were analyzed to identify factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five patients underwent 265 HACE sessions. Of 105 patients in whom radiologic responses could be evaluated, 12 (11%) had partial responses, 17 (16%) had minor responses, 68 (65%) had stable disease, and 8 (8%) had progressive disease. The median OS and progression-free survival durations were 6.7 and 3.8 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that >75% liver involvement and high lactate dehydrogenase levels were associated with short OS. Patients who had radiologic responses to HACE had a longer median OS duration than did patients who did not (15.8 vs. 6.1 months; P = 0.0005). Patients with >75% liver involvement had a median OS duration of only 2.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

HACE resulted in radiologic response or disease stabilization in most patients with ocular melanomas metastatic to the liver. The extent of liver involvement, baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels, and response to therapy were found to be significant predictors of OS after HACE.

Malignant melanoma

Malignant melanoma is the most lethal cutaneous neoplasm. Awareness, detection, and treatment along with sophistication of both the physician and patient are integral components to early recognition and cure of the disease. Diagnosis of melanoma at its earliest stage is crucial to outcome. This article discusses in depth the clinical presentation and evaluation, patterns of growth, and pathologic staging of the neoplasm and regional lymph nodes. Treatment approaches and outcomes are presented.

Can surgeons improve survival in stage IV melanoma?

Successful systemic management of stage IV melanoma continues to be elusive because of the paucity of effective therapies. This has fueled the continued interest in surgical resection. Several single-institution studies and a current, large, multi-institutional phase III trial have demonstrated a survival benefit for patients who underwent surgical resection for melanoma metastases. Incorporating these results into new approaches using multimodality treatment may enhance survival in patients with stage IV melanoma.

A single-institution validation of the AJCC staging system for stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with stage IV melanoma is poor. In the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, site of distant disease and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are the only prognostic factors included for stage IV disease. We sought to validate the current AJCC staging system in a contemporary, prospectively collected cohort of patients and explore additional factors that may influence prognosis.

METHODS

Our prospective database was searched to identify patients with stage IV melanoma; only patients seen at our institution before developing stage IV disease were included (n = 589). Demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics were abstracted. Univariate and multivariate assessment of prognostic factors associated with survival were performed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

Overall median survival was 9 months. Differential survival by AJCC substage was observed (P < .001). For each site of disease described within the AJCC staging system, an abnormal LDH level was associated with a poorer prognosis. By multivariate analysis, older age at diagnosis (as a continuous variable, hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]) 1.01-1.02), an abnormal LDH (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.11-1.82), site of disease (lung HR 1.22, 95% CI .89-1.66; other viscera 1.61, 95% CI 1.18-2.21), more than one organ involvement (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.60), and more than one metastasis (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.65-3.14) were independently associated with poorer survival. Sex, antecedent stage, and disease-free interval were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In our patient cohort, the AJCC staging system was valid. The strongest predictor of survival-the number of metastases present at the diagnosis of stage IV disease-represents a variable to consider in future staging systems.

Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trials

PURPOSE

Objective tumor response rates observed in phase II trials for metastatic melanoma have historically not provided a reliable indicator of meaningful survival benefits. To facilitate using overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) as an endpoint for future phase II trials, we evaluated historical data from cooperative group phase II trials to attempt to develop benchmarks for OS and PFS as reference points for future phase II trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual-level and trial-level data were obtained for patients enrolled onto 42 phase II trials (70 trial arms) that completed accrual in the years 1975 through 2005 and conducted by Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables, and between-trial(-arm) variability in 1-year OS rates and 6-month PFS rates were examined.

RESULTS

Statistically significant individual-level and trial-level prognostic factors found in a multivariate survival analysis for OS were performance status, presence of visceral disease, sex, and whether the trial excluded patients with brain metastases. Performance status, sex, and age were statistically significant prognostic factors for PFS. Controlling for these prognostic variables essentially eliminated between-trial variability in 1-year OS rates but not in 6-month PFS rates.

CONCLUSION

Benchmarks are provided for 1-year OS or OS curves that make use of the distribution of prognostic factors of the patients in the phase II trial. A similar benchmark for 6-month PFS is provided, but its use is more problematic because of residual between-trial variation in this endpoint.

A phase II study of extended dose temozolomide and thalidomide in previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of extended dose temozolomide and continuous thalidomide in patients with advanced metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included adults with histologic diagnosis of metastatic melanoma with adequate organ function and performance status. Temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)/day) was administered for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Thalidomide (200 mg/day) was given for the first 2 weeks and increased by 100 mg/day at weekly intervals up to a maximum of 400 mg/day, if no toxicity. For patients older than 70 years, thalidomide was started at 100 mg/day and the dose was increased by 50 mg/day up to a maximum of 250 mg/day.

RESULTS

Twenty-six extensively pretreated subjects, with poor prognostic factors, were entered into this study and included in all analyses. According to the RECIST criteria, one (4%) subject achieved a complete response (CR), two (8%) partial response (PR), and five (19%) stable disease (SD), for a response rate (CR + PR) of 12% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0-24.7%] and a clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD) of 31%. Median time to progression was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.2-2.4 months) and median survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.2 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of temozolomide and thalidomide is well tolerated in patients with very advanced heavily pretreated metastatic melanoma. It has modest activity in this population with grave prognosis.

Conduta para o melanoma cutâneo

A incidência do melanoma cutâneo vem aumentando significativamente de 1:1500 em 1935 para cerca de 1:75 no ano 2000. Contudo, atribuído a um diagnóstico cada vez mais precoce, têm-se observado uma melhora da sobrevida em cinco anos com diminuição da taxa de mortalidade geral entre 70 a 80% desde a década de 30. É o câncer mais prevalente na faixa etária entre 25 e 35 anos nos EUA. O Brasil ocupa a 15º posição com relação à incidência do tumor no mundo. O estadiamento inicial é baseado na pesquisa de sinais e sintomas que podem indicar doença metastática. Especial atenção deve ser dada à palpação de linfonodos regionais. A espessura e a ulceração são os principais fatores de risco independentes, em pacientes com melanoma primário com linfonodos livres. Já naqueles com metástases linfonodais, a presença de ulceração, de metástase detectada macroscopicamente e o número de linfonodos acometidos, são os principais índices de impacto na sobrevida. Pacientes com metástases para o pulmão possuem melhor prognóstico no primeiro ano de sobrevida em comparação àqueles com metástases para outros órgãos. A dosagem de DHL é fator prognóstico poderoso, sendo incluída no último estadiamento publicado, em pacientes com estádio IV da doença. A pesquisa do linfonodo sentinela já é técnica incorporada à conduta de pacientes com melanoma com reconhecido impacto no estadiamento, prognóstico e programação terapêutica. Devido à falta de padronização para o tratamento do melanoma, muitos pacientes ainda evoluem com um prognóstico reservado devido a uma conduta inicial inadequada. Os tratamentos vêm mudando significativamente e a proposta deste trabalho visa apresentar uma revisão com ênfase nas condutas preconizadas para o melanoma.

Thin melanomas: predictive lethal characteristics from a 30-year clinical experience

OBJECTIVE

To guide treatment and clinical follow-up by defining the natural history of thin melanomas and identifying negative prognostic characteristics that may delineate high-risk patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

In following > 10,000 patients with cutaneous melanoma over the past 30 years, our institution has observed nodal or metastatic disease in approximately 15% of patients with a thin (<1 mm) primary lesion.

METHODS

A database query of patients with cutaneous melanoma returned 1158 patients with primary lesion < or = 1 mm thick and who received their initial treatment at a single institution. Median follow-up was 11 years (range, 1 to 34 years). Patient and melanoma characteristics as well as outcomes were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

6.6% of patients had nodal or distant disease at presentation. Over time, an additional 9.4% developed metastases, including nodal and distal recurrences. Overall incidence of advanced disease was 15.3%. Univariate analysis identified male gender (P = 0.01), advanced age (>45 years; P = 0.05), and Breslow thickness (>0.75 mm; P = 0.008) as significant negative prognostic characteristics. Of patients with these 3 high-risk characteristics, 19.7% developed advanced disease (likelihood ratio 6.3; P = 0.007 versus nonhigh-risk patients). This group had more than twice the incidence of nodal recurrences. Patients with recurrence had significantly decreased 10-year survival (82% versus 45%; P < 0.0001). Surprisingly, neither ulceration nor Clark level predicted advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Thin melanomas are potentially lethal lesions. Long-term follow-up identified a high-risk population of older males with tumors between 0.75 mm and 1.0 mm whose risk of recurrent disease approaches 20%. Traditionally accepted negative prognostic factors such as ulceration and discordant Clark levels are not predictive for metastasis in this population. Given the poor prognosis associated with recurrent disease, we recommend close clinical evaluation and follow-up to maximize accurate staging and therapeutic options.

Prognostic factors in primary cutaneous melanoma

Tumor thickness has historically been the single most important factor in risk assessment for stage I and II melanoma patients. However, it is possible to more accurately determine a patient's prognosis by also using other known prognostic indicators, such as ulceration, vascular invasion, and angiogenesis. A probabilistic approach to risk assessment has implications for the appropriate selection of treatment modalities, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and re-excision margins. Each patient's risk for recurrence also has implications for which follow-up protocol would be most appropriate for the patient. Finally, those risk factors that repeatedly demonstrate an independent impact on prognosis should be used as stratification factors in adjuvant therapy trials.

Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma with dacarbazine plus tamoxifen, or vindesine plus tamoxifen: a prospective randomized study

This study aimed to verify whether the advantage in terms of response rate and survival of dacarbazine plus tamoxifen over dacarbazine alone in metastatic malignant melanoma reported in a previous randomized trial was due to a specific interaction of dacarbazine with tamoxifen. A total of 125 patients with locoregional or disseminated malignant melanoma were randomized to receive dacarbazine (250 mg/m(2) days 1-5 every 3 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm A) or vindesine (3 mg/m(2) every week for 6 weeks, then every 2 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm B). Of the 125 randomized patients, 57 and 59 were evaluable in arm A and B, respectively. The complete response rates were the same (2% versus 2%) and the complete plus partial response rates were similar (11% versus 14%) in the two groups. There was no significant difference in survival. Neither response or survival correlated with gender. In conclusion, when combined with tamoxifen, dacarbazine does not have a specific effect on response or survival compared with vindesine. The lower response rate to dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (11%) than that reported in the previous trial (28%) might be explained by actual differences in patient and/or participating centre accrual characteristics in the presence of apparently identical eligibility criteria.

The biological actions of estrogens on skin

There is still extensive disparity in our understanding of how estrogens exert their actions, particularly in non-reproductive tissues such as the skin. Although it has been recognized for some time that estrogens have significant effects on many aspects of skin physiology and pathophysiology, studies on estrogen action in skin have been limited. However, estrogens clearly have an important function in many components of human skin including the epidermis, dermis, vasculature, hair follicle and the sebaceous, eccrine and apocrine glands, having significant roles in skin aging, pigmentation, hair growth, sebum production and skin cancer. The recent discovery of a second intracellular estrogen receptor (ERbeta) with different cell-specific roles to the classic estrogen receptor (ERalpha), and the identification of cell surface estrogen receptors, has provided further challenges to understanding the mechanism of estrogen action. It is now time to readdress many of the outstanding questions regarding the role of estrogens in skin and improve our understanding of the physiology and interaction of steroid hormones and their receptors in human skin. Not only will this lead to a better understanding of estrogen action, but may also provide a basis for further interventions in pathological processes that involve dysregulation of estrogen action.

The biological treatment of renal-cell carcinoma and melanoma

Biological therapies are claiming a place in the routine management of some solid tumours. In this review we focus on the biological treatment of melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma, identifying the background to current practice and areas of promise that may be in routine clinical use in the near future. Melanomas and renal-cell carcinomas are particularly resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and are characterised by the host immune response to the tumours. For this reason there has been particular interest in the biological therapy of these diseases. Biological therapies differ from chemotherapeutic approaches in their mechanism of action, time to response, and side-effect profiles. Although biological treatment has a long history, it is only with recent advances in immunology and molecular biology that progress has been made. In the next few years investigators expect to build on their research experience with biotherapeutic agents to provide tangible benefits for patients.