u-PA and c-MET mRNA expression is co-ordinately enhanced while hepatocyte growth factor mRNA is down-regulated in human hepatocellular carcinoma

Expression of IGF-II in early experimental hepatocellular carcinomas and its significance in early diagnosis

AIM: To investigate the serum level and expression of insulin growth factor II (IGF-II) in liver tissues of rats with early experimental hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and its significance in early diagnosis.

METHODS: Early experimental hepatocellular carcinomas were induced by diethylnitrosamine (DENA) in 180 male SD rats. Another 20 male SD rats served as control. The IGF-II serum level was measured by ELISA. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopic immunohistochemistry were used to observe the expression of IGF-II in normal and tumor liver tissues and its ultrastructural location in malignant hepatocytes. The expressions of IGF-II in human hepatoma cell lines HepG2, SMMC7721 and human embryonic liver cell line L-02 were measured by immunocytochemistry. IGF-II mRNA level was studied by in situ hybridization.

RESULTS: IGF-II was expressed in the cytoplasm of both sinusoidal cells in paracancerous cirrhotic liver tissue and malignant hepatocytes in early experimental HCC tissues. Gold particles were seen on the rough endoplasmic reticulum and the mitochondrion in malignant hepatocytes. IGF-II was expressed in the human hepatoma cell lines. The mRNA level of IGF-II was higher in rat liver tumor tissue than in normal rat liver tissue. The serum IGF-II level of the early experimental HCC group was 34.67 ± 10.53 ng·mL^-1 and that of the control group was 11.75 ± 5.84 ng·mL^-1. The rank sum test was used for statistical analysis. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: During the induction of early experimental HCC by DENA, IGF-II may promote hepatocytic proliferation via a paracrine mechanism in the pre-cancerous stage. When hepatocytes are transformed into malignant cells, they may secrete IGF-II and promote malignant cell proliferation by an autocrine mechanism. IGF-II may be a possible biological marker in the early diagnosis of HCC.

The prognostic molecular markers in hepatocellular carcinoma

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains dismal, although many advances in its clinical study have been made. It is important for tumor control to identify the factors that predispose patients to death. With new discoveries in cancer biology, the pathological and biological prognostic factors of HCC have been studied quite extensively. Analyzing molecular markers (biomarkers) with prognostic significance is a complementary method. A large number of molecular factors have been shown to associate with the invasiveness of HCC, and have potential prognostic significance. One important aspect is the analysis of molecular markers for the cellular malignancy phenotype. These include alterations in DNA ploidy, cellular proliferation markers (PCNA, Ki-67, Mcm2, MIB1, MIA, and CSE1L/CAS protein), nuclear morphology, the p53 gene and its related molecule MD M2, other cell cycle regulators (cyclin A, cyclin D, cyclin E, cdc2, p27, p73), oncogenes and their receptors (such as ras, c-myc, c-fms, HGF, c-met, and erb-B receptor family members), apoptosis related factors (Fas and FasL), as well as telomerase activity. Another important aspect is the analysis of molecular markers involved in the process of cancer invasion and metastasis. Adhesion molecules (E-cadherin, catenins, serum intercellular adhesion molecule-1, CD44 variants), proteinases involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix (MMP-2, MMP-9, uPA, uPAR, PAI), as well as other molecules have been regarded as biomarkers for the malignant phenotype of HCC, and are related to prognosis and therapeutic outcomes. Tumor angiogenesis is critical to both the growth and metastasis of cancers including HCC, and has drawn much attention in recent years. Many angiogenesis-related markers, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF), thrombospondin (TSP), angiogenin, pleiotrophin, and endostatin (ES) levels, as well as intratumor microvessel density (MVD) have been evaluated and found to be of prognostic significance. Body fluid (particularly blood and urinary) testing for biomarkers is easily accessible and useful in clinical patients. The prognostic significance of circulating DNA in plasma or serum, and its genetic alterations in HCC are other important trends. More attention should be paid to these two areas in future. As the progress of the human genome project advances, so does a clearer understanding of tumor biology, and more and more new prognostic markers with high sensitivity and specificity will be found and used in clinical assays. However, the combination of some items, i.e., the pathological features and some biomarkers mentioned above, seems to be more practical for now.