1
|
Li SF, Ju HH, Feng CS. Effect of cervical Bishop score on induction of labor at term in primiparas using Foley catheter balloon: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:401. [PMID: 38822253 PMCID: PMC11143649 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06600-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies had found that the mechanical methods were as effective as pharmacological methods in achieving vaginal delivery. However, whether balloon catheter induction is suitable for women with severe cervical immaturity and whether it will increase the related risks still need to be further explored. RESEARCH AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter balloon for labor induction at term in primiparas with different cervical scores. METHODS A total of 688 primiparas who received cervical ripening with a Foley catheter balloon were recruited in this study. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (Bishop score ≤ 3) and Group 2 (3 < Bishop score < 7). Detailed medical data before and after using of balloon were faithfully recorded. RESULTS The cervical Bishop scores of the two groups after catheter placement were all significantly higher than those before (Group 1: 5.49 ± 1.31 VS 2.83 ± 0.39, P<0.05; Group 2: 6.09 ± 1.00 VS 4.45 ± 0.59, P<0.05). The success rate of labor induction in group 2 was higher than that in group 1 (P<0.05). The incidence of intrauterine infection in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 2 (18.3% VS 11.3%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION The success rates of induction of labor by Foley catheter balloon were different in primiparas with different cervical conditions, the failure rate of induction of labor and the incidence of intrauterine infection were higher in primiparas with severe cervical immaturity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Fen Li
- Obstetrical Department, Changzhou Women and Children Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hui-Hui Ju
- Obstetrical Department, Changzhou Women and Children Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chuan-Shou Feng
- Obstetrical Department, Changzhou Women and Children Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nicola-Ducey L, Allshouse AA, Canfield D, Nygaard IE. Pelvic Floor Symptoms 4 Years After Elective Labor Induction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. UROGYNECOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2024:02273501-990000000-00190. [PMID: 38498772 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pelvic floor disorders are common and burdensome. Data on the effect of induction of labor on pelvic floor disorders are sparse and results are mixed. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate whether elective labor induction in nulliparous women increases the risks of symptomatic urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI), or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) 4 years after delivery. STUDY DESIGN In this single-site follow-up study of "A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management" (ARRIVE) that randomized low-risk nulliparous women with a singleton fetus to elective induction of labor versus expectant management, we compared pelvic floor symptoms between groups at a median of 4 years (interquartile range, 3.5-5.3) after first delivery using validated questionnaires. RESULTS Seventy hundred sixty-six of 1,042 (74%) original participants responded, and 647 participants (62%) were included in the analysis after exclusions. The overall prevalence rates of symptomatic moderate to severe UI, AI, and POP were 21%, 14%, and 8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes between women randomized to induction of labor and those to expectant management, either in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. There were also no differences in secondary outcomes, including subtypes of UI or flatal versus stool incontinence. CONCLUSIONS In this single-site study, we found no significant differences in any UI, AI, and POP symptoms between nulliparous women randomized to elective induction of labor and to expectant management; however, for the least frequent outcome (POP), meaningful differences cannot be ruled out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Nicola-Ducey
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | - Dana Canfield
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Ingrid E Nygaard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Strößner L, Heimann Y, Schleußner E, Kolterer A. Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter - Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1500-1507. [PMID: 38046528 PMCID: PMC10689105 DOI: 10.1055/a-2177-0290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure to initiate or augment contractions when labour is delayed or uncertain. The double balloon catheter is a safe and effective mechanical method for cervical ripening during induction of labour. This study evaluates the effectiveness of reducing double balloon catheter insertion time from 12 to 6 hours. Methods 248 women undergoing induction with a double balloon catheter at term were divided into two groups: catheter placed for 12 hours at 8 pm in the first half of 2021 (P12) and catheter placed for 6 hours at 7 am in the second half of 2021 (P6). T-tests, chi-squared tests, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. Primary and secondary endpoints included induction to delivery interval, prostaglandin to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results The P6 group had a significantly reduced induction to delivery interval of 558 min (P6: 1348 min, P12: 1906 min, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 376-710) within demographically comparable groups. Multiparous women also showed a significant reduction in prostaglandin to delivery interval of 260 min (P6: 590 min, P12: 850 min, p = 0.038, 95% CI: 9-299). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery, maternal blood loss, or neonatal outcome. Conclusion Reducing double balloon catheter placement time from 12 to 6 hours resulted in almost 9 hours less induction to delivery interval without adverse effects on maternal and neonatal outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Strößner
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Yvonne Heimann
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Anna Kolterer
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bachar G, Abu-Rass H, Farago N, Justman N, Buchnik G, Chen YS, David CB, Goldfarb N, Khatib N, Ginsberg Y, Zipori Y, Weiner Z, Vitner D. Continuous vs intermittent induction of labor with oxytocin in nulliparous patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:101176. [PMID: 37813304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oxytocin is considered the drug of choice for the induction of labor, although the optimal protocol and infusion duration remain to be determined. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess whether the duration of oxytocin infusion increases 24-hour delivery rates and affects the length of time-to-delivery and patient's experience. STUDY DESIGN A randomized controlled trial was performed at a single tertiary medical center, between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022. Nulliparous patients with a singleton pregnancy at a vertex presentation and a Bishop score ≥6 were randomly assigned to receive either continuous (16 hours, with a 4 hours pause in between infusions) or intermittent (8 hours, with a 4 hours pause in between infusions) oxytocin infusion, until delivery. In both groups, infusion was halted when signs of maternal or fetal compromise were observed. Randomization was conducted with a computer randomization sequence generation program. The primary outcome was delivery within 24 hours from the first oxytocin infusion and the secondary outcome included time-to-delivery, mode of delivery, and additional maternal and neonatal outcomes. Seventy-two patients per group were randomized to reach 80% statistical power with a 20% difference in the primary outcome according to previous studies. RESULTS A total of 153 patients were randomized, 72 to the continuous oxytocin infusion group and 81 to the intermittent infusion group. The total oxytocin infusion time was similar between the groups. Patients in the continuous arm were more likely to deliver within 24 hours from oxytocin initiation (79.73% vs 62.96%, P<.05), and had a shorter oxytocin-to-delivery time interval, compared with patients receiving intermittent treatment (9.3±3.7 hours vs 21±11.7 hours, P<.001). Furthermore, time from ruptured membranes to delivery was shorter (9.3±3.7 hours vs 21±11.7 hours; P<.0001) and chorioamnionitis was less frequent (9.46% vs 21%; P<.05) in the continuous compared with the intermittent arm. Cesarean delivery rate was 20% in both groups (P=.226). There was no difference in postpartum hemorrhage, or adverse neonatal outcomes between the groups. Patients receiving continuous oxytocin infusion were more satisfied with the birthing experience. CONCLUSION Continuous infusion of oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous patients with a favorable cervix may be superior to intermittent oxytocin infusion, because it shortens time-to-delivery, decreases chorioamnionitis rate, and improves maternal satisfaction, without affecting adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gal Bachar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana).
| | - Hiba Abu-Rass
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Naama Farago
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Naphtali Justman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Gili Buchnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Yoav Siegler Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Chen Ben David
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Nirit Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Nizar Khatib
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana); Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Yuval Ginsberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana); Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Yaniv Zipori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana); Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Zeev Weiner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana); Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| | - Dana Vitner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel (Drs Gal, Hiba, Naama, Naphtali, Gili, Yoav, Chen, Mr Nirit, Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana); Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Drs Nizar, Yuval, Yaniv, Zeev, and Dana)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 3:CD001233. [PMID: 36996264 PMCID: PMC10061553 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical methods were the first methods developed to ripen the cervix and induce labour. During recent decades they have been substituted by pharmacological methods. Potential advantages of mechanical methods, compared with pharmacological methods may include reduction in side effects that could improve neonatal outcomes. This is an update of a review first published in 2001, last updated in 2012. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness and safety of mechanical methods for third trimester (> 24 weeks' gestation) induction of labour in comparison with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (vaginal and intracervical), low-dose misoprostol (oral and vaginal), amniotomy or oxytocin. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and reference lists of retrieved studies (9 January 2018). We updated the search in March 2019 and added the search results to the awaiting classification section of the review. SELECTION CRITERIA Clinical trials comparing mechanical methods used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with pharmacological methods. Mechanical methods include: (1) the introduction of a catheter through the cervix into the extra-amniotic space with balloon insufflation; (2) introduction of laminaria tents, or their synthetic equivalent (Dilapan), into the cervical canal; (3) use of a catheter to inject fluid into the extra-amniotic space (EASI). This review includes the following comparisons: (1) specific mechanical methods (balloon catheter, laminaria tents or EASI) compared with prostaglandins (different types, different routes) or with oxytocin; (2) single balloon compared to a double balloon; (3) addition of prostaglandins or oxytocin to mechanical methods compared with prostaglandins or oxytocin alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed risk of bias. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This review includes a total of 112 trials, with 104 studies contributing data (22,055 women; 21 comparisons). Risk of bias of trials varied. Overall, the evidence was graded from very-low to moderate quality. All evidence was downgraded for lack of blinding and, for many comparisons, the effect estimates were too imprecise to make a valid judgement. Balloon versus vaginal PGE2: there may be little or no difference in vaginal deliveries not achieved within 24 hours (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.26; 7 studies; 1685 women; low-quality evidence) and there probably is little or no difference in caesarean sections (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09; 28 studies; 6619 women; moderate-quality evidence) between induction of labour with a balloon catheter and vaginal PGE2. A balloon catheter probably reduces the risk of uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; 6 studies; 1966 women; moderate-quality evidence), serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.93; 8 studies; 2757 women; moderate-quality evidence) and may slightly reduce the risk of aneonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04; 3647 women; 12 studies; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in serious maternal morbidity or death (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.12; 4 studies; 1481 women) or five-minute Apgar score < 7 (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.14; 4271 women; 14 studies) because the quality of the evidence was found to be very low and low, respectively. Balloon versus low-dose vaginal misoprostol: it is uncertain whether there is a difference in vaginal deliveries not achieved within 24 hours between induction of labour with a balloon catheter and vaginal misoprostol (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.39; 340 women; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). A balloon catheter probably reduces the risk of uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.85; 1322 women; 8 studies; moderate-quality evidence) but may increase the risk of a caesarean section (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.60; 1756 women; 12 studies; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.66; 381 women; 3 studies), serious maternal morbidity or death (no events; 4 studies, 464 women), both very low-quality evidence, and five-minute Apgar score < 7 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.97; 941 women; 7 studies) and NICU admissions (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.63; 1302 women; 9 studies) both low-quality evidence. Balloon versus low-dose oral misoprostol: a balloon catheter probably increases the risk of a vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.46; 782 women, 2 studies, and probably slightly increases the risk of a caesarean section (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32; 3178 women; 7 studies; both moderate-quality evidence) when compared to oral misoprostol. It is uncertain whether there is a difference in uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.38; 2033 women; 2 studies), serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.06; 2627 women; 3 studies), both low-quality evidence, serious maternal morbidity or death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.52; 2627 women; 3 studies), very low-quality evidence, five-minute Apgar scores < 7 (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.32; 2693 women; 4 studies) and NICU admissions (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17; 2873 women; 5 studies) both low-quality evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low- to moderate-quality evidence shows mechanical induction with a balloon is probably as effective as induction of labour with vaginal PGE2. However, a balloon seems to have a more favourable safety profile. More research on this comparison does not seem warranted. Moderate-quality evidence shows a balloon catheter may be slightly less effective as oral misoprostol, but it remains unclear if there is a difference in safety outcomes for the neonate. When compared to low-dose vaginal misoprostol, low-quality evidence shows a balloon may be less effective, but probably has a better safety profile. Future research could be focused more on safety aspects for the neonate and maternal satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Dt de Vaan
- Department of Obstetrics, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
- Department of Health Care Studies, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | | | - Kirsten R Palmer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health and Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp
- Department of Obstetrics, Division Women and Baby, Birth Centre Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ben Willem J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Michel Boulvain
- Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- UZ Brussel, VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evaluation of the effect of dinoprostone vaginal ovule for cervical maturation and labor induction in term pregnancies on the duration of the third stage of labor and amount of postpartum bleeding. JOURNAL OF SURGERY AND MEDICINE 2023. [DOI: 10.28982/josam.7738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aim: Postpartum bleeding is a leading preventable cause of maternal death. Prolonged 3rd stage duration of labor and induction agents can increase postpartum bleeding. This study evaluated the effect of using a dinoprostone (PGE2) vaginal insert, a cervical ripening and labor induction agent, on the 3rd stage duration of labor and the amount of postpartum bleeding.
Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study involved 301 patients with vaginal delivery between 01.10.2020 and 30.06.2021. Patients were separated into two groups: PGE2+oxytocin (Group A) and only oxytocin (Group B). They were compared in terms of prepartum and postpartum data, 3rd stage duration of labor, and the amount of blood loss in the first 18 h postpartum.
Results: The median 3rd stage duration of labor was 8 min in Group A and 7 min in Group B (P=0.009). No significant differences were found between the groups in the amount of postpartum blood loss, percentage changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit values, or when patients were analyzed based on 3rd stage duration of labor (≤10 vs. >10 min). Severe postpartum hemorrhage (≥1000 ml) was associated with decreased gravida, increased body mass index, longer oxytocin use, and prolonged 3rd stage duration of labor in all patients. In Group A, severe postpartum hemorrhage was associated with decreased gravida, increased body mass index, and longer duration of PGE2 use.
Conclusion: PGE2 prolonged the 3rd stage duration of labor, but this did not increase postpartum bleeding compared to oxytocin. However, an increase in the duration of PGE2 use was associated with postpartum hemorrhage. Therefore, shortening the duration may be considered in patients with additional risk for postpartum hemorrhage.
Collapse
|
7
|
Don EE, Landman AJEMC, Vissers G, Jordanova ES, Post Uiterweer ED, de Groot CJM, de Boer MA, Huirne JAF. Uterine Fibroids Causing Preterm Birth: A New Pathophysiological Hypothesis on the Role of Fibroid Necrosis and Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23158064. [PMID: 35897637 PMCID: PMC9331897 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
According to recent studies and observations in clinical practice, uterine fibroids increase the risk of preterm birth. There are several theories on the pathogenesis of preterm birth in the presence of fibroids. One theory proclaims that fibroid necrosis leads to preterm birth, though pathophysiological mechanisms have not been described. Necrotic tissue secretes specific cytokines and proteins and we suggest these to be comparable to the inflammatory response leading to spontaneous preterm birth. We hypothesize that fibroid necrosis could induce preterm parturition through a similar inflammatory response. This new hypothesis generates novel perspectives for future research and the development of preventative strategies for preterm birth. Moreover, we emphasize the importance of the recognition of fibroids and especially fibroid necrosis by clinicians during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E. Don
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.E.M.C.L.); (G.V.); (C.J.M.d.G.); (M.A.d.B.); (J.A.F.H.)
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-4444
| | - Anadeijda J. E. M. C. Landman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.E.M.C.L.); (G.V.); (C.J.M.d.G.); (M.A.d.B.); (J.A.F.H.)
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guus Vissers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.E.M.C.L.); (G.V.); (C.J.M.d.G.); (M.A.d.B.); (J.A.F.H.)
| | - Ekaterina S. Jordanova
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel D. Post Uiterweer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne J. M. de Groot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.E.M.C.L.); (G.V.); (C.J.M.d.G.); (M.A.d.B.); (J.A.F.H.)
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon A. de Boer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.E.M.C.L.); (G.V.); (C.J.M.d.G.); (M.A.d.B.); (J.A.F.H.)
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith A. F. Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.J.E.M.C.L.); (G.V.); (C.J.M.d.G.); (M.A.d.B.); (J.A.F.H.)
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guiguet-Auclair C, Rouzaire M, Debost-Legrand A, Dissard S, Rouille M, Delabaere A, Gallot D. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the EXIT to Measure Women’s Experiences of Induction of Labor. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11144217. [PMID: 35887980 PMCID: PMC9317795 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In France, more than 20% of women require induction of labor (IOL), which can be psychologically and emotionally challenging for patients. It is important to assess how they feel about their IOL experiences. Our aim was to cross-culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of a French version of the EXIT to assess women’s experiences of IOL. Methods: The EXIT was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations following international guidelines. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the ten French EXIT items: data completeness, factor analysis, internal consistency, score distribution, floor and ceiling effects, inter-subscale correlations, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability. Results: The EXIT was successfully cross-culturally adapted to the French context and any IOL method. The results obtained from 163 patients requiring IOL showed good acceptability. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution with subscales reflecting the experiential aspects of time taken to give birth, discomfort with IOL, and subsequent contractions. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha or Spearman correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.84) and good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.85) for the three identified subscales were found. Conclusions: The ten-item French EXIT is a valid and reliable instrument for the self-assessment of women’s experiences of IOL in the three weeks following delivery for any method of IOL used. As a patient-reported outcome measure, it would allow the comparison of experiential outcomes across IOL studies in order to include women’s preferences in decisions regarding their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candy Guiguet-Auclair
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (A.D.-L.); (A.D.)
- Department of Public Health, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Marion Rouzaire
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (M.R.); (S.D.); (M.R.); (D.G.)
| | - Anne Debost-Legrand
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (A.D.-L.); (A.D.)
- Réseau de Santé Périnatale d’Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sigrid Dissard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (M.R.); (S.D.); (M.R.); (D.G.)
| | - Manon Rouille
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (M.R.); (S.D.); (M.R.); (D.G.)
| | - Amélie Delabaere
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (A.D.-L.); (A.D.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (M.R.); (S.D.); (M.R.); (D.G.)
| | - Denis Gallot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; (M.R.); (S.D.); (M.R.); (D.G.)
- Translational Approach to Epithelial Injury and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Université Clermont-Auvergne, CNRS 6293, INSERM 1103, GReD, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Duvillier C, Gams J, Rousseau A, Rozenberg P. [Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: A before-after study]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2022; 50:475-480. [PMID: 35151915 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The rate of induction of labor represented 22 % of deliveries in 2016 in France. Oral misoprostol (Angusta®) was marketed in France in the last quarter of 2018. The objective of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction of labor with oral misoprostol compared to vaginal misoprostol in women with an unripe cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS We carried out a retrospective study before and after the implementation of oral misoprostol including all women with an unripe cervix who benefited from an induction of labor with a viable infant in vertex presentation, without uterine scar. During the first two-year period, women received 50μg of misoprostol in the posterior fornix, repeated 6hours later if needed. If labor had not started after 24hours, women received another dose of 50μg, which was repeated every 4hours until labor was established, up to a total dose of 150μg. During the second two-year period, women received two tablets of oral misoprostol 25μg every four hours if necessary, up to a total dose of 200μg. The primary endpoints were mode of delivery and neonatal safety. RESULTS During the two study periods, 1199 women received vaginal misoprostol and 1199 women received oral misoprostol including. The cesarean delivery rate was 21.8% during the first period and 21,3% during the second period (P=0.83). A 5-minutes Apgar score<7 was observed in 23 (1.9%) and 14 (1.2%) newborns in the vaginal misoprostol and oral misoprostol groups (P=0.14), respectively. An arterial cord pH<7.00 was observed in 6 (0.5%) and 7 (0.6%) newborns (P=0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION Oral misoprostol administered at the dose of 50μg every 4hours (up to a total dose of 200μg) is as effective and safe as the vaginal misoprostol to induce labor in women with an unripe cervix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Duvillier
- Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, équipe U1018, épidémiologie clinique, CESP, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Centre Hospitalier Poissy/Saint-germain, service d'obstétrique et gynécologie, 10, rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France.
| | - J Gams
- Centre Hospitalier Poissy/Saint-germain, service d'obstétrique et gynécologie, 10, rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France
| | - A Rousseau
- Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, équipe U1018, épidémiologie clinique, CESP, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - P Rozenberg
- Université Paris Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, équipe U1018, épidémiologie clinique, CESP, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Centre Hospitalier Poissy/Saint-germain, service d'obstétrique et gynécologie, 10, rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300 Poissy, France; Réseau maternité en Yvelines et périnatalité Active (MYPA), 20, rue Armagis, Pavillon Courtois, 78100 Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kunimi Y, Minami M, Muchanga SMJ, Eitoku M, Hayashi K, Fujieda M, Suganuma N, Maeda N. Exogenous oxytocin used to induce labor has no long-term adverse effect on maternal-infant bonding: Findings from the Japan Environment and Children's Study. J Affect Disord 2022; 299:37-44. [PMID: 34838605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the association between exogenous oxytocin use for labor induction and adverse maternal-infant bonding (MIB). METHODS Data on 19 700 mother-infant pairs were collected, in which the infants were live-birth singletons, born in cephalic position and at >37 weeks of gestation; the drug used to induce labor was noted. Between 2011 and 2014, Japanese pregnant women were enrolled in a nationwide prospective birth cohort study, the Japan Environment and Children's Study. The Japanese version of the Mother-to-infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) was administered and demographic information was collected through medical record transcripts. MIBS-J scores were obtained at one month, six months, and one year after delivery. We estimated the risk of adverse MIB between use of oxytocin and other methods for labor induction using multiple linear regression analyses; interaction and mediation analyses to assess the relationship among MIBS-J scores also followed. RESULTS Exogenous oxytocin was used during labor on 15 252 (77.4%) participants. After adjusting for confounders, there were no significant differences in adverse MIB between groups for which exogenous oxytocin was used and not used for labor induction. LIMITATION The MIBS-J scores at one and six months were compiled using five instead of 10 questions. Moreover, detailed information was unavailable; for example, the questionnaire did not ask for the dosage and timing of the drugs used to induce labor. CONCLUSIONS Exogenous oxytocin is a safe and vital drug to induce labor, and has been shown in this study to have no significant impact on long-term adverse MIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kunimi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan; Kunimi Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Kochi, Kochi 7800870, Japan
| | - Marina Minami
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan
| | - Sifa Marie Joelle Muchanga
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan; Department of International Trials, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Toyama 1628855, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masamitsu Eitoku
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan.
| | - Kazutoshi Hayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Kochi 7818555, Japan
| | - Mikiya Fujieda
- Department of Pediatrics, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi, 7838505, Japan
| | - Narufumi Suganuma
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan
| | - Nagamasa Maeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 7838505, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baranowska B, Kajdy A, Kiersnowska I, Sys D, Tataj-Puzyna U, Daly D, Rabijewski M, Bączek G, Węgrzynowska M. Oxytocin administration for induction and augmentation of labour in polish maternity units - an observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:764. [PMID: 34763657 PMCID: PMC8582102 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04190-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is not enough data regarding practices and protocols on the dose of oxytocin administrated to women during labour. Empirical evidence indicates that compliance with the guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and reduces adverse effects. The study aimed to evaluate practices of oxytocin provision for labour induction and augmentation in two maternity units in Poland. METHODS The article presents a prospective observational study. Data from 545 (n = 545) labours was collected in two maternity units. First, the total dose (the total amount of oxytocin provided from the beginning in the labour ward until delivery including the III and IV stage of labour) and cumulative dose of oxytocin (the amount of oxytocin given until the birth of the neonate) administered to women during labour was calculated. Then, the relationship between the cumulative dose of oxytocin and short term perinatal outcomes (mode of delivery, use of epidural anaesthesia, Apgar scores, birth weight and postpartum blood loss) was analysed. Finally, the compliance of oxytocin supply during labour with national guidelines in the following five criteria: medium, start dose, escalation rate, interval, the continuation of infusion after established labour was examined. RESULTS The average cumulative dose of oxytocin administrated to women before birth was 4402 mU following labour induction and 2366 mU following labour augmentation. The actual administration of oxytocin deviated both from the unit and national guidelines in 93.6% of all observed labours (mainly because of continuation of infusion after established labour). We found no statistically significant correlation between the cumulative dose of oxytocin administered and mode of delivery, immediate postpartum blood loss or Apgar scores. There was no observed effect of cumulative dose oxytocin on short-term perinatal outcomes. The two units participating in the study had similar protocols and did not differ significantly in terms of total oxytocin dose, rates of induction and augmentation - the only observed difference was the mode of delivery. CONCLUSIONS The study showed no effect of the mean cumulative oxytocin dose on short-term perinatal outcomes and high rate of non-compliance of the practice of oxytocin administration for labour induction and augmentation with the national recommendations. Cooperation between different professional groups of maternity care providers should be considered in building national guidelines for maternity care.. Further studies investigating possible long-term effects of the meant cumulative dose of oxytocin and the reasons for non-compliance of practice with guidelines should be carried out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Baranowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Kajdy
- Department of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 90 Żelazna St., 01-004, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Iwona Kiersnowska
- Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dorota Sys
- Department of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 90 Żelazna St., 01-004, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Urszula Tataj-Puzyna
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Déirdre Daly
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michał Rabijewski
- Department of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 90 Żelazna St., 01-004, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grażyna Bączek
- Department of Gynecologic and Obstetrical Didactics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Węgrzynowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blanc-Petitjean P, Dupont C, Carbonne B, Salomé M, Goffinet F, Ray CL. Methods of induction of labor and women's experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:621. [PMID: 34521377 PMCID: PMC8442398 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04076-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Negative childbirth experience may affect mother wellbeing and health. However, it is rarely evaluated in studies comparing methods of induction of labor (IoL). AIM To compare women's experience of IoL according to the method, considering the mediating role of interventions and complications of delivery. METHODS We used data from the MEDIP prospective population-based cohort, including all women with IoL during one month in seven French perinatal networks. The experience of IoL, assessed at 2 months postpartum, was first compared between cervical ripening and oxytocin, and secondarily between different cervical ripening methods. Mediation analyses were used to measure the direct and indirect effects of cervical ripening on maternal experience, through delivery with interventions or complications. FINDINGS The response rate was 47.8% (n = 1453/3042). Compared with oxytocin (n = 541), cervical ripening (n = 910) was associated less often with feelings that labor went 'as expected' (adjusted risk ratio for the direct effect 0.78, 95%CI [0.70-0.88]), length of labor was 'acceptable' (0.76[0.71-0.82]), 'vaginal discomfort' was absent (0.77[0.69-0.85]) and with lower global satisfaction (0.90[0.84-0.96]). Interventions and complications mediated between 6 and 35% of the total effect of cervical ripening on maternal experience. Compared to the dinoprostone insert, maternal experience was not significantly different with the other prostaglandins. The balloon catheter was associated with less pain. DISCUSSION Cervical ripening was associated with a less positive experience of childbirth, whatever the method, only partly explained by interventions and complications of delivery. CONCLUSION Counselling and support of women requiring cervical ripening might be enhanced to improve the experience of IoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Blanc-Petitjean
- Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AP-HP, Louis Mourier Hospital, DHU Risks in pregnancy, Université de Paris, F-92700, Colombes, France.
| | - Corinne Dupont
- Réseau périnatal Aurore - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Université Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425 Health Services and Performance Research, F-69008, Lyon, France
| | - Bruno Carbonne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France
| | - Marina Salomé
- AP-HP, URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker/Cochin, F-75014, Paris, France
| | - François Goffinet
- Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Port Royal Maternity Unit, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Université de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France
| | - Camille Le Ray
- Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, F-75004, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Port Royal Maternity Unit, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Université de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chow R, Li A, Wu N, Martin M, Wessels JM, Foster WG. Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304:1417-1426. [PMID: 34495378 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06228-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Induction of labour has become more common over the last decade, together with an increase in the number of systematic reviews of the subject. However, with multiple systematic reviews it is necessary to evaluate the methodological rigor to ensure the reliability of conclusions and recommendations for clinical practice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to appraise the quality of systematic reviews that examined the efficacy and/or safety of labour induction methods. METHODS An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to 2020 was conducted. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) by two independent reviewers, in duplicate. RESULTS The search identified 387 publications, of which 48 studies (13%) met the a priori inclusion criteria. No significant relationships were found between study quality and number of citations, journal impact factor, or publication year. CONCLUSION Methodological quality for systematic reviews on the induction of labour were ranked as moderate with no significant changes in quality over the past 2 decades. Publication characteristics are not significantly associated with methodological quality, indicating that healthcare professionals should critically appraise studies before applying them to practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Chow
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Allen Li
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Nicole Wu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Morgan Martin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Jocelyn M Wessels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Warren G Foster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Edwards RK, Norris ML, West MD, Zornes C, Loeffler KA, Peck JD. Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38:e57-e63. [PMID: 32120419 PMCID: PMC8049622 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1705113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of study is to compare, in a pilot study, combined dinoprostone vaginal insert and Foley catheter (DVI + Foley) with Foley alone (Foley) for cervical ripening and labor induction at term. STUDY DESIGN In this open-label pilot randomized controlled trial, women not in labor, with intact membranes, no prior uterine incision, an unfavorable cervix, gestational age ≥37 weeks, and a live, nonanomalous singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were randomly assigned, stratified by parity, to DVI + Foley or Foley. Oxytocin was used in both groups after cervical ripening. Primary outcome was time to vaginal delivery. RESULTS From April 2017 to January 2018, 100 women were randomized. Median (25-75th percentile) time to vaginal delivery for nulliparous women was 21.2 (16.6-38.0) hours with DVI + Foley (n = 26) compared with 31.3 (23.3-46.9) hours with Foley (n = 24) (Wilcoxon p = 0.05). Median time to vaginal delivery for parous women was 17.1 (13.6-21.9) hours with DVI + Foley (n = 25) compared with 14.8 (12.7-19.5) hours with Foley (n = 25) (Wilcoxon p = 0.21). Results were also analyzed to consider the competing risk of cesarean using cumulative incidence functions. CONCLUSION Compared with Foley alone, combined use of the dinoprostone vaginal insert and Foley for cervical ripening may shorten time to vaginal delivery for nulliparous but not parous women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney K Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Michelle L Norris
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Mitchell D West
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Christina Zornes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Katherine A Loeffler
- School of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Jennifer D Peck
- School of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carlson N, Ellis J, Page K, Dunn Amore A, Phillippi J. Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction. J Midwifery Womens Health 2021; 66:459-469. [PMID: 33984171 PMCID: PMC8363560 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Induction of labor is increasingly a common component of the intrapartum care. Knowledge of the current evidence on methods of labor induction is an essential component of shared decision-making to determine which induction method meets an individual's health needs and personal preferences. This article provides a review of the current research evidence on labor induction methods, including cervical ripening techniques, and contraction stimulation techniques. Current evidence about expected duration of labor following induction, use of the Bishop score to guide induction, and guidance on the use of combination methods for labor induction are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Carlson
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jessica Ellis
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Katie Page
- Centra Medical Group Women's Center, Forest, Virginia
| | - Alexis Dunn Amore
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Julia Phillippi
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas DM, Weeks AD. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 6:CD014484. [PMID: 34155622 PMCID: PMC8218159 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Misoprostol given orally is a commonly used labour induction method. Our Cochrane Review is restricted to studies with low-dose misoprostol (initially ≤ 50 µg), as higher doses pose unacceptably high risks of uterine hyperstimulation. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose oral misoprostol for labour induction in women with a viable fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (14 February 2021) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing low-dose oral misoprostol (initial dose ≤ 50 µg) versus placebo, vaginal dinoprostone, vaginal misoprostol, oxytocin, or mechanical methods; or comparing oral misoprostol protocols (one- to two-hourly versus four- to six-hourly; 20 µg to 25 µg versus 50 µg; or 20 µg hourly titrated versus 25 µg two-hourly static). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Using Covidence, two review authors independently screened reports, extracted trial data, and performed quality assessments. Our primary outcomes were vaginal birth within 24 hours, caesarean section, and hyperstimulation with foetal heart changes. MAIN RESULTS We included 61 trials involving 20,026 women. GRADE assessments ranged from moderate- to very low-certainty evidence, with downgrading decisions based on imprecision, inconsistency, and study limitations. Oral misoprostol versus placebo/no treatment (four trials; 594 women) Oral misoprostol may make little to no difference in the rate of caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.11; 4 trials; 594 women; moderate-certainty evidence), while its effect on uterine hyperstimulation with foetal heart rate changes is uncertain (RR 5.15, 95% CI 0.25 to 105.31; 3 trials; 495 women; very low-certainty evidence). Vaginal births within 24 hours was not reported. In all trials, oxytocin could be commenced after 12 to 24 hours and all women had pre-labour ruptured membranes. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone (13 trials; 9676 women) Oral misoprostol probably results in fewer caesarean sections (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90; 13 trials, 9676 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis indicated that 10 µg to 25 µg (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.87; 9 trials; 8652 women) may differ from 50 µg (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.34; 4 trials; 1024 women) for caesarean section. Oral misoprostol may decrease vaginal births within 24 hours (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.00; 10 trials; 8983 women; low-certainty evidence) and hyperstimulation with foetal heart rate changes (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59; 11 trials; 9084 women; low-certainty evidence). Oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol (33 trials; 6110 women) Oral use may result in fewer vaginal births within 24 hours (average RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95; 16 trials, 3451 women; low-certainty evidence), and less hyperstimulation with foetal heart rate changes (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.92, 25 trials, 4857 women, low-certainty evidence), with subgroup analysis suggesting that 10 µg to 25 µg orally (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.57; 6 trials, 957 women) may be superior to 50 µg orally (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.11; 19 trials; 3900 women). Oral misoprostol probably does not increase caesarean sections overall (average RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.16; 32 trials; 5914 women; low-certainty evidence) but likely results in fewer caesareans for foetal distress (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.99; 24 trials, 4775 women). Oral misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin (6 trials; 737 women, 200 with ruptured membranes) Misoprostol may make little or no difference to vaginal births within 24 hours (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.33; 3 trials; 466 women; low-certainty evidence), but probably results in fewer caesarean sections (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.90; 6 trials; 737 women; moderate-certainty evidence). The effect on hyperstimulation with foetal heart rate changes is uncertain (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.19 to 2.26; 3 trials, 331 women; very low-certainty evidence). Oral misoprostol versus mechanical methods (6 trials; 2993 women) Six trials compared oral misoprostol to transcervical Foley catheter. Misoprostol may increase vaginal birth within 24 hours (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.79; 4 trials; 1044 women; low-certainty evidence), and probably reduces the risk of caesarean section (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.95; 6 trials; 2993 women; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in hyperstimulation with foetal heart rate changes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.21; 4 trials; 2828 women; low-certainty evidence). Oral misoprostol one- to two-hourly versus four- to six-hourly (1 trial; 64 women) The evidence on hourly titration was very uncertain due to the low numbers reported. Oral misoprostol 20 µg hourly titrated versus 25 µg two-hourly static (2 trials; 296 women) The difference in regimen may have little or no effect on the rate of vaginal births in 24 hours (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.16; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is of very low certainty for all other reported outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low-dose oral misoprostol is probably associated with fewer caesarean sections (and therefore more vaginal births) than vaginal dinoprostone, and lower rates of hyperstimulation with foetal heart rate changes. However, time to birth may be increased, as seen by a reduced number of vaginal births within 24 hours. Compared to transcervical Foley catheter, low-dose oral misoprostol is associated with fewer caesarean sections, but equivalent rates of hyperstimulation. Low-dose misoprostol given orally rather than vaginally is probably associated with similar rates of vaginal birth, although rates may be lower within the first 24 hours. However, there is likely less hyperstimulation with foetal heart changes, and fewer caesarean sections performed due to foetal distress. The best available evidence suggests that low-dose oral misoprostol probably has many benefits over other methods for labour induction. This review supports the use of low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour, and demonstrates the lower risks of hyperstimulation than when misoprostol is given vaginally. More trials are needed to establish the optimum oral misoprostol regimen, but these findings suggest that a starting dose of 25 µg may offer a good balance of efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robbie S Kerr
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nimisha Kumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Myfanwy J Williams
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Cuthbert
- Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nasreen Aflaifel
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - David M Haas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Andrew D Weeks
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The Successful Use of Nitroglycerin for Uterine Hyperstimulation with Fetal Heart Rate Abnormality Caused by a Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Delivery System (PROPESS): A Case Report. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57050478. [PMID: 34065827 PMCID: PMC8151635 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57050478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The PROPESS, a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system, is a pharmacological cervical ripening intervention and promotes cervical change causing uterine contraction. During insertion of the PROPESS, uterine hyperstimulation could occur and result in fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormality. We report a case of uterine hyperstimulation accompanied with FHR abnormality caused by the PROPESS in a pregnant woman. Postural change, oxygenation, fluid infusion, and the immediate PROPESS removal were ineffective to address the adverse event, so we administered nitroglycerin for acute uterine relaxation. The nitroglycerin resulted in uterine relaxation, and the FHR abnormality was resolved immediately, thereby preventing an emergency cesarean section. Therefore, nitroglycerin could be considered an effective option for uterine hyperstimulation accompanied with FHR abnormality caused by the PROPESS.
Collapse
|
18
|
Diguisto C, Le Gouge A, Arthuis C, Winer N, Parant O, Poncelet C, Chauleur C, Hannigsberg J, Ducarme G, Gallot D, Gabriel R, Desbriere R, Beucher G, Faraguet C, Isly H, Rozenberg P, Giraudeau B, Perrotin F. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003448. [PMID: 33571294 PMCID: PMC7877637 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged pregnancies are a frequent indication for induction of labour. When the cervix is unfavourable, cervical ripening before oxytocin administration is recommended to increase the likelihood of vaginal delivery, but no particular method is currently recommended for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies. This trial evaluates whether the use of mechanical cervical ripening with a silicone double balloon catheter for induction of labour in prolonged pregnancies reduces the cesarean section rate for nonreassuring fetal status compared with pharmacological cervical ripening by a vaginal pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). METHODS AND FINDINGS This is a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted in 15 French maternity units. Women with singleton pregnancies, a vertex presentation, ≥41+0 and ≤42+0 weeks' gestation, a Bishop score <6, intact membranes, and no history of cesarean delivery for whom induction of labour was decided were randomised to either mechanical cervical ripening with a Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon or pharmacological cervical ripening by a Propess vaginal pessary serving as a prostaglandin E2 slow-release system. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean for nonreassuring fetal status, with an independent endpoint adjudication committee determining whether the fetal heart rate was nonreassuring. Secondary outcomes included delivery (time from cervical ripening to delivery, number of patients requiring analgesics), maternal and neonatal outcomes. Between January 2017 and December 2018, 1,220 women were randomised in a 1:1 ratio, 610 allocated to a silicone double balloon catheter, and 610 to the Propess vaginal pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone. The mean age of women was 31 years old, and 80% of them were of white ethnicity. The cesarean rates for nonreassuring fetal status were 5.8% (35/607) in the mechanical ripening group and 5.3% (32/609) in the pharmacological ripening group (proportion difference: 0.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.1% to 3.1%, p = 0.70). Time from cervical ripening to delivery was shorter in the pharmacological ripening group (23 hours versus 32 hours, median difference 6.5 95% CI 5.0 to 7.9, p < 0.001), and fewer women required analgesics in the mechanical ripening group (27.5% versus 35.4%, difference in proportion -7.9%, 95% CI -13.2% to -2.7%, p = 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for other delivery, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. A limitation was a low observed rate of cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed no difference in the rates of cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status between mechanical ripening with a silicone double balloon catheter and pharmacological cervical ripening with a pessary for the slow release of dinoprostone. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02907060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Diguisto
- Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine fœtale, médecine et biologie de la reproduction, centre Olympe de Gouges, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
- Université de Tours, France
- Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Chloé Arthuis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Nantes, NUN, INRAE, UMR 1280, PhAN, Université de Nantes, France
| | - Norbert Winer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Nantes, NUN, INRAE, UMR 1280, PhAN, Université de Nantes, France
| | - Olivier Parant
- Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, hôpital Paule-de-Viguier, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Poncelet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rene DUBOS Hospital, Cergy-Pontoise, France
- Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UFR SMBH, Bobigny, France
| | - Celine Chauleur
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
- INSERM, SAINBIOSE, U1059, Dysfonction Vasculaire et Hémostase, Université Jean-Monnet; CIC1408, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Jacob Hannigsberg
- CHU Brest, Hôpital Morvan, service de gynécologie-obstétrique, Brest, France
| | - Guillaume Ducarme
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Departemental, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | - Denis Gallot
- Pôle femme et enfant, CHU Estaing, 1, place Lucie-et-Raymond-Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Team Translational approach to epithelial injury and repair, UMR6293 CNRS-Université Clermont Auvergne, U1103 Inserm, GReD, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rene Gabriel
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Maison Blanche, Reims Cedex, Université de Reims Champagne Ardennes, France
| | - Raoul Desbriere
- Hôpital Saint Joseph, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille, France
| | - Gael Beucher
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Cyrille Faraguet
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier de Chartre, France
| | - Helene Isly
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, France
| | - Patrick Rozenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy, France
- Versailles St-Quentin University, research unit EA 7285. Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Bruno Giraudeau
- Université de Tours, France
- INSERM CIC1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Franck Perrotin
- Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, médecine fœtale, médecine et biologie de la reproduction, centre Olympe de Gouges, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
- Université de Tours, France
- INSERM U1253 Imaging and Brain (iBrain), Tours, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tantengco OAG, Menon R. Contractile function of the cervix plays a role in normal and pathological pregnancy and parturition. Med Hypotheses 2020; 145:110336. [PMID: 33049595 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The cervix plays an integral part in ensuring the proper timing of pregnancy and parturition. It maintains the fetus within the uterus and protects it from pathogens present in the vaginal canal. The cervix undergoes extensive remodeling during pregnancy and parturition. This process is associated with collagen degradation, an increase in immune cell response and inflammation in the cervix. However, our understanding of the role of cervical smooth muscles and their contribution to cervical remodeling is still lacking. In this paper, we propose that the active contractile function of the cervix influences cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition. Contraction of the cervical smooth muscles helps the cervix to remain firm and closed during early pregnancy, while relaxation of the cervical smooth muscles help facilitate cervical dilatation during labor. This contractile function of the cervix can be influenced by endocrine signals, such as estrogen, progesterone, and oxytocin; local paracrine signals, such as inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, as well as extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes and ectosomes; and by pharmacological agents used for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. A deeper understanding of the role of smooth muscles in cervical remodeling can help us elucidate the cellular processes in the cervix during pregnancy and parturition. This can also help in finding critical signaling pathways and therapeutic targets in the cervix that may decrease the rates of premature cervical ripening and preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ourlad Alzeus G Tantengco
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Perinatal Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Ermita, Manila, Philippines
| | - Ramkumar Menon
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Perinatal Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zakama A, Sobhani NC, Lamar R, Rosenstein MG. Implementation of Evidence-Based Cervical Ripening Protocol: Outcomes and Next Steps. AJP Rep 2020; 10:e408-e412. [PMID: 33294286 PMCID: PMC7714617 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective A prominent randomized controlled trial demonstrated that low-dose misoprostol with the concurrent cervical Foley shortened the median time to delivery when compared with either method alone. Our study aims to address implementation of this protocol and evaluate its impact on time to delivery. Study Design This was a retrospective before-and-after study of nulliparous women who delivered nonanomalous, term, singletons at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) in two separate 2-year periods before and after changes in UCSF's cervical ripening protocol. The primary outcome was time from first misoprostol dose to delivery. Results A total of 1,496 women met inclusion criteria, with 698 in the preimplementation group and 798 in the postimplementation group. There were no statistically significant differences in time to delivery (29 vs. 30 hours, p = 0.69), rate of cesarean delivery (30 vs. 26%, p = 0.09), or cesarean delivery for fetal indications (11 vs. 8%, p = 0.15) between the groups. Conclusion Implementing evidence-based low-dose misoprostol with the concurrent cervical Foley did not change the time to delivery, time to vaginal-delivery, or likelihood of vaginal delivery in our population. This may be due to differences in labor management practices and incomplete fidelity to the protocol. Real-world effectiveness of these interventions will vary and should be considered when choosing an induction method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthurine Zakama
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Nasim C Sobhani
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Robyn Lamar
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Melissa G Rosenstein
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lewis L, Doherty DA, Conwell M, Bradfield Z, Sajogo M, Epee-Bekima M, Hauck YL. Spontaneous vaginal birth following induction with intravenous oxytocin: Three oxytocic regimes to minimise blood loss post birth. Women Birth 2020; 34:e322-e329. [PMID: 32546384 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No evidence was identified in relation to the downward titration/cessation of intravenous oxytocin post spontaneous vaginal birth, in the absence of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH); suggesting clinicians' management is based on personal preference in the absence of evidence. AIM To determine the proportion of induced women with a spontaneous vaginal birth and PPH, when intravenous oxytocin was utilised intrapartum and ceased 15, 30 or 60minutes post birth. METHODS This three armed pilot randomised controlled trial, was undertaken on the Birth Suite of an Australian tertiary obstetric hospital. Incidence of PPH was assessed using univariable and adjusted logistic regression, which compared the effect of titrating intravenous oxytocin post birth on the likelihood of PPH, relative to the 15minute titration group. FINDINGS Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 26% (30 of 115), 20% (23 of 116), and 22% (30 of 134) of women randomised to a 15, 30 and 60minute titration time post birth, with no statistically significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION There was no difference in the incidence of PPH between the three groups. Therefore, we question the benefit of delaying cessation of intravenous oxytocin for 60minutes post birth. Further investigation in this cohort is recommended, to compare the incidence of PPH when intravenous oxytocin is ceased either immediately, or 30minutes post birth. This research is warranted, as an evidence-based framework is lacking, to guide midwives globally in relation to their management of intravenous oxytocin post an induced spontaneous vaginal birth, in the absence of PPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Lewis
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.
| | - Dorota A Doherty
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
| | - Marion Conwell
- Labour and Birth Suite, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.
| | - Zoe Bradfield
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.
| | - Monica Sajogo
- Pharmacy Department, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.
| | - Mathias Epee-Bekima
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia 6008, Australia.
| | - Yvonne L Hauck
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Department of Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Perth, Western Australia, 6008, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17061825. [PMID: 32168947 PMCID: PMC7143495 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Currently, there is no meta-analysis comparing intravaginal misoprostol plus intracervical Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol alone for term pregnancy without identifying risk factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing concurrent intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening. We systematically searched Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Collaboration databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone using the search terms "Foley", "misoprostol", "cervical ripening", and "induction" up to 29 January 2019. Data were extracted and analyzed by two independent reviewers including study characteristics, induction time, cesarean section (C/S), clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis, uterine tachysystole, meconium stain, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Data was pooled using random effects modeling and calculated with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Pooled analysis from eight studies, including 1110 women, showed that labor induction using a combination of intracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol decreased induction time by 2.71 h (95% CI -4.33 to -1.08, p = 0.001), as well as the risk of uterine tachysystole and meconium staining (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.99 and RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, respectively) significantly compared to those using intravaginal misoprostol alone. However, there was no difference in C/S rate (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.78-1.11) or clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis rate (RR 1.22, CI 0.58-2.57) between the two groups. Labor induction with a combination of intracervical Foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol may be a better choice based on advantages in shortening induction time and reducing the risk of uterine tachysystole and meconium staining compared to intravaginal misoprostol alone.
Collapse
|
23
|
Coste Mazeau P, Hessas M, Martin R, Eyraud JL, Margueritte F, Aubard Y, Sallee C, Sire F, Gauthier T. Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess®), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (RE-DINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:51. [PMID: 31915047 PMCID: PMC6950885 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3985-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Labor is induced in over 20% of women in France. Prostaglandins, especially intravaginal dinoprostone (Propess®), are widely used to initiate cervical ripening. If labor does not start within 24 h, there is uncertainty about whether to administer a second dinoprostone pessary or to use oxytocin to induce labor in order to achieve a vaginal delivery. METHODS RE-DINO is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized superiority trial with two parallel arms running in six French hospitals. A total of 360 patients ≥ 18 years of age at > 37 weeks of gestation who exhibit unfavorable cervical conditions (Bishop score < 6) 24 h after placement of the first Propess®, with fetuses in cephalic presentation, will be included. Patients with premature membrane rupture, uterine scars, or multiple pregnancies will be excluded. Our principal objective is to determine whether placement of a second Propess® (followed by oxytocin [Syntocinon®], if necessary) in women for whom the first Propess® failed to induce cervical ripening increases the vaginal delivery rate compared to direct oxytocin injection. The vaginal delivery rate is therefore the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes are the induction failure rates and maternofetal morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION This study may help in determining the optimal way to induce labor after failure of a first Propess®, an unresolved problem to date. This trial explores the effectiveness and safety of placing a second Propess® and may contribute to development of an obstetric consensus. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered on 2 September 2016 at clinicaltrials.gov (identification number NCT02888041).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Coste Mazeau
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France.
| | - M Hessas
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - R Martin
- Clinical Investigation Center, CHRU Limoges, 2 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - J-L Eyraud
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - F Margueritte
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - Y Aubard
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - C Sallee
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - F Sire
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Children's Hospital, Limoges Regional University Hospitals, 8 Avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Intrapartum use of oxytocin. GINECOLOGIA.RO 2020. [DOI: 10.26416/gine.27.1.2020.2883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
25
|
Wei Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Yin B, Chen D, Chen Y, Yu Y, Zhu B, Qin Y, Zhang J, Wang Z. Comparison of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for the Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancy and the Rate of Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Study in Ten Centers in South China. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25:8554-8561. [PMID: 31719513 PMCID: PMC6873645 DOI: 10.12659/msm.918330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dinoprostone is the recommended primary option for induction of labor (IOL) in late-term pregnancies (LTPs). However, oxytocin is used in developing and rural areas, and studies have supported similar effectiveness for oxytocin and dinoprostone in reducing the rate of cesarean delivery of LTPs with a Bishop’s score of between 4–6. This study aimed to compare dinoprostone and oxytocin for IOL in LTPs and the rate of cesarean section in ten centers in South China. Material/Methods A retrospective study included 1,408 women with LTP, with subgroups including a Bishop’s score of 0–3 and 4–6. Rates of cesarean delivery were compared between women given vaginal dinoprostone and intravenous oxytocin for IOL. Secondary outcomes included the duration of labor, and maternal and fetal complications. Results Comparison between women who received oxytocin (N=365) and dinoprostone (N=1,043) showed significantly lower rates of cesarean delivery with dinoprostone, but no significant difference between the subgroups with Bishop’s scores of 0–3 and 4–6. The interval between induction to labor and duration of the active phase of labor were significantly reduced in the dinoprostone group with a Bishop’s score of between 4–6. Conclusions For LTPs with a Bishop’s score of 0–3, dinoprostone was superior to oxytocin for IOL with a lower rate of cesarean delivery, but both agents had a similar outcome for women with a Bishop’s score of 4–6. These findings may have implications for the choice of agent used in IOL when dinoprostone is unavailable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanxing Wei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Xueyuan Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Yinhui Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital of Chancheng, Foshan, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Yuewen Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Baomin Yin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Child Health Hospital, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Dunjin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Yi Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital of Panyu, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Yanping Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiaolan People's Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Bin Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Hexian Memorial Hospital of Panyu, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Yiwei Qin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huadu People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Jianping Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| | - Zhijian Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Vaan MDT, ten Eikelder MLG, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies‐Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KWM, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10:CD001233. [PMID: 31623014 PMCID: PMC6953206 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical methods were the first methods developed to ripen the cervix and induce labour. During recent decades they have been substituted by pharmacological methods. Potential advantages of mechanical methods, compared with pharmacological methods may include reduction in side effects that could improve neonatal outcomes. This is an update of a review first published in 2001, last updated in 2012. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness and safety of mechanical methods for third trimester (> 24 weeks' gestation) induction of labour in comparison with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (vaginal and intracervical), low-dose misoprostol (oral and vaginal), amniotomy or oxytocin. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and reference lists of retrieved studies (9 January 2018). We updated the search in March 2019 and added the search results to the awaiting classification section of the review. SELECTION CRITERIA Clinical trials comparing mechanical methods used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with pharmacological methods.Mechanical methods include: (1) the introduction of a catheter through the cervix into the extra-amniotic space with balloon insufflation; (2) introduction of laminaria tents, or their synthetic equivalent (Dilapan), into the cervical canal; (3) use of a catheter to inject fluid into the extra-amniotic space (EASI).This review includes the following comparisons: (1) specific mechanical methods (balloon catheter, laminaria tents or EASI) compared with prostaglandins (different types, different routes) or with oxytocin; (2) single balloon compared to a double balloon; (3) addition of prostaglandins or oxytocin to mechanical methods compared with prostaglandins or oxytocin alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed risk of bias. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This review update includes a total of 113 trials (22,373 women) contributing data to 21 comparisons. Risk of bias of trials varied. Overall, the evidence was graded from very-low to moderate quality. All evidence was downgraded for lack of blinding and, for many comparisons, the effect estimates were too imprecise to make a valid judgement.Balloon versus vaginal PGE2: there may be little or no difference in vaginal deliveries not achieved within 24 hours (average risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.26; 7 studies; 1685 women; I² = 79%; low-quality evidence) and there probably is little or no difference in caesarean sections (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.09; 28 studies; 6619 women; moderate-quality evidence) between induction of labour with a balloon catheter and vaginal PGE2. A balloon catheter probably reduces the risk of uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.67; 6 studies; 1966 women; moderate-quality evidence), serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.93; 8 studies; 2757 women; moderate-quality evidence) and may slightly reduce the risk of aneonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04; 3647 women; 12 studies; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in serious maternal morbidity or death (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.12; 4 studies; 1481 women) or five-minute Apgar score < 7 (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.14; 4271 women; 14 studies) because the quality of the evidence was found to be very low and low, respectively.Balloon versus low-dose vaginal misoprostol: it is uncertain whether there is a difference in vaginal deliveries not achieved within 24 hours between induction of labour with a balloon catheter and vaginal misoprostol (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.39; 340 women; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). A balloon catheter probably reduces the risk of uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.85; 1322 women; 8 studies; moderate-quality evidence) but may increase the risk of a caesarean section (average RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.60; 1756 women; 12 studies; I² = 45%; low-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.66; 381 women; 3 studies), serious maternal morbidity or death (no events; 4 studies, 464 women), both very low-quality evidence, and five-minute Apgar score < 7 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.97; 941 women; 7 studies) and NICU admissions (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.63; 1302 women; 9 studies) both low-quality evidence.Balloon versus low-dose oral misoprostol: a balloon catheter probably increases the risk of a vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.46; 782 women, 2 studies, and probably slightly increases the risk of a caesarean section (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32; 3178 women; 7 studies; both moderate-quality evidence) when compared to oral misoprostol. It is uncertain whether there is a difference in uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.38; 2033 women; 2 studies), serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.06; 2627 women; 3 studies), both low-quality evidence, serious maternal morbidity or death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.52; 2627 women; 3 studies), very low-quality evidence, five-minute Apgar scores < 7 (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.32; 2693 women; 4 studies) and NICU admissions (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17; 2873 women; 5 studies) both low-quality evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low- to moderate-quality evidence shows mechanical induction with a balloon is probably as effective as induction of labour with vaginal PGE2. However, a balloon seems to have a more favourable safety profile. More research on this comparison does not seem warranted.Moderate-quality evidence shows a balloon catheter may be slightly less effective as oral misoprostol, but it remains unclear if there is a difference in safety outcomes for the neonate. When compared to low-dose vaginal misoprostol, low-quality evidence shows a balloon may be less effective, but probably has a better safety profile.Future research could be focused more on safety aspects for the neonate and maternal satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke DT de Vaan
- Jeroen Bosch HospitalDepartment of ObstetricsHenri Dunantstraat 1's‐HertogenboschNetherlands5223 GZ
- Rotterdam University of Applied SciencesDepartment of Health Care StudiesRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Mieke LG ten Eikelder
- Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS TrustDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyPrincess Alexandra Wing, TreliskeTruroUK
| | - Marta Jozwiak
- Erasmus Medical CenterDr Molewaterplein 40RotterdamNetherlands3015 GD
| | - Kirsten R Palmer
- Monash Health and Monash UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology246 Clayton RoadClaytonVictoriaAustralia3168
| | | | - Kitty WM Bloemenkamp
- Birth Centre Wilhelmina’s Children Hospital, University Medical Center UtrechtDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Women and BabyUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Ben Willem J Mol
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology246 Clayton RoadClaytonVictoriaAustralia3168
| | - Michel Boulvain
- University of Geneva/GHOL‐Nyon HospitalDepartment of Gynecology and ObstetricsNYONSwitzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kehl S, Born T, Weiss C, Faschingbauer F, Pretscher J, Beckmann MW, Sütterlin M, Dammer U. Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2019; 3:100034. [PMID: 31403122 PMCID: PMC6687443 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of induction of labour in obese women using sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol in comparison with oral misoprostol alone. Study design In this cohort study, 400 pregnant women with BMI higher than 35 kg/m2 undergoing labour induction at term were included. Induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter and, if necessary, sequential oral misoprostol (n = 216) was compared to oral misoprostol alone (n = 184). The primary outcome measure was the caesarean section rate. Secondary outcome parameters were, among others, the induction-to-delivery-interval, the rate of vaginal delivery within 24 and 48 h as well as fetal outcome parameters. Results The caesarean section rate was significantly lower in the group with sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol (27.6% versus 37.5%, p = 0.0345). After stratification for parity this reduction was seen especially in nulliparous (38.6% versus 56.9%, p = 0.0039). The rate of abnormal CTG was significantly lower as well (19.9% versus 30.4%, p = 0.0150), particularly in nulliparous (25.9% versus 40.4%, p = 0.0138). Uni- and multivariable analyzes showed that the caesarean section rate was significantly influenced by the method of induction of labour (p = 0.0026), parity (p < 0.0001) and Bishop score (p = 0.0425). Conclusion In obese women, induction of labour with sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol is associated with significantly more normal vaginal deliveries and less caesarean sections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Kehl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Tilman Born
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christel Weiss
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | | | - Jutta Pretscher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Marc Sütterlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Ulf Dammer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pierce S, Bakker R, Myers DA, Edwards RK. Clinical Insights for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Prostaglandins. AJP Rep 2018; 8:e307-e314. [PMID: 30377555 PMCID: PMC6205862 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical ripening is often the first component of labor induction and is used to facilitate the softening and thinning of the cervix in preparation for labor. Common methods used for cervical ripening include both mechanical (e.g., Foley or Cook catheters) and pharmacologic (e.g., prostaglandins) methods. The choice of method(s) for ripening should take into account the patient's medical and obstetric history, clinical characteristics, and risk of adverse effects if uterine tachysystole were to occur. In this narrative review, we highlight the differences between the prostaglandins dinoprostone and misoprostol with respect to pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and potential safety concerns. Practical guidance on choosing an appropriate prostaglandin agent for cervical ripening and labor induction is provided via the use of clinical vignettes. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of each preparation allows clinicians to individualize treatment, depending on the indications for induction and unique characteristics of each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Pierce
- Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Ronan Bakker
- Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Dean A Myers
- Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Rodney K Edwards
- Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Viteri OA, Sibai BM. Challenges and Limitations of Clinical Trials on Labor Induction: A Review of the Literature. AJP Rep 2018; 8:e365-e378. [PMID: 30591843 PMCID: PMC6306280 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Induction of labor is a common obstetric procedure performed in nearly a quarter of all deliveries in the United States. Pharmacological (prostaglandins, oxytocin) and/or mechanical methods (balloon catheters) are commonly used for labor induction; however, there is ongoing debate as to which method is the safest and most effective. This narrative review discusses key limitations of published trials on labor induction, including the lack of well-designed randomized controlled trials directly comparing specific methods of induction, heterogeneous trial populations, and wide variation in the protocols used and outcomes reported. Furthermore, the majority of published trials were underpowered to detect significant differences in the most clinically relevant efficacy and safety outcomes (e.g., cesarean delivery, neonatal mortality). By identifying the limitations of labor induction trials, we hope to highlight the importance of quality published data to better inform guidelines and drive evidence-based treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar A Viteri
- Avera Medical Group Maternal Fetal Medicine, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
| | - Baha M Sibai
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Loktionov D, McCarthy CM, Skehan MC. Does an elective induction policy negatively impact on vaginal delivery rates? A 30-month review of an elective induction policy. Ir J Med Sci 2018; 188:563-567. [PMID: 30121814 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1883-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of induction of labour varies across Health Service Executive hospital regions in Ireland averaging at 23.3 per 100 deliveries in 2005-2009. The increasing rate of elective induction of labour in Ireland calls for more studies looking into associated maternal and/or neonatal outcomes. STUDY AIM The aim of this study is to show that an elective induction policy with management by a sole consultant obstetrician can decrease caesarean section rates as well as positively impact maternal and neonatal complications. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of women attending a named obstetrician over a 1-year period. In total, 22 variables were collected, including basic patient demographics, mode of onset of labour, method of induction, mode of delivery, length of labour and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS In total, 583 patients were identified in the study period. One hundred twenty-six (21.6%) patients presented with a spontaneous onset of labour, and 405 (69.4%) of patients had an induction of labour. Relative risk of having an emergency caesarean section, if labour is induced, is 1.42 (95% CI 0.64 to 3.14), and no statistical significance was demonstrated (p = 0.38). There was a statistically significant difference in operative vaginal delivery versus standard vaginal delivery relative risk between women ≥ 35-year-old and < 35-year-old groups, 0.47 (95% CI 0.39-0.57), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION Elective induction of labour is not associated with an increased risk of caesarean section or operative vaginal delivery in patients less than 35 years of age. This shows that elective induction is an appropriate intervention in selected scenarios without affecting mode of delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Loktionov
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Maternity Hospital Limerick, Ennis Road, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Claire M McCarthy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Maternity Hospital Limerick, Ennis Road, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Mark C Skehan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Maternity Hospital Limerick, Ennis Road, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Induction of labor is a common procedure undertaken whenever the benefits of prompt delivery outweigh the risks of expectant management. Cervical assessment is essential to determine the optimal approach. Indication for induction, clinical presentation and history, safety, cost, and patient preference may factor into the selection of methods. For the unfavorable cervix, several pharmacologic and mechanical methods are available, each with associated advantages and disadvantages. In women with a favorable cervix, combined use of amniotomy and intravenous oxytocin is generally the most effective approach. The goal of labor induction is to ensure the best possible outcome for mother and newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Penfield
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1400, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
| | - Deborah A Wing
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1400, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Medley N, Dias S, Jones LV, Gyte G, Caldwell DM. Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-584. [PMID: 27587290 DOI: 10.3310/hta20650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 150,000 pregnant women in England and Wales have their labour induced each year. Multiple pharmacological, mechanical and complementary methods are available to induce labour. OBJECTIVE To assess the relative effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of labour induction methods and, data permitting, effects in different clinical subgroups. METHODS We carried out a systematic review using Cochrane methods. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register was searched (March 2014). This contains over 22,000 reports of controlled trials (published from 1923 onwards) retrieved from weekly searches of OVID MEDLINE (1966 to current); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library); EMBASE (1982 to current); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1984 to current); ClinicalTrials.gov; the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Portal; and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings and journals. We included randomised controlled trials examining interventions to induce labour compared with placebo, no treatment or other interventions in women eligible for third-trimester induction. We included outcomes relating to efficacy, safety and acceptability to women. In addition, for the economic analysis we searched the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Economic Evaluations Databases, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Assessment database. We carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using all of the available evidence, both direct and indirect, to produce estimates of the relative effects of each treatment compared with others in a network. We developed a de novo decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of various methods. The costs included were the intervention and other hospital costs incurred (price year 2012-13). We reviewed the literature to identify preference-based utilities for the health-related outcomes in the model. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, expected costs, utilities and net benefit. We represent uncertainty in the optimal intervention using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS We identified 1190 studies; 611 were eligible for inclusion. The interventions most likely to achieve vaginal delivery (VD) within 24 hours were intravenous oxytocin with amniotomy [posterior rank 2; 95% credible intervals (CrIs) 1 to 9] and higher-dose (≥ 50 µg) vaginal misoprostol (rank 3; 95% CrI 1 to 6). Compared with placebo, several treatments reduced the odds of caesarean section, but we observed considerable uncertainty in treatment rankings. For uterine hyperstimulation, double-balloon catheter had the highest probability of being among the best three treatments, whereas vaginal misoprostol (≥ 50 µg) was most likely to increase the odds of excessive uterine activity. For other safety outcomes there were insufficient data or there was too much uncertainty to identify which treatments performed 'best'. Few studies collected information on women's views. Owing to incomplete reporting of the VD within 24 hours outcome, the cost-effectiveness analysis could compare only 20 interventions. The analysis suggested that most interventions have similar utility and differ mainly in cost. With a caveat of considerable uncertainty, titrated (low-dose) misoprostol solution and buccal/sublingual misoprostol had the highest likelihood of being cost-effective. LIMITATIONS There was considerable uncertainty in findings and there were insufficient data for some planned subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS Overall, misoprostol and oxytocin with amniotomy (for women with favourable cervix) is more successful than other agents in achieving VD within 24 hours. The ranking according to safety of different methods was less clear. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that titrated (low-dose) oral misoprostol solution resulted in the highest utility, whereas buccal/sublingual misoprostol had the lowest cost. There was a high degree of uncertainty as to the most cost-effective intervention. FUTURE WORK Future trials should be powered to detect a method that is more cost-effective than misoprostol solution and report outcomes included in this NMA. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005116. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zarko Alfirevic
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Edna Keeney
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Therese Dowswell
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicky J Welton
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nancy Medley
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sofia Dias
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leanne V Jones
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gillian Gyte
- Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Deborah M Caldwell
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction. The use of complementary therapies is increasing. Women may look to complementary therapies during pregnancy and childbirth to be used alongside conventional medical practice. Acupuncture involves the insertion of very fine needles into specific points of the body. Acupressure is using the thumbs or fingers to apply pressure to specific points. The limited observational studies to date suggest acupuncture for induction of labour has no known adverse effects to the fetus, and may be effective. However, the evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of this technique is limited. OBJECTIVES To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and acupressure for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 November 2016), PubMed (1966 to 25 November 2016), ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (25 November 2016), CINAHL (25 November 2016), Embase (25 November 2016), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Portal (ICTRP) (3 October 2016), and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing acupuncture or acupressure, used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction, with placebo/no treatment or other methods on a predefined list of labour induction methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked them for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS This updated review includes 22 trials, reporting on 3456 women. The trials using manual or electro-acupuncture were compared with usual care (eight trials, 760 women), sweeping of membranes (one trial, 207 women), or sham controls (seven trials, 729 women). Trials using acupressure were compared with usual care (two trials, 151 women) or sham controls (two trials, 239 women). Many studies had a moderate risk of bias.Overall, few trials reported on primary outcomes. No trial reported vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours and uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes. Serious maternal and neonatal death or morbidity were only reported under acupuncture versus sham control. Acupuncture versus sham control There was no clear difference in caesarean sections between groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.15, eight trials, 789 women; high-quality evidence). There were no reports of maternal death or perinatal death in the one trial that reported this outcome. There was evidence of a benefit from acupuncture in improving cervical readiness for labour (mean difference (MD) 0.40, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.69, one trial, 125 women), as measured by cervical maturity within 24 hours using Bishop's score. There was no evidence of a difference between groups for oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia, instrumental vaginal birth, meconium-stained liquor, Apgar score < 7 at five minutes, neonatal intensive care admission, maternal infection, postpartum bleeding greater than 500 mL, time from the trial to time of birth, use of induction methods, length of labour, and spontaneous vaginal birth. Acupuncture versus usual care There was no clear difference in caesarean sections between groups (average RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.17, eight trials, 760 women; low-quality evidence). There was an increase in cervical maturation for the acupuncture (electro) group compared with control (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.49, one trial, 67 women) and a shorter length of labour (minutes) in the usual care group compared to electro-acupuncture (MD 124.00, 95% CI 37.39 to 210.61, one trial, 67 women).There appeared be a differential effect according to type of acupuncture based on subgroup analysis. Electro-acupuncture appeared to have more of an effect than manual acupuncture for the outcomes caesarean section (CS), and instrumental vaginal and spontaneous vaginal birth. It decreased the rate of CS (average RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.80, 3 trials, 327 women), increased the rate of instrumental vaginal birth (average RR 2.30, 95%CI 1.15 to 4.60, two trials, 271 women), and increased the rate of spontaneous vaginal birth (average RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.56, one trial, 72 women). However, subgroup analyses are observational in nature and so results should be interpreted with caution.There were no clear differences between groups for other outcomes: oxytocin augmentation, use of epidural analgesia, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care admission, maternal infection, perineal tear, fetal infection, maternal satisfaction, use of other induction methods, and postpartum bleeding greater than 500 mL. Acupuncture versus sweeping if fetal membranes One trial of acupuncture versus sweeping of fetal membranes showed no clear differences between groups in caesarean sections (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.22, one trial, 207 women, moderate-quality evidence), need for augmentation, epidural analgesia, instrumental vaginal birth, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care admission, and postpartum bleeding greater than 500 mL. Acupressure versus sham control There was no evidence of benefit from acupressure in reducing caesarean sections compared to control (RR, 0.94, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.30, two trials, 239 women, moderate-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a clear benefit in reduced oxytocin augmentation, instrumental vaginal birth, meconium-stained liquor, time from trial intervention to birth of the baby, and spontaneous vaginal birth. Acupressure versus usual care There was no evidence of benefit from acupressure in reducing caesarean sections compared to usual care (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.53, two trials, 151 women, moderate-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a clear benefit in reduced epidural analgesia, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, admission to neonatal intensive care, time from trial intervention to birth of the baby, use of other induction methods, and spontaneous vaginal birth. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, there was no clear benefit from acupuncture or acupressure in reducing caesarean section rate. The quality of the evidence varied between low to high. Few trials reported on neonatal morbidity or maternal mortality outcomes. Acupuncture showed some benefit in improving cervical maturity, however, more well-designed trials are needed. Future trials could include clinically relevant safety outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Smith
- Western Sydney UniversityNational Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM)Locked Bag 1797SydneyNew South WalesAustralia2751
| | - Mike Armour
- Western Sydney UniversityNational Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM)Locked Bag 1797SydneyNew South WalesAustralia2751
| | - Hannah G Dahlen
- Western Sydney UniversitySchool of Nursing and MidwiferyLocked Bag 1797PenrithNSWAustralia2751
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bernardes T, Groen H. Authors' reply re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials. BJOG 2017; 124:983-984. [PMID: 28429434 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henk Groen
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carbillon L. Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials: Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate. BJOG 2017; 124:982-983. [PMID: 28429437 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Carbillon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Paris 13 University, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sometimes it is necessary to bring on labour artificially because of safety concerns for the mother or baby. This review is one of a series of reviews of methods of labour induction using a standardised protocol. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of NO donors (isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN), isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside) for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour, in comparison with placebo or no treatment or other treatments from a predefined hierarchy. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (15 August 2016) and the reference lists of trial reports. SELECTION CRITERIA Clinical trials comparing NO donors for cervical ripening or labour induction with other methods listed above it on a predefined list of methods of labour induction. Interventions include NO donors (isosorbide mononitrate, isosorbide dinitrate, nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside) compared with other methods listed above it on a predefined list of methods of labour induction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS This review is part of a series of reviews focusing on methods of induction of labour, based on a generic protocol. Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. In this update, the quality of the evidence for the main comparison was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 23 trials (including a total of 4777 women). Included studies compared NO donors with placebo, vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), intracervical PGE2, vaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter. The majority of the included studies were assessed as being at low risk of bias. Nitric oxide versus placebo There was no evidence of a difference for any of the primary outcomes analysed: vaginal delivery not achieved in 24 hours (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.15; one trial, 238 women; low-quality evidence), uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.62; two trials, 300 women; low-quality evidence), caesarean section (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.11; nine trials, 2624 women; moderate-quality evidence) or serious neonatal morbidity/perinatal death (average RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.08 to 33.26; two trials, 1712 women; low-quality evidence). There were no instances of serious maternal morbidity or death (one study reported this outcome).There was a reduction in an unfavourable cervix at 12 to 24 hours in women treated with NO donors (average RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.90; four trials, 762 women), and this difference was observed in both subgroups of standard release and slow release formulation. Women who received NO donors were less likely to experience uterine hyperstimulation without FHR rate changes (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.80; one trial, 200 women), and more likely to experience side effects, including nausea, headache and vomiting. Nitric oxide donors versus vaginal prostaglandins There was no evidence of any difference between groups for uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes or caesarean section (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.21; three trials, 571 women). Serious neonatal morbidity and serious maternal morbidity were not reported. There were fewer women in the NO donor group who did not achieve a vaginal delivery within 24 hours (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.86; one trial, 400 primiparae women). Nitric oxide donors versus intracervical prostaglandins One study reported a reduction in the number of women who had not achieved a vaginal delivery within 24 hours with NO donors (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.86; one trial, 400 women). This result should be interpreted with caution as the information was extracted from an abstract only and a full report of the study is awaited. No differences were observed between groups for uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.74; one trial, 42 women) or serious neonatal morbidity/perinatal death (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.74; one trial, 42 women). Fewer women in the NO donor group underwent a caesarean section in comparison to women who received intracervical prostaglandins (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.90; two trials, 442 women). No study reported on the outcome serious maternal morbidity or death. Nitric oxide donors versus vaginal misoprostol There was a reduction in the rate of uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes with NO donors (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.37; three trials, 281 women). There were no differences in caesarean section rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21; 761 women; six trials) and no cases of serious neonatal morbidity/perinatal death were reported. One study found that women in the NO donor group were more likely to not deliver within 24 hours (RR 5.33, 95% CI 1.62 to 17.55; one trial, 150 women). Serious maternal morbidity or death was not reported.In terms of secondary outcomes, there was an increase in cervix unchanged/unfavourable with NO (RR 3.43, 95% CI 2.07 to 5.66; two trials, 151 women) and an increase in the need for oxytocin augmentation with NO induction (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.45; 7 trials; 767 women), although there was evidence of significant heterogeneity which could not be fully explained. Uterine hyperstimulation without FHR was lower in the NO group, as was meconium-stained liquor, Apgar score less than seven at five minutes and analgesia requirements. Nitric oxide donors versus intracervical catheter There was no evidence on any difference between the effects of NO and the use of a Foley catheter for induction of labour for caesarean section (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.59; one trial, 80 women). No other primary outcomes were reported. One study of 75 participants did not contribute any data to the review.For all comparisons, women who received NO donors were more likely to experience side effects such as headache, nausea or vomiting. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Available data suggests that NO donors can be a useful tool in the process of induction of labour causing the cervix to be more favourable in comparison to placebo. However, additional data are needed to assess the true impact of NO donors on all important labour process and delivery outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpita Ghosh
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS TrustDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyEastern RoadBrightonUKBN2 5BE
| | - Katherine R Lattey
- St Mary's HospitalDepartment of General MedicinePraed StreetLondonUKW2 1NY
| | - Anthony J Kelly
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS TrustDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyEastern RoadBrightonUKBN2 5BE
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:1357-1364. [PMID: 27824758 PMCID: PMC5127406 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of four commonly used induction methods. METHODS This randomized trial compared four induction methods: misoprostol alone, Foley alone, misoprostol-cervical Foley concurrently, and Foley-oxytocin concurrently. Women undergoing labor induction with full-term (37 weeks of gestation or greater), singleton, vertex-presenting gestations, with no contraindication to vaginal delivery, intact membranes, Bishop score 6 or less, and cervical dilation 2 cm or less were included. Women were enrolled only once during the study period. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Neither patients nor health care providers were blinded to assigned treatment group because examinations are required for placement of all methods; however, research personnel were blinded during data abstraction. A sample size of 123 per group (n=492) was planned to compare the four groups pairwise (P≤.008) with a 4-hour reduction in delivery time considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS From May 2013 through June 2015, 997 women were screened and 491 were randomized and analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the four treatment groups. When comparing all induction method groups, combination methods achieved a faster median time to delivery than single-agent methods (misoprostol-Foley: 13.1 hours, Foley-oxytocin: 14.5 hours, misoprostol: 17.6 hours, Foley: 17.7 hours, P<.001). When censored for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, women who received misoprostol-Foley were almost twice as likely to deliver before women who received misoprostol alone (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.59) or Foley alone (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% CI 1.87 1.39-2.52), whereas Foley-oxytocin was not statistically different from single-agent methods. CONCLUSION After censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity, misoprostol-cervical Foley resulted in twice the chance of delivering before either single-agent method. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01916681.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa D. Levine
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katheryne L. Downes
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michal A. Elovitz
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Samuel Parry
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary D. Sammel
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Women’s Health Clinical Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sindhu K Srinivas
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alvares GA, Quintana DS, Whitehouse AJ. Beyond the hype and hope: Critical considerations for intranasal oxytocin research in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 2016; 10:25-41. [DOI: 10.1002/aur.1692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gail A. Alvares
- Telethon Kids Institute; The University of Western Australia; Perth Western Australia Australia
- Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC); Long Pocket Brisbane, Queensland Australia
| | - Daniel S. Quintana
- NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction; Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo; Oslo Norway
| | - Andrew J.O. Whitehouse
- Telethon Kids Institute; The University of Western Australia; Perth Western Australia Australia
- Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC); Long Pocket Brisbane, Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kehl S, Böhm L, Weiss C, Heimrich J, Dammer U, Baier F, Sütterlin M, Beckmann MW, Faschingbauer F. Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016; 42:1495-1501. [PMID: 27642010 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM The best time to commence cervical ripening with a balloon catheter is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether application of a balloon catheter in the morning or in the evening is better when sequential prostaglandin application is planned. METHODS This multicenter historical cohort study included 415 women with an unfavorable cervix undergoing labor induction at term. Labor was induced with a double-balloon catheter and the sequential use of oral misoprostol if necessary. The balloon catheter was placed in the morning group between 02:00-15:00 and in the evening group between 15:00-02:00. The primary outcome measure was the cesarean section rate. Secondary outcome measures included failed labor induction (no vaginal delivery within 72 h). RESULTS The cesarean section rate did not differ between the groups (morning 26.9%, evening 24.3%; P = 0.5553); however, more women in the morning group did not deliver within 72 h (8.8% vs 3.1%; P = 0.0138). In nulliparous women, labor induction failed more often in the morning group (12% vs. 4%, P = 0.043). In parous women, the induction-to-delivery interval was longer in the morning group (1756 vs. 1349 min; P = 0.046), and there were fewer deliveries within 24 h (35% vs. 56%, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS When sequential use of a double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for labor induction is planned, the preferable time for catheter placement is in the evening. This resulted in fewer failed inductions in nulliparous women and a shorter induction-to-delivery interval and more deliveries within 24 h in parous women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Kehl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany.
| | - Lena Böhm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christel Weiss
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jutta Heimrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Ulf Dammer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Friederike Baier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | - Marc Sütterlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Seelke A, Yuan SM, Perkeybile A, Krubitzer L, Bales K. Early experiences can alter the size of cortical fields in prairie voles ( Microtus ochrogaster). ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENETICS 2016; 2:dvw019. [PMID: 27818789 PMCID: PMC5094187 DOI: 10.1093/eep/dvw019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The neocortex of the prairie vole is composed of three well-defined sensory areas and one motor area: primary somatosensory, visual, auditory areas and the primary motor area respectively. The boundaries of these cortical areas are identifiable very early in development, and have been thought to resist alteration by all but the most extreme physical or genetic manipulations. Here we assessed the extent to which the boundaries of sensory/motor cortical areas can be altered by exposing young prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) to a chronic stimulus, high or low levels of parental contact, or an acute stimulus, a single dose of saline, oxytocin (OT), or oxytocin antagonist on the day of birth. When animals reached adulthood, their brains were removed, the cortex was flattened, cut parallel to the pial surface, and stained for myelin to identify the architectonic boundaries of sensory and motor areas. We measured the overall proportion of cortex that was myelinated, as well as the proportion of cortex devoted to the sensory and motor areas. Both the chronic and acute manipulations were linked to significant alterations in areal boundaries of cortical fields, but the areas affected differed with different conditions. Thus, differences in parental care and early exposure to OT can both change cortical organization, but their effects are not identical. Furthermore, the effects of both manipulations were sexually dimorphic, with a greater number of statistically significant differences in females than in males. These results indicate that early environmental experience, both through exposure to exogenous neuropeptides and parental contact, can alter the size of cortical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.M.H. Seelke
- Psychology Department, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - S.-M. Yuan
- Psychology Department, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - L.A. Krubitzer
- Psychology Department, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - K.L. Bales
- Psychology Department, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abediasl Z, Sheikh M, Pooransari P, Farahani Z, Kalani F. Vaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for the management of second-trimester pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death: A randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 42:246-51. [PMID: 26663590 DOI: 10.1111/jog.12910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2015] [Revised: 10/18/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to compare vaginal misoprostol versus intravenous (i.v.) oxytocin in the management of pregnancies with second-trimester intrauterine fetal death (IUFD). METHODS This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 85 pregnant women with IUFD and unripe cervix who were admitted for labor induction. Forty were randomly allocated to receive 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol every 12 h, and 45 were randomly assigned to receive high-dose i.v. oxytocin (starting from 6 mU/min to reach the maximum dose of 40 mU/min). This study is registered at www.irct.ir (IRCT201307159568N5). RESULTS The induction-to-delivery interval in the misoprostol group (10.5 ± 5.3 [range 4-27] h) was significantly lower than that in the oxytocin group (14 ± 6.8 [range 4-30] h) (P = 0.009). The total hospital stay in the misoprostol group (22.6 ± 9.5 [range 12-48] h) was significantly lower than that in the oxytocin group (35.3 ± 16.4 [range 12-72] h) (P = 0.000). Although the successful induction rate was higher in the misoprostol group, this was not significant (95% vs 86.7%, P = 0.1). Placenta retention occurred more in the oxytocin group (20% vs 5%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION Both vaginal misoprostol and high-dose i.v. oxytocin are highly effective in labor induction in second-trimester pregnancies with IUFD and an unripe cervix. However, vaginal misoprostol seems to be superior to i.v. oxytocin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhila Abediasl
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Shariati Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
| | - Mahdi Sheikh
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parichehr Pooransari
- Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Farahani
- Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farah Kalani
- Shariati Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Bodea-Braescu AV, Biggio JR, Lin MG. Foley catheter for induction of labor: potential barriers to adopting the technique. J Perinatol 2015; 35:996-9. [PMID: 26468934 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2015] [Revised: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate if a learning curve exists for cervical Foley placement for labor induction in women with unfavorable cervices and whether labor curves differ compared with the dinoprostone insert (PGE2). STUDY DESIGN We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. RESULT For Foley and PGE2, successful placement occurred in 157/185 (85%) and 188/191 (98%) women (P<0.001). Unsuccessful Foley placements decreased over time (P=0.005); all occurred at the site previously using PGE2 preferentially. In women with allocated agent placed successfully who achieved complete cervical dilation, median progress with Foley (n=112), compared with PGE2 (n=123), was: 1-3 cm (6.2 vs 14.1 h; P<0.001), 3-6 cm (11.1 vs 6.7 h; P<0.001) and 6-10 cm (1.9 vs 1.5 h; P=0.14). CONCLUSION There is a learning curve for placing cervical Foley catheters. Despite faster times to delivery, Foley is associated with slower dilation from 3 to 6 cm compared with PGE2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R K Edwards
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, Women and Infants Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J M Szychowski
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, Women and Infants Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - A V Bodea-Braescu
- Phoenix Perinatal Associates; Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Obstetrix/Mednax; Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - J R Biggio
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, Women and Infants Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - M G Lin
- Phoenix Perinatal Associates; Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Obstetrix/Mednax; Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Pharmacologic methods for induction of labor have been used for many decades. Pharmacologic agents have an advantage over mechanical methods in that they can be used during both the initial cervical ripening stage of induction and throughout the second stage of labor. Pharmacologic induction agents such as prostaglandins and oxytocin are commonly used for labor and delivery floors and are well established for use in cervical ripening. Nitric oxide donors and mifepristone are known agents in medicine but are new and actively studied in the area of cervical ripening. These agents are introduced and analyzed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Gilstrop
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health Systems, 4755 Ogletown Stanton Road, Wilmington, DE 19807
| | - Anthony Sciscione
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health Systems, 4755 Ogletown Stanton Road, Wilmington, DE 19807.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kehl S, Weiss C, Dammer U, Raabe E, Burghaus S, Heimrich J, Hackl J, Winkler M, Beckmann MW, Faschingbauer F. Induction of Labour: Change of Method and its Effects. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75:238-243. [PMID: 25914416 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Revised: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The combination of mechanical and drug procedures for the induction of labour seems to be beneficial. Accordingly, the normal procedure in clinical routine has been changed and induction of labour by means of a balloon catheter has been implemented. The aim of this study was to find out if this procedural change has resulted in a more effective induction of labour. Materials and Method: In this historical cohort study 230 inductions of labour at term in the year 2012 were compared with 291 inductions of labour in the year 2013, all at the University of Erlangen Perinatal Centre. Exclusion criteria were, among others, a multiple pregnancy, a premature rupture of membranes and a prior Caesarean section. In 2012 births were induced solely by use of the drugs dinoprostone and misoprostol, in 2013 not only with misoprostol but also mainly by use of a balloon catheter. The primary target parameter was the rate of failed labour inductions, defined as "no birth within 72 hours". Results: Altogether 521 inductions of labour were analysed. The rate of failed inductions of labour could be reduced by the changes in induction method (first-time mothers: 23 vs. 9 %, p = 0.0059; multiparous women: 10 vs. 1 %, p = 0.0204). Furthermore, the rate of primary Caesarean sections due to failed induction of labour (5.7 vs. 1.4 %, p = 0.0064), that of the observation of green amniotic fluid (first-time mothers: 23 vs. 9 %, p = 0.0059; multiparous women: 10 vs. 1 %, p = 0.0204) and of infantile infections (first-time mothers: 23 vs. 9 %, p = 0.0059; multiparous women: 10 vs. 1 %, p = 0.0204) were all reduced as well. Conclusion: The routine use of a balloon catheter for induction of labour has markedly improved the procedure. There were fewer failed labour inductions and fewer Caesarean sections due to failed induction of labour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kehl
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - C Weiss
- Abteilung für Medizinische Statistik, Biomathematik und Informationsverarbeitung, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
| | - U Dammer
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - E Raabe
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - S Burghaus
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - J Heimrich
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - J Hackl
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - M Winkler
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - M W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Begley CM. Intervention or interference? The need for expectant care throughout normal labour. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2014; 5:160-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2014.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2014] [Revised: 09/22/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
46
|
Budden A, Chen LJY, Henry A. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD009701. [PMID: 25300173 PMCID: PMC8932234 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009701.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When women require induction of labour, oxytocin is the most common agent used, delivered by an intravenous infusion titrated to uterine contraction strength and frequency. There is debate over the optimum dose regimen and how it impacts on maternal and fetal outcomes, particularly induction to birth interval, mode of birth, and rates of hyperstimulation. Current induction of labour regimens include both high- and low-dose regimens and are delivered by either continuous or pulsed infusions, with both linear and non-linear incremental increases in oxytocin dose. Whilst low-dose protocols bring on contractions safely, their potentially slow induction to birth interval may increase the chance of fetal infection and chorioamnionitis. Conversely, high-dose protocols may cause undue uterine hyperstimulation and fetal distress. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose oxytocin for induction of labour at term SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2014) and the reference lists of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared oxytocin protocol for induction of labour for women at term, where high-dose oxytocin is at least 100 mU oxytocin in the first 40 minutes, with increments delivering at least 600 mU in the first two hours, compared with low-dose oxytocin, defined as less than 100 mU oxytocin in the first 40 minutes, and increments delivering less than 600 mU total in the first two hours. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS We have included nine trials, involving 2391 women and their babies in this review. Trials were at a moderate to high risk of bias overall.Results of primary outcomes revealed no significant differences in rates of vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours (risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.14, two trials, 1339 women) or caesarean section (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14, eight trials, 2023 women). There was no difference in serious maternal morbidity or death (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.82, one trial, 523 women), and no difference in serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.12, one trial, 781 infants). Finally, no trials reported on the number of women who had uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes.Results of secondary outcomes revealed no difference between time from induction to delivery (mean difference (MD) -0.90 hours, 95% CI -2.28 to +0.49 hours; five studies), uterine rupture (RR 3.10, 95% CI 0.50 to 19.33; three trials), epidural analgesia (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18; two trials), instrumental birth (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.66; three trials), Apgar less than seven at five minutes (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.01, five trials), perinatal death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.12; two trials), postpartum haemorrhage (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.34; five trials), or endometritis (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.53 to 3.43; three trials). Removal of high bias studies reveals a significant reduction of induction to delivery interval (MD -1.94 hours, 95% CI -0.99 to -2.89 hours, 489 women). A significant increase in hyperstimulation without specifying fetal heart rate changes was found in the high-dose group (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.25).No other secondary outcomes were reported: unchanged/unfavourable cervix after 12 to 24 hours, meconium-stained liquor, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal encephalopathy, disability in childhood, other maternal side-effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea), maternal antibiotic use, maternal satisfaction, neonatal infection and neonatal antibiotic use. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings of our review do not provide evidence that high-dose oxytocin increases either vaginal delivery within 24 hours or the caesarean section rate. There is no significant decrease in induction to delivery time at meta-analysis but these results may be confounded by poor quality trials. High-dose oxytocin was shown to increase the rate of uterine hyperstimulation but the effects of this are not clear. The conclusions here are specific to the definitions used in this review. Further trials evaluating the effects of high-dose regimens of oxytocin for induction of labour should consider all important maternal and infant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Budden
- Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia; The University of New South WalesObstetrics and GynaecologySydneyAustralia
| | - Lily JY Chen
- Bankstown‐Lidcombe Hospital70 Eldridge RoadBankstownSydneyNew South WalesAustralia2200
| | - Amanda Henry
- University of New South WalesSchool of Women's and Children's HealthRoyal Hospital for WomenRandwickNew South WalesAustralia2031
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Berndl A, El-Chaar D, Murphy K, McDonald S. Does Cervical Ripening at Term Using a High Volume Foley Catheter Result in a Lower Caesarean Section Rate Than a Low Volume Foley Catheter? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2014; 36:678-687. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30509-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
48
|
Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD003101. [PMID: 24941907 PMCID: PMC7138281 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003101.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostaglandins have been used for induction of labour since the 1960s. This is one of a series of reviews evaluating methods of induction of labour. This review focuses on prostaglandins given per vaginam, evaluating these in comparison with placebo (or expectant management) and with each other; prostaglandins (PGE2 and PGF2a); different formulations (gels, tablets, pessaries) and doses. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of vaginal prostaglandins E2 and F2a for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour in comparison with placebo/no treatment or other vaginal prostaglandins (except misoprostol). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 March 2014) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA Clinical trials comparing vaginal prostaglandins used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment, with each other, or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed studies and extracted data independently. MAIN RESULTS Seventy randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (11,487 women) are included. In this update seven new RCTs (778 women) have been added. Two of these new trials compare PGE2 with no treatment, four compare different PGE2 formulations (gels versus tablets, or sustained release pessaries) and one trial compares PGF2a with placebo. The majority of trials were at unclear risk of bias for most domains.Overall, vaginal prostaglandin E2 compared with placebo or no treatment probably reduces the likelihood of vaginal delivery not being achieved within 24 hours. The risk of uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes is increased (4.8% versus 1.0%, risk ratio (RR) 3.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67 to 5.98, 15 trials, 1359 women). The caesarean section rate is probably reduced by about 10% (13.5% versus 14.8%, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.02, 36 trials, 6599 women). The overall effect on improving maternal and fetal outcomes (across a variety of measures) is uncertain.PGE2 tablets, gels and pessaries (including sustained release preparations) appear to be as effective as each other, small differences are detected between some outcomes, but these maybe due to chance. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Prostaglandins PGE2 probably increase the chance of vaginal delivery in 24 hours, they increase uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart changes but do not effect or may reduce caesarean section rates. They increase the likelihood of cervical change, with no increase in operative delivery rates. PGE2 tablets, gels and pessaries appear to be as effective as each other, any differences between formulations are marginal but may be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Thomas
- The University of LiverpoolC/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | - Anna Fairclough
- University of OxfordWorcester CollegeWalton StreetOxfordUKOX1 2HB
| | - Josephine Kavanagh
- The University of LiverpoolC/o Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | - Anthony J Kelly
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS TrustDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRoyal Sussex County HospitalEastern RoadBrightonUKBN2 5BE
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Misoprostol is an orally active prostaglandin. In most countries misoprostol is not licensed for labour induction, but its use is common because it is cheap and heat stable. OBJECTIVES To assess the use of oral misoprostol for labour induction in women with a viable fetus. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (17 January 2014). SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing oral misoprostol versus placebo or other methods, given to women with a viable fetus for labour induction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial data, using centrally-designed data sheets. MAIN RESULTS Overall there were 76 trials (14,412) women) which were of mixed quality.In nine trials comparing oral misoprostol with placebo (1109 women), women using oral misoprostol were more likely to give birth vaginally within 24 hours (risk ratio (RR) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.49; one trial; 96 women), need less oxytocin (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.49; seven trials; 933 women) and have a lower caesarean section rate (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.95; eight trials; 1029 women).In 12 trials comparing oral misoprostol with vaginal dinoprostone (3859 women), women given oral misoprostol were less likely to need a caesarean section (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99; 11 trials; 3592 women). There was some evidence that they had slower inductions, but there were no other statistically significant differences.Nine trials (1282 women) compared oral misoprostol with intravenous oxytocin. The caesarean section rate was significantly lower in women who received oral misoprostol (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.98; nine trials; 1282 women), but they had increased rates of meconium-stained liquor (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.60; seven trials; 1172 women).Thirty-seven trials (6417 women) compared oral and vaginal misoprostol and found no statistically significant difference in the primary outcomes of serious neonatal morbidity/death or serious maternal morbidity or death. The results for vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours, uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes, and caesarean section were highly heterogenous - for uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes this was related to dosage with lower rates in those with lower doses of oral misoprostol. However, there were fewer babies born with a low Apgar score in the oral group (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.82; 19 trials; 4009 babies) and a decrease in postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.95; 10 trials; 1478 women). However, the oral misoprostol group had an increase in meconium-stained liquor (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.44; 24 trials; 3634 women). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Oral misoprostol as an induction agent is effective at achieving vaginal birth. It is more effective than placebo, as effective as vaginal misoprostol and results in fewer caesarean sections than vaginal dinoprostone or oxytocin.Where misoprostol remains unlicensed for the induction of labour, many practitioners will prefer to use a licensed product like dinoprostone. If using oral misoprostol, the evidence suggests that the dose should be 20 to 25 mcg in solution. Given that safety is the primary concern, the evidence supports the use of oral regimens over vaginal regimens. This is especially important in situations where the risk of ascending infection is high and the lack of staff means that women cannot be intensely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zarko Alfirevic
- The University of LiverpoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | - Nasreen Aflaifel
- The University of LiverpoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | - Andrew Weeks
- The University of LiverpoolDepartment of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the most current literature in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to obstetrical care providers on induction of labour. OPTIONS Intervention in a pregnancy with induction of labour. OUTCOMES Appropriate timing and method of induction, appropriate mode of delivery, and optimal maternal and perinatal outcomes. EVIDENCE Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2010 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., labour, induced, labour induction, cervical ripening) and key words (e.g., induce, induction, augmentation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to the end of 2010. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The evidence in this document was rated using criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care (Table 1). SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Prostaglandins E(2) (cervical and vaginal) are effective agents of cervical ripening and induction of labour for an unfavourable cervix. (I) 2. Intravaginal prostaglandins E(2) are preferred to intracervical prostaglandins E(2) because they results in more timely vaginal deliveries. (I).
Collapse
|