1
|
Hammer N, Hoessly L, Haidar F, Hirzel C, de Seigneux S, van Delden C, Vogt B, Sidler D, Neofytos D. Pitfalls in Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12712. [PMID: 38784442 PMCID: PMC11112565 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Valganciclovir (VGC) is administered as prophylaxis to kidney transplant recipients (KTR) CMV donor (D)+/recipient (R)- and CMV R+ after thymoglobulin-induction (R+/TG). Although VGC dose adjustments based on renal function are recommended, there is paucity of real-life data on VGC dosing and associations with clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective Swiss Transplant Cohort Study-embedded observational study, including all adult D+/R- and R+/TG KTR between 2010 and 2020, who received prophylaxis with VGC. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of inappropriately (under- or over-) dosed VGC week-entries. Secondary objectives included breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) and potential associations between breakthrough-csCMVi and cytopenias with VGC dosing. Among 178 KTR, 131 (73.6%) patients had ≥2 week-entries for the longitudinal data of interest and were included in the outcome analysis, with 1,032 VGC dose week-entries. Overall, 460/1,032 (44.6%) were appropriately dosed, while 234/1,032 (22.7%) and 338/1,032 (32.8%) were under- and over-dosed, respectively. Nineteen (14.5%) patients had a breakthrough-csCMVi, without any associations identified with VCG dosing (p = 0.44). Unlike other cytopenias, a significant association between VGC overdosing and lymphopenia (OR 5.27, 95% CI 1.71-16.22, p = 0.004) was shown. VGC prophylaxis in KTR is frequently inappropriately dosed, albeit without meaningful clinical associations, neither in terms of efficacy nor safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Hammer
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Linard Hoessly
- Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fadi Haidar
- Service of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Hirzel
- Service of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sophie de Seigneux
- Service of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian van Delden
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, Service of Infectious Diseases, HUG, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Vogt
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Sidler
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dionysios Neofytos
- Transplant Infectious Diseases Unit, Service of Infectious Diseases, HUG, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vernooij RW, Michael M, Ladhani M, Webster AC, Strippoli GF, Craig JC, Hodson EM. Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 5:CD003774. [PMID: 38700045 PMCID: PMC11066972 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003774.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis to prevent the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008 and 2013. OBJECTIVES To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause death in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 February 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications or different regimens of the same antiviral medications for CMV prophylaxis in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection are studied in a separate review and were excluded from this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS This 2024 update found four new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 41 (5054 participants). The risk of bias was high or unclear across most studies, with a low risk of bias for sequence generation (12), allocation concealment (12), blinding (11) and selective outcome reporting (9) in fewer studies. There is high-certainty evidence that prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment is more effective in preventing CMV disease (19 studies: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), all-cause death (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92), and CMV infection (17 studies: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). There is moderate-certainty evidence that prophylaxis probably reduces death from CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduces the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but probably makes little to no difference to fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. No apparent differences in adverse events with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment were found. There is high certainty evidence that ganciclovir, when compared with aciclovir, is more effective in preventing CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). There may be little to no difference in any outcome between valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir (low certainty evidence). The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir or ganciclovir were probably no different to valaciclovir in three studies (moderate certainty evidence). There is moderate certainty evidence that extended duration prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with three months of therapy (2 studies: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35), with probably little to no difference in rates of adverse events. Low certainty evidence suggests that 450 mg/day valganciclovir compared with 900 mg/day valganciclovir results in little to no difference in all-cause death, CMV infection, acute rejection, and graft loss (no information on adverse events). Maribavir may increase CMV infection compared with ganciclovir (1 study: RR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65; moderate certainty evidence); however, little to no difference between the two treatments were found for CMV disease, all-cause death, acute rejection, and adverse events at six months (low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated death, compared with placebo or no treatment, in solid organ transplant recipients. These data support the continued routine use of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-positive recipients and CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organ transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Wm Vernooij
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Mini Michael
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maleeka Ladhani
- Nephrology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Australia
| | - Angela C Webster
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Medicine, Westmead Millennium Institute, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Giovanni Fm Strippoli
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Elisabeth M Hodson
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klein Nulend R, Singla A, De Silva R, Renthawa J, Yuen L, Laurence JM, Lee T, Pleass H. A First Case Report of Cytomegalovirus Infection Presenting With Perianal Fistula and Abscess Formation in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2022; 20:771-775. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.2022.0190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
4
|
Scarpini S, Morigi F, Betti L, Dondi A, Biagi C, Lanari M. Development of a Vaccine against Human Cytomegalovirus: Advances, Barriers, and Implications for the Clinical Practice. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:551. [PMID: 34070277 PMCID: PMC8225126 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9060551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) is one of the most common causes of congenital infection in the post-rubella era, representing a major public health concern. Although most cases are asymptomatic in the neonatal period, congenital CMV (cCMV) disease can result in permanent impairment of cognitive development and represents the leading cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss. Moreover, even if hCMV mostly causes asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic infections in immunocompetent hosts, it may lead to severe and life-threatening disease in immunocompromised patients. Since immunity reduces the severity of disease, in the last years, the development of an effective and safe hCMV vaccine has been of great interest to pharmacologic researchers. Both hCMV live vaccines-e.g., live-attenuated, chimeric, viral-based-and non-living ones-subunit, RNA-based, virus-like particles, plasmid-based DNA-have been investigated. Encouraging data are emerging from clinical trials, but a hCMV vaccine has not been licensed yet. Major difficulties in the development of a satisfactory vaccine include hCMV's capacity to evade the immune response, unclear immune correlates for protection, low number of available animal models, and insufficient general awareness. Moreover, there is a need to determine which may be the best target populations for vaccine administration. The aim of the present paper is to examine the status of hCMV vaccines undergoing clinical trials and understand barriers limiting their development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Scarpini
- Specialty School of Pediatrics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (F.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Francesca Morigi
- Specialty School of Pediatrics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (F.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Ludovica Betti
- Specialty School of Pediatrics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy; (S.S.); (F.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Arianna Dondi
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.B.); (M.L.)
| | - Carlotta Biagi
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.B.); (M.L.)
| | - Marcello Lanari
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.B.); (M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yaiw KC, Mohammad AA, Taher C, Cui HL, Costa H, Kostopoulou ON, Jung M, Assinger A, Wilhelmi V, Yang J, Strååt K, Rahbar A, Pernow J, Söderberg-Nauclér C. Human Cytomegalovirus Reduces Endothelin-1 Expression in Both Endothelial and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9061137. [PMID: 34070407 PMCID: PMC8229579 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9061137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is an opportunistic pathogen that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictive peptide, is overexpressed and strongly associated with many vasculopathies. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether HCMV could affect ET-1 production. As such, both endothelial and smooth muscle cells, two primary cell types involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, were infected with HCMV in vitro and ET-1 mRNA and proteins were assessed by quantitative PCR assay, immunofluorescence staining and ELISA. HCMV infection significantly decreased ET-1 mRNA and secreted bioactive ET-1 levels from both cell types and promoted accumulation of the ET-1 precursor protein in infected endothelial cells. This was associated with inhibition of expression of the endothelin converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1), which cleaves the ET-1 precursor protein to mature ET-1. Ganciclovir treatment did not prevent the virus suppressive effects on ET-1 expression. Consistent with this observation we identified that the IE2-p86 protein predominantly modulated ET-1 expression. Whether the pronounced effects of HCMV in reducing ET-1 expression in vitro may lead to consequences for regulation of the vascular tone in vivo remains to be proven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koon-Chu Yaiw
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: (K.-C.Y.); (C.S.-N.)
| | - Abdul-Aleem Mohammad
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chato Taher
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Huanhuan Leah Cui
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Costa
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ourania N. Kostopoulou
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Masany Jung
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alice Assinger
- Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Vanessa Wilhelmi
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiangning Yang
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital Solna, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (J.Y.); (J.P.)
| | - Klas Strååt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, BioClinicum and Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University, Hospital Solna and Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Afsar Rahbar
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John Pernow
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital Solna, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (J.Y.); (J.P.)
| | - Cecilia Söderberg-Nauclér
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Microbial Pathogenesis Unit, Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden; (A.-A.M.); (C.T.); (H.L.C.); (H.C.); (M.J.); (V.W.); (A.R.)
- Division of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE 171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: (K.-C.Y.); (C.S.-N.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Utility of CMV-Specific Immune Monitoring for the Management of CMV in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Clinical Update. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11050875. [PMID: 34068377 PMCID: PMC8153332 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most important opportunistic infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, current techniques used to predict risk for CMV infection fall short. CMV-specific cell mediated immunity (CMI) plays an important role in protecting against CMV infection. There is evidence that assays measuring CMV-CMI might better identify SOT recipients at risk of complications from CMV compared to anti-CMV IgG, which is our current standard of care. Here, we review recently published studies that utilize CMV-CMI, at various points before and after transplantation, to help predict risk and guide the management of CMV infection following organ transplantation. The evidence supports the use of these novel assays to help identify SOT recipients at increased risk and highlights the need for larger prospective trials evaluating these modalities in this high-risk population.
Collapse
|
7
|
Griffiths P, Reeves M. Pathogenesis of human cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021; 19:759-773. [PMID: 34168328 PMCID: PMC8223196 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-021-00582-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a herpesvirus that infects ~60% of adults in developed countries and more than 90% in developing countries. Usually, it is controlled by a vigorous immune response so that infections are asymptomatic or symptoms are mild. However, if the immune system is compromised, HCMV can replicate to high levels and cause serious end organ disease. Substantial progress is being made in understanding the natural history and pathogenesis of HCMV infection and disease in the immunocompromised host. Serial measures of viral load defined the dynamics of HCMV replication and are now used routinely to allow intervention with antiviral drugs in individual patients. They are also used as pharmacodynamic read-outs to evaluate prototype vaccines that may protect against HCMV replication and to define immune correlates of this protection. This novel information is informing the design of randomized controlled trials of new antiviral drugs and vaccines currently under evaluation. In this Review, we discuss immune responses to HCMV and countermeasures deployed by the virus, the establishment of latency and reactivation from it, exogenous reinfection with additional strains, pathogenesis, development of end organ disease, indirect effects of infection, immune correlates of control of replication, current treatment strategies and the evaluation of novel vaccine candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Griffiths
- Institute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Matthew Reeves
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201Institute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jehn U, Schütte-Nütgen K, Bautz J, Pavenstädt H, Suwelack B, Thölking G, Heinzow H, Reuter S. Cytomegalovirus Viremia after Living and Deceased Donation in Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9010252. [PMID: 31963515 PMCID: PMC7019428 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite screening, effective anti-viral drugs and risk-balanced prophylaxis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity in transplant patients. The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the risk factors associated with CMV viremia after kidney transplantation in a large European cohort with standardized valganciclovir prophylaxis in the present era. A special focus was placed on the comparison of living and postmortal donation. We conducted a longitudinal observational study involving 723 adult patients with a total of 3292 patient-years who were transplanted at our center between 2007 and 2015. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was administered over 100 days for CMV+ donors (D) or recipients (R), over 200 days for D+/R−, and none in D−/R−. A CMV+ donor, rejection episodes, and deceased donor transplantation were identified to be associated with increased incidences of CMV viremia. Although we did not find a reduced overall survival rate for patients with CMV viremia, it was associated with worse graft function. Since we observed a relevant number of CMV infections despite prescribing valganciclovir prophylaxis, a pre-emptive strategy in patients with (suspected) adherence restrictions could be favored. Our data can help transplant physicians educate their patients about their individual CMV risk and choose the most appropriate CMV treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Jehn
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Katharina Schütte-Nütgen
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Joachim Bautz
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Hermann Pavenstädt
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Gerold Thölking
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
| | - Hauke Heinzow
- Department of Medicine B, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (U.J.); (K.S.-N.); (J.B.); (H.P.); (B.S.); (G.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-251-83-47540; Fax: +49-251-83-56973
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Transplant recipients are at risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and associated morbidity and mortality. We summarize recently introduced or currently investigated modalities for prevention and treatment of CMV infection in hematopoietic cell (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. RECENT FINDINGS Letermovir was recently approved for CMV prevention in HCT recipients. Data from real world studies support its role to improve outcomes in this population. Letermovir is currently under investigation for broader patient populations and indications. Maribavir is in late stages of development for CMV treatment and may provide a safer alternative to currently available anti-CMV drugs. Promising CMV vaccine candidates and adoptive cell therapy approaches are under evaluation. CMV immune monitoring assays are predicted to play a more central role in our clinical decision making. In recent years, major advances have been made in CMV prevention and treatment in transplant recipients. Rigorous research is ongoing and is anticipated to further impact our ability to improve outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat Stern
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY1250 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Genovefa A Papanicolaou
- Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY1250 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chan S, Isbel NM, Hawley CM, Campbell SB, Campbell KL, Morrison M, Francis RS, Playford EG, Johnson DW. Infectious Complications Following Kidney Transplantation-A Focus on Hepatitis C Infection, Cytomegalovirus Infection and Novel Developments in the Gut Microbiota. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 55:medicina55100672. [PMID: 31590269 PMCID: PMC6843315 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55100672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of infectious complications, compared with the general population and the pre-transplant status of the recipient, increases substantially following kidney transplantation, causing significant morbidity and mortality. The potent immunosuppressive therapy given to prevent graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients results in an increased susceptibility to a wide range of opportunistic infections including bacterial, viral and fungal infections. Over the last five years, several advances have occurred that may have changed the burden of infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the availability of direct-acting antivirals to manage donor-derived hepatitis C infection, this has opened the way for donors with hepatitis C infection to be considered in the donation process. In addition, there have been the development of medications targeting the growing burden of resistant cytomegalovirus, as well as the discovery of the potentially important role of the gastrointestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of post-transplant infection. In this narrative review, we will discuss these three advances and their potential implications for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Chan
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (N.M.I.); (C.M.H.); (S.B.C.); (R.S.F.); (D.W.J.)
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-7-3176-5080
| | - Nicole M Isbel
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (N.M.I.); (C.M.H.); (S.B.C.); (R.S.F.); (D.W.J.)
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (N.M.I.); (C.M.H.); (S.B.C.); (R.S.F.); (D.W.J.)
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
| | - Scott B Campbell
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (N.M.I.); (C.M.H.); (S.B.C.); (R.S.F.); (D.W.J.)
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Katrina L Campbell
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Research Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Mark Morrison
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia;
| | - Ross S Francis
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (N.M.I.); (C.M.H.); (S.B.C.); (R.S.F.); (D.W.J.)
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - E Geoffrey Playford
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Infection Management Services, Department of Microbiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (N.M.I.); (C.M.H.); (S.B.C.); (R.S.F.); (D.W.J.)
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia; (K.L.C.); (E.G.P.)
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rauber C, Bartelheimer K, Zhou T, Rupp C, Schnitzler P, Schemmer P, Sauer P, Weiss KH, Gotthardt DN. Prevalence of human herpesviruses in biliary fluid and their association with biliary complications after liver transplantation. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:110. [PMID: 31248389 PMCID: PMC6598275 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1033-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Beta-herpesviruses are common opportunistic pathogens that cause morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Methods Objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and correlation of herpesviruses in bile, blood and liver tissue and to investigate their association with biliary complications and retransplantation (re-LT) free survival after LT. The study design is a single-center case-control study. We performed quantative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for herpesvirus 1–8 DNA in bile, blood and liver tissue of 73 patients after first LT and analyzed their clinical courses retrospectively. Results The median follow-up was 48 months (range 2–102), during which a total of 16 patients underwent re-LT and 11 patients died. Of the patients, 46.5% received valganciclovir prophylaxis at the time of bile sample acquisition. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (18.3%), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) (34.2%), human herpesvirus 7 (HHV-7) (20.5%) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (16.4%) were highly prevalent in bile after LT, while herpes simpex virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1, HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) were not or rarely detected in bile. Valganciclovir prophylaxis did not reduce the prevalence of HHV-6 and HHV-7 in bile, but it did reduce the presence of CMV and EBV. The presence of HHV-6 in bile was associated with non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) and acute cellular rejection (ACR). Conclusions CMV, EBV, HHV-6 and HHV-7 are more prevalent in biliary fluid than in liver biopsy or blood serum after LT. HHV-6 and HHV-7 might be associated with biliary complications after LT. Biliary fluids might be an attractive target for routine herpesvirus detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad Rauber
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. .,INSERM U1015, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France.
| | - Katja Bartelheimer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Taotao Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rupp
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Schnitzler
- Department of Virology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Sauer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karl Heinz Weiss
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Nils Gotthardt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
El Helou G, Razonable RR. Letermovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients: an evidence-based review. Infect Drug Resist 2019; 12:1481-1491. [PMID: 31239725 PMCID: PMC6556539 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s180908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading opportunistic infection in immune compromised patients, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, where primary infection or reactivation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral drugs are the mainstay for the prevention of CMV infection and disease, most commonly with valganciclovir. However, valganciclovir use is often associated with adverse drug reactions, most notably leukopenia and neutropenia, and its widespread use has led to emergence of antiviral resistance. Foscarnet and cidofovir, however, are associated with nephrotoxicity. Letermovir, a novel CMV viral terminase inhibitor drug, was recently approved for CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT recipients. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence supporting the use of letermovir in allogeneic HSCT recipients, and how the drug impacts our contemporary clinical practice. In addition, we discuss the ongoing clinical trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV in SOT recipients. The use of letermovir for treatment of CMV infection and disease is not yet approved. However, because of a unique mechanism of activity, we provide our perspective on the potential role of letermovir in the treatment of ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and disease. Furthermore, drug-resistant CMV has emerged during use of letermovir for prophylaxis and treatment. Caution is advised on its use in order to preserve its therapeutic lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy El Helou
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meesing A, Razonable RR. New Developments in the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection After Transplantation. Drugs 2019; 78:1085-1103. [PMID: 29961185 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-018-0943-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be one of the most important pathogens that universally affect solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Lack of effective CMV-specific immunity is the common factor that predisposes to the risk of CMV reactivation and clinical disease after transplantation. Antiviral drugs are the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of CMV infection and disease. Over the years, the CMV DNA polymerase inhibitor, ganciclovir (and valganciclovir), have served as the backbone for management, while foscarnet and cidofovir are reserved for the management of CMV infection that is refractory or resistant to ganciclovir treatment. In this review, we highlight the role of the newly approved drug, letermovir, a viral terminase inhibitor, for CMV prevention after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Advances in immunologic monitoring may allow for an individualized approach to management of CMV after transplantation. Specifically, the potential role of CMV-specific T-cell measurements in guiding the need for the treatment of asymptomatic CMV infection and the duration of treatment of CMV disease is discussed. The role of adoptive immunotherapy, using ex vivo-generated CMV-specific T cells, is highlighted. This article provides a review of novel drugs, tests, and strategies in optimizing our current approaches to prevention and treatment of CMV in transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atibordee Meesing
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Marian Hall 5, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Marian Hall 5, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
- William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Choo HMC, Cher WQ, Kwan YH, Fong WWS. Risk factors for cytomegalovirus disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a systematic review. Adv Rheumatol 2019; 59:12. [PMID: 30885265 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-019-0055-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic pathogen causing reactivation and disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients. This study aims to systematically review the literature for risk factors associated with CMV disease in SLE patients, in order to identify those more susceptible to CMV infection during their treatment. METHODS A systematic review was conducted on 4 different search engines and via hand search until May 2017. Studies were included after quality assessment via the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (HTA KMET). RESULTS Two studies on CMV disease were included. Elevated CMV viral load, higher steroid doses, use of immunosuppressants and disease duration were the most commonly associated risk factors for CMV disease. CONCLUSION High CMV viral loads, longer SLE disease duration and higher steroid doses were associated with CMV disease. Further studies studying the risk of treatment drugs and role of interventions in the development of CMV infection are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Min Charlotte Choo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia Building, Level 4, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| | - Wen Qi Cher
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Heng Kwan
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Warren Weng Seng Fong
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lumley S, Green C, Rafferty H, Smith C, Harber M, O’Beirne J, Jones G, Thorburn D, Marshall A, Shah T, Zuhair M, Rothwell E, Atabani S, Haque T, Griffiths P. Cytomegalovirus viral load parameters associated with earlier initiation of pre-emptive therapy after solid organ transplantation. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0210420. [PMID: 30682032 PMCID: PMC6347177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can be managed by monitoring HCMV DNA in the blood and giving valganciclovir when viral load exceeds a defined value. We hypothesised that such pre-emptive therapy should occur earlier than the standard 3000 genomes/ml (2520 IU/ml) when a seropositive donor transmitted virus to a seronegative recipient (D+R-) following solid organ transplantation (SOT). METHODS Our local protocol was changed so that D+R- SOT patients commenced valganciclovir once the viral load exceeded 200 genomes/ml; 168 IU/ml (new protocol). The decision point remained at 3000 genomes/ml (old protocol) for the other two patient subgroups (D+R+, D-R+). Virological outcomes were assessed three years later, when 74 D+R- patients treated under the old protocol could be compared with 67 treated afterwards. The primary outcomes were changes in peak viral load, duration of viraemia and duration of treatment in the D+R- group. The secondary outcome was the proportion of D+R- patients who developed subsequent viraemia episodes. FINDINGS In the D+R- patients, the median values of peak viral load (30,774 to 11,135 genomes/ml, p<0.0215) were significantly reduced on the new protocol compared to the old, but the duration of viraemia and duration of treatment were not. Early treatment increased subsequent episodes of viraemia from 33/58 (57%) to 36/49 (73%) of patients (p< 0.0743) with a significant increase (p = 0.0072) in those episodes that required treatment (16/58; 27% versus 26/49; 53%). Median peak viral load increased significantly (2,103 to 3,934 genomes/ml, p<0.0249) in the D+R+ but not in the D-R+ patient subgroups. There was no change in duration of viraemia or duration of treatment for any patient subgroup. INTERPRETATION Pre-emptive therapy initiated at the first sign of viraemia post-transplant significantly reduced the peak viral load but increased later episodes of viraemia, consistent with the hypothesis of reduced antigenic stimulation of the immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Lumley
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cameron Green
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Rafferty
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Colette Smith
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Harber
- Renal Transplant Unit Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - James O’Beirne
- The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Jones
- Renal Transplant Unit Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas Thorburn
- The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aileen Marshall
- The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tina Shah
- The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Zuhair
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Rothwell
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sowsan Atabani
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tanzina Haque
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Griffiths
- Centre for Virology University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li X, Huang Y, Xu Z, Zhang R, Liu X, Li Y, Mao P. Cytomegalovirus infection and outcome in immunocompetent patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18:289. [PMID: 29954328 PMCID: PMC6027797 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3195-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in immunocompetent patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, whether CMV infection or CMV reactivation contributes to mortality of immunocompetent patients remains unclear. METHODS A literature search was conducted for relevant studies published before May 30, 2016. Studies reporting on CMV infection in immunocompetent patients in ICUs and containing 2 × 2 tables on CMV results and all-cause mortality were included. RESULTS Eighteen studies involving 2398 immunocompetent patients admitted to ICUs were included in the meta-analysis. The overall rate of CMV infection was 27% (95%CI 22-34%, I2 = 89%, n = 2398) and the CMV reactivation was 31% (95%CI 24-39%, I2 = 74%, n = 666). The odds ratio (OR) for all-cause mortality among patients with CMV infection, compared with those without infection, was 2.16 (95%CI 1.70-2.74, I2 = 10%, n = 2239). Moreover, upon exclusion of studies in which antiviral treatment was possibly or definitely provided to some patients, the association of mortality rate with CMV infection was also statistically significant (OR: 1.69, 95%CI 1.01-2.83, I2 = 37%, n = 912,). For CMV seropositive patients, the OR for mortality in patients with CMV reactivation as compared with patients without CMV reactivation was 1.72 (95%CI 1.04-2.85, I2 = 29%, n = 664). Patients with CMV infection required significantly longer mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD): 9 days (95% CI 5-14, I2 = 81%, n = 875)) and longer duration of ICU stay (MD: 12 days (95% CI 7-17, I2 = 70%, n = 949)) than patients without CMV infection. When analysis was limited to detection in blood, CMV infection without antiviral drug treatment or reactivation was not significantly associated with higher mortality (OR: 1.69, 95%CI 0.81-3.54, I2 = 52%, n = 722; OR: 1.49, I2 = 63%, n = 469). CONCLUSION Critically ill patients without immunosuppression admitted to ICUs show a high rate of CMV infection. CMV infection during the natural unaltered course or reactivation in critically ill patients is associated with increased mortality, but have no effect on mortality when CMV in blood. More studies are needed to clarify the impact of CMV infection on clinical outcomes in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China.,Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongbo Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China.,Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiheng Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China.,Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Rong Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China.,Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoqing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China.,Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yimin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China. .,Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Pu Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Medical University), Guangzhou, China. .,Department of Infection Control, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Czarnecka P, Czarnecka K, Tronina O, Durlik M. Cytomegalovirus Disease After Liver Transplant-A Description of a Treatment-Resistant Case: A Case Report and Literature Review. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:4015-4022. [PMID: 30577306 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication in solid organ transplant recipients. In patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment, CMV may lead to life-threatening organ complications or graft loss. We describe a case of 31-year-old CMV-seronegative patient who underwent liver transplant from a CMV-seropositive donor with an early acute resistant rejection of the transplanted organ followed by primary CMV infection, despite prophylaxis, and its severe organ complications. Routine treatment of acute allograft rejection through increasing the base immunosuppression and then administering methylprednisolone infusions did not yield significant therapeutic effect. This resulted in anti-thymocyte globulin and ultimately proteasome inhibitor introduction. The cholestasis remitted and liver parameters improved. But 4 weeks later the patient was admitted again due to incorrect liver function tests. Blood tests revealed high CMV viral load, and primary CMV infection was diagnosed. On diagnosis the patient was treated with ganciclovir (GCV) intravenously. As GCV resistance was suspected based on clinical premises, foscarnet (FOS) and leflunomide (LFM) were implemented with concomitant cautious immunosuppression reduction due to the history of recent graft rejection. Despite aggressive treatment introduction, viral clearance was not obtained. Ultimately the patient died due to respiratory distress resulting from lung fibrosis, most probably owing to CMV diseases with Pneumocystis jiroveci coinfection. The presented case proves the importance of strictly following the rules of prophylaxis, especially in patients with a high risk factor of CMV infection development. A quick diagnosis, implementation of appropriate treatment, and fast reaction to the lack of satisfying therapeutic effect can be the key to a successful treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Czarnecka
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - K Czarnecka
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - O Tronina
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Durlik
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology, and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lodding IP, da Cunha Bang C, Sørensen SS, Gustafsson F, Iversen M, Kirkby N, Perch M, Rasmussen A, Sengeløv H, Mocroft A, Lundgren JD. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease Despite Weekly Preemptive CMV Strategy for Recipients of Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5:ofy080. [PMID: 29876364 PMCID: PMC5961206 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transplant recipients presenting with cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease at the time of diagnosis of CMV DNAemia pose a challenge to a preemptive CMV management strategy. However, the rate and risk factors of such failure remain uncertain. Methods Solid organ transplantation (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients with a first episode of CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNAemia within the first year posttransplantation were evaluated (n = 335). Patient records were reviewed for presence of CMV disease at the time of CMV DNAemia diagnosis. The distribution and prevalence of CMV disease were estimated, and the odds ratio (OR) of CMV disease was modeled using logistic regression. Results The prevalence of CMV disease increased for both SOT and HSCT with increasing diagnostic CMV PCR load and with screening intervals >14 days. The only independent risk factor in multivariate analysis was increasing CMV DNAemia load of the diagnostic CMV PCR (OR = 6.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.09–18.11). Among recipients receiving weekly screening (n = 147), 16 (10.8%) had CMV disease at the time of diagnosis of CMV DNAemia (median DNAemia load 628 IU/mL; interquartile range, 432–1274); 93.8% of these cases were HSCT and lung transplant recipients. Conclusions Despite application of weekly screening intervals, HSCT and lung transplant recipients in particular presented with CMV disease at the time of diagnosis of CMV DNAemia. Additional research to improve the management of patients at risk of presenting with CMV disease at low levels of CMV DNAemia and despite weekly screening is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I P Lodding
- Centre for Health, Immunity and Infectious Diseases (CHIP), Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C da Cunha Bang
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S S Sørensen
- Department of Nephrology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Iversen
- Department of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - N Kirkby
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Perch
- Department of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Rasmussen
- Abdominal Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - H Sengeløv
- Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Mocroft
- Institute for Global Health, Infection and Population Health, University College of London, United Kingdom
| | - J D Lundgren
- Centre for Health, Immunity and Infectious Diseases (CHIP), Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ramirez CGB, McCauley J. Infection in Kidney Transplantation. CONTEMPORARY KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION 2018. [PMCID: PMC7123753 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19617-6_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. It has been estimated that 70% of kidney transplant recipients will experience an infection episode within the first 3 years after transplantation (Dharnidharka et al. 2007). After cardiovascular disease, infection is the second leading cause of death in recipients with allograft function (Snyder et al. 2009). The immunosuppressive therapy required to prevent organ rejection places the kidney transplant recipient at increased risk for donor-derived, nosocomial, and community-acquired infections as well as reactivation of latent pathogens. Pretransplant screening, immunizations, and optimal antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis can help to reduce the impact of infection. Awareness of the approach to infection in the transplant recipient including diagnostic and management strategies is essential to optimizing outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Gerardo B. Ramirez
- Transplant Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA
| | - Jerry McCauley
- Division of Nephrology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
López-Oliva MO, Flores J, Madero R, Escuin F, Santana MJ, Bellón T, Selgas R, Jiménez C. La infección por citomegalovirus postrasplante renal y pérdida del injerto a largo plazo. Nefrologia 2017; 37:515-525. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 10/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
|
21
|
Hellemans R, Bosmans J, Abramowicz D. Induction Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Do We Still Need Anti-IL2 Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies? Am J Transplant 2017; 17:22-27. [PMID: 27223882 PMCID: PMC5215533 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2015] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Induction therapy with antilymphocyte biological agents is widely used after kidney transplantation, most commonly T lymphocyte-depleting rabbit-derived antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or an IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA). Early randomized trials showed that rATG or IL2RA induction reduces early acute rejection, prompting recommendations by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes that IL2RA induction be used routinely in first-line therapy after kidney transplantation, with lymphocyte-depleting induction reserved for high-risk cases. These studies, however, mainly used outdated maintenance regimens. No large randomized trial has examined the effect of IL2RA or rATG induction versus no induction in patients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and steroids. With this triple maintenance therapy, the addition of induction may achieve an absolute risk reduction for acute rejection of only 1-4% in standard-risk patients without improving graft or patient survival. In contrast, rATG induction lowers the relative risk of acute rejection by almost 50% versus IL2RA in patients with high immunological risk. These recent data raise questions about the need for IL2RA in kidney transplantation, as it may no longer be beneficial in standard-risk transplantation and may be inferior to rATG in high-risk situations. Updated evidence-based guidelines are necessary to support clinicians deciding whether and what induction therapy is required for their transplant patients today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Hellemans
- Dienst NefrologieUniversitair Ziekenhuis AntwerpenEdegemBelgium
| | - J.‐L. Bosmans
- Dienst NefrologieUniversitair Ziekenhuis AntwerpenEdegemBelgium
| | - D. Abramowicz
- Dienst NefrologieUniversitair Ziekenhuis AntwerpenEdegemBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Current Perspectives on Cytomegalovirus in Heart Transplantation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-016-0121-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
23
|
Torre-Cisneros J, Aguado J, Caston J, Almenar L, Alonso A, Cantisán S, Carratalá J, Cervera C, Cordero E, Fariñas M, Fernández-Ruiz M, Fortún J, Frauca E, Gavaldá J, Hernández D, Herrero I, Len O, Lopez-Medrano F, Manito N, Marcos M, Martín-Dávila P, Monforte V, Montejo M, Moreno A, Muñoz P, Navarro D, Pérez-Romero P, Rodriguez-Bernot A, Rumbao J, San Juan R, Vaquero J, Vidal E. Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2016; 30:119-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Revised: 04/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
24
|
Hamouda M, Kahloun R, Jaballah L, Aloui S, Skhiri H, Jelliti B, Khairallah M, Elmay M. Cytomegalovirus Ocular Involvement in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2016; 16:495-498. [PMID: 27363821 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2016.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus remains the most common infection after kidney transplant. We report cytomegalovirus retinitis and anterior uveitis, which developed consecutively within 1 year in a kidney transplant recipient. A 25-year-old man presented 5 months after transplant with decreased visual acuity in his left eye. Fundus examination revealed bilateral areas of necrotizing retinitis with intraretinal hemorrhages. The confirmation of cytomegalovirus disease was based on clinical findings and positive polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus in plasma and in aqueous humor. The patient was treated with intravenous ganciclovir for 21 days and then with valacyclovir for 3 months. The patient's symptoms improved, and fundus examination revealed resolution of retinitis with appearance of retinal scarring. One year later, the patient presented with cytomegalovirus anterior uveitis associated with increased intraocular pressure, which was treated with antiviral agents, antiglaucomatous eye drops, and trabeculectomy. Cytomegalovirus ocular involvement for our immunocompromised patient presented in 2 consecutive forms: bilateral retinitis and anterior uveitis. Early diagnosis and treatment of active cytomegalovirus retinitis and uveitis remain crucial to prevent their progression to irreversible visual impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouna Hamouda
- From the Department of Nephrology, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, and the University Faculty of Medicine, Monastir, Tunisia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Simon P, Sasse M, Laudi S, Petroff D, Bartels M, Kaisers UX, Bercker S. Two strategies for prevention of cytomegalovirus infections after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:3412-3417. [PMID: 27022223 PMCID: PMC4806199 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2015] [Revised: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To analyze differences in patients’ clinical course, we compared two regimes of either preemptive therapy or prophylaxis after liver transplantation.
METHODS: This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the University of Leipzig. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with valganciclovir hydrochloride for liver transplant recipients was replaced by a preemptive strategy in October 2009. We retrospectively compared liver transplant recipients 2 years before and after October 2009. During the first period, all patients received valganciclovir daily. During the second period all patients included in the analysis were treated following a preemptive strategy. Outcomes included one year survival and therapeutic intervention due to CMV viremia or infection.
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2010 n = 226 patients underwent liver transplantation in our center. n = 55 patients were D+/R- high risk recipients and were excluded from further analysis. A further 43 patients had to be excluded since CMV prophylaxis/preemptive strategy was not followed although there was no clinical reason for the deviation. Of the remaining 128 patients whose data were analyzed, 60 received prophylaxis and 68 were treated following a preemptive strategy. The difference in overall mortality was not significant, nor was it significant for one-year mortality where it was 10% (95%CI: 8%-28%, P = 0.31) higher for the preemptive group. No significant differences in blood count abnormalities or the incidence of sepsis and infections were observed other than CMV. In total, 19 patients (14.7%) received ganciclovir due to CMV viremia and/or infections. Patients who were treated according to the preemptive algorithm had a significantly higher rate risk of therapeutic intervention with ganciclovir [n = 16 (23.5%) vs n = 3 (4.9%), P = 0.003)].
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that CMV prophylaxis is superior to a preemptive strategy in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
26
|
Tsai KC, Danziger-Isakov LA, Banach DB. Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: a Focus on Prevention. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2016; 18:5. [DOI: 10.1007/s11908-015-0511-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
27
|
Martin-Gandul C, Mueller NJ, Pascual M, Manuel O. The Impact of Infection on Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Allograft Survival After Solid Organ Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:3024-40. [PMID: 26474168 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Infectious diseases after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are a significant cause of morbidity and reduced allograft and patient survival; however, the influence of infection on the development of chronic allograft dysfunction has not been completely delineated. Some viral infections appear to affect allograft function by both inducing direct tissue damage and immunologically related injury, including acute rejection. In particular, this has been observed for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in all SOT recipients and for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients, for community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients, and for hepatitis C virus in liver transplant recipients. The impact of bacterial and fungal infections is less clear, but bacterial urinary tract infections and respiratory tract colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus spp appear to be correlated with higher rates of chronic allograft dysfunction in kidney and lung transplant recipients, respectively. Evidence supports the beneficial effects of the use of antiviral prophylaxis for CMV in improving allograft function and survival in SOT recipients. Nevertheless, there is still a need for prospective interventional trials assessing the potential effects of preventive and therapeutic strategies against bacterial and fungal infection for reducing or delaying the development of chronic allograft dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Martin-Gandul
- Transplantation Center, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Infectious Diseases Service, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N J Mueller
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Pascual
- Transplantation Center, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - O Manuel
- Transplantation Center, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Infectious Diseases Service, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative bloodstream infection (BSI) is the most important determinant of recipient morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Children who underwent LT are at the highest risk of developing BSI because of the significant surgical intervention, use of multiple devices, and administration of immunosuppressive agents. However, information regarding the risk factors for BSI in children after LT is limited. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 210 children who underwent living-donor LT at the largest pediatric LT center in Japan. Patients' characteristics, blood culture results and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for BSI. RESULTS Among the 210 LT recipients, 53 (25%) recipients experienced 86 episodes of BSI during the observational period. The source of the BSI was identified only in 38%: catheter-related BSI (27%) peritonitis (7%), urinary tract infection (2%), pneumonia (1%) and infectious endocarditis (1%). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that body weight (P = 0.03), volume of blood loss during LT (P < 0.001) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia positivity (P = 0.04) were independently associated with the development of BSI. The risk factors for BSI differed when we analyzed the subjects according to age (≤24 months and >24 months), blood loss and pediatric end-stage liver disease/model for end-stage liver disease versus positive CMV antigenemia. CONCLUSIONS The volume of blood loss, postoperative CMV antigenemia positivity and body weight were associated with the development of BSI after LT in pediatric living-donor recipients. To identify the age-specific predictors of BSI in children who underwent LT, age-specific analyses are crucial.
Collapse
|
29
|
Griffiths P, Baraniak I, Reeves M. The pathogenesis of human cytomegalovirus. J Pathol 2015; 235:288-97. [PMID: 25205255 DOI: 10.1002/path.4437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 375] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2014] [Revised: 09/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a recognized cause of disease in the fetus, the allograft recipient and AIDS patients. More recently, it has been recognized as a pathogen for those admitted to intensive care units, for the elderly and for the general population. The epidemiology and molecular and cellular pathology of this virus are summarized to provide an overarching model of pathogenesis, able to account for these varying clinical presentations. In brief, HCMV has the potential to spread in the bloodstream to all organs, but only produces overt disease if the viral load increases to high levels. This is normally prevented by a robust immune response, so that the infected individual usually remains asymptomatic. However, this benefit comes at the cost of committing more and more immunological resources to controlling HCMV with time, so that the overall function of the immune system is impaired. Fortunately, recent progress in developing novel antiviral drugs and vaccines suggests the possibility that the diverse effects of HCMV may soon become controllable at the individual and population level, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Griffiths
- Centre for Virology, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Ramanan P, Razonable RR. Cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ transplantation: a review. Infect Chemother 2013; 45:260-71. [PMID: 24396627 PMCID: PMC3848521 DOI: 10.3947/ic.2013.45.3.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a tremendous impact in solid organ transplantation despite remarkable advances in its diagnosis, prevention and treatment. It can affect allograft function and increase patient morbidity and mortality through a number of direct and indirect effects. Patients may develop asymptomatic viremia, CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive disease. Late-onset CMV disease continues to be a major problem in high-risk patients after completion of antiviral prophylaxis. Emerging data suggests that immunologic monitoring may be useful in predicting the risk of late onset CMV disease. There is now increasing interest in the development of an effective vaccine for prevention. Novel antiviral drugs with unique mechanisms of action and lesser toxicity are being developed. Viral load quantification is now undergoing standardization, and this will permit the generation of clinically relevant viral thresholds for the management of patients. This article provides a brief overview of the contemporary epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poornima Ramanan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Detection of cytomegalovirus drug resistance mutations by next-generation sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:3700-10. [PMID: 23985916 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01605-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Antiviral therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) plays an important role in the clinical management of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. However, CMV antiviral therapy can be complicated by drug resistance associated with mutations in the phosphotransferase UL97 and the DNA polymerase UL54. We have developed an amplicon-based high-throughput sequencing strategy for detecting CMV drug resistance mutations in clinical plasma specimens using a microfluidics PCR platform for multiplexed library preparation and a benchtop next-generation sequencing instrument. Plasmid clones of the UL97 and UL54 genes were used to demonstrate the low overall empirical error rate of the assay (0.189%) and to develop a statistical algorithm for identifying authentic low-abundance variants. The ability of the assay to detect resistance mutations was tested with mixes of wild-type and mutant plasmids, as well as clinical CMV isolates and plasma samples that were known to contain mutations that confer resistance. Finally, 48 clinical plasma specimens with a range of viral loads (394 to 2,191,011 copies/ml plasma) were sequenced using multiplexing of up to 24 specimens per run. This led to the identification of seven resistance mutations, three of which were present in <20% of the sequenced population. Thus, this assay offers more sensitive detection of minor variants and a higher multiplexing capacity than current methods for the genotypic detection of CMV drug resistance mutations.
Collapse
|
33
|
Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Nephrology (Carlton) 2013; 18:235-6. [DOI: 10.1111/nep.12019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
34
|
Hodson EM, Ladhani M, Webster AC, Strippoli GFM, Craig JC. Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD003774. [PMID: 23450543 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003774.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis with the aim of preventing the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008. OBJECTIVES To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library to February 2004 for the first version of this review. The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register was searched to February 2007 and to July 2011 for the first and current updates of the review without language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications and comparing different regimens of the same antiviral medications in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) or risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and by mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression were performed using restricted maximum-likelihood to estimate the between study variance. Multivariate meta-regression was performed to investigate whether the results were altered after allowing for differences in drugs used, organ transplanted, and recipient CMV serostatus at the time of transplantation. MAIN RESULTS We identified 37 studies (4342 participants). Risk of bias attributes were poorly performed or reported with low risk of bias reported for sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and selective outcome reporting in 25% or fewer studies.Prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment significantly reduced the risk for CMV disease (19 studies; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), CMV infection (17 studies; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77), and all-cause mortality (17 studies; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92) primarily due to reduced mortality from CMV disease (7 studies; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduced the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but not fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss.Meta-regression showed no significant difference in the relative benefit of treatment (risk of CMV disease or all-cause mortality) by organ transplanted or CMV serostatus; no conclusions were possible for CMV negative recipients of negative organs.Neurological dysfunction was more common with ganciclovir and valaciclovir compared with placebo/no treatment. In direct comparison studies, ganciclovir was more effective than aciclovir in preventing CMV disease (7 studies; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60) and leucopenia was more common with aciclovir. Valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir were as effective as oral ganciclovir. The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir/ganciclovir did not differ from valaciclovir in three small studies. Extended duration prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of CMV disease compared with three months therapy (2 studies; RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35). Leucopenia was more common with extended duration prophylaxis but severe treatment associated adverse effects did not differ between extended and three month durations of treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. These data suggest that antiviral prophylaxis should be used routinely in CMV positive recipients and in CMV negative recipients of CMV positive organ transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth M Hodson
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|