Induction immunosuppression in adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis

Association of donor hepatectomy time with liver transplantation outcomes: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Prolonged donor hepatectomy time may be implicated in early and late complications of liver transplantation.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of donor hepatectomy time on outcomes of liver transplant recipients, mainly early allograft dysfunction.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included brain-dead donors and adult liver graft recipients. Donor-recipient matching was obtained through a crossover list. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded for both donors and recipients. Donor hepatectomy, cold ischemia, and warm ischemia times were recorded. Primary outcome was early allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included need for retransplantation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and patient and graft survival at 12 months.

RESULTS

From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 243 patients underwent a liver transplant from a brain-dead donor. Of these, 57 (25%) developed early allograft dysfunction. The median donor hepatectomy time was 29 (23-40) min. Patients with early allograft dysfunction had a median hepatectomy time of 25 (22-38) min, whereas those without it had a median time of 30 (24-40) min (P = 0.126).

CONCLUSION

Donor hepatectomy time was not associated with early allograft dysfunction, graft survival, or patient survival following liver transplantation.

Randomized controlled trial of sustained release tacrolimus vs twice daily tacrolimus in adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of once-daily tacrolimus (ODT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (BDT) in adult live donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

In this open-labelled randomized trial, 174 adult patients undergoing LDLT were randomized into ODT or BDT, combined with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (steroid-free regimen). Tacrolimus was started at a total dose of 1 mg and the trough level was aimed at 3-7 ng/ml. The primary endpoint was eGFR at 1,3- and 6 months post-transplant, using CKD- EPI equation. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), metabolic complications, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in eGFR between the two groups at 6 months (ODT -96 ± 19, BDT -91 ± 21, p value-0.164). BPAR was comparable (18/84 in ODT, 19/88 in BDT, p value-0.981). For a similar dosage of tacrolimus, the median trough tacrolimus levels attained were significantly lower for ODT than BDT during the first-month post-transplant (p value-0.001). Metabolic complications due to immunosuppression, post-operative bilio-vascular complications and patient survival was similar between the two groups at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily tacrolimus has similar renal safety and efficacy as twice-daily tacrolimus when used in combination with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate in adult LDLT.

Dual-Organ Transplantation: Indications, Evaluation, and Outcomes for Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although heart transplantation is the preferred therapy for appropriate patients with advanced heart failure, the presence of concomitant renal or hepatic dysfunction can pose a barrier to isolated heart transplantation. Because donor organ supply limits the availability of organ transplantation, appropriate allocation of this scarce resource is essential; thus, clear guidance for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation is urgently required. The purposes of this scientific statement are (1) to describe the impact of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction on posttransplantation outcomes; (2) to discuss the assessment of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction; (3) to provide an approach to patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation and posttransplantation management; and (4) to explore the ethics of multiorgan transplantation.

The Risk of Postkidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Choice Differs by Recipient Age

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Among adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients, the risk of post-KT adverse outcomes differs by type of induction immunosuppression. Immune response to induction differs as recipients age; yet, choice of induction is barely tailored by age likely due to a lack of evidence of the risks and benefits.

Methods.

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we identified 39336 first-time KT recipients (2010–2016). We estimated the length of stay (LOS), acute rejection (AR), graft failure, and death by induction type using logistic and Cox regression weighted by propensity score to adjust for confounders. We tested whether these estimates differed by age (65+ versus 18–64 y) using a Wald test.

Results.

Overall, rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) was associated with a decreased risk of AR (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.85) compared with basiliximab. The effect of induction on LOS and death (interaction P = 0.03 and 0.003) differed by recipient age. Discharge was on average 11% shorter in rATG among younger recipients (relative time = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.99) but not among older recipients (relative time = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08). rATG was not associated with mortality among older (hazard ratio = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.15), but among younger recipients (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95), it was associated with reduced mortality risk.

Conclusions.

rATG should be considered to prevent AR, especially among recipients with high-immunologic risk regardless of age; however, choice of induction should be tailored to reduce LOS and risk of mortality, particularly among younger recipients.

Current and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), develops in approximately 50% of patients. The primary treatment is high-dose systemic steroids, but treatment failure is common, and steroid-refractory (SR) GVHD is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality after allogeneic HCT. Ruxolitinib became the first treatment for SR GVHD to obtain US Food and Drug Administration approval, and other new treatments are actively being studied. We searched the literature using the PubMed database and clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov to identify the most promising new treatments for GVHD. In this review, we categorize potential new treatments for GVHD by their mechanism of action (e.g., antibodies that deplete T cells or prevent their trafficking to target tissues, proteasome inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and other agents) and summarize the results from clinical trials.

Mechanisms and clinical applications of immunosuppressive medications

Immunosuppressive medications and regimens have evolved with significant advancements in the understanding of the immunologic process after solid organ transplantation. Medications can block the communication between antigen-presenting cells and T-cells, the activation and proliferation of T-cells, antibody production by plasma cells, and the activation of the complement system by antibodies. T-cell depleting antibodies and interleukin-2 receptor blockers are commonly used during induction therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites, antiproliferative agents, and corticosteroids are commonly used in maintenance therapy regimens. These medications decrease the rates of rejection episodes and markedly increase the survival rates of short-term grafts. However, in terms of the survival rate of long-term grafts, there is still room for improvement. Opportunistic infections, development of cancer, metabolic diseases, and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity are hurdles in the improvement in survival rates of long-term grafts. Therefore, many efforts are being taken to overcome these hurdles, such as the development of new drugs, individualization of immunosuppression, and induction of immune tolerance.