Decreased in vitro interaction between p53 and nuclear stress proteins in the p53-deficient mouse

Effect of p53 genotype on gene expression profiles in murine liver

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a key regulatory element in the cell and is regarded as the "guardian of the genome". Much of the present knowledge of p53 function has come from studies of transgenic mice in which the p53 gene has undergone a targeted deletion. In order to provide additional insight into the impact on the cellular regulatory networks associated with the loss of this gene, microarray technology was utilized to assess gene expression in tissues from both the p53(-/-) and p53(+/-) mice. Six male mice from each genotype (p53(+/+), p53(+/-), and p53(-/-)) were humanely killed and the tissues processed for microarray analysis. The initial studies have been performed in the liver for which the Dunnett test revealed 1406 genes to be differentially expressed between p53(+/+) and p53(+/-) or between p53(+/+) and p53(-/-) at the level of p < or = 0.05. Both genes with increased expression and decreased expression were identified in p53(+/-) and in p53(-/-) mice. Most notable in the gene list derived from the p53(+/-) mice was the significant reduction in p53 mRNA. In the p53(-/-) mice, not only was there reduced expression of the p53 genes on the array, but genes associated with DNA repair, apoptosis, and cell proliferation were differentially expressed, as expected. However, altered expression was noted for many genes in the Cdc42-GTPase pathways that influence cell proliferation. This may indicate that alternate pathways are brought into play in the unperturbed liver when loss or reduction in p53 levels occurs.

Immunohistochemical expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in human brain tumors: relationships of iNOS to superoxide dismutase (SOD) proteins (SOD1 and SOD2), Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1) and p53 protein

In this study, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in a series of 158 human primary brain tumors was analyzed. To gain some insight into the biological significance of iNOS expression in tumor cells, comparative immunohistochemical analyses were employed to characterize the expression of iNOS, superoxide dismutase (SOD) proteins (SOD1 and SOD2), Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1) and p53 protein in these cells. Sixteen (39.0%) of the 41 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) specimens showed iNOS immunoreactivity. Positive immunoreactions with iNOS were also detected in 2/8 anaplastic astrocytomas, 1/17 astrocytomas, 1/14 medulloblastomas and 1/11 primitive neuroectodermal tumors, but no positive reactions were observed in oligodendrogliomas (0/11), ependymomas (0/5), schwannomas (0/21), meningiomas (0/23) or pituitary adenomas (0/7). The MIB-1 labeling index of GBMs that expressed iNOS was significantly higher than that of GBMs that did not (0.025< P <0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Unlike iNOS-negative tumors, all iNOS-positive tumors coexpressed SOD1 or SOD2. In particular, there was a significant correlation between iNOS induction and SOD1 expression (P =1.65x10(-10), Fisher's exact test) in GBM specimens. There was no significant relationship between iNOS and p53 protein in any type of primary brain tumor (P >0.05, Fisher's exact test). No significant immunohistochemical reactions with iNOS, MIB-1 or p53 protein were observed in normal brain tissue sections. We conclude that primary brain tumors express iNOS, and that iNOS expression in brain tumor cells may depend, in part, on cellular proliferation potential. Based on the fact that SOD1 scavenges oxidative-stress species originating from large amounts of nitric oxide (NO) produced by iNOS, iNOS-expressing brain tumor cells may protect themselves against NO cytotoxicity by overinducing SOD1.