1
|
Guo HL, Wu WW, Huan Y, Zhang HW. SGRT-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer setup accuracy and margin of the PTV. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14195. [PMID: 37915300 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT, AlignRT) was used to analyze motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in lung cancer patients and to explore the margin of the planning target volume (PTV). METHODS The residual errors of the AlignRT were evaluated based on grayscale cone-beam computed tomography registration results before each treatment. AlignRT log file was used to analyze the correlation between the frequency and longest duration of errors larger than 2 mm and lasting longer than 2 s and maximum error with age and treatment duration. The displacement value at the end of treatment, the average displacement value, and the 95% probability density displacement interval were defined as intrafraction errors, and PTV1, PTV2, PTV3 were calculated by Van Herk formula or Z score analysis. Organ dosimetric differences were compared after the experience-based margin was replaced with PTV3. RESULTS The interfraction residual errors were Vrt0 , 0.06 ± 0.18 cm; Lng0 , -0.03 ± 0.19 cm; Lat0 , 0.02 ± 0.15 cm; Pitch0 , 0.23 ± 0.7°; Roll0 , 0.1 ± 0.69°; Rtn0 , -0.02 ± 0.79°. The frequency, longest duration and maximum error in vertical direction were correlated with treatment duration (r = 0.404, 0.353, 0.283, p < 0.05, respectively). In the longitudinal direction, the frequency was correlated with age and treatment duration (r = 0.376, 0.283, p < 0.05, respectively), maximum error was correlated with age (r = 0.4, P < 0.05). Vertical, longitudinal, lateral margins of PTV1, PTV2, PTV3 were 2 mm, 4 mm, 2 mm; 2 mm, 2 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 3 mm, respectively. After replacing the original PTV, mean lung dose (MLD), 2-cm3 chest wall dose (CD), lung V20 decreased by 0.2 Gy, 2.1 Gy, 0.5%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION AlignRT can be used for interfraction setup and monitoring intrafraction motion. It is more reasonable to use upper and lower limits of the 95% probability density interval as an intrafraction error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Liang Guo
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Wei-Wei Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Gannan Medical University, GanZhou Cancer Hospital, Ganzhou, China
| | - Yan Huan
- Department of Oncology, People's Hospital of Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Minority Autonomous Prefecture, Qian xinan, China
| | - Huai-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, NHC Key Laboratory of Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Nanchang, China
- Department of Oncology, The Third People's Hospital of Jingdezhen, Jingdezhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Psarras M, Stasinou D, Stroubinis T, Protopapa M, Zygogianni A, Kouloulias V, Platoni K. Surface-Guided Radiotherapy: Can We Move on from the Era of Three-Point Markers to the New Era of Thousands of Points? Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:1202. [PMID: 37892932 PMCID: PMC10604452 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10101202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) technique improves patient positioning with submillimeter accuracy compared with the conventional positioning technique of lasers using three-point tattoos. SGRT provides solutions to considerations that arise from the conventional setup technique, such as variability in tattoo position and the psychological impact of the tattoos. Moreover, SGRT provides monitoring of intrafractional motion. PURPOSE This literature review covers the basics of SGRT systems and examines whether SGRT can replace the traditional positioning technique. In addition, it investigates SGRT's potential in reducing positioning times, factors affecting SGRT accuracy, the effectiveness of live monitoring, and the impact on patient dosage. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study focused on papers published from 2016 onward that compared SGRT with the traditional positioning technique and investigated factors affecting SGRT accuracy and effectiveness. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS SGRT provides the same or better results regarding patient positioning. The implementation of SGRT can reduce overall treatment time. It is an effective technique for detecting intrafraction patient motion, improving treatment accuracy and precision, and creating a safe and comfortable environment for the patient during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michalis Psarras
- Medical Physics Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Mediterraneo Hospital, 166 75 Athens, Greece
| | - Despoina Stasinou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Mediterraneo Hospital, 166 75 Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Stroubinis
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Mediterraneo Hospital, 166 75 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Protopapa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Mediterraneo Hospital, 166 75 Athens, Greece
| | - Anna Zygogianni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece
| | - Kalliopi Platoni
- Medical Physics Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Mediterraneo Hospital, 166 75 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rudat V, Shi Y, Zhao R, Xu S, Yu W. Setup accuracy and margins for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head, thorax, abdomen, and pelvic target volumes. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17018. [PMID: 37813917 PMCID: PMC10562432 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44320-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal of the study was to evaluate the inter- and intrafractional patient setup accuracy of target volumes located in the head, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions when using SGRT, by comparing it with that of laser alignment using patient skin marks, and to calculate the corresponding setup margins. A total of 2303 radiotherapy fractions of 183 patients were analyzed. All patients received daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography scans (kV-CBCT) for online verification. From November 2019 until September 2020, patient setup was performed using laser alignment with patient skin marks, and since October 2020, using SGRT. The setup accuracy was measured by the six degrees of freedom (6DOF) corrections based on the kV-CBCT. The corresponding setup margins were calculated using the van Herk formula. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the impact of multiple factors on the setup accuracy. The inter-fractional patient setup accuracy was significantly better using SGRT compared to laser alignment with skin marks. The mean three-dimensional vector of the translational setup deviation of tumors located in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis using SGRT was 3.6 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3 mm to 3.9 mm) and 4.5 mm using laser alignment with skin marks (95% CI 3.9 mm to 5.2 mm; p = 0.001). Calculation of setup margins for the combined inter- and intra-fractional setup error revealed similar setup margins using SGRT and kV-CBCT once a week compared to laser alignment with skin marks and kV-CBCT every other day. Furthermore, comparable setup margins were found for open-face thermoplastic masks with AlignRT compared to closed-face thermoplastic masks with laser alignment and mask marks. SGRT opens the possibility to reduce the number of CBCTs while maintaining sufficient setup accuracy. The advantage is a reduction of imaging dose and overall treatment time. Open-face thermoplastic masks may be used instead of closed-face thermoplastic masks to increase the patient's comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Rudat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yanyan Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruping Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuyin Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiahui International Cancer Center Shanghai, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bellala R, Kuppusamy A, Bellala VM, Tyagi T, Manoharan S, Gangarapu G, Bellala R. Review of clinical applications and challenges with surface-guided radiation therapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:1160-1169. [PMID: 37787279 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1147_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the use of this new technique, surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), for patient setup and motion management in various cancers. Materials and Methods Data was collected from 533 patients, who received treatment in our hospital for various malignancies using SGRT from October 2019 to April 2021. We studied patient setup, interfraction position, and patient position during the breath-hold (BH) technique. The main advantage of SGRT is that, it is completely non-invasive and uses visible light to compare the patient's skin surface in the treatment room and planned treatment position. In this analysis, Monaco 5.51.10 (Elekta) treatment planning system, Versa HD Linear Accelerator, and AlignRT 6.2 (Vision RT) SGRT system were used. Results With SGRT, treatment setup time can be reduced with more precision and techniques like Deep inspiration breathhold (DIBH) can be done with very good compliance. Conclusion SGRT has shown improved accuracy in patient setup compared to conventional laser setup. The daily kilo voltage imaging frequency can be reduced; it helps in reducing additional radiation exposure due to imaging. SGRT has demonstrated reproducibility with adequate accuracy in BH treatments in DIBH for breast and SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravishankar Bellala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Anandakrishnan Kuppusamy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Venkat Madhavi Bellala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Tulika Tyagi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Surendhiran Manoharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Gunasekhar Gangarapu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Rishik Bellala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Omega Hospital, Arilova, Health City, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kang S, Jin H, Chang JH, Jang BS, Shin KH, Choi CH, Kim JI. Evaluation of initial patient setup methods for breast cancer between surface-guided radiation therapy and laser alignment based on skin marking in the Halcyon system. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:60. [PMID: 37016351 PMCID: PMC10071653 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02250-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of the daily patient setup for breast cancer patients by applying surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) using the Halcyon system instead of conventional laser alignment based on the skin marking method. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively investigated 228 treatment fractions using two different initial patient setup methods. The accuracy of the residual rotational error of the SGRT system was evaluated by using an in-house breast phantom. The residual translational error was analyzed using the couch position difference in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions between the reference computed tomography and daily kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography acquired from the record and verification system. The residual rotational error (pitch, yaw, and roll) was also calculated using an auto rigid registration between the two images based on Velocity. The total setup time, which combined the initial setup time and imaging time, was analyzed to evaluate the efficiency of the daily patient setup for SGRT. RESULTS The average residual rotational errors using the in-house fabricated breast phantom for pitch, roll, and yaw were 0.14°, 0.13°, and 0.29°, respectively. The average differences in the couch positions for laser alignment based on the skin marking method were 2.7 ± 1.6 mm, 2.0 ± 1.2 mm, and 2.1 ± 1.0 mm for the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average differences in the couch positions were 1.9 ± 1.2 mm, 2.9 ± 2.1 mm, and 1.9 ± 0.7 mm for the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The rotational errors for pitch, yaw, and roll without the surface-guided radiation therapy approach were 0.32 ± 0.30°, 0.51 ± 0.24°, and 0.29 ± 0.22°, respectively. For SGRT, the rotational errors were 0.30 ± 0.22°, 0.51 ± 0.26°, and 0.19 ± 0.13°, respectively. The average total setup times considering both the initial setup time and imaging time were 314 s and 331 s, respectively, with and without SGRT. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that using SGRT improves the accuracy and efficiency of initial patient setups in breast cancer patients using the Halcyon system, which has limitations in correcting the rotational offset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seonghee Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeongmin Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bum-Sup Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao H, Paxton A, Sarkar V, Price RG, Huang J, Su FCF, Li X, Rassiah P, Szegedi M, Salter B. Surface-Guided Patient Setup Versus Traditional Tattoo Markers for Radiation Therapy: Is Tattoo-Less Setup Feasible for Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis Treatment? Cureus 2022; 14:e28644. [PMID: 36196310 PMCID: PMC9525098 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, patient setup accuracy was compared between surface guidance and tattoo markers for radiation therapy treatment sites of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. Methods and materials: A total of 608 setups performed on 59 patients using both surface-guided and tattoo-based patient setups were analyzed. During treatment setup, patients were aligned to room lasers using their tattoos, and then the six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) surface-guided offsets were calculated and recorded using AlignRT system. While the patient remained in the same post-tattoo setup position, target localization imaging (radiographic or ultrasound) was performed and these image-guided shifts were recorded. Finally, surface-guided vs tattoo-based offsets were compared to the final treatment position (based on radiographic or ultrasound imaging) to evaluate the accuracy of the two setup methods. Results: The overall average offsets of tattoo-based and surface-guidance-based patient setups were comparable within 3.2 mm in three principal directions, with offsets from tattoo-based setups being slightly less. The maximum offset for tattoo setups was 2.2 cm vs. 4.3 cm for surface-guidance setups. Larger offsets (ranging from 2.0 to 4.3 cm) were observed for surface-guided setups in 14/608 setups (2.3%). For these same cases, the maximum observed tattoo-based offset was 0.7 cm. Of the cases with larger surface-guided offsets, 13/14 were for abdominal/pelvic treatment sites. Additionally, larger rotations (>3°) were recorded in 18.6% of surface-guided setups. The majority of these larger rotations were observed for abdominal and pelvic sites (~84%). Conclusions: The small average differences observed between tattoo-based and surface-guidance-based patient setups confirm the general equivalence of the two potential methods, and the feasibility of tattoo-less patient setup. However, a significant number of larger surface-guided offsets (translational and rotational) were observed, especially in the abdominal and pelvic regions. These cases should be anticipated and contingency setup methods planned for.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li G. Advances and potential of optical surface imaging in radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac838f. [PMID: 35868290 PMCID: PMC10958463 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac838f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the recent advancements and future potential of optical surface imaging (OSI) in clinical applications as a four-dimensional (4D) imaging modality for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), including OSI systems, clinical SGRT applications, and OSI-based clinical research. The OSI is a non-ionizing radiation imaging modality, offering real-time 3D surface imaging with a large field of view (FOV), suitable for in-room interactive patient setup, and real-time motion monitoring at any couch rotation during radiotherapy. So far, most clinical SGRT applications have focused on treating superficial breast cancer or deep-seated brain cancer in rigid anatomy, because the skin surface can serve as tumor surrogates in these two clinical scenarios, and the procedures for breast treatments in free-breathing (FB) or at deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) are well developed. When using the skin surface as a body-position surrogate, SGRT promises to replace the traditional tattoo/laser-based setup. However, this requires new SGRT procedures for all anatomical sites and new workflows from treatment simulation to delivery. SGRT studies in other anatomical sites have shown slightly higher accuracy and better performance than a tattoo/laser-based setup. In addition, radiographical image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is still necessary, especially for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). To go beyond the external body surface and infer an internal tumor motion, recent studies have shown the clinical potential of OSI-based spirometry to measure dynamic tidal volume as a tumor motion surrogate, and Cherenkov surface imaging to guide and assess treatment delivery. As OSI provides complete datasets of body position, deformation, and motion, it offers an opportunity to replace fiducial-based optical tracking systems. After all, SGRT has great potential for further clinical applications. In this review, OSI technology, applications, and potential are discussed since its first introduction to radiotherapy in 2005, including technical characterization, different commercial systems, and major clinical applications, including conventional SGRT on top of tattoo/laser-based alignment and new SGRT techniques attempting to replace tattoo/laser-based setup. The clinical research for OSI-based tumor tracking is reviewed, including OSI-based spirometry and OSI-guided tumor tracking models. Ongoing clinical research has created more SGRT opportunities for clinical applications beyond the current scope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kutbi M, Peng KC, Wu Z. Zero-Shot Deep Domain Adaptation With Common Representation Learning. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 2022; 44:3909-3924. [PMID: 33621167 DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2021.3061204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Domain Adaptation aims at adapting the knowledge learned from a domain (source-domain) to another (target-domain). Existing approaches typically require a portion of task-relevant target-domain data a priori. We propose an approach, zero-shot deep domain adaptation (ZDDA), which uses paired dual-domain task-irrelevant data to eliminate the need for task-relevant target-domain training data. ZDDA learns to generate common representations for source and target domains data. Then, either domain representation is used later to train a system that works on both domains or having the ability to eliminate the need to either domain in sensor fusion settings. Two variants of ZDDA have been developed: ZDDA for classification task (ZDDA-C) and ZDDA for metric learning task (ZDDA-ML). Another limitation in Existing approaches is that most of them are designed for the closed-set classification task, i.e., the sets of classes in both the source and target domains are "known." However, ZDDA-C is also applicable to the open-set classification task where not all classes are "known" during training. Moreover, the effectiveness of ZDDA-ML shows ZDDA's applicability is not limited to classification tasks. ZDDA-C and ZDDA-ML are tested on classification and metric-learning tasks, respectively. Under most experimental conditions, ZDDA outperforms the baseline without using task-relevant target-domain-training data.
Collapse
|
9
|
Naidoo W, Leech M. Feasibility of surface guided radiotherapy for patient positioning in breast radiotherapy versus conventional tattoo-based setups- a systematic review. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:39-49. [PMID: 35481261 PMCID: PMC9035716 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally tattoos are used for patient setup in radiotherapy. However they may pose challenges for the radiotherapists to achieve precise patient alignment, and serve as a permanent visual reminder of the patient’s diagnosis and often challenging cancer journey. The psychological impact of tattoos has been recognized in recent years. The increasing complexity of treatment techniques and the utilization of hypofractionated regimes, requires an enhanced level of accuracy and safety. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) enables improvements in the accuracy and reproducibility of patient isocentric and postural alignment, enhanced efficiency, and safety in breast radiotherapy. Purpose The aim of this review was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of SGRT to conventional tattoo-based setups in free-breathing breast radiotherapy and to determine if SGRT can reduce the frequency of routine image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Materials and Methods A systematic literature review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Papers identified through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar database searches between 2010 and 2021, were critically appraised. Systematic, random, mean residual errors and 3D vector shifts as determined by IGRT verification were analysed. Results A review of 13 full papers suggests SGRT improves the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup in breast radiotherapy with consistent reductions in the residual errors. There appears to be a good correlation between SGRT setups and radiographic imaging. The frequency of IGRT and the corresponding dose could potentially be reduced. Additionally, SGRT improves treatment efficiency. Conclusion SGRT appears to have improved the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup and treatment efficiency of breast radiotherapy compared to conventional tattoo/laser-based method, with the potential to reduce the frequency of routine IGRT. The reliance on tattoos in breast radiotherapy are likely to become obsolete with positive implications for both patients and clinical practice.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lawler G. A review of surface guidance in extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT/SABR) for set-up and intra-fraction motion management. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:23-26. [PMID: 35079644 PMCID: PMC8777133 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Surface guidance (SG) radiotherapy (RT) is now used by many radiotherapy departments globally and has expanded in popularity over the last number of years. A number of commercial systems are available. SG has routinely been used and is well established for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patient set ups and intra-fraction motion monitoring. However, data is limited in relation to its clinical use for extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), particularly for targets which are impacted by respiratory motion such as the lung and liver. Objective & Information Source A review of available literature was carried out on 24th October 2021 to assess the clinical feasibility and use of SG in SBRT via PubMed. Methods Eligibility Criteria The search criteria involved identifying articles where SG is used in extracranial SBRT. Risk of Bias To eliminate the risk of bias, any particular commercial system was not the focus of the review and not included in the search criteria. Numerous clinical terms for similar things were used to reduce the risk of missing papers e.g. SBRT and SABR. Search Criteria The PRISMA checklist was used. Searching for “surface guidance and radiotherapy” yielded 3271 results, where as “SGRT” alone returned 72 results, when the search term was narrowed down using different iterations of SG and SBRT, only 6 results were available. Of these, 4 had reviewed clinical data in relation to SG and SBRT for patient set up and intra-fraction motion monitoring. Results The 4 studies indicate positive results for using SG with sufficient image guidance (IG) for both patient set up and intra-fraction monitoring during SBRT. This was observed both in free breathing and in patients with respiratory motion management being employed such as deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques. All used multiple IGRT solutions to verify localisation pre-treatment in conjunction with SG. Limitations The number of studies available which report using SG in SBRT is extremely limited. All centres had also installed SG systems therefore this could result in an unconditional bias in using the system positively. Conclusion SG can be used for SBRT set-ups and intra-fraction motion monitoring once sufficient IG is used to verify target localisation for treatment.
Collapse
|
11
|
Al-Hallaq HA, Cerviño L, Gutierrez AN, Havnen-Smith A, Higgins SA, Kügele M, Padilla L, Pawlicki T, Remmes N, Smith K, Tang X, Tomé WA. AAPM task group report 302: Surface guided radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:e82-e112. [PMID: 35179229 PMCID: PMC9314008 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical use of surface imaging has increased dramatically with demonstrated utility for initial patient positioning, real-time motion monitoring, and beam gating in a variety of anatomical sites. The Therapy Physics Subcommittee and the Imaging for Treatment Verification Working Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine commissioned Task Group 302 to review the current clinical uses of surface imaging and emerging clinical applications. The specific charge of this task group was to provide technical guidelines for clinical indications of use for general positioning, breast deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment, and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Additionally, the task group was charged with providing commissioning and on-going quality assurance (QA) requirements for surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) as part of a comprehensive QA program including risk assessment. Workflow considerations for other anatomic sites and for computed tomography (CT) simulation, including motion management are also discussed. Finally, developing clinical applications such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or proton radiotherapy are presented. The recommendations made in this report, which are summarized at the end of the report, are applicable to all video-based SGRT systems available at the time of writing. Review current use of non-ionizing surface imaging functionality and commercially available systems. Summarize commissioning and on-going quality assurance (QA) requirements of surface image-guided systems, including implementation of risk or hazard assessment of surface guided radiotherapy as a part of a total quality management program (e.g., TG-100). Provide clinically relevant technical guidelines that include recommendations for the use of SGRT for general patient positioning, breast DIBH, and frameless brain SRS, including potential pitfalls to avoid when implementing this technology. Discuss emerging clinical applications of SGRT and associated QA implications based on evaluation of technology and risk assessment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hania A Al-Hallaq
- Department of Radiation & Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Laura Cerviño
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Alonso N Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, 33173, USA
| | | | - Susan A Higgins
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Malin Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University, Lund, 221 00, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, 221 00, Sweden
| | - Laura Padilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Todd Pawlicki
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Nicholas Remmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Koren Smith
- IROC Rhode Island, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Lincoln, RI, 02865, USA
| | | | - Wolfgang A Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patient setup accuracy in DIBH radiotherapy of breast cancer with lymph node inclusion using surface tracking and image guidance. Med Dosim 2022; 47:146-150. [PMID: 35039223 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Studying setup accuracy in breast cancer patients with axillary lymph node inclusion in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) after patient setup with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Breast cancer patients (N = 51) were treated (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with axillary lymph nodes within the planning target volume (PTV). Patient setup was initiated with tattoos and lasers, and further adjusted with SGRT. The DIBH guidance was based on SGRT. Orthogonal and/or tangential imaging was analyzed for residual position errors of bony landmarks, the breath-hold level (BHL), the skin outline, and the heart; and setup margins were calculated for the PTV. The calculated PTV margins were 4.3 to 6.3 and 2.8 to 4.6 mm before and after orthogonal imaging, respectively. The residual errors of the heart were 3.6 ± 2.2 mm and 2.5 ± 2.4 mm before and 3.0 ± 2.5 and 2.9 ± 2.3 mm after orthogonal imaging in the combined anterior-posterior/lateral and the cranio-caudal directions, respectively, in tangential images. The humeral head did not benefit from daily IGRT, but SGRT guided it to the correct location. We presented a slightly complicated but highly accurate workflow for DIBH treatments. The residual position errors after both SGRT and IGRT were excellent compared to previous literature. With well-planned SGRT, IGRT brings only slight improvements to systematic accuracy. However, with the calculated PTV margins and the number of outliers, imaging cannot be omitted despite SGRT, unless the PTV margins are re-evaluated.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee H, Park JM, Kim KH, Lee DH, Sohn MJ. Accuracy evaluation of surface registration algorithm using normal distribution transform in stereotactic body radiotherapy/radiosurgery: A phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13521. [PMID: 34985179 PMCID: PMC8906233 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate a feasibility of normal distribution transform (NDT) algorithm compared with the iterative closest point (ICP) method as a useful surface registration in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)/stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS Point cloud images using the 3D triangulation technology were obtained from a depth camera-based optical imaging (OSI) system equipped in a radiosurgery room. Two surface registration algorithms, NDT and ICP, were used to measure and compare the discrepancy values between the reference and the current surfaces during the positioning of the patient. The performance evaluation was investigated by calculating the registration error and root-mean-square (RMS) values for the surface model, reposition, and target accuracy, which were analyzed statistically using a paired t-test. RESULTS For surface model accuracy, the average of the registration error and RMS values were measured as 3.56 ± 2.20 mm and 6.98 ± 1.89 mm for ICP method, and 1.76 ± 1.32 mm and 3.58 ± 1.30 mm for NDT method (p < 0.05). For reposition accuracy, the average registration error and RMS values were calculated as 1.41 ± 0.98 mm and 2.53 ± 1.64 mm using ICP method, and 0.92 ± 0.61 mm and 1.75 ± 0.80 mm using NDT method (p = 0.005). The overall target accuracy using the NDT method reduced the average of the reposition error and overall RMS value by 0.71 and 1.32 mm, respectively, compared to the ICP method (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS We found that the surface registration algorithm based on NDT method provides more reliable accuracy in the values of surface model, reposition, and target accuracies than the classic ICP method. The NDT method in OSI systems offers reasonable accuracy in SBRT/SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haenghwa Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Mee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Hyeon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Lee
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Moon-Jun Sohn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control. Phys Med 2021; 89:243-249. [PMID: 34428608 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC). METHODS Taking the patients' positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient. RESULTS Outlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index Cpk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (Cpk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients. CONCLUSION SPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.
Collapse
|
15
|
Naumann P, Batista V, Farnia B, Fischer J, Liermann J, Tonndorf-Martini E, Rhein B, Debus J. Feasibility of Optical Surface-Guidance for Position Verification and Monitoring of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold. Front Oncol 2020; 10:573279. [PMID: 33102232 PMCID: PMC7546313 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.573279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reductions in tumor movement allow for more precise and accurate radiotherapy with decreased dose delivery to adjacent normal tissue that is crucial in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is an established approach to mitigate respiratory motion during radiotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of combining modern optical surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) to ensure and monitor reproducibility of DIBH and to ensure accurate tumor localization for SBRT as an imaging-guided precision medicine. Methods We defined a new workflow for delivering SBRT in DIBH for lung and liver tumors incorporating SGRT and IGRT with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) twice per treatment fraction. Daily position corrections were analyzed and for every patient two points retrospectively characterized: an anatomically stable landmark (predominately Schmorl's nodes or spinal enostosis) and a respiratory-dependent landmark (predominately surgical clips or branching vessel). The spatial distance of these points was compared for each CBCT and used as surrogate for intra- and interfractional variability. Differences between the lung and liver targets were assessed using the Welch t-test. Finally, the planning target volumes were compared to those of free-breathing plans, prepared as a precautionary measure in case of technical or patient-related problems with DIBH. Results Ten patients were treated with SBRT according this workflow (7 liver, 3 lung). Planning target volumes could be reduced significantly from an average of 148 ml in free breathing to 110 ml utilizing DIBH (p < 0.001, paired t-test). After SGRT-based patient set-up, subsequent IGRT in DIBH yielded significantly higher mean corrections for liver targets compared to lung targets (9 mm vs. 5 mm, p = 0.017). Analysis of spatial distance between the fixed and moveable landmarks confirmed higher interfractional variability (interquartile range (IQR) 6.8 mm) than intrafractional variability (IQR 2.8 mm). In contrast, lung target variability was low, indicating a better correlation of patients' surface to lung targets (intrafractional IQR 2.5 mm and interfractional IQR 1.7 mm). Conclusion SBRT in DIBH utilizing SGRT and IGRT is feasible and results in significantly lower irradiated volumes. Nevertheless, IGRT is of paramount importance given that interfractional variability was high, particularly for liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vania Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jann Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Tonndorf-Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Rhein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, Swinnen A, Sauer TO, Bert C, Giantsoudi D, Corradini S, Batista V. Recent advanced in Surface Guided Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:187. [PMID: 32736570 PMCID: PMC7393906 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01629-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing acceptance and recognition of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) as a promising imaging technique has supported its recent spread in a large number of radiation oncology facilities. Although this technology is not new, many aspects of it have only recently been exploited. This review focuses on the latest SGRT developments, both in the field of general clinical applications and special techniques.SGRT has a wide range of applications, including patient positioning with real-time feedback, patient monitoring throughout the treatment fraction, and motion management (as beam-gating in free-breathing or deep-inspiration breath-hold). Special radiotherapy modalities such as accelerated partial breast irradiation, particle radiotherapy, and pediatrics are the most recent SGRT developments.The fact that SGRT is nowadays used at various body sites has resulted in the need to adapt SGRT workflows to each body site. Current SGRT applications range from traditional breast irradiation, to thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic tumor sites, and include intracranial localizations.Following the latest SGRT applications and their specifications/requirements, a stricter quality assurance program needs to be ensured. Recent publications highlight the need to adapt quality assurance to the radiotherapy equipment type, SGRT technology, anatomic treatment sites, and clinical workflows, which results in a complex and extensive set of tests.Moreover, this review gives an outlook on the leading research trends. In particular, the potential to use deformable surfaces as motion surrogates, to use SGRT to detect anatomical variations along the treatment course, and to help in the establishment of personalized patient treatment (optimized margins and motion management strategies) are increasingly important research topics. SGRT is also emerging in the field of patient safety and integrates measures to reduce common radiotherapeutic risk events (e.g. facial and treatment accessories recognition).This review covers the latest clinical practices of SGRT and provides an outlook on potential applications of this imaging technique. It is intended to provide guidance for new users during the implementation, while triggering experienced users to further explore SGRT applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M. Öllers
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A. Swinnen
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - T.-O. Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C. Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - D. Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V. Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|