1
|
Qubala A, Shafee J, Batista V, Liermann J, Winter M, Piro D, Jäkel O. Comparative evaluation of a surface-based respiratory monitoring system against a pressure sensor for 4DCT image reconstruction in phantoms. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14174. [PMID: 37815197 PMCID: PMC10860430 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), which relies on breathing-induced motion, requires realistic surrogate information of breathing variations to reconstruct the tumor trajectory and motion variability of normal tissues accurately. Therefore, the SimRT surface-guided respiratory monitoring system has been installed on a Siemens CT scanner. This work evaluated the temporal and spatial accuracy of SimRT versus our commonly used pressure sensor, AZ-733 V. A dynamic thorax phantom was used to reproduce regular and irregular breathing patterns acquired by SimRT and Anzai. Various parameters of the recorded breathing patterns, including mean absolute deviations (MAD), Pearson correlations (PC), and tagging precision, were investigated and compared to ground-truth. Furthermore, 4DCT reconstructions were analyzed to assess the volume discrepancy, shape deformation and tumor trajectory. Compared to the ground-truth, SimRT more precisely reproduced the breathing patterns with a MAD range of 0.37 ± 0.27 and 0.92 ± 1.02 mm versus Anzai with 1.75 ± 1.54 and 5.85 ± 3.61 mm for regular and irregular breathing patterns, respectively. Additionally, SimRT provided a more robust PC of 0.994 ± 0.009 and 0.936 ± 0.062 for all investigated breathing patterns. Further, the peak and valley recognition were found to be more accurate and stable using SimRT. The comparison of tumor trajectories revealed discrepancies up to 7.2 and 2.3 mm for Anzai and SimRT, respectively. Moreover, volume discrepancies up to 1.71 ± 1.62% and 1.24 ± 2.02% were found for both Anzai and SimRT, respectively. SimRT was validated across various breathing patterns and showed a more precise and stable breathing tracking, (i) independent of the amplitude and period, (ii) and without placing any physical devices on the patient's body. These findings resulted in a more accurate temporal and spatial accuracy, thus leading to a more realistic 4DCT reconstruction and breathing-adapted treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah Qubala
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO)Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Jehad Shafee
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
- Saarland University of Applied SciencesSaarbrueckenGermany
| | - Vania Batista
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO)Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Radiation OncologyHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO)Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Radiation OncologyHeidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Marcus Winter
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO)Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Daniel Piro
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
- Saarland University of Applied SciencesSaarbrueckenGermany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO)Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO)HeidelbergGermany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation OncologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vinsensia M, Schaub R, Meixner E, Hoegen P, Arians N, Forster T, Hoeltgen L, Köhler C, Uzun-Lang K, Batista V, König L, Zivanovic O, Hennigs A, Golatta M, Heil J, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Incidence and Risk Assessment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Cancer Patients following Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy and Implant-Based Reconstruction. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:265. [PMID: 38254756 PMCID: PMC10813520 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Our study aims to identify the risk factors and dosimetry characteristics associated with capsular contracture. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 118 women with breast cancer who underwent PMRT following an IBR between 2010 and 2022. Patients were treated with PMRT of 50.0-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions. Capsular contracture was categorized according to the Baker Classification for Reconstructed Breasts. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 22 months, the incidence of clinically relevant capsular contracture (Baker III-IV) was 22.9%. Overall, capsular contracture (Baker I-IV) occurred in 56 patients (47.5%) after a median of 9 months after PMRT. The rate of reconstruction failure/implant loss was 25.4%. In the univariate analysis, postoperative complications (prolonged pain, prolonged wound healing, seroma and swelling) and regional nodal involvement were associated with higher rates of capsular contracture (p = 0.017, OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.3 and p = 0.031, respectively). None of the analyzed dosimetric factors or the implant position were associated with a higher risk for capsular contracture. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications and regional nodal involvement were associated with an increased risk of capsular contracture following breast reconstruction and PMRT, while none of the analyzed dosimetric factors were linked to a higher incidence. Additional studies are needed to identify further potential risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vinsensia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Riccarda Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clara Köhler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Uzun-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vania Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andre Hennigs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Batista V, Gober M, Moura F, Webster A, Oellers M, Ramtohul M, Kügele M, Freislederer P, Buschmann M, Anastasi G, Steiner E, Al-Hallaq H, Lehmann J. Surface guided radiation therapy: An international survey on current clinical practice. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 22:1-8. [PMID: 35402740 PMCID: PMC8984757 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) is being increasingly implemented into clinical practice across a number of techniques and irradiation-sites. This technology, which is provided by different vendors, can be used with most simulation- and delivery-systems. However, limited guidelines and the complexity of clinical settings have led to diverse patterns of operation. With the aim to understand current clinical practice a survey was designed focusing on specifics of the clinical implementation and usage. Materials and methods A 32-question survey covered: type and number of systems, quality assurance (QA), clinical workflows, and identification of strengths/limitations. Respondents from different professional groups and countries were invited to participate. The survey was distributed internationally via ESTRO-membership, social media and vendors. Results Of the 278 institutions responding, 172 had at least one SGRT-system and 136 use SGRT clinically. Implementation and QA were primarily based on the vendors' recommendations and phantoms. SGRT was mainly implemented in breast RT (116/136), with strong but diverse representation of other sites. Many (58/135) reported at least partial elimination of skin-marks and a third (43/126) used open-masks. The most common imaging protocol reported included the combination of radiographic imaging with SGRT. Patient positioning (115/136), motion management (104/136) and DIBH (99/136) were the main applications.Main barriers to broader application were cost, system integration issues and lack of demonstrated clinical value. A lack of guidelines in terms of QA of the system was highlighted. Conclusions This overview of the SGRT status has the potential to support users, vendors and organisations in the development of practices, products and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Gober
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - F Moura
- Hospital CUF Descobertas, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A Webster
- Radiotherapy and Proton Beam Therapy, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Oellers
- MAASTRO Clinic, Department of Medical Physics, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Ramtohul
- Department of Medical Physics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham
| | - M Kügele
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Buschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - G Anastasi
- St. Luke's Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, United Kingdom
| | - E Steiner
- Institute for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - H Al-Hallaq
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, USA
| | - J Lehmann
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia.,School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Freislederer P, Batista V, Öllers M, Buschmann M, Steiner E, Kügele M, Fracchiolla F, Corradini S, de Smet M, Moura F, Perryck S, Dionisi F, Nguyen D, Bert C, Lehmann J. ESTRO-ACROP guideline on surface guided radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:188-196. [PMID: 35661677 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Surface guidance systems enable patient positioning and motion monitoring without using ionising radiation. Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) has therefore been widely adopted in radiation therapy in recent years, but guidelines on workflows and specific quality assurance (QA) are lacking. This ESTRO-ACROP guideline aims to give recommendations concerning SGRT roles and responsibilities and highlights common challenges and potential errors. Comprehensive guidelines for procurement, acceptance, commissioning, and QA of SGRT systems installed on computed tomography (CT) simulators, C-arm linacs, closed-bore linacs, and particle therapy treatment systems are presented that will help move to a consensus among SGRT users and facilitate a safe and efficient implementation and clinical application of SGRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - V Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Öllers
- Department of Radiotherapy, MAASTRO, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M Buschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Austria
| | - E Steiner
- Institute for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - M Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - F Fracchiolla
- Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS) Protontherapy Department, Trento, Italy
| | - S Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - M de Smet
- Department of Medical Physics & Instrumentation, Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - F Moura
- Hospital CUF Descobertas, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - S Perryck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| | - F Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - D Nguyen
- Centre de Radiothérapie de Mâcon, France
| | - C Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - J Lehmann
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia; School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia; Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Batista V. SP-0701 Optical and thermal surface tracking. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)04022-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Batista V. SP-0675 The challenge of surface-guided radiotherapy - When, and when not, to use it? Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)08659-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
7
|
Naumann P, Batista V, Farnia B, Fischer J, Liermann J, Tonndorf-Martini E, Rhein B, Debus J. Feasibility of Optical Surface-Guidance for Position Verification and Monitoring of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold. Front Oncol 2020; 10:573279. [PMID: 33102232 PMCID: PMC7546313 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.573279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reductions in tumor movement allow for more precise and accurate radiotherapy with decreased dose delivery to adjacent normal tissue that is crucial in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is an established approach to mitigate respiratory motion during radiotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of combining modern optical surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) to ensure and monitor reproducibility of DIBH and to ensure accurate tumor localization for SBRT as an imaging-guided precision medicine. Methods We defined a new workflow for delivering SBRT in DIBH for lung and liver tumors incorporating SGRT and IGRT with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) twice per treatment fraction. Daily position corrections were analyzed and for every patient two points retrospectively characterized: an anatomically stable landmark (predominately Schmorl's nodes or spinal enostosis) and a respiratory-dependent landmark (predominately surgical clips or branching vessel). The spatial distance of these points was compared for each CBCT and used as surrogate for intra- and interfractional variability. Differences between the lung and liver targets were assessed using the Welch t-test. Finally, the planning target volumes were compared to those of free-breathing plans, prepared as a precautionary measure in case of technical or patient-related problems with DIBH. Results Ten patients were treated with SBRT according this workflow (7 liver, 3 lung). Planning target volumes could be reduced significantly from an average of 148 ml in free breathing to 110 ml utilizing DIBH (p < 0.001, paired t-test). After SGRT-based patient set-up, subsequent IGRT in DIBH yielded significantly higher mean corrections for liver targets compared to lung targets (9 mm vs. 5 mm, p = 0.017). Analysis of spatial distance between the fixed and moveable landmarks confirmed higher interfractional variability (interquartile range (IQR) 6.8 mm) than intrafractional variability (IQR 2.8 mm). In contrast, lung target variability was low, indicating a better correlation of patients' surface to lung targets (intrafractional IQR 2.5 mm and interfractional IQR 1.7 mm). Conclusion SBRT in DIBH utilizing SGRT and IGRT is feasible and results in significantly lower irradiated volumes. Nevertheless, IGRT is of paramount importance given that interfractional variability was high, particularly for liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vania Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Farnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jann Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Tonndorf-Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Rhein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, Swinnen A, Sauer TO, Bert C, Giantsoudi D, Corradini S, Batista V. Correction to: Recent advances in Surface Guided Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:244. [PMID: 33099305 PMCID: PMC7585227 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01661-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - M Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Öllers
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A Swinnen
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - T-O Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Batista V, Meyer J, Kügele M, Al-Hallaq H. Clinical paradigms and challenges in surface guided radiation therapy: Where do we go from here? Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:34-42. [PMID: 32987044 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is becoming a routine tool for patient positioning for specific clinical sites in many clinics. However, it has not yet gained its full potential in terms of widespread adoption. This vision paper first examines some of the difficulties in transitioning to SGRT before exploring the current and future role of SGRT alongside and in concert with other imaging techniques. Finally, future horizons and innovative ideas that may shape and impact the direction of SGRT going forward are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vania Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juergen Meyer
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Department of Radiation Oncology, United States.
| | - Malin Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.
| | - Hania Al-Hallaq
- The University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Freislederer P, Kügele M, Öllers M, Swinnen A, Sauer TO, Bert C, Giantsoudi D, Corradini S, Batista V. Recent advanced in Surface Guided Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:187. [PMID: 32736570 PMCID: PMC7393906 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01629-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The growing acceptance and recognition of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) as a promising imaging technique has supported its recent spread in a large number of radiation oncology facilities. Although this technology is not new, many aspects of it have only recently been exploited. This review focuses on the latest SGRT developments, both in the field of general clinical applications and special techniques.SGRT has a wide range of applications, including patient positioning with real-time feedback, patient monitoring throughout the treatment fraction, and motion management (as beam-gating in free-breathing or deep-inspiration breath-hold). Special radiotherapy modalities such as accelerated partial breast irradiation, particle radiotherapy, and pediatrics are the most recent SGRT developments.The fact that SGRT is nowadays used at various body sites has resulted in the need to adapt SGRT workflows to each body site. Current SGRT applications range from traditional breast irradiation, to thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic tumor sites, and include intracranial localizations.Following the latest SGRT applications and their specifications/requirements, a stricter quality assurance program needs to be ensured. Recent publications highlight the need to adapt quality assurance to the radiotherapy equipment type, SGRT technology, anatomic treatment sites, and clinical workflows, which results in a complex and extensive set of tests.Moreover, this review gives an outlook on the leading research trends. In particular, the potential to use deformable surfaces as motion surrogates, to use SGRT to detect anatomical variations along the treatment course, and to help in the establishment of personalized patient treatment (optimized margins and motion management strategies) are increasingly important research topics. SGRT is also emerging in the field of patient safety and integrates measures to reduce common radiotherapeutic risk events (e.g. facial and treatment accessories recognition).This review covers the latest clinical practices of SGRT and provides an outlook on potential applications of this imaging technique. It is intended to provide guidance for new users during the implementation, while triggering experienced users to further explore SGRT applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M. Öllers
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A. Swinnen
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - T.-O. Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - C. Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - D. Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V. Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Batista V, Richter D, Chaudhri N, Naumann P, Herfarth K, Jäkel O. Significance of intra-fractional motion for pancreatic patients treated with charged particles. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:120. [PMID: 29941049 PMCID: PMC6020245 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1060-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uncertainties associated with the delivery of treatment to moving organs might compromise the accuracy of treatment. This study explores the impact of intra-fractional anatomical changes in pancreatic patients treated with charged particles delivered using a scanning beam. The aim of this paper is to define the potential source of uncertainties, quantify their effect, and to define clinically feasible strategies to reduce them. Methods The study included 14 patients treated at our facility with charged particles (protons or 12C) using intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT). Treatment plans were optimized using the Treatment Planning System (TPS) Syngo® RT Planning. The pre-treatment dose distribution under motion (4D) was simulated using the TPS TRiP4D and the dose delivered for some of the treatment fractions was reconstructed. The volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V95CTV) and the target dose homogeneity were evaluated. The results from the 4D dose calculations were compared with dose distributions in the static case and its variation correlated with the internal motion amplitude and plan modulation, through the Pearson correlation coefficient, as well the significant p-value. The concept of the modulation index (MI) was introduced to assess the degree of modulation of IMPT plans, through the quantification of intensity gradients between neighboring pencil beams. Results The induced breathing motion together with dynamic beam delivery results in an interplay effect, which affects the homogeneity and target coverage of the dose distribution. This effect is stronger (∆V95CTV > 10%) for patients with tumor motion amplitude above 5 mm and a highly modulated dose distribution between and within fields. The MI combined with the internal motion amplitude is shown to correlate with the target dose degradation and a lack of plan robustness against range and positioning uncertainties. Conclusions Under internal motion the use of inhomogeneous plans results in a decrease in the dose homogeneity and target coverage of dose distributions in comparison to the static case. Plan robustness can be improved by using multiple beams and avoiding beam entrance directions susceptible to density changes. 4D dose calculations support the selection of the most suitable plan for the specific patient’s anatomy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1060-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vania Batista
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Richter
- Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.,GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Naved Chaudhri
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center, Div. Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Batista V, Richter D, Combs SE, Jäkel O. Planning strategies for inter-fractional robustness in pancreatic patients treated with scanned carbon therapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:94. [PMID: 28595643 PMCID: PMC5465513 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0832-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Managing inter-fractional anatomy changes is a challenging task in radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors, especially in scanned carbon-ion delivery. This treatment planning study aims to focus on clinically feasible solutions, such as the beam angle selection and margin design to increase the robustness against inter-fractional uncertainties. METHODS This study included 10 patients with weekly 3D-CT imaging and physician-approved Clinical Target Volume (CTV). The study was directed to keep the CTV-coverage using six beam angle configurations in combination with different Internal Target Volume (ITV) concepts. These were: geometric-margin (symmetric 3 and 5 mm margin); range-equivalent margins with an isotropic HU replacement; and to evaluate the need of asymmetric margins the water-equivalent range path (WEPL) was determined per patient from the set of CTs. Plan optimization and forward dose calculation in each week-CT were performed with the research treatment planning system TRiP98 and the plan quality evaluated in terms of CTV coverage (V95CTV) and homogeneity dose (HCTV = D5-D95). RESULTS The beam geometry had a substantial impact on the target irradiation over the treatment course, with the single posterior or two beams showing the best average coverage of the CTV. The use of geometric margins for the more robust beam geometries showed acceptable results, with a V95CTV of (99.2 ± 1.2)% for the 5 mm-margin. For the non-robust configurations, due to substantial changes in the radiological depth, the use of this margin results in a V95CTV that might be below 80%, only showing improvement when the range changes are included. CONCLUSIONS Selection of adequate beam configurations and treatment margins in ion-beam therapy of pancreatic tumors is of great importance. For a single posterior beam or two beam configurations, application of geometrical margins compensate for dose degradation induced by inter-fractional anatomy changes for the majority of the analyzed treatment fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vania Batista
- Hospital for Radiooncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Richter
- University Clinic of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Hospital for Radiooncology and Radiation Therapy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Klinikum rechts der Isa, Technische Universität München, Muniche, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Batista V, Chaudhri N, Richter D, Herfarth K, Jäkel O. Internal target volume margins for liver tumours treated with gated scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aa5988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
14
|
Asim Z, Chen W, Ferreira P, Naumann P, Batista V. Definition of a threshold for plan adaptation in particle therapy. Phys Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
15
|
Batista V, Malveiro R, Mora G. 1357 poster THE EFFECT OF AIR CAVITIES ON THE OPTIMIZATION OF HEAD AND NECK MONACO IMRT TREATMENTS. Radiother Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(11)71479-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Jackson JB, Cubit JD, Keller BD, Batista V, Burns K, Caffey HM, Caldwell RL, Garrity SD, Getter CD, Gonzalez C, Guzman HM, Kaufmann KW, Knap AH, Levings SC, Marshall MJ, Steger R, Thompson RC, Weil E. Ecological Effects of a Major Oil Spill on Panamanian Coastal Marine Communities. Science 1989; 243:37-44. [PMID: 17780421 DOI: 10.1126/science.243.4887.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
In 1986 more than 8 million liters of crude oil spilled into a complex region of mangroves, seagrasses, and coral reefs just east of the Caribbean entrance to the Panama Canal. This was the largest recorded spill into coastal habitats in the tropical Americas. Many population of plants and animals in both oiled and unoiled sites had been studied previously, thereby providing an unprecedented measure of ecological variation before the spill. Documenation of the spread of oil and its biological begun immediately. Intertidal mangroves, algae, and associated invertebrates were covered by oil and died soon after. More surprisingly, there was also extensive mortality of shallow subtidal reef corals and infauna of seagrass beds. After 1.5 years only some organisms in areas exposed to the open sea have recovered.
Collapse
|
17
|
Cubit J, Batista de Yee G, Román A, Batista V. [The value of mangroves and barrier reefs as a natural resource in the province of Colón]. Rev Med Panama 1984; 9:56-67. [PMID: 6142501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
18
|
Finkelstein AE, Roisman FR, Batista V, de Nudelman FG, de Titto EH, Mizraji M, Walz DT. Oral chrysotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: minimum effective dose. J Rheumatol 1980; 7:160-8. [PMID: 6768887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
We studied the dose-response to a new oral gold compound in 28 patients with definite rheumatoid arthritis, divided in 4 groups of 7 patients, each treated with different doses of auranofin for 3 months. Clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded weekly, and blood gold levels (BGL) measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Six and 9 mg daily doses of auranofin were most effective based on clinical and laboratory results. Correlation studies between BGL and percent decrease of humoral measurements, within the 3 months were statistically were statistically significant. Mean BGL, associated with clinical improvement, reached 0.73 microgram/ml, and was accompanied by a 17.6% decrease from initial value of IgG, 17.1% of alpha 2-globulin, 48.9% of RF titer and 25.9% of ESR.
Collapse
|
19
|
Finkelstein AE, Walz DT, Batista V, Mizraji M, Roisman F, Misher A. Auranofin. New oral gold compound for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1976; 35:251-7. [PMID: 791161 PMCID: PMC1006549 DOI: 10.1136/ard.35.3.251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis were treated with SK & F D-39162 (auranofin), a new oral gold compound which was effective in suppressing adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats. Clinical and humoral parameters were studied during a 3-month period of drug administration followed by a 3-month period under placebo. The drug was absorbed, well tolerated, and its action was manifested by a drop in the mean IgG blood levels in the third week of treatment accompanied by clinical improvement after 5 weeks of oral gold intake. Together with IgG changes, an increase of the albumin ratio was observed, as well as a decrease of alpha2-globulin and rheumatoid factor titres. From a total number of 60 swollen joints found initially in the 8 patients only 17 were swollen at week 12 and 9 at week 15. Although the number of patients treated was too small to allow definite conclusions, a follow-up study under placebo of clinical and laboratory changes in the same patients during another 3-month period showed that IgG serum levels rapidly reverted preceding a flare up of disease activity after withdrawal of the drug. This confirmed a direct role in cause-effect relation played by the new oral gold compound.
Collapse
|