Absence of Improvement With Exercise in Some Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Study of Responders and Nonresponders

Features and management of osteoarthritis from the perspective of individuals with osteoarthritis: A systematic review of qualitative studies

Objective

To enable person-centered care, considering beliefs, needs, and priorities of individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) is crucial. Nevertheless, concepts that they consider important are not fully recapitulated in assessment and care. The aim of this study was to clarify how individuals with OA conceive, experience, and manage their OA and pain.

Design

A systematic literature review was conducted including qualitative studies (interviews, focus groups, open questionnaires) regardless of OA joint location. Verbatim quotations relating to OA and OA-related pain were collected and merged in codes. Themes and categories relating to these codes were defined.

Results

The seven databases yielded a total of 9585 studies of which 79 qualitative studies were selected. Analysis of 667 verbatim quotations of 2009 participants led to 117 codes and 24 themes. Themes were grouped into 2 categories, 'features' and 'management'. 'Features' encompassed experiences ranging from common challenges (e.g., adjust to reduced function) to high impact outcomes needing therapeutic attention (e.g., devastating pain). The 'management' category captured positive and negative conceptions associated with pharmacological and cognitive-behavioral self-management, psychoeducation, and interventions. Themes from both categories were classified into four domains: symptoms, functioning, psychological, and social. A fifth domain 'disease' was also used to categorize the themes under 'features'.

Conclusions

Several themes reported by OA individuals are hardly represented in current assessment and recommendations, e.g., fatigue, sleep disturbance, psychosocial impact, and effects on family and caregivers. The reviewed beliefs, needs, and priorities may support individualized screening, complement existing assessment instruments, and can help refine interventions and psychoeducational materials.

The relationship between radiological OA severity or body weight and outcomes following a structured education and exercise therapy program (GLA:D®) for people with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Clinicians may presume people with higher bodyweight or greater OA severity do not respond to exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but few studies have examined this.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between radiographical OA severity or bodyweight and pain and functional outcomes following a structured education and exercise therapy program (Good Life with OsteoArthritis from Denmark: GLA:D®).

METHODS

33 participants with knee OA were assessed at baseline and week 8 following GLA:D®. Outcomes were pain (Visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 (KOOS-12 total), 40 m-fast-paced walk and 30-s chair stand. Multilevel models were used to define the severity of OA in medial, lateral and patellofemoral compartments using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) system and to examine the relationship between compartment severity, bodyweight and outcomes.

RESULTS

No meaningful relationships between bodyweight and response to GLA:D® were found for any outcome measures. Greater medial OA compartment severity was related to less improvement in pain, KOOS-12 and chair stand repetitions. However, all levels of lateral compartment severity had similar improvements, and greater patellofemoral compartment severity was related to more improvement for KOOS-12 and pain.

CONCLUSION

Bodyweight may have little influence on a person's response to a structured education and exercise therapy program. While people with greater medial compartment severity were less likely to improve following the program, OA severity in the PF and lateral compartments was not a barrier to improvement.

A Qualitative Evaluation of Two Electronic-Rehabilitation Programmes for Managing Persistent Knee Pain

INTRODUCTION

Persistent knee pain often due to knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Electronic-rehabilitation (e-rehab) programmes have the potential to support self-management of knee OA. This study aimed to evaluate user engagement and acceptability of two e-rehab programmes, Group e-rehab, a remote physiotherapy-led programme and My Knee UK, a self-directed web-based exercise programme.

METHODS

Descriptive qualitative study nested within a feasibility trial. In-depth interviews were conducted remotely. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants from the feasibility trial took part in the interviews, 10 who received Group e-rehab and eight My Knee UK. Two key themes were engagement with exercise and impact of programme. Despite initial challenges with doing the exercises, most participants found both programmes acceptable and beneficial in improving symptoms and knowledge in managing their knee pain. Multiple factors contributed to motivation to exercise.

DISCUSSION

Understanding more about users' perception and acceptability of both programmes was important to ascertain, both from people who engaged and those who did not engage with the programmes, to make improvements for the future delivery of the e-rehab programmes.

CONCLUSION

Group e-rehab and My Knee UK can support people to self-manage their persistent knee pain due to knee OA. The e-rehab programmes have the potential to improve health services by providing two new models of service delivery enabling more patients to receive support and training to equip them to effectively manage their knee OA.

Barriers and facilitators to exercise-based rehabilitation in people with musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Exercise-based rehabilitation is the first line of treatment for people with musculoskeletal conditions. However, uptake and adherence are suboptimal, compromising the success of rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the barriers and facilitators that influence adherence to exercise-based rehabilitation in people with musculoskeletal conditions. Additionally, to identify the methods and instruments used to determine these barriers and facilitators.

DESIGN

Systematic review METHODS: Five databases from inception to May 2024 using terms related to exercise, musculoskeletal conditions, methods, barriers and facilitators. Risk of bias was assessed using either the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane risk of bias tool. Using an inductive thematic approach, barriers and facilitators were grouped into intrapersonal, interpersonal and community factors. Methods/instruments were categorized into three groups, being questionnaires, interviews and focus-groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-one of 8380 studies were included. The majority of studies were of good or fair quality (95%). The most frequently identified barriers were lack of time (53%), pain (45%) and health (40%). The most frequent facilitators were self-efficacy (42%), perceived health benefits (32%) and previous experiences (30%). The methods used were interviews (n = 53), questionnaires (n = 44) and focus groups (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

Most barriers and facilitators to exercise were related to intrapersonal factors. Although there is a lack of consistency in instruments used, the reported barriers and facilitators were similar across studies. Clinicians and researchers should consider intrapersonal factors when promoting exercise-based rehabilitation programs. Applying a theoretical framework to investigate barriers and facilitators to exercise-based rehabilitation in people with musculoskeletal conditions might assist practitioners to prioritize their practice.

Dropout From Exercise Interventions in Adults With Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and moderators of dropout rates among adults with knee or hip osteoarthritis participating in exercise randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

Two authors searched Embase, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES, and PubMed up to 01/09/2023.

STUDY SELECTION

We included RCTs of exercise interventions in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis that reported dropout rates.

DATA EXTRACTION

Dropout rates from exercise and control conditions and exerciser/participant, provider, and design/implementation related moderators.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In total, 209 RCTs involving 277 exercise arms in 13,102 participants were included (mean age at study level=64 years; median prevalence of men participants=26.8%). The trim-and-fill-adjusted prevalence of dropout across all RCTs was 17.5% (95% CI=16.7%-18.2%), which is comparable with dropout observed in control conditions (trim-and-fill-adjusted odds ratio=0.89; 95% CI=0.71-1.12, P=.37). Higher prevalence of antidepressant use at study-level predicted higher dropout (R2=0.75, P=.002, N RCTs=6, n exercisers=412). Supervision by an exercise professional was associated with lower dropout rates, with a trim-and-fill-adjusted rate of 13.2% (95% CI=11.7%-14.9%) compared with 20.8% without supervision (95% CI=18.3%-23.5%) (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dropout rates for exercise in RCTs are comparable with control conditions, suggesting that exercise is a generally well-accepted intervention. However, interventions should be supervised by an exercise professional, such as a physiotherapist or exercise physiologist, to further minimize the risk of dropout. Health professionals should consider participants' use of antidepressants as a risk factor for dropout from exercise.

Osteoarthritis Year In Review 2024: Rehabilitation and outcomes

This Year in Review presents key highlights from recent research relating to osteoarthritis rehabilitation and its outcomes, defined as any non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatment that aims to improve osteoarthritis symptoms at any joint. Three databases (Medline, Embase, and CINAHL Plus) were searched between 1 March 2023 to 12 March 2024. Relevant studies were chosen based on the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, perceived clinical importance, quality, controversy in the field, or personal interest, and organised into four overarching themes (with 1-5 sub-themes each). The first theme related to uncertainties regarding exercise benefits. New work has challenged the clinical effectiveness of exercise on symptoms, as well as highlighted uncertainty around our understanding of both mechanisms of effects, how to enhance effectiveness and adherence, and which subgroups of people are more or less likely to improve with exercise. However, we also highlight new work confirming the role of exercise as a first-line management strategy. The second theme related to digital modes of service delivery. There was new evidence to support its effectiveness in improving symptoms and clear potential for creating and evaluating new mobile apps. New work also highlighted the potential future role artificial intelligence can have in providing treatment information and recommendations. The third theme related to patient education, and the call for change to the impairment-based narrative that prevails in osteoarthritis information. The fourth theme is related to weight loss. New work compared the effectiveness of different weight loss diets and explored alternative models of weight loss delivery.

Telehealth mindful exercise for people with knee osteoarthritis: A decentralized feasibility randomized controlled trial

Objective

Negative psychological beliefs like fear avoidance and catastrophizing can interfere with exercise engagement in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Mindfulness, when integrated with exercise, could potentially address both psychological and physical impairments. Our objectives were to optimize and assess the feasibility of a novel telehealth, group-based mindful exercise intervention for people with knee OA.

Methods

We conducted a decentralized randomized controlled trial where participants (n ​= ​40) with symptomatic knee OA were randomized into mindful exercise (n ​= ​21) or exercise-only (n ​= ​19) groups. Both groups received supervised group-based interventions weekly for 8-weeks via Zoom. Primary outcomes were safety, fidelity, and feasibility of the mindful exercise intervention. Participants completed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for pain, function, and psychological measures at baseline, week-8, and week-14.

Results

Participants were from 21 US states; >90% identified as having White race, 16% were from rural areas, and approximately 40% had an annual income < $50,000. At 8-weeks, mindful exercise and exercise groups had retention rates of 86% (18/21) and 100% (19/19), and attendance was 54% (11.4/21) and 68% (13/19) respectively. There were no adverse events in the mindful exercise group and four in the exercise group related to exacerbation of knee pain. Preliminary findings showed numerically larger improvements in several PROs for the mindful exercise group.

Conclusion

An 8-week telehealth, group-based, mindful exercise intervention was safe for people with knee OA. Our decentralized approach was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention. Further refinement is needed to improve intervention attendance and participant diversity.

Are the Effects of Resistance Exercise on Pain and Function in Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Dependent on Exercise Volume, Duration, and Adherence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine dose parameters for resistance exercise associated with improvements in pain and physical function in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) and whether these improvements were related to adherence.

METHODS

We searched six databases, from inception to January 28, 2023, for randomized controlled trials comparing land-based, resistance exercise-only interventions with no intervention, or any other intervention. There were four subgroups of intervention duration: 0 to <3 months, 3 to 6 months, >6 to <12 months, ≥12 months. The between-group effect was calculated for immediate postintervention pain and physical function (activities of daily living [ADL] and sports/recreation [SPORT]).

RESULTS

For both knee and hip, data from 280 studies showed moderate benefit for pain, physical function ADL, and physical function SPORT in favor of interventions 3 to 6 months. For the knee, there was also a moderate benefit for physical function ADL in favor of interventions >6 to <12 months. From 151 knee and hip studies that provided total exercise volume data (frequency, time, duration), there was no association between volume with the effect size for pain and physical function. A total of 74 studies (69 knee, 5 hip) reported usable adherence data. There was no association between adherence with the effect size for pain and physical function.

CONCLUSION

In knee and hip OA, resistance exercise interventions 3 to 6 months (and for the knee >6 to <12 months) duration improve pain and physical function. Improvements do not depend on exercise volume or adherence, suggesting exercise does not require rigid adherence to a specific dose.

Integration of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Best-Practice Care for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis and Insomnia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

OBJECTIVE

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common musculoskeletal problem worldwide and its key symptom is pain. Guidelines recommend incorporating comorbidity-specific therapies into patient-centered care. Patients diagnosed with KOA frequently have insomnia, which is associated with higher-pain severity. For this reason, this study protocol outlines the methodology of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi) combined with best-practice KOA care (BPC) compared to best-practice KOA care and lifestyle education.

METHODS

A 2-arm RCT in patients with KOA and insomnia is conducted, in which a total of 128 patients are randomly allocated to an intervention or control group. The experimental intervention consists of 12 sessions of physical therapist-led BPC with an additional 6 sessions of CBTi. The control intervention also receives BPC, which is supplemented with 6 general lifestyle information sessions. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in change in pain severity at 6 months after intervention. Secondary outcomes are pain-related outcomes, sleep-related outcomes, symptoms of anxiety and depression, level of physical activity and function, perceived global improvement, biomarkers of inflammation, and health-related quality of life. Assessments are conducted at baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention. Furthermore, a cost-utility analysis for the proposed intervention will be performed alongside the RCT.

IMPACT

This is the first RCT investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a physical therapist-led intervention integrating CBTi into BPC in patients with KOA and insomnia. The results of this trial will add to the growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of individualized and comorbidity-specific KOA care, which can inform clinical decision-making and assist policymakers and other relevant stakeholders in optimizing the care pathway for patients with KOA.

Improving muscle capacity utilization with a 12-week strengthening program for females with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Strengthening exercise improves symptoms in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but it remains unclear if biomechanical mechanisms contribute to this improvement. Muscle capacity utilization, which reflects the proportion of maximum capacity required to complete tasks, may provide insight into how strengthening exercise improves clinical outcomes in painful knee OA.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine if a 12-week strengthening intervention reduced muscle capacity utilization during walking, squat and lunge tasks in females with painful knee OA.

METHODS

Data from 28 females (age 59.6 ± 6.2 years old; body mass index 29.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with clinical knee OA were included. Participants completed a strengthening intervention 3 times per week for 12 weeks. Knee extensor isometric torque was measured on a commercial dynamometer; peak values from three exertions were averaged. Peak KFM was extracted and averaged from five walking trials. Mean KFM was extracted and averaged from three trials for each of static lunges and squats. Muscle capacity utilization was the ratio of mean peak KFM to peak extensor torque for walking; and mean KFM to peak extensor torque for squats and lunges. Paired t-tests determined differences between peak extensor torque, peak KFM and muscle capacity utilization from pre to post intervention (p < 0.05).

RESULTS & SIGNIFICANCE

Peak extensor torque increased at follow up (p = 0.02). Peak KFM during walking decreased (p = 0.005). Muscle capacity utilization during walking (p = 0.008) and squat (p = 0.002) decreased. Mean KFM and muscle capacity utilization during lunge remained unchanged from pre to post intervention. The reduction in muscle capacity utilization at follow up indicates the strengthening intervention produced a decrease in proportion of the maximal capacity a participant used to complete walking and squat tasks. Strengthening both increases maximal muscle capacity and decreases the net moment required during daily tasks in knee OA.

Feasibility of pain informed movement program for people with knee osteoarthritis

Objective

To establish the feasibility of an intervention consisting of neuromuscular exercise, mind-body techniques, and pain neuroscience education (PNE), referred to as Pain Informed Movement in people with knee Osteoarthritis (KOA). This program has the potential to improve our understanding of intrinsic pain modulation and its role in the management of chronic pain.

Methods

This was a single-arm feasibility trial with a nested qualitative component. Primary outcome: complete follow-up. Inclusion criteria: age ≥40 years, KOA clinical diagnosis or meeting KOA NICE criteria, and pain intensity ≥3/10. The program consisted of 8-week in-person and at-home exercise sessions. PNE and mind-body techniques were provided as videos and integrated into the exercise sessions. Participants completed questionnaires and physical assessments including blood draws at baseline and program completion. Secondary feasibility outcomes: acceptability of the intervention, burden, rates of recruitment, compliance and adherence, and adverse events. A priori success criteria were identified. Participants were invited to an online focus group.

Results

19 participants were enrolled, with a complete follow-up rate of 74% (mean age 63.3 years (SD 10.5), 73% female), indicating modifications were necessary to proceed. All other success criteria were met. The focus groups revealed that the video content pertaining to the mind-body techniques would benefit from on screen demonstrations.

Conclusion

The Pain Informed Movement program is deemed feasible, with minor modifications needed to proceed. A pilot two-arm RCT will be conducted to establish the feasibility and explore potential effects of Pain Informed Movement compared to conventional neuromuscular exercise and standard OA education.

Interpretation threshold values for patient-reported outcomes in patients participating in a digitally delivered first-line treatment program for hip or knee osteoarthritis

Objective

Establish proportions of patients reporting important improvement, acceptable symptoms and treatment failure and define interpretation threshold values for pain, patient-reported function and quality-of-life after participating in digital first-line treatment including education and exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Observational study. Responses to the pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10 best to worst), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 (KOOS-12) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 (HOOS-12, both 0-100 worst to best) were obtained for 4383 (2987) and 2041 (1264) participants with knee (hip) OA at 3 and 12 months post intervention. Threshold values for Minimal Important Change (MIC), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Treatment Failure (TF) were estimated using anchor-based predictive modeling.

Results

70-85% reported an important improvement in pain, function and quality of life after 3 and 12 months follow-up. 42% (3 months) and 51% (12 months) considered their current state as satisfactory, whereas 2-4% considered treatment failed. MIC values were -1 (NRS) and 0-4 (KOOS/HOOS-12) across follow-ups and joint affected. PASS threshold value for NRS was 3, and 53-73 for the KOOS/HOOS-12 subscales Corresponding values for TF were 5 (NRS) and 34-55 (KOOS/HOOS-12). Patients with more severe pain at baseline had higher MIC scores and accepted poorer outcomes at follow-ups.

Conclusion

Threshold estimates aid in the interpretation of outcomes after first-line OA interventions assessed with NRS Pain and KOOS/HOOS-12. Baseline pain severity is important to consider when interpreting threshold values after first-line interventions in these patients.

Exercise Therapy for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: Is There An Ideal Prescription?

Purpose of review

Exercise therapy is the first line treatment for patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) but is consistently underutilized. In this review, we aim to provide health care professionals with an overview of the latest evidence in the areas of exercise therapy for OA, which can serve as a guide for incorporating the ideal exercise therapy prescription in the overall management plan for their patients with OA.

Recent findings

Evidence continues to be produced supporting the use of exercise therapy for all patients with knee or hip OA. Ample evidence exists suggesting exercise therapy is a safe form of treatment, for both joint structures and the patient overall. Several systematic reviews show that exercise therapy is likely to improve patient outcomes, regardless of disease severity or comorbidities. However, no single type of exercise therapy is superior to others.

Summary

Health care practitioners and patients should be encouraged to incorporate exercise therapy into treatment plans and can be assured of the safety profile and likelihood of improvement in important patient outcomes. Since no single exercise therapy program shows vastly superior benefit, patient preference and contextual factors should be central to the shared decision-making process when selecting and individualising appropriate exercise therapy prescriptions.