Smoldering mastocytosis: Survival comparisons with indolent and aggressive mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis in adults: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

OVERVIEW

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) results from clonal proliferation of mast cells (MC) in extracutaneous organs.

DIAGNOSIS

The major criterion is presence of multifocal MC clusters in the bone marrow and/or extracutaneous organs. Minor diagnostic criteria include elevated serum tryptase level, MC CD25/CD2/CD30 expression, and presence of activating KIT mutations.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Establishing SM subtype as per the International Consensus Classification/World Health Organization classification systems is an important first step. Patients either have indolent/smoldering SM (ISM/SSM) or advanced SM, including aggressive SM (ASM), SM with associated myeloid neoplasm (SM-AMN), and mast cell leukemia. Identification of poor-risk mutations (i.e., ASXL1, RUNX1, SRSF2, NRAS) further refines the risk stratification. Several risk models are available to help assign prognosis in SM patients.

MANAGEMENT

Treatment goals for ISM patients are primarily directed toward anaphylaxis prevention/symptom control/osteoporosis treatment. Patients with advanced SM frequently need MC cytoreductive therapy to reverse disease-related organ dysfunction. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (midostaurin, avapritinib) have changed the treatment landscape in SM. While deep biochemical, histological and molecular responses have been documented with avapritinib treatment, its efficacy as monotherapy against a multimutated AMN disease component in SM-AMN patients remains unclear. Cladribine continues to have a role for MC debulking, whereas interferon-α has a diminishing role in the TKI era. Treatment of SM-AMN primarily targets the AMN component, particularly if an aggressive disease such as acute leukemia is present. Allogeneic stem cell transplant has a role in such patients. Imatinib has a therapeutic role only in the rare patient with an imatinib-sensitive KIT mutation.

New Insights into the Pathogenesis of Mastocytosis: Emerging Concepts in Diagnosis and Therapy

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms defined by a numerical increase and accumulation of clonal mast cells (MCs) in various organ systems. The disease may present as cutaneous mastocytosis or systemic mastocytosis (SM). On the basis of histopathological and molecular features, clinical variables, and organ involvement, SM is divided into indolent SM, smoldering SM, SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm, aggressive SM, and MC leukemia. Each variant is defined by unique diagnostic criteria and a unique spectrum of clinical presentations. A key driver of MC expansion and disease evolution is the oncogenic machinery triggered by mutant forms of KIT. The genetic background, additional somatic mutations, and comorbidities also contribute to the course and prognosis. Patients with SM may also suffer from mediator-related symptoms or even an MC activation syndrome. This article provides an update of concepts on the genetics, etiology, and pathology of mastocytosis, with emphasis on diagnostic criteria and new treatment concepts.

Target Therapies for Systemic Mastocytosis: An Update

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) results from a clonal proliferation of abnormal mast cells (MCs) in extra-cutaneous organs. It could be divided into indolent SM, smoldering SM, SM with an associated hematologic (non-MC lineage) neoplasm, aggressive SM, and mast cell leukemia. SM is generally associated with the presence of a gain-of-function somatic mutation in KIT at codon 816. Clinical features could be related to MC mediator release or to uncontrolled infiltration of MCs in different organs. Whereas indolent forms have a near-normal life expectancy, advanced diseases have a poor prognosis with short survival times. Indolent forms should be considered for symptom-directed therapy, while cytoreductive therapy represents the first-line treatment for advanced diseases. Since the emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), KIT inhibition has been an attractive approach. Initial reports showed that only the rare KITD816V negative cases were responsive to first-line TKI imatinib. The development of new TKIs with activity against the KITD816V mutation, such as midostaurin or avapritinib, has changed the management of this disease. This review aims to focus on the available clinical data of therapies for SM and provide insights into possible future therapeutic targets.

Precision Medicine in Systemic Mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a rare hematological neoplasm characterized by the proliferation of abnormal clonal mast cells (MCs) in different cutaneous and extracutaneous organs. Its diagnosis is based on well-defined major and minor criteria, including the pathognomonic dense infiltrate of MCs detected in bone marrow (BM), elevated serum tryptase level, abnormal MCs CD25 expression, and the identification of KIT D816V mutation. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification subdivides mastocytosis into a cutaneous form (CM) and five systemic variants (SM), namely indolent/smoldering (ISM/SSM) and advanced SM (AdvSM) including aggressive SM (ASM), SM associated to hematological neoplasms (SM-AHN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). More than 80% of patients with SM carry a somatic point mutation of KIT at codon 816, which may be targeted by kinase inhibitors. The presence of additional somatic mutations detected by next generation sequencing analysis may impact prognosis and drive treatment strategy, which ranges from symptomatic drugs in indolent forms to kinase-inhibitors active on KIT. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) may be considered in selected SM cases. Here, we review the clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic issues of SM, with special emphasis on the translational implications of SM genetics for a precision medicine approach in clinical practice.

Avapritinib in the Treatment of Systemic Mastocytosis: an Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with systemic mastocytosis, a dangerous and rare myeloid neoplasm, have long had few therapies available to them and, historically, rarely achieved from significant disease control. However, research and translational developments over the last decade have led to promising new options for disease management. In this review, we briefly outline the history of treatment for systemic mastocytosis and subsequently focus on the clinical development and potential applications of avapritinib (previously known as BLU-285), a potent and selective oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase most commonly mutated in this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phase I data and recent phase II data have demonstrated both safety and efficacy of this agent used as monotherapy, even in patients who have progressed on other targeted therapy. Studies to date have focused on patients with the most aggressive disease, but new trials in indolent mastocytosis are accruing currently. Over the next several years, one may anticipate finalized, peer-reviewed, and formally published data for this agent in both advanced systemic and indolent mastocytosis. Evidence from these early studies will also likely highlight where more research is needed.

Systemic Mastocytosis: Molecular Landscape and Implications for Treatment

Over the past decade, we have witnessed significant advances in the molecular characterization of systemic mastocytosis (SM). This has provided important information for a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease but has also practically impacted the way we diagnose and manage it. Advances in molecular testing have run in parallel with advances in therapeutic targeting of constitutive active KIT, the major driver of the disease. Therefore, assessing the molecular landscape in each SM patient is essential for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and therapeutic efficacy monitoring. This is facilitated by the routine availability of novel technologies like digital PCR and NGS. This review aims to summarize the pathogenesis of the disease, discuss the value of molecular diagnostic testing and how it should be performed, and provide an overview of present and future therapeutic concepts based on fine molecular characterization of SM patients.

Systemic mastocytosis in adults: 2021 Update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

OVERVIEW

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) results from a clonal proliferation of abnormal mast cells (MC) in extra-cutaneous organs.

DIAGNOSIS

The major criterion is presence of multifocal clusters of spindled MC in the bone marrow. Minor diagnostic criteria include elevated serum tryptase level, abnormal MC CD25 expression, and presence of KITD816V mutation.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Establishing SM subtype as per the World Health Organization classification system is an important first step. Broadly, patients either have indolent/smoldering SM (ISM/SSM) or advanced SM, the latter includes aggressive SM (ASM), SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). Identification of poor-risk mutations (ie, ASXL1, RUNX1, SRSF2, NRAS) further refines the risk stratification. Recently, clinical and hybrid clinical-molecular risk models have been developed to more accurately assign prognosis in SM patients.

MANAGEMENT

Treatment goals for ISM patients are primarily directed towards anaphylaxis prevention/symptom control/osteoporosis treatment. Patients with advanced SM frequently need MC cytoreductive therapy to ameliorate disease-related organ dysfunction. High response rates have been seen with small-molecule inhibitors that target mutant-KIT, including midostaurin (Food and Drug Administration approved) or avapritinib (investigational). Other options for MC cytoreduction include cladribine or interferon-α, although head-to-head comparisons are lacking. Treatment of SM-AHN primarily targets the AHN component, particularly if an aggressive disease such as acute myeloid leukemia is present. Allogeneic stem cell transplant can be considered in such patients, or in those with relapsed/refractory advanced SM. Imatinib has a limited therapeutic role in SM; effective cytoreduction is limited to those with imatinib-sensitive KIT mutations.

Recent Advances in the Molecular Biology of Systemic Mastocytosis: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

In recent years, molecular characterization and management of patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) have greatly benefited from the application of advanced technologies. Highly sensitive and accurate assays for KIT D816V mutation detection and quantification have allowed the switch to non-invasive peripheral blood testing for patient screening; allele burden has prognostic implications and may be used to monitor therapeutic efficacy. Progress in genetic profiling of KIT, together with the use of next-generation sequencing panels for the characterization of associated gene mutations, have allowed the stratification of patients into three subgroups differing in terms of pathogenesis and prognosis: i) patients with mast cell-restricted KIT D816V; ii) patients with multilineage KIT D816V-involvement; iii) patients with "multi-mutated disease". Thanks to these findings, new prognostic scoring systems combining clinical and molecular data have been developed. Finally, non-genetic SETD2 histone methyltransferase loss of function has recently been identified in advanced SM. Assessment of SETD2 protein levels and activity might provide prognostic information and has opened new research avenues exploring alternative targeted therapeutic strategies. This review discusses how progress in recent years has rapidly complemented previous knowledge improving the molecular characterization of SM, and how this has the potential to impact on patient diagnosis and management.

Magnetic resonance imaging reveals distinct bone marrow patterns in indolent and advanced systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is broadly subcategorized according to mast cell (MC) burden and organ involvement into indolent (ISM), smoldering (SSM), and advanced SM (AdvSM). However, the pattern and extent of bone involvement remains controversial. In this institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, 115 patients with different forms of SM (ISM (n = 37, 32%), SSM (n = 9, 8%), and AdvSM (n = 69, 60%)) underwent a whole-body magnetic resonance imaging including sagittal and coronal T1 and turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequences of the spine. The evaluation included the pattern and extent of pathologic bone marrow (BM) signals in the spine and extremities, osteolytic lesions, and vertebral fractures. A pathologic BM pattern was observed in 4/37 (11%), 8/9 (89%), and 66/69 (96%); affection of the appendicular skeleton in 3/37 (8%), 8/9 (89%), and 67/69 (97%); and vertebral fractures in 7/37 (19%), 0/9, and 13/69 (19%) patients with ISM, SSM, and AdvSM, respectively. In AdvSM, pathologic BM pattern included activated (62%), diffuse sclerotic (25%), and small-spotted BM (9%), respectively. Only activated/sclerotic BM was associated with significantly higher MC burden, organ damage, and inferior median survival (2.9 years, p = 0.04). Vertebral fractures resembled classical multi-segmental osteoporotic fractures in ISM but not in AdvSM in which they were only found in activated/sclerotic BM. Only one patient with AdvSM had a focal osteolytic lesion in the femur. Activated/sclerotic BM changes of the spine and affection of the appendicular skeleton are indicative for SSM or AdvSM. Osteolytic lesions, which are very rare, and osteoporotic fractures are ineligible for the diagnosis of AdvSM.

Myelodysplasia as assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry refines prognostic stratification provided by genotypic risk in systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by extreme heterogeneity of manifestations and prognosis. Several disease-related biomarkers, including clinical, hematological and molecular variables, have been correlated with prognosis. Although relevant, the mutation profile closely reflects the WHO classification that has per se prognostic value. High-risk mutations (HRM) are largely confined to advanced forms, and thus fail in providing information regarding progression and outcome in the not-advanced variants. In this work, we studied hematopoietic cells by multi-parameter flow cytometry (MFC) in order to highlight dysplastic traits that might provide insights into outcome. A score previously validated for myelodysplastic syndromes, with high reproducibility in standard diagnostics, was used. The application of an MFC score to a cohort of 71 SM cases, concurrently genotyped for configuring a HRM category, resulted in the identification of two separate patients' categories (MFC+ and MFC-) characterized by significantly different clinical and laboratory features at presentation. The extent of dysplasia by MFC tended to parallel WHO-category and genotype-related stratification. MFC+ patients had shorter survival compared to MFC- ones, for whom the incidence of progression and/or death was virtually null. Of note, MFC score remained prognostically informative in unadvanced subsets. Furthermore, the integration of MFC and HRM was an independent predictor for outcome, also overcoming WHO-categories in multivariate analysis for EFS. Our results support the use of MFC analysis in the evaluation of patients with SM, alone and in combination with HRM, for refinement of prognosis assessment.