1
|
Fellner A, Goldberg Y, Basel-Salmon L. Ordering genetic testing by neurologists: points to consider. J Neurol 2023:10.1007/s00415-023-11758-3. [PMID: 37154893 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11758-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
A significant challenge limiting the comprehensive utilization of genomic medicine is the lack of timely access to genetics specialists. Although neurologists see patients for whom genetic testing should be considered, the knowledge regarding the choice of the optimal genetic test for each case and the management of the test results are out of the scope of their everyday practice. In this review, we provide a step-by-step guide for non-geneticist physicians through the decision-making process when ordering diagnostic genetic testing for monogenic neurological diseases and when dealing with their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avi Fellner
- The Neurogenetics Clinic, Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel.
| | - Yael Goldberg
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Lina Basel-Salmon
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Recchia G, Lawrence AC, Freeman AL. Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:None. [PMID: 36518604 PMCID: PMC9731905 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians are often advised to use pictographs to communicate risk, but whether they offer benefits when communicating risk imprecision (e.g., 65%-79%) is unknown. PURPOSE To test whether any of three approaches to visualizing imprecision would more effectively communicate breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. METHODS 1,300 UK residents were presented with a genetic report with information about BRCA1-related risks, with random assignment to one of four formats: no visualization (text alone), or a pictograph using shaded icons, a gradient, or arrows marking range endpoints. We also tested pictographs in two layouts. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression was employed. RESULTS There was no effect of format. Participants shown pictographs vs. text alone had better uptake of breast cancer risk messages (p < .05, η 2 = 0.003). Pictographs facilitated memory for the specific amount of risk (p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.019), as did the tabular layout. Individuals not having completed upper secondary education may benefit most. CONCLUSIONS We found weak evidence in favor of using simple pictographs with ranges to communicate BRCA risk (versus text alone), and of the tabular layout. INNOVATION Testing different ways of communicating imprecision within pictographs is a novel and promising line of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Recchia
- Corresponding author at: Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Rd, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Recchia G, Chiappi A, Chandratillake G, Raymond L, Freeman ALJ. Creating genetic reports that are understood by nonspecialists: a case study. Genet Med 2019; 22:353-361. [PMID: 31506646 PMCID: PMC7000324 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0649-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend that genetic reports should be clear to nonspecialists, including patients. We investigated the feasibility of creating reports for cystic fibrosis carrier testing through a rapid user-centered design process that built on a previously developed generic template. We evaluated the new reports' communication efficacy and effects on comprehension against comparable reports used in current clinical practice. METHODS Thirty participants took part in three rounds of interviews. Usability problems were identified and rectified in each round. One hundred ninety-three participants took part in an evaluation of the resulting reports measuring subjective comprehension, risk probability comprehension, perceived communication efficacy, and other factors, as compared with standard reports. RESULTS Participants viewing the user-centered reports rated them as clearer, easier to understand, and more effective at communicating key information than standard reports. Both groups ended up with equivalent knowledge of risk probabilities, although we observed differences in how those probabilities were perceived. CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate that by starting with a patient-friendly generic report template and modifying it for specific scenarios with a rapid user-centered design process, reports can be produced that are more effective at communicating key information. The resulting reports are now being implemented into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Recchia
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Antonia Chiappi
- Institute of Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gemma Chandratillake
- Institute of Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,East of England NHS Genomic Medicine Centre, London, UK
| | - Lucy Raymond
- East of England NHS Genomic Medicine Centre, London, UK.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,NIHR Bioresource-Rare Disease, London, UK
| | - Alexandra L J Freeman
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miron-Shatz T, Rapaport SR, Srebnik N, Hanoch Y, Rabinowitz J, Doniger GM, Levi L, Rolison JJ, Tsafrir A. Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:59-68. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0120-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
5
|
Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding. Genome Med 2014; 6:58. [PMID: 25473429 PMCID: PMC4254435 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-014-0058-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
With the emergence of electronic medical records and patient portals, patients are increasingly able to access their health records, including laboratory reports. However, laboratory reports are usually written for clinicians rather than patients, who may not understand much of the information in the report. While several professional guidelines define the content of test reports, there are no guidelines to inform the development of a patient-friendly laboratory report. In this Opinion, we consider patient barriers to comprehension of lab results and suggest several options to reformat the lab report to promote understanding of test results and their significance to patient care, and to reduce patient anxiety and confusion. In particular, patients’ health literacy, genetic literacy, e-health literacy and risk perception may influence their overall understanding of lab results and affect patient care. We propose four options to reformat lab reports: 1) inclusion of an interpretive summary section, 2) a summary letter to accompany the lab report, 3) development of a patient user guide to be provided with the report, and 4) a completely revised patient-friendly report. The complexity of genetic and genomic test reports poses a major challenge to patient understanding that warrants the development of a report more appropriate for patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Swanson A, Ramos E, Snyder H. Next Generation Sequencing is the Impetus for the Next Generation of Laboratory-Based Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:647-54. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9684-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 12/12/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
7
|
Christian S, Lilley M, Hume S, Scott P, Somerville M. Defining the role of laboratory genetic counselor. J Genet Couns 2011; 21:605-11. [PMID: 22075756 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9419-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2011] [Accepted: 10/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
An increasing number of genetic counselors are moving into non-clinical roles, where their primary duties do not involve direct patient contact. According to the National Society of Genetic Counselors Professional Status Survey in 2010, 23% of counselors working in non-clinical roles identified laboratory or genetic testing as their primary area of work. Using a survey, we identified 43 genetic counselors who work predominately in laboratory settings. The two primary tasks performed by participants, include acting as a customer liaison (95%) and calling out test results (88%). Nineteen participants (44.2%) also reported spending a considerable amount of time signing reports. The most prevalent areas of job satisfaction were support from laboratory directors (76.8%), autonomy (76.7%), interactions with clinicians (69.7%) and interaction with other genetics counselors (67.5%). This is the first study specifically looking at the roles of laboratory genetic counselors, which is an expanding area of genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Christian
- Genetic Laboratory Services, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lubin IM, McGovern MM, Gibson Z, Gross SJ, Lyon E, Pagon RA, Pratt VM, Rashid J, Shaw C, Stoddard L, Trotter TL, Williams MS, Amos Wilson J, Pass K. Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report. J Mol Diagn 2009; 11:162-71. [PMID: 19197001 DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of molecular genetic tests for heritable conditions is expected to increase in medical settings, where genetic knowledge is often limited. As part of a project to improve the clarity of genetic test result reports to minimize misunderstandings that could compromise patient care, we sought input about format and content from practicing primary care clinicians. In facilitated workgroup discussions, clinicians from pediatric, obstetrics-gynecology, and family practice provided their perspectives about molecular genetic testing with a focus on the laboratory reporting of test results. Common principles for enhancing the readability and comprehension of test result reports were derived from these discussions. These principles address the presentation of patient- and test-specific information, the test result interpretation, and guidance for future steps. Model test result reports for DNA-based cystic fibrosis testing are presented that were developed based on workgroup discussions, previous studies, and professional guidelines. The format of these model test reports, which are applicable to a variety of molecular genetic tests, should be useful for communicating essential information from the laboratory to health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ira M Lubin
- Division of Laboratory Systems, NCPDCID, CCID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy., MS-G23, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lubin IM, Caggana M, Constantin C, Gross SJ, Lyon E, Pagon RA, Trotter TL, Wilson JA, McGovern MM. Ordering molecular genetic tests and reporting results: practices in laboratory and clinical settings. J Mol Diagn 2008; 10:459-68. [PMID: 18669879 DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.080050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that patient care may be compromised as a consequence of poor communication between clinicians and laboratory professionals in cases in which molecular genetic test results are reported. To understand better the contributing factors to such compromised care, we investigated both pre- and postanalytical processes using cystic fibrosis mutation analysis as our model. We found that although the majority of test requisition forms requested patient/family information that was necessary for the proper interpretation of test results, in many cases, these data were not provided by the individuals filling out the forms. We found instances in which result reports for simulated diagnostic testing described individuals as carriers where only a single mutation was found with no comment pertaining to a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Similarly, reports based on simulated scenarios for carrier testing were problematic when no mutations were identified, and the patient's race/ethnicity and family history were not discussed in reference to residual risk of disease. Remarkably, a pilot survey of obstetrician-gynecologists revealed that office staff, including secretaries, often helped order genetic tests and reported test results to patients, raising questions about what efforts are undertaken to ensure personnel competency. These findings are reviewed in light of what efforts should be taken to improve the quality of test-ordering and result-reporting practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ira M Lubin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS-G23, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Molecular testing: improving patient care through partnering with laboratory genetic counselors. Genet Med 2008; 10:337-42. [DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31817283a5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
11
|
Tomatir AG, Sorkun HC, Demirhan H, Akdağ B. Genetics and genetic counseling: Practices and opinions of primary care physicians in Turkey. Genet Med 2007; 9:130-5. [PMID: 17304055 DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3180306880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the educational needs of physicians relating to genetics and genetic counseling in the Denizli region of Turkey. METHODS Data were collected by questionnaire about physicians' approaches to genetics and genetic counseling. RESULTS A total of 60 (60.0%) of 100 physicians working in Denizli province returned a questionnaire. Physicians described "their most knowledgeable subjects" in basic genetic information as chromosome abnormalities (41.8%), in genetic disorders as xeroderma pigmentosum (80.0%), and in genetic counseling as directing the parents of and couples with a risk for having a child affected by a genetic disease to an expert or a genetic counseling center (94.8%). Only 20.7% knew the ethical regulations and techniques related to genetic counseling. Physicians thought that they did not have sufficient knowledge about genetics or genetic counseling, and 83.9% would like to attend an educational course. CONCLUSIONS As a result of this study, a genetics course is planned for physicians so they can actively participate in the prevention and early diagnosis of genetic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayşe Gaye Tomatir
- Department of Medical Biology, Pamukkale University Medical Faculty, Denizli, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|