A familial balanced inverted insertion ins(15)(q15q13q11.2) producing Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome and duplication of 15q11.2-q13 in a single family: Importance of differentiation from a paracentric inversion

Rare 15q21.1q22.31 Duplication Due to a Familial Chromosomal Insertion and Diagnostic Investigation in a Carrier of Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangement and Intellectual Disability

Insertions are rare balanced chromosomal rearrangements with an increased risk of imbalances for the offspring. Moreover, balanced rearrangements in individuals with abnormal phenotypes may be associated to the phenotype by different mechanisms. This study describes a three-generation family with a rare chromosomal insertion. G-banded karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), whole-exome sequencing (WES), and low-pass whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were performed. Six individuals had the balanced insertion [ins(9;15)(q33;q21.1q22.31)] and three individuals had the derivative chromosome 9 [der(9)ins(9;15)(q33;q21.1q22.31)]. The three subjects with unbalanced rearrangement showed similar clinical features, including intellectual disability, short stature, and facial dysmorphisms. CMA of these individuals revealed a duplication of 19.3 Mb at 15q21.1q22.31. A subject with balanced rearrangement presented with microcephaly, severe intellectual disability, absent speech, motor stereotypy, and ataxia. CMA of this patient did not reveal pathogenic copy number variations and low-pass WGS showed a disruption of the RABGAP1 gene at the 9q33 breakpoint. This gene has been recently associated with a recessive disorder, which is not compatible with the mode of inheritance in this patient. WES revealed an 88 bp deletion in the MECP2 gene, consistent with Rett syndrome. This study describes the clinical features associated with the rare 15q21.1-q22.31 duplication and reinforces that searching for other genetic causes is warranted for individuals with inherited balanced chromosomal rearrangements and abnormal phenotypes.

Two familial intrachromosomal insertions with maternal dup(6)(p22.3p25.3) or dup(2)(q24.2q32.1) in recombinant offspring

In this study, we describe two patients with a recombinant chromosome secondary to a maternal intrachromosomal insertion. Patient 1 was a girl with dup(6)(p22.3p25.3). Patient 2 was a boy with dup(2)(q24.2q32.1). Both familial rearrangements were characterized by means of GTG-bands, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization microarray analyses. Patient 1 had an ∼23 Mb gain that involved the bands 6p22.3-6p25.3. Patient 2 had an ∼23 Mb gain (cytobands 2q24.2-2q32.1) and a further ∼1.9 Mb gain of 2p16.2-p16.3. The phenotype of each patient was in agreement with the typical 6p duplication or 2q24.2q32.1 duplication syndrome. The compound macular lesion in patient 1 suggests that retinal anomalies may be a part of the 6p trisomy phenotype. Among the 70 intrachromosomal insertions compiled here (including 68 from the literature), four were submicroscopic unbalanced insertions inherited from a balanced carrier and 66 were detectable on banded chromosomes (with or without array comparative genomic hybridization or other high-resolution assessment) and therefore spanned at least 5 Mb. Pericentric insertions are found in most chromosomes, whereas the paracentric ones are mainly observed in large and medium chromosome arms. That the former outnumber the latter in almost a 2 : 1 ratio appears to be related to the technique of diagnosis, size of the insertion, and size of the involved chromosome. Regardless of the apparent excess of carrier mothers, carriers of an intrachromosomal insertion beget almost twice as many children with a duplication than with a deletion.

PGD for a carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion using aCGH

Intrachromosomal insertions are rare and difficult to diagnose. However, making the correct diagnosis is critical for genetic risk assessment, and prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis outcomes. We present a case of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) following trophectoderm biopsy of embryos created after in vitro fertilization for a carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion on chromosome 1 [46,XX, ins(1)(q44q23q32.1)]. The PGD analysis of 6 blastocysts demonstrated 67% unbalanced embryos. No pregnancy was achieved after the transfer of 2 euploid embryos. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PGD using aCGH following trophectoderm biopsy for a carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion.

Partial trisomy 2p and partial monosomy 2q arising from a paternal intrachromosomal 2q-into-2p between-arm insertion and paracentric inversion: molecular cytogenetic characterization of a four-break rearrangement

We report on a 26-month-old boy with an interstitial duplication of 2p22.3p22.2 and an interstitial deletion of 2q14.1q21.2. The abnormality was derived from his father having a balanced paracentric inversion and pericentric insertion. The deletion in the child was identified by cytogenetic analysis and characterized in more detail by molecular cytogenetics and array comparative genomic hybridization. The latter revealed a 20-Mb deletion in the long arm and a 5.6-Mb duplication in the short arm of chromosome 2. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in paternal chromosomes characterized an intrachromosomal insertion of 2q14.1q21.2 into 2p23; additionally a paracentric inversion of 2p13p23 was observed. The boy with the unbalanced karyotype suffered from severe psychomotor retardation, thrombophilia due to protein C deficiency, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and also had phenotypic abnormalities. Most of these features have previously been described in individuals with interstitial deletion of 2q14.1.

Molecular and Clinical Aspects of Angelman Syndrome

The Angelman syndrome is caused by disruption of the UBE3A gene and is clinically delineated by the combination of severe mental disability, seizures, absent speech, hypermotoric and ataxic movements, and certain remarkable behaviors. Those with the syndrome have a predisposition toward apparent happiness and paroxysms of laughter, and this finding helps distinguish Angelman syndrome from other conditions involving severe developmental handicap. Accurate diagnosis rests on a combination of clinical criteria and molecular and/or cytogenetic testing. Analysis of parent-specific DNA methylation imprints in the critical 15q11.2-q13 genomic region identifies 75-80% of all individuals with the syndrome, including those with cytogenetic deletions, imprinting center defects and paternal uniparental disomy. In the remaining group, UBE3A sequence analysis identifies an additional percentage of patients, but 5-10% will remain who appear to have the major clinical phenotypic features but do not have any identifiable genetic abnormalities. Genetic counseling for recurrence risk is complicated because multiple genetic mechanisms can disrupt the UBE3A gene, and there is also a unique inheritance pattern associated with UBE3A imprinting. Angelman syndrome is a prototypical developmental syndrome due to its remarkable behavioral phenotype and because UBE3A is so crucial to normal synaptic function and neural plasticity.

Parametric approach to genomic imprinting analysis with applications to Angelman's syndrome

Genomic imprinting is a mechanism by which only one copy of a gene pair is expressed, and this expression is determined by the parental origin of the copy. The deregulation of imprinted genes has been implicated in a number of human diseases. The Imprinted Gene Catalogue now has more than 200 genes listed, and estimates based on mouse models suggest many more may exist in humans. Therefore, the development of methods to identify such genes is important. In this communication, we present a parametric model-based approach to analyzing arbitrary-sized pedigree data for genomic imprinting. We have modified widely used LINKAGE program to incorporate our proposed approach. In addition, our approach allows for the use of sex-specific recombinations in the analysis, which is of particular importance in a genome-wide analysis for imprinted genes. We compared our imprinting analysis approach to that implemented in the GENEHUNTER-IMPRINT program using simulation studies as well as by analyzing causal genes in Angelman's syndrome families, which are known to be imprinted. These analyses showed that the proposed approach is very powerful for detecting imprinted genes in large pedigrees.

Intrachromosomal insertion mimicking a pericentric inversion: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a three break rearrangement of chromosome 20

Intrachromosomal insertions are uncommon rearrangements, in which a chromosomal segment is intercalated into another part of the same chromosome. The insertion may occur in the same arm (paracentric) or in the other arm (pericentric). The cytogenetic recognition of these structurally rearranged chromosomes can be difficult, and intrachromosomal insertions can be easily mistaken for inversions. We describe a case of a familial pericentric insertion of chromosome 20, initially misdiagnosed as a pericentric inversion in the healthy carrier and then reinterpreted as insertion in an abnormal child with a recombinant chromosome. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) allowed us to confirm the mechanism of recombinant formation and to locate the three breakpoints precisely. Our cytogenetically unbalanced epileptic patient carried a 20q deletion and 20p duplication, and the genes, CHRNA4 and KCNQ2 that have been implicated in autosomal dominant epilepsy, were deleted. The haplo-insufficiency of these two genes may contribute to the cause of epilepsy in patients with ring chromosome 20.