Effects of ophthalmologic solutions on sinonasal ciliated epithelium

In vitro safety of ketotifen as a topical nasal rinse

BACKGROUND

Ketotifen is a second-generation noncompetitive H1-antihistamine and mast-cell stabilizer. It is commonly used to treat or prevent allergic conjunctivitis, asthma, chronic urticaria, anaphylaxis, mast-cell, and other allergic-type disorders. However, it has never been studied in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), an aggressive phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, where the mast cell plays a prominent role its pathogenesis.

METHODS

Human sinonasal epithelial cells were grown at an air-liquid interface (ALI). Ketotifen powder was dissolved in saline to make 4 test solutions at 1.04, 2.08, 10.4, and 20.8 µg/mL. Control (saline) or ketotifen solution was added apically to ALI cultures from tissue of 5 unique patients, and ciliary beat frequency (CBF) changes were recorded. Lactate dehydrogenase was measured at 24 and 48 hours to estimate long-term cellular toxicity.

RESULTS

Apical application of ketotifen at all concentrations was neither ciliotoxic nor ciliostimulatory, with no change in CBF over a period of 15 minutes after application. Cellular toxicity for all concentrations at 24 and 48 hours after application was <3% and <7%, respectively, that of lysed cultures.

CONCLUSION

Topical application of ketotifen to an in vitro model of sinonasal epithelium is safe, as evaluated by CBF and lactate dehydrogenase. Ketotifen is neither ciliotoxic nor ciliostimulatory, and no long-term cellular toxicity was observed. Ketotifen may have promise as a topical nasal rinse in the treatment of AERD.

Antibiotic eluting sinus stents

OBJECTIVES

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a multifactorial disease affecting up to 16% of the United States population and disproportionately affecting the cystic fibrosis (CF) patient population. Despite treating the underlying infection, the use of systemic antibiotics has shown little efficacy in alleviation of symptom burden. This review seeks to discuss recent research on novel antibiotic eluting stent therapy in vitro and within animal models as well as the factors that contribute to its efficacy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed literature review.

REVIEW METHODS

A review of all published literature related to antibiotic eluting sinus stents was conducted to integrate and summarize this innovative approach to chronic sinus infections.

RESULTS

Placement of the ciprofloxacin sinus stent (CSS) and ciprofloxacin-ivacaftor sinus stent (CISS) exhibited improvement in endoscopic and radiographic findings in rabbit CRS models. While the CSS showed an overall trend toward improvement in microscopic findings and a reduction in biofilm mass, there remained a significant quantity of planktonic bacteria due to antibiotic depletion from an initial burst release in the first 48 hours of stent placement. The CISS and ciprofloxacin-azithromycin sinus stents (CASSs) exhibited controlled antibiotic release over the study period leading to greatly reduced planktonic bacterial load and biofilm mass. In vitro studies indicate that CASS may be just as efficacious at reducing biofilm mass.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic eluting sinus stents show significant promise as a novel therapeutic strategy for CRS. The CISS may have particular promise for the CF patient population by addressing both the infectious and genetic components of disease. Animal studies demonstrate significant promise for translation into human studies. Human clinical trials are warranted to determine the efficacy of antibiotic sinus stents in human patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.