Quality-of-life instruments in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery-A practical systematic review

The skull base chordoma patient reported outcome survey (sbCPROS): a patient-centered, disease-specific tool for assessing quality of life in chordoma patients

PURPOSE

Chordomas are rare malignant tumors arising from the embryological notochord that present most frequently in the lumbosacral spine, followed by the skull base, with an overall 1/1,000,000 incidence. These tumors and their treatment significantly affect quality of life (QOL) due to intricate anatomical locations and aggressive treatment regimens. Despite these challenges, there are currently no disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys for chordomas. We aimed to develop a tool to assess QOL in patients with skull base chordomas (sbCs).

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients who underwent sbC resection were interviewed on QOL throughout their care. Grounded-theory analysis of interview transcripts generated 7 themes. We developed an initial survey with 79 items from existing general and anatomic-specific QOL assessment tools addressing these themes. Ten chordoma providers and 10 new patients completed an anonymous Qualtrics survey, rating items' relevance on a 5-point Likert scale to validate survey content. An a priori cutoff of > 3.0 was used for significant relevance. Mean relevance scores for each item were compared between providers and patients as well as between skull base respondents and 5 control patients with lumbar spine and sacral chordomas, using two-sided Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

Seventy-four items reached the relevance threshold. These were consolidated to create the final 42-item Skull Base Chordoma Patient Reported Outcome Survey (sbCPROS). Providers significantly overvalued items related to the themes of pain (73%), sleep changes (60%), and sensory & motor symptoms (43%) relative to patients. Ten items were more relevant to skull base patients than patients with spinal tumors (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The authors developed a novel patient-centered, disease-specific PRO instrument to assess change in QOL for sbC patients over time. sbCPROS may provide significant insight into the delivery of high quality care for patients with sbCs and guide patient-physician discussions about care decision-making.

Anatomical Step-by-Step Dissection of Complex Skull Base Approaches for Trainees: Surgical Anatomy of the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Anterior Cranial Fossa

Introduction  The development of endoscopic techniques has made endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) increasingly popular. Still, the steps and nuances involved in the approach may be difficult to understand for trainees. Thus, we aim to didactically describe the EEAs to the ACF in an anatomically based, step-by-step manner with supplementary clinical cases. Methods  Six cadaveric head specimens were dissected. Endoscopic endonasal Draf I, IIA, IIB, and III frontal sinusotomies, endoscopic endonasal superior ethmoidectomy, and endoscopic endonasal transcribriform and transplanum approaches were modularly performed. The specimens were photodocumented with endoscopic techniques. Results  Draf I frontal sinusotomy started with the complete removal of the anteromedial portion of the agger nasi cell, exposing the medial orbital wall, cranial base, and anterior cribriform plate. Draf II frontal sinusotomy proceeded with the removal of the floor of the frontal sinus between the lamina papyracea and the middle turbinate (IIa), and the nasal septum (IIb) until the first olfactory filaments were exposed. Draf III proceeded by creating a superior septal window just below the floor of the frontal sinus. The bone of the ACF bounded by the limbus sphenoidale posteriorly, frontal sinus anteriorly, and the medial orbital walls bilaterally was removed; the cribriform plate was removed; and the crista galli was dissected free from the dural leaflets of the falx cerebri and removed. Conclusion  We provide a step-by-step dissection describing basic surgical steps and anatomy of the EEAs to the ACF to facilitate the learning process for skull base surgery trainees.

SNOT-22 subdomain outcomes following treatment for sinonasal malignancy: A prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Patients with sinonasal malignancy (SNM) present with significant sinonasal quality of life (QOL) impairment. Global sinonasal QOL as measured by the 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) has been shown to improve with treatment. This study aims to characterize SNOT-22 subdomain outcomes in SNM.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SNM were prospectively enrolled in a multi-center patient registry. SNOT-22 scores were collected at the time of diagnosis and through the post-treatment period for up to 5 years. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify drivers of variation in SNOT-22 subdomains.

RESULTS

Note that 234 patients were reviewed, with a mean follow-up of 22 months (3 months-64 months). Rhinologic, psychological, and sleep subdomains significantly improved versus baseline (all p < 0.05). Subanalysis of 40 patients with follow-up at all timepoints showed statistically significant improvement in rhinologic, extra-nasal, psychological, and sleep subdomains, with minimal clinically important difference met between 2 and 5 years in sleep and psychological subdomains. Adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with worse outcomes in rhinologic (adjusted odds ratio (5.22 [1.69-8.66])), extra-nasal (2.21 [0.22-4.17]) and ear/facial (5.53 [2.10-8.91]) subdomains. Pterygopalatine fossa involvement was associated with worse outcomes in rhinologic (3.22 [0.54-5.93]) and ear/facial (2.97 [0.32-5.65]) subdomains. Positive margins (5.74 [2.17-9.29]) and surgical approach-combined versus endoscopic (3.41 [0.78-6.05])-were associated with worse psychological outcomes. Adjuvant radiation (2.28 [0.18-4.40]) was associated with worse sleep outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinonasal QOL improvements associated with treatment of SNM are driven by rhinologic, extra-nasal, psychological, and sleep subdomains.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

3D printing for virtual surgical planning of nasoseptal flap skull-base reconstruction: A proof-of-concept study

KEY POINTS

3D printing for virtual surgical planning of nasoseptal flap skull base reconstruction is a viable approach. Results indicate improved mucosal preservation but further research is needed to define impact on quality of life.

SNOT-22 Quality of Life Scores Improve After Endoscopic Endonasal Repair of Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea

OBJECTIVES

Patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea can experience significant sinonasal symptom burden, leading to poor quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to investigate sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) scores in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery for spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and compare them to patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP).

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea and CRSsNP was performed. Pre-surgery and post-surgery SNOT-22 scores and domains were compared within each group. Improvements in SNOT-22 scores after surgery were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were in the CSF rhinorrhea group and 105 patients were in the CRSsNP group. Within each group, surgery significantly improved total SNOT-22 scores, domain scores, and most of the individual symptoms. Comparing the 2 groups revealed similar improvements in total SNOT-22 scores (P = .244). The CSF rhinorrhea group improved more in runny nose (P < .001), postnasal discharge (P < .001), wake up at night (P = .024), and embarrassed (P = .002). The CRSsNP group improved more in sneezing (P = .027), nasal blockage (P < .001), decreased sense of smell/taste (P = .011), thick nasal discharge (P < .001), facial pain/pressure (P = .008), and the ear/facial domain (P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea experience significant symptom burden. Those who undergo CSF leak repair should experience significant improvement in QOL similar to patients who undergo ESS for CRSsNP as measured by SNOT-22.

Quality of Life Considerations in Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Cranial Base Tumors

Considering quality of life (QOL) is critical when discussing treatment options for patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for cancers at the base of the skull. Several questionnaires have been developed and validated in the last 20 years to explore QOL in this patient population, including the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire, Skull Base Inventory, EESBS Questionnaire, and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test for Neurosurgery. The Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test-22 and Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 are other tools that have been used to measure sinonasal QOL in anterior cranial base surgery. In addition to pathology-related perturbations in QOL endoscopic surgical options (transsellar approaches, anterior cranial base surgery, and various reconstructive techniques) all have unique morbidities and QOL implications that should be considered. Finally, we look ahead to new and emerging techniques and tools aimed to help preserve and improve QOL for patients with anterior cranial base malignancies.

Skull Base Registries: A Roadmap

Hospitals, payors, and patients increasingly expect us to report our outcomes in more detail and to justify our treatment decisions and costs. Although there are many stakeholders in surgical outcomes, physicians must take the lead role in defining how outcomes are assessed. Skull base lesions interact with surrounding anatomy to produce a complex spectrum of presentations and surgical challenges, requiring a wide variety of surgical approaches. Moreover, many skull base lesions are relatively rare. These factors and others often preclude the use of prospective randomized clinical trials, thus necessitating alternate methods of scientific inquiry. In this paper, we propose a roadmap for implementing a skull base registry, along with expected benefits and challenges.

Optimizing Quality of Life and Minimizing Morbidity through Nasal Preservation in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Contemporary Review

Introduction  Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) are increasingly utilized for intracranial pathology. As opposed to sinonasal tumors, the nasal cavity is being used as a corridor to access these intracranial tumors but is not the site of primary surgical intent. Accordingly, there has been recent interest in preserving intranasal structures not directly involved by tumor and improving postoperative sinonasal quality of life (QOL). Objectives  The aim of the study is to highlight recent advances in EEA techniques focused on improving sinonasal QOL including turbinate preservation, reducing the morbidity of reconstructive techniques, and the development of alternative minimally invasive EEA corridors. Methods  The method of the study involves contemporary literature review and summary of implications for clinical practice. Results  Nasoseptal flap (NSF) harvest is associated with significant morbidity including septal perforation, prolonged nasal crusting, and external nasal deformities. Various grafting and local rotational flaps have demonstrated the ability to significantly limit donor site morbidity. Free mucosal grafts have re-emerged as a reliable reconstructive option for sellar defects with an excellent sinonasal morbidity profile. Middle turbinate preservation is achievable in most EEA cases and has not been shown to cause postoperative obstructive sinusitis. Recently developed minimally invasive EEA techniques such as the superior ethmoidal approach have been described to better preserve intranasal structures while allowing intracranial access to resect skull base tumors and have shown promising sinonasal QOL results. Conclusion  This contemporary review discusses balancing effective skull base reconstructive techniques with associated morbidity, the role of turbinate preservation in EEA, and the development of unique EEA techniques that allow for increased nasal structure preservation.

Extending the use of the Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire in a cross-sectional study: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis versus healthy controls

OBJECTIVES

There are several instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Unfortunately, none of them evaluates all three health domains (physical, social and psychological) important to assess the overall well-being of the patient. The Endoscopic Endonasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (EES-Q) does assess all these elements. Initially, the EES-Q is validated to evaluate the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on HRQoL. The aim of this study is to assess whether EES-Q outcomes differ in patients with CRS compared with healthy individuals. Therefore, extending the use of the EES-Q for all CRS patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred patients with uncontrolled CRS (50% with nasal polyps) scheduled to receive EES. The questionnaire was completed preoperatively. Healthy control subjects (n = 100) without any history of sinusitis or a known current medical treatment at a hospital were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mann-Whitney U test was performed to identify differences in EES-Q scores (domain scores and EES-Q score).

RESULTS

The median EES-Q score in CRS patients (33.8) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in the control group (10.4). As well as the physical (52.5 vs. 16.4, p < 0.001), psychological (13.8 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001) and social (37.5 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001) domain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

With this study, we are extending the use of the EES-Q. It indicates that the EES-Q can be a valuable clinical tool to assess multidimensional HRQoL in all patients with CRS.

Mayo Clinic Clival Chordoma Case Series: Impact of Endoscopic Training on Clinical Care

The management of clival chordoma in our group shifted around 2013 to mostly endoscopic, and proton beam was introduced for our multidisciplinary team. Consecutive patients who had surgical resection from 1987 to 2021 were reviewed. A total of 58 patients (39 patients after 2013) were analyzed. The mean tumor size was 3.7 cm, and the most common location was the upper clivus (43%). Compared to before 2013, after 2013, the endoscopic endonasal approach was more common (90%, p < 0.001), and more gross or near total resections (64%, p = 0.002) were attained. Ten cases (17%) were revision surgeries referred from elsewhere, and three cases (5%) underwent additional surgery elsewhere before adjuvant radiation. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in 7%. Post-operative new cranial nerve deficits occurred in 32% before 2013, compared to 2.6% after 2013 (p = 0.004). For cases before 2013, 10 patients (53%) recurred during the median follow-up of 144 months (mean, 142 months), whereas for cases after 2013, seven patients (18%) recurred with a median follow-up of 35 months (mean, 42 months). 5-year progression-free survival was 58%, and 5-year overall survival was 87%. A specialized multidisciplinary team improved the resection rate compared to a historical cohort with an excellent morbidity profile.

The Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap for Cranial Base Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

While pedicled intranasal flaps, such as the nasoseptal flap (NSF), successfully reduce postoperative CSF leaks following endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the skull base, morbidity remains prevalent. This study describes the first cadaveric description and radiographic analysis of the posterior septal nasal floor mucosal flap (PSNF) designed to reduce pedicled nasal flap morbidity. A case series is also detailed.

STUDY DESIGN

Cadaveric dissection, radiographic analysis, and case series.

METHODS

Seven cadaver specimens underwent harvest of the PSNF. PSNF flap dimensions were measured on the thirty deidentified sinus computed tomography (CT) scans. A retrospective case series was performed on the first set of patients who received the PSNF for reconstruction of a sellar base defect. Information concerning complications, symptoms, and the appearance of the flap was recorded from records of the patient's postoperative inpatient stay, 1-week postop visit, and 1-month postop visit.

RESULTS

Cadaver dissection of the PSNF flap demonstrated good arc rotation along its pedicle with ability to cover both sellar and planum defects. Cadaveric flap measurements and CT-derived measurements estimated a mean surface area of 16.7 and 18.3 cm² , respectively. 15 patients underwent reconstruction of a sellar or planum defect using the PSNF technique. Only one CSF leak was encountered postoperatively. Minimal crusting of the flap and donor site was seen 1 month postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The PSNF flap provides a sizeable pedicled region for reconstruction comparable to other pedicled nasal flaps. Our case series demonstrated good postoperative outcomes without reduced donor site morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2022.