Effect of oral 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and calcium on glucocorticoid-induced osteopenia in patients with rheumatic diseases

A survey of hypercalciuria during chemotherapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Urolithiasis is an extremely rare complication in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and some reports have implicated corticosteroids during chemotherapy as a risk factor for it. However, only a few reports have analyzed urinary electrolytes in this context.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 55 patients with ALL who underwent chemotherapy between October 2007 and January 2019. Their median age was 9.3 years (range, 0.3-24.0 years) with 30 males and 25 females. Lineages were B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) in 42 patients, T-cell in nine and others in four patients. All patients received chemotherapy based on the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster regimen.

RESULTS

Forty-nine out of the 55 ALL patients exhibited hypercalciuria at least once during chemotherapy. Moreover, 36 patients with BCP-ALL, who were receiving identical Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-based regimens, exhibited significantly high urinary calcium excretion immediately following high-dose glucocorticoid administration. Among the 55 ALL patients, urolithiasis was observed in one patient, a 6-year-old boy with BCP-ALL who developed urolithiasis at reinduction chemotherapy just after cessation of high-dose dexamethasone administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 90% of the ALL patients studied developed hypercalciuria during chemotherapy in strong association with corticosteroid administration.

Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: clinical data in relation to disease demographics, bone mineral density and fracture risk

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the most common type of secondary osteoporosis. Patient selection and the treatment choice remain to be controversial. None of the proposed management guidelines are widely accepted. We evaluate the available clinical data, the efficacy of current medication and we propose an overall algorithm for managing GIOP.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a critical review of in vivo and clinical evidence regarding GIOP and developing evidence-based algorithm of treatment. Data base used includes MEDLINE® (1950 to May 2014).

EXPERT OPINION

Patient-specific treatment is the gold standard of care. Glucocorticoid (GC)-treated patients must comply with a healthy lifestyle and receive 1000 mg of calcium and at least 800 mg of Vitamin D daily. Bisphosphonate (BP) therapy is the current standard of care for prevention and treatment of GIOP. Most of bisphosphonates demonstrated benefit in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) and some in hip BMD. Alendronate, risedronate and zoledronate showed vertebral anti-fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women and men. Scarce data however when compared head to head with BP efficacy. In post-menopausal women, early antiresorptive BP treatment appears to be efficient and safe. In premenopausal women and patients at high risk of fracture receiving long-term GC therapy however, teriparitide may be advised alternatively.

Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults

BACKGROUND

Available evidence on the effects of vitamin D on mortality has been inconclusive. In a recent systematic review, we found evidence that vitamin D3 may decrease mortality in mostly elderly women. The present systematic review updates and reassesses the benefits and harms of vitamin D supplementation used in primary and secondary prophylaxis of mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in healthy adults and adults in a stable phase of disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Science Citation Index-Expanded and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (all up to February 2012). We checked references of included trials and pharmaceutical companies for unidentified relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials that compared any type of vitamin D in any dose with any duration and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention in adult participants. Participants could have been recruited from the general population or from patients diagnosed with a disease in a stable phase. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental vitamin D (vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol)) or as an active form of vitamin D (1α-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Six review authors extracted data independently. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RRs). To account for trials with zero events, we performed meta-analyses of dichotomous data using risk differences (RDs) and empirical continuity corrections. We used published data and data obtained by contacting trial authors.To minimise the risk of systematic error, we assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. Trial sequential analyses controlled the risk of random errors possibly caused by cumulative meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 159 randomised clinical trials. Ninety-four trials reported no mortality, and nine trials reported mortality but did not report in which intervention group the mortality occurred. Accordingly, 56 randomised trials with 95,286 participants provided usable data on mortality. The age of participants ranged from 18 to 107 years. Most trials included women older than 70 years. The mean proportion of women was 77%. Forty-eight of the trials randomly assigned 94,491 healthy participants. Of these, four trials included healthy volunteers, nine trials included postmenopausal women and 35 trials included older people living on their own or in institutional care. The remaining eight trials randomly assigned 795 participants with neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory or rheumatoid diseases. Vitamin D was administered for a weighted mean of 4.4 years. More than half of the trials had a low risk of bias. All trials were conducted in high-income countries. Forty-five trials (80%) reported the baseline vitamin D status of participants based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Participants in 19 trials had vitamin D adequacy (at or above 20 ng/mL). Participants in the remaining 26 trials had vitamin D insufficiency (less than 20 ng/mL).Vitamin D decreased mortality in all 56 trials analysed together (5,920/47,472 (12.5%) vs 6,077/47,814 (12.7%); RR 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 0.99); P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%). More than 8% of participants dropped out. 'Worst-best case' and 'best-worst case' scenario analyses demonstrated that vitamin D could be associated with a dramatic increase or decrease in mortality. When different forms of vitamin D were assessed in separate analyses, only vitamin D3 decreased mortality (4,153/37,817 (11.0%) vs 4,340/38,110 (11.4%); RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98); P = 0.002; I(2) = 0%; 75,927 participants; 38 trials). Vitamin D2, alfacalcidol and calcitriol did not significantly affect mortality. A subgroup analysis of trials at high risk of bias suggested that vitamin D2 may even increase mortality, but this finding could be due to random errors. Trial sequential analysis supported our finding regarding vitamin D3, with the cumulative Z-score breaking the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit, corresponding to 150 people treated over five years to prevent one additional death. We did not observe any statistically significant differences in the effect of vitamin D on mortality in subgroup analyses of trials at low risk of bias compared with trials at high risk of bias; of trials using placebo compared with trials using no intervention in the control group; of trials with no risk of industry bias compared with trials with risk of industry bias; of trials assessing primary prevention compared with trials assessing secondary prevention; of trials including participants with vitamin D level below 20 ng/mL at entry compared with trials including participants with vitamin D levels equal to or greater than 20 ng/mL at entry; of trials including ambulatory participants compared with trials including institutionalised participants; of trials using concomitant calcium supplementation compared with trials without calcium; of trials using a dose below 800 IU per day compared with trials using doses above 800 IU per day; and of trials including only women compared with trials including both sexes or only men. Vitamin D3 statistically significantly decreased cancer mortality (RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.98); P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%; 44,492 participants; 4 trials). Vitamin D3 combined with calcium increased the risk of nephrolithiasis (RR 1.17 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.34); P = 0.02; I(2) = 0%; 42,876 participants; 4 trials). Alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased the risk of hypercalcaemia (RR 3.18 (95% CI 1.17 to 8.68); P = 0.02; I(2) = 17%; 710 participants; 3 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D3 seemed to decrease mortality in elderly people living independently or in institutional care. Vitamin D2, alfacalcidol and calcitriol had no statistically significant beneficial effects on mortality. Vitamin D3 combined with calcium increased nephrolithiasis. Both alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased hypercalcaemia. Because of risks of attrition bias originating from substantial dropout of participants and of outcome reporting bias due to a number of trials not reporting on mortality, as well as a number of other weaknesses in our evidence, further placebo-controlled randomised trials seem warranted.

Use of a computerized order set to increase prescription of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in patients receiving glucocorticoids

BACKGROUND

American College of Rheumatology guidelines recommend that patients taking glucocorticoids also take calcium and vitamin D supplements, regardless of the dose or intended duration of glucocorticoid use, to decrease their risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteopenia or osteoporosis (GIOP).

OBJECTIVE

To increase the number of prescriptions made for calcium and vitamin D in patients who receive a prescription for glucocorticoids using an automated, computerized order set.

DESIGN

Pre-post test design.

PATIENTS

A total of 1,041 outpatients receiving care at a single VA medical center. INTERVENTION/MAIN MEASURES: We developed an automated order set in which calcium and vitamin D were automatically co-ordered with glucocorticoid prescriptions of at least 2-week duration. We tested the impact of the order set by comparing the number of calcium and vitamin D prescriptions in patients taking glucocorticoids during a 12-month period before (T1) and after (T2) implementation. The automated order set could be modified by the treating physician, and it was not generated for patients with hypercalcemia.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 535 patients during T1 and 506 patients during T2 had a glucocorticoid prescription of at least 2-week duration. The percent of co-prescriptions for calcium increased from 37 to 49% and vitamin D from 38 to 53% (both p < 0.0001) after the new automated order set was implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an automatic prescription for calcium and vitamin D supplementation modestly increases the number of patients on glucocorticoids who are prescribed calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

This paper provides a framework for the development of national guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women aged 18 years and over in whom oral glucocorticoid therapy is considered for 3 months or longer.

INTRODUCTION

The need for updated guidelines for Europe and other parts of the world was recognised by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society, which set up a joint Guideline Working Group at the end of 2010.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The epidemiology of GIO is reviewed. Assessment of risk used a fracture probability-based approach, and intervention thresholds were based on 10-year probabilities using FRAX. The efficacy of intervention was assessed by a systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidance for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is updated in the light of new treatments and methods of assessment. National guidelines derived from this resource need to be tailored within the national healthcare framework of each country.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: an update for dermatologists

Long-term corticosteroid treatment is the most common secondary cause of bone loss. Patients treated with long-term corticosteroid therapy may develop osteopenia or osteoporosis, and many have fractures. It is difficult to predict which corticosteroid-treated patients will develop significant skeletal complications because of variability in the underlying diseases treated with corticosteroids, and because of variation in corticosteroid dose over time. Corticosteroid therapy causes an alteration in the ratio between osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B (RANK) ligand (RANKL), which leads to early increased bone resorption for the first 3-6 months, with long-term treatment leading primarily to suppression of bone formation. Recently published recommendations advise the use of bisphosphonates or teriparatide in high-risk patients, depending on fracture risk assessed by bone mineral density testing. This article gives an update of current knowledge regarding the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and evaluation, and prevention and treatment of patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Clinical review: Do glucocorticosteroids alter vitamin D status? A systematic review with meta-analyses of observational studies

CONTEXT

Vitamin D supplementation is an important adjunct therapy for the prevention and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. There has been little exploration of the relationship between glucocorticosteroid (GCS) use and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D].

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically explore how serum 25(OH)D is altered in adult patients receiving GCS.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed Medline and Cinahl databases between January 1970 and August 2011.

STUDY SELECTION

Experimental studies were included where 25(OH)D was measured in patients more than 18 yr of age receiving GCS therapy. Studies were excluded if patients received at least 400 IU/d (10 μg/d) vitamin D, if GCS treatment was less than 2-wk duration, if more than 50% of the study population received GCS for renal or hepatic disease or after transplant, or if the study population included patients with Cushing's syndrome. A consensus method was used to classify studies. Of identified studies, 3% met the selection criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by a single author. Study quality was assessed using criteria developed by the American Dietetic Association.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The weighted mean 25(OH)D (by sample size or sd) was 22.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.4, 25.3] ng/ml and 21.0 (95% CI, 13.5, 28.5) ng/ml, respectively. Random effects meta-analysis was used to compare serum 25(OH)D in patients treated with GCS compared to steroid-naive controls (either healthy or with active disease) and in patients before and after GCS administration. Serum 25(OH)D in GCS users was on average -0.5 (95% CI, -1.0, -0.1) ng/ml lower than in healthy controls (P=0.03; I2=56.4%). Serum 25(OH)D did not differ between GCS users and disease controls [standardized mean difference=0.0 (95% CI, -0.2, 0.3) ng/ml; P=0.793; I2=16.2%].

CONCLUSION

The suboptimal concentrations of serum 25(OH)D found in adults receiving GCS are inadequate for prevention and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Recommendations for vitamin D supplementation should be adjusted accordingly.

Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults

BACKGROUND

The available evidence on vitamin D and mortality is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D for prevention of mortality in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (to January 2011). We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and asked experts and pharmaceutical companies for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials that compared vitamin D at any dose, duration, and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental vitamin D (vitamin D(3) (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D(2) (ergocalciferol)) or an active form of vitamin D (1α-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Six authors extracted data independently. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RR). To account for trials with zero events, meta-analyses of dichotomous data were repeated using risk differences (RD) and empirical continuity corrections. Risk of bias was considered in order to minimise risk of systematic errors. Trial sequential analyses were conducted to minimise the risk of random errors.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty randomised trials with 94,148 participants provided data for the mortality analyses. Most trials included elderly women (older than 70 years). Vitamin D was administered for a median of two years. More than one half of the trials had a low risk of bias. Overall, vitamin D decreased mortality (RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.00, I(2) = 0%). When the different forms of vitamin D were assessed separately, only vitamin D(3) decreased mortality significantly (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98, I(2) = 0%; 74,789 participants, 32 trials) whereas vitamin D(2), alfacalcidol, or calcitriol did not. Trial sequential analysis supported our finding regarding vitamin D(3), corresponding to 161 individuals treated to prevent one additional death. Vitamin D(3) combined with calcium increased the risk of nephrolithiasis (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34, I(2) = 0%). Alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased the risk of hypercalcaemia (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.68, I(2) = 17%). Data on health-related quality of life and health economics were inconclusive.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D in the form of vitamin D(3) seems to decrease mortality in predominantly elderly women who are mainly in institutions and dependent care. Vitamin D(2), alfacalcidol, and calcitriol had no statistically significant effect on mortality. Vitamin D(3) combined with calcium significantly increased nephrolithiasis. Both alfacalcidol and calcitriol significantly increased hypercalcaemia.

Emerging consensus on prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is a common but still relatively neglected problem, with a low level of awareness among primary and secondary care physicians. Fractures appear early after initiation of treatment, and effective prophylaxis requires primary prevention in those at high risk of fracture. Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice, and calcium and vitamin D supplements are also indicated in the majority of individuals. Organized care programs together with the use of evidence-based guidelines have the potential to improve significantly the management of this serious complication of glucocorticoid therapy.

Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoids continue to be used for many inflammatory diseases, and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) remains the most common secondary form of metabolic bone disease. Recent meta-analyses suggest that both active and native vitamin D can help maintain lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), particularly in patients receiving lower-dose glucocorticoid therapy. Recent randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown that oral bisphosphonates are superior to vitamin D in maintaining BMD and should be continued for as long as a person receives glucocorticoid treatment. Similar to the oral bisphosphonates, intravenous ibandronate has been shown to preserve BMD and also to significantly reduce vertebral fracture risk. Increasing evidence supports a role for parathyroid hormone to prevent or treat GIOP as well. Despite effective therapies, many at-risk patients fail to receive treatment for GIOP, and even among those who initiate treatment, half discontinue within 1 to 2 years. New approaches to evidence implementation are being tested to improve the quality of osteoporosis care and decrease fracture risk among long-term glucocorticoid users.

Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approach

GCs constitute a therapeutic class largely used in clinical medicine for the curative or supportive treatment of various conditions involving the intervention of numerous medical specialties. Beyond their favorable therapeutic effects, GCs almost invariably provoke bone loss and a rapid increase in bone fragility, with its host of fractures. Men and postmenopausal women constitute a preferential target for the bone complications of GCs. The premenopausal status is not, however, a shelter; bone loss also happens in young women who are on GCs. Exposure to GCs yields a fracture risk exceeding the risk conferred by a low BMD per se. Therefore, some reason exists to settle the BMD threshold for therapeutic intervention not at -2.5 T-scores but at -1.0 or -1.5 T-scores, even if no prospective randomized trial so far endorses that opinion. Nowadays, bisphosphonate therapy should be proposed to every patient at risk for fragility fracture, along with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Studies of other therapeutic modalities (eg, promoters of bone formation) are in progress.

Calcitriol does not prevent bone loss in patients with asthma receiving corticosteroid therapy: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Oral glucocorticoid therapy reduces bone mineral density (BMD) and increases fracture risk. It is uncertain whether inhaled glucocorticoids, the most commonly used long-term therapy for asthma, have a similar effect. If bone loss does occur, it is unclear whether this is preventable by calcitriol. Patients with asthma receiving inhalational plus intermittent oral glucocorticoids lose bone, and treatment with 0.5 microg/day of calcitriol will prevent bone loss.

METHODS

A 2-year randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. One hundred eight patients with asthma were stratified by gender, age, and inhaled glucocorticoid dose and treated with calcitriol (n=55) or placebo (n=53). There were 41 men (mean age 53.2+/-1.7 years) and 67 women (mean age 49.1+/-1 years) with moderate to severe asthma (requiring >/=800 microg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent maintenance therapy). BMD values at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were measured at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months using dual x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Changes in LS and FN BMD. Bone loss occurred in both groups at the FN (both p<0.03) and at the LS in the calcitriol (p<0.001), but not the control, group. Bone loss was not less in the calcitriol group at either site.

CONCLUSION

Patients with asthma receiving inhalational plus intermittent short courses of oral glucocorticoids lose bone. Calcitriol is unlikely to be appropriate therapy against this bone loss.

Prevention and treatment strategies for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporotic fractures

Glucocorticoids are the most common cause of drug-related osteoporosis. We reviewed current evidence on risk factors for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) and prevention and treatment of GIOP-related fractures. Guidelines for GIOP management published since 2000 were also reviewed. Significant bone loss and increased fracture risk is seen with daily prednisone doses as low as 5 mg. Alternate-day glucocorticoid therapy can lead to similar bone loss. No conclusive evidence exists for a safe minimum dose or duration of glucocorticoid exposure. Physicians should consider risk factors for involutional osteoporosis such as older age, postmenopausal status, and baseline bone density measurements as they assess patients for prevention or treatment of GIOP. Bisphosphonates were reported to reduce GIOP-related vertebral fractures, but inconclusive data exist for hip fractures associated with glucocorticoid use. Hormone replacement therapy and parathyroid hormone analogs are effective in preserving bone density in GIOP. The risk of osteoporosis and fractures should be routinely assessed in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy. Effective prevention and treatment options are available and can result in meaningful reduction of GIOP-related morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines for GIOP management recommend bisphosphonates, especially alendronate and risedronate, as first-line agents for GIOP, and these guidelines propose the preventive use of bisphosphonates early in the course of glucocorticoid therapy in high-risk patient subgroups.

Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently prescribed for various inflammatory and/or life-threatening conditions concerning many systems in the body. However, they can provoke many aftereffects, of which osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most crippling complications, with its host of fractures. The dramatic increase in bone fragility is mainly attributable to the GC-induced rapid bone loss in all skeletal compartments. We have reviewed the meta-analyses and randomized controlled studies reporting medical therapeutic interventions currently registered in Belgium for the management of GC-OP comparatively with a placebo. Based on this research, an expert meeting developed a consensus on the prevention and therapy of GC-OP. The pathophysiology of GC-OP is complex. Several factors, acting separately or synergistically, have been described. Their great number could help to understand the rapidity of bone loss and of bone fragility occurrence, indicating that a rapid therapeutic intervention should be implemented to avoid complications. All patients on GCs are threatened with OP, so the prevention and/or therapy of GC-OP should be considered not only for postmenopausal females, but also for osteopenic premenopausal females and for males put on a daily dose of at least 7.5 mg equivalent prednisolone that is expected to last at least 3 months. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as exercise and avoidance of tobacco and alcohol, should be recommended, even if their role is not definitely settled in GC-OP prevention. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D should be considered as the first-line therapy because of the decrease in intestinal calcium absorption provoked by GCs. They also could be considered either as isolated therapy in patients taking less than 7.5 mg prednisolone daily and/or for a predicted period shorter than 3 months or as adjuvant therapy to other more potent drugs. Hormone replacement therapy could be considered in young postmenopausal females on GC, such as in postmenopausal OP, or in men with low androgen levels. Calcitonin appears to have a protective effect on trabecular bone in GC-OP, just as in postmenopausal OP. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the antifracture efficacy of bisphosphonates, notably alendronate and risedronate. Preventative and curative therapy of GC-OP should be maintained as long as the patient is on GC treatment and could be stopped after weaning from GC, because there is more than circumstantial evidence of some recovery of BMD when GCs are stopped. There is no indication in GC-OP for any combination of two antiresorptive agents (except for calcium and vitamin D) or for an antiresorptive and an anabolic agent. There is indeed no proof that the increased costs of combined treatments will translate into increased therapeutic efficacy.

In whom and how to prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid use is widespread in medicine. While it is often life-saving, side-effects are well known. The most common side-effect is osteoporosis. Today we have therapies with proven efficacy for the prevention of vertebral fractures and bone loss. Consequently recognition of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is extremely important given the availability of effective therapy.

Histomorphometric analysis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Bone histomorphometry or quantitative histology consists of counting or measuring tissue components: cells, extracellular constituents and microarchitecture. Bone histomorphometry is the only method that allows the measurement of mineralization rate and the study of bone formation at three levels: cell, remodeling unit and tissue levels. It is a useful tool to explain the pathogenesis and cellular mechanisms of different metabolic bone diseases such as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO). Glucocorticoids (GC) affect calcium and bone metabolism at every level, but the main effect is the osteoblastic dysfunction. Concerning the bone formation, some histomorphometric studies have shown a depressed osteoblastic activity at a cell, bone remodeling unit, and tissue levels. In addition, there is evidence of a shortening of the period in which the osteoblasts work actively forming the bone matrix. This latter effect seems to occur after high cumulative doses of GC. With regard to the resorption, the results are still debated, but histomorphometric parameters seem to be increased in the majority of studies, at least in the first period of the GC treatment. From a structural point of view, GC seem to induce a thinning of the trabeculae without their perforation, which occurs only after high cumulative doses. Anti-resorptive treatments, such as bisphosphonates, are able to counteract the negative effects of GC on bone. In particular, along with their active working period, they prolong the lifespan of osteoblasts and osteocytes. In addition, the anti-resorptive treatments seem to extend the time for secondary mineralization through a reduction of the Activation Frequency. The latter is an intriguing mechanism of bisphosphonates in GIO that needs further ad hoc investigations.

Bone mineral density of Brazilian girls with juvenile dermatomyositis

We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in girls with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) considering multiple factors in order to determine if it could be used as a predictor of reduction in bone mass. A cross-sectional study of lumbar spine BMD (L2-L4) was conducted on 10 girls aged 7-16 years with JDM. A group of 20 age-matched healthy girls was used as control. Lumbar spine BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Weight, height and pubertal Tanner stage were determined in all patients and controls. Duration of disease and mean daily and cumulative steroid doses were calculated for all patients on the basis of their medical charts. JDM activity was determined on the basis of the presence of muscle weakness, cutaneous vasculitis and/or elevation of serum concentration of one or more skeletal muscle enzymes. Seven patients demonstrated osteopenia or osteoporosis. Lumbar BMD was significantly lower in the JDM patients than the age-matched healthy control girls (0.712 vs 0.878, respectively; Student t-test, P = 0.041). No significant correlation between BMD and age, height, Tanner stage, disease duration, corticosteroid use, or disease activity was observed in JDM girls, but a correlation was observed between BMD and weight (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.802). Patients with JDM may be at risk for a significant reduction in BMD that might contribute to further skeletal fragility. Our results suggest that reduced bone mass in JDM may be related to other intrinsic mechanisms in addition to steroid treatment and some aspects of the disease itself may contribute to this condition.

Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with active vitamin D3 analogues: a review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including organ transplantation studies

The aim of this review with meta-analysis was to determine if there is a rationale to use activated forms of vitamin D3 to treat or prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and to compare the effect of active vitamin D3 metabolites with that of other anti-osteoporosis therapies. We performed a systemic search using MEDLINE/PubMed (1966-2003). Animal studies and clinical trials involving humans with data on therapy to treat or prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with active vitamin D3 analogues were included. Animal studies and basic research studies with active vitamin D3 were reviewed (qualitative review). Meta-analysis (quantitative review) on clinical trials (including organ transplantation studies) was performed with percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density or bone mineral content as the primary outcome measure; the secondary outcome measure was incidence of vertebral fractures. Fifty-four articles were found. Animal and basic research studies showed that active vitamin D3 analogues can inhibit bone loss during treatment with glucocorticoids. Concerning the effect on bone mineral density, the pooled effect size of active vitamin D3 analogues compared with no treatment, placebo, plain vitamin D3 and/or calcium was 0.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18, 0.52). Compared with bisphosphonates, the pooled effect size was -1.03 (95% CI -1.71, -0.36). The pooled estimate of the relative risk for vertebral fractures of active vitamin D3 analogues compared with no treatment, placebo, plain vitamin D3 and/or calcium was 0.56 (95% CI 0.34, 0.92) and compared with bisphosphonates it was 1.20 (95% CI 0.32, 4.55). Active vitamin D3 analogues not only preserve bone during glucocorticoid therapy more effectively than no treatment, placebo, plain vitamin D3 and/or calcium, but are also more effective in decreasing the risk of vertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates, however, are more effective in preserving bone and decreasing the risk of vertebral fractures than active vitamin D3 analogues.

The treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid use results in an increase risk for fractures. Over the past 10 years, we have a greater understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. This article reviews these recent findings and selective practice guidelines.

Urolithiasis in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We evaluated the incidence, timing, and consequences of urolithiasis in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A total of 20 patients with urolithiasis were identified from 2095 patients with ALL treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital on consecutive protocols between 1968 and 1998. For remission induction therapy, all patients received daily prednisone; continuation chemotherapy regimens differed by protocol with some including pulses of prednisone or dexamethasone and others no glucocorticoid. Patients with urolithiasis were older at diagnosis of ALL than those without urolithiasis (median age, 7.5 vs 5.0 years; P=0.03) and less likely to be black (P=0.03) than white or Hispanic, but sex and treatment era did not differ. Presenting symptoms included abdominal or flank pain, hematuria, and dysuria. All stones analyzed biochemically were calcium stones. The incidence of urolithiasis after completion of therapy was 1.8 per 10 000 person-years. Compared to this baseline rate, the relative risk of urolithiasis was 45 (P<0.01) during induction therapy, 22 (P<0.01) during continuation therapy with glucocorticoids, and 5.1 (P>0.05) during continuation therapy without glucocorticoids. Urolithiasis occurred 4.5 times more often during continuation treatment with glucocorticoids than without (P<0.05). Seven patients (35%) had recurrent urolithiasis. Patients with ALL are at risk of developing calcium renal stones during chemotherapy, especially when a glucocorticoid is included.

Endocrine complications in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Endocrine complications of therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are common and are potentially debilitating both during and after therapy. Growth velocity slows during therapy for ALL, especially during the first year; however, children who do not receive cranial irradiation usually reach normal adult height. While growth hormone deficiency generally occurs in patients who have received 24Gy of cranial irradiation, it may also develop in those treated with lower doses (18Gy) of cranial radiation or with only high-dose methotrexate. Obesity commonly occurs during therapy and persists after completion of therapy. Osteopenia can occur early during therapy for ALL and can persist for many years. Adrenal insufficiency should be suspected in any child who has recently received glucocorticoid therapy, and stress doses of steroid should be administered in the event of metabolic stress. Screening of urine is useful for early detection of hyperglycemia during therapy with glucocorticoids and L-asparaginase. The syndrome of inappropriate secretion of anti-diuretic hormone is usually associated with vincristine therapy and may be aggravated by concurrent use of azole antifungals. Finally, patients who have received 18 or 24Gy of cranial irradiation may have clinical or subclinical deficiencies of thyroid hormones.

Bone mineral density in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus

We evaluated spine bone mineral density (BMD) in Brazilian children with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) in order to detect potential predictors of reduction in bone mass. A cross-sectional study of BMD at the lumbar spine level (L2-L4) was conducted on 16 female JSLE patients aged 6-17 years. Thirty-two age-matched healthy girls were used as control. BMD at the lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Weight, height and pubertal Tanner stage were determined in patients and controls. Disease duration, mean daily steroid doses, mean cumulative steroid doses and JSLE activity measured by the systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) were determined for all JSLE patients based on their medical charts. All parameters were used as potential determinant factors for bone loss. Lumbar BMD tended to be lower in the JSLE patients, however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). No significant correlation was observed in JSLE girls between BMD and age, height, Tanner stage, disease duration, corticosteroid use or disease activity. We found a weak correlation between BMD and weight (r = 0.672). In the JSLE group we found no significant parameters to correlate with reduced bone mass. Disease activity and mean cumulative steroid doses were not related to BMD values. We did not observe reduced bone mass in female JSLE.

The comparative efficacy of drug therapies used for the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-regression

We determined the comparative efficacy of vitamin D, calcitonin, fluoride, and bisphosphonates for the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis using meta-regression models. A systematic search for trials was conducted using MEDLINE, bibliographic references, abstracts from national meetings, and contact with pharmaceutical companies and content experts. We included all randomized controlled trials, lasting at least 6 months, of adult patients on oral corticosteroids that evaluated treatment comparisons between vitamin D, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or fluoride either with no therapy/calcium or with each other and that reported extractable results. The outcome measure of interest was change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 45 eligible trials, which provided 49 eligible treatment comparisons (some trials had three arms or more). Our results indicated that bisphosphonates were the most effective class (effect size 1.03; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.17); results were similar even when newer generations of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates were excluded from analysis. We found the efficacy of bisphosphonates was enhanced further when used in combination with vitamin D (effect size, 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.50). Vitamin D and calcitonin were more effective than no therapy/calcium (effect size, 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.62; and effect size, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.67, respectively) and were of similar efficacy, but both were significantly less effective than bisphosphonates. Fluoride appeared effective, but there were too few studies (n = 5) to draw robust conclusions regarding its efficacy compared with the other three therapies. In summary, bisphosphonates are the most effective of evaluated agents for managing corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. The efficacy of bisphosphonates is enhanced further with concomitant use of vitamin D.

Corticosteroid-Induced osteoporosis: detection and management

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is a major cause of morbidity and is the leading secondary cause of osteoporosis today. Unfortunately, despite this knowledge, patients receiving corticosteroid therapy are often not offered any preventative treatment. Recent research has focused attention on the critical role the osteoblast has played in the pathophysiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. In addition to an initial increase in bone resorption, there is evidence that corticosteroids induce osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis and as a result are important contributors to bone loss. Interesting work has suggested that the bisphosphonates and calcitonin may help to prevent osteoblast apoptosis from occurring. Large scale randomised controlled trials have also been completed with a variety of therapeutic agents. Of the many different therapies, it is now clear that the bisphosphonates have the greatest evidence to support their use. Increases in bone mineral density when compared with a control group, not only at the spine but also at the hip, have been demonstrated. These studies have shown clinically significant reductions in vertebral fracture rates seen for the most part in postmenopausal women. Other therapies may well be effective, as evidenced by maintenance of bone mass in the spine; however, maintenance of bone mass in the hip and reductions in fracture rate have yet to be demonstrated for many of these therapies. Given our current knowledge and the evidence that is outlined in this review, it is hoped that patients who require therapy with corticosteroids for more than 3 months will be offered appropriate preventative treatment.

Corticosteroid-Induced Osteoporosis

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is the leading cause of secondary osteoporosis and a significant cause of morbidity in both men and women. Long-term use of even low-dose corticosteroids has been associated with increased risk of bone loss. Recent large randomized controlled trials have generated new knowledge on treatment strategies for patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. However, the majority of individuals receiving corticosteroids are not receiving prophylaxis for osteoporosis. Calcium and vitamin D should be recommended to patients initiating therapy with corticosteroids (and should be adequate for those receiving corticosteroids for less than 3 months). For those receiving corticosteroids for greater than 3 months, bisphosphonates are the therapy of choice, with both alendronate (alendronic acid) and risedronate (risedronic acid) approved by the US FDA for use in this indication. Calcitonin can be considered a second-line agent and should be reserved for patients who are intolerant of bisphosphonates or who are experiencing pain from a vertebral fracture. Hormone replacement therapy or testosterone therapy may be offered to those individuals on long-term corticosteroid treatment who are hypogonadal. Teriparatide (recombinant human parathyroid hormone 1-34) shows promise as a future anabolic agent for the prevention and treatment of patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Alendronate for the prevention of bone loss in patients on inhaled steroid therapy

One hundred women on inhaled steroid therapy (dose range from 800 to <1600 microg per day) were randomized to receive 10 mg of oral alendronate or placebo (with 500 mg of calcium in the form of daily calcium carbonate). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The percentage changes in BMD were -0.80% in the placebo group and 2.99% in the alendronate group at the spine (p < 0.001 by analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]), and were -0.51% in the placebo group and 0.97% in the alendronate group at the femoral neck (p < 0.05 by ANCOVA). Five patients in the alendronate-treated group, and a similar number of patients in the placebo group, complained of mild gastric discomfort. We conclude that women on inhaled steroid therapy were at risk of accelerated bone loss, which could be prevented by a daily dose of 10 mg of alendronate.

An update on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

In general, bone loss from glucocorticoid treatment occurs rapidly within the first 6 months of therapy. Glucocorticoids alter bone metabolism by multiple pathways; however, the bone loss is greatest in areas rich in trabecular bone. Preventive measures should be initiated early. It is the author's opinion that all subjects initiating treatment with prednisone at 7.5 mg or greater require calcium supplementation (diet plus supplement) at a dose of 1500 mg and vitamin D at a dose of 400 to 800 IU/d. If the patient is going to remain on this dose of glucocorticoid for more than 4 weeks, an antiresorptive agent should be started (e.g., estrogen, bisphosphonate, raloxifene). If a patient has established osteoporosis and is either initiating glucocorticoid therapy or is chronically treated with prednisone at 5 mg d or greater in addition to calcium and vitamin D supplementation, a potent antiresorptive agent (bisphosphonate) should be started. A bone mineral density measurement of either the lumbar spine or the hip may be helpful is assessing an individual's risk of osteoporosis, may improve compliance with treatment, and can be used to monitor the efficacy of the prescribed therapy. There is no reason to withhold treatment for glucocorticoid-induced bone loss until a bone mass measurement is taken, however. In motivated patients, a weight-bearing and resistance exercise program should be prescribed to help retain muscle strength and prevent depression. If hypercalciuria develops with glucocorticoid use, either thiazide diuretics or sodium restriction may be helpful. In patients who continue to lose bone or experience fracture's despite antiresorptive therapy while on glucocorticoids, bone-building anabolic agents (e.g., hPTH 1-34 or PTH 1-84) may be available someday soon.

Positive effect of etidronate therapy is maintained after drug is terminated in patients using corticosteroids

Following a 52-wk randomized controlled trial of intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy in patients using corticosteroids, we performed a 52-wk open-label trial of calcium alone in 114 corticosteroid-treated patients to determine whether the beneficial effect of etidronate is maintained after the drug is discontinued. All patients were given 500 mg/d of elemental calcium. Sixty-one and 53 patients made up the former placebo and etidronate groups, respectively. A total of 89 (98%) of patients in the former placebo and etidronate groups remained on corticosteroids throughout the second year. The mean (SE) percentage change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter were compared between groups. The difference between groups in mean percentage change from baseline (wk 0, initiation of etidronate or placebo therapy) in the bone density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, following 104 wk, was 3.8 (0.9), 3.0 (1.1), and 4.3 (1.1), respectively (p < 0.05, all sites), in favor of the former etidronate group. While not significant, the former placebo group demonstrated a slightly larger rate of decline in bone density over the second year than the former etidronate group at all three sites. Following the discontinuation of etidronate therapy, there was no accelerated bone loss and there was evidence of a residual protective effect in both the lumbar spine and femoral neck for up to 1 yr posttreatment.

Osteoporosis. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment in older adults

Osteoporosis is a major cause of disability and excess mortality in older men and women. Hip fracture incidence accelerates approximately 10 years after menopause in women and after age 70 in men. Approximately 1 million Americans suffer fragility fractures each year at a cost of over 14 billion dollars. The disability, mortality, and cost of hip and vertebral fractures are substantial in the rapidly growing, aging population so that prevention of osteoporosis is a major public health concern. BMD is used to make the diagnosis of osteoporosis before incident fracture and predict fracture risk. Recommendations for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis based on BMD score have been published by the World Health Organization and the National Osteoporosis Foundation. In a process that continues throughout life, bone repairs itself by the coupled action of bone resorption followed by bone formation, sometimes referred to as bone turnover. Osteoblasts and osteoclasts are the primary cells involved in bone formation and resorption, respectively. The process of bone turnover is regulated by hormones, such as PIH and local factors such as IL-1 and prostaglandins. Following attainment of peak bone mass at age 25, bone loss begins, accelerates in women at menopause and slows again but continues into advanced years at a rate of 1% to 2% per year, similar to premenopausal bone loss rate. The leading theories of the mechanism of bone loss in older individuals is calcium deficiency leading to secondary hyperparathyroidism and sex hormone deficiency. Risk factors such as age, gender, ethnic background, smoking, exercise, and nutrition, and medical conditions associated with osteoporosis should be evaluated and modified when possible to prevent further bone loss. Osteoporosis treatment and prevention include weight-bearing exercise, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, estrogen replacement, bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor antagonists, and calcitonin. Although there is no currently approved treatment for osteoporosis in men, many of the treatments approved for osteoporosis in women hold promise to be beneficial in men.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid drugs interact with bone metabolism at many levels, but their principal action is to reduce osteoblast number and bone matrix synthesis. Virtually all patients receiving glucocorticoids in doses above 5 mg per day lose bone, the amount lost being dependent on the cumulative steroid dose. The risk of fracture is also related to the individual's initial bone density, which in turn reflects race, sex, age, menopausal status, body weight, smoking and the nature of any underlying illness. Bone density measurement and personal fracture history are the best predictors of future fracture risk. Steroid-induced bone loss is reversible, so measures to minimize the systemic steroid dose or to withdraw these drugs altogether should be pursued no matter how long an individual has been using them. Increasing the calcium intake to 1.5 g per day, encouraging them to stop smoking and take more exercise, and treating any vitamin D deficiency are sensible measures in all patients. In those at high risk, bisphosphonates are the best documented interventions, although sex hormone replacement is also effective and can be used alone or in addition to bisphosphonates.

Steroid-induced osteoporosis in systemic lupus erythematosus

The patient with SLE is at considerable risk of osteoporosis, because of the inflammatory disease itself, its consequences, and its treatments. Because of their extensive use, glucocorticoids are thought to be the most frequent cause of drug-related osteoporosis and may be responsible for much of the bone loss in lupus. This article focuses on the mechanisms of steroid-induced osteoporosis in SLE and outlines strategies for prevention and treatment.

Effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and calcium carbonate on bone loss associated with long-term renal transplantation

To investigate the effect of calcitriol plus calcium carbonate on the bone loss associated with long-term renal transplantation, 30 patients with serum creatinine levels less than 2.0 mg/dL were randomly allocated to a control (n = 14) or treatment group (n = 16) and studied with bone biopsy and densitometry at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Calcitriol (0.25 microg/d) plus calcium carbonate (500 mg/d of elemental calcium) were administered to patients in the treatment group. Comparing the baseline and final data of each group at a time, no change in bone mineral density (BMD) z score was observed at the distal radius (control, -0.8 +/- 0.8 versus -0.6 +/- 0.9; treatment, -1.0 +/- 1.0 versus -1.0 +/- 1.1). However, a significant increase (P < 0.05) was found at the lumbar spine in both groups (control, 0.1 +/- 1.6 versus 0.4 +/- 1.6; treatment, -0.1 +/- 1.5 versus 0.3 +/- 1.5) and only in the treatment group at the femoral neck (control, -0.9 +/- 1.0 versus -0.8 +/- 1.0; treatment, -0.5 +/- 0.9 versus -0.3 +/- 1.1). When BMD was compared between groups, no significant differences were observed at the evaluated anatomic sites at baseline or after 1 year of follow-up. After 1 year of follow-up, adjusting for age and sex (z score), the control group showed a trend to reduce the value of several histomorphometric parameters, including osteoblast surface (-2.2 +/- 6.1 versus -3.4 +/- 3.9), osteoid surface (-2.3 +/- 3.5 versus -3.1 +/- 3.9), and osteoclast surface (0.2 +/- 5.0 versus -1.3 +/- 3.3). Consequently, there was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in mineralizing surface (-9.8 +/- 11.0 versus -15.8 +/- 12.3) and appositional rate (-5.8 +/- 2.7 versus -7.6 +/- 2.2). In the treatment group, a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in osteoclast surface was observed at the end of the study (3.9 +/- 6.8 versus -1.2 +/- 4.1), and although a trend to reduce osteoblast surface (-2.5 +/- 2.6 versus -3.2 +/- 5.7) and osteoid surface (-2.1 +/- 2.5 versus -3.2 +/- 2.8) was also found, patients maintained approximately the same level of wall thickness (-5.2 +/- 5.3 versus -5.3 +/- 3.3) and bone volume (-2.7 +/- 1.8 versus -2.5 +/- 1.7). However, there was no improvement in mineralizing surface (-4.2 +/- 2.9 versus -10.4 +/- 3.6) or appositional rate (-5.8 +/- 3.1 versus -8.1 +/- 2.6). No significant differences in bone histomorphometric variables were observed between groups after 1 year of follow-up. In conclusion, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and calcium carbonate did not significantly improve bone loss in long-term renal transplant recipients. However, significant osteoclast suppression and a trend to maintain trabecular bone volume and wall thickness as well as improve the axial BMD were observed in the treatment group.

Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To educate scientists and health care providers about the effects of corticosteroids on bone, and advise clinicians of the appropriate treatments for patients receiving corticosteroids.

METHODS

This review summarizes the pathophysiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, describes the assessment methods used to evaluate this condition, examines the results of clinical trials of drugs, and explores a practical approach to the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis based on data collected from published articles.

RESULTS

Despite our lack of understanding about the biological mechanisms leading to corticosteroid-induced bone loss, effective therapy has been developed. Bisphosphonate therapy is beneficial in both the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. The data for the bisphosphonates are more compelling than for any other agent. For patients who have been treated but continue to lose bone, hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or anabolic hormones should be considered. Calcium should be used only as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment or prevention of corticosteroid-induced bone loss and should be administered in combination with other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates have shown significant treatment benefit and are the agents of choice for both the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Calcium and vitamin D for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of calcium and vitamin D compared to calcium alone or placebo in the prevention of bone loss in patients taking systemic corticosteroids.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal trials register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE and Medline up to 1996. We also conducted a hand search of abstracts from various scientific meetings and reference lists of selected trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized trials comparing calcium and vitamin D to calcium alone or placebo in patients taking systemic corticosteroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was abstracted from trials by two investigators. Methodological quality was assessed in a similar manner. Analysis was performed using fixed effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials were included, with 274 patients. The analysis was performed at two years after starting calcium and vitamin D. There was a significant weighted mean difference (WMD) between treatment and control groups in lumbar (WMD 2.6 (95% CI 0.7, 4.5), and radial bone mineral density (WMD 2.5 (95% CI 0.6, 4.4). The other outcome measures (femoral neck bone mass, fracture incidence, biochemical markers of bone resorption) were not significantly different.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant prevention of bone loss at the lumbar spine and forearm with vitamin D and calcium in corticosteroid treated patients. Because of low toxicity and cost all patients being started on corticosteroids should receive prophylactic therapy with calcium and vitamin D.

Osteopenia in young hypogonadal women with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving chronic steroid therapy: a randomized controlled trial comparing calcitriol and hormonal replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of calcitriol and hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of steroid-induced osteoporosis in hypogonadal women.

METHODS

We studied 28 young patients (aged 37 +/- 6 yr) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on chronic steroid therapy for 130 +/- 22 months and requiring more than 10 mg/day prednisone. They were amenorrhoeic for more than 2 yr with proven ovarian failure. All had osteopenia with a T score at L2-4 of less than -1. They were randomized to receive HRT (conjugated oestrogen 0.625 mg daily from day 1 to day 21 plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg daily days 10-21) or calcitriol 0.5 microg daily. All received calcium carbonate 1 g/day.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the baseline demographic, bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical data between the two groups. Lumbar spine BMD increased by 2.0 +/- 0.4% after 2 yr with HRT (P<0.05), but reduced by 1.74 +/- 0.4% (P<0.05) with calcitriol treatment. No change was seen at the distal one-third radius with HRT treatment but significant bone loss (2.3 +/- 1.4%, P<0.02) was observed with calcitriol therapy. BMD at the hip did not change in both groups. Comparing both treatment groups, significant differences in the BMD at the spine (P<0.03) and radius (P<0.05) were seen at the end of 2 yr. The changes in urinary n-telopeptide excretion but not serum osteocalcin at 6 months and 12 months were inversely correlated with the changes in lumbar spine BMD at 24 months. HRT did not cause an adverse effect on SLE disease activity.

CONCLUSION

HRT but not calcitriol could prevent bone loss in young hypogonadal women on chronic steroid therapy.

Prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: provider practice at an urban county hospital

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the frequency and types of prophylaxis for osteoporosis that were prescribed to outpatients who were receiving chronic glucocorticoid treatment and to identify the patient and provider characteristics that were associated with the use of prophylaxis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We identified 215 adult outpatients at San Francisco General Hospital who had received a prescription for prednisone (or its equivalent) at a daily dose of at least 5 mg for at least 1 month. Patient demographic characteristics, the diagnosis for which glucocorticoids were prescribed, comorbid illnesses, and medications were determined by chart review. Characteristics of the patients who were prescribed prophylaxis were compared with those of patients who were not prescribed prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Prophylaxis for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis was prescribed to 58% of patients. Patients prescribed prophylaxis were older (mean [+/-SD] age of 50.0 +/- 13.9 versus 44.5 +/- 13.6 years, P = 0.004), more likely to be female (69% versus 40%, P <0.0001), postmenopausal if female (84% versus 56%, P = 0.002), have more comorbid illnesses (63% versus 29%, P = 0.001), and take multiple medications (66% versus 45%, P = 0.002). Patients attending the rheumatology clinic were 1.6 times more likely to receive prophylaxis than those attending other clinics (P <0.0001). The strongest predictor of prophylaxis was postmenopausal state. In premenopausal women, the independent predictors of prophylaxis were being treated in the rheumatology clinic and the presence of comorbid illnesses, whereas comorbid illnesses was the only independent predictor of prophylaxis in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational efforts should be directed toward increasing awareness of the importance of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and its prevention.

Metabolic bone disease in adults with inflammatory bowel disease

Bone loss is seen frequently in those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It appears to be more common in those with Crohn's disease than in those with ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids play an important role in the development of osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis in IBD, the effects of corticosteroids on bone metabolism, and treatment options are reviewed.

The role of vitamin D in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analytic approach

OBJECTIVE

To determine if vitamin D is more effective than no therapy or calcium alone in the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, and to determine how vitamin D compares with other osteoporosis therapies, e.g., bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or fluoride, for this condition.

METHODS

We evaluated all formulations of vitamin D, including its active metabolites and analogs. A systematic search for published and unpublished studies was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-December 1997), bibliographic references, abstracts from proceedings of recent national meetings, and contact with pharmaceutical companies and content experts. We included all randomized controlled trials lasting at least 6 months (and reporting extractable results), of patients receiving oral corticosteroids, that compared vitamin D with either 1) no therapy or calcium alone, or 2) bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or fluoride. The primary outcome measure of interest was change in lumbar spine bone mineral density.

RESULTS

We found a moderate beneficial effect of vitamin D plus calcium versus no therapy or calcium alone (9 trials) (effect size 0.60; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.34, 0.85; P < 0.0001). In comparisons of vitamin D with other osteoporosis therapies, bisphosphonates were more effective than vitamin D (6 trials) (effect size 0.57; 95% CI 0.09, 1.05). Calcitonin was similar in efficacy to vitamin D (4 trials) (effect size 0.03; 95% CI -0.39, 0.45). Fluoride was more effective than vitamin D, but there were only 2 trials.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D plus calcium is superior to no therapy or calcium alone in the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Vitamin D is less effective than some osteoporosis therapies. Therefore, treatment with vitamin D plus calcium, as a minimum, should be recommended to patients receiving long-term corticosteroids.

Delayed pubertal growth spurt and normal adult height attainment in boys receiving long-term alternate-day prednisone therapy

Statural growth to age > or = 20 years was studied in 10 boys with glomerulonephritis who received alternate-day prednisone (mean 1.2 mg/kg) for at least 2 consecutive years during pubertal age. Peak growth velocity was delayed after age 15 years in six patients and it was less than 7 cm/year in five. However, after age 16, growth velocity was significantly (p = 0.02) higher than expected and allowed patients to ultimately reach their genetic height potential.

Cyclical etidronate increases bone density in the spine and hip of postmenopausal women receiving long term corticosteroid treatment. A double blind, randomised placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of cyclic etidronate in secondary prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis.

METHODS

A double blind, randomised placebo controlled study comparing cyclic etidronate and placebo during two years in 37 postmenopausal women receiving long term corticosteroid treatment, mainly for polymyalgia rheumatica (40% of the patients) and rheumatoid arthritis (30%). Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter.

RESULTS

After two years of treatment there was a significant difference between the groups in mean per cent change from baseline in bone density in the spine in favour of etidronate (p = 0.003). The estimated treatment difference (mean (SD)) was 9.3 (2.1)%. Etidronate increased bone density in the spine (4.9 (2.1)%, p < 0.05) whereas the placebo group lost bone (-2.4 (1.6)%). At the femoral neck there was an estimated difference of 5.3 (2.6)% between the groups (etidronate: 3.6% (1.4)%, p < 0.05, placebo: -2.4 (2.1)%). The estimated difference at the trochanter was 8.2 (3.0) (etidronate: 9.0 (1.5)%, p < 0.0001, placebo: 0.5 (2.3)%). No significant bone loss occurred in the hip in placebo treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclic etidronate is an effective treatment for postmenopausal women receiving corticosteroid treatment and is well tolerated.

Effects of short-term treatment with prednisolone and calcitriol on bone and mineral metabolism in normal men

To study the effects of treatment with glucocorticoid and calcitriol on biochemical markers of calcium and bone metabolism, 48 normal male volunteers (aged 21-54 years) were randomized to treatment for 7 days with either (A) prednisolone, 10 mg twice daily, (B) prednisolone, 10 mg twice daily, and calcitriol, 1 microg twice daily, (C) calcitriol 1 mg twice daily, or (D) placebo. The study period was 28 days. Renal calcium excretion increased (mean maximal increase +44.7%, p < 0.01) as well as serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) (max. +18.5%, p < 0.01) during prednisolone treatment. Concomitant treatment with calcitriol or calcitriol alone equally enhanced renal calcium excretion (max. +185.2%, p < 0.001) and decreased serum PTH (max. -43.1%, p < 0.001). Prednisolone administration was followed by prompt declines in markers of bone formation [serum osteocalcin (max. -34.7%, p < 0.001) and serum procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide (PICP) (max. -25.9%, p < 0.05)], whereas serum bone alkaline phosphatase (bone AP) remained unchanged. Calcitriol in combination with prednisolone attenuated the decrease in PICP (max. -8.9%, not significant), but it had no effect on osteocalcin (max. -40.1%, p < 0.001), and decreased bone AP (max. -22.2%, p < 0.05). Calcitriol alone increased osteocalcin (max. +37.8%, p < 0.03) and PICP (max. +26.0%, p < 0.05). Among markers of bone degradation, prednisolone suppressed serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) (max. -28.4%, p < 0.001), but not the fasting renal excretion of hydroxyproline (OHP) and collagen type I N-terminal telopeptide (NTx). Calcitriol partially antagonized the decrease in ICTP (max. -17.2%, p < 0.001). Calcitriol alone had no effect on resorptive markers. Extraosseous matrix synthesis was suppressed by prednisolone evaluated by serum procollagen type III N-terminal propeptide (max. -30.8%, p < 0.001) and was not affected by concomitant treatment with calcitriol or calcitriol alone. In conclusion, short-term administration of prednisolone to healthy men leads to fast and protracted suppression of biochemical markers of bone formation and extraosseous connective tissue metabolism. The effect on bone was partially antagonized by simultaneous calcitriol treatment, and points toward a potential role of calcitriol in the prevention of steroid induced osteoporosis.

Alendronate for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Intervention Study Group

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a common complication of long-term glucocorticoid therapy for which there is no well-proved preventive or restorative treatment.

METHODS

We carried out two 48-week, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of two doses of alendronate in 477 men and women, 17 to 83 years of age, who were receiving glucocorticoid therapy. The primary end point was the difference in the mean percent change in lumbar-spine bone density from base line to week 48 between the groups. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone density of the hip, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SE) bone density of the lumbar spine increased by 2.1+/-0.3 percent and 2.9+/-0.3 percent, respectively, in the groups that received 5 and 10 mg of alendronate per day (P<0.001) and decreased by 0.4+/-0.3 percent in the placebo group. The femoral-neck bone density increased by 1.2+/-0.4 percent and 1.0+/-0.4 percent in the respective alendronate groups (P<0.01) and decreased by 1.2+/-0.4 percent in the placebo group (P<0.01). The bone density of the trochanter and total body also increased significantly in the patients treated with alendronate. There were proportionally fewer new vertebral fractures in the alendronate groups (overall incidence, 2.3 percent) than in the placebo group (3.7 percent) (relative risk, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 4.4). Markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in the alendronate groups (P<0.001). There were no differences in serious adverse effects among the three groups, but there was a small increase in nonserious upper gastrointestinal effects in the group receiving 10 mg of alendronate.

CONCLUSIONS

Alendronate increases bone density in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy.

The science and therapy of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss

Glucocorticoids are critical in the management of chronic, noninfectious, inflammatory diseases. Bone loss is a most devastating side effect of these powerful medications. Glucocorticoids produce bone loss by altering calcium metabolism, suppressing gonadal hormone production, and inhibiting bone formation. Now that the mechanism of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss is understood and effective medications are available, this disease can be prevented and reversed.