A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of anti-CD5 immunoconjugate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Xoma RA Investigator Group

CD5 blockade, a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor, enhances T cell anti-tumour immunity and delays tumour growth in mice harbouring poorly immunogenic 4T1 breast tumour homografts

CD5 is a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich superfamily that is expressed on T cells and a subset of B cells (B1a) cell and can regulate the T cell receptor signaling pathway. Blocking CD5 function may have therapeutic potential in treatment of cancer by enhancing cytotoxic T lymphocyte recognition and ablation of tumour cells. The effect of administering an anti-CD5 antibody to block or reduce CD5 function as an immune checkpoint blockade to enhance T cell anti-tumour activation and function in vivo has not been explored. Here we challenged mice with poorly immunogenic 4T1 breast tumour cells and tested whether treatment with anti-CD5 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) in vivo could enhance non-malignant T cell anti-tumour immunity and reduce tumour growth. Treatment with anti-CD5 MAb resulted in an increased fraction of CD8+ T cells compared to CD4+ T cell in draining lymph nodes and the tumour microenvironment. In addition, it increased activation and effector function of T cells isolated from spleens, draining lymph nodes, and 4T1 tumours. Furthermore, tumour growth was delayed in mice treated with anti-CD5 MAb. These data suggest that use of anti-CD5 MAb as an immune checkpoint blockade can both enhance activation of T cells in response to poorly immunogenic antigens and reduce tumour growth in vivo. Exploration of anti-CD5 therapies in treatment of cancer, alone and in combination with other immune therapeutic drugs, is warranted.

Therapeutic human monoclonal antibodies in inflammatory diseases

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are antibodies of a single antigen specificity produced by identical immune cells, i.e., clones of a common germ cell. They offer unprecedented opportunities to drug development because of their ability to target almost any cell surface or secreted molecule with remarkable efficacy and safety. In this chapter, the application of human mAbs in the treatment of inflammatory diseases is reviewed. We discuss in detail several mAb-based drugs such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), anti-interleukin-1 (anti-IL-1) receptor, anti-IL-6 receptor, anti-α4 integrin subunit, and anti-CD20 agents, all of which have been documented by clinical trials to be efficacious and have been approved for the therapy of several inflammatory and immune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, spondyloarthropathies, juvenile arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and others. These novel drugs can be used either as a monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapeutic modalities, particularly if the disease under treatment is refractory to therapy using solely conventional techniques. As a large variety of mAb-based agents targeting a plethora of cytokines, chemokines, adhesion and co-stimulatory molecules, receptors, as well as diverse cell types, are presently under investigation, the therapeutic armamentarium of the clinician is expected to greatly broaden in the near future, providing improved patient care for a wide range of devastating diseases of our times.

The conserved scavenger receptor cysteine-rich superfamily in therapy and diagnosis

The scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) superfamily of soluble or membrane-bound protein receptors is characterized by the presence of one or several repeats of an ancient and highly conserved protein module, the SRCR domain. This superfamily (SRCR-SF) has been in constant and progressive expansion, now up to more than 30 members. The study of these members is attracting growing interest, which parallels that in innate immunity. No unifying function has been described to date for the SRCR domains, this being the result of the limited knowledge still available on the physiology of most members of the SRCR-SF, but also of the sequence versatility of the SRCR domains. Indeed, involvement of SRCR-SF members in quite different functions, such as pathogen recognition, modulation of the immune response, epithelial homeostasis, stem cell biology, and tumor development, have all been described. This has brought to us new information, unveiling the possibility that targeting or supplementing SRCR-SF proteins could result in diagnostic and/or therapeutic benefit for a number of physiologic and pathologic states. Recent research has provided structural and functional insight into these proteins, facilitating the development of means to modulate the activity of SRCR-SF members. Indeed, some of these approaches are already in use, paving the way for a more comprehensive use of SRCR-SF members in the clinic. The present review will illustrate some available evidence on the potential of well known and new members of the SRCR-SF in this regard.

Pharmacotherapy: concepts of pathogenesis and emerging treatments. Co-stimulation and T cells as therapeutic targets

Full activation and differentiation of resting T cells into effector T cells requires at least two signals, the first through engagement of the T cell antigen receptor (TCR) by the antigen-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and the second by engagement of co-stimulatory molecules such as CD28, on T cells by ligands such as CD80/86 on APCs. Effector T cell differentiation is associated with proliferation, secretion of cytokines and expression of additional surface molecules. These inducible structures may have stimulatory (ICOS, OX40 and 4-1BB) or inhibitory (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4) potential. To the extent that T cells have a role in particular immune-mediated diseases, interruption of T cell co-stimulation is a potentially worthwhile approach to the treatment of those conditions. This article summarises the experience in treating rheumatological disease by perturbation of T cell co-stimulation, and also describes structures that could be future targets for this type of therapeutic approach.

Toxin-based therapeutic approaches

Protein toxins confer a defense against predation/grazing or a superior pathogenic competence upon the producing organism. Such toxins have been perfected through evolution in poisonous animals/plants and pathogenic bacteria. Over the past five decades, a lot of effort has been invested in studying their mechanism of action, the way they contribute to pathogenicity and in the development of antidotes that neutralize their action. In parallel, many research groups turned to explore the pharmaceutical potential of such toxins when they are used to efficiently impair essential cellular processes and/or damage the integrity of their target cells. The following review summarizes major advances in the field of toxin based therapeutics and offers a comprehensive description of the mode of action of each applied toxin.

Spleen tyrosine kinase: a novel target for therapeutic intervention of rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

In the last few years, significant progress has been made in understanding the pathogenic mechanisms and in defining the role of relevant cells and molecules in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Various therapies, both biological (anti-TNF, anti-interleukins [e.g., IL-1]) and small molecule inhibitors have been explored for the treatment of RA.

OBJECTIVE

To date, no single signaling pathway inhibitor as wide acting as the corticosteroids, is known. However, treatment with corticosteroids is also associated with allied side effects. Despite a lot of efforts in the category of small molecule inhibitors, no inhibitor is available to deal with RA at both fronts (inflammation and tissue damage), without causing immense side effects.

METHOD

This present review explores the role of spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) in the pathogenesis of RA and also discusses how it may meet the present day therapeutic requirements for the treatment of RA. This review gives an in-depth discussion on the role of Syk signaling in RA, the possibilities of using Syk as a target and also discusses the possible side effects that could be associated with its inhibition.

CONCLUSION

We propose Syk inhibition as a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of RA.

Receptor-directed therapy of T-cell leukemias and lymphomas

T-Cell leukemias and lymphomas represent a less common and heterogeneous group of lymphoid neoplasms. Overall, they respond less well to chemotherapy and have a poorer prognosis than their B-cell counterparts. T-Cell tumors express a number of potential targets for receptor-directed antibody therapy; however, there is no available therapeutic monoclonal antibody for these diseases with comparable activity to that of rituximab in B-cell disorders. Despite this, alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody has demonstrated meaningful anti-tumor activity in a variety of T-cell malignancies. A number of other antibodies, modified antibodies and immunotoxins directed against targets such as CD2, CD4, CD5, CD25, CD30 and CD122 expressed on malignant T-cells are under investigation. The current status of receptor-directed antibody therapy for T-cell leukemia and lymphoma is reviewed.

Biologic therapies in rheumatology: lessons learned, future directions

During the past decade biologic therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins have revolutionized the management of rheumatic disease. By targeting key cytokines and immune cells biologics have provided more specific therapeutic interventions with less immunosuppression. Clinical use, however, has revealed that their theoretical simplicity hides a more complex reality. Efficacy, toxicity and even pharmacodynamic effects can deviate from those predicted, as poignantly illustrated by the catastrophic effects witnessed during the first-into-human administration of TGN1412. This review summarizes lessons gleaned from practical experience and discusses how these can inform future discovery and development of new biologic therapies for rheumatology.

Novel therapies for rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease that causes significant morbidity and mortality. The pathogenesis outlined to date in RA consists of a cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines leading to the recruitment of inflammatory cells and the self perpetuation of inflammation, ultimately leading to cartilage and bone destruction. The dramatic progress in understanding the molecular immunology in RA has led to a transition from conventional treatment with aggressive immune suppression to targeted biological-based therapies that control the inflammatory pathways associated with RA. This article reviews the current biological and small-molecule therapies approved for the treatment of RA and those in development, including antibodies, tolerising agents and vaccines.

Biological therapies directed against cells in autoimmune disease

Among the cells of the immune system involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease, T cells have received the most attention. The central role of these cells in several animal models of autoimmune diseases and in human disease counterparts has provided the rationale for specific therapeutic targeting of T cell subsets, especially CD4 T cells. So far, the applicability of this approach has not been clearly evident in clinical trials, which was also the case when nondepleting "coating" anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies was used. In the past several years, experimental evidence supporting a major role of B cells in systemic autoimmune disease has grown. This includes the pathogenicity of certain autoantibodies, the potential of B cells to present antigen in the context of MHC Class II and to signal via costimulatory molecules, and to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. In some instances, engagement of the B cell receptor and other surface receptors is sufficient to stimulate B cells to produce antibodies. The depletion of B cells by targeting the surface marker CD20 has been shown to be effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis with a good side effect profile. Series of cases with other systemic autoimmune diseases indicate that this strategy may be effective in these conditions too. The clinical data add weight to the importance of B cells in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases.

Synthesis of a novel family of diterpenes and their evaluation as anti-inflammatory agents

The synthesis and biological evaluation of a new family of diterpenes, represented by structures 2 and 3, is presented. These compounds constitute isomeric analogues of acanthoic acid (1) and were examined as potent anti-inflammatory agents. Among them, methyl ester 12 exhibited a low non-specific cytotoxicity, inhibited TNF-alpha synthesis and displayed good specificity in suppressing cytokine expression.

Therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritis

Recent years have seen considerable advances in our understanding of both the clinical and basic-research aspects of rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical progress has come from a better recognition of the natural history of the disease, the development and validation of outcome measures for clinical trials and, consequently, innovative trial designs. In parallel, basic research has provided clues to the pathogenic events underlying rheumatoid arthritis, and advances in biotechnology have facilitated the development of new classes of therapeutics. Here, we summarize the fruits of these advances: innovative approaches to the use of existing, traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; novel agents approved very recently; and further avenues that are presently under investigation or which are of more distant promise.

Abandoned therapies and unpublished trials in rheumatoid arthritis

The capability of selectively targeting pathogenic elements of disease with biologic therapies has created a new therapeutic repertoire. Although a substantial number of biologic agents have been developed for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, few have been approved for use. Most of the agents have failed to reach the approval stage because of inadequate clinical benefit. Despite this, studies of these agents have provided extremely valuable lessons in study design, immunobiology, pharmacodynamic evaluation, and the utility of animal models in the development of biologic agents. These insights have laid the groundwork for future development of other novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Monoclonal antibodies in immune and inflammatory diseases

The era of monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics has arrived. Monoclonal antibodies of high quality targeting almost any antigen can now be engineered and manufactured in large quantities. In the clinic, monoclonal antibodies are proving to be safe and effective for the treatment of a wide range of diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, spondyloarthropathies, psoriasis and allograft rejection.

High circulating levels of soluble scavenger receptors (sCD5 and sCD6) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the existence of circulating levels of soluble scavenger receptors (sCD5 and sCD6) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), and to analyse the correlation with clinical and immunological features of SS.

METHODS

Ninety consecutive patients with primary SS were studied. All patients fulfilled four or more of the European diagnostic criteria for SS. sCD5 and sCD6 levels were determined using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed in our laboratory.

RESULTS

Detectable levels of sCD5 were found in 39 (43%) SS patients. The mean+/-standard error values of sCD5 were 3.5+/-0.5 ng/ml for patients with SS and 1.9+/-0.1 ng/ml for healthy blood donors (P<0.001). We found higher levels of sCD5 in patients with hypocomplementaemia (6.5 vs 3.5 ng/ml, P=0.03) and cryoglobulinaemia (6.9 vs 2.6 ng/ml, P=0.001). On the other hand, detectable levels of sCD6 were found in 60 (67%) SS patients. The mean+/-standard error values of sCD6 were 25.5+/-7.8 ng/ml in SS patients and 5.27+/-1.40 ng/ml in healthy blood donors (P=0.01). When the sCD6 levels were compared according to the presence or absence of immunological features, patients with cryoglobulinaemia showed higher levels of circulating sCD6 (77.3 vs 17 ng/ml, P=0.01) than those without cryoglobulinaemia.

CONCLUSION

Patients with primary SS showed higher levels of circulating sCD5 and sCD6 when compared with controls. Moreover, the existence of some immunological features (hypocomplementaemia and cryoglobulinaemia) was associated with high levels of both soluble scavenger receptors. These facts may reflect an enhanced lymphocytic activation in patients with primary SS.

Potential biologic agents for treating rheumatoid arthritis

The encouraging clinical results observed in trials using anti-TNF therapy clearly warrant further studies to determine whether TNF inhibitors are capable of modifying the destructive component of this disease in long-term follow-up studies as well as to assess the safety of long-term use (see the article by Keystone in this issue). It is also reasonable to propose that interfering with the cytokine cascade earlier in the course of disease may be of even greater therapeutic benefit. As the pathogenetic mechanisms in RA are more clearly defined, especially in early disease and in those individuals destined to develop severe disease, the potential of other biologic agents to specifically inhibit these critical pathways may provide better treatments for our patients. Many potential targets in the immune-mediated process of RA are currently being rigorously evaluated in clinical trials. Use of combinations of biologic therapies, perhaps in human patients with RA, should be of considerable interest in future trials.

Biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis

Our growing understanding of the immune response mechanism has created a wave of novel biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The domain of biologic agents includes: 1) Recombinant regulatory cytokines; 2) engineered molecules and monoclonal antibodies that target proinflammatory cytokines; 3) monoclonal antibodies against lymphocyte cell-surface proteins; 4) fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies that block the second signal and induce anergy; 5) vaccines comprised of specific proteins from lymphocytes and antigen presenting cells; 6) monoclonal antibodies that block intercellular adhesion; and 6) gene therapy whereby antiarthritis genes are introduced directly into the joint. Most treatments remain under investigation; however, in 1998 two antagonists of tumor necrosis factor were approved marking the first approvals of antirheumatic biologic agents. For the first time anti-rheumatic therapies are being designed instead of borrowed.

The function of tumour necrosis factor and receptors in models of multi-organ inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease

There is now good evidence to demonstrate that aberrations in tumour necrosis factor (TNF) production in vivo may be either pathogenic or protective and several plausible mechanisms may explain these contrasting activities. According to the classic pro-inflammatory scenario, failure to regulate the production of TNF at a site of immunological injury may lead to chronic activation of innate immune cells and to chronic inflammatory responses, which may consequently lead to organ specific inflammatory pathology and tissue damage. However, more cryptic functions of this molecule may be considered to play a significant part in the development of TNF mediated pathologies. Direct interference of TNF with the differentiation, proliferation or death of specific pathogenic cell targets may be an alternative mechanism for disease initiation or progression. In addition to these activities, there is now considerable evidence to suggest that TNF may also directly promote or down regulate the adaptive immune response. A more complete understanding of the temporal and spatial context of TNF/TNF receptor (TNF-R) function and of the molecular and cellular pathways leading to the development of TNF/TNF-R mediated pathologies is necessary to fully comprehend relevant mechanisms of disease induction and progression in humans. In this paper, the potential pathogenic mechanisms exerted by TNF and receptors in models of multi-organ inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease are discussed. Elucidating the nature and level of contribution of these mechanisms in chronic inflammation and autoimmunity may lead to better regulatory and therapeutic applications.

T cells: pathogenic cells and therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To provide: 1) a brief review of current thought on the role of T cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and 2) To provide an overview of RA therapies directed against T cells.

METHODS

The following papers in relevant American and European medical journals were reviewed. Those related to: the role of T cells in the pathogenesis of RA; to biological therapy directed against cell surface markers specific to T cell populations implicated in RA; and to treatment of RA with cyclosporin A and leflunomide, pharmacological agents known to interfere with the T cell response to antigens.

RESULTS

Although a variety of cell types are now recognized as contributors to the progressive joint destruction that is a hallmark of RA, T cell activation is still thought to be a central event in the initiation and progression of this disease. As a result, various therapeutic options directed against T cells have been developed. These include biological agents directed against specific populations of activated T cells and pharmacological agents that have specific T cell-modulatory actions.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of T cell-directed biological therapies for RA has been disappointing, as a result of both lack of efficacy and serious toxicity. Treatment of RA with pharmacological agents that interfere with antigen-driven T cell proliferation has been more successful.

New therapeutic targets for rheumatoid arthritis

New insights into the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and consequently new targets of therapy are covered in a broad overview fashion. Short-term significant beneficial effect on RA disease activity has been established in a small but rapidly growing number of double-blind placebo-controlled trials now including recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, chimeric (mouse/human) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against TNF alpha (cA2), humanised (human/mouse) anti-TNF alpha mAb (CDP571) and recombinant human TNF-receptor-Fc fusion protein (TNFR:Fc). Placebo-controlled trials of anti-T cells agents such as chimeric anti-CD4 mAb (cM-T412) and anti-CD5 immunoconjugate, did not demonstrate clinical benefit. A placebo-controlled study of the anti-T cell derived cytokine IL-2 (DAB486IL-2) showed only modes clinical improvement. Other anti-T cell approaches such as autologous T cell vaccination and induction of tolerance by oral type II collagen have been unsuccessful. The one controlled trial with an anti-inflammatory cytokine, recombinant human IFN-gamma, showed modest clinical benefits. Controlled trials with IL-4 and IL-10 and with anti-adhesion molecules are awaited.

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Using their clinical pharmacological effects as a guide to their selection

Rheumatoid arthritis is a disease of unknown aetiology characterised by persistent joint swelling, functional disability and increased mortality. No curative therapy exists at present but some therapeutic agents, commonly referred to as disease-modifying drugs, offer the potential for suppression of the inflammatory activity and attenuation of the disease process. Since the precise mechanism of action of most disease modifying drugs is uncertain, the selection of a particular therapy must at present be based on the pharmacologic properties of each available agent, appropriately individualised for each clinical setting. The toxicity of disease-modifying agents often limits the dose and/or duration of therapy and makes careful monitoring mandatory. No consensus exists as to the order in which disease-modifying agents should be employed. Less toxic disease-modifying drugs such as auranofin, hydroxychloroquine, minocycline, and sulfasalazine are usually used in early and mild disease. Azathioprine, penicillamine (D-penicillamine), methotrexate and parenteral gold are usually considered to be more toxic and are most often used in the setting of progressive disease while the most toxic agents, such as chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide, are reserved for life-threatening manifestations such as vasculitis. Newer therapeutic approaches presently under study include the use of existing drugs in combination and novel biologic agents which selectively inhibit lymphocyte and cytokine activity. These strategies offer the hope of more efficacious and less toxic therapy in the future.

Biologic agents and immunotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Progress and perspective

Advances in our understanding of rheumatoid synovitis have been coupled with increasingly refined methods from biotechnology to produce promising therapeutic agents. Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), recombinant cytokines, cytokine receptor fusion proteins and other biologics have been elevated from the status of novel reagents applied in phase I toxicity trials to, in some cases, substantially evaluated and validated tools awaiting federal regulatory approval. Biologic agents will soon be released for the treatment of patients with RA. We review some of the most promising preclinical work that supports a position of optimism regarding the future of RA. We also speculate on the potential role for biologics in future management of patients with RA.

Rheumatoid arthritis: current clinical and research directions

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovitis and joint erosions. It affects approximately 1% of the adult population in a female/male ratio ranging from 2:1 to 4:1. RA is an insidious disease, typically having an onset of symmetric joint swelling and reaching a peak incidence in the fourth and fifth decades. Extraarticular manifestations include pulmonary, ocular, and vascular disease. The etiology of RA remains unknown. Attempts to discover infectious causes have proven unsuccessful, although environmental influences may trigger a response leading to the development of this autoimmune disease. Genetic associations have been identified, particularly with the major histocompatibility complex class II antigens. Furthermore, twin studies have shown a 30%-50% concordance rate for monozygotic twins. Approximately 70%-80% of patients with RA have rheumatoid factor present in the blood, although its role remains unclear. Hormonal status may influence RA. The majority of RA patients are women, and in 75% of them, the disease improves during pregnancy. RA has significant financial and social implications associated with treatment costs, lost wages, disability, and increased mortality. Mainstays of medical therapy have included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents, such as prednisone and methotrexate. Recent advances in the treatment of RA include specific inhibitors of cyclooxygenase II, T cells, blood vessels, cytokines (such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha] or interleukin-1 [IL-1]), and adhesion molecules. Additional studies are ongoing with combination interventions. It is anticipated that a better understanding of the basic pathophysiologic mechanisms critical in RA pathogenesis will provide more precise and efficacious therapy.

Early rheumatoid arthritis. Future treatment

As the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) becomes more clearly defined there is the expectation that biotechnological advances may allow additional forms of therapeutic intervention that are specific for the disease process. The purpose of this review is to describe the use of biological agents in the treatment of RA. Encouraging results in animal models using vaccines based on the pathogenic T-cell or the autoantigen have prompted the design of selective immune-based therapies. Preliminary studies following this strategy have not yet shown clinical efficacy. The results of early studies with monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte surface antigen were promising but were not sustained in controlled studies. Exciting data have been collected from placebo-controlled studies of monoclonal antibodies against TNF alpha. The development of biological agents in RA may not be as quick as expected but the steady progress makes it likely that our weapons to combat unwanted autoimmune responses will become more accurate and effective.