Oxcarbazepine disposition: preliminary observations in patients

Population pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Oxcarbazepine is commonly used as first-line treatment for partial and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Owing to the high pharmacokinetic variability, several population pharmacokinetic models have been developed for oxcarbazepine to explore potential covariates that affect its pharmacokinetic variation.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the published population pharmacokinetic studies of oxcarbazepine in children and adults available in PubMed and Embase databases. The quality of the retrieved studies was evaluated, and significant covariates that may have an impact on the dosage regimen of oxcarbazepine were explored.

EXPERT OPINION

The pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine was founded to be affected by body weight and co-administration with enzyme inducers. Pediatric patients require a higher dose per kilogram than adults because children generally have a higher clearance than adults. Moreover, to maintain the target concentration, patients co-administrate with enzyme inducers need a higher dose than monotherapy due to higher clearance in those patients. Because limited information is available for exposure-response relationship, additional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics investigations of oxcarbazepine need to be conducted to optimize the dosage regimen in clinical practice.

A Novel Enantioselective Microassay for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Determination of Oxcarbazepine and Its Active Metabolite Monohydroxycarbazepine in Human Plasma

A simple and innovative assay is described that allows the determination of the antiepileptic drug oxcarbazepine and the chiral separation of the two enantiomers of its active metabolite monohydroxycarbazepine (licarbazepine). The assay requires liquid-liquid extraction of the sample (200 microL) into tert-butyl methyl ether and dichloromethane, drying of the organic phase under a nitrogen stream, reconstitution with the mobile phase, and injection in the high-performance liquid chromatography system after filtering. Separation of oxcarbazepine, R-(-)-monohydroxycarbazepine, S-(+)-monohydroxycarbazepine, and the second-step metabolite 10,11-trans-dihydroxycarbamazepine (racemate) is achieved with a Chiralcel ODR column and potassium hexafluorophosphate/acetonitrile as mobile phase. Detection is by ultraviolet absorbance at 210 nm. Standard curves are linear (r2 > or = 0.999) over the range of 0.1 to 25 microg/mL for each analyte with a limit of quantification of 0.1 microg/mL (1 ng injected) for all compounds. Within-day and between-day precision is better than 12% and within-day and between-day accuracy is between 99% and 116% for each compound. These performance characteristics are adequate for pharmacokinetic studies and for therapeutic drug monitoring. However, because the two enantiomers of monohydroxycarbazepine exhibit similar pharmacologic activity, nonenantioselective assays are likely to be more cost-effective for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes.

10-Hydroxycarbazepine Serum Concentration-to-Oxcarbazepine Dose Ratio

This study was done to evaluate the association between patient age and the concomitant use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) concentration-to-dose ratio (CDR) by a multivariate analysis. The influence of patient age and concomitant AEDs on the trough steady-state serum concentration of 10-hydroxycarbazepine (OHC) normalized to 1 mg/kg body weight of OXC or concentration-to-dose ratio (OHC-OXC-CDR) was assessed by analysis of covariance. Samples were collected from 106 patients (90% outpatients), aged 1-80, who were receiving OXC either alone (n = 41) or in combination with other AEDs (n = 65). The average OHC-OXC CDR was 0.70 +/- 0.26 (mean +/- SD). Analysis of covariance showed that patient age was influential (P < 0.001) and that there was a difference between the noninducers group (OXC or OXC + lamotrigine, topiramate, or valproate) and the inducers group (OXC + phenobarbital or phenytoin) (P < 0.001). The OHC-OXC CDR increased with age (r = 0.14, P < 0.001) and was approximately 48% lower in children aged 6 or less than in patients over 45, and approximately 32% lower in the inducers group than in patients receiving OXC alone. The correlation between OHC-OXC CDR and the age of the patients concerned with OXC alone was r = 0.48, P < 0.001. In the noninducers group the OHC-OXC CDR was 0.59 +/- 0.24 in patients aged 11 or less (n = 16), and 0.81 +/- 0.23 in patients over 11 years (n = 62). In the inducers group it was 0.25 +/- 0.11 in patients aged 11 or less (n = 3) and 0.57 +/- 0.18 in patients over the age of 11 (n = 25). The OHC-OXC CDR increased with patient age and decreased in the presence of enzyme-inducing AEDs in epileptic patients chronically treated with OXC. These influences may be clinically relevant, and, therefore, patient age and the presence of inducers should be considered in estimating either compliance or the OXC dose needed to achieve a desired OHC concentration.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine

Oxcarbazepine is an antiepileptic drug with a chemical structure similar to carbamazepine, but with different metabolism. Oxcarbazepine is rapidly reduced to 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (monohydroxy derivative, MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of oxcarbazepine. MHD has (S)-(+)- and the (R)-(-)-enantiomer, but the pharmacokinetics of the racemate are usually reported. The bioavailability of the oral formulation of oxcarbazepine is high (>95%). It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, reaching peak concentrations within about 1-3 hours after a single dose, whereas the peak of MHD occurs within 4-12 hours. At steady state, the peak of MHD occurs about 2-4 hours after drug intake. The plasma protein binding of MHD is about 40%. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of MHD are in the same range as unbound plasma concentrations of MHD. Oxcarbazepine can be transferred significantly through the placenta in humans. Oxcarbazepine and MHD exhibit linear pharmaco-kinetics and no autoinduction occurs. Elimination half-lives in healthy volunteers are 1-5 hours for oxcarbazepine and 7-20 hours for MHD. Longer and shorter elimination half-lives have been reported in elderly volunteers and children, respectively. Mild to moderate hepatic impairment does not appear to affect MHD pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment affects the pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine and MHD. The interaction potential of oxcarbazepine is relatively low. However, enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs such as phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine can reduce slightly the concentrations of MHD. Verapamil may moderately decrease MHD concentrations, but this effect is probably without clinical relevance. The influence of oxcarbazepine on other antiepileptic drugs is not clinically relevant in most cases. However, oxcarbazepine appears to increase concentrations of phenytoin and to decrease trough concentrations of lamotrigine and topiramate. Oxcarbazepine lowers concentrations of ethinylestra-diol and levonorgestrel, and women treated with oxcarbazepine should consider additional contraceptive measures. Due to the absent or lower enzyme-inducing effect of oxcarbazepine, switching from carbamazepine to oxcarbazepine can result in increased serum concentrations of comedication, sometimes associated with adverse effects. The effect of oxcarbazepine appears to be related to dose and to serum concentrations of MHD. In general, daily fluctuations of MHD concentration are relatively slight, smaller than would be expected from the elimination half-life of MHD. However, relatively high fluctuations can be observed in individual patients. Therapeutic monitoring may help to decide whether adverse effects are dependent on MHD concentrations. A mean therapeutic range of 15-35 mg/L for MHD seems to be appropriate. However, more systematic studies exploring the concentration-effect relationship are required.

Oxcarbazepine, an antiepileptic agent

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurologic condition. Many of the currently approved pharmacologic agents for its treatment are associated with numerous adverse drug reactions and drug interactions.

OBJECTIVE

This review describes the pharmacology and therapeutic use of oxcarbazepine, an analogue of the well-known antiepileptic agent carbamazepine.

METHODS

Articles for review were identified through a search of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and EMBASE for the years 1980 through 2000. The terms used individually and in combination were oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine, epilepsy, and seizures.

RESULTS

Oxcarbazepine and its primary metabolite have been effective in animal models of epilepsy that generally predict efficacy in generalized tonic-clonic seizures and partial seizures in humans. The exact mechanism of action of oxcarbazepine is unknown, although as with carbamazepine, it is believed to involve blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. The pharmacokinetic profile of oxcarbazepine is less complicated than that of carbamazepine, with less metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system, no production of an epoxide metabolite, and lower plasma protein binding. The clinical efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine have been demonstrated in trials in adults, children, and the elderly. In a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial in adults, oxcarbazepine 300 mg was associated with a decrease in the mean frequency of tonic seizures (21.4 vs 30.5 seizures during steady-state periods) and tonic-clonic seizures (8.2 vs 10.4) compared with carbamazepine 200 mg (P = 0.05). A multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 28-week trial assessed the efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine at doses of 600, 1200, and 2400 mg as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. All 3 oxcarbazepine groups demonstrated a reduction in seizure frequency per 28-day period compared with placebo (600 mg, 26% reduction; 1200 mg, 40% reduction; 2400 mg, 50% reduction; placebo, 7.6% reduction; all, P < 0.001). A trial in children assessed the efficacy and toxicity of oxcarbazepine (median dose, 31.4 mg/kg/d) as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures. Patients receiving oxcarbazepine experienced a 35% reduction in seizure frequency, compared with a 9% reduction in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The most common adverse effects associated with oxcarbazepine are related to the central nervous system (eg, dizziness, headache, diplopia, and ataxia) and the gastrointestinal system (eg, nausea and vomiting). Compared with carbamazepine, there is an increased risk of hyponatremia with oxcarbazepine. The frequency and severity of drug interactions are less with oxcarbazepine than with carbamazepine or other antiepileptic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxcarbazepine may be considered an appropriate alternative to carbamazepine for the treatment of partial seizures in patients who are unable to tolerate carbamazepine. Its use in nonseizure disorders remains to be examined in large-scale clinical trials, and pharmacoeconomic comparisons of oxcarbazepine with other antiepileptic agents, particularly carbamazepine, are needed.

Treatment of epilepsy in the elderly

Management of epilepsy in the elderly involves many challenges, including the presence of concomitant diseases, polypharmacy and changes in body physiology. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have to be taken into account in order to avoid potentially severe adverse drug reactions in elderly people. The present study reviews the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the elderly. Because some AEDs may induce the metabolism of other agents and reduce the effectiveness of several drugs, the physicians have to carefully evaluate concomitant drugs being administered. Moreover, the main problems appear to be when beginning therapy, the first choice drug, the appropriate dosage and pharmacologic compliance. Elderly patients must be screened for hepatic and renal functions before beginning a treatment with an AED, carefully interviewed to reduce complaints for drug side-effects which may negatively influence compliance and monitored for total and free blood levels. Besides the 'classic' AEDs, such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, valproic acid, primidone and benzodiazepines, the review shows the possible advantages of new AEDs, such as felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and gamma-vinyl-GABA, which may be used in the elderly too for their good tolerability. A careful control of drug assumption is requested in the elderly, especially when it is difficult to achieve seizure control.

Pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in human placenta

PURPOSE

To study the transfer and metabolism of oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) and 10-hydroxy-10,11-dihydrocarbamazepine (10-OH-CBZ) and carbamazepine (CBZ) metabolism and its possible induction in human placenta.

METHODS

A dual recirculating human placental perfusion system, blood sampling, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and enzyme assays.

RESULTS

OCBZ was metabolized into 10-OH-CBZ in five human placental cotyledons perfused for 2 h in a dual recirculating perfusion system. The same metabolite was found by HPLC in three sample pairs of maternal and cord blood taken during delivery from patients on OCBZ therapy. In all of the clinical samples, 10,11-trans-dihydroxy-10,11-dihydrocarbamazepine (10,11-D) was also found, but not in the perfusions. In addition, 10-OH-CBZ was not metabolized in the placental perfusions. The transfer of OCBZ through the perfused placentas was quicker than the transfer of antipyrine, while the transfer of 10-OH-CBZ was slower. Both OCBZ and 10-OH-CBZ also accumulated in placental tissue. CBZ metabolism was studied in three perfusions using placentas from mothers on CBZ therapy. No metabolism could be detected in the perfused placentas, while metabolites were found in both maternal and cord blood of the same mothers. Another series of placentas of mothers on CBZ therapy did not differ significantly from the placenta of a healthy mother as to CYP activities or the level of CYP3A4 mRNA.

CONCLUSIONS

OCBZ is metabolized into 10-OH-CBZ to some extent in human placenta in vitro, suggesting that the placenta also participates in the metabolism of OCBZ in vivo. On the contrary, the placenta does not participate in the metabolism of CBZ. No induction of placental CBZ metabolism in vitro can be detected after maternal CBZ treatment during pregnancy.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of the new antiepileptic drugs

Therapy with traditional antiepileptic drugs is associated with a wide range of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. In particular, enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition and displacement from protein binding may result in important changes in serum concentrations of antiepileptics. Relevant interactions have also been described for some new antiepileptics. Felbamate increases serum concentrations of phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproic acid (sodium valproate). On the other hand, it reduces concentrations of carbamazepine and increases concentrations of its metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Concentrations of felbamate itself are reduced by phenytoin and carbamazepine. Concentrations of lamotrigine are considerably increased by valproic acid and decreased by phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital (phenobarbitone). Vigabatrin reduces serum concentrations of phenytoin by approximately 20%. On the other hand, some new antiepileptics have the important advantage of not interfering with the metabolism of other antiepileptics; this is the case for gabapentin, lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin, oxcarbazepine and vigabatrin are independent of concomitant drugs. These aspects are especially important as, until now, new antiepileptics have been most often utilised as add-on therapy.

Pharmacokinetic profile of topiramate in comparison with other new antiepileptic drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in broad use today have a number of pharmacokinetic liabilities, including a propensity for clinically meaningful drug interactions. Therefore, new AEDs with improved pharmacokinetic characteristics would be welcomed. The pharmacokinetic profiles of six newer AEDs--topiramate (TPM), gabapentin (GBP), vigabatrin (VGB), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), and felbamate--were reviewed. Some of these AEDs offer an improvement in one or more pharmacokinetic parameters compared with traditional AEDs, with TPM, GBP, VGB, and OCBZ demonstrating the most advantageous overall pharmacokinetic profiles.

Fluctuations of 10-hydroxy-carbazepine during the day in epileptic patients

Oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) is a new antiepileptic drug with a chemical structure similar to carbamazepine. We investigated the daily fluctuations of 10-OH-carbazepine (monohydroxy derivative, MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of OCBZ, in patients with or without comedication. Twenty-two profiles of (total) serum concentrations of MHD from 18 epileptic patients on a b.i.d. OCBZ regimen were determined at 8.00, 11.00, 14.00, 17.00, 20.00 h (and 22.00 h/23.00 h). A patient was only considered twice if his comedication or OCBZ dosage had been changed. The maximal MHD concentrations were about 33% +/- 14% higher than the minimal MHD concentrations during the day. The free MHD concentrations were determined in 17 profiles. The mean free fraction of MHD was 56.7% +/- 5.5%. In combination with valproic acid the free fraction (64.0% +/- 1.4%) was slightly, but significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in monotherapy (52.3% +/- 0.9%) or in combination (58.0% +/- 2.6%) with other antiepileptic drugs (2 x phenobarbital, 2 x methsuximide, 1 x sulthiame). Further studies are necessary to clarify if the observed fluctuations of MHD are of clinical importance.

Effects of felbamate on the pharmacokinetics of the monohydroxy and dihydroxy metabolites of oxcarbazepine

The effects of felbamate on the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of the monohydroxy and dihydroxy metabolites of oxcarbazepine were assessed in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers. Oxcarbazepine, 1200 mg/day, was administered on an open basis in combination with double-blind placebo or 2400 mg/day felbamate for two 10-day treatment periods separated by a 14-day washout period. Pharmacokinetic parameters of monohydroxyoxcarbazepine and dihydroxyoxcarbazepine were determined from plasma and urine samples obtained on the tenth day of each treatment period. Felbamate had no effect on monohydroxyoxcarbazepine plasma or urine pharmacokinetics compared with placebo, but it significantly increased values for dihydroxyoxcarbazepine maximum concentration and area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours, as well as urinary excretion of free and total dihydroxyoxcarbazepine. The mechanism that may account for the observations is the induction of oxidative metabolism of monohydroxyoxcarbazepine. Despite these changes, the relative amount of dihydroxyoxcarbazepine is small in comparison to monohydroxyoxcarbazepine, and antiepileptic activity is associated with monohydroxyoxcarbazepine rather than dihydroxyoxcarbazepine. Therefore we conclude that felbamate has no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine in humans.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs

We have reviewed the pharmacokinetics of six antiepileptic drugs that are marketed (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, and zonisamide) and six drugs that are undergoing evaluation (levetiracetam, ralitoline, remacemide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and topiramate). In addition, we have compared the prodrugs eterobarb and fosphenytoin and the controlled-release formulations of valproic acid and carbamazepine with their parent compounds. Finally, we have devised a scoring system to compare the pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs. Using this system, vigabatrin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and topiramate appea to have the most favourable pharmacokinetic profiles, whilst ralitoline and stiripentol have the least favourable.

Newer antiepileptic drugs. Towards an improved risk-benefit ratio

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. Drugs for the treatment of partial seizures are particularly needed. With major advances in our understanding of the basic neuropathology, neuropharmacology and neurophysiology of epilepsy, numerous candidate novel antiepileptic drugs have been developed in recent years. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of 12 new antiepileptic drugs namely vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, eterobarb, zonisamide, remacemide, stiripentol, topiramate and levetiracetam (ucb-L059). Of the 12 drugs, vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin have recently been marketed in the UK. Five of these new drugs have known mechanisms of action (vigabatrin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine and eterobarb), which may provide for a more rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine, remacemide and eterobarb are prodrugs. Vigabatrin, gabapentin and topiramate are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic characteristics in that they are excreted mainly unchanged in urine and not susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. In contrast, lamotrigine, felbamate and stiripentol exhibit significant drug interactions. Essentially, all the drugs are effective in partial or secondarily generalised seizures and are effective to varying degrees in other seizure types. Particularly welcome is the possible effectiveness of zonisamide in myoclonus and felbamate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In relation to adverse effects, CNS effects are observed with all drugs, however, gabapentin, remacemide and levetiracetam appear to exhibit least. There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs which do become licensed are an advance in that they are effective and/or are associated with less adverse effects than currently available antiepileptic drugs in these patients, it is possible that these drugs may exhibit even more improved risk-benefit ratios when used in normal clinical practice.

Oxcarbazepine: pharmacokinetic interactions and their clinical relevance

Antiepileptic drug (AED) interactions are a common problem during epilepsy treatment. Oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) is a keto homologue of carbamazepine (CBZ) with a completely different metabolic profile. In humans, the keto group is rapidly and quantitatively reduced to form a monohydroxy derivative (MHD), which is the main active agent during OCBZ therapy. MHD is eliminated by renal excretion, glucuronidation and, marginally, by hydroxylation to a diol derivative. This metabolic profile, and in particular the limited involvement of oxidative microsomal enzymes, suggests that OCBZ may have fewer drug interactions compared with traditional AEDs. This possibility has been investigated in experimental studies and, retrospectively, in data obtained from clinical trials. The capacity of OCBZ to induce microsomal enzymes of the P-450 family has mostly been examined by use of antipyrine and CBZ kinetics as markers. The results suggest that OCBZ has little enzyme inducing capacity. In clinical trials in which OCBZ was substituted for CBZ, plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs were increased, possibly as a consequence of total or partial de-induction. OCBZ interference with other drugs has been evaluated for warfarin, felodipine, and oral contraceptives, three medications strongly influenced by enzyme-inducing AEDs. OCBZ does not modify the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, whereas some reduction in felodipine concentration and a clinically significant reduction of contraceptive drug levels and efficacy were observed. Polytherapy with established AEDs does not significantly modify OCBZ disposition (MHD kinetics); however, available information is not extensive. Finally, the action on OCBZ kinetics of a group of drugs (verapamil, cimetidine, erythromycin, dextropropoxyphene, and viloxazine) known to inhibit the metabolism of some AEDs has been studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine and its active metabolite 10-hydroxy-carbazepine in healthy subjects and in epileptic patients treated with phenobarbitone or valproic acid

The kinetics of oxcarbazepine (OXC) and its active metabolite 10-hydroxy-carbazepine (10-OH-CZ) after a single oral OXC dose (600 mg) were compared in healthy control subjects and in epileptic patients treated with phenobarbitone or sodium valproate (n = 8 in each group). In all groups, serum 10-OH-CZ concentrations were much higher than those of the parent drug. In patients on valproate, the kinetics of OXC and 10-OH-CZ did not differ significantly from those observed in controls. In patients on phenobarbitone, AUC values of both OXC and 10-OH-CZ were lower than in controls (2.9 +/- 0.4 vs 5.1 +/- 0.7 microg ml(-1) h and 89 +/- 7 vs 119 +/- 10 microg ml(-1) h respectively, means +/- s.e. mean, P < 0.05), whereas 10-OH-CZ half-lives were only marginally shorter (17 +/- 1 h vs 20 +/- 2 h, NS). These data indicate that the biotransformation of OXC and 10-OH-CZ may be accelerated by concomitant treatment with phenobarbitone but that the magnitude of this effect is unlikely to be of great clinical significance.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of the newer antiepileptic drugs

During the past few years a major increase has taken place in the number of drugs which have become available in the antiepileptic arsenal. In fact, 3 new antiepileptic drugs, vigabatrin, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine, were recently approved in several European countries. Two other drugs, felbamate and gabapentin, are expected to be approved in the US in the near future. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics of the following 10 new antiepileptic drugs: felbamate, flunarizine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, remacemide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate and vigabatrin. Three of the new drugs, gabapentin, topiramate and vigabatrin, are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic features. They are well absorbed, excreted mainly unchanged in the urine, and are not susceptible to enzyme induction or inhibition. Their drug interaction potential appears to be minimal. About 50% of felbamate is excreted unchanged, with the rest eliminated by metabolism. The remaining drugs are eliminated by metabolic processes such as glucuronidation (lamotrigine), deglycine formation (remacemide) or oxidative metabolism (flunarizine and stiripentol). Oxcarbazepine and remacemide have high hepatic clearance and are biotransformed to hydroxy and deglycine metabolites, respectively, with the activity of their metabolites contributing to the antiepileptic activity of the parent drug after oral administration, despite high first-pass effect metabolism. Gabapentin and oxcarbazepine do not behave pharmacokinetically as their original design intended. Gabapentin is not effective as a chemical drug delivery system for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and oxcarbazepine serves as a prodrug to its hydroxy metabolite, but does not act as a drug on its own. Nevertheless, these 2 agents demonstrate efficacy in extensive preclinical and clinical trials. Although the pharmacokinetics features of these drugs are important, these features are secondary to their pharmacodynamic properties--i.e. to the requirement that new antiepileptic drugs have to have proven clinical efficacy and safety in epileptic patients.

Oxcarbazepine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in epilepsy, trigeminal neuralgia and affective disorders

Oxcarbazepine is the 10-keto analogue of carbamazepine but has a distinct pharmacokinetic profile. In contrast to the oxidative metabolism of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine is rapidly reduced to its active metabolite, 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbamazepine. With the possible exception of the P450IIIA isozyme of the cytochrome P450 family, neither oxcarbazepine nor its monohydroxy derivative induce hepatic oxidative metabolism. Direct comparison of oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine has shown no difference in efficacy between these 2 agents in terms of reducing seizure frequency in patients with partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalisation, or with tonic-clonic seizures. Substitution of oxcarbazepine for carbamazepine in multiple antiepileptic drug regimens improved seizure control in some patients with refractory epilepsy; however, the rise in serum concentrations of concurrent antiepileptic agents secondary to elimination of carbamazepine-associated hepatic enzyme induction may have also played a role. Substitution of oxcarbazepine for carbamazepine was associated with improved cognition and alertness in some patients with epilepsy. Limited data indicate that oxcarbazepine may be a useful alternative to carbamazepine in the management of trigeminal neuralgia. Experience in patients with acute mania is promising, but the value of oxcarbazepine in managing affective disorders, particularly as a prophylactic agent, is not established. Oxcarbazepine may be better tolerated than carbamazepine; however, the current published database is small and the potential for oxcarbazepine to induce the type of serious idiosyncratic reactions occasionally associated with carbamazepine is unknown. Hyponatraemia has been reported in patients treated with oxcarbazepine. Although apparently asymptomatic, fluid restriction may be deemed necessary in some patients to reduce the risk of precipitating seizures secondary to low serum sodium. Thus, oxcarbazepine appears to be an effective substitute for carbamazepine in those patients intolerant of this agent, or experiencing significant drug interactions. Wider clinical experience should help clarify the long term efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine. Pharmacokinetic advantages over current antiepileptic drugs, carbamazepine in particular, may then favour oxcarbazepine for consideration as a first-line agent in the management of partial and tonic-clonic epilepsy.