1
|
Andreyeva EN, Emelyanov AV, Nevil M, Sun L, Vershilova E, Hill CA, Keogh MC, Duronio RJ, Skoultchi AI, Fyodorov DV. Drosophila SUMM4 complex couples insulator function and DNA replication control. eLife 2022; 11:e81828. [PMID: 36458689 PMCID: PMC9917439 DOI: 10.7554/elife.81828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Asynchronous replication of chromosome domains during S phase is essential for eukaryotic genome function, but the mechanisms establishing which domains replicate early versus late in different cell types remain incompletely understood. Intercalary heterochromatin domains replicate very late in both diploid chromosomes of dividing cells and in endoreplicating polytene chromosomes where they are also underreplicated. Drosophila SNF2-related factor SUUR imparts locus-specific underreplication of polytene chromosomes. SUUR negatively regulates DNA replication fork progression; however, its mechanism of action remains obscure. Here, we developed a novel method termed MS-Enabled Rapid protein Complex Identification (MERCI) to isolate a stable stoichiometric native complex SUMM4 that comprises SUUR and a chromatin boundary protein Mod(Mdg4)-67.2. Mod(Mdg4) stimulates SUUR ATPase activity and is required for a normal spatiotemporal distribution of SUUR in vivo. SUUR and Mod(Mdg4)-67.2 together mediate the activities of gypsy insulator that prevent certain enhancer-promoter interactions and establish euchromatin-heterochromatin barriers in the genome. Furthermore, SuUR or mod(mdg4) mutations reverse underreplication of intercalary heterochromatin. Thus, SUMM4 can impart late replication of intercalary heterochromatin by attenuating the progression of replication forks through euchromatin/heterochromatin boundaries. Our findings implicate a SNF2 family ATP-dependent motor protein SUUR in the insulator function, reveal that DNA replication can be delayed by a chromatin barrier, and uncover a critical role for architectural proteins in replication control. They suggest a mechanism for the establishment of late replication that does not depend on an asynchronous firing of late replication origins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgeniya N Andreyeva
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUnited States
| | | | - Markus Nevil
- UNC-SPIRE, University of North CarolinaChapel HillUnited States
| | - Lu Sun
- EpiCypherDurhamUnited States
| | - Elena Vershilova
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUnited States
| | - Christina A Hill
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUnited States
| | | | - Robert J Duronio
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUnited States
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North CarolinaChapel HillUnited States
- Department of Biology, University of North CarolinaChapel HillUnited States
- Department of Genetics, University of North CarolinaChapel HillUnited States
| | - Arthur I Skoultchi
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUnited States
| | - Dmitry V Fyodorov
- Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Das S, Caballero M, Kolesnikova T, Zhimulev I, Koren A, Nordman J. Replication timing analysis in polyploid cells reveals Rif1 uses multiple mechanisms to promote underreplication in Drosophila. Genetics 2021; 219:6369517. [PMID: 34740250 PMCID: PMC8570783 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Regulation of DNA replication and copy number is necessary to promote genome stability and maintain cell and tissue function. DNA replication is regulated temporally in a process known as replication timing (RT). Rap1-interacting factor 1 (Rif1) is a key regulator of RT and has a critical function in copy number control in polyploid cells. Previously, we demonstrated that Rif1 functions with SUUR to inhibit replication fork progression and promote underreplication (UR) of specific genomic regions. How Rif1-dependent control of RT factors into its ability to promote UR is unknown. By applying a computational approach to measure RT in Drosophila polyploid cells, we show that SUUR and Rif1 have differential roles in controlling UR and RT. Our findings reveal that Rif1 acts to promote late replication, which is necessary for SUUR-dependent underreplication. Our work provides new insight into the process of UR and its links to RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souradip Das
- Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Madison Caballero
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Tatyana Kolesnikova
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.,Laboratory of Structural, Functional and Comparative Genomics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Igor Zhimulev
- Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.,Laboratory of Structural, Functional and Comparative Genomics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Amnon Koren
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Jared Nordman
- Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Munden A, Rong Z, Sun A, Gangula R, Mallal S, Nordman JT. Rif1 inhibits replication fork progression and controls DNA copy number in Drosophila. eLife 2018; 7:e39140. [PMID: 30277458 PMCID: PMC6185109 DOI: 10.7554/elife.39140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Control of DNA copy number is essential to maintain genome stability and ensure proper cell and tissue function. In Drosophila polyploid cells, the SNF2-domain-containing SUUR protein inhibits replication fork progression within specific regions of the genome to promote DNA underreplication. While dissecting the function of SUUR's SNF2 domain, we identified an interaction between SUUR and Rif1. Rif1 has many roles in DNA metabolism and regulates the replication timing program. We demonstrate that repression of DNA replication is dependent on Rif1. Rif1 localizes to active replication forks in a partially SUUR-dependent manner and directly regulates replication fork progression. Importantly, SUUR associates with replication forks in the absence of Rif1, indicating that Rif1 acts downstream of SUUR to inhibit fork progression. Our findings uncover an unrecognized function of the Rif1 protein as a regulator of replication fork progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Munden
- Department of Biological SciencesVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUnited States
| | - Zhan Rong
- Department of Biological SciencesVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUnited States
| | - Amanda Sun
- Department of Biological SciencesVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUnited States
| | - Rama Gangula
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUnited States
| | - Simon Mallal
- Department of MedicineVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUnited States
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and ImmunologyVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUnited States
| | - Jared T Nordman
- Department of Biological SciencesVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:623. [PMID: 30134926 PMCID: PMC6103881 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic regions repressed for DNA replication, resulting in either delayed replication in S phase or underreplication in polyploid cells, are thought to be controlled by inhibition of replication origin activation. Studies in Drosophila polytene cells, however, raised the possibility that impeding replication fork progression also plays a major role. Results We exploited genomic regions underreplicated (URs) with tissue specificity in Drosophila polytene cells to analyze mechanisms of replication repression. By localizing the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) in the genome of the larval fat body and comparing this to ORC binding in the salivary gland, we found that sites of ORC binding show extensive tissue specificity. In contrast, there are common domains nearly devoid of ORC in the salivary gland and fat body that also have reduced density of ORC binding sites in diploid cells. Strikingly, domains lacking ORC can still be replicated in some polytene tissues, showing absence of ORC and origins is insufficient to repress replication. Analysis of the width and location of the URs with respect to ORC position indicates that whether or not a genomic region lacking ORC is replicated is controlled by whether replication forks formed outside the region are inhibited. Conclusions These studies demonstrate that inhibition of replication fork progression can block replication across genomic regions that constitutively lack ORC. Replication fork progression can be inhibited in both tissue-specific and genome region-specific ways. Consequently, when evaluating sources of genome instability it is important to consider altered control of replication forks in response to differentiation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4992-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
5
|
DNA Replication Control During Drosophila Development: Insights into the Onset of S Phase, Replication Initiation, and Fork Progression. Genetics 2017; 207:29-47. [PMID: 28874453 PMCID: PMC5586379 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.186627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Proper control of DNA replication is critical to ensure genomic integrity during cell proliferation. In addition, differential regulation of the DNA replication program during development can change gene copy number to influence cell size and gene expression. Drosophila melanogaster serves as a powerful organism to study the developmental control of DNA replication in various cell cycle contexts in a variety of differentiated cell and tissue types. Additionally, Drosophila has provided several developmentally regulated replication models to dissect the molecular mechanisms that underlie replication-based copy number changes in the genome, which include differential underreplication and gene amplification. Here, we review key findings and our current understanding of the developmental control of DNA replication in the contexts of the archetypal replication program as well as of underreplication and differential gene amplification. We focus on the use of these latter two replication systems to delineate many of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the developmental control of replication initiation and fork elongation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Posukh OV, Maksimov DA, Laktionov PP, Koryakov DE, Belyakin SN. Functional dissection of Drosophila melanogaster SUUR protein influence on H3K27me3 profile. Epigenetics Chromatin 2017; 10:56. [PMID: 29191233 PMCID: PMC5709859 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-017-0163-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In eukaryotes, heterochromatin replicates late in S phase of the cell cycle and contains specific covalent modifications of histones. SuUR mutation found in Drosophila makes heterochromatin replicate earlier than in wild type and reduces the level of repressive histone modifications. SUUR protein was shown to be associated with moving replication forks, apparently through the interaction with PCNA. The biological process underlying the effects of SUUR on replication and composition of heterochromatin remains unknown. RESULTS Here we performed a functional dissection of SUUR protein effects on H3K27me3 level. Using hidden Markow model-based algorithm we revealed SuUR-sensitive chromosomal regions that demonstrated unusual characteristics: They do not contain Polycomb and require SUUR function to sustain H3K27me3 level. We tested the role of SUUR protein in the mechanisms that could affect H3K27me3 histone levels in these regions. We found that SUUR does not affect the initial H3K27me3 pattern formation in embryogenesis or Polycomb distribution in the chromosomes. We also ruled out the possible effect of SUUR on histone genes expression and its involvement in DSB repair. CONCLUSIONS Obtained results support the idea that SUUR protein contributes to the heterochromatin maintenance during the chromosome replication. A model that explains major SUUR-associated phenotypes is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga V Posukh
- Genomics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Lavrentyev ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| | - Daniil A Maksimov
- Genomics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Lavrentyev ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| | - Petr P Laktionov
- Genomics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Lavrentyev ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090
| | - Dmitry E Koryakov
- Genomics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Lavrentyev ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090.,Novosibirsk State University, Pirogov str. 2, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Stepan N Belyakin
- Genomics Lab, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Lavrentyev ave. 8/2, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090. .,Novosibirsk State University, Pirogov str. 2, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brown SC, Bourge M, Maunoury N, Wong M, Wolfe Bianchi M, Lepers-Andrzejewski S, Besse P, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Dron M, Satiat-Jeunemaître B. DNA Remodeling by Strict Partial Endoreplication in Orchids, an Original Process in the Plant Kingdom. Genome Biol Evol 2017; 9:1051-1071. [PMID: 28419219 PMCID: PMC5546068 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA remodeling during endoreplication appears to be a strong developmental characteristic in orchids. In this study, we analyzed DNA content and nuclei in 41 species of orchids to further map the genome evolution in this plant family. We demonstrate that the DNA remodeling observed in 36 out of 41 orchids studied corresponds to strict partial endoreplication. Such process is developmentally regulated in each wild species studied. Cytometry data analyses allowed us to propose a model where nuclear states 2C, 4E, 8E, etc. form a series comprising a fixed proportion, the euploid genome 2C, plus 2-32 additional copies of a complementary part of the genome. The fixed proportion ranged from 89% of the genome in Vanilla mexicana down to 19% in V. pompona, the lowest value for all 148 orchids reported. Insterspecific hybridization did not suppress this phenomenon. Interestingly, this process was not observed in mass-produced epiphytes. Nucleolar volumes grow with the number of endocopies present, coherent with high transcription activity in endoreplicated nuclei. Our analyses suggest species-specific chromatin rearrangement. Towards understanding endoreplication, V. planifolia constitutes a tractable system for isolating the genomic sequences that confer an advantage via endoreplication from those that apparently suffice at diploid level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer C. Brown
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université
Paris‐Sud, Université Paris‐Saclay, Gif‐sur‐Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Mickaël Bourge
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université
Paris‐Sud, Université Paris‐Saclay, Gif‐sur‐Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Nicolas Maunoury
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université
Paris‐Sud, Université Paris‐Saclay, Gif‐sur‐Yvette Cedex, France
| | - Maurice Wong
- Service du Développement Rural, Papeete Tahiti, French Polynesia,
France
| | - Michele Wolfe Bianchi
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université
Paris‐Sud, Université Paris‐Saclay, Gif‐sur‐Yvette Cedex, France
| | | | - Pascale Besse
- UMR 53, PVBMT Université de la Réunion – Cirad, Pôle de Protection des
Plantes, St Pierre, France
| | - Sonja Siljak-Yakovlev
- Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech,
Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay Cedex, France
| | - Michel Dron
- Institute of Plant Sciences Paris Saclay IPS2, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS,
INRA, Université Evry, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Université
Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Béatrice Satiat-Jeunemaître
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université
Paris‐Sud, Université Paris‐Saclay, Gif‐sur‐Yvette Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|