Transcriptional regulation of glutathione S-transferase P1-1 in human leukemia

Reversal of Multidrug Resistance in Human Colon Cancer and Human Leukemia Cells by Three Plant Extracts and Their Major Secondary Metabolites

Background: We studied the effect of three plant extracts (Glycyrrhiza glabra, Paeonia lactiflora, Eriobotrya japonica) and six of their major secondary metabolites (glycyrrhizic acid, 18β glycyrrhetinic acid, liquiritigenin, isoliquiritigenin, paeoniflorin, ursolic acid) on the multidrug resistant human colon cancer cell line Caco-2 and human leukemia cell line CEM/ADR 5000 as compared to the corresponding sensitive cell line CCRF-CEM, and human colon cancer cells HCT-116, which do not over-express ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Methods: The cytotoxicity of single substances in sensitive and resistant cells was investigated by MTT assay. We also applied combinations of extracts or single compounds with the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin or doxorubicin plus the saponin digitonin. The intracellular retention of the ABC transporter substrates rhodamine 123 and calcein was examined by flow cytometry to explore the effect of the substances on the activity of ABC transporters P-glycoprotein and MRP1. Real-time PCR was applied to analyse the gene expression changes of ABCB1, ABCC1, caspase 3, caspase 8, AhR, CYP1A1, and GSTP1 in resistant cells under the treatment of the substances. Results: All the substances moderately inhibited cell growth in sensitive and resistant cells to some degree. Whereas ursolic acid showed IC50 of 14 and 22 µM in CEM/ADR 5000 and Caco-2 cells, respectively, glycyrrhizic acid and paeoniflorin were inactive with IC50 values above 400 μM. Except for liquiritigenin and isoliquiritigenin, all the other substances reversed MDR in CEM/ADR 5000 and Caco-2 cells to doxorubicin. Ue, ga, 18ga, and urs were powerful reversal agents. In CEM/ADR 5000 cells, high concentrations of all the substances, except Paeonia lactiflora extract, increased calcein or rhodamine 123 retention in a dose-dependent manner. In Caco-2 cells, all the substances, except liquiritigenin, retained rhodamine 123 in a dose-dependent manner. We also examined the effect of the plant secondary metabolite (PSM) panel on the expression of ABCB1, ABCC1, caspase 3, caspase 8, AhR, CYP1A1, and GSTP1 genes in MDR cells. Conclusions: The extracts and individual PSM could reverse MDR in CEM/ADR 5000 and Caco-2 cells, which overexpress ABC transporters, in two- and three-drug combinations. Most of the PSM also inhibited the activity of ABC transporters to some degree, albeit at high concentrations. Ue, ga, 18ga, and urs were identified as potential multidrug resistance (MDR) modulator candidates, which need to be characterized and validated in further studies.

Regulation of epigenetic traits of the glutathione S-transferase P1 gene: from detoxification toward cancer prevention and diagnosis

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are phase II drug detoxifying enzymes that play an essential role in the maintenance of cell integrity and protection against DNA damage by catalyzing the conjugation of glutathione to a wide variety of exo- and endogenous electrophilic substrates. Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), the gene encoding the pi-class GST, is frequently inactivated by acquired somatic CpG island promoter hypermethylation in multiple cancer subtypes including prostate, breast, liver, and blood cancers. Epigenetically mediated GSTP1 silencing is associated with enhanced cancer susceptibility by decreasing its “caretaker” gene function, which tends to promote neoplastic transformation allowing cells to acquire additional alterations. Thus, this epigenetic alteration is now considered as a cancer biomarker but could as well play a driving role in multistep cancer development, especially well documented in prostate cancer development. The present review discusses applications of epigenetic alterations affecting GSTP1 in cancer medicine used alone or in combination with other biomarkers for cancer detection and diagnosis as well as for future targeted preventive and therapeutic interventions including by dietary agents.

Constitutive expression of an antioxidant enzyme, glutathione S-transferase P1, during differentiation of human intestinal Caco-2 cells

In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanism of the constitutive expression of an antioxidant enzyme, glutathione S-transferase (GST), during differentiation of human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. We observed that the class π GST isozyme (GST P1) expression correlated with the increased expression of caudal-related homeodomain protein 2 (CDX2), a member of the mammalian homeobox family of transcription factors. In addition, transfection of Caco-2 cells with the human CDX2 cDNA resulted in enhanced expression of the GST P1 gene and protein. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated that CDX2 binds to the GST P1 promoter containing the putative consensus CDX-binding element, TTTAC, located at -247 upstream from the established site for transcription initiation. Using the dsDNA pull-down assay, it was revealed that CDX2 recognized and bound to the putative consensus CDX-binding element within the human GST P1 promoter region and that the amount of the CDX2 bound to the putative consensus CDX-binding element increased during Caco-2 cell differentiation. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CDX2 formed the transcriptional complex with Sp1 and bound to the putative consensus CDX-binding element within the human GST P1 promoter region. These data suggest that CDX2 binds to the human GST P1 promoter via complex formation with Sp1 and controls the constitutive expression of GST P1 during Caco-2 cell differentiation.

Functional alterations in the glutathione S-transferase family associated with enhanced occurrence of esophageal carcinoma in China

Glutathione S-transferases (GST) belong to a superfamily of phase II enzymes believed to be associated with enhanced frequency of esophageal carcinoma. This study was performed to evaluate whether the GST family was associated with susceptibility to esophageal carcinoma in China. Ninety-seven patients with newly diagnosed, untreated esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) and 97 healthy controls matched in age, gender, and residence were recruited in this community-based case-control study. Null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were determined by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Ile105Val polymorphism in the fifth exon, mRNA level, CpG island hypermethylation of promoter, and protein levels of GSTP1 gene were measured with peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) techniques, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR, methylation-specific PCR (MSP), and Western blotting, respectively. The results showed that GSTM1 null genotype and GSTT1 null genotype were significantly associated with increased risk for esophageal cancer in Chinese population. Compared with the control, the relative expression levels of mRNA were significantly reduced in ESCC patients. The conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased risk for esophageal cancer was associated with CpG island hypermethylation of promoter of GSTP1 gene. GSTP1 protein levels also showed significant decrease in ESCC when adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, and alcohol use. An individual with GSTM1 or GSTT1 null genotype may thus be more susceptible to esophageal cancer development. Reduced expression in mRNA and protein levels were the main manifestations noted in aberrant function of GSTP1 gene. Data thus suggest that the CpG island hypermethylation of promoter gene may serve as a useful biomarker for early diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma development.

Expression of glutathione S-transferase pi and glutathione synthase correlates with survival in early stage non-small cell carcinomas of the lung

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) family of genes encode for detoxification enzymes that protect against reactive oxygen species and influence host susceptibility to carcinogens, including tobacco smoke. It has not been determined whether isoenzyme GST-pi or glutathione synthase (GSH2) expression by tumor cells bears a relationship to survival. A total of 201 non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with long-term follow-up were immunostained with antibodies to GST-pi and GSH2 using standard immunostaining techniques. Results were graded semiquantitatively using a scale of 0 to 3 (0 < or = 10%; 1 = 10%-50%; 2 = 51%-80%; 3 > or = 80%) for both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Results were correlated with patient survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Nuclear staining with GST-pi in greater than 10% of the cells was closely associated with decreased survival (P = .02) in stage I and II squamous cell carcinomas (n = 40). Cytoplasmic staining showed a similar trend that did not reach statistical significance. No significant correlation between GST-pi staining and survival was determined for other histologic types of NSCLC. Cytoplasmic GSH2 staining in greater than 80% of tumor cells was associated with a trend toward improved survival for stage I adenocarcinoma (P = .08) but did not show a relationship to survival for other histologic types of NSCLC. GST-pi expression predicts prognosis in stage I and II squamous cell lung carcinoma, and GSH2 expression may indicate better survival in early stage adenocarcinoma of the lung. Manipulation of GST-pi and GSH2 may be a potential basis for treatment of some NSCLC.

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of glutathione S-transferase P1 expression during butyric acid-induced differentiation of K562 cells

Over-expression of glutathione S-transferase P1 is related to chemotherapeutic drug resistance as well as to differentiation of human erythroleukemia cells. In opposition to previously described differentiating inducers which enhance the GST-resistance phenotype, time- and concentration-dependent activation of both erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation pathways by butyric acid progressively diminished GSTP1 mRNA expression. GSTP1 mRNA expression decreased by 25% (p<0.01) and 64% (p<0.01) in 1mM and 2mM butyric acid-differentiated K562 cells, respectively. These results were associated to both a reduction of GATA-1 binding activity to the GSTP1 promoter and to a posttranscriptional destabilization of GSTP1 mRNA in a concentration dependent manner. Indeed, GSTP1 mRNA half-life decreased from 43.8 to 36.2 h and 12.6 h in 1mM- and 2mM-treated cells, respectively.

From chemoprevention to chemotherapy: common targets and common goals

Three decades of research have revealed that cancer is easier to prevent than to treat and that consumption of certain fruits and vegetables can reduce the risk of cancer. Whereas chemotherapy is designed to destroy cancer after it appears, chemoprevention involves the abrogation or delay in the onset of cancer. Regardless of whether a chemopreventive or chemotherapeutic approach is taken, cancer is a multifactorial disease that requires modulation of multiple pathways and multiple targets. Various molecular targets of chemoprevention are also relevant to the therapy of cancer. These targets include the activation of apoptosis; suppression of growth factor expression or signalling; downregulation of antiapoptotic proteins; suppression of phosphatidylinositol-3'-kinase/Akt, NF-kappaB, Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription and activator protein-1 signalling pathways; and downregulation of angiogenesis through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor expression, cyclooxygenase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, adhesion molecules and cyclin D1. Pharmacologically safe phytochemicals that have been identified from plants or their variant forms can modulate these molecular targets. These phytochemicals include genistein, resveratrol, dially sulfide, S-ally cysteine, allicin, lycopene, capsaicin, curcumin, 6-gingerol, ellagic acid, ursolic acid, betulinic acid, flavopiridol, silymarin, anethol, catechins and eugenol. Recent work has shown that these phytochemicals also can reverse chemoresistance and radioresistance. Because of their pharmacological safety, these agents can be used alone to prevent cancer and in combination with chemotherapy to treat cancer.