1
|
Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kölbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N, Antoniou GA, Björck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:192-331. [PMID: 38307694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy. METHODS The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence. RESULTS A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed. CONCLUSION The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel K, Sounderajah V, Hanna L, Acharya A, Chidambaram S, Normahani P, Markar SR, Bicknell C. Quantifying the burden of survivorship associated with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:549-557.e23. [PMID: 36813007 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Survivorship encompasses the physical, psychological, social, functional, and economic experience of a living with a chronic condition for both the patient and their caregiver. It is made up of nine distinct domains and remains understudied in nononcological pathologies, including infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease (AAA). This review aims to quantify the extent to which existing AAA literature addresses the burden of survivorship. METHODS The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO databases were searched from 1989 through September 2022. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series were included. Eligible studies had to detail outcomes related to survivorship in patients with AAA. Owing to the heterogeneity between studies and outcomes, no meta-analysis was conducted. Study quality was assessed with specific risk of bias tools. RESULTS A total of 158 studies were included. Of these, only five (treatment complications, physical functioning, comorbidities, caregivers, and mental health) of the nine domains of survivorship have been studied previously. The available evidence is of variable quality; most studies display a moderate to high risk of bias, are of an observational study design, are based within a limited number of countries, and consist of an insufficient follow-up period. The most frequent complication after EVAR was endoleak. EVAR is associated with poorer long-term outcomes compared with open surgical repair in most studies retrieved. EVAR showed better outcomes in regard to physical functioning in the short term, but this advantage was lost in the long term. The most common comorbidity studied was obesity. No significant differences were found between open surgical repair and EVAR in terms of impact on caregivers. Depression is associated with various comorbidities and increased the risk of a nonhospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the absence of robust evidence regarding survivorship in AAA. As a result, contemporary treatment guidelines rely on historic quality-of-life data that are narrow in scope and nonrepresentative of contemporary clinical practice. As such, there is an urgent need to reevaluate the aims and methodology associated with traditional quality-of-life research moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kian Patel
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Viknesh Sounderajah
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lydia Hanna
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Amish Acharya
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Pasha Normahani
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Colin Bicknell
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abu Hamdeh H, Al-Jabi SW, Koni A, Zyoud SH. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Palestinians with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Rheumatol 2022; 6:19. [PMID: 35382894 PMCID: PMC8985358 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-022-00251-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studying health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction have helped in understanding how to optimize rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment outcomes and find ways to alleviate signs and symptoms among patients. OBJECTIVE In this study, our objective was to evaluate the association between satisfaction with care and HRQoL among RA patients from northern Palestine. In addition, this study also aimed to determine the associations between the clinical characteristics of patients with RA with treatment satisfaction and HRQoL. METHODS This was a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted between July and October 2018. Patients with RA diagnosis who presented at rheumatology clinics were interviewed. The SF-36 short questionnaire was used to assess HRQoL and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version 1.4 to assess treatment satisfaction among study groups. We use descriptive and comparative statistics to present the results. RESULTS A total of 283 patients were included. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were found to be associated with poor HRQoL scores and low treatment satisfaction. The physical component summary (PCS) was negatively associated with age, patients' self-reported disease activity, duration of the disease, and the total number of medications taken by the patient, and was positively associated with educational background, employment, and household income. The mental component summary (MCS) was negatively associated with patients' self-reported disease activity and the patient's total number of comorbid diseases. The number of comorbid diseases was negatively associated with effectiveness. All HRQoL subscales were significantly correlated with treatment satisfaction. The range of correlation with PCS was between 0.272 for convenience and 0.425 for side effects (p < 0.001). Similarly, the highest correlation with MCS was 0.458 for side effects, and the lowest was 0.337 for convenience (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The current study found that HRQoL was significantly correlated with treatment satisfaction. Furthermore, the results of this study showed that HRQoL and treatment satisfaction are likely to be affected by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. These results may be beneficial in clinical practice, mainly in the early treatment of patients with RA, at a stage where it is still possible to increase treatment satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Abu Hamdeh
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
| | - Samah W. Al-Jabi
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
| | - Amer Koni
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Division of Clinical Pharmacy, Hematology and Oncology Department, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
| | - Sa’ed H. Zyoud
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Poison Control and Drug Information Center (PCDIC), College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
- grid.11942.3f0000 0004 0631 5695Clinical Research Centre, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839 Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geraedts ACM, Mulay S, Terwee CB, Vahl AC, Verhagen HJM, Ünlü Ç, Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJW, Balm R. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Yearly Imaging Surveillance in Patients Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 82:221-227. [PMID: 34902477 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about the impact of standardized imaging surveillance on anxiety levels and well-being of patients after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). We hypothesize that patient anxiety levels increase just before receiving the imaging results compared with standard anxiety levels. METHODS Prospective cohort study from November 2018 to May 2020 including post-EVAR patients visiting the outpatient clinics of 4 Dutch hospitals for imaging follow-up. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was used. Patients completed the PROMIS Anxiety v1.0 Short Form (SF) 4a, PROMIS-Global Health Scale v1.2, and PROMIS-Physical Function v1.2 SF8b at 2 time points: prior to the result of the imaging study (T1: pre-visit) and 6-8 months later (T2: reference measurement). Mean T-scores at T1 were compared to T2, and T2 to the general 65+ Dutch population. RESULTS Altogether 342 invited patients were eligible, 214 completed the first questionnaire, 189 returned 2 completed questionnaires and 128 patients did not participate. Out of 214 respondents, 195 were male (91.1%) and the mean (standard deviation) age was 75.2 (7.0) years. There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 in anxiety levels (0.48; 95% confidence interval[CI] -0.42-1.38), global mental health (0.27; 95% CI -0.79-0.84), global physical health (0.10; 95% CI -0.38-1.18) and physical function (0.53; 95% CI -0.26-1.32). Compared with the 65+ Dutch population, at T2 patients experienced more anxiety (3.8; 95% CI 2.96-5.54), had worse global physical health (-3.2; 95% CI -4.38 - -2.02) and physical function (-2.4; 95% CI -4.00 - -0.80). Global mental health was similar (-1.0; 95% CI -2.21 - 0.21). CONCLUSIONS Post-EVAR patients do not experience more anxiety just before receiving surveillance imaging results than outside this period, but do suffer from more anxiety and worse physical outcomes than the 65+ Dutch population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C M Geraedts
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S Mulay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A C Vahl
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ç Ünlü
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - D T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J W Koelemay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Balm
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hicks CW, Vavra AK, Goldsborough E, Rebuffatti M, Almeida J, Duwayri YM, Haurani M, Ross CB, Shah SK, Shireman PK, Smolock CJ, Yi J, Woo K. Current status of patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:1693-1706.e1. [PMID: 34688398 PMCID: PMC9834908 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
A previously published review focused on generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to vascular surgery but limited to arterial conditions. The objective of this project was to identify all available PROMs relevant to diseases treated by vascular surgeons and to evaluate vascular surgeon perceptions, barriers to widespread implementation, and concerns regarding PROMs. We provide an overview of what a PROM is and how they are developed, and summarize currently available PROMs specific to vascular surgeons. We also report results from a survey of 78 Society for Vascular Surgery members serving on committees within the Policy and Advocacy Council addressing the barriers and facilitators to using PROMs in clinical practice. Finally, we report the qualitative results of two focus groups conducted to assess granular perceptions of PROMS and preparedness of vascular surgeons for widespread implementation of PROMs. These focus groups identified a lack of awareness of existing PROMs, knowledge of how PROMs are developed and validated, and clarity around how PROMs should be used by the clinician as main subthemes for barriers to PROM implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin W Hicks
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Ashley K Vavra
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | | | - Michelle Rebuffatti
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Jose Almeida
- Miami Vein and Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fl
| | - Yazan M Duwayri
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Mounir Haurani
- Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Charles B Ross
- Vascular Center of Excellence, Piedmont Heart and Vascular Institute, Piedmont Healthcare, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Samir K Shah
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fl
| | - Paula K Shireman
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, Tex; Department of Surgery, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Tex
| | - Christopher J Smolock
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jeniann Yi
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colo
| | - Karen Woo
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bulder RMA, Hamming JF, van Schaik J, Lindeman JHN. Towards Patient Centred Outcomes for Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Scoping Review of Quality of Life Scales. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62:630-641. [PMID: 34479768 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In order to better incorporate the patient's perspective in medical decision making, core outcome sets (COS) are being defined. In the field of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), efforts to capture the patient's perspective focus on generic quantitative quality of life (QoL) scales. The question arises whether these quantitative scales adequately reflect the patient's perspective on QoL, and whether they can be included in the QoL aspect of COS. A scoping review of QoL assessment in the context of elective AAA repair was undertaken. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Articles reporting QoL assessment in the context of elective AAA repair were identified. Quantitative studies (i.e., traditional QoL scales) were aligned (triangulation approach) with qualitative studies (i.e., patient perspective) to identify parallels and discrepancies. Mean Short Form 36 item survey (SF-36) scores were pooled using a random effects model to evaluate sensitivity to change. RESULTS Thirty-three studies were identified, of which 29 (88%) were quantitative and four (12%) qualitative. The 33 studies reported a total of 54 quantitative QoL scales; the most frequently used were the generic SF-36 (16 studies) and five dimension EuroQol (EQ-5D; eight studies). Aneurysm specific scales were reported by one study. The generic quantitative scales showed poor alignment with the patient's perspective. The aneurysm specific scales better aligned but missed "concerns regarding symptoms" and "the impact of possible outcomes/complications". "Self control and decision making", which was brought forward by patients in qualitative studies, was not captured in any of the current scales. CONCLUSION There is no established tool that fully captures all aspects of the patient's perspective appropriate for a COS for elective AAA repair. In order to fulfil the need for a COS for the management of, AAA disease, a more comprehensive overview of the patient's perspective is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth M A Bulder
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap F Hamming
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan van Schaik
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H N Lindeman
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Michaels J, Wilson E, Maheswaran R, Radley S, Jones G, Tong TS, Kaltenthaler E, Aber A, Booth A, Buckley Woods H, Chilcott J, Duncan R, Essat M, Goka E, Howard A, Keetharuth A, Lumley E, Nawaz S, Paisley S, Palfreyman S, Poku E, Phillips P, Rooney G, Thokala P, Thomas S, Tod A, Wickramasekera N, Shackley P. Configuration of vascular services: a multiple methods research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Vascular services is changing rapidly, having emerged as a new specialty with its own training and specialised techniques. This has resulted in the need for reconfiguration of services to provide adequate specialist provision and accessible and equitable services.
Objectives
To identify the effects of service configuration on practice, resource use and outcomes. To model potential changes in configuration. To identify and/or develop electronic data collection tools for collecting patient-reported outcome measures and other clinical information. To evaluate patient preferences for aspects of services other than health-related quality of life.
Design
This was a multiple methods study comprising multiple systematic literature reviews; the development of a new outcome measure for users of vascular services (the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular) based on the reviews, qualitative studies and psychometric evaluation; a trade-off exercise to measure process utilities; Hospital Episode Statistics analysis; and the development of individual disease models and a metamodel of service configuration.
Setting
Specialist vascular inpatient services in England.
Data sources
Modelling and Hospital Episode Statistics analysis for all vascular inpatients in England from 2006 to 2018. Qualitative studies and electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular evaluation with vascular patients from the Sheffield area. The trade-off studies were based on a societal sample from across England.
Interventions
The data analysis, preference studies and modelling explored the effect of different potential arrangements for service provision on the resource use, workload and outcomes for all interventions in the three main areas of inpatient vascular treatment: peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm and carotid artery disease. The electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular was evaluated as a potential tool for clinical data collection and outcome monitoring.
Main outcome measures
Systematic reviews assessed quality and psychometric properties of published outcome measures for vascular disease and the relationship between volume and outcome in vascular services. The electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular development considered face and construct validity, test–retest reliability and responsiveness. Models were validated using case studies from previous reconfigurations and comparisons with Hospital Episode Statistics data. Preference studies resulted in estimates of process utilities for aneurysm treatment and for travelling distances to access services.
Results
Systematic reviews provided evidence of an association between increasing volume of activity and improved outcomes for peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm and carotid artery disease. Reviews of existing patient-reported outcome measures did not identify suitable condition-specific tools for incorporation in the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular. Reviews of qualitative evidence, primary qualitative studies and a Delphi exercise identified the issues to be incorporated into the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular, resulting in a questionnaire with one generic and three disease-specific domains. After initial item reduction, the final version has 55 items in eight scales and has acceptable psychometric properties. The preference studies showed strong preference for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment (willingness to trade up to 0.135 quality-adjusted life-years) and for local services (up to 0.631 quality-adjusted life-years). A simulation model with a web-based interface was developed, incorporating disease-specific models for abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease and carotid artery disease. This predicts the effects of specified reconfigurations on workload, resource use, outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Initial exploration suggested that further reconfiguration of services in England to accomplish high-volume centres would result in improved outcomes, within the bounds of cost-effectiveness usually considered acceptable in the NHS.
Limitations
The major source of evidence to populate the models was Hospital Episode Statistics data, which have limitations owing to the complexity of the data, deficiencies in the coding systems and variations in coding practice. The studies were not able to address all of the potential barriers to change where vascular services are not compliant with current NHS recommendations.
Conclusions
There is evidence of potential for improvement in the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vascular services through further centralisation of sites where major vascular procedures are undertaken. Preferences for local services are strong, and this may be addressed through more integrated services, with a range of services being provided more locally. The use of a web-based tool for the collection of clinical data and patient-reported outcome measures is feasible and can provide outcome data for clinical use and service evaluation.
Future work
Further evaluation of the economic models in real-world situations where local vascular service reconfiguration is under consideration and of the barriers to change where vascular services do not meet NHS recommendations for service configuration is needed. Further work on the electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire – Vascular is required to assess its acceptability and usefulness in clinical practice and to develop appropriate report formats for clinical use and service evaluation. Further studies to assess the implications of including non-health-related preferences for care processes, and location of services, in calculations of cost-effectiveness are required.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016042570, CRD42016042573, CRD42016042574, CRD42016042576, CRD42016042575, CRD42014014850, CRD42015023877 and CRD42015024820.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Michaels
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emma Wilson
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ravi Maheswaran
- Department of Public Health, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stephen Radley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Georgina Jones
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Thai-Son Tong
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eva Kaltenthaler
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ahmed Aber
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Buckley Woods
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - James Chilcott
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rosie Duncan
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Munira Essat
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Goka
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aoife Howard
- Department of Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Lumley
- Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shah Nawaz
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Suzy Paisley
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Edith Poku
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Patrick Phillips
- Cancer Clinical Trials Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gill Rooney
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Praveen Thokala
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steven Thomas
- Department of Vascular Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Angela Tod
- Division of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nyantara Wickramasekera
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Phil Shackley
- Health Economics & Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease remains a major source of morbidity in developed countries and can progress to life-threatening rupture if left untreated, with exceedingly high mortality. The goal of AAA management is to identify and electively repair AAAs before rupture. AAA disease burden and outcomes have improved over time with declining tobacco use and advancements in care across patients' disease course. The introduction of endovascular AAA repair, in particular, has allowed for elective AAA repair in patients previously considered too high risk for open surgery and has contributed to lower rates of AAA rupture over time. However, these improved outcomes are not universally experienced, and disparities continue to exist in the detection, treatment, and outcomes of AAA by sex, race, and ethnicity. Mitigating these disparities requires enhanced, focused efforts at preventing disease, promoting health, and delivering appropriate care among an increasingly diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Marcaccio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 5B, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street, Suite 5B, Boston, MA 02215.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lane T, Onida S, Davies A. Comment on: Strength of public preferences for endovascular or open aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2020; 107:613. [PMID: 32187677 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Lane
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Onida
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - A Davies
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Romaine J, Peach G, Thompson M, Hinchliffe RJ, Bradley C. Psychometric validation of three new condition-specific questionnaires to assess quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction of patients with aortic aneurysm. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:29. [PMID: 31098754 PMCID: PMC6522591 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the psychometric properties of three new condition-specific questionnaires designed to assess outcomes amongst patients under pre-operative surveillance for a small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or who have undergone aneurysm repair. These tools are the Aneurysm-Dependent Quality of Life measure (AneurysmDQoL), the Aneurysm Symptom Rating Questionnaire (AneurysmSRQ) and the Aneurysm Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (AneurysmTSQ). RESULTS The questionnaires were sent to 297 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or who had undergone AAA repair (using open or endovascular technique) sampled from five UK NHS Trusts. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used to examine factor structure together with reliability analysis. A subset of 65 patients completed the questionnaires a second time four months later. One hundred and ninety-seven patients (178 men; 18 women) provided data for analysis (69% response rate): mean age was 75 years (range 60-95). Nineteen were under pre-operative surveillance for AAA and 178 had undergone AAA repair (70 open repair; 104 endovascular repair; 4 uncertain). Exploratory Factor Analysis of the AneurysmDQoL and the AneurysmTSQ each demonstrated a one-factor structure. The AneurysmSRQ demonstrated a six-factor structure (emotional, weight loss, lower limb, cognitive, general malaise and gastrointestinal symptoms) and a one-factor composite symptom scale. All scales have clean factor structures: item loadings above 0.40, no cross-loadings, and no factors with fewer than three items. Internal consistency reliability was excellent (α = 0.869-0.959) and test-retest reliability good (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70-0.88). CONCLUSIONS The three new questionnaires have a clear structure and strong reliability and are now ready for use in clinical trials and routine practice, which will allow evaluation of responsiveness to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacquelyn Romaine
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Orchard Building, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
| | - George Peach
- St George's Vascular Institute, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Matt Thompson
- Endologix Inc and Adjunctive Professor, School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Robert J Hinchliffe
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, NIHR Bristol BRC, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Clare Bradley
- Health Psychology Research Unit, Orchard Building, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.,Health Psychology Research Ltd - Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shan L, Saxena A, Goh D, Robinson D. A systematic review on the quality of life and functional status after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in elderly patients with an average age older than 75 years. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69:1268-1281. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
12
|
Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, Dick F, van Herwaarden J, Karkos C, Koelemay M, Kölbel T, Loftus I, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell J, Szeberin Z, ESVS Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Chakfe N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Kakkos S, Koncar I, Kolh P, Lindholt JS, de Vega M, Vermassen F, Document reviewers, Björck M, Cheng S, Dalman R, Davidovic L, Donas K, Earnshaw J, Eckstein HH, Golledge J, Haulon S, Mastracci T, Naylor R, Ricco JB, Verhagen H. Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 57:8-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 873] [Impact Index Per Article: 174.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
13
|
Doyen B, Bicknell CD, Riga CV, Van Herzeele I. Evidence Based Training Strategies to Improve Clinical Practice in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 56:751-758. [PMID: 30206016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Doyen
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Colin D Bicknell
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Celia V Riga
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Isabelle Van Herzeele
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Setacci C, Sirignano P, Fineschi V, Frati P, Ricci G, Speziale F. A clinical and ethical review on late results and benefits after EVAR. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2017; 16:1-6. [PMID: 28275425 PMCID: PMC5328746 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this review is to assess if late mortality after endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is a real problem, and whether it could be an issue in the case of medical litigation. Material and methods A review of all English language literature was performed on PubMed web-site, looking for all papers reporting EVAR long-term mortality rate. EVAR performances were reviewed also from an ethical and medico-legal point of view, based on current Italian laws. Results Mono-centric studies, and international registers suggest that today EVAR offers similar (if not better) results than open repair (OR) in the treatment of AAAs with standard and complex anatomies, even if performed outside the devices-specific instructions for use. In contrast, large randomized trials, and consequently current guidelines, suggest that EVAR still has an ancillary role compared to OR, only to be used for highly selected patients. Recently, specific litigation cases on surgical options related to the treatment of aortic aneurysms has developed. The informed consent process needs to include not only mortality and major complications related to the procedure but also the chance of patients' outcomes. For those reasons, the generic nature of informed consent has been criticized. Conclusions No conclusive data is currently available to assess the initial question of late mortality after EVAR but results are still improving. In the meantime, widespread use of EVAR as first choice for treating AAA may only be acceptable in high-volume centres validating their results by a strict follow up protocol. The long-term results after endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are still considered one of the main limitations of this treatment option. This paper is a comprehensive review of the current literature on long-term mortality after EVAR procedures. An analysis on informed consent for EVAR from a non-surgical point of view is reported for the very first time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Setacci
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Pasqualino Sirignano
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery "Paride Stefanini", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Vittorio Fineschi
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy; Neuromed, Istituto Mediterraneo Neurologico (IRCCS) di Pozzili, Italy
| | - Paola Frati
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy; Neuromed, Istituto Mediterraneo Neurologico (IRCCS) di Pozzili, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Speziale
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery "Paride Stefanini", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Duncan R, Essat M, Jones G, Booth A, Buckley Woods H, Poku E, Kaltenthaler E, Keetharuth AD, Palfreyman S, Michaels J. Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of patient-reported outcome measures for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2016; 104:317-327. [PMID: 27935014 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to identify and evaluate existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to inform the selection for use in surgical practice. METHODS Two reviews were conducted: a systematic review to identify valid, reliable and acceptable PROMs for patients with an AAA, and a qualitative evidence synthesis to assess the relevance to patients of the identified PROM items. PROM studies were evaluated for their psychometric properties using established assessment criteria, and for their methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist. Qualitative studies were synthesized using framework analysis, and concepts identified were then triangulated using a protocol with the item concepts of the identified PROMs. RESULTS Four PROMs from three studies were identified in the first review: Short Form 36, Australian Vascular Quality of Life Index, Aneurysm Dependent Quality of Life (AneurysmDQoL) and Aneurysm Symptoms Rating Questionnaire (AneurysmSRQ). None of the identified PROMs had undergone a rigorous psychometric evaluation within the AAA population. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which 28 concepts important to patients with an AAA were identified. The AneurysmDQoL and AneurysmSRQ together provided the most comprehensive assessment of these concepts. Fear of rupture, control, ability to forget about the condition and size of aneurysm were all concepts identified in the qualitative studies but not covered by items in the identified PROMs. CONCLUSION Further research is needed to develop PROMs for AAA that are reliable, valid and acceptable to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Duncan
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Essat
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - G Jones
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - A Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - H Buckley Woods
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - E Poku
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - E Kaltenthaler
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - A D Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Palfreyman
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Michaels
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|