Risk of malignancy in resected pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms

Reducing the burden of pancreatic cancer by surveilling mucinous cystic neoplasms: are we there yet?

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms are a common condition, with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) being of particular concern due to their potential for malignant transformation. Resection of these lesions before progression to invasive cancer represents a crucial opportunity to reduce the burden of pancreatic cancer. However, the benefit of early-resection must be weighed against the risk of overtreatment. Applying current guidelines, nearly half of the patients who undergo resection for IPMN might not have required surgery, while malignancy is detected in only 16 % of resected MCNs. This raises concerns, particularly given the increasing detection of small cysts with the widespread use of radiological imaging and the significant postoperative risks, including exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Emerging evidence suggests that surveillance strategies could be more broadly applied, reducing unnecessary surgeries. This review aims to reassess the current evidence regarding both surgical resection and surveillance of IPMNs and MCNs.

Cost-effectiveness of Operative Intervention for Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm: The Role of Postoperative Diabetes

OBJECTIVES

Small mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) of the pancreas are managed with operative resection in otherwise healthy patients; however, postoperative diabetes development is not considered in recommendations for resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Via probabilistic microsimulation Markov modeling, we assessed clinical and economic implications of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) versus surveillance for non-diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with suspected MCN of 2 cm without high-risk or worrisome features. Primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), medical costs (2021 USD), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of our model to changes in input parameters. All analyses were repeated for a population with pre-DM.

RESULTS

Surveillance resulted in 6.52 QALYs and $61,200, while LDP accumulated 6.12 QALYs and $63,700. Almost 20% of the LDP cohort developed DM over the first 10 years, compared with 11% of the surveillance cohort. In a pre-DM cohort, LDP remained dominated in the base case, with over 40% developing DM postoperatively. In sensitivity analyses, surveillance remained the preferred strategy in most iterations for both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance for small suspected MCNs without high-risk features is the preferred strategy from a clinical and economic standpoint. Consensus guidelines should consider the long-term implications of postoperative diabetes development after LDP.

Next-generation sequencing improves diagnostic accuracy of imaging and carcinoembryonic antigen alone for pancreatic cystic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

New tools are needed to determine the pancreatic cysts that require surgical resection. This study aimed to evaluate whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) is useful for identifying mucinous, malignant, or pre-malignant cysts leading to surgery.

METHODS

Laboratory, cytological, and histological data from 97 patients with worrisome features on imaging or an unclear pancreatic cystic lesion (PCL) who were indicated for further investigation and who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed. A multidisciplinary team evaluated MRI, CT, EUS-FNA, and NGS findings.

RESULTS

Among the 40 mucinous cysts, 53 % had KRAS and/or GNAS mutations, yielding a sensitivity of 53 % and specificity of 92 % compared to 33 and 100 % for cytology and 53 and 89 % for cystic fluid CEA. Combining NGS findings with CEA levels increased sensitivity and specificity in detecting mucinous lesions to 78 and 87 %, respectively. Surgically treated high-grade dysplasia PCLs did not show worrisome mutations in cyst fluid, while 80 % of the malignant lesions had mutations typical for advanced lesions. The advanced neoplasias showed 95 % specificity for worrisome gene mutations, with the highest diagnostic accuracy observed for NGS mutations, achieving an AUC of 0.777 in the ROC curve analysis compared to 0.631 for CEA. Patients with worrisome gene mutations were offered surgical treatment. NGS results contributed to the decision to operate in 11 out of 23 cases. In 71 % of all cases, NGS supported the diagnosis, with 3 % false positives and 12 % false negatives.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid demonstrates high specificity and may serve as an additional diagnostic tool to CEA. Combining cystic fluid CEA and NGS increases the accuracy in determining whether a lesion is mucinous and NGS showed a higher diagnostic accuracy in advanced lesions compared to CEA. While the absence of alarming NGS findings should not preclude surgical treatment, patients with alarming mutations should be considered for surgery.

Rare tumours of the pancreas: monocentric study

PURPOSE

The biology of rare pancreatic tumours, which differs from that of ductal pancreatic cancer, requires increased attention. Although the majority of rare pancreatic tumours are benign, it is difficult to decide whether an invasive component exists without complete removal of the lesion, despite considerable progress in diagnosis. We are investigating a large cohort of patients with histologically confirmed epithelial non-ductal non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas.

METHODS

Here we analyze long-term survival from patients, who underwent resection of histologically confirmed epithelial non-ductal non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. At our department between Jan 1st, 1999, and Dec 31st, 2019. The median follow-up was 61 (range 0-168) month. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) software.

RESULTS

46 patients (48%) were followed up for more than 5 years, 18 patients (19%) for more than 10 years. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates for rare non-invasive pancreatic tumours were 72% and 55% respectively. The proportion of rare tumour entities (non-ductal and non-neuroendocrine) increased continuously and statistically significantly (p = 0.004) from 4.2 to 12.3% in our clinic between 1999 and 2019. If there is no invasive growth yet, there is a varying risk of malignant degeneration in the course of the disease. Therefore, the indication for pancreatic resection is still the subject of discussion.

CONCLUSION

The long-term prognosis of rare epithelial pancreatic tumours after R0 resection-even if they are already malignant-is much better than that of ductal pancreatic cancer.

Clinical Perspectives on the Histomolecular Features of the Pancreatic Precursor Lesions: A Narrative Review

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal cancer with poor prognoses. Identifying and characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) in the early detection and follow-up plans is thought to help detect pancreatic malignancy. Besides, the molecular features of PCLs are thought to unravel potentials for targeted therapies. We present a narrative review of the existing literature on the role of PCLs in the early detection, risk stratification, and medical management of PC. High-grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) stage III are high-risk lesions for developing PC. These lesions often require thorough histomolecular characterization using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), before a surgical decision is made. EUS is also useful in the risk assessment of PCLs with tentative plans-for instance, in branch-duct IPMNs (BD-IPMN)- where the final decision might change. Besides the operative decisions, recent improvements in the application of targeted therapies are expected to improve survival measures. Knowledge of molecular features has helped develop targeted therapies. In summary, the histomolecular characterization of PCLs is helpful in optimizing management plans in PC. Further improvements are still needed for the broad application of this knowledge in the clinical setting.

It is not necessary to resect all mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: current guidelines do not reflect the actual risk of malignancy

BACKGROUND

Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas are premalignant cysts for which current guidelines support pancreatic resection. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to define the pooled rate of malignancy for MCN.

METHODS

A systematic review of eligible studies published between 2000 and 2021 was performed on PubMed and Embase. Primary outcome was rate of malignancy. Data regarding high-risk features, including cyst size and mural nodules, were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies and 3292 patients with resected MCN were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of malignancy was 16.1% (95%CI 13.1-19.0). The rate of malignant MCN in studies published before 2012 was significantly higher than that of studies published after recent guidelines were published (21.0% vs 14.9%, p < 0.001). Malignant MCN were larger than benign (mean difference 25.9 mm 95%CI 14.50-37.43, p < 0.001) with a direct correlation between size and presence of malignant MCN (R2 = 0.28, p = 0.020). A SROC identified a threshold of 65 mm to be associated with the diagnosis of malignant MCN. Presence of mural nodules was associated with the diagnosis of a malignant MCN (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 3.00-6.29, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Whereas guidelines recommend resection of all MCN, the rate of malignancy in resected MCN is 16%, implying that surveillance has a role in most cases, and that surgical selection criteria are warranted. Size and presence of mural nodules are significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant degeneration, small MCN and without mural nodules can be considered for surveillance.

Innovation in the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Same Operations, Narrower Indications, and an Individualized Approach to Decision-Making

Historically, the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) has been operative. Early intervention for premalignant lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), offers an opportunity to prevent pancreatic cancer-with potential decrement to patients' short-term and long-term health. The operations performed have remained fundamentally the same, with most patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy using oncologic principles. The role of parenchymal-sparing resection and total pancreatectomy remains controversial. We review innovations in the surgical management of PCN, focusing on the evolution of evidence-based guidelines, short-term and long-term outcomes, and individualized risk-benefit assessment.

CYSTIC PANCREATIC LESIONS: IMAGING VERSUS ANATOMOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS-HOW TO IMPROVE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cystic lesions are a group of pancreatic neoplasms with different behavior and risk of malignancy. Imaging diagnosis and differentiation of these lesions remain a challenge.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging and post-operative pathologic diagnoses of Pancreatic cystic lesions in a University Hospital of São Paulo State.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with surgically diagnosed Pancreatic cystic lesions were enrolled, as a study cohort from 2009 to 2019. Preoperative radiological and final pathological diagnosis was correlated to measure computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, choledochal pancreatic cyst, mucinous cystadenoma, serous cystadenoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, and pancreatic pseudocyst were classified as neoplastic cysts.

RESULTS

It was noted that 27 patients (69.23%) had preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, 11 patients (28.20%) had preoperative computed tomography only, and 1 patient had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging only. The values for diagnoses made only with computed tomography (p=0.47) and from the combination of computed tomography+magnetic resonance imaging (p=0.50) did also point to moderate agreement with the anatomopathological findings. The values pointed to a fair agreement for the diagnosis of mucinous cystadenoma (p=0.3), moderate agreement for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (p= 0.41), good agreement for serous cystadenoma (p=0.79), and excellent agreement for choledochal pancreatic cyst (p=1), pancreatic pseudocyst (p=0.84), and Frantz tumor (p=1) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging have an equivalent diagnostic agreement with an anatomopathological diagnosis for differentiating benign from malignant Pancreatic cystic lesions and in suggesting a specific diagnosis. There is no statistical difference between the use of computed tomography alone and computed tomography+magnetic resonance imaging in the improvement of diagnostic accuracy.

When to Stop Surveillance: Pancreatic Cysts

Surveillance of mucinous pancreatic cysts is a key to reducing pancreatic cancer risk and detecting malignancy early. However, while the management of cysts with high-risk and worrisome features is fairly straightforward, surveillance of patients with low-risk branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms has long presented gastroenterologists with the challenging question of discontinuation of surveillance. Up-to-date evidence supports the cessation of follow-up in these patients depending on both interval stability of the cyst and cyst size. Based on these criteria, discontinuation of surveillance at either 5 years or 10 years is recommended. Oversurveillance of patients with pancreatic cysts in the absence of high-risk and worrisome features is discouraged.

Identification of high-risk features in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are uncommon tumors that have the potential of becoming cancer. There is no consensus regarding the high-risk features of these tumors. Our study aimed to identify the preoperative demographic, clinical, or radiologic factors that can predict the presence of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

METHODS

We identified 157 patients who underwent resection and fulfilled the pathologic criteria for mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas in a prospectively maintained database spanning 3 decades (1990-2020). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

RESULTS

The rate of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma was 11%. Tumor size ≥4 cm (P < .001), mural nodularity (P = .04), and a serum CA 19-9 level >37 U/mL (P < .001) were associated with high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. In the multivariable analysis, tumor size ≥4 cm (odds ratio 16.9, 95% confidence interval 2.04-140, P = .009) and a CA 19-9 level >37 U/mL (odds ratio 5.68, 95% confidence interval 1.52-21.3, P = .010) were predictors of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. There were no tumors with high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in patients with tumor size <4 cm in the absence of an elevated CA 19-9 or mural nodularity.

CONCLUSION

Tumors with a size ≥4 cm and/or a high CA 19-9 level should be considered for prompt surgical resection. Conversely, tumors <4 cm with no other high-risk features have a negligible risk for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma and may benefit from nonoperative surveillance. Mural nodularity is an additional suspicious feature. These findings may contribute to future guidelines.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: A Concise Review

Pancreatic cystic lesions are being discovered as incidental lesions during cross-sectional imaging studies of the abdomen with increasing frequency. Endoscopic ultrasound is an important diagnostic modality for managing pancreatic cystic lesions. There are various types of pancreatic cystic lesions, from benign to malignant. Endoscopic ultrasound has a multifactorial role in delineating the morphology of pancreatic cystic lesions, ranging from fluid and tissue acquisition for analysis-fine needle aspiration and through-the-needle biopsy, respectively-to advanced imaging techniques, such as contrast-harmonic mode endoscopic ultrasound and EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. In this review, we will summarize and provide an update on the specific role of EUS in the management of pancreatic cystic lesions.

[Indications for the surgical management of pancreatic neoplasms]

Due to its rising incidence, pancreatic neoplasia, which mainly include adenocarcinomas, neuroendocrine and cystic neoplasia of the pancreas, is becoming increasingly relevant in everyday clinical practice.Based on a systematic literature search, a working group of pancreatic experts developed evidence-based recommendations for surgical indications in pancreatic neoplasia to improve the quality.There is a clear surgical indication for primary or secondary resectable pancreatic carcinomas without metastasis, for functionally active, symptomatic and functionally inactive neuroendocrine neoplasia of more than 2 cm in size and for cystic neoplasm with symptoms or signs of malignancy including all intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) of the main duct and mixed type, all mucinous-cystic neoplasia (MCN) > 4 cm and all solid pseudopapillary neoplasia (SPN). Surgery can be indicated for pancreatic carcinomas with isolated arterial vascular infiltration or for long periods of stable oligometastasis, regarding neuroendocrine neoplasias for metastasis or debulking surgery as well as for branch-duct IPMN with risk criteria and MCN <4 cm. There is no primary indication for surgery in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer or asymptomatic serous-cystic neoplasia (SCN).The indication for surgery should always be individualized taking into account age, comorbidities and patient wishes.

Integrating Molecular Analysis into the Pathologic Evaluation of Pancreatic Cysts

The development of cross-sectional imaging techniques has enhanced the detection of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). PCLs are found in approximately 2% of the general population, often as incidentally detected lesions on computed tomography or MRI during the evaluation of other medical conditions. Broadly, PCLs are classified as mucinous or nonmucinous. Mucinous PCLs include mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Nonmucinous PCLs include pseudocysts, serous cystadenomas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, and cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, as well as cystic acinar cell carcinoma, cystic degeneration of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, lymphoepithelial cyst, and others.

Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms

Early detection of high-risk pancreatic cystic lesions enables potentially curative surgical resection, and early detection of lesions without worrisome features may lead to appropriate surveillance. Regrettably, differentiating premalignant and malignant cysts from nonmalignant ones remains challenging. However, emerging additional diagnostic tools, including the needle biopsy with microforceps and needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, are of exciting potential along with cyst fluid analysis".

[Pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions-Diagnostics, treatment and follow-up care : Current recommendations taking the current German S3 guidelines on pancreatic cancer into account]

Due to their increased detection pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions are becoming increasingly relevant in the clinical routine and represent a morphologically and biologically heterogeneous and thus clinically demanding as well as potentially (pre)malignant entity. As a result, recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of pancreatic cystic tumors have now been incorporated into the current German S3 guidelines on pancreatic cancer. The diagnostics of pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions are based on the following three elements: collection of relevant clinical information, performance of high-resolution imaging procedures and if diagnostic uncertainty persists, puncture diagnostics. Differentiated diagnostics are of essential importance as these represent the basis for an adequate treatment decision. Pancreatic cystic lesions with a relevant risk of malignant transformation, e.g., main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), followed by mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) and generally pancreatic cystic lesions with risk factors independent of the entity, should be resected, whereas a differentiated and individualized approach is necessary, especially for branch-duct IPMNs. The serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) have no malignant potential and do not require any treatment if they are asymptomatic. Important principles in surgery of pancreatic cancer, such as adequate surgical resection taking oncological standards into account and standardized appropriate histopathological processing of the specimens as well as intraoperative frozen section analysis also play an important role in pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions. An annual follow-up seems to be meaningful, especially for IPMNs.

Pancreatic incidentalomas: Investigation and management

The incidence of pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) detected in otherwise asymptomatic patients is growing with the increasing quality and use of advanced imaging techniques. PI can present as isolated main pancreatic duct dilation or as a solid or cystic lesion. Although historically thought to be relatively rare, PIs are rather common, particularly cystic lesions of the pancreas, which can be detected in up to 49% of the general population. With the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer, PIs are an opportunity for prevention and early diagnosis, but when managed poorly, they can also lead to overtreatment and unnecessary morbidity. The management of PI should begin with a dedicated pancreas protocol computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to accurately characterize duct size, lesion characteristics and establish an accurate baseline for subsequent follow up. Diagnosis and subsequent management depends on the extent of main duct dilation and solid versus cystic appearance. Solid lesions are highly concerning for malignancy. Cystic lesions can be further categorized as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) or mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), both of which harbour malignant potential, or as serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) that are benign. In this paper, we summarize the major challenges related to PI and present pragmatic suggestions for management.

Actual malignancy risk of either operated or non-operated presumed mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas under surveillance

BACKGROUND

Despite the low malignant potential of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), surgery is still performed. The aim of this pragmatic study was to assess the outcome of surgery and surveillance for patients presenting with a presumed MCN at the first evaluation.

METHODS

Data for patients with a presumed MCN observed from 2000 to 2016 at the Verona Pancreas Institute and San Raffaele Hospital were extracted from prospective databases. The endpoints were risk of malignancy at pathology and rate of misdiagnosis for the surgical series, expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with 95 per cent confidence interval, and disease-specific survival (DSS) for the surveillance cohort investigated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 424 patients were identified. In the surgical series (229 patients), the rate of misdiagnosis was 19.2 per cent. The rate of malignant MCNs was 10.9 per cent (25 patients). The overall rate of malignancy, including misdiagnoses, was 11.3 per cent (26 patients). Predictors of malignancy were mural nodules (OR 27.75, 95 per cent c.i. 4.44-173.61; P < 0.001), size at least 50 mm (OR 13.39, 2.01 to 89.47; P = 0.007), and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 level (OR 3.98, 1.19 to 13.30; P = 0.025). In the absence of mural nodules and enhancing walls, none of the resected presumed MCNs smaller than 50 mm were malignant. Only patients with high-risk stigmata undergoing surgery experienced a significantly reduced 5-year DSS compared with all other patients (88 versus 100 per cent; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Presumed MCNs with mural nodules, enhancing walls or cysts of 50 mm or larger should be considered for upfront surgical resection owing to the high risk of malignancy. In the absence of these features, the incidence of malignancy is negligible, favouring surveillance in selected patients given the low risk of malignancy and the high rate of misdiagnosis.

LAY SUMMARY

Malignant degeneration of presumed pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms takes several years, if it occurs at all. Mural nodules, enhancing walls or cysts of 50 mm or larger call for surgical resection owing to an increased risk of malignancy; otherwise, surveillance seems a good option.

Pathologic T1 and T2 encapsulated invasive carcinomas arising from mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas have favorable prognosis and might be treated conservatively

Carcinoma arising from a mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of the pancreas is termed MCN with associated invasive carcinoma (MCN-AIC) in the fifth WHO classification of digestive tumors (2019). The prognosis of this malignancy varies depending on the relationship of the invasive carcinoma to the cyst capsule, but limited data are available. This study identified 165 surgically resected MCNs including 15 MCN-AICs from a single center between 2008 and 2018 and analyzed their clinicopathologic features. The results confirmed that non-invasive MCNs were completely cured by surgery. All MCN-AICs showing an encapsulated invasion pattern (defined as invasive carcinoma limited to the ovarian-type stroma, cystic septa, and capsule) had an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 100%, even when the size of the invasive component was up to stage T2. By contrast, MCN-AICs with extracapsular involvement had unfavorable clinical outcomes. Our study demonstrates that the pattern of invasion of MCN-AIC can predict patient prognosis. Pathologic stage T1 and T2 encapsulated MCN-AICs may be completely cured with surgical resection alone or when combined with postoperative chemotherapy.

MRI is useful to suggest and exclude malignancy in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of MRI in differentiating benign (b-MCN) and malignant (m-MCN) MCN. European guidelines suggest that certain mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas can be conservatively managed.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of consecutive patients with resected MCN. MRIs were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to the pathological results. The authors compared b-MCN (i.e., mucinous-cystadenoma comprising high-grade dysplasia (HGD)) and m-MCN (i.e., cystadenocarcinoma).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (62 women [98%]) with 63 MCN (6 m-MCN, 2 HGD) were included. m-MCN tumors had a tendency to be larger than b-MCN (median 86 [25-103] vs. 45 [17-130] mm, p = .055). The combination of signal heterogeneity on T2-weighted imaging, wall thickness ≥ 5 mm, the presence of mural nodules ≥ 9 mm, and enhancing septa had an area under the ROC curve of 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-1.00) for the diagnosis of m-MCN. A total of 24 (37%), 20 (32%), 10 (16%), 5 (8%), and 4 (6%) out of 63 MCNs showed 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 of these features, respectively. The corresponding rate of m-MCN was 0%, 0%, 10%, 20%, and 100%, respectively, with a good-to-excellent inter-reader agreement. Patterns with a high NPV for m-MCN included an absence of enhancing septa or walls (NPV 97% and 100%, respectively), wall thickness < 3 mm (NPV 100%), and no mural nodules (NPV 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of 4 imaging features suggests malignant MCN on MRI. On the other hand, visualization of a thin non-enhancing wall with no mural nodules suggests benign MCN.

KEY POINTS

• A heterogenous signal on T2-weighted MRI, a ≥ 5-mm-thick wall, mural nodules ≥ 9 mm, and/or enhancing septa suggest malignant MCNs. • A thin non-enhancing wall with no mural nodules suggests benign MCNs. • MRI should be performed in the pre-therapeutic evaluation of MCN to help determine the therapeutic strategy in these patients.

Ductal Dilatation of ≥5 mm in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Should Trigger the Consideration for Pancreatectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Resected Cases

Simple Summary

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are common but difficult to manage since accurate tools for diagnosing malignancy are unavailable. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter for detecting IPMN malignancy, using a meta-analysis of published data. The result suggests that malignancy is highly prevalent in IPMN with ductal dilatation of >5 mm.

Abstract

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are common but difficult to manage since accurate tools for diagnosing malignancy are unavailable. This study tests the diagnostic value of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter for detecting IPMN malignancy using a meta-analysis of published data of resected IPMNs. Collected from a comprehensive literature search, the articles included in this analysis must report malignancy cases (high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and invasive carcinoma (IC)) and MPD diameter so that two MPD cut-offs could be created. The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios of the two cutoffs for predicting malignancy were calculated. A review of 1493 articles yielded 20 retrospective studies with 3982 resected cases. A cutoff of ≥5 mm is more sensitive than the ≥10 mm cutoff and has pooled sensitivity of 72.20% and 75.60% for classification of HGD and IC, respectively. Both MPD cutoffs of ≥5 mm and ≥10 mm were associated with malignancy (OR = 4.36 (95% CI: 2.82, 6.75) vs. OR = 3.18 (95% CI: 2.25, 4.49), respectively). The odds of HGD and IC for patients with MPD ≥5 mm were 5.66 (95% CI: 3.02, 10.62) and 7.40 (95% CI: 4.95, 11.06), respectively. OR of HGD and IC for MPD ≥10 mm cutoff were 4.36 (95% CI: 3.20, 5.93) and 4.75 (95% CI: 2.39, 9.45), respectively. IPMN with MPD of >5 mm could very likely be malignant. In selected IPMN patients, pancreatectomy should be considered when MPD is >5 mm.

A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Premalignant Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Pancreatic cystic lesions are an increasingly common clinical finding. They represent a heterogeneous group of lesions that include two of the three known precursors of pancreatic cancer, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN). Given that approximately 8% of pancreatic cancers arise from these lesions, careful surveillance and timely surgery offers an opportunity for early curative resection in a disease with a dismal prognosis. This review summarizes the current evidence and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPMN/MCN. Current pre-operative diagnostic tests in pancreatic cysts are imperfect and a proportion of patients continue to undergo unnecessary surgical resection annually. Balancing cancer prevention while preventing surgical overtreatment, continues to be challenging when managing pancreatic cysts. Cyst fluid molecular markers, such as KRAS, GNAS, VHL, PIK3CA, SMAD4 and TP53, as well as emerging endoscopic technologies such as needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and through the needle microbiopsy forceps demonstrate improved diagnostic accuracy. Differences in management and areas of uncertainty between the guidelines are also discussed, including indications for surgery, surveillance protocols and if and when surveillance can be discontinued.

It's not all about the size-characteristics and risk factors for malignancy of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas

Background

Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas are rare mucin-producing cystic tumors. As they harbor malignant potential, surgical resection is frequently performed. Current guidelines recommend surgery in asymptomatic patients only for MCN exceeding 4 cm. The aim of this study was to identify radiological and clinical risk factors for malignancy in a single-center cohort of MCN.

Methods

All resected MCN from a single high-volume center between 2004 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, preoperative findings, histopathological results, and data on the postoperative course were recorded. Variables associated with malignancy were evaluated using χ² and Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to model predictive capabilities of preoperative tumor marker levels. Furthermore uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed for binary variables. Survival time was plotted as Kaplan-Meier curves and evaluated by log-rank test.

Results

A total of 63 patients were included. Median age was 62 years; 51 (81.0%) of them were women; median tumor size was 3.5 cm (range, 0.5-18.5); 16 (25.4%) of tumors harbored invasive carcinoma and 13 presented intraepithelial dysplasia (20.6%); 7 (43.8%) invasive carcinomas were smaller than 4 cm. All malignant MCN were radiologically suspected of malignancy (calcifications, mural nodules, or wall thickness) preoperatively. Elevated levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were strongly associated with malignancy (odd's ratio 33.600; 7.000-161.270); P<0.001 and odd's ratio 19.250; 3.370-109.970; P<0.001). Other factors associated with malignancy were preoperative weight loss (P=0.015) and higher age (P=0.048). Tumor size, abdominal or back pain or jaundice showed no significant correlation to malignancy in our cohort.

Conclusions

Malignant potential of MCN should not be underestimated and a close clinical and radiological follow-up is mandatory in all suspected cases. This is especially important for small lesions. Risk assessment should not rely only on tumor size but consider all clinical, radiological and laboratory findings of each case. Follow-up should be performed by experienced surgeons and radiologists in high volume centers for pancreatic surgery. Surgery should be performed in all cases in which malignancy is suspected.

[Indications for the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions]

A steady improvement in modern imaging as well as increasing age in society have led to an increasing number of cystic pancreatic tumours being detected. Pancreatic cysts are a clinically challenging entity because they span a broad biological spectrum and their differentiation is often difficult, especially in small tumours. Therefore, they require a differentiated indication for indication of surgery. To determine recommendations for the surgical indication in cystic tumours of the pancreas, a quality committee for pancreatic diseases of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery performed a systematic literature search and created this review. Based on the current evidence, signs of malignancy and high-risk criteria (icterus due to cystic pancreatic duct obstruction in the bile duct, enhancing mural nodules ≥ 5 mm or solid components in the cyst or pancreatic duct ≥ 10 mm), as well as symptoms, are a surgical indication, independently of the cyst entity (except pseudocysts). If the entity of the pancreatic cyst is detectable by diagnostic imaging, all main duct IPMN and IPMN of the mixed type, all MCN > 4 cm and all SPN should be resected. SCN and branch-duct IPMN without worrisome features do not constitute an indication for surgery. The indication of operation in branch-duct IPMN with relative risk criteria and MCN < 4 cm is the subject of current discussions and should be individualised. By defining indication recommendations, the present work aims to improve the indication quality in cystic pancreatic tumours. However, the surgical indication should always be individualised, taking into account age, comorbidities and the patient's wishes.

Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: current evidence and guidelines

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are a heterogeneous group of pancreatic cysts that include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, serous cystic neoplasms and other rare cystic lesions, all with different biological behaviours and variable risk of progression to malignancy. As more pancreatic cysts are incidentally discovered on routine cross-sectional imaging, optimal surveillance for patients with PCN is becoming an increasingly common clinical problem, highlighting the need to balance cancer prevention with the risk of (surgical) overtreatment. This Review summarizes the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of PCN, including the quality of available evidence. Also discussed are the most important differences between the PCN guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association, the International Association of Pancreatology and the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, including diagnostic and follow-up strategies and indications for surgery. Finally, new developments in the management of patients with PCN are addressed.

Management Algorithm for Cystic Pancreatic Lesions

Cystic pancreatic lesions are common findings in an aging society due to an increasing availability of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging. Although the overall prevalence of malignancy and the rate of malignant conversion are low, especially mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm harbor significant malignant potential depending on their morphology and size. Recently updated guidelines recommend sophisticated algorithms for initial workup and surveillance based on individual characteristics of the cystic lesion and the patient, thus weighing the lifetime risk for malignancy against the adverse event rate of potentially curative surgery in the light of number and location of cystic lesions, age of the patient, comorbidities, and the resulting life expectancy as well as the effect of repeated follow-up examinations on the patient's quality of life. This article summarizes recommendations from available guidelines and proposes a pragmatic approach to the clinical management of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Different Types, Different Management, New Guidelines

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) include different types of cysts with various biological behavior. The most prevalent PCN are intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), and serous cystic neoplasm (SCN). Management of PCN should focus on the prevention of malignant progression, while avoiding unnecessary morbidity of surgery. This requires specialized centers with dedicated multidisciplinary PCN teams. The malignant potential of PCN varies enormously between the various types of PCN. A combination of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration is typically needed before a reliable diagnosis can be made. Several guidelines discuss the management of PCN; however, most of these are non-evidence-based without clear consensus on the optimal treatment and follow-up strategy. The 2018 European guidelines on PCN are the first evidence-based guidelines to include IPMN, MCN, SCN, and all other PCN. This guideline advises a more conservative approach to side-branch IPMN and MCN smaller than 40 mm and more often a surgical approach in IPMN with a main duct dilatation beyond 5 mm. The goal of this review is to summarize the different types and management of the most common PCN based on the current literature and guidelines.