Validation of at least 1 mm as cut-off for resection margins for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail

Long-term outcomes of prophylactic right-half dissection of the superior mesenteric artery nerve plexus in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: five-year results from a randomized phase II trial

PURPOSES

In pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Prophylactic right-half dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) nerve plexus has been attempted in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In this study, we evaluated the significance of prophylactic right-half dissection of the SMA nerve plexus by extending the observation period to 5 years.

METHODS

From April 2014 to June 2018, 74 patients with PDAC in the pancreatic head were randomly assigned to either the dissection group, in which the right half of the nerve plexus of the SMA was dissected (n = 37) or the preservation group, in which the nerve plexus of the SMA was completely preserved (n = 37). The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of diarrhea were prospectively compared between groups.

RESULTS

The median RFS (20 vs. 16 months, P = 0.503) and OS (37.0 vs. 30.0 months, P = 0.582) did not differ significantly between the dissection and preservation groups. There was no significant difference in locoregional recurrence (27.0% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.320) or distant metastasis (64.9% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.451). Postoperative diarrhea occurred in 64.9% and 62.2% of the cases in the dissection and preservation groups, respectively (P = 0.809).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic right half dissection of the SMA nerve plexus did not improve the RFS or OS.

Development and Validation of the Predictive and Prognostic ChemoResist Signature in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Multicohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a signature to precisely predict prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND

PDAC is largely heterogeneous and responds discrepantly to treatment.

METHODS

A total of 551 consecutive patients with PDAC from 3 different cohorts of tertiary centers were initially enrolled. Genetic events of the 4 most commonly mutated genes in PDAC and expressions of 12 PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway markers were examined. A 9-feature signature for the prediction of chemotherapy benefits was constructed in the training cohort using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model and validated in 2 independent cohorts.

RESULTS

Utilizing the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model, a predictive and prognostic signature, named ChemoResist, was established based on KRAS single nucleotide variant (SNV), phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), and mTOR expressions, and 6 clinicopathologic features. Significant differences in survival were observed between high and low-ChemoResist patients receiving chemotherapy in both the training [median overall survival (OS), 17 vs 42 months, P < 0.001; median disease-free survival (DFS), 10 vs 23 months, P < 0.001] and validation cohorts (median OS, 18 vs 35 months, P = 0.034; median DFS, 11 vs 20 months, P = 0.028). The ChemoResist classifier also significantly differentiated patient survival in whole patients regardless of chemotherapy. Multivariable-adjusted analysis substantiated the ChemoResist signature as an independent predictive and prognostic factor. For predicting 2-year OS, the ChemoResist classifier had significantly higher areas under the curve than TNM stage (0.788 vs 0.636, P < 0.001), other clinicopathologic characteristics (0.505-0.668), and single molecular markers (0.507-0.591) in the training cohort. Furthermore, patients with low ChemoResist scores exhibited a more favorable response to adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those with high ChemoResist scores (hazard ratio for OS: training, 0.22 vs 0.57; validation, 0.26 vs 0.50; hazard ratio for DFS: training, 0.35 vs 0.54; validation, 0.18 vs 0.59). The ChemoResist signature was further validated in the total cohort undergoing R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The ChemoResist signature could precisely predict survival in PDAC undergoing resection and chemotherapy, and its predictive value surpassed the TNM stage and other clinicopathologic factors. Moreover, the ChemoResist classifier could assist with identifying patients who would more likely benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Treatment with Changes in Chemotherapy Regimens According to Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level for Resectable/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The response of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may contribute to outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changes in NAT regimens based on CA19-9 level.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with resectable/borderline resectable (R/BR)-PDAC undergoing NAT from 2008 to 2022. A CA19-9 level lower than 150 IU/mL after NAT was the criterion for resection. If the level did not decrease, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to satisfy the criterion. The patient cohort was divided into group A (satisfied criterion without changing chemotherapy), group B (did not receive chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion), group C (received chemotherapy change, satisfied the criterion), and group D (received chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 283 patients. After first-line chemotherapy, 112 (39.6%) patients did not satisfy the criterion (groups B [n = 64], C [n = 32], and D [n = 16]). Of the 283 patients, 48 (17%) received a chemotherapy change (groups C and D). The patients in groups C and D showed significantly better overall survival (OS, 35.9 months) than the group B patients (25.7 months) (P = 0.035). The OS of the group C patients (63.8 months) was similar to the OS of the group A patients (n = 171: 56.3 months; P = 0.430). Multivariate analysis of the patients in groups B, C, and D identified chemotherapy change as an independent prognostic factor for OS and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Changing the chemotherapy targeting the CA19-9 level can improve the outcome of R/BR-PDAC patients with poor biologic response to first-line NAT.

Intraoperative liquid biopsy as a tool for detecting R1 resection during pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: the CETUPANC trial (part II)

INTRODUCTION

A positive surgical margin (R1 resection) is a relevant risk factor for local recurrence in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC). An intraoperative liquid biopsy (ILB) based on tumor cell mobilization could help to detect R1 resection intraoperatively.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential role of the intraoperative circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cluster mobilization on the R0/R1 detection.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with resectable PDAC of the head of the pancreas were prospective enrolled under the CETUPANC trial. Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was done in all patients. Intraoperative CTCs and clusters were determined during PD.

RESULTS

The overall rate of R1 resection was 34.9% (22/63 patients). Multivariate analysis showed that factors associated with R1 resection (AUC=0.920) were the presence of undifferentiated G3 tumor (P=0.017), microscopic vascular invasion (P=0.016), and the intraoperative increase of both free CTCs and clusters in portal vein determination from the beginning to the end of the surgery (P=0.002 and P=0.005, respectively). A specific logistic regression model, including delta end to baseline CTCs and cluster mobilization to achieve a combined cut-off to detect R1 detection was calculated (AUC=0.799). The obtained R1-index based on ILB had 84% of sensitivity and 68% of specificity to detect R1 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The ILB based on the intraoperative mobilization of CTCs and clusters from the beginning to the end of the PD was a predictive factor to detect R1 resection in patients with PDAC.

Intra-Operative Tumour Detection and Staging in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: An Integrative Review of Current Standards and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) entails the excision of the primary tumour and regional lymphadenectomy. This traditional strategy is challenged by the high rate of early recurrence, suggesting inadequate disease staging. Novel methods of intra-operative staging are needed to allow surgical resection to be tailored to the disease's biology.

METHODS

A search of published articles on the PubMed and Embase databases was performed using the terms 'pancreas' OR 'pancreatic' AND 'intra-operative staging/detection' OR 'guided surgery'. Articles published between January 2000 and June 2023 were included. Technologies that offered intra-operative staging and tailored treatment were curated and summarised in the following integrative review.

RESULTS

lymph node (LN) mapping and radioimmunoguided surgery have shown promising results but lacked practicality to facilitate real-time intra-operative staging for PDAC. Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) offers high contrast and sensitivity, enabling the identification of cancerous tissue and positive LNs with improved precision following intravenous administration of a fluorescent agent. The unique properties of optical coherence tomography and ultrasound elastography lend themselves to be platforms for virtual biopsy intra-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate intra-operative staging of PDAC, localisation of metastatic LNs, and identification of extra-pancreatic disease remain clinically unmet needs under current detection methods and staging standards. Tumour-specific FGS combined with other diagnostic and therapeutic modalities could improve tumour detection and staging in patients with PDAC.

To Revise or Not Revise? Isolated Margin Positivity in Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The study determined the proportion of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who had margin-positive disease and no other adverse pathologic findings (APF) using institutional and administrative datasets.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I or II PDAC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB 2010-2020) and those who underwent pancreatectomy at the authors' institution (2010-2021) were identified. Isolated margin positivity (IMP) was defined as a positive surgical margin with no APF (negative nodes, no lymphovascular/perineural invasion).

RESULTS

The study included 225 patients from the authors' institution and 23,598 patients from the NCDB. The margin-positive rates were 21.8% and 20.3%, and the IMP rates were 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively. In the institutional cohort, 68.4% of the patients had recurrence, and most of the patients (65.6%) had distant recurrences. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 63.3 months for no APF, not reached for IMP, 14.8 months for negative margins & 1 APF, 20.3 months for positive margins & 2 APFs, and 12.9 months with all APF positive. The patients in the NCDB with IMP had a lower median OS than the patients with no APF (20.5 vs 390 months), but a higher median OS than those with margin positivity plus 1 APF (20.5 vs 18.0 months) or all those with APF positivity (20.5 vs 15.4 months). Based on institutional rates of IMP, any margin positivity, neck margin positivity (NMP), and no APF, the fraction of patients who might benefit from neck margin revision was 1 in 100,000, and those likely to benefit from any margin revision was 1 in 18,500. In the NCDB, those estimated to derive potential benefit from margin revision was 1 in 25,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated margin positivity in resected PDAC is rare, and most patients experience distant recurrence. Revision of IMP appears unlikely to confer benefit to most patients.

Risk of Recurrence After Surgical Resection for Adenocarcinoma Arising From Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasia (IPMN) With Patterns of Distribution and Treatment: An International, Multicenter, Observational Study (ADENO-IPMN Study)

OBJECTIVE

This international multicenter cohort study aims to identify recurrence patterns and treatment of first and second recurrence in a large cohort of patients after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN).

BACKGROUND

Recurrence patterns and treatment of recurrence postresection of adenocarcinoma arising from IPMN are poorly explored.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma from IPMN between January 2010 and December 2020 at 18 pancreatic centers were identified. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and multivariable logistic regression by Cox-Proportional Hazards modeling. End points were recurrence (time-to, location, and pattern of recurrence) and survival (overall survival and adjusted for treatment provided).

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-nine patients were included (median, 70 years; interquartile range, 64-76; male, 54%) with a median follow-up of 78.1 months. Recurrence occurred in 209 patients [45.5%; median time to recurrence, 12.8 months; early recurrence (within 1 years), 23.2%]. Eighty-three (18.1%) patients experienced a local regional recurrence, and 164 (35.7%) patients experienced a distant recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with reduction in recurrence (hazard ratio 1.09; P =0.669) One hundred twenty patients with recurrence received further treatment. The median survival with and without additional treatment was 27.0 and 14.6 months ( P <0.001), with no significant difference between treatment modalities. There was no significant difference in survival between locations of recurrence ( P =0.401).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from IPMN is frequent with a quarter of patients recurring within 12 months. Treatment of recurrence is associated with improved overall survival and should be considered.

Prognostic value of margin clearance in total and distal pancreatectomy specimens with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Danish population-based nationwide study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of resection margin status following total (TP) and distal (DP) pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is insufficiently evaluated. In Denmark, pancreatic surgery, including the postoperative pathological examination of the resection specimens, is confined to four centres, all reporting to the Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database (DPCD). In this Danish population-based nationwide study on TP and DP for PDAC from 2015-2019, based on data from DPCD, we evaluated whether there is a prognostically relevant minimum margin clearance definition and whether certain margins hold independent prognostic information.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data were retrieved from DPCD and supplemented by review of pathology reports and re-microscopy, if needed. One of the study pathologists performed all re-microscopy. The prognostic significance of margin status was evaluated by dichotomisation of the TP cohort (n = 101) and the DP cohort (n = 90) into involved and uninvolved groups, using different clearance definitions (0.5 - ≥3.0 mm).

RESULTS

Following TP, direct involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin had independent prognostic value. When using a clearance definition of ≥ 0.5 or ≥ 1.5 mm for SMA, median survival for R0 versus R1 was 19 (95% CI 14-26) versus 10 (95% CI 5-20) months (p = 0.010), and 21 (95% CI 15-30) versus 10 (95% CI 8-19) months (p = 0.011), respectively. Overall margin status was not of significant prognostic importance following neither DP nor TP.

CONCLUSION

In this Danish population-based nationwide study, SMA margin involvement was a significant isolated prognostic factor following TP, whereas combined assessment of all circumferential margins did not hold statistically significant prognostic information. Following DP, resection margin status did not affect survival.

The Revised R Status is an Independent Predictor of Postresection Survival in Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant Treatment

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the oncological outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who had an R 0 or R 1 resection based on the revised R status (1 mm) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

BACKGROUND

The revised R status is an independent prognostic factor in upfront-resected PDAC; however, the significance of 1 mm margin clearance after NAT remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreatectomy after NAT for PDAC were identified from 2 prospectively maintained databases. Clinicopathological and survival data were analyzed. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and pattern of recurrence in association with R 0 >1 mm and R 1 ≤1 mm resections.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-seven patients with PDAC were included after NAT and subsequent pancreatic resection. Two hundred eight patients (58.3%) received FOLFIRINOX, 41 patients (11.5%) received gemcitabine-based regimens, and 299 individuals (83.8%) received additional radiotherapy. R 0 resections were achieved in 272 patients (76.2%) and 85 patients (23.8%) had R 1 resections. Median OS after R 0 was 41.0 months, compared with 20.6 months after R 1 resection ( P = 0.002), and even longer after additional adjuvant chemotherapy ( R 0 44.8 vs R1 20.1 months; P = 0.0032). Median RFS in the R 0 subgroup was 17.5 months versus 9.4 months in the R 1 subgroup ( P < 0.0001). R status was confirmed as an independent predictor for OS ( R 1 hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.07-2.26) and RFS ( R 1 hazard ratio: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.14-2.0). In addition, R 1 resections were significantly associated with local but not distant recurrence ( P < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

The revised R status is an independent predictor of postresection survival and local recurrence in PDAC after NAT. Achieving R 0 resection with a margin of at least 1 mm should be a primary goal in the surgical treatment of PDAC after NAT.

Developments in pancreatic cancer surgery

Pancreatic cancer surgery, with one of the worst prognoses in oncology, is a challenge to the surgical community. Centralization of pancreatic surgery has led to the foundation of high-volume centers, thereby greatly facilitating the successful performance of more radical approaches. This review spotlights on recent advances in surgical approaches to pancreatic cancer and the risks and benefits of vascular reconstruction to improve resectability. Surgery being the only modality to achieve cure, multivisceral and vascular resections are being incorporated to improve dismal operability rates of < 10%. Great leaps have been made in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, as targeted and specific chemotherapeutic agents are being continually added. The concept of borderline and locally advanced pancreatic tumors and the use of neoadjuvant chemorad has extended the indications of oncological resection in such tumors. Venous resections are being routinely performed so as to facilitate en bloc removal of tumors, while arterial resections, owing to the increased morbidity and mortality, are offered to highly selective cases. New techniques like the triangle operation and periarterial divestment have opened new viable surgical options. Although laparoscopic approach is time consuming, it offers reduced operative blood loss and a shortened hospital stay at specialized centers. Robotic surgery may produce better results in patients needing vascular resection and reconstruction, but the expenses involved and limited availability are major deterrents. Advanced techniques of surgical resection and vessel reconstruction provide a repository for curative-intent surgery in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic impact of resection margin status on survival after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A greater than 1 mm tumour-free resection margin (R0 >1 mm) is a prognostic factor in upfront-resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. After neoadjuvant treatment (NAT); however, the prognostic impact of resection margin (R) status remains controversial.

METHODS

Randomised and non-randomised studies assessing the association of R status and survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after NAT were sought by systematic searches of MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL. Hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% CI were collected to generate log HR using the inverse-variance method. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed and the results presented as weighted HR. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were conducted to account for different surgical procedures and varying length of follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with a total of 4929 patients were included. Based on univariable data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.57-1.97; P<0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001). Using adjusted data, R0 greater than 1 mm was significantly associated with prolonged OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.39-1.97; P<0.00001) and DFS (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30-2.39; P=0.0003). Results for R1 direct were comparable in the entire cohort; however, no prognostic impact was detected in sensitivity analysis including only partial pancreatoduodenectomies.

CONCLUSION

After NAT, a tumour-free margin greater than 1 mm is independently associated with improved OS as well as DFS in patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

Predicting resection margin status of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on CT: performance of NCCN resectability criteria

OBJECTIVE

To test the performance of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) CT resectability criteria for predicting the surgical margin status of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and to identify factors associated with margin-positive resection.

METHODS

Eighty patients with pre-operative CT and upfront surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Two radiologists assessed the CT resectability (resectable [R], borderline resectable [BR], unresectable [UR]) of the PNET according to NCCN criteria. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with resection margin status. κ statistics were used to evaluate interreader agreements. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to estimate and compare recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (56.2%) received R0 resection and 35 (43.8%) received R1 or R2 resection. R0 resection rates were 63.6-64.2%, 20.0-33.3%, and 0% for R, BR, and UR diseases, respectively (all p ≤ 0.002), with a good interreader agreement (κ, 0.74). Tumor size (<2 cm, 2-4 cm, and >4 cm; odds ratio (OR), 9.042-18.110; all p ≤ 0.007) and NCCN BR/UR diseases (OR, 5.918; p = 0.032) were predictors for R1 or R2 resection. The R0 resection rate was 91.7% for R disease <2 cm and decreased for larger R disease. R0 resection and smaller tumor size in R disease improved RFS.

CONCLUSION

NCCN resectability criteria can stratify patients with PNET into distinct groups of R0 resectability. Adding tumor size to R disease substantially improves the prediction of R0 resection, especially for PNETs <2 cm.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Tumor size and radiologic resectability independently predicted margin status of PNETs.

Modified Appleby procedure for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A primer for the radiologist

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most prevalent pancreatic neoplasm accounting for more than 90% of pancreatic malignancies. Surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy remains the only available curative strategy for patients with PDAC. Despite improvements in both chemotherapy regimen and surgical care, body/neck PDAC still conveys a poor prognosis because of the vicinity of major vascular structures, including celiac trunk, which favors insidious disease spread at the time of diagnosis. Body/neck PDAC involving the celiac trunk is considered locally advanced PDAC in most guidelines and therefore not eligible for upfront resection. However, a more aggressive surgical approach (i.e., distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and en-bloc celiac trunk resection [DP-CAR]) was recently proposed to offer hope for cure in selected patients with locally advanced body/neck PDAC responsive to induction therapy at the cost of higher morbidity. The so-called "modified Appleby procedure" is highly demanding and requires optimal preoperative staging as well as appropriate patient preparation for surgery (i.e., preoperative arterial embolization). Herein, we review current evidence regarding DP-CAR indications and outcomes as well as the critical role of diagnostic and interventional radiology in patient preparation before DP-CAR, and early identification and management of DP-CAR complications.

Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022

This retrospective analysis of the prospective IGOMIPS registry reports on 1191 minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) performed in Italy between 2019 and 2022, including 668 distal pancreatectomies (DP) (55.7%), 435 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) (36.3%), 44 total pancreatectomies (3.7%), 36 tumor enucleations (3.0%), and 8 central pancreatectomies (0.7%). Spleen-preserving DP was performed in 109 patients (16.3%). Overall incidence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) was 17.6% with a 90-day mortality of 1.9%. This registry analysis provided some important information. First, robotic assistance was preferred for all MIPR but DP with splenectomy. Second, robotic assistance reduced conversion to open surgery and blood loss in comparison to laparoscopy. Robotic PD was also associated with lower incidence of severe postoperative complications and a trend toward lower mortality. Fourth, the annual cut-off of ≥ 20 MIPR and ≥ 20 MIPD improved selected outcome measures. Fifth, most MIPR were performed by a single surgeon. Sixth, only two-thirds of the centers performed spleen-preserving DP. Seventh, DP with splenectomy was associated with higher conversion rate when compared to spleen-preserving DP. Eighth, the use of pancreatojejunostomy was the prevalent reconstruction in PD. Ninth, final histology was similar for MIPR performed at high- and low-volume centers, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently at high-volume centers. Finally, this registry analysis raises important concerns about the reliability of R1 assessment underscoring the importance of standardized pathology of pancreatic specimens. In conclusion, MIPR can be safely implemented on a national scale. Further analyses are required to understand nuances of implementation of MIPR in Italy.

A neoadjuvant therapy compatible prognostic staging for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To improve prediction, the AJCC staging system was revised to be consistent with upfront surgery (UFS) and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for PDAC.

BACKGROUND

The AJCC staging system was designed for patients who have had UFS for PDAC, and it has limited predictive power for patients receiving NAT.

METHODS

We examined 146 PDAC patients who had resection after NAT and 1771 who had UFS at Changhai Hospital between 2012 and 2021. The clinicopathological factors were identified using Cox proportional regression analysis, and the Neoadjuvant Therapy Compatible Prognostic (NATCP) staging was developed based on these variables. Validation was carried out in the prospective NAT cohort and the SEER database. The staging approach was compared to the AJCC staging system regarding predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

The NAT cohort's multivariate analysis showed that tumor differentiation and the number of positive lymph nodes independently predicted OS. The NATCP staging simplified the AJCC stages, added tumor differentiation, and restaged the disease based on the Kaplan-Meier curve survival differences. The median OS for NATCP stages IA, IB, II, and III was 31.7 months, 25.0 months, and 15.8 months in the NAT cohort and 30.1 months, 22.8 months, 18.3 months, and 14.1 months in the UFS cohort. Compared to the AJCC staging method, the NATCP staging system performed better and was verified in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the use of NAT, NATCP staging demonstrated greater predictive abilities than the existing AJCC staging approach for resected PDAC and may facilitate clinical decision-making based on accurate prediction of patients' OS.

Gene signature developed for predicting early relapse and survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to construct a predictive signature integrating tumour-mutation- and copy-number-variation-associated features using machine learning to precisely predict early relapse and survival in patients with resected stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with microscopically confirmed stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing R0 resection at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between March 2015 and December 2016 were enrolled. Whole exosome sequencing was performed, and genes with different mutation or copy number variation statuses between patients with and without relapse within 1 year were identified using bioinformatics analysis. A support vector machine was used to evaluate the importance of the differential gene features and to develop a signature. Signature validation was performed in an independent cohort. The associations of the support vector machine signature and single gene features with disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed. Biological functions of integrated genes were further analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 30 and 40 patients were included in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Some 11 genes with differential patterns were first identified; using a support vector machine, four features (mutations of DNAH9, TP53, and TUBGCP6, and copy number variation of TMEM132E) were further selected and integrated to construct a predictive signature (the support vector machine classifier). In the training cohort, the 1-year disease-free survival rates were 88 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 73 to 100) and 7 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 47) in the low-support vector machine subgroup and the high-support vector machine subgroup respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses showed that high support vector machine was significantly and independently associated with both worse overall survival (HR 29.20 (95 per cent c.i. 4.48 to 190.21); P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR 72.04 (95 per cent c.i. 6.74 to 769.96); P < 0.001). The area under the curve of the support vector machine signature for 1-year disease-free survival (0.900) was significantly larger than the area under the curve values of the mutations of DNAH9 (0.733; P = 0.039), TP53 (0.767; P = 0.024), and TUBGCP6 (0.733; P = 0.023), the copy number variation of TMEM132E (0.700; P = 0.014), TNM stage (0.567; P = 0.002), and differentiation grade (0.633; P = 0.005), suggesting higher predictive accuracy for prognosis. The value of the signature was further validated in the validation cohort. The four genes included in the support vector machine signature (DNAH9, TUBGCP6, and TMEM132E were novel in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) were significantly associated with the tumour immune microenvironment, G protein-coupled receptor binding and signalling, cell-cell adhesion, etc.

CONCLUSION

The newly constructed support vector machine signature precisely and powerfully predicted relapse and survival in patients with stage I-II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after R0 resection.

Oncological Outcome of Conversion Surgery After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome of conversion surgery in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) and to identify patients who may benefit from this approach.

BACKGROUND

The role of conversion surgery in patients with mPDAC and exceptional response to chemotherapy remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical exploration for mPDAC following chemotherapy between 2006 and 2019 were included. Data on demographics, oncologic treatment, pathology, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Some 173 patients received preoperative chemotherapy and underwent surgical exploration. Ninety-three patients underwent resection of the primary tumor and metastatic sites, 80 patients underwent exploration only. In the resection subgroup, 45 patients had complete pathological response of metastases (ypM0) and 48 patients had residual metastases (ypM1). ypM0 status was associated with lower carcinoembryonic antigen levels and lower ypN stage. Overall survival after resection was 25.5 months in ypM0, 10.7 months in ypM1, and 8.1 months in patients without resection ( P <0.001). Additional adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with prolonged survival in resected patients (29.0 vs 14.8 mo, P =0.024) as well as in ypM0 (29.1 vs 19.2 mo, P =0.047). Multivariable analysis identified conversion surgery, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and time of resection as independent prognostic markers for the entire cohort. CA19-9, ypM0 and adjuvant treatment were independent predictors of survival in the resection subgroup.

CONCLUSION

In patients with mPDAC and ypM0 status after chemotherapy, surgical resection is associated with encouraging survival. mPDAC patients with exceptional response to chemotherapy may be candidates for exploration and for resection in ypM0. Adjuvant chemotherapy may provide an additional survival advantage.

Extended distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer: is it justified? A systematic review of literature

Background: Extended distal pancreatectomy (EDP) is being increasingly performed for pancreatic cancers with suspected invasion into the adjacent organs. However, the perioperative safety and oncological efficacy of this procedure merit further elucidation. Methods: Major databases were searched for studies evaluating EDP, and a meta-analysis was performed using fixed- or random-effects models. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the analysis. EDP was found to be associated with significantly greater incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula overall and with major complications, re-explorations, mortality and readmissions. However, on pooled analysis of 3- and 5-year survival, EDP was found to be noninferior to standard distal pancreatectomy. Conclusion: EDP is feasible and may offer equivalent survival in highly selected patients but carries a higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Presence of low-grade IPMN at the pancreatic transection margin does not have prognostic significance after resection of IPMN-associated pancreatic adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Resection margin status is a well-established prognosticator in pancreatic cancer. The prognostic impact of IPMN dysplasia at the pancreatic transection margin in IPMN-associated carcinoma (IPMN-Ca) remains unclear, hence institutional practices on additional resections vary.

METHODS

Patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy or attempted partial pancreatectomy converted to total pancreatectomy for IPMN-Ca between 04/2002 and 12/2018 were identified. Final pathology of the definitive pancreatic transection margin was identified. The association between the presence of IPMN dysplasia at the margin and overall survival (OS) was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 302 patients with IPMN-Ca, 181 (59.9%) patients received partial pancreatoduodenectomy, 61 (20.2%) distal pancreatectomy, and 60 (19.9%) were converted to total pancreatectomy. Median OS was 98.6 months in R0 (≥1 mm), 39.3 months in R1 (<1 mm), and 22.0 months in R1(direct) resected patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). No IPMN dysplasia at the definitive margin was present in 103 (34.1%), low-grade in 131 (43.4%), and high-grade/R1 in 8 (2.6%) patients. Low-grade dysplasia or total pancreatectomy were not associated with shorter OS compared to dysplasia-free margin across the entire cohort. Sensitivity analyses confirmed a lack of prognostic relevance of low-grade IPMN dysplasia at the pancreatic margin in R0 resected IPMN-Ca and in R0 resected UICC stage IA/IB IPMN-Ca.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade IPMN at the transection margin is not associated with shorter overall survival after partial pancreatectomy for IPMN-Ca. Additional resections for low-grade dysplasia, up to total pancreatectomy do not result in a survival benefit and should be omitted. Due to limited sample size, high-grade dysplasia could not be analyzed.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer with cavernous transformation of the portal vein: a case report

Background

Cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) due to extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is a rare vascular anomaly. Since its symptoms usually appear in childhood, most of the adult cases are detected unexpectedly with other diseases. Only a few reports have described surgical difficulties in patients with CTPV. We report a case of pancreatic head cancer with CTPV in a patient who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old man with epigastric and back pain was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography revealed a tumor in the pancreatic head and a CTPV near the hepatic hilum. CTPV consisted of two main collateral vessels connected by multiple surrounding small vessels. Also, portal vein obstruction was observed near the hepatic hilum, which was far from the pancreatic head tumor. After confirming that there was no distant metastasis by a thorough whole-body search, we performed a pancreaticoduodenectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. During the operation, we carefully manipulated the area of the CTPV and omitted lymph node dissection in the hepatoduodenal ligament to prevent massive venous bleeding and intestinal congestion. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed without any intraoperative complications and the postoperative course was uneventful. Complete tumor resection was histologically confirmed.

Conclusion

Although pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with CTPV involves many surgical difficulties, we successfully performed it by determining specific treatment strategies tailored to the patient and following careful and delicate surgical procedures.

A Pretreatment Prognostic Score to Stratify Survival in Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a pretreatment prognostic score in pancreatic cancer (PDAC).

BACKGROUND

Pretreatment prognostication in PDAC is important for treatment decisions but remains challenging. Available prognostic tools are derived from selected cohorts of patients who underwent resection, excluding up to 20% of patients with exploration only, and do not adequately reflect the pretreatment scenario.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for PDAC in Heidelberg from July 2006 to June 2014 were identified from a prospective database. Pretreatment parameters were extracted from the database and the laboratory information system. Parameters independently associated with overall survival by uni- and multivariable analyses were used to build a prognostic score. A contemporary cohort from Verona was used for external validation.

RESULTS

In 1197 patients, multiple pretreatment parameters were associated with overall survival by univariable analyses. American Society of Anesthesiology classification, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen, C-reactive protein, albumin, and platelet count were independently associated with survival and were used to create the Heidelberg Prognostic Pancreatic Cancer (HELPP)-score. The HELPP-score was closely associated with overall survival (median survival between 31.3 and 4.8 months; 5-year survival rates between 35% and 0%) and was able to stratify survival in subgroups with or without resection as well as in CA19-9 nonsecretors. In the resected subgroup the HELPP-score stratified survival independently of pathological prognostic factors. The HELPP-score was externally validated and was superior to CA19-9 in both the development and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The HELPP-score is a readily available prognostic tool based on pretreatment routine parameters to stratify survival in PDAC independently of resection status and pathological tumor stage.

Thermal ablation in pancreatic cancer: A scoping review of clinical studies

Background

Pancreatic cancer is a deadly cancer with a 5-year survival rate less than 10%. Only 20% of patients are eligible to receive surgery at diagnosis. Hence, new therapies are needed to improve outcomes for non-surgical candidates. Thermal ablation techniques can offer a non-invasive alternative to surgery.

Aim

The aim of this review is to map the literature for the use of thermal ablative techniques: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), Microwave ablation (MWA), and Laser ablation (LA) in the management of patients with PC.

Methods

A search strategy was applied to PUBMED and EMBASE using keywords concerning pancreatic cancer, radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound ablation, laser ablation, and microwave ablation. The studies that fit this inclusion criteria were summarized in table format and results reviewed for interpretation.

Results

72 clinical studies were included. Most of the included studies related to RFA (n=35) and HIFU (n=27). The most common study design was retrospective (n=33). Only 3 randomized control trials (RCT) were included, all of which related to RFA. Safety outcomes were reported in 53 of the 72 studies, and survival outcomes were reported in 39. Statistically significant survival benefits were demonstrated in 11 studies.

Conclusion

The evidence for the benefit of MWA and LA in PC patients is limited. RFA and HIFU are safe and feasible therapies to be used in PC patients. Further RCTs where thermal techniques are standardized and reported are necessary in the future to elucidate thermal ablation's clinical utility, and before an evidence-based decision on its routine use in PC management can be considered.

Risk factors of positive resection margin differ in pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing upfront surgery

OBJECTIVE

Positive resection margin indicates worse prognosis. The present study identified the independent risk factors of R1 resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatosplenectomy (DP) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHOD

Consecutive patients who were operated from 1st December 2017 to 30th December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. A standardized pathological examination with digital whole-mount slide images (DWMSIs) was utilized for evaluation of resection margin status. R1 was defined as microscopic tumor infiltration within 1 mm to the resection margin. The potential risk factors of R1 resection for PD and DP were analyzed separately by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

For the 192 patients who underwent PD, and the 87 patients who underwent DP, the R1 resection rates were 31.8% and 35.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis on risk factors of R1 resection for PD were tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, N staging, and TNM staging; while those for DP were T staging and TNM staging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the location of tumor in the neck and uncinate process, and N1/2 staging were independent risk factors of R1 resection for PD; while those for DP were T3 staging.

CONCLUSIONS

The clarification of the risk factors of R1 resection might clearly make surgeons take reasonable decisions on surgical strategies for different surgical procedures in patients with PDAC, so as to obtain the first attempt of R0 resection.

Systematic review, meta-analysis and single-centre experience of the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green-fluorescence in detecting pancreatic tumours

BACKGROUND

During pancreatic resections assessing tumour boundaries and identifying the ideal resection margins can be challenging due to the associated pancreatic gland inflammation and texture. This is particularly true in the context of minimally invasive surgery, where there is a very limited or absent tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging can assist surgeons by simply providing valuable real-time intraoperative information at low cost with minimal side effects. This meta-analysis summarises the available evidence on the use of near-infrared fluorescence imaging with ICG for the intraoperative visualization of pancreatic tumours (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021247203).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Web Of Science electronic databases were searched to identify manuscripts where ICG was intravenously administered prior to or during pancreatic surgery and reporting the prevalence of pancreatic lesions visualised through fluorescence imaging.

RESULTS

Six studies with 7 series' reporting data on 64 pancreatic lesions were included in the analysis. MINOR scores ranged from 6 to 10, with a median of 8. The most frequent indications were pancreatic adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumours. In most cases (67.2%) ICG was administered during surgery. ICG fluorescence identified 48/64 lesions (75%) with 81.3% accuracy, 0.788 (95%CI 0.361-0.961) sensitivity, 1 (95%CI 0.072-1) specificity and positive predictive value of 0.982 (95%CI 0.532-1). In line with the literature, ICG fluorescence identified 5/6 (83.3%) of pancreatic lesions during robotic pancreatic resections performed at our Institution.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis is the first summarising the results of ICG immunofluorescence in detecting pancreatic tumours during surgery, showing good accuracy. Additional research is needed to define optimal ICG administration strategies and fluorescence intensity cut-offs.

Impact of resection margin status on survival after operation for pancreatic head cancer with extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion

BACKGROUND

Extrapancreatic nerve plexus (PL) invasion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an important factor for determining resectability and surgical method. We sought to clarify the characteristics of PDAC with PL invasion and clinical impact of the resection margin status on prognosis for PDAC with PL invasion.

METHODS

A total of 242 patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent pancreatectomy were evaluated. Clinicopathological data and patient survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Pathological PL invasion was observed in 68 patients (28.1%). Patients with PL invasion had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and showed trends toward worse overall survival (OS) than those without PL invasion. While multivariate analysis revealed that PL invasion was not an independent prognostic factor, PL invasion was associated with extensive venous invasion and a high percentage of lymph node metastases, both of which were independent factors affecting DFS and OS. Among patients with PL invasion, there was no significant difference in DFS and OS between the R0 and R1 resection groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PL invasion is a common pathological feature of aggressive PDAC with high propensity for invasiveness and metastatic potential. The microscopic resection margin status may not affect the survival of pancreatic head cancer patients with PL invasion.

Nationwide trends and outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer - an analysis of the Swedish national pancreatic cancer registry

OBJECTIVES

During the last decade, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic cancer has become more frequent. Pathological response and overall survival are promising; however, various post-operative complications have been reported. Our primary aim was to compare the complication scenario of patients receiving NAT in borderline resectable and locally advanced disease with those who had upfront pancreatic surgery (UFS) for primarily resectable cancer.

METHODS

From the Swedish National Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer Registry, patients resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) between 2010 and 2018 were identified. Data on patient characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, post-operative complications and survival were obtained. Comparisons between groups as well as survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Within the total cohort of 13,948 patients, 1894 (median age 69 years, 51% men) were resected for PDAC. Among these, 112 (5.9%) patients received NAT followed by surgery. The patients who received NAT were younger (67 vs 70 years, p < .001), had a lower level of CA19-9 (47 vs 108, p = .001) and had to a larger extent vascular resection (58.9 vs 26.9%, p < .001) and total pancreatectomy performed (23.2 vs 9.1%, p < .001). No difference was found for major post-operative complications and there was no significant change in survival rate between the NAT and UFS groups (median 28 vs 26 months, p = .122).

CONCLUSIONS

When analyzing data from a national registry, no difference in post-operative complications was found between resected patients receiving UFS and NAT for PDAC. Also, the survival was equal between groups. NAT is a feasible treatment option for patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status on Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. While surgical resection is the only treatment option with curative intent, most patients die of locoregional and/or distant recurrence. The prognostic impact of the resection margin status has received much attention. However, the evidence is almost exclusively related to pancreatoduodenectomies, while corresponding data for distal pancreatectomy specimens are limited. The key data, such as the rate of microscopic margin involvement (“R1”), the site of margin involvement, and the impact of R1 on patient outcome, are divergent between studies and do not currently allow any general conclusions. The main reasons for the variability in the published data are the small size of the study cohorts and their heterogeneity, as well as the marked divergence in pathology examination practices. The latter is a consequence of the lack of concrete guidance, both for grossing and microscopic examination. The increasing administration of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy introduces a further factor of uncertainty as the conventional definition of a tumour-free margin (“R0”) based on 1 mm clearance is inadequate for these specimens. This review discusses the published data regarding the prognostic impact of margin status in distal pancreatectomy specimens along with the challenges and uncertainties that are related to the assessment of the margins.

Prognostic Significance of Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage Cytology in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of PLC status in PDAC patients.

METHODS

Patients intending to undergo resection for PDAC between 2007 and 2020 were included. Survival was compared among patients who underwent resection with negative or positive PLC status and those who did not undergo resection. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate the prognostic impact of positive PLC status. A systematic literature review was performed to evaluate the correlation between prognosis and the positive PLC rate.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patients formed the study cohort and were divided as follows: 438 in the negative PLC group, 18 in the positive PLC group, and 24 in the no resection group. Although the median survival time significantly differed between the negative and positive PLC groups (35.7 vs. 13.6 months, P < 0.001), it did not significantly differ between the positive PLC and no resection groups (13.6 vs. 12.2 months, P = 0.605). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that positive PLC status (hazard ratio = 3.54, 95% confidence interval = 1.97-6.38, P < 0.001) was the strongest poor prognostic factor. Based on statistical analyses for the systematic review, the prognostic impact of positive PLC status weakened significantly as the institutional positive PLC rate increased (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection did not improve the prognosis of patients with positive PLC status in our cohort. The institutional positive PLC rate may be a good reference for surgical indication in these patients.

Intraoperative Positive Pancreatic Parenchymal Resection Margin: Is It a True Indication of Completion Total Pancreatectomy after Partial Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma?

Background: Total pancreatectomy (TP) can be performed in cases with positive resection margin after partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. However, despite complete removal of the residual pancreatic parenchyme, it is questionable whether an actual R0 resection and favorable survival can be achieved. This study aimed to identify the R0 resection rate and postoperative outcomes, including survival, following completion TP (cTP) performed due to intraoperative positive margin. Methods: From 1995 to 2015, 1096 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent elective pancreatectomy at the Samsung Medical Center. Among these, 25 patients underwent cTP, which was converted during partial pancreatectomy because of a positive resection margin. To compare survival after R0 resection between the cTP R0 and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) R0 cases, propensity score matching was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics. Results: The R0 rate of cTP performed due to intraoperative positive margin was 84% (21/25). The overall 5-year survival rate (5YSR) in the 25 cTP cases was 8%. There was no difference in the 5YSR between the cTP R0 and cTP R1 groups (9.5% versus 0.0%, p = 0.963). However, the 5YSR of the cTP R0 group was significantly lower than that of the PD R0 group (9.5% versus 20.0%, p = 0.022). There was no distinct difference in postoperative complications between the cTP R0 versus cTP R1 and cTP R0 versus PD R0 groups. Conclusions: In cases with intraoperative positive pancreatic parenchymal resection margin, survival after cTP was not favorable. Careful patient selection is needed to perform cTP in such cases.

IPMN-associated pancreatic cancer: Survival, prognostic staging and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-associated carcinoma is a subtype of pancreatic cancer for which prognostic factors, the validity of the AJCC/UICC staging system and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy remain unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological, treatment and follow-up data of patients with IPMN-associated carcinoma undergoing resection between 2002 and 2018 were analyzed. Uni- and multivariable survival analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of 424 patients undergoing resection for IPMN-associated carcinoma, 77% patients had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (IPMN-PDAC) and 23% had colloid carcinoma (IPMN-CC). Compared to IPMN-CC, IPMN-PDAC was diagnosed at more advanced tumor stages, more frequently involved lymph nodes, more frequently showed poor differentiation and were associated with higher rates of R1 resections. Resected IPMN-PDAC showed markedly shorter median overall survival than IPMN-CC (26.7 months vs. 91.3 months). The current AJCC/UICC staging system was validated for IPMN-associated carcinoma and for both of its subtypes. In multivariable analysis age ≥70 years, diabetes mellitus, high levels of Ca 19-9, IPMN-PDAC subtype, G3 tumors and higher AJCC/UICC stage were independently associated with shorter survival. Adjuvant therapy was not associated with improved survival in IPMN-associated carcinoma. Overall survival was comparable in patients receiving vs. not receiving adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after resection of IPMN-associated carcinoma depends on tumor stage, on histologic tumor subtype, grading, and Ca 19-9 levels. The current 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system is applicable for IPMN-associated carcinoma and for both of its subtypes IPMN-PDAC and IPMN-CC. The role of adjuvant therapy for IPMN-associated carcinoma remains unclear.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Laser Ablation Using a Diffusing Applicator for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal cancers; caused by family history, obesity, diabetes, and smoking, it has a 2–9% five-year survival rate. However, patients diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) already have an advanced stage of PC, indicating the difficulty of surgical resection. Recently, laser ablative treatment with a diffusing applicator has been proven to be feasible for treating advanced PC. Despite the potential application for treating PC, further evaluation of acute and chronic tissue responses are essential to determine the efficacy and safety of diffusing applicator under EUS guidance. In this study, EUS-guided diffusing applicator-assisted laser ablation was evaluated to quantify the extent of the tissue response after the delivery of various energy levels.

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cylindrical interstitial laser ablation (CILA) procedures can be used to treat unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). The aim of this study was to investigate the acute responses of pancreatic tissue after EUS-guided CILA in vivo in porcine models. Eight pigs were tested to compare the effects of different energy levels on pancreatic tissue ablation. A 1064 nm laser system was used to deliver 5 W through a diffusing applicator. The EUS-guided CILA was performed under four different energies: 200, 400, 600, and 800 J. Three days after the experiments, histological analysis was performed. The CILA consistently generated circular coagulated necrosis (CN) in the cross-sectioned pancreatic tissue. The ablation diameter was linearly dependent on the total energy delivery. The area of the CN initially increased with total energy delivery but became saturated at 600 J. The width of the degenerative parenchyma (DP) in the native tissue beyond the CN region increased with the total energy up to 600 J, and then decreased afterward. EUS-guided CILA can be a feasible approach for treating PC. Further animal studies will investigate the chronic responses of the pancreatic tissue to examine the efficacy and safety of the proposed method for clinical translation.

Actual Five-year Survival After Upfront Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Who Beats the Odds?

OBJECTIVE

To determine actual five-year survival (5YS) rates associated with a strategy of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

BACKGROUND

The rate of actual 5YS in PDAC remains controversial. Available data is restricted to cohorts acquired over several decades and series of resection after patient selection by neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing upfront resection for resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC from 10/2001 to 12/2011 were identified from a prospective database. Actual overall survival was assessed after a follow-up of at least 5 years. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Median survival of 937 patients was 22.1 months. The actual 5YS rate was 17.0% (n = 159) including 89 (9.5%) patients without evidence of disease >5 years after resection. 5YS rates in patients with or without adjuvanttherapy were 18.8% vs. 12.2%, respectively. Tumorgrading, number of positive lymph nodes, a context of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, and vascular resections were independently associated with 5YS. Patient-related parameters and CA 19-9 levels were associated with observed survival up to 3 years, but lost relevance thereafter. The extent of lymph node involvement was the strongest predictor of 5YS. Patients with pN0R0 had a 5YS rate of 38.2%. in patients with exclusively favorable factors the observed 5YS rate was above 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of long-term survivors with histologically confirmed PDAC. With upfront resection and adjuvant therapy an actual overall 5YS rate of 18.8% can be expected. in favorable subgroups actual 5YS is above 50%.

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of resectable acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas-propensity score matching analysis with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is recommended for patients with resectable acinar cell carcinoma (ACC). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of resectable ACC in comparison to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who consecutively underwent radical resection with pathologically confirmed ACC and PDAC from December 2011 to December 2018. Clinicopathologic characteristics and follow-up information were analyzed. A 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to minimize the bias between ACC and PDAC.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients with ACC and 1351 with PDAC were included. Compared to PDAC, ACC tended to be larger (4.5 vs. 3.0 cm; p < 0.001) and more frequently located in the pancreatic body/tail (61.5% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.009), with lower total bilirubin levels, lower neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels and lower carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. There was no difference in postoperative morbidities in patients with ACC and PDAC. The median OS and RFS were longer in ACC when compared to PDAC (OS: 43.5 mo vs. 19.0 mo, p = 0.004; RFS: 24.5 mo vs. 11.6 mo, p = 0.023). After the 1:3 PSM, ACC remained to be a better histological type for OS (p = 0.024), but had comparable RFS with PDAC (p = 0.164).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ACC after radical resection had better OS than that with PDAC. However, ACC is also an aggressive tumor with a similar trend of RFS with PDAC after the matching, necessitating the multidisciplinary treatment for resectable ACC disease.

[Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer-What is new?]

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is continuously increasing and will become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Europe and the USA by 2030. With a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 10% the prognosis remains poor. So far surgical tumor resection remains the only curative treatment option, which is now partially supported by multimodal neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy concepts. Due to the aggressive tumor biology patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in particular can profit from these multimodal therapy concepts. Additionally, in recent years surgical treatment was optimized, the criteria for tumor resectablity were defined and minimally invasive surgery was widely introduced. This review article summarizes the newest developments and the new German S3 guidelines concerning surgery of pancreatic cancer.

Prognostic relevance of the revised R status definition in pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of margin status is reported with conflicting results after pancreatic cancer resection. While some studies validated an uninvolved resection margin (R0) 1 mm or more of tumour clearance, others have failed to show benefit. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of margin definitions on median overall survival (OS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting associations between resection margins and OS between 2010 and 2021. Data regarding margin status (R0 circumferential resection margin (CRM) negative (CRM-), R0 CRM positive (CRM+), R0 direct, and R1 and OS were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled with a random-effects model. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

The full texts of 774 studies were screened. In total, 21 studies compromising 6056 patients were included in the final synthesis. In total, 188 (24 per cent) studies were excluded due to missing margin definitions. The R0 (CRM+) rate was 50 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.40 to 0.61) and the R0 (CRM-) rate was 38 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 0.29 to 0.47). R0 (CRM-) resection was independently associated with improved OS compared to combined R1 and R0 (CRM+; HR 1.36, 95 per cent c.i. 1.23 to 1.56).

CONCLUSION

The revised R status was confirmed as an independent prognosticator compared to combined R0 (CRM+) and R1. The limited number of studies, non-standardized pathology protocols, and the varying number of margins assessed hamper comparability.

Epidemiological Factors Associated With Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Dual Center Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to identify epidemiological factors associated with the development of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas comparing patients after IPMN resection with population-based controls.

METHODS

Preoperative data of 811 patients undergoing pancreatic resection for IPMN were matched in a 1:1 ratio with a random sample of volunteers from the Study of Health in Pomerania, which showed no pancreatic cyst greater than 2 mm in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography.

RESULTS

A total of 811 controls with a mean age of 61.9 years (standard deviation, 8.4 years) were matched to cases with a mean age of 66.1 years (standard deviation, 9.3 years). A previous history of pancreatitis, endocrine pancreatic insufficiency was significantly more frequent in IPMN patients compared with controls (P = 0.001). Moreover, adjusted data revealed that urogenital cancer (P = 0.034), colorectal cancer (P = 0.021), as well as first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (P = 0.001) were significantly more frequent in IPMN patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A history of urogenital and colorectal cancer often coincides with IPMN, which have an indication for surgery and are associated with preoperative episodes of pancreatitis and with endocrine insufficiency. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of these factors in IPMN development.

A Combination of Biochemical and Pathological Parameters Improves Prediction of Postresection Survival After Preoperative Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: The PANAMA-score

OBJECTIVE

To build a prognostic score for patients with primary chemotherapy undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer based on pathological parameters and preoperative Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels.

BACKGROUND

Prognostic stratification after primary chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is challenging and prediction models, such as the AJCC staging system, lack validation in the setting of preoperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with primary chemotherapy resected at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. Tumor characteristics independently associated with overall survival were identified and weighted by Cox-proportional regression. The pancreatic neoadjuvant Massachusetts-score (PANAMA-score) was computed from these variables and its performance assessed by Harrel concordance index and area under the receiving characteristics curves analysis. Comparisons were made with the AJCC staging system and external validation was performed in an independent cohort with primary chemotherapy from Heidelberg, Germany.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients constituted the training cohort. The multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size, number of positive lymph-nodes, R-status, and high CA19-9 to be independently associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis according to low, intermediate, and high PANAMA-score showed good discriminatory power of the new metrics (P < 0.001). The median overall survival for the three risk-groups was 45, 27, and 12 months, respectively. External validation in 258 patients confirmed the prognostic ability of the score and demonstrated better accuracy compared with the AJCC staging system.

CONCLUSION

The proposed PANAMA-score, based on independent predictors of postresection survival, including pathologic variables and CA19-9, not only provides better discrimination compared to the AJCC staging system, but also identifies patients at high-risk for early death.

Arterial Divestment and Resection in Post-neoadjuvant Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Introduction

The advent of neoadjuvant therapy in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has significantly improved the prognosis of the disease. Nevertheless, the only chance of long-term disease-free survival in pancreatic cancer is achieved with complete tumor resection, and artery involvement by the tumor is one of the major determinants in its resectability. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of a novel technique, namely, the periarterial divestment, which has allowed surgeons to clear the tumor tissues off the visceral arteries without the need for arterial reconstruction.

Materials and methods

In this single-center, retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study done between August 2019 and July 2021, seven consecutive patients with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent neoadjuvant therapy were included. Arterial divestment was performed in six of seven patients and arterial reconstruction was performed in one of the patients. The data on perioperative and the early oncological outcome were recorded.

Results

Five patients underwent periarterial divestment, one underwent sub-adventitial divestment, and one underwent superior mesenteric artery reconstruction due to deeper tumor infiltration into the arterial wall. The intraoperative frozen section of periarterial tissue was positive in three cases and the final histopathological specimen after the divestment showed a positive margin in two of the cases. The clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula was noted in two patients, and one patient experienced grade C post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage due to a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm. Four patients, all of whom underwent periarterial divestment, experienced postoperative diarrhea. There were no mortality and the median postoperative hospital stay was seven days.

Conclusion

The need for arterial reconstruction in borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer can be avoided by using the periarterial divestment technique. Divestment of arteries is technically feasible and can be carried out safely without compromising the patient's oncological outcome. However, further validation of this technique must be done by well-designed studies with a greater sample size.

Surgery for pancreatic cancer: current controversies and challenges

Two areas that remain the focus of improvement in pancreatic cancer include high post-operative morbidity and inability to uniformly translate surgical success into long-term survival. This narrative review addresses specific aspects of pancreatic cancer surgery, including neoadjuvant therapy, vascular resections, extended pancreatectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy and current status of minimally invasive surgery. R0 resection confers longer disease-free survival and overall survival. Vascular and adjacent organ resections should be undertaken after neoadjuvant therapy, only if R0 resection can be ensured based on high-quality preoperative imaging, and that too, with acceptable post-operative morbidity. Extended lymphadenectomy does not offer any advantage over standard lymphadenectomy. Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies offers some short-term benefits over open distal pancreatectomy, safety remains a concern with minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. Strict adherence to principles and judicious utilization of surgery within a multimodality framework is the way forward.

Successful En Bloc Resection of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Tail Cancer with Colonic Perforation Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Distal pancreatic cancers may be unresectable at the time of diagnosis because these cancers are asymptomatic and readily infiltrate neighboring organs. Radical resection of a pancreatic tail cancer with colonic perforation is rare. We describe successful resection of a locally advanced pancreatic tail cancer with colonic perforation using a multidisciplinary approach. CASE REPORT A 66-year-old man presented to our hospital with a chief concern of high fever. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a pancreatic tail tumor infiltrating the neighboring organs and causing colonic obstruction with perforation, which resulted in an intra-abdominal abscess. Colonoscopy revealed obstruction of the descending colon by extramural invasion. Laboratory tests showed high tumor marker concentrations (carcinoembryonic antigen, 11.6 ng/dL; pancreatic cancer-associated antigen-2, >1600 U/mL). We clinically diagnosed locally advanced pancreatic tail cancer with an intra-abdominal abscess caused by colonic perforation. First, we performed transverse colostomy and percutaneous drainage. We then started neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for tumor shrinkage and prevention of distant metastases. The therapeutic effect was a partial response, and no distant metastases was found. We therefore performed radical surgery comprising distal pancreatectomy with partial resection of neighboring organs. Although pathological examination revealed a pancreatic tail tubular adenocarcinoma with direct invasion of the neighboring organs, R0 resection was achieved. The patient was discharged with no perioperative complications. Tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium were administered as adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient remained recurrence-free for 19 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS We achieved successful en bloc resection of a locally advanced distal pancreatic cancer with colonic perforation by using a multidisciplinary approach.

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Recently, the first randomized trials comparing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for non-malignant and malignant disease showed a 2-day reduction in time to functional recovery after MIDP. However, for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), concerns have been raised regarding the oncologic safety (i.e., radical resection, lymph node retrieval, and survival) of MIDP, as compared to ODP. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial comparing MIDP and ODP in PDAC regarding oncological safety is warranted. We hypothesize that the microscopically radical resection (R0) rate is non-inferior for MIDP, as compared to ODP.

METHODS/DESIGN

DIPLOMA is an international randomized controlled, patient- and pathologist-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 38 pancreatic centers in Europe and the USA. A total of 258 patients with an indication for elective distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy because of proven or highly suspected PDAC of the pancreatic body or tail will be randomly allocated to MIDP (laparoscopic or robot-assisted) or ODP in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the microscopically radical resection margin (R0, distance tumor to pancreatic transection and posterior margin ≥ 1 mm), which is assessed using a standardized histopathology assessment protocol. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected R0 rate in the open group of 58%, expected R0 resection rate in the minimally invasive group of 67%, and a non-inferiority margin of 7%. Secondary outcomes include time to functional recovery, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, and conversion to open surgery), other histopathology findings (e.g., lymph node retrieval, perineural- and lymphovascular invasion), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications, hospital stay, and administration of adjuvant treatment), time and site of disease recurrence, survival, quality of life, and costs. Follow-up will be performed at the outpatient clinic after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

The DIPLOMA trial is designed to investigate the non-inferiority of MIDP versus ODP regarding the microscopically radical resection rate of PDAC in an international setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN44897265 . Prospectively registered on 16 April 2018.

Multiple cylindrical interstitial laser ablations (CILAs) of porcine pancreas in ex vivo and in vivo models

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic capacity of multiple cylindrical interstitial laser ablations (CILAs) of pancreatic tissue was evaluated with 1064 nm laser light in ex vivo and in vivo porcine pancreatic models.

METHODS

A diffusing applicator was sequentially employed to deliver 1064 nm laser light in a cylindrical distribution to ablate a large volume of pancreatic tissue. Ex vivo tissue was tested at various power levels (5, 7, and 10 W) under US imaging. An in vivo porcine model was used to evaluate the clinical feasibility of multiple CILAs on pancreatic tissue at 5 W via laparotomy (N = 3).

RESULTS

Multiple CILAs symmetrically ablated a range of ex vivo tissue volumes (2.4-6.0 cm³) at various power levels. Multiple CILAs warranted a therapeutic capacity of symmetrically ablating in vivo pancreatic tissue. Both ex vivo and in vivo pancreatic tissues after multiple CILAs at 5 W confirmed the absence of or minimal thermal injury to the peripheral tissue and carbonization.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings suggest that the collective thermal effects from multiple CILAs can help widely ablate pancreatic tissue with minimal thermal injury. Further in vivo studies will investigate the safety of the proposed CILA treatment as well as acute/chronic responses of pancreatic tissue for clinical translations.

[Surgery for periampullary pancreatic cancer]

Periampullary neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of different tumor entities arising from the periampullary region, of which pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common subgroup with 60-70%. As typical for pancreatic adenocarcinomas, periampullary pancreatic cancer is characterized by an aggressive growth and early systemic progression. Due to the anatomical location in close relationship to the papilla of Vater symptoms occur at an earlier stage of the disease, so that treatment options and prognosis are overall more favorable compared to pancreatic carcinomas at other locations. Nevertheless, the principles of treatment for periampullary pancreatic cancer are not substantially different from the standards for pancreatic cancer at other locations. A potentially curative approach for non-metastatic periampullary pancreatic cancer is a multimodal therapy concept, which includes partial pancreatoduodenectomy as a radical oncological resection in combination with a systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. As a result, long-term survival can be achieved in patients with favorable prognostic factors. In addition, with the continous development of surgery and systemic treatment potentially curative treatment concepts for advanced initially nonresectable tumors were also established, after completion of neoadjuvant treatment. This article presents the current surgical principles of a radical oncological resection for periampullary pancreatic cancer in the context of a multimodal treatment concept with an outlook for future developments of treatment.

Indications to total pancreatectomy for positive neck margin after partial pancreatectomy: a review of a slippery ground

The extension of a partial pancreatectomy up to total pancreatectomy because of positive neck margin examined at intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis is an accepted procedure in modern pancreatic surgery with good accuracy. The goal of this practice is to improve the rate of radical (R0) resection in malignant tumors, mainly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and to completely resect pre-invasive neoplasms such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). In the setting of IPMNs there is a consensus for pancreatic re-resection when high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer are present at the neck margin. The presence of denudation is another indication for further resection in IPMNs. The role of IFS analysis in the management of pancreatic cancer is more debated. The presence of a positive intraoperative transection margin can be considered the surrogate of a biologically aggressive disease associated with a poorer prognosis. There are conflicting data regarding possible advantages of pancreatic re-resection up to total pancreatectomy, and the lack of randomized trials comparing different strategies does not offer a definitive answer. The goal of this review is to provide an up-to-date overview of the role IFS analysis of pancreatic margin and of pancreatic re-resection up to total pancreatectomy considering different pancreatic tumors.

What do surgeons need to know about the mesopancreas

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy is the only treatment with a promise of cure for patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, and a negative resection margin is an important factor related to overall survival. Complete clearance of the medial margin with removal of the so-called mesopancreas may decrease the recurrence rate after pancreatic resection. Here, we present some important information about the mesopancreas, total mesopancreas excision, and technical aspects to achieve negative resection margins. The area named mesopancreas is defined as the tissue located between the head of the pancreas and the superior mesenteric vessels and the celiac axis and consists of the nerve plexus, lymphatic tissue, and connective tissue. The superior mesenteric and celiac arteries define the border of the mesopancreas. En bloc resection of anterior and posterior pancreatoduodenal nodes, hepatoduodenal nodes, along the superior mesenteric artery nodes, pyloric nodes, and nodes along the common hepatic artery is necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the region and technical refinements of excision of the mesopancreas along with standardized pathological examination are important to increase and to determine radical resection of pancreatic head cancer.

Technical advances in surgery for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Multimodal treatment concepts enhance options for surgery in locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This review provides an overview of technical advances to facilitate curative-intent resection in PDAC.

METHODS

A review of the literature addressing current technical advances in surgery for PDAC was performed, and current state-of-the-art surgical techniques summarized.

RESULTS

Artery-first and uncinate-first approaches, dissection of the anatomical triangle between the coeliac and superior mesenteric arteries and the portomesenteric vein, and radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy were introduced to enhance the completeness of resection and reduce the risk of local recurrence. Elaborated techniques for resection and reconstruction of the mesenteric-portal vein axis and a venous bypass graft-first approach frequently allow resection of PDAC with venous involvement, even in patients with portal venous congestion and cavernous transformation. Arterial involvement does not preclude surgical resection per se, but may become surgically manageable with recent techniques of arterial divestment or arterial resection following neoadjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSION

Advanced techniques of surgical resection and vessel reconstruction provide a toolkit for curative-intent surgery in borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC. Effects of these surgical approaches on overall survival remain to be proven with high-level clinical evidence.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Survival Following Margin-Positive Resection for Pancreatic Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A positive microscopic margin (R1) following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can occur in up to 80% of patients and is associated with reduced survival and increased recurrence. Our aim was to characterize the impact of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) on survival and recurrence in patients with PDAC following an R1 resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC who underwent pancreatectomy from 2008 to 2017 was performed. Patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition and stratified based on resection margin (R0 vs. R1) and treatment sequence (NAT vs. surgery first [SF]). Conditional survival analysis was performed using Cox regression and inverse probability weighted estimates.

RESULTS

Among 580 patients, 59% received NAT and 41% underwent SF. On final pathology, the NAT cohort had smaller tumors and less lymph node (LN) positivity (p < 0.05). NAT was not associated with an R1 resection (50%, p = 0.653). Compared with the R1 cohort, the R0 cohort had a higher median overall survival (OS; 39.6 vs. 22.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS; 19 vs. 13 months; HR 1.35, p = 0.004). After risk adjustment, NAT was not associated with OS, regardless of margin status (R0, 95% confidence interval [CI] (-)7.31-27.07, p = 0.26; or R1, 95% CI (-)36.99-15.25, p = 0.42). However, NAT was associated with improved DFS in the R1 cohort (95% CI 1.79-11.91, p = 0.008) but not in the R0 cohort (95% CI (-)11.22-10.54, p = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

An R0 resection remains an important determinant of overall and disease-free survival, even when NAT is administered. For patients with an R1 resection, receipt of NAT may prolong DFS.

Margin ACcentuation for resectable Pancreatic cancer using Irreversible Electroporation - Results from the MACPIE-I study

INTRODUCTION

Margin accentuation (MA) using Irreversible electroporation (IRE) offers an unique opportunity to reduce the R1 resections in resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). This study aims to assess the rate of margin positivity using IRE for MA during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for resectable pancreatic head tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following ethical approval, MA using IRE was carried out in 20 consecutive patients to posterior and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) margin, and the pancreatic neck, prior to the PD resection. The control group (non-IRE; n = 91) underwent PD without MA over the study period, March 2018 to March 2020.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups in terms of patients' age, gender, pre-op biliary drainage, site of malignancy or pre-operative TNM stage. The overall margin positive rate for IRE group was lesser (35.0%) when compared to non-IRE group (51.6%; p = 0.177), with significantly less posterior pancreatic margin positivity (5.0% vs. 25.3%; p = 0.046). When only treated margins (SMA margin excluded) were compared, the IRE group had significantly lower margin positive rates (20.0% vs. 51.6%; p = 0.013). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of intra- or post-operative complications. With a median follow-up of 15.6 months, the median DFS and OS for IRE and non-IRE groups were 17 and 18 months (p = 0.306) and 19 and 22 months (p = 0.227) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study confirms the safety of MA using IRE for RPC, with reduction in margin positivity. These results as a proof of concept are promising and need further validation with a randomised controlled trial.

Contemporary Reappraisal of Intraoperative Neck Margin Assessment During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Review

Importance

Although margin-negative (R0) resection is the gold standard for surgical management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the question of how to manage the patient with a microscopically positive intraoperative neck margin (IONM) during pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial.

Observations

In the absence of randomized clinical trials, we critically evaluated high-quality retrospective studies examining the oncologic utility of re-resecting positive IONMs during pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC (2000-2019). Several studies have concluded that additional pancreatic resection to achieve an R0 margin in IONM-positive cases does not influence survival. The largest is a multi-institutional study of 1399 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, which demonstrated that in comparison with patients undergoing R0 resection (n = 1196; median survival, 21 months), those with either final R1 resections (n = 131) or undergoing margin conversion from IONM-positive to R0 resection on permanent section (n = 72) demonstrated similar median survival times (13.7 and 11.9 months, respectively). Conversely, recent reports suggest that the conversion of IONM to R0 resection with additional resection or even total pancreatectomy may be associated with improved survival. The discordance between these conflicting studies could be explained in part by the influence of biologic and physiologic selection on the association of IONM re-resection and survival. Since most studies did not include patients receiving modern combination chemotherapy regimens, the intersection between margin status, tumor biology, and chemoresponsiveness remains unclear. Furthermore, there are no dedicated data to guide surgical management in IONM-positive pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although data regarding the oncologic utility of additional resection to achieve a tumor-free margin following initial IONM positivity during pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC are conflicting, they suggest that IONM positivity may be a surrogate for biologic aggressiveness that is unlikely to be mitigated by the extent of surgical resection. The complex relationship between margin status and chemoresponsiveness warrants exploration in studies including patients receiving increasingly effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Division of the pancreas at the neck reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Comparison of pancreatic division at the body

BACKGROUND

objectives: During laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), the optimal site for pancreatic division with consideration of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is unclear. We evaluate which site of pancreatic division, neck or body, has better outcomes after LDP.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study. LDP was performed in 102 consecutive patients between December 2009 and May 2020. After excluding 14 patients with pancreatic division at tail, 88 patients (pancreatic division at neck n = 46, at body n = 42) were included in this study. Short- and long-term outcomes after LDP were compared between pancreatic division at neck and body.

RESULTS

The pancreatic transection site was thicker at body than at neck (17.5 vs. 11.9 mm, P < 0.001), although there were no significant differences of pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct size. The Grade B/C POPF rate was significantly higher when the pancreas was divided at body than when divided at neck (21.4 vs. 6.5%, P = 0.042). We found no significant differences between pancreatic division at neck and body in residual pancreatic volume (34.0 vs. 34.8 ml, P = 0.855), incidence of new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus more than six months after LDP (P = 0.218), or body weight change (six-month: P = 0.116, one-year: P = 0.108, two-year: P = 0.195, tree-year: P = 0.131, four-year: P = 0.608, five-year: P = 0.408).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the pancreatic division at neck might reduce the Grade B/C POPF incidence after LDP, compared to division at body. A potential reason is that the pancreas at body is thicker than that at neck. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm our results.