1
|
Boggi U, Kauffmann E, Napoli N, Barreto SG, Besselink MG, Fusai GK, Hackert T, Abu Hilal M, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Shrikhande S, Truty M, Werner J, Wolfgang C, Bannone E, Capretti G, Cattelani A, Coppola A, Cucchetti A, De Sio D, Di Dato A, Di Meo G, Fiorillo C, Gianfaldoni C, Ginesini M, Hidalgo Salinas C, Lai Q, Miccoli M, Montorsi R, Pagnanelli M, Poli A, Ricci C, Sucameli F, Tamburrino D, Viti V, Addeo PF, Alfieri S, Bachellier P, Baiocchi G, Balzano G, Barbarello L, Brolese A, Busquets J, Butturini G, Caniglia F, Caputo D, Casadei R, Chunhua X, Colangelo E, Coratti A, Costa F, Crafa F, Dalla Valle R, De Carlis L, de Wilde RF, Del Chiaro M, Di Benedetto F, Di Sebastiano P, Domak S, Hogg M, Egorov VI, Ercolani G, Ettorre GM, Falconi M, Ferrari G, Ferrero A, Filauro M, Giardino A, Grazi GL, Gruttaduaria S, Izbicki JR, Jovine E, Katz M, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kiguchi G, Kooby D, Lang H, Lombardo C, Malleo G, Massani M, Mazzaferro V, Memeo R, Miao Y, Mishima K, Molino C, Nagakawa Y, Nakamura M, Nardo B, Panaro F, Pasquali C, Perrone V, Rangelova E, Riu L, Romagnoli R, Romito R, Rosso E, Schulick R, Siriwardena A, Spampinato M, Strobel O, Testini M, Troisi R, Uzunoglo FG, Valente R, Veneroni L, Zerbi A, Vicente E, Vistoli F, Vivarelli M, Wakabayashi G, Zanus G, Zureikat A, Zyromski NJ, Coppola R, D'Andrea V, Davide J, Dervenis C, Frigerio I, Konlon KC, Michelassi F, Montorsi M, Nealon W, Portolani N, Sousa Silva D, Bozzi G, Ferrari V, Trivella MG, Cameron J, Clavien PA, Asbun HJ. REDISCOVER International Guidelines on the Perioperative Care of Surgical Patients With Borderline-resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00795. [PMID: 38407228 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The REDISCOVER consensus conference aimed at developing and validate guidelines on the perioperative care of patients with borderline resectable (BR-) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Coupled with improvements in chemotherapy and radiation, the contemporary approach to pancreatic surgery supports resection of BR-PDAC and, to a lesser extent, LA-PDAC. Guidelines outlining the selection and perioperative care for these patients are lacking. METHODS The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used to develop the REDISCOVER guidelines and create recommendations. The Delphi approach was used to reach consensus (agreement ≥80%) among experts. Recommendations were approved after a debate and vote among international experts in pancreatic surgery and pancreatic cancer management. A Validation Committee used the AGREE II-GRS tool to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines. Moreover, an independent multidisciplinary advisory group revised the statements to ensure adherence to non-surgical guidelines. RESULTS Overall, 34 recommendations were created targeting centralization, training, staging, patient selection for surgery, possibility of surgery in uncommon scenarios, timing of surgery, avoidance of vascular reconstruction, details of vascular resection/reconstruction, arterial divestment, frozen section histology of perivascular tissue, extent of lymphadenectomy, anticoagulation prophylaxis and role of minimally invasive surgery. The level of evidence was however low for 29 of 34 clinical questions. Participants agreed that the most conducive mean to promptly advance our understanding in this field is to establish an international registry addressing this patient population ( https://rediscover.unipi.it/ ). CONCLUSIONS The REDISCOVER guidelines provide clinical recommendations pertaining to pancreatectomy with vascular resection for patients with BR- and LA-PDAC, and serve as the basis of a new international registry for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - S George Barreto
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Center, Beadfor Park, Australia
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Shailesh Shrikhande
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Gastrointestinal and HPB Service, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Mark Truty
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, LMU, University of Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Alice Cattelani
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna; Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide De Sio
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Armando Di Dato
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanna Di Meo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J) University of Bari, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cesare Gianfaldoni
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Michael Ginesini
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Quirino Lai
- Department of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Miccoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Montorsi
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Andrea Poli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudio Ricci
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy, Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (IRCCS AOUBO)
| | - Francesco Sucameli
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Domenico Tamburrino
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Virginia Viti
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pietro F Addeo
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and UOC General Surgery, ASST Cremona, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Linda Barbarello
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Brolese
- Department of General Surgery & HPB Unit, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Juli Busquets
- Division of Pancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Caniglia
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200,00128 Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy, Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna (IRCCS AOUBO)
| | - Xi Chunhua
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
- Pancreas Institute, Nanjing Medical University
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
| | - Ettore Colangelo
- Department of General Surgery, "G. Mazzini" Hospital, Teramo, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, AUSL Toscana Sud Est, Misericordia Hospital of Grosseto, Italy
| | - Francesca Costa
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Crafa
- Division of General, Oncological and Robotic Surgery, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino Italy
| | | | - Luciano De Carlis
- Division of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Hospital , University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Di Sebastiano
- Surgical Oncology, Pierangeli Clinic, Department of Innovative Technology in Medicine & Dentistry, G. D'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Safi Domak
- department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Melissa Hogg
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Vyacheslav I Egorov
- Department for Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery, Ilyinskaya Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna; Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation. San Camillo Forlanini Hospital-POIT. Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, "Umberto I" Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Filauro
- Department of Surgery Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giardino
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Division of HepatoBiliaryPancreatic Surgery, AOU Careggi, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttaduaria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy (UPMC Italy), Palermo, Italy
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of general visceral and thoracic surgery, University Hospital Eppendorf University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Matthew Katz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Igor Khatkov
- Department of High Technology Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center. Moscow, Russia
| | - Gozo Kiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - David Kooby
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hauke Lang
- University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
| | - Carlo Lombardo
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of HPB Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
- Pancreas Institute, Nanjing Medical University
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
- Pancreas Center, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Research Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - Carlo Molino
- Department of General and Speciality Surgery, General and Pancreatic Surgery Team 1, AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Bruno Nardo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery and Robotic, Annunziata Hub Hospital, School of Medicine Surgery and TD, University of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery & Transplantation. Montpellier University Hospital School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Claudio Pasquali
- Pancreatic & Digestive Endocrine Surgery Research Group - Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Vittorio Perrone
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery at the Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery at the Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Long Riu
- Second Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Renato Romagnoli
- Division of General Surgery 2U - Liver Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Raffaele Romito
- Division of General Surgery II and HPB Unit, A.O.U. Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Novara, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Service de Chirurgie Générale, Mini-Invasive et Robotique, Centre Hôspitalier de
| | - Richard Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine. Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ajith Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcello Spampinato
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J) University of Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Division of HBP, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service Federico II University Hospital - Naples, Italy
| | - Faik G Uzunoglo
- Department of general visceral and thoracic surgery, University Hospital Eppendorf University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Luigi Veneroni
- Chirurgia Generale, Infermi Hospital Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | | | - Emilio Vicente
- Sanchinarro University Hospital, General Surgery Department, San Pablo University, CEU, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- Division of General Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Division of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplantation Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ospedali Riuniti delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Second Division of Surgery-Treviso-Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DiSCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas J Zyromski
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Roberto Coppola
- Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200,00128 Rome, Italy
- Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - José Davide
- Department of Surgery, HEBIPA - Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Unit, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Isabella Frigerio
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Kevin C Konlon
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fabrizio Michelassi
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital at Weill Cornell, New Yourk, NY, USA
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Italy
- Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - William Nealon
- Department of Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA; Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Donzília Sousa Silva
- Department of Surgery, HEBIPA - Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Unit, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - John Cameron
- Department of Surgery, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ratti F, Marino R, Olthof PB, Pratschke J, Erdmann JI, Neumann UP, Prasad R, Jarnagin WR, Schnitzbauer AA, Cescon M, Guglielmi A, Lang H, Nadalin S, Topal B, Maithel SK, Hoogwater FJH, Alikhanov R, Troisi R, Sparrelid E, Roberts KJ, Malagò M, Hagendoorn J, Malik HZ, Olde Damink SWM, Kazemier G, Schadde E, Charco R, de Reuver PR, Groot Koerkamp B, Aldrighetti L. Predicting futility of upfront surgery in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Machine learning analytics model to optimize treatment allocation. Hepatology 2024; 79:341-354. [PMID: 37530544 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While resection remains the only curative option for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, it is well known that such surgery is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, beyond facing life-threatening complications, patients may also develop early disease recurrence, defining a "futile" outcome in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery. The aim of this study is to predict the high-risk category (futile group) where surgical benefits are reversed and alternative treatments may be considered. METHODS The study cohort included prospectively maintained data from 27 Western tertiary referral centers: the population was divided into a development and a validation cohort. The Framingham Heart Study methodology was used to develop a preoperative scoring system predicting the "futile" outcome. RESULTS A total of 2271 cases were analyzed: among them, 309 were classified within the "futile group" (13.6%). American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score ≥ 3 (OR 1.60; p = 0.005), bilirubin at diagnosis ≥50 mmol/L (OR 1.50; p = 0.025), Ca 19-9 ≥ 100 U/mL (OR 1.73; p = 0.013), preoperative cholangitis (OR 1.75; p = 0.002), portal vein involvement (OR 1.61; p = 0.020), tumor diameter ≥3 cm (OR 1.76; p < 0.001), and left-sided resection (OR 2.00; p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of futility. The point system developed, defined three (ie, low, intermediate, and high) risk classes, which showed good accuracy (AUC 0.755) when tested on the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS The possibility to accurately estimate, through a point system, the risk of severe postoperative morbidity and early recurrence, could be helpful in defining the best management strategy (surgery vs. nonsurgical treatments) according to preoperative features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milano, Italy
| | - Rebecca Marino
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milano, Italy
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of General, Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Raj Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Unit of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Frederik J H Hoogwater
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Liver and Pancreatic Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Massimo Malagò
- Department of HPB- and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of General, Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ramon Charco
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milano, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boggi U, Donisi G, Napoli N, Partelli S, Esposito A, Ferrari G, Butturini G, Morelli L, Abu Hilal M, Viola M, Di Benedetto F, Troisi R, Vivarelli M, Jovine E, Ferrero A, Bracale U, Alfieri S, Casadei R, Ercolani G, Moraldi L, Molino C, Dalla Valle R, Ettorre G, Memeo R, Zanus G, Belli A, Gruttadauria S, Brolese A, Coratti A, Garulli G, Romagnoli R, Massani M, Borghi F, Belli G, Coppola R, Falconi M, Salvia R, Zerbi A. Correction to: Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022. Updates Surg 2024; 76:327-328. [PMID: 38041779 PMCID: PMC10805981 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01709-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Greta Donisi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, OSR ENETS Center of Excellence, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Viola
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Card. G. Panico, Tricase, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Division of HPB Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, "Umberto I" Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Bracale
- Department Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Molino
- Department of Oncological Surgery Team 1, "Antonio Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ettorre
- Transplantation Department, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- 4th Surgery Unit, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Brolese
- Department of General Surgery and HPB Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- USL Toscana Sud Est, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | | | - Renato Romagnoli
- Liver Transplant Center-General Surgery 2U, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto Coppola
- Department of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, OSR ENETS Center of Excellence, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boggi U, Donisi G, Napoli N, Partelli S, Esposito A, Ferrari G, Butturini G, Morelli L, Abu Hilal M, Viola M, Di Benedetto F, Troisi R, Vivarelli M, Jovine E, Ferrero A, Bracale U, Alfieri S, Casadei R, Ercolani G, Moraldi L, Molino C, Dalla Valle R, Ettorre G, Memeo R, Zanus G, Belli A, Gruttadauria S, Brolese A, Coratti A, Garulli G, Romagnoli R, Massani M, Borghi F, Belli G, Coppola R, Falconi M, Salvia R, Zerbi A. Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1439-1456. [PMID: 37470915 PMCID: PMC10435655 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01592-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
This retrospective analysis of the prospective IGOMIPS registry reports on 1191 minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) performed in Italy between 2019 and 2022, including 668 distal pancreatectomies (DP) (55.7%), 435 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) (36.3%), 44 total pancreatectomies (3.7%), 36 tumor enucleations (3.0%), and 8 central pancreatectomies (0.7%). Spleen-preserving DP was performed in 109 patients (16.3%). Overall incidence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) was 17.6% with a 90-day mortality of 1.9%. This registry analysis provided some important information. First, robotic assistance was preferred for all MIPR but DP with splenectomy. Second, robotic assistance reduced conversion to open surgery and blood loss in comparison to laparoscopy. Robotic PD was also associated with lower incidence of severe postoperative complications and a trend toward lower mortality. Fourth, the annual cut-off of ≥ 20 MIPR and ≥ 20 MIPD improved selected outcome measures. Fifth, most MIPR were performed by a single surgeon. Sixth, only two-thirds of the centers performed spleen-preserving DP. Seventh, DP with splenectomy was associated with higher conversion rate when compared to spleen-preserving DP. Eighth, the use of pancreatojejunostomy was the prevalent reconstruction in PD. Ninth, final histology was similar for MIPR performed at high- and low-volume centers, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently at high-volume centers. Finally, this registry analysis raises important concerns about the reliability of R1 assessment underscoring the importance of standardized pathology of pancreatic specimens. In conclusion, MIPR can be safely implemented on a national scale. Further analyses are required to understand nuances of implementation of MIPR in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Greta Donisi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, OSR ENETS Center of Excellence, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Viola
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Card. G. Panico, Tricase, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Division of HPB Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Riuniti Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, "Umberto I" Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Bracale
- Department Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Molino
- Department of Oncological Surgery Team 1, "Antonio Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ettorre
- Transplantation Department, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- 4th Surgery Unit, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Brolese
- Department of General Surgery and HPB Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- USL Toscana Sud Est, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | | | - Renato Romagnoli
- Liver Transplant Center-General Surgery 2U, University of Turin, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto Coppola
- Department of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, OSR ENETS Center of Excellence, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cucchetti A, Djulbegovic B, Crippa S, Hozo I, Sbrancia M, Tsalatsanis A, Binda C, Fabbri C, Salvia R, Falconi M, Ercolani G, Amato A, Amisano M, Anderloni A, Maestri A, Coluccio C, Brandi G, Casadei-Gardini A, Cennamo V, Crinò SF, Valle RD, De Angelis C, Di Battista M, Di Maio M, Di Marco M, Di Marco M, Di Matteo F, Di Mitri R, Ettorre GM, Facciorusso A, Farina G, Ferrari G, Fornaro L, Frigerio I, Frisone D, Fuccio L, Gardini A, Garufi C, Giampieri R, Grazi GL, Jovine E, Kauffmann E, Langella S, Larghi A, Manno M, Marciano E, Marzioni M, Merighi A, Mutignani M, Nardo B, Niger M, Palmisano V, Partelli S, Pinto C, Piras E, Rapposelli IG, Reni M, Ricci C, Rimassa L, Siena S, Spada C, Sperti E, Spezzaferro M, Sposito C, Tamberi S, Troisi R, Veneroni L, Vivarelli M, Zerbi A. Regret affects the choice between neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Surgery 2023; 173:1421-1427. [PMID: 36932008 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When treating potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, therapeutic decisions are left to the sensibility of treating clinicians who, faced with a decision that post hoc can be proven wrong, may feel a sense of regret that they want to avoid. A regret-based decision model was applied to evaluate attitudes toward neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS Three clinical scenarios describing high-, intermediate-, and low-risk disease-specific mortality after upfront surgery were presented to 60 respondents (20 oncologists, 20 gastroenterologists, and 20 surgeons). Respondents were asked to report their regret of omission and commission regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy on a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were applied to analyze respondents' attitudes toward neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS The lowest regret of omission was elicited in the low-risk scenario, and the highest regret in the high-risk scenario (P < .001). The regret of the commission was diametrically opposite to the regret of omission (P ≤ .001). The disease-specific threshold mortality at which upfront surgery is favored over the neoadjuvant therapy progressively decreased from the low-risk to the high-risk scenarios (P ≤ .001). The nonsurgeons working in or with lower surgical volume centers (P = .010) and surgeons (P = .018) accepted higher disease-specific mortality after upfront surgery, which resulted in the lower likelihood of adopting neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION Regret drives decision making in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Being a surgeon or a specialist working in surgical centers with lower patient volumes reduces the likelihood of recommending neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Italy; Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
| | - Benjamin Djulbegovic
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine - Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Università Vita-Salute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iztok Hozo
- Department of Mathematics and Actuarial Science, Indiana University Northwest, Gary, IN
| | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Athanasios Tsalatsanis
- Office of Research, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Università Vita-Salute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Italy; Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Olij B, Fichtinger RS, Kimman M, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Troisi R, Suttcliffe R, Besselink MG, Aroori S, Menon K, Edwin B, D'Hondt M, Lucidi V, Ulmer TF, Diaz-Nieto R, Soonawalla Z, White S, Sergeant G, Primrose JN, Van Dam RM. Patient reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy within an enhanced recovery program, the ORANGE-II-PLUS Randomized Clinical trial: A Quality of Life and Body image analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
|
7
|
Landi I, Alharbi S, Alfehaid A, Eltayed A, Aldosari SR, Pirisi M, Troisi R, Vriz O. 669 ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC PREDICTORS FOR MORTALITY IN LIVER TRANSPLANT. Eur Heart J Suppl 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac121.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aim
According to the evidence, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy affects about 50% of patients with cirrhosis.). The aim of our study was to evaluate pre- and post-surgery transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters in a cohort of patients undergoing liver transplant (LT) and their relationship with LT complications and mortality.
Methods
We recruited 102 (61 males, 59.8%; median age 59 [54-65] years) patients who underwent comprehensive TTE before and after LT and compared TTE parameters measured before and after LT.
Results
At the end of the follow-up, 76 patients (74.5%) survived, 16 (15.7%) died and 10 (9.8%) were lost at follow-up. Both, left and right side heart chambers significantly decreased after LT as did left ventricular function (EF from 62,9% to 58,8%, p<0,001; global longitudinal strain from -21,5 to -18,13, p<0,001) and right ventricular function (TAPSE from 24mm to 21mm, p<0,001; FAC from 51,54% to 49,14%, p=0,003; right ventricular global strain from pre-LT -23,66 vs post-LT -19,94, p<0,001). Though pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPs) did not change significantly, RV-pulmonary arterial coupling was significantly lower after LT either as TAPSE/PASP (0.9 vs 0.8, p=0.02). Interestingly, post-LT PASP was significantly higher in the group that did not survive. Furthermore higher difference in PASP between pre and post-LT TTE, and TAPSE (Diff PASP HR 1,044, p- value 0,01, C.I 1,01-1,08; TAPSE Diff HR 1,088, p- value 0,03, C.I 1,01-1,17) were determinant of increased risk for death combined with LV EF.
Conclusions
Our data suggest that elevated PASP and lower TAPSE have been associated with increased risk of death after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Landi
- Dipartimento Di Medicina Trasplazionale, Università Del Piemonte Orientale , Novara, Italia
| | - Suliman Alharbi
- Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital And Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Alfehaid
- Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital And Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdalla Eltayed
- Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital And Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah Radaan Aldosari
- Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital And Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| | - Mario Pirisi
- Dipartimento Di Medicina Trasplazionale, Università Del Piemonte Orientale , Novara, Italia
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Unità Operativa Complessa Di Chirurgia Bilio-Pancreatica , Mini-Invasiva E Robotica, Aou Federico Ii, Napoili, Italia
| | - Olga Vriz
- Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital And Research Centre , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Dam RM, Fichtinger R, Aldrighetti L, Troisi R, Hilal MA, Sutcliffe R, Besselink M, Aroori S, Menon K, Edwin B, D'Hondt M, Lucidi V, Ulmer F, Díaz-Nieto R, Soonawalla Z, White S, Sergeant G, Brandts L, Primrose J. Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
Liver surgery is the first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Minimally invasive liver resection (MILS) has become an attractive option thanks to reduced intraoperative blood losses, shortened length of hospital stay, and similar oncological outcomes when compared to open liver resection. Nonetheless, the safety of MILS is still debated in challenging situations, such as in cirrhotic patients, difficult tumor locations, multiple or large tumors, and repeat resection. The aim of this review is to discuss current indications of laparoscopic liver resection for HCC treatment in the light of its outcomes, focusing on technical aspects of minimally invasive anatomic liver resection and state of the art of MILS in challenging situations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rompianesi G, Di Martino M, Gordon-Weeks A, Montalti R, Troisi R. Liquid biopsy in cholangiocarcinoma: Current status and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:332-350. [PMID: 34040697 PMCID: PMC8131901 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i5.332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are a heterogeneous group of tumors in terms of aetiology, natural history, morphological subtypes, molecular alterations and management, but all sharing complex diagnosis, management, and poor prognosis. Several mutated genes and epigenetic changes have been detected in CCA, with the potential to identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Accessing tumoral components and genetic material is therefore crucial for the diagnosis, management and selection of targeted therapies; but sampling tumor tissue, when possible, is often risky and difficult to be repeated at different time points. Liquid biopsy (LB) represents a way to overcome these issues and comprises a diverse group of methodologies centering around detection of tumor biomarkers from fluid samples. Compared to the traditional tissue sampling methods LB is less invasive and can be serially repeated, allowing a real-time monitoring of the tumor genetic profile or the response to therapy. In this review, we analysis the current evidence on the possible roles of LB (circulating DNA, circulating RNA, exosomes, cytokines) in the diagnosis and management of patients affected by CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Rompianesi
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Alex Gordon-Weeks
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Napoli 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Broering D, Shawkat M, Albenmousa A, Abaalkhail F, Alabbad S, Al-Hamoudi W, Alghamdi S, Alqahthani S, Jaafari A, Troisi R, Bzeizi K. Validating controlled attenuation parameter in the assessment of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251487. [PMID: 33984017 PMCID: PMC8118256 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatic steatosis (HS) negatively impacts transplant outcomes in living liver donors. To date, liver biopsy is preferred for HS evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the measurement of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as a diagnostic tool of HS in living liver donors. METHODS Candidates recruited to this study, conducted from April 2016 to February 2020, were potential donors who had undergone transient elastography using Fibroscan® and CAP measurements at liver segments VI and VII, followed by liver biopsy. The HS grades from liver biopsy were classified as S0 (<5%), S1 (5-33%), S2 (33-66%), and S3 (>66%). For CAP, they were S0 (≤218dB/m), S1 (218-249dB/m)), S2 (250-305dB/m)), and S3 (>305dB/m)). The CAP measurements were compared with the liver biopsy results. RESULTS Of the 150 potential donors [male, 73.3%; mean age, 30.0±7.0 years; body mass index (BMI), 24.7±3.5kg/m2], 92 (61.3%) had no or mild HS, while 58 (38.7%) and 10% had moderate to severe HS based on CAP and liver biopsy, respectively. Subjects with moderate to severe HS per CAP were mostly males (0.014), and had higher BMI (p = .006), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (.001), gamma-glutamyl transferase (.026), and high-density lipoprotein (.008). On multivariate analysis, high ALT (OR, 1.051; 95% CI, 1.016-1.087; p = .004) was a predictor of significant HS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CAP to detect significant HS were 93.3%, 67.4, 24.1%, and 98.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION The high sensitivity and negative predictive values of CAP make it a good screening test to exclude significant HS in potential living liver donors which, in turn, can help avoid unnecessary liver biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter Broering
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Shawkat
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt
| | - Ali Albenmousa
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Abaalkhail
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alabbad
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waleed Al-Hamoudi
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad Alghamdi
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alqahthani
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad Jaafari
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Bzeizi
- Department of Liver & Small Bowel Transplantation & Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bzeizi KI, Albenmousa A, Shawkat M, Ahmed Z, Alabbad S, Al-Hamoudi W, Troisi R, Broering D. Efficacy and safety of once daily tacrolimus compared to twice daily tacrolimus after liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:375-383. [PMID: 33815679 PMCID: PMC8006077 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i3.375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Once daily tacrolimus regimen was found to exhibits similar bioavailability, safety and efficacy properties compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in kidney transplantation patients.
AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation patients.
METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases were searched for clinical trials until December 2020. Efficacy outcome measured as the rate of treatment failure indicated by biopsy-proven acute rejection, Serum creatinine, graft loss, or death. Two reviewers independently selected studies, collected data and assessed risk of bias. The results are reported as risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data.
RESULTS Seven studies included with 965 patients. All the included studies were of moderate quality according to the risk of bias assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was reported in four studies, and pooled analysis of those studies indicated similar rejections in both twice daily and once daily tacrolimus groups (risk ratio: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.84-1.34, n = 758, I2 = 0%) and also we found no significant difference between both groups for renal outcome (serum creatinine; mean difference, 0.001 mg/dL, 95%CI: -0.042 to 0.043, n = 846, I2 = 18.6%). Similarly, there was similar number of adverse events such as hypertension, headache, back pain, blood related disorders, infections and nausea observed in both groups.
CONCLUSION The analysis findings confirm that both once daily and twice daily tacrolimus formulations are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid Ibrahim Bzeizi
- Department of Liver Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Albenmousa
- Department of Liver Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Shawkat
- Department of Internal medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia 1234, Egypt
| | - Zidan Ahmed
- Department of Liver and Small Bowel Transplantation and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alabbad
- Department of Liver and Small Bowel Transplantation and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waleed Al-Hamoudi
- Department of Liver and Small Bowel Transplantation and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of Liver and Small Bowel Transplantation and Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Deiter Broering
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hosp and Res Ctr, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Alharbi SM, Alfehaid A, Eltayeb A, Alsomali A, Galzerano D, Alamro B, Pirisi M, Troisi R, Vriz O. Cardiovascular adaptation after liver transplantation. Ventricular changes detect by 2d echocardiography and by speckle tracking. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Background. Patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) may suffer from heart disease that can be related to the liver disease itself or to other associated pathologies. It has been suggested that there is a specific heart disease associated with cirrhosis, termed cirrhotic cardiomyopathy which is characterized by the presence of increased baseline cardiac output, systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and increased in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). The aim of the study was to evaluate the cardiac structural and functional changes after LT and eventually to determine the improvement in PASP.
Method. 51 patients were considered for the analysis who had a good quality pre and post LT echocardiograms. The echo-study was done preLT and repeated within 4 months and 3 years after LT. All studies were red of-line, global longitudinal stains (GLS) of the LV and right ventricle (RV) were analyzed using TOMTEC application. A Paired T-test was used to compare the echocardiographic parameters. The group was also divided according to tertiles of pre LT PASP for the evaluation of pulmonary pressure.
Results . Patients` mean age was 58.1 ± 7.8 years, 32 (62.6%) men, mean time between the 2 echocardiographic studies was 529.2 ± 471 days. After LT all the patients were on immunosuppressant therapy (calcineurin inhibitors, ciclosporin and/or tacrolimus). After LT blood pressure (BP) (83.4 ± 16 vs 91.5 ± 14 mmHg, p = 0.009 for mean BP ), heart rate (72.5 ± 15.2 vs 80.6 ± 15.3 bpm, p = 0.004), increased as LV mass index (78.6 ± 21.1 to 91.4 ± 29, p= 0.003) and relative wall thickness (0.34 ± 0.06 to 0.39 ± 0.08, p = 0.001). LV ejection fraction did not change while there was a significant decrease in LV GLS (-20.9 ± 4.4% vs -17.4 ± 3.9%, p < 0.0001), impaired diastolic function (E/A 1.12 ± 0.5 vs 0.94 ± 0.4, p = 0.002) and increase in LV diastolic filling pressure (E/E’ 7.7 ± 3.6 vs 8.9 ± 3.6, p = 0.018). PASP increased (26.6 ± 8 vs 30.8 ± 11 mmHg, p = 0.018) and TAPSE (24.1 ± 4.5 vs 21.6 ± 3.9 mm, p = 0.002) decresed. The pre and post echo data, were divided in preLT PASP to see if there was any tendency to decrease in PASP after LT. A progressive increase in LV remodeling and impaired diastolic function, RV- pulmonary arterial coupling decreased as an index of RV maladaptation to the increase PASP as tertiles of in PASP increased.
Conclusion. Increased in BP has been found in patients after LT , likely related to immensuppressive therapy. LV remodeling, impaired diastolic function were likely a conseguence of increase in BP and the increased in PASP and worst RV- pulmonary circulation coupling was secondary to impaired diastolic function and increased filling pressure. After LT, patients require particular clinical attention and echocardiographic monitoring included GLS for target organ damage and prompt adequate therapy at least in terms of BP control to avoid later cardiovascular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SM Alharbi
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - A Alfehaid
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - A Eltayeb
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - A Alsomali
- Alfaisal University, School of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - D Galzerano
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - B Alamro
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Pirisi
- University of Eastern Piedmont, Internal Medicine, Novara, Italy
| | - R Troisi
- University Federico II, Chirurgia Generale, Naples, Italy
| | - O Vriz
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Viganò L, Torzilli G, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A, Troisi R, Figueras J, Cherqui D, Adam R, Kokudo N, Hasegawa K, Guglielmi A, Majno P, Toso C, Krawczyk M, Abu Hilal M, Pinna AD, Cescon M, Giuliante F, De Santibanes E, Costa-Maia J, Pawlik T, Urbani L, Zugna D. Stratification of Major Hepatectomies According to Their Outcome: Analysis of 2212 Consecutive Open Resections in Patients Without Cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2020; 272:827-833. [PMID: 32925253 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To stratify major hepatectomies (MajHs) according to their outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA MajHs are associated with non-negligible operative risks, but they include a wide range of procedures. Detailed depiction of the outcomes of different MajHs is the basis for a new classification of liver resections. METHODS We retrospectively considered patients that underwent hepatectomy in 17 high-volume centers. Patients with an associated digestive/biliary resection were excluded. We analyzed open MajHs in non-cirrhotic patients. MajHs were classified according to the Brisbane nomenclature. Right hepatectomies (RHs) were reference standards. Outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders, including indication, liver function, preoperative portal vein embolization, and enrolling center. RESULTS We analyzed a series of 2212 patients. In comparison with RH, left hepatectomy had lower mortality [0.6% vs 2.2%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.25], severe morbidity (11.7% vs 14.4%, OR = 0.62), and liver failure rates (2.1% vs 11.6%, OR = 0.16). Left hepatectomy+Sg1 and mesohepatectomy+/-Sg1 had outcomes similar to RH, except for higher bile leak rate (31.3% and 13.5% vs 6.7%, OR = 4.36 and OR = 2.29). RH + Sg1 had slightly worse outcomes than RH. Right and left trisectionectomies had higher mortality (5.0% and 7.3% vs 2.2%, OR = 2.07 and OR = 2.71) and liver failure rates than RH (19.0% and 22.0% vs 11.6%, OR = 2.03 and OR = 2.21). Left trisectionectomy had even higher severe morbidity (25.6% vs 14.4%, OR = 2.07) and bile leak rates (14.6% vs 6.7%, OR = 2.31). CONCLUSIONS The term "major hepatectomy" includes resections having heterogeneous outcome. Different MajHs can be stratified according to their mortality, severe morbidity, liver failure, and bile leak rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano - Milan, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano - Milan, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele - Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | - Pietro Majno
- University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Timothy Pawlik
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lucio Urbani
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniela Zugna
- Department of Medical Sciences, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Torino and CPO-Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Caballero C, Burock S, Carrion-Alvarez L, Nilsson H, Ruers T, Senellart P, Rivoire M, Stattner S, Primavesi F, Troisi R, Gruenberger T, Heil J, Schnitzbauer AA, Rahbari NN, Swijnenburg RJ, Malik H, Protic M, Kataoka K, Mauer M, Ducreux M, Poston G, Evrard S. Building a collaboration to improve surgical research through EORTC/ESSO 1409-CLIMB study: A prospective liver metastasis database with an integrated quality assurance program. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1870-1875. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
16
|
Laurent S, Verhelst X, Geerts A, Geboes K, De Man M, Troisi R, Vanlander A, Rogiers X, Berrevoet F, Van Vlierberghe H. Update on liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma : a review of the recent literature. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2019; 82:417-420. [PMID: 31566330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) represent 3% of all gastrointestinal tumours and can be classified anatomically in 3 types: intrahepatic (ICC), perihilar (PCC) and distal (DCC) cholangiocarcinomas. Resection is the treatment of choice but is only achieved in a few cases (<20%) because of invasion of the biliary tract and/or vascular structures. The outcome of advanced CC is poor with an overall survival (OS) of maximum 15 months with chemotherapy. In the 1990s, CC was regarded as a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). LT has recently been proposed as potentially curative option for ICC and PCC. Careful patient selection has changed OS. This article provides an update on current status of LT for patients with unresectable CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Laurent
- Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - X Verhelst
- Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Geerts
- Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Geboes
- Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - M De Man
- Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - R Troisi
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Vanlander
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - X Rogiers
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - F Berrevoet
- Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Caballero C, Alvarez LC, Nilsson H, Ruers T, Senellart P, Rivoire M, Staettner S, Primavesi F, Troisi R, Gruenberger T, Heil J, Schnitzbauer A, Rahbari N, Swijnenburg R, Malik H, Protic M, Neven A, Mauer M, Poston G, Evrard S. EORTC 1409 GITCG / ESSO 01 - A prospective colorectal liver metastasis database with an integrated quality assurance program (CLIMB): Primary analysis of variations in European clinical practices and surgical complications after complex liver metastasis surgeries. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
18
|
Kataoka K, Caballero C, Suto T, Masayuki O, Hyunseon C, Troisi R, Yasumasa T, Uetake H, Nobuhiro T, Kazuhiro Y, Hitoshi O, Kishi Y, Shiomi A, Ducreux M, Bonhomme B, Collette L, Rubbia-Brandt L, Brown G, Shiozawa M, Evrard S. Implementing Integrated Quality Assurance (SURCARE) for EORTC-JCOG 1527 / ESSO 02: Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) Assessment of Liver Metastasis to Improve Surgical Planning (DREAM). Eur J Surg Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
19
|
Ciria R, Gomez-Luque I, Ocaña S, Cipriani F, Halls M, Briceño J, Okuda Y, Troisi R, Rotellar F, Soubrane O, Abu Hilal M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Updated Results from the European Guidelines Meeting on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery, Southampton, UK, 2017. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:252-263. [PMID: 30390167 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6926-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic approach to liver resection has experienced exponential growth in recent years; however, its application is still under debate and objective, evidence-based guidelines for its safe future progression are needed. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS To identify all the comparative manuscripts reporting on laparoscopic and open liver resection for HCC, all published English-language studies with more than 10 cases were screened. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, four specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, resections for solitary tumors, and those undergoing minor and major resections. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS From the initial 361 manuscripts, 28 were included in the meta-analysis. Five of these 28 manuscripts were specific to patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (321 cases), 11 focused on solitary tumors (1003 cases), 16 focused on minor resections (1286 cases), and 3 focused on major resections (164 cases). Three manuscripts compared 1079 cases but could not be assigned to any of the above subanalyses. In general terms, short-term outcomes were favorable when using a laparoscopic approach, especially in minor resections. The only advantage seen with an open approach was reduced operative time during major liver resections. No differences in long-term outcomes were observed between the approaches. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC is feasible and offers improved short-term outcomes, with comparable long-term outcomes as the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
| | - Irene Gomez-Luque
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Sira Ocaña
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark Halls
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Javier Briceño
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Yukihiro Okuda
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris 7, Clichy, AP-HP, France
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Van Daele E, Scuderi V, Pape E, Van de Putte D, Varin O, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Troisi R, Pattyn P. Long-term survival after multimodality therapy including surgery for metastatic esophageal cancer. Acta Chir Belg 2018; 118:227-232. [PMID: 29258384 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1411557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Esophageal cancer (EC) remains an aggressive disease with a poor survival. Management of metastatic EC is limited to palliative chemotherapy (CT). Scientific contributions regarding the role of surgery are scarce and controversial. We analysed outcome of surgically treated metastatic EC patients. METHODS We retrospectively identified surgically treated metastatic EC patients from our esophagectomy database. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical complications, pathological response, oncological outcome and mean survival of these aggressively treated stage IV cancer patients. RESULTS Twelve stage IV patients with disease presentation limited to outfield lymph node (LN) and/or liver metastasis were treated with an aggressive multimodality treatment including surgery. Mean age was 58 years (75% male, 75% Adenocarcinomas). Median postoperative hospital stay was 15 d. Radiological anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient. In hospital, mortality was nil. Complete resection was achieved in all but one. Metastatic recurrence occurred in 64% of R0 resected patients. At date of censoring, after a median follow-up of 22 months, 50% of the surgical resected patients are still alive and 33% are free of disease recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves show a possibility to long-term survival after aggressive multimodality therapy including surgery. CONCLUSIONS In selected metastatic EC patients, multimodality treatment including surgery has an acceptable surgical outcome with a potentially long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Van Daele
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vincenzo Scuderi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eva Pape
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van de Putte
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oswald Varin
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yves Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobilliairy Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dhondt E, Vanlangenhove P, Van Vlierberghe H, Troisi R, De Bruyne R, Huyck L, Defreyne L. Benign anastomotic biliary strictures untreatable by ERCP: a novel percutaneous balloon dilatation technique avoiding indwelling catheters. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:636-644. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5526-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
22
|
Caballero CA, Alvarez LC, Nilsson H, Ruers T, Senellart P, Rivoire M, Stattner S, Primavesi F, Troisi R, Gruenberger T, Heil J, Schnitzbauer A, Rahbari NN, Swijnenburg RJ, Malik HZ, Protic M, Neven A, Mauer ME, Poston GJ, Evrard S. EORTC-ESSO 1409 GITCG: A prospective colorectal liver metastasis database with an integrated quality assurance program (CLIMB). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.3558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Henrik Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Theo Ruers
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Stefan Stattner
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Dept. of General HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Jan Heil
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas Schnitzbauer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | - Mladjan Protic
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Anouk Neven
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
De Both A, De Man M, Troisi R, Van Vlierberghe H, Hoorens A, Geboes K. Treatment of a mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma with uptake on 68Gallium-DOTATOC positron emission tomography-computed tomography: A case report. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:547-552. [PMID: 28693204 PMCID: PMC5494723 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The case of a 35-year old female patient with a diagnosis of metastatic mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma (MAEC) is investigated in the present study. The patient was believed to have a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) with a high Ki-67 index and uptake on 68Gallium-DOTATOC positron emission tomography-computed tomography for 9 years, and was treated accordingly. The patient had long lasting disease control by treatment with sunitinib, and a response was observed in numerous lesions with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Following treatment for metastatic disease for >4 years, liver transplantation was performed, as an exception to normal recommendations, at the time of progression of a centrally located liver lesion inducing obstructive jaundice. Following transplantation, the diagnosis of a Grade 3 NET, as defined by the WHO 2010 classification, was challenged and changed to MAEC. MAEC is a rare type of tumor of the pancreas, exhibiting endocrine and acinar differentiation. It is difficult to diagnose, often being misidentified as acinar cell carcinoma or predominantly as neuroendocrine neoplasms. Immunohistochemical labelling provides the only evidence for the dual differentiation of neuroendocrine (synaptophysin and chromogranin) and acinar (lipase, trypsin and chymotrypsin) cell markers. Studies investigating MAECs with a clear histopathological diagnosis are scarce, in addition to evidence of disease behaviour and treatment options. It is generally agreed that surgery is the primary treatment in patients with resectable tumors. The responses to sunitinib and PRRT suggested that treatments considered or developed for NETs may be beneficial in MAEC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneleen De Both
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc De Man
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anne Hoorens
- Department of Anatomopathology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karen Geboes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lefere S, Hoorens A, Raevens S, Troisi R, Verhelst X, Van Vlierberghe H, Geerts A. Refractory subacute steatohepatitis after biliopancreatic diversion. Hepatology 2017; 66:289-291. [PMID: 28073162 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Lefere
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anne Hoorens
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sarah Raevens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Xavier Verhelst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anja Geerts
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Onghena L, Develtere W, Poppe C, Geerts A, Troisi R, Vanlander A, Berrevoet F, Rogiers X, Van Vlierberghe H, Verhelst X. Quality of life after liver transplantation: State of the art. World J Hepatol 2016; 8:749-756. [PMID: 27366301 PMCID: PMC4921796 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i18.749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) after deceased donor liver transplantation is increasingly recognized as a major outcome parameter. We reviewed recent publications in this rapidly evolving field in order to summarize recent achievements in the field and to define opportunities and perspectives for research and improvement of patient care. QoL does improve after liver transplantation according to a typical pattern. During the first year, there is a significant improvement in QoL. After one year, the improvement does stabilise and tends to decline slightly. In addition to the physical condition, different psychological parameters (such as depression, anxiety, sexual function) and sociodemographic elements (professional state, sex, marital state) seem to impact QoL. Opportunities for further research are the use of dedicated questionnaires and identification of influencing factors for QoL.
Collapse
|
26
|
Nadalin S, Capobianco I, Panaro F, Di Francesco F, Troisi R, Sainz-Barriga M, Muiesan P, Königsrainer A, Testa G. Living donor liver transplantation in Europe. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016; 5:159-75. [PMID: 27115011 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.10.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) sparked significant interest in Europe when the first reports of its success from USA and Asia were made public. Many transplant programs initiated LDLT and some of them especially in Germany and Belgium became a point of reference for many patients and important contributors to the advancement of the field. After the initial enthusiasm, most of the European programs stopped performing LDLT and today the overall European activity is concentrated in a few centers and the number of living donor liver transplants is only a single digit fraction of the overall number of liver transplants performed. In this paper we analyse the present European activities and highlight the European contribution to the advancement of the field of LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvio Nadalin
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Capobianco
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Fabrizio Di Francesco
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Roberto Troisi
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Mauricio Sainz-Barriga
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- 1 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany ; 2 Department of General and Liver Transplant Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; 3 Department of Paediatric Surgery and Transplantation Centre, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy ; 4 Department of General, Hepato-Biliary and Transplantation Surgery, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium ; 5 Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, CHU Tours University Hospital & Medical School Chambray-lès-Tours, France ; 6 Liver Surgery and Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; 7 Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chiche L, David A, Adam R, Oliverius MM, Klempnauer J, Vibert E, Colledan M, Lerut J, Mazzafero VV, Di-Sandro S, Laurent C, Scuderi V, Suc B, Troisi R, Bachelier P, Dumortier J, Gugenheim J, Mabrut JY, Gonzalez-Pinto I, Pruvot FR, Le-Treut YP, Navarro F, Ortiz-de-Urbina J, Salamé E, Spada M, Bioulac-Sage P. Liver transplantation for adenomatosis: European experience. Liver Transpl 2016; 22:516-26. [PMID: 26919265 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Revised: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to collect data from patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for adenomatosis; to analyze the symptoms, the characteristics of the disease, and the recipient outcomes; and to better define the role of LT in this rare indication. This retrospective multicenter study, based on data from the European Liver Transplant Registry, encompassed patients who underwent LT for adenomatosis between January 1, 1986, and July 15, 2013, in Europe. Patients with glycogen storage disease (GSD) type IA were not excluded. This study included 49 patients. Sixteen patients had GSD, and 7 had liver vascular abnormalities. The main indications for transplantation were either a suspicion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 15 patients) or a histologically proven HCC (16 patients), but only 17 had actual malignant transformation (MT) of adenomas. GSD status was similar for the 2 groups, except for age and the presence of HCC on explants (P = 0.030). Three patients with HCC on explant developed recurrence after transplantation. We obtained and studied the pathomolecular characteristics for 23 patients. In conclusion, LT should remain an extremely rare treatment for adenomatosis. Indications for transplantation primarily concern the MT of adenomas. The decision should rely on morphological data and histological evidence of MT. Additional indications should be discussed on a case-by-case basis. In this report, we propose a simplified approach to this decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Chiche
- Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Pancréatique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Maison du Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anaelle David
- Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Pancréatique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Maison du Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France
| | - René Adam
- ELTR and ELITA Board. www.eltr.org.,Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U785, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - M Martin Oliverius
- Transplant Surgery Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.,ELTR and ELITA Board. www.eltr.org
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Eric Vibert
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire, INSERM U785, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Jan Lerut
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - V Vincenzo Mazzafero
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Di-Sandro
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Christophe Laurent
- Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Pancréatique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Maison du Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vincenzo Scuderi
- Department of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Suc
- Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hôpital de Rangueil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Phillipe Bachelier
- Hôpital de Haute Pierre, Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jerôme Dumortier
- Service d'Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Centre de Transplantation Hépatique de l'Hôpital de l'Archet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nice, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Chirurgie Générale et Digestive et de la Transplantation Hépatique et Intestinale, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ignacio Gonzalez-Pinto
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Yves Patrice Le-Treut
- Chirurgie Générale et digestive, Hôpital de la Conception, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Francis Navarro
- Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jorge Ortiz-de-Urbina
- Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Chirurgie Hépato-Biliaire et Digestive, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Tours
| | - Marco Spada
- Instituto Mediterraneo Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Italy, Palermo, Italy
| | - Paulette Bioulac-Sage
- Service de Pathologie, INSERM U1053, Université Bordeaux Segalen, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ricciardi S, Van Wanzeele F, Troisi R. Infections and Immunosuppression as Specific Problems in a HIV + Patient Transplanted for End-Stage Alcoholic Cirrhosis. Acta Chir Belg 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2007.11680044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ricciardi
- Departments of General Surgery, Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent, Belgium
| | - F. Van Wanzeele
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - R. Troisi
- Departments of General Surgery, Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
de Rooij T, Besselink MG, Shamali A, Butturini G, Busch OR, Edwin B, Troisi R, Fernández-Cruz L, Dagher I, Bassi C, Abu Hilal M. Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:170-176. [PMID: 26902136 PMCID: PMC4814598 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive (MI) pancreatic surgery appears to be gaining popularity, but its implementation throughout Europe and the opinions regarding its use in pancreatic cancer patients are unknown. METHODS A 30-question survey was sent between June and December 2014 to pancreatic surgeons of the European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association and 5 European national pancreatic societies. Incomplete responses were excluded. RESULTS In total, 237 pancreatic surgeons responded. After excluding 34 incomplete responses, 203 responses from 27 European countries were included. 164 (81%) surgeons were employed at a university hospital, 184 (91%) performed advanced MI surgery and 148 (73%) performed MI distal pancreatectomy. MI pancreatoduodenectomy was performed by 42 (21%) surgeons, whereas 9 (4.4%) surgeons had performed more than 10 procedures. Robot-assisted MI pancreatic surgery was performed by 28 (14%) surgeons. 63 (31%) surgeons expected MI distal pancreatectomy for cancer to be inferior to open distal pancreatectomy concerning oncological outcomes. 151 (74%) surgeons expected to benefit from training in MI distal pancreatectomy and 149 (73%) were willing to participate in a randomized trial on this topic. CONCLUSIONS MI distal pancreatectomy is a common procedure, although its use for cancer is still disputed. MI pancreatoduodenectomy is still an uncommon procedure. Specific training and a randomized trial regarding MI pancreatic cancer surgery are welcomed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs de Rooij
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Correspondence Marc G. Besselink, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 20 5669111.
| | - Awad Shamali
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Interventional Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris-Sud University, Paris, France
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgery, Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom,Mohammad Abu Hilal, Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Coucke L, Snoeck E, De Maeseneer J, Haentjens I, Peersman W, Troisi R, Rogiers X. Knowledge and attitude of the Flemish primary care physician toward organ donation and transplantation. Transplant Proc 2015; 46:3127-33. [PMID: 25420842 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary care physicians (PCP) might play an important role in the acceptance of organ donation (OD) in the population. This would require both a positive attitude and a good basic knowledge about the organ donation and transplantation (ODT) process. Studies on this subject are very limited however. The objectives of this study are to determine the knowledge and attitude of the PCP towards OD in Flanders. METHODS Three-hundred twenty-seven Flemish PCPs completed an electronic questionnaire, comprising 6 sections: demographic factors, practical experience, knowledge, education, attitude and potential role in the ODT process. RESULTS Eighty-seven percent of the Flemish PCP agree with the implementation of heart-beating organ donation. Ninety-four percent would agree to donate the organs of their own child. 80% know that even without explicit consent the prelevation of the organs and tissues of each potential Belgian donor will take place. Although they are aware of the current legislation, their knowledge regarding donor criteria showed significant gaps. A minority of the PCP's know that donors can be little brain-dead children (53%) or elderly above 70 years (45%). Only 61% of PCPs know that brain dead is associated with irreversible damage to the brain and only 28% know that more than one physician is involved in making the diagnosis. A majority (91%) is willing to play a role in the ODT process. But about two-thirds (61%) of them doubt their ability to answer questions of patients on this subject. 82.5% of this group would find it useful to participate in a specific training. When they are offered different choices to play a role in the process, the most accepted (84%) one is informing the transplant centre about the donor's medical history and risk behavior. CONCLUSIONS The Flemish PCP has a positive attitude towards ODT. He is willing to play a role in the ODT process. However, our study clearly documents deficits in the knowledge about brain death and the need for postgraduate training in the field of ODT. Correcting these deficits may be an important factor in improving the acceptance of organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Coucke
- Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Snoeck
- Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - J De Maeseneer
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - I Haentjens
- Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - W Peersman
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - R Troisi
- Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium
| | - X Rogiers
- Department of Solid Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Reynvoet E, Van Cleven S, Van Overbeke I, Chiers K, De Baets P, Troisi R, Berrevoet F. The use of cyanoacrylate sealant as simple mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a large animal evaluation. Hernia 2015; 19:661-70. [DOI: 10.1007/s10029-015-1347-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
32
|
Carvalho LFAD, Scuderi V, Maes H, Cupo P, Geerts B, Van Bockstal M, Gremonprez F, Willaert W, Pattvn P, Troisi R, Ceelen W. Simultaneous Parenchyma-Preserving Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. Acta Chir Belg 2015; 115:385. [PMID: 27421666 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2015.11681136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
33
|
Colle I, Laureys G, Raevens S, Libbrecht L, Reyntjens K, Geerts A, Rogiers X, Troisi R, Hoehn H, Schindler D, Hanenberg H, De Wilde V, Van Vlierberghe H, Van Vlierberghe H. Living related liver transplantation in an adult patient with hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma 13 years after bone marrow transplantation for Fanconi anemia: A case report. Hepatol Res 2013; 43:991-8. [PMID: 23675868 PMCID: PMC3888060 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2012] [Revised: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 12/07/2012] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome due to defective DNA inter-strand cross-link repair. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative for pancytopenia, but may not prevent the development of non-hematological malignancies. We describe a 26-year-old male patient with FA and Marfan syndrome who in 1994 underwent successful HSCT with bone marrow stem cells from his human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sister. In 2006, three lesions in the liver were detected and resected. The three lesions all showed activation of the β-catenin pathway and were histologically characterized by a highly differentiated steatotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with remnants of the underlying adenoma from which it arose, a hepatocellular adenoma with foci of well-differentiated HCC, and a cholestatic adenoma. Risk factors for the emergence of HCC included FA itself, the use of androgens for a period of 3 years preceding HSCT and toxicity of the conditioning regimen. Because of the danger of developing additional HCC, liver transplantation was proposed, taking into consideration that immunosuppression would increase the risk of other malignancies. By using part of the liver of the sister, who already acted as bone marrow donor 13 years earlier, immunosuppression could be avoided. Liver transplantation was performed in 2007 without complication. Five years after liver transplantation the patient is doing well. This case is twofold special being the first case reporting FA co-occurring with Marfan syndrome and being the first reported case of FA treated for HCC by liver transplantation from a HLA-identical sibling donor without the use of immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Colle
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geneviève Laureys
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sarah Raevens
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Louis Libbrecht
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Reyntjens
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anja Geerts
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Xavier Rogiers
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent Belgium
| | - Roberto Troisi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent Belgium
| | - Holger Hoehn
- Institut für Humangenetik, Julius Maximillians Universität Würzburg, Germany
| | - Detlev Schindler
- Institut für Humangenetik, Julius Maximillians Universität Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Vincent De Wilde
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ St Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Deruytter E, Van Steenkiste C, Trépo E, Geerts A, Van Vlierberghe H, Berrevoet F, de Hemptinne B, Rogiers X, Troisi R, Colle I. Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: a retrospective analysis of recidivism, survival and risk factors predisposing to alcohol relapse. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2013; 76:282-290. [PMID: 24261021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second most common indication for liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the alcohol relapse rate and long-term survival after liver transplantation for ALD and to identify risk factors predisposing to alcohol relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2000 and 2007, 108 patients transplanted for ALD in the Ghent University Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. Relapse was defined as any drinking after transplantation, problem drinking as more than 2 units/day for women and 3 units/day for men. A wide range of variables was obtained from a questionnaire and medical records. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 55 months. Relapse was observed in 29%, 16% in problem drinking. The one- and five-year survival was 87% and 74% respectively. No significant difference in survival was found between non-relapsers, occasional drinkers and problem drinkers. The following risk factors were found to be significantly associated with relapse into problem drinking in an univariate analysis: a shorter pre-transplant abstinence period, the presence of a first degree relative with alcohol abuse and a higher number of prior attempts to quit. In multivariable analysis, the presence of a first degree relative with alcohol abuse was found associated with relapse into problem drinking. CONCLUSIONS The presence of a first degree relative with alcohol abuse is a valuable pre-transplant variable evaluating an ALD patient's eligibility for liver transplantation. Other variables are also helpful to outline the broader context of the drinking behavior of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Deruytter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Troisi R, Grotmol T, Jacobsen J, Tretli S, Toft-Sørensen H, Gissler M, Kaaja R, Potischman N, Ekbom A, N. Hoover R, Stephansson O. Perinatal characteristics and breast cancer risk in daughters: a Scandinavian population-based study. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2013; 4:35-41. [PMID: 24027626 PMCID: PMC3766926 DOI: 10.1017/s2040174412000645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The in utero origins of breast cancer are an increasing focus of research. However, the long time period between exposure and disease diagnosis, and the lack of standardized perinatal data collection makes this research challenging. We assessed perinatal factors, as proxies for in utero exposures, and breast cancer risk using pooled, population-based birth and cancer registry data. Birth registries provided information on perinatal exposures. Cases were females born in Norway, Sweden or Denmark who were subsequently diagnosed with primary, invasive breast cancer (n = 1419). Ten controls for each case were selected from the birth registries matched on country and birth year (n = 14,190). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional regression models. Breast cancer risk rose 7% (95% CI 2-13%) with every 500 g (roughly 1 s.d.) increase in birth weight and 7% for every 1 s.d. increase in birth length (95% CI 1-14%). The association with birth length was attenuated after adjustment for birth weight, while the increase in risk with birth weight remained with adjustment for birth length. Ponderal index and small- and large-for-gestational-age status were not better predictors of risk than either weight or length alone. Risk was not associated with maternal education or age, gestational duration, delivery type or birth order, or with several pregnancy complications, including preeclampsia. These data confirm the positive association between birth weight and breast cancer risk. Other pregnancy characteristics, including complications such as preeclampsia, do not appear to be involved in later breast carcinogenesis in young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Troisi
- Divisions of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - T. Grotmol
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - J. Jacobsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Tretli
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - H. Toft-Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M. Gissler
- Department of Information, THL National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - R. Kaaja
- Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - N. Potischman
- Divisions of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - A. Ekbom
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R. N. Hoover
- Divisions of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - O. Stephansson
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Berrevoet F, Vanlander A, Sainz-Barriga M, Rogiers X, Troisi R. Infected large pore meshes may be salvaged by topical negative pressure therapy. Hernia 2012; 17:67-73. [PMID: 22836918 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0969-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2011] [Accepted: 07/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure therapy for superficial and deep mesh infections after ventral and incisional hernia repair by a prospective monocentric observational study. METHODS During a 6-year period, 724 consecutive open ventral and incisional hernia repairs were performed. Pre- and intraoperative data as well as postoperative complications were prospectively recorded. In case of wound infection, negative pressure therapy (NPT) was our primary treatment. RESULTS Sixty-three patients (8.7 %) were treated using negative pressure therapy after primary ventral and incisional hernia repair. Infectious complications needing NPT occurred in 54 patients in the retromuscular group (54/523; 10.3 %), none when laparoscopically treated and in 9 patients (9/143; 6.3 %) treated by an open intraperitoneal mesh technique. Considering outcome, all meshes were completely salvaged in the retromuscular mesh group after a median of 5 dressing changes (range, 2-9), while in the intraperitoneal mesh, group 3 meshes needed complete (n = 2) or partial (n = 1) excision. Mean duration to complete wound closure was 44 days (range, 26-63 days). CONCLUSION NPT is a useful adjunct for salvage of deep infected meshes, particularly when large pore monofilament mesh is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Berrevoet
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185 2K12 IC, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current techniques for inguinal hernia repair show similar recurrence rates. Therefore, recurrence is no longer the main issue discussed when considering improving the current standards for groin hernia repair. Post surgical chronic pain represents a major, largely unrecognised clinical problem. Consequently, there is a need to not only decrease an extensive dissection in the inguinal canal with less manipulation of the inguinal nerves, but also to minimize the interaction between the mesh and major surrounding structures. As a result, placing the mesh in the preperitoneal space is a valuable option. OBJECTIVES To compare elective open preperitoneal mesh techniques with Lichtenstein mesh repair in terms of pain. SEARCH METHODS We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2011), EMBASE (1947 to October 2009), and ISI WEB OF KNOWLEDGE (1900 to April 2011) for randomized controlled trials. The reference list of identified trials, the World Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, and relevant book chapters were handsearched for useful trials. If we found relevant ongoing trials using national and international trials registers, we contacted the main investigators for further information. The language of the trials was not an exclusion criterion. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled studies comparing elective open preperitoneal mesh techniques with Lichtenstein mesh repair. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three authors independently extracted the pre-specified data and assessed the methodological quality using domain-based evaluation. Missing information was obtained by contacting the original investigators using open-ended questions. MAIN RESULTS Three eligible trials involving 569 patients were identified. Due to methodological limitations in the included studies, there was considerable variation in the results of acute (risk range 38.67% to 96.51%) and chronic pain (risk range 7.83% to 40.47%) across the control groups. Therefore, meta-analysis was not performed but the results of the outcomes in the individual trials were compared. Two trials involving 322 patients reported less chronic pain after preperitoneal repair (relative risk (RR) 0.18, number needed to treat (NNT) 8; RR 0.51, NNT 5), whereas one trial, including 247 patients, described more chronic pain after this repair (RR 1.17, NNT 77). The same trials favoured the preperitoneal technique concerning acute pain (RR 0.17, NNT 3; RR 0.78, NNT 7), whereas in the third trial it was almost omnipresent and thus comparable in both intervention arms (RR 0.997, NNT 333). Early and late hernia recurrence rates were similar across the studies, whereas contrasting results were reported for other early outcomes as infection and hematoma. No late mesh infection occurred in the included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Both techniques are valid as they result in similar low recurrence rates. Evaluation of pain results in the individual trials shows some evidence that preperitoneal repair causes less or comparable acute and chronic pain compared to the Lichtenstein procedure. We emphasize the need for homogeneous high quality randomized trials comparing elective preperitoneal inguinal hernia techniques and Lichtenstein repair in terms of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Willaert
- General & Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Hospital and Medical School Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
De Bruyne S, Van Damme N, Smeets P, Ferdinande L, Ceelen W, Mertens J, Van de Wiele C, Troisi R, Libbrecht L, Laurent S, Geboes K, Peeters M. Value of DCE-MRI and FDG-PET/CT in the prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer 2012; 106:1926-33. [PMID: 22596235 PMCID: PMC3388560 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for evaluation of response to chemotherapy and bevacizumab and for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with potentially resectable liver lesions. Methods: A total of 19 mCRC patients were treated with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI and bevacizumab followed by surgery. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT were performed before treatment and after cycle 5. PET results were quantified by calculating maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) whereas area under the enhancement curve (AUC), initial AUC (iAUC) and the endothelial transfer constant (Ktrans) were used to quantify DCE-MRI. Pathological analysis of the resection specimen was performed, including measurement of microvessel density (MVD) and proliferation index. Results: Both AUC and iAUC were significantly decreased following bevacizumab therapy (median change of 22% (P=0.002) and 40% (P=0.001) for AUC and iAUC, respectively). Progression-free survival benefit was shown for patients with >40% reduction in Ktrans (P=0.019). In the group of radiological responders, the median baseline SUVmax was 3.77 (IQR: 2.88–5.60) compared with 7.20 (IQR: 4.67–8.73) in nonresponders (P=0.021). A higher follow-up SUVmax was correlated with worse PFS (P=0.012). Median MVD was 10.9. Progression-free survival was significantly shorter in patients with an MVD greater than 10, compared with patients with lower MVD (10 months compared with 16 months, P=0.016). Conclusion: High relative decrease in Ktrans, low follow-up SUVmax and low MVD are favourable prognostic factors for mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab before surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S De Bruyne
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Reynvoet E, Berrevoet F, De Somer F, Vercauteren G, Vanoverbeke I, Chiers K, Troisi R. Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:2513-20. [PMID: 22476828 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2224-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2011] [Accepted: 02/17/2012] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In an attempt to improve patient outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, resorbable fixation devices have been developed to allow adequate mesh fixation while minimizing accompanying side-effects as tack erosion and adhesion formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS In experimental set-up, 24 pigs were treated by laparoscopic mesh placement. Two different meshes (PP/ORC and PP/ePTFE) and four fixation devices were evaluated: a 6.4 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide pushpin (tack I), a 6.8 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide with blunt tip (tack II), a 4.1 mm poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) (tack III) and one titanium tack (control tack). A first group of animals (n = 12) was euthanized after 2 weeks survival and a second group (n = 12) after 6 months. At euthanasia, a relaparoscopy was performed to assess adhesion formation followed by laparotomy with excision of the entire abdominal wall. Tensile strength of the individual fixation systems was tested with the use of a tensiometer by measuring the force to pull the tack out of the mesh. Additionally, the foreign body reaction to the fixation systems was evaluated histologically as was their potential degradation. RESULTS At 2 weeks the tensile strength was significantly higher for the control tack (31.98 N/cm²) compared to the resorbable devices. Except for tack II, the tensile strength was higher when the devices were fixed in a PP/ePTFE mesh compared to the PP/ORC mesh. After 6 months only tack III was completely resorbed, while tack I (9.292 N/cm²) had the lowest tensile strength. At this time-point similar tensile strength was observed for both tack II (29.56 N/cm²) and the control tack (27.77 N/cm²). Adhesions seem to be more depending on the type of mesh, in favor of PP/ePTFE. CONCLUSION At long term, the 4.1 mm poly(glycolide-co-L-lactide) tack was the only tack completely resorbed while the 6.8 mm poly(D,L: )-lactide tack with blunt tip reached equal strengths to the permanent tack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmelie Reynvoet
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, De Pintelaan 185, 2K12-IC, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dhondt E, Vanlangenhove P, van Vlierberghe H, Troisi R, Defreyne L. Abstract No. 224: Treatment of benign post-surgery biliary strictures with a 3-fold repeated percutaneous balloon dilatation regimen without long term indwelling catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.12.274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
41
|
Lambert B, Mertens J, Dhondt E, Seinstra B, Smits M, Colle I, van Vlierberghe H, Troisi R, Defreyne L. Abstract No. 199: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment with radiolabelled lipiodol embolization versus ytrrium-90 radioembolization: comparative survival analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.12.247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
42
|
Acharya G, Albrecht C, Benton SJ, Cotechini T, Dechend R, Dilworth MR, Duttaroy AK, Grotmol T, Heazell AE, Jansson T, Johnstone ED, Jones HN, Jones RL, Lager S, Laine K, Nagirnaja L, Nystad M, Powell T, Redman C, Sadovsky Y, Sibley C, Troisi R, Wadsack C, Westwood M, Lash GE. IFPA Meeting 2011 workshop report I: Placenta: Predicting future health; roles of lipids in the growth and development of feto-placental unit; placental nutrient sensing; placental research to solve clinical problems--a translational approach. Placenta 2011; 33 Suppl:S4-8. [PMID: 22154691 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2011] [Revised: 11/17/2011] [Accepted: 11/18/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Workshops are an important part of the IFPA annual meeting as they allow for discussion of specialized topics. At IFPA meeting 2011 there were twelve themed workshops, four of which are summarized in this report. These workshops related to both basic science and clinical research into placental growth and nutrient sensing and were divided into 1) placenta: predicting future health; 2) roles of lipids in the growth and development of feto-placental unit; 3) placental nutrient sensing; 4) placental research to solve clinical problems: a translational approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Acharya
- Women's Health & Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lambert B, Sturm E, Mertens J, Oltenfreiter R, Smeets P, Troisi R, Van Vlierberghe H, Defreyne L. Intra-arterial treatment with 90Y microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma: 4 years experience at the Ghent University Hospital. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 38:2117-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1881-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2011] [Accepted: 07/03/2011] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
44
|
Geerts A, Darius T, Chapelle T, Roeyen G, Francque S, Libbrecht L, Nevens F, Pirenne J, Troisi R. The multicenter Belgian survey on liver transplantation for hepatocellular failure after bariatric surgery. Transplant Proc 2011; 42:4395-8. [PMID: 21168706 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of obesity has grown dramatically over the last decades, with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increasingly observed. Therapeutic options for morbid obesity include bariatric surgery. Fatal liver failure (LF) has been recorded after jejunoileal bypass (JIB) but is controversial after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD, Scopinaro operation). We performed a survey on the frequency of liver transplantation (LT) after bariatric surgery in Belgium. An enquiry was sent to all Belgian liver transplant centers to investigate the occurrence of subacute and chronic LF after bariatric surgery. After weight-reduction surgery, 10 patients in 3 Belgian transplant centers were listed for LT due to severe hepatocellular failure. Nine of them had undergone a Scopinaro operation and 1 a jejunoileal bypass. The median time to develop LF was 5 years. The patient with JIB developed chronic LF after 25 years. Seven patients were transplanted; two died awaiting a graft and one is still on the waiting list. After LT, 1 patient developed rapid reappearance of LF at 10 months, requiring retransplantation. Two recipients died after LT because of multiorgan failure shortly after transplantation. In another case, a de novo cancer was fatal at 6 years' follow-up. The remaining recipients were doing well. According to this survey, the BPD operation carries a potential risk of LF. However, because there were only 10 cases, we remain unaware of the actual incidence of Scopinaro operation-induced LF. We advise strict follow-up of liver function and timely dismantling of BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Geerts
- Liver Transplant Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Scarinci A, Sainz-Barriga M, Berrevoet F, van den Bossche B, Colle I, Geerts A, Rogiers X, van Vlierberghe H, de Hemptinne B, Troisi R. Early arterial revascularization after hepatic artery thrombosis may avoid graft loss and improve outcomes in adult liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 42:4403-8. [PMID: 21168708 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) represents a devastating complication after liver transplantation (LT), occurring in 1.6%-9.2% of adult recipients. Treatments of HAT include thrombectomy and thrombolysis (with or without redo of the arterial anastomosis), percutaneous thrombolysis through an angiogram, liver retransplantation, and clinical observation. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 739 adult LTs between January 1992 and September 2009. HAT was classified as early (E-HAT), when occurring within the first 30 days after LT, or late HAT (L-HAT), when diagnosed from the 2nd month onward. HAT suspected clinically was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound and angiography in all cases. Attempted revascularization was defined as early (ER) if performed within the first 2 weeks after LT and late (LR) if performed between 15 and 30 days. RESULTS After a median follow-up (FU) of 62 months (range, 1-227 months), HAT occurred in 31/739 grafts (4.3%). E-HAT was recorded in 25/31 cases (3.4%) and L-HAT in 11/31 cases (0.8%). ER was performed in 20/31 patients (65%) leading to 62% graft salvage; it was 81% when the revascularization was performed within the first week after LT (P = ns). LR was unsuccessful in all cases (P = .08). The overall incidence of BC among rescued grafts was 54% without graft loss during FU. Graft survival was 79% versus 71%; and 50% versus 50% at 1 and 3 years for E-HAT and L-HAT, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS Urgent revascularization in cases of early HAT may decrease graft loss, especially when performed within the first week after LT, with improved overall outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Scarinci
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Speeckaert R, Van Vlierberghe H, Troisi R, De Bacquer D, Speeckaert MM, De Buyzere ML, Claeys L, de Hemptinne B, Delanghe JR. Donor haptoglobin phenotype determines outcome following liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2011; 24:619-26. [PMID: 21401731 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01246.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Haptoglobin (Hp) is a polymorphic plasma protein with multiple functions defined by three major phenotypes (Hp 1-1, Hp 2-1, and Hp 2-2). In this article, the effects of the donor Hp phenotype (determined by starch gel electrophoresis) on the outcome and the iron status after liver transplantation were investigated. A total of 450 liver transplant patients were enrolled in this study with a median follow-up of 37 months. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses showed a significantly worse graft survival for liver transplantation cases with an Hp 2-2 donor phenotype, which was associated with an increased mortality rate in this group. In male patients, the Hp 2-2 phenotype was associated with higher serum ferritin concentrations, which may be linked to the significantly increased likelihood of infectious complications in this phenotype. Liver transplant patients with Hp 1-1 and Hp 2-1 grafts had a better outcome probability than recipients of an Hp 2-2 graft, which may be explained by differences in iron metabolism induced by the Hp genotype of the graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhart Speeckaert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 85, Gent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Berrevoet F, D'Hont F, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B. Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3cm diameter. Am J Surg 2011; 201:85-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2009] [Revised: 01/19/2010] [Accepted: 01/19/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
48
|
|
49
|
Van Laecke S, Desideri F, Geerts A, Van Vlierberghe H, Berrevoet F, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B, Vanholder R, Colle I. Hypomagnesemia and the risk of new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2010; 16:1278-87. [PMID: 21031543 DOI: 10.1002/lt.22146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation and has a negative impact on both patient and graft survival. In analogy with the previous finding of an association between posttransplant hypomagnesemia and NODAT in renal transplant recipients, the relation between both pretransplant and posttransplant hypomagnesemia and NODAT was studied in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). One hundred sixty-nine adult LTRs (>18 years old) without diabetes who underwent transplantation between 2004 and 2009 were studied (mean age = 52.11 ± 12.6 years, proportion of LTRs who were male = 67.5%, body mass index = 25.5 ± 4.4 kg/m², proportion receiving tacrolimus = 90.0%). NODAT was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. The association of NODAT with both pretransplant and posttransplant serum magnesium (Mg) was examined. Overall, 52 of 169 patients (30.8%) developed NODAT, and 57.7% of these (30 patients) were treated with antidiabetic drugs. Both pretransplant Mg levels and Mg levels in the first month after transplantation were lower in patients developing NODAT (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001, respectively). A multivariate regression model (adjusted for weight, pretransplant glucose levels, hyperglycemia in the first week after transplantation, gender, hepatitis C, and corticosteroid dosing) demonstrated both pretransplant Mg levels (hazard ratio = 0.844 per 0.1 mg/dL increase, 95% confidence interval = 0.764-0.932, P = 0.001) and posttransplant Mg levels (hazard ratio = 0.659, 95% confidence interval = 0.518-0.838, P = 0.001) to be independent predictors of NODAT together with age, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the first year after transplantation. In conclusion, pretransplant hypomagnesemia and early posttransplant hypomagnesemia are independent predictors of new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation. Other risk factors are age, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and CMV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Van Laecke
- Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Berrevoet F, Maes L, De Baerdemaeker L, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B. Comparable results with 3-year follow-up for large-pore versus small-pore meshes in open incisional hernia repair. Surgery 2010; 148:969-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2009] [Accepted: 02/19/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|