Diagnostic performance of MRI and histology in assessment of deep lipomatous tumours

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Low local recurrence rates following marginal surgical resection of non-coelomic Atypical Lipomatous Tumours/Well-differentiated Liposarcomas

INTRODUCTION

High rates of local recurrence (LR) have been reported following resection of extremity Atypical lipomatous tumours/Well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALTs). This retrospective study of patients who underwent resection of primary deep extremity and trunk ALTs at a specialist sarcoma centre aims to assess morbidity and factors associated with low local recurrence rates (LRR).

METHODS

To review a homogeneous cohort of patients with low-grade disease, tumours with known high-risk histological features were excluded. Prognostic variables potentially influencing local recurrence (LR) (age, size, site, margin status, and histological findings) were analysed. Endpoints were LR, distant recurrence (DR) and local disease-free survival (LDFS).

RESULTS

127 patients were identified, with median follow-up of 54 months (0-235). Median tumour size was 17.5 cm (5-36). 85 % occurred in the lower limb. 93.7 % underwent marginal resection. No patients received radiotherapy. Median hospital stay was 3 days (0-16). 7.9 % returned to theatre for evacuation of haematoma or infected seroma and 18.1 % had outpatient seroma aspiration. Surgical margins were R0/R1 in 93.7 % of patients and R2 in 6.3 % with a LR rate of 8.4 % and 75 % respectively at median time of 54 months. One- and 5-year LDFS was 100 % and 88.4 %, respectively. DR rate was 0.8 % (1/127) this patient had pleomorphic liposarcomatous transformation on recurrence and subsequently developed distant metastases. No patients died of disease.

CONCLUSION

Function-preserving marginal resection of non-coelomic ALTs has low morbidity, low LR and extremely low rates of distant relapse. Patients with lower limb ALT were found to have significantly lower LR, which may impact follow-up protocols.

The Predictive Role of the Histopathological Scoring System in Adipose Tumors-Lipoma, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor, and Liposarcoma

Lipomatous tumors are the most frequent soft tissue neoplasms. Sometimes their differential diagnosis is difficult to perform only by microscopic analysis. This study aims to create a histopathological scoring system and highlight the impact of intratumoral microvascular density. This study was conducted over 10 years. We analyzed the main pathogenic pathways (MDM2 and CDK4), as well as the tumor microvascularization (CD31 and CD34) by immunohistochemical tests. We also analyzed the status of the MDM2 gene by CISH. These data, together with the clinical and histopathological information, were statistically analyzed by appropriate tests. We identified 112 eligible cases, with most of the patients being in their sixth decade of life, with a slight predominance of the female sex. We found important associations like tumor location linked to nuclear pleomorphism severity and microvascularization density correlated with atypia severity. Also, we observed that a maximum diameter of a tumor of at least 69 mm is associated with the presence of tumor necrosis. The score designed in this study shows an increased sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of lipomas (100%, respectively, 97%), atypical lipomatous tumors (93.8%, respectively, 82.3%), and liposarcomas (100%, respectively, 90.5%). This present study enhances the present data by bringing to attention the histopathological score with a role in differential diagnosis, as well as in the prediction of immunohistochemical and genetic tests. Also, we highlighted the importance of microvascular density, especially in the diagnosis of liposarcomas.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT and MR features for detecting atypical lipomatous tumors and malignant liposarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors and malignant liposarcomas from benign lipomatous lesions.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature from inception to January 2022 were systematically evaluated. Original studies with > 5 patients evaluating the accuracy of CT and/or MRI for detecting liposarcomas with a histopathological reference standard were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. Risk of bias was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42022306479.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with a total of 2613 patients were included. Mean/median reported patient ages ranged between 50 and 63 years. The summary sensitivity and specificity of radiologist gestalt for detecting liposarcomas was 85% (79-90% 95% CI) and 63% (52-72%), respectively. Deep depth to fascia, thickened septations, enhancing components, and lesion size (≥ 10 cm) all demonstrated sensitivities ≥ 85%. Other imaging characteristics including heterogenous/amorphous signal intensity, irregular tumor margin, and nodules present demonstrated lower sensitivities ranging from 43 to 65%. Inter-reader reliability for radiologist gestalt within studies ranged from fair to substantial (k = 0.23-0.7). Risk of bias was predominantly mixed for patient selection, low for index test and reference standard, and unclear for flow and timing.

CONCLUSION

Higher sensitivities for detecting liposarcomas were achieved with radiologist gestalt, deep depth to fascia, thickened septations, enhancing components, and large size. Combined clinical and imaging scoring and/or radiomics both show promise for optimal performance, though require further analysis with prospective study designs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This pooled analysis evaluates the accuracy of CT and MRI for detecting atypical lipomatous tumors and malignant liposarcomas. Radiologist gestalt, deep depth to fascia, thickened septations, enhancing components, and large size demonstrate the highest overall sensitivities.

KEY POINTS

• The summary sensitivity and specificity of radiologist gestalt for detecting liposarcomas was 85% (79-90% 95% CI) and 63% (52-72%), respectively. • Radiologist gestalt, deep depth to fascia, thickened septations, enhancing components, and large tumor size (≥ 10 cm) showed the highest sensitivities for detecting atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas and malignant liposarcomas. • A combined clinical and imaging scoring system and/or radiomics is likely to provide the best overall diagnostic accuracy, although currently proposed scoring systems and radiomic feature analysis require further study with prospective study designs.

The value of a new diagnostic strategy for adipocytic soft tissue tumors in adults: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The distinction between lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS), or "atypical lipomatous tumor" (ALT), is crucial as it impacts patient management. A group of European experts led by Benjamin Moulin recently issued a consensus report to define the role of radiology in managing these lesions. It describes an algorithm defining the criteria prompting a diagnostic biopsy of deep lipomatous tumors of the limbs and chest wall. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the algorithm's diagnostic performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2019, all biopsies of deep fatty tumors of the limbs or chest wall with a pre-biopsy MRI assessment were recorded at our institution. The MRI scans were reviewed by two radiologists. Each lesion was classified according to biopsy status by applying the algorithm of the European panel. The algorithm's diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Inter-rater agreement was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 156 tumors in our study, 148 (94.9%) required a biopsy, and the algorithm's sensitivity for detecting ALT/WDLPS was 100% with specificity of 6.3% and a PPV of 20.3%. Inter-rater agreement was almost perfect with a kappa value of 0.882.

CONCLUSION

The European algorithm demonstrates perfect sensitivity, an important criterion for a screening examination such as MRI in this setting. The algorithm's low specificity, however, emphasizes the need for further studies to redefine the optimum size cut-off value, especially for lesions without atypical criteria or an anatomical location at risk of post-surgical recurrence.

A case of liposarcoma with osteolysis of the maxilla as the first symptom and review of the literature

Liposarcomas are extremely rare in the oral cavity and mainly observed in the buccal mucosa, tongue, floor of the mouth, gingiva, and lips, while those occurring in the jaws have not been reported so far. Clinically, the initial presentation of liposarcoma is usually a painless soft tissue mass. The aim of this study was to report a case of liposarcoma with osteolysis of the maxilla as the first symptom, and review the relevant literature to summarize its clinical features, imaging features, pathological features and treatment methods.

Diagnosis strategy of adipocytic soft-tissue tumors in adults: a consensus from European experts

Fat-containing tumors are very commonly found in daily practice with benign lipoma accounting for the majority of superficial tumors. Overlap in imaging findings between benign and intermediate or malignant fat-containing tumor is common. Guidelines recommend a core needle biopsy (CNB) for all deep tumors, and superficial tumors over 3 cm. However, specific strategy for diagnosis and referral to a sarcoma center should be applied on adipocytic tumors. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a specific algorithm for adipocytic tumors, to discriminate patients who do require a CNB for preoperative diagnosis from those who can simply undergo active surveillance or a simple excision.

Overview of malignant soft-tissue sarcomas of the limbs

Although soft-tissue masses are common, sarcomas are rare malignant neoplasms showing variable mesenchymal differentiation and can occur at any anatomical site. Limb soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, but often lethal tumours. Although there are scores of historical pathological subtypes, this article will deal with the commonest: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), synovial sarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST), epithelioid sarcoma, alveolar rhabdosarcoma, angiosarcoma and radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS). Following a review of >4,000 adult patients with limb sarcoma from our specialist soft-tissue tumour database, we summarise the literature and their imaging findings, with emphasis on radiological hallmarks that can aide in diagnosis and management. Increased awareness of sarcoma when challenged with a new mass in the extremity can ensure timely and appropriate treatment.

The incidence and relevance of non-fatty components in trunk and extremity lipomatous soft tissue masses

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence and diagnostic relevance of non-fatty 'solid appearing' components within lipomatous tumours of the trunk and extremity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective review of patients referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology service over a 12-month period with a lipomatous trunk or extremity soft tissue tumour. The presence and morphology (solitary/multifocal; homogeneous/heterogeneous; well-defined/poorly defined) of non-fatty components was recorded based on MRI and compared with the final histological diagnosis.

RESULTS

213 patients with 217 lipomatous tumours were included, 119 (55.9%) males and 94 (44.1%) females with mean age of 54.6 years (range 7-93 years). Seventy-seven (35.5%) lesions arose superficial to the fascia and 139 (64.1%) deep, while a single case involved both compartments. Mean maximal tumour dimension was 94.9 mm (range 12-288 mm). Non-fatty 'solid appearing' components were identified in 28 (12.9%) cases, of which eight were solitary and 20 were multifocal, six had homogeneous SI and 22 had heterogeneous SI, and eight had well-defined margins, while 20 had poorly defined margins. Histological diagnosis was available in 20 of the tumours containing non-fatty components, 16 of which were benign, two intermediate grade and two malignant (a dedifferentiated liposarcoma and a myxoid liposarcoma). The commonest diagnosis was spindle cell lipoma, which accounted for 10 of 20 (50%) cases with confirmed histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-fatty components are identified in ~13% of trunk and extremity lipomatous tumours. The majority of such lesions are benign lipoma variants, most commonly spindle cell lipoma.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Solid non-fatty components are identified in approximately 13% of lipomatous tumours referred to a specialist sarcoma service. Despite the concern that these may represent dedifferentiated liposarcomas, high-grade tumours were seen in only two cases, the commonest diagnosis being a spindle cell lipoma.