Efficacy of Sphinkeeper™ implant in treating faecal incontinence

Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants in the Anal Canal for Gas Incontinence and Soiling: Long-Term Follow-Up

Introduction: Although several treatments for faecal incontinence are available, gas incontinence (GI) and soiling are difficult to manage. The aim of this study is to evaluate Gatekeeper™ for this subtype of faecal incontinence. Methods: Prospective single-centre case series. Patients with mainly soiling and/or GI were treated with polyacrylonitrile prostheses. An evaluation was performed with a 3-week continence diary. St. Mark's score and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to study the patient's continence perception and surgical satisfaction, at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound and Anorectal Manometry were performed at baseline and postoperatively. Results: A total of 13 patients were enrolled (11 women), aged (median (IQR)) 62 (13) years, and all implants were uneventful. A significant reduction in soiling and GI episodes was documented at 1 year, 7 (18) baseline days of soiling/3 weeks vs. 2 (4) (p = 0.002); 13 (13) baseline episodes of GI/3 weeks vs. 4 (10) (p = 0.01). This improvement was correlated with a significant increase in VAS (0-10), 3 (2, 5) baseline vs. 7 (1, 5) (p = 0.03), and maintained throughout the follow-up. There was complete remission or significant improvement defined as >70% reduction in gas and soiling days in 6 patients at 2 years follow-up. Soiling episodes were reduced ≥70% in 8/11 patients (72.7%). Nine (70%) patients would repeat the treatment. Conclusions: Gatekeeper™ is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for soiling and GI. A significant reduction in soiling and GI was observed in our series, with a better response to soiling. Most of the patients would repeat the treatment. Other studies are needed to confirm these findings in this subgroup of FI patients.

Faecal incontinence-a comprehensive review

Introduction

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a distressing and often stigmatizing condition characterised as the recurrent involuntary passage of liquid or solid faeces. The reported prevalence of FI exhibits considerable variation, ranging from 7 to 15% in the general population, with higher rates reported among older adults and women. This review explores the pathophysiology mechanisms, the diagnostic modalities and the efficiency of treatment options up to date.

Methods

A review of the literature was conducted to identify the pathophysiological pathways, investigation and treatment modalities.

Result and discussion

This review provides an in-depth exploration of the intricate physiological processes that maintain continence in humans. It then guides the reader through a detailed examination of diagnostic procedures and a thorough analysis of the available treatment choices, including their associated success rates. This review is an ideal resource for individuals with a general medical background and colorectal surgeons who lack specialized knowledge in pelvic floor disorders, as it offers a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of faecal incontinence (FI).

Endosonographic monitoring of Sphinkeeper® prostheses movements: does physical activity have an impact?

The Sphinkeeper® procedure for treating faecal incontinence (FI) may be associated with potential implant migration (IM) and dislocation (ID), with considerable variations regarding their occurrence and effects on consecutive functional outcome. This study assessed IM and ID following the Sphinkeeper® procedure and its correlation with physical activity. This was a prospective observational clinical study of ten patients undergoing Sphinkeeper® operation due to FI between August 2020 and November 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. Patients were followed-up after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Each follow-up visit included endosonographic monitoring of protheses location and manometric examinations. Additionally, functional outcome and physical activity were assessed using validated standardized questionnaires. The median number of prostheses implanted was 10 (IQR 9-10). The St. Mark's incontinence (SMS) score improved significantly until the last follow-up (p = 0.049), without observing a significant effect on the physical SF-12 score. The median rate of implants leading to IM and ID was 3 (range 1-4) and 2 (range 1-2) after 3 months of follow-up. A strong association of deltaSMS with number of dislocated prostheses at one month after Sphinkeeper® implantation was observed (r = 0.654, p = 0.078). Physical activity, assessed by the international physical activity questionnaire, did not have an impact on the correct prosthesis placement (1 month: p = 0.527; 2 months: p = 0.886; 3 months: p = 0.180; 6 months: p = 0.111). IM and ID of Sphinkeeper® prostheses occurred frequently early after surgery and affected functional outcome negatively. Physical activity did not have an influence on the implants displacement.

Long-term outcome after SphinKeeper® surgery for treating fecal incontinence-who are good candidates?

PURPOSE

The efficacy of the novel SphinKeeper® procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) is not yet well defined. This study aimed to assess long-term functional outcomes after SphinKeeper® surgery.

METHODS

We included 32 patients with FI (28 female), who were operated at a tertiary referral center between August 2018 and September 2021. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated prospectively using validated questionnaires before and after surgery. Additionally, endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry were conducted prior and after SphinKeeper® implantation. Predictive parameters for treatment success were defined.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 22.62 ± 8.82 months. The St. Mark's incontinence score decreased significantly after surgery (median preoperative = 19 (IQR 17-22) versus median last follow-up = 12 (IQR 8-16), p = 0.001). Similarly, physical short-form health survey showed a significant improvement after SphinKeeper® implantation (p = 0.011). Patients with a higher degree of internal sphincter defect showed an improved objective therapy success (r = 0.633, p = 0.015) after SphinKeeper® operation, whereas the type and severity of FI had no impact on the functional outcome. Notably, a higher number of dislocated prostheses (r = 0.772, p = 0.015) showed a significant correlation with reduced improvement of incontinence.

CONCLUSION

The SphinKeeper® procedure showed a significant long-term functional improvement in over half of the patients. Patients with a higher internal sphincter defect benefited most, whereas dislocation of the prostheses was associated with less favorable results.

Artificial sphincters: An overview from existing devices to novel technologies

Artificial sphincters (ASs) are used to replace the function of the biological sphincters in case of severe urinary and fecal incontinence (UI and FI), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The design of ASs is established on different mechanisms, e.g., magnetic forces or hydraulic pressure, with the final goal to achieve a implantable and durable AS. In clinical practice, the implantation of in-commerce AS is considered a reasonable solution, despite the sub-optimal clinical outcomes. The failure of these surgeries is due to the malfunction of the devices (between 46 and 51%) or the side effects on the biological tissues (more than 38%), such as infection and atrophy. Concentrating on this latter characteristic, particular attention has been given to the interaction between the biological tissues and AS, pointing out the closing mechanism around the duct and the effect on the tissues. To analyze this aspect, an overview of existing commercial/ready-on-market ASs for GERD, UI, and FI, together with the clinical outcomes available from the in-commerce AS, is given. Moreover, this invited review discusses ongoing developments and future research pathways for creating novel ASs. The application of engineering principles and design concepts to medicine enhances the quality of healthcare and improves patient outcomes. In this context, computational methods represent an innovative solution in the design of ASs, proving data on the occlusive force and pressure necessary to guarantee occlusion and avoid tissue damage, considering the coupling between different device sizes and individual variability.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of self-expandable implantable bulking agents for faecal incontinence: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate whether self-expandable implantable vs non-self-expandable injectable bulking agents (second-line therapies) are equal/superior in terms of effectiveness (severity, quality of life [QoL]) and safety (adverse events) for faecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, and five databases were searched (Medline via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology database). In-/exclusion criteria were predefined according to the PICOS scheme. The Institute of Health Economics risk of bias (RoB) tool assessed studies' internal validity. According to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the strength of evidence for safety outcomes was rated. A qualitative synthesis of the evidence was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The evidence consists of eight prospective single-arm, before-after studies (166 patients) fulfilling the inclusion criteria for assessing clinical effectiveness and safety of implantable bulking agents. FI severity statistically significantly improved in five of seven studies rated by the Cleveland Clinic FI Score and in three of five studies measured by the Vaizey score. Statistically significant improved disease-related QoL was found in one of five studies measured by the FI QoL Score and in one of two studies rated by the American Medical Systems score. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 16 of 166 patients (i.e., intraoperative complications, anal discomfort and pain). Device-related adverse events occurred in 48 of 166 patients, including prostheses' dislodgement and removed/extruded prostheses. Studies were judged with moderate/high RoB. The strength of evidence for safety was judged to be very low.

CONCLUSION

Implantable bulking agents might be an effective and safe minimally invasive option in FI treatment if conservative therapies fail. FI severity significantly improved, however, effects on QoL need to be explored in further studies. Due to the uncontrolled nature of the case series, comparative studies need to be awaited.

Design and evaluation of perception reconstruction with sensor system for artificial anal sphincter based on vector similarity

BACKGROUND

Artificial organs are playing an increasingly important role in medical field. Artificial anal sphincter, as an example, is a widely used medical device for fecal incontinence. Though it could help patients maintain continence, the issue of perception reconstruction is still unsolved, which means that patients cannot control defecation as desired.

METHODS

In this paper, a novel sensor system based on vector similarity has been analyzed and evaluated. The sensor system is a self-packaged strain gauge sensor with a small size 14.5mm x 6mm, especially for medical device implanted in body to reconstruct perception function. In order to overcome the disadvantages of single threshold judgment, a more accurate and reliable judgment standard for content pressure detection in rectum is developed by using vector similarity method. Therefore, in the novel sensor system, standard multi-parameters are comprehensive considered. Furthermore, weight-optimization of sensors are investigated since each sensor has played a different role in detection. Finally, sensor calibration, in vitro and in vivo experiments are established.

RESULTS

In sensor calibration, the result R² > 0.99 presents the strain gauge pressure sensor has a good linearity. After that, a series of in vitro experiments have been conducted. The optimized sensor system shows a high accuracy rate in perception reconstruction, which is 87.5% on early warning and 95% on the alarm. In the following in vivo experiments. The results indicate that the average accuracy of the proposed perception reconstruction module has increased by 17.7%, compared with that without optimized sensor system.

CONCLUSIONS

All of these have proven that the novel perception reconstruction module with sensor system based on vector similarity is more acceptable and reliable.

An evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of Gatekeeper™ intersphincteric implants for passive faecal incontinence

Background

Implantation of Gatekeeper™ prostheses presents an option for the treatment of passive faecal incontinence (FI). Whilst preliminary results are encouraging, long-term data regarding its sustained benefit are limited. The aim of this study was to assess and evaluate the long-term clinical function and quality of life of patients with passive faecal incontinence who were treated with Gatekeeper™ prostheses.

Methods

This was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective study of prospectively collected clinical data in patients with FI treated between June 2012 and May 2019. Patients with passive FI with symptoms refractory to conservative treatment and endoanal ultrasonography showing intact or disrupted internal anal sphincter were included. Formal clinical and quality of life assessments were carried out using the St. Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and then annually. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed both before and after surgery.

Results

Forty patients (14 males, 26 females) with a median age of 62.5 (range 33–80) years were treated with the Gatekeeper™ implant. The majority of patients (87.5%) received six implants. There were no peri or post-operative complications. Prosthesis migration was observed in 12.5% patients. The median follow-up duration was 5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 3.25–6.00 years). A sustained improvement in median SMIS and FIQoL scores from baseline to follow-up was noted. Significant differences were observed between the median baseline SMIS score and last follow-up score of 16.00 (IQR 15.00–16.75) to 7.00 (IQR 5.00–8.00) respectively (p < 0.001), a 56.25% decrease. The overall median FIQoL score showed a significant improvement from 7.95 (IQR 7.13–9.48) to 13.15 (IQR 12.00–13.98) (p < 0.001) a 65.40% increase.

Conclusions

Gatekeeper™ implantation is a safe approach to treating passive FI and is minimally invasive, reproducible and has minimal complications. Long-term sustained clinical improvement is achievable beyond 5 years. Careful patient selection is paramount, as is consistency of technique and follow-up protocol.

A prospective trial of the THD SphinKeeper® for faecal incontinence

AIM

THD SphinKeeper® is an emerging surgical technique for faecal incontinence (FI). The safety, indications and efficacy of the procedure are still being investigated. The aim of this study is to present the first experience of SphinKeeper® in Australia.

METHOD

This was a prospective single-centre observational study of patients undergoing SphinKeeper® implantation between February 2018 and September 2019. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence Score, St Mark's Incontinence Score, Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score (FIQOL), anorectal manometry and endo-anal ultrasound were assessed preoperatively and 3 and 12 months after implantation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (2 male, 11 female) underwent implantation during the study period. Anal sphincter defects were present in 13 (76.9%) patients [external anal sphincter (EAS) defect, 2 (15.4%); internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect 4 (30.8%); EAS + IAS defect, 4 (30.8%)]. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 18-37 months). There were four complications: one intraoperative (rectal perforation) and three postoperative (one implant extrusion, two implants that required removal due to malposition). At 12 months, an average of 9/10 implants remained ideally placed in each patient. THD SphinKeeper® insertion was associated with an improvement in coping/behaviour as measured using FIQOL (p = 0.047). However, the procedure did not improve FI scores or anorectal manometry parameters.

CONCLUSION

In this study, SphinKeeper® marginally improved symptoms of FI but there was no significant impact on anorectal manometric measurements. Larger-scale studies are needed to determine the patient cohort most likely to benefit from this procedure.

Preliminary study of a novel artificial anal sphincter with perception reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Artificial anal sphincter (AAS), as an advanced device, has been widely investigated by researchers around world. But the reliability of the structure is still unsatisfactory according to clinical results. What's more, the previous AAS systems are lack the ability of rectal perception as native anal sphincter, which fails to guarantee the safety of the blood supply. In addition, without it, the patient cannot determine when to defecate.

METHODS

In order to improve the reliability and safety of current AAS systems, a novel structure AAS system with rectal perception function, based on pressure sensor module, is proposed in this article. The novel AAS system has a closed three-arm clamping mechanism, with transmission structure of cam-follower system. Then, the design, strength check, optimization and force analysis of the proposed mechanism are investigated. After that, to remodel rectal perception function, the novel sensor module system based on strain gauge is established. Finally, in vitro experiments are conducted.

RESULTS

In vitro test, the sensor system could monitor the rectal pressure accurately. And when H = 24.6 cm (feeling the urge to have a bowel movement), the clamping pressure is 7.39 kPa. which is also less than the safe pressure 9.33 kPa.

CONCLUSIONS

Good performance of the reliability and safety of both novel rectal perception function and new clamping mechanism have been showed.

Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence in adults: is it possible to define what to do in different clinical scenarios?

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a complex often multifactorial functional disorder which is associated with a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. There is a broad spectrum of symptoms, and degrees of severity and diverse patient backgrounds. Several treatment algorithms from different professional societies and experts are available in the literature. However, no consensus has been reached on several aspects of FI management. We performed a critical review of the most recently published guidelines on FI, emphasising the lack of consensus, highlighting specific topics mentioned in each of the guidelines that are not covered in the others and defining the treatment proposed in different clinical scenarios.

Sphinkeeper Procedure for Treating Severe Faecal Incontinence-A Prospective Cohort Study

(1) Background: The Sphinkeeper implantation for faecal incontinence (FI) is a novel surgical procedure with limited data on its clinical efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the functional outcome following Sphinkeeper surgery in patients with refractory FI. (2) Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, eleven consecutive patients (9 female) with FI met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for surgery. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by standard questionnaires pre- and post-surgery. Migration of protheses was demonstrated by 3D endoanal ultrasound. The median follow-up time was eight months (range 3–18 months). (3) Results: The median age was 75 years (range 46–89 years) with a median BMI of 27.4 (range 21.2–30.1). The median number of implanted prostheses per intervention was nine (range 9–10). We found no intraoperative or early postoperative complications. After two months, two prostheses in one patient had to be removed due to pain at the perianal skin site. The median St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly from 22 to 13 points (p = 0.008). The SF-12 showed a significant improvement (35.9 versus 46.3) after surgery (p = 0.028). A migration of at least one prosthesis was observed in ten patients (91%). Six (60%) prostheses were found at the same level in another ten patients. (4) Conclusion: Sphinkeeper implantation is a promising surgical technique for patients with severe FI. The complication rate is low, and short-term functional improvement can be achieved even in severe forms of FI. Migration of implants commonly occurs.

Implant of Self-Expandable Artificial Anal Sphincter in Patients With Fecal Incontinence Improves External Anal Sphincter Contractility

BACKGROUND

External anal sphincter contractility significantly contributes to control the passage of stool. An artificial anal sphincter placed into the intersphincteric space is a safe and effective procedure to treat fecal incontinence, even if its mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate external anal sphincter contractility changes after a self-expandable hyexpan prostheses was implanted into the intersphincteric space of the anal canal and clinical outcomes compared.

DESIGN

This was a prospective clinical study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients affected by fecal incontinence for at least 6 months after failure of conservative treatment were included.

INTERVENTIONS

All of the patients underwent 10-prostheses implantation and were examined preoperatively and postoperatively by endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fecal incontinence symptoms were assessed by severity scores. The external anal sphincter muscle tension was calculated using a specific equation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (34 women; median age = 68 y) were included in the study; no morbidity was registered. After a median follow-up period of 14 months, both the median maximum voluntary squeeze pressure and the median inner radius of the external anal sphincter significantly increased. A statistically significant increase of external anal sphincter muscle tension was detected. A decrease of any fecal incontinence symptom and an improvement in severity scores were observed at the last follow-up examination. The external anal sphincter contractility was significantly higher in patients reducing incontinence episodes to solid stool by >50% and improving their ability to defer defecation for >15 minutes.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center experience with a relatively small and heterogeneous sample size, patients with a potentially more severe disease because our institution is a referral center, and an absence of quality-of-life evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Artificial anal sphincter implantation improved the external anal sphincter muscle tension; there was a positive correlation between its increase and the clinical outcome. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B468.

IMPLANTE DE ESFNTER ANAL ARTIFICIAL AUTOEXPANDIBLE EN PACIENTES CON INCONTINENCIA FECAL MEJORA LA CONTRACTILIDAD DEL ESFNTER ANAL EXTERNO

ANTECEDENTES:La contractilidad del esfínter anal externo contribuye significativamente al control del paso de las heces. Un esfínter anal artificial colocado en el espacio interesfinteriano es un procedimiento seguro y eficaz para tratar la incontinencia fecal, incluso si su mecanismo de acción no se ha definido por completo.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los cambios en la contractilidad del esfínter anal externo después de la implantación de una prótesis de hyexpan autoexpandible en el espacio interesfinteriano del canal anal y comparar los resultados clínicos.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se realizó en un hospital universitario.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos afectados por incontinencia fecal durante al menos 6 meses, tras fracaso de tratamiento conservador.INTERVENCIONES:Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a la implantación de 10 prótesis, y fueron examinados pre y postoperatoriamente mediante ecografía endoanal y manometría anorrectal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Los síntomas de incontinencia fecal se evaluaron mediante puntuaciones de gravedad. La tensión del músculo del esfínter anal externo se calculó mediante una formula específica.RESULTADOS:Treinta y nueve pacientes (34 mujeres; mediana de edad 68 años) fueron incluidos en el estudio; no se registró morbilidad. Después de un período de seguimiento medio de 14 meses, tanto la presión de compresión voluntaria máxima media como el radio interior medio del esfínter anal externo aumentaron significativamente. Se detectó un aumento estadísticamente significativo de la tensión del músculo del esfínter anal externo. En el último examen de seguimiento se observó una disminución de cualquier síntoma de incontinencia fecal y una mejora en las puntuaciones de gravedad. La contractilidad del esfínter anal externo fue significativamente mayor en los pacientes que redujeron los episodios de incontinencia a heces sólidas en más del 50% y mejoraron la capacidad para diferir la defecación durante más de 15 minutos.LIMITACIONES:Experiencia de un solo centro; tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño y heterogéneo; pacientes con una enfermedad potencialmente más grave porque nuestra institución es un centro de referencia; ausencia de evaluación de la calidad de vida.CONCLUSIONES:La implantación del esfínter anal artificial mejoró la tensión muscular del esfínter anal externo; hubo una correlación positiva entre su aumento y el resultado clínico. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B468.

Initial experience with SphinKeeper™ intersphincteric implants for faecal incontinence in the UK: a two-centre retrospective clinical audit

AIM

The SphinKeeper™ artificial bowel sphincter implant is a relatively new surgical technique for the treatment of refractory faecal incontinence. This study presents the first experience in two UK tertiary centres.

METHOD

This is a retrospective audit of prospectively collected clinical data in relation to technique, safety, feasibility and short-term effectiveness from patients undergoing surgery from January 2016 to April 2019. Baseline data, intra-operative and postoperative complications, symptoms [using St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS)] and radiological outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients [18 women, median age 57 years (range 27-87)] underwent SphinKeeper. In 30% of the patients, the firing device jammed and not all prostheses were delivered. There were no intra-operative complications and all patients were discharged the same or the following day. SMIS significantly improved from baseline [median -6 points (range -12 to +3); P < 0.00016] with 14/27 (51.9%) patients achieving a 50% reduction in the SMIS score. On postoperative imaging, a median of seven prostheses (range 0-10) were identified with a median of five (range 0-10) optimally placed. There was no relationship between number of well-sited prostheses on postoperative imaging and categorical success based on 50% reduction in SMIS (χ² test, P = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

SphinKeeper appears to be a safe procedure for faecal incontinence. Overall, about 50% patients achieved a meaningful improvement in symptoms. However, clinical benefit was unrelated to the rate of misplaced/migrated implants. This has implications for confidence in proof of mechanism and also the need for technical refinement.