Attenuation of adrenocortical response to upper abdominal surgery with epidural blockade

Perioperative benefit and outcome of thoracic epidural in esophageal surgery: a clinical review

Surgery for esophageal cancer is a highly stressful and painful procedure, and a significant amount of analgesics may be required to eliminate perioperative pain and blunt the stress response to surgery. Proper management of postoperative pain has invariably been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and accelerate recovery. Neuraxial analgesic techniques after major thoracic and upper abdominal surgery have long been established to reduce respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, inflammatory, and neurohormonal complications.The aim of this review is to evaluate and discuss the relevant clinical benefits and outcome, as well as the possibilities and limits of thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia (TEA) in the setting of esophageal resections. A comprehensive search of original articles was conducted investigating relevant literature on MEDLINE, Cochrane reviews, Google Scholar, PubMed, and EMBASE from 1985 to July2017. The relationship between TEA and important endpoints such as the quality of postoperative pain control, postoperative respiratory complications, surgical stress-induced immunosuppression, the overall postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and major outcomes has been explored and reported. TEA has proven to enable patients to mobilize faster, cooperate comfortably with respiratory physiotherapists and achieve satisfactory postoperative lung functions more rapidly. The superior analgesia provided by thoracic epidurals compared to that from parenteral opioids may decrease the incidence of ineffective cough, atelectasis and pulmonary infections, while the associated sympathetic block has been shown to enhance bowel blood flow, prevent reductions in gastric conduit perfusion, and reduce the duration of ileus. Epidural anesthesia/analgesia is still commonly used for major 'open' esophageal surgery, and the recognized advantages in this setting are soundly established, in particular as regards the early recovery from anesthesia, the quality of postoperative pain control, and the significantly shorter duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation. However, this technique requires specific technical skills for an optimal conduction and is not devoid of risks, complications, and failures.

Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal paralysis, nausea and vomiting and pain are major clinical problems following abdominal surgery. Anaesthetic and analgesic techniques that reduce pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), while preventing or reducing postoperative ileus, may reduce postoperative morbidity, duration of hospitalization and hospital costs. This review was first published in 2001 and was updated by new review authors in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To compare effects of postoperative epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics versus postoperative systemic or epidural opioids in terms of return of gastrointestinal transit, postoperative pain control, postoperative vomiting, incidence of anastomotic leak, length of hospital stay and costs after abdominal surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials by conducting computerized searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 12), MEDLINE (from 1950 to December 2014) and EMBASE (from 1974 to December 2014) and by checking the reference lists of trials retained. When we reran the search in February 2016, we added 16 potential new studies of interest to the list of 'Studies awaiting classification' and will incorporate these studies into formal review findings during the next review update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel randomized controlled trials comparing effects of postoperative epidural local anaesthetic versus regimens based on systemic or epidural opioids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We rated the quality of studies by using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. Two review authors independently extracted data and judged the quality of evidence according to the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) scale.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 128 trials with 8754 participants in the review, and 94 trials with 5846 participants in the analysis. Trials included in the review were funded as follows: charity (n = 19), departmental resources (n = 8), governmental sources (n = 15) and industry (in part or in total) (n = 15). The source of funding was not specified for the other studies.Results of 22 trials including 1138 participants show that an epidural containing a local anaesthetic will decrease the time required for return of gastrointestinal transit as measured by time to first flatus after an abdominal surgery (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.71 to -0.86; high quality of evidence; equivalent to 17.5 hours). The effect is proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used. A total of 28 trials including 1559 participants reported a decrease in time to first faeces (stool) (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.47; low quality of evidence; equivalent to 22 hours). Thirty-five trials including 2731 participants found that pain on movement at 24 hours after surgery was also reduced (SMD -0.89, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.70; moderate quality of evidence; equivalent to 2.5 on scale from 0 to 10). From findings of 22 trials including 1154 participants we did not find a difference in the incidence of vomiting within 24 hours (risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.23; low quality of evidence). From investigators in 17 trials including 848 participants we did not find a difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal anastomotic leak (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.32; low quality of evidence). Researchers in 30 trials including 2598 participants noted that epidural analgesia reduced length of hospital stay for an open surgery (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.04; very low quality of evidence; equivalent to one day). Data on costs were very limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

An epidural containing a local anaesthetic, with or without the addition of an opioid, accelerates the return of gastrointestinal transit (high quality of evidence). An epidural containing a local anaesthetic with an opioid decreases pain after abdominal surgery (moderate quality of evidence). We did not find a difference in the incidence of vomiting or anastomotic leak (low quality of evidence). For open surgery, an epidural containing a local anaesthetic would reduce the length of hospital stay (very low quality of evidence).

Spinal-general anaesthesia decreases neuroendocrine stress response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

A randomized clinical study to compare the stress response to laparoscopic cholecystectomy during spinal-general anaesthesia and epidural- general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Women undergoing elective laparoscopic chole cystectomy were assigned to receive either spinal anaesthesia (SA group; n = 12) or epidural anaesthesia (EA group; n = 12), in addition to general anaesthesia. Plasma concentrations of cortisol, adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), noradrenaline, adrenaline and total catecholamines were measured pre- and intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Intraoperative cortisol, noradrenaline and total catecholamine levels were significantly lower in the SA group compared with the EA group. When pre- and intraoperative values were compared, the SA group showed a decrease in adrenaline, noradrenaline and total catecholamine levels, and the EA group showed an increase in ACTH and noradrenaline levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of regional anaesthesia significantly affected the stress response: spinal anaesthesia produced a more favourable endocrine response than epidural anaesthesia. Spinal-general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative morbidity in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The Effects of Continuous Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia on Stress Response and Immune Function in Patients Undergoing Radical Esophagectomy

We investigated whether perioperative extensive epidural block (C3-L) affects postoperative immune response in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy. Patients undergoing radical esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either general anesthesia with continuous epidural infusion via 2 epidural catheters that was continued for postoperative analgesia (group E, n = 15) or intraoperative general anesthesia and postoperative IV morphine analgesia (group G, n = 15). Plasma levels of stress hormones, cytokines, C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte counts, and distribution of lymphocyte subsets were assessed before and after surgery and on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3. In comparison with group E, significant increases in plasma epinephrine level at the end of surgery (P < 0.05) and norepinephrine level at the end of surgery (P < 0.01) and on POD1 (P < 0.01) and POD3 (P < 0.01) and significant decrease in cluster of differentiation (CD4/CD8 ratio) at the end of surgery (P < 0.05) were observed in group G. However, there were no significant differences in other variables between groups. In both groups, plasma cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and CRP levels were increased after surgery (each group P < 0.01) and IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and CRP were still increased on POD1 and POD3 (each change, each group P < 0.01). Leukocyte counts were increased on POD1 (each group P < 0.05) and POD3 (each group P < 0.01). The proportion of lymphocytes decreased from the end of surgery to POD3 (each group P < 0.01). The proportion of B cells was increased on POD1 (each group P < 0.01); that of natural killer cells was decreased at POD1 and POD3 (each group P < 0.01). We conclude that tissue damage and inflammation apparently overcome the effects of extensive epidural block on stress response and immune function in radical esophagectomy.

Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials

OBJECTIVES

To obtain reliable estimates of the effects of neuraxial blockade with epidural or spinal anaesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality.

DESIGN

Systematic review of all trials with randomisation to intraoperative neuraxial blockade or not.

STUDIES

141 trials including 9559 patients for which data were available before 1 January 1997. Trials were eligible irrespective of their primary aims, concomitant use of general anaesthesia, publication status, or language. Trials were identified by extensive search methods, and substantial amounts of data were obtained or confirmed by correspondence with trialists.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All cause mortality, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, transfusion requirements, pneumonia, other infections, respiratory depression, and renal failure.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was reduced by about a third in patients allocated to neuraxial blockade (103 deaths/4871 patients versus 144/4688 patients, odds ratio=0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.90, P=0. 006). Neuraxial blockade reduced the odds of deep vein thrombosis by 44%, pulmonary embolism by 55%, transfusion requirements by 50%, pneumonia by 39%, and respiratory depression by 59% (all P<0.001). There were also reductions in myocardial infarction and renal failure. Although there was limited power to assess subgroup effects, the proportional reductions in mortality did not clearly differ by surgical group, type of blockade (epidural or spinal), or in those trials in which neuraxial blockade was combined with general anaesthesia compared with trials in which neuraxial blockade was used alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuraxial blockade reduces postoperative mortality and other serious complications. The size of some of these benefits remains uncertain, and further research is required to determine whether these effects are due solely to benefits of neuraxial blockade or partly to avoidance of general anaesthesia. Nevertheless, these findings support more widespread use of neuraxial blockade.

Stress responses in three different anesthetic techniques for carbon dioxide laparoscopic cholecystectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the stress hormone responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy during general anesthesia, general anesthesia supplemented by fentanyl, and general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

Operating rooms at a municipal hospital.

PATIENTS

52 ASA physical status I and II patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Anesthesia was induced slowly with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen (O2) by mask. Endotracheal intubation was facilitated with intravenous (i.v.) vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg. In 17 patients, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and 50% N2O in O2. For another 18 patients, fentanyl 4 micrograms/kg was administered after endotracheal intubation, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and 50% N2O in O2. The remaining 17 patients received thoracic epidural anesthesia (1% mepivacaine in an 8 ml bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 1% mepivacaine, 3 ml/hr) after endotracheal inturbation, and general anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and 50% N2O in O2. End-tidal sevoflurane concentrations were adjusted to maintain mean arterial pressure between 70% and 100% of preinduction values.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Venous blood was sampled for measurements of cortisol and catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine) immediately before and 30 minutes after surgical incision. Cortisol levels increased in all three anesthesia techniques. Both catecholamines increased in patients receiving general anesthesia only; catecholamines did not increase significantly in patients receiving general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia; in patients receiving general anesthesia supplemented with fentanyl, both catecholamines increased significantly, but the degree of increase in norepinephrine was less than that in the general anesthesia only group.

CONCLUSIONS

The fentanyl supplemented group received relatively small doses insufficient to inhibit an increase in catecholamines. Thoracic epidural anesthesia depressed the sympathetic response presumably by blocking afferent sympathetic pathways under the conditions of this study. However, it did not attenuate an increase in cortisol, one of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress hormones, during carbon dioxide laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our study. This action may be due to the inability of epidural anesthesia to block phrenic nerves that can convey noxious surgical stimulation to the central nervous system.

Surgical stress attenuates reflex heart rate response to hypotension

PURPOSE

The baroreflex-mediated increase in heart rate (HR) in response to acute reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was studied in order to assess whether the changes in arterial baroreflex sensitivity depend on the intensity of surgical stress, and location of visceral and somatic stimulation during surgery.

METHODS

Patients were divided into visceral stimulation groups [upper (n = 30) and lower (n = 30) abdominal surgery] and somatic stimulation groups [upper (n = 25) and lower (n = 25) limbs, and chest wall (n = 25) surgery]. Acute hypotension as a baroreflex depressor test was induced by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) 10 min before surgical incision (control) and during surgical manipulation under isoflurane-N2O anaesthesia or isoflurane-N2O-fentanyl anaesthesia. Plasma level of ACTH was measured in an additional 40 patients who underwent upper abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

During upper abdominal surgery, the heart rate baroreflex sensitivity (delta HR/delta SBP) was depressed from -0.47 +/- 0.05 (control) to -0.01 +/- 0.04 (P < 0.05). The reflex heart rate baroreflex sensitivity remained unchanged and was similar among the remaining groups of patients. The concentration of ACTH increased from 12.5 +/- 1.0 (control) to 343 +/- 78.6 pg.ml-1 (P < 0.05) with isoflurane-N2O anaesthesia but did not change with isoflurane-N2O-fentanyl anaesthesia during upper abdominal surgery.

CONCLUSION

Upper abdominal surgery is associated with the most stressful stimulation to attenuate heart rate baroreflex sensitivity. Integrity of the baroreflex can be preserved by adding opioids to supplement inhalation anaesthesia.

The role of the phrenic nerves in stress response in upper abdominal surgery

Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a block of the endocrine response to upper abdominal surgery by thoracic epidural analgesia. To clarify the bases for this failure, we compared the effects of epidural analgesia of different dermatome levels up to C8-T2 or C3-4. The patients who received general anesthesia alone showed significant increases of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) immediately after skin incision. The patients with C8-T2 blocked developed significant increases in these hormones, not after the skin incision, but after the intraabdominal procedure. Of the eight patients with C3-4 block, six developed no such responses throughout the study period. The responses of oxytocin (OXT) and prolactin (PRL) were more susceptible to epidural analgesia and were blocked at the C8-T2 level. Growth hormone (GH) showed no correlation with surgical procedures and epidural block. These findings indicate that the nociceptive neural information during upper abdominal surgery is conveyed by the sensory fibers included in both the thoracic and lumbar spinal nerves that innervate the abdominal wall and the intraabdominal viscera, and by the phrenic nerves that innervate the diaphragm. The rationale for postulating the involvement of the phrenic nerves can be referred to the embryonal descent of the diaphragm from the C3-5 myotomes that serves as the upper wall of the abdominal cavity.

Influence of intraperitoneal anesthesia on pain and the sympathoadrenal response to abdominal surgery

The effects of intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine on pain and the sympathoadrenal response to surgery were studied in a double-blind randomized trial in 19 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Bupivacaine (2 mg/kg) was dissolved in 300 ml isotonic saline and administered into the peritoneal cavity 10 min before the operation (n = 9). Saline was administered in a comparable group of patients (n = 10). There were no significant differences in pain scores between the groups during the first day after surgery (P greater than 0.05). Postoperative requirements of pethidine during the first 2 days after surgery did not differ significantly between the groups. Blood glucose levels were significantly lower in the bupivacaine-treated group 1 h (P less than 0.05) and 4 h (P less than 0.05) after skin incision. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding plasma catecholamine and serum cortisol levels during and after surgery. Differences between the groups regarding urine output of catecholamines during the first and second postoperative days were not significant. Our results suggest that single administration of a local anesthetic intraperitoneally does not reduce pain or the sympathoadrenal response to upper abdominal surgery.

Effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative insulin resistance as evaluated by insulin clamp technique

The influence of epidural neural blockade on postoperative insulin resistance was studied using the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique. Eighteen patients undergoing elective upper abdominal surgery of moderate severity were allocated to two groups: group G patients underwent operation under general anaesthesia, and postoperative pain was relieved by systemic administration of analgesia; and group E patients received epidural analgesia during surgery and epidural morphine postoperatively. In each patient the euglycaemic insulin clamp test was performed twice: several days before surgery and on postoperative day 1. Peroperative catecholamine and cortisol responses were also measured to investigate possible endocrine mechanisms of the insulin resistance. Glucose disposal (M) decreased in both groups on postoperative day 1 at plasma insulin concentrations ranging from 1.2 to 10.0 milliunits ml-1, resulting in the downward shift of dose-response curves. However, this downward shift was significantly smaller in group E than in group G patients. Urinary adrenaline excretion increased markedly on the day of operation in group G, but was significantly inhibited in group E. Urinary noradrenaline excretion increased mainly on postoperative day 1 in group G, but was significantly inhibited in group E. Plasma cortisol response was lower in group E than in group G during and shortly after operation, and was significantly inhibited in group E on postoperative day 1. These results indicate that insulin resistance after elective abdominal surgery is due to a postreceptor deficit in glucose utilization, as indicated by the downward shift of the dose-response curves. This disturbance in glucose metabolism was reduced by epidural analgesia, the results being associated with inhibited catecholamine and cortisol responses.

Effects of indomethacin on endocrine responses and nitrogen loss after surgery

In 14 patients who had elective gastrectomy, 50 mg of indomethacin was administered intrarectally every 6-8 hours after operation until postoperative day 3. Body temperature, plasma cortisol and glucagon concentrations, blood glucose level, urinary catecholamine level, and urinary nitrogen excretion level were compared with those of 16 patients who did not receive indomethacin. Postoperative fever was significantly reduced by indomethacin. Plasma cortisol levels in the indomethacin-treated group were significantly lower on postoperative days 2 and 3. Postoperative increases in plasma glucagon and blood glucose levels were not influenced by indomethacin administration. Urinary epinephrine excretion tended to be inhibited, and urinary norepinephrine excretion was significantly inhibited in the indomethacin-treated group after operation. Urinary nitrogen excretion levels during the observation period were significantly less in the indomethacin-treated group. The cumulative urinary nitrogen level from postoperative days 1-3 in the indomethacin-treated group was 82% of that in the control group. These results indicated that fever reduction by indomethacin after surgery resulted in reduced protein loss, associated with attenuated cortisol and catecholamine responses.

Stress and the pituitary-adrenal axis

The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis is controlled by complex regulatory mechanisms. Numerous factors such as CRF, vasopressin, oxytocin, angiotensin II and conceivably other hormones--all controlled by various substances acting on central locations--stimulate the release of the stress hormone ACTH. On the other hand, glucocorticoids inhibit the secretion of ACTH by acting at the hypothalamic and/or pituitary level. The release of ACTH is therefore the final outcome of the interactions between the hypothalamus, the adrenal gland and possibly other organs. The multimolecular nature of the factors responsible for the control of the pituitary-adrenal axis is an attractive hypothesis because of the great variety of stress stimuli. The various factors could have specific roles in various stress situations. They provide a highly sensitive mechanism regulating very finely the stress hormone in response to a whole variety of endogenous and exogenous stimuli. Depending on the type of stress, they may therefore singly or in combination affect the amount and duration of ACTH and steroid secretion. The released glucocorticoids may then produce their numerous effects on inflammatory and immunological processes, carbohydrate metabolism, shock and water balance. It has been postulated that these effects may be important in order to prevent host responses from over-reacting to stress and threatening homeostasis. However, proof of the necessity of the glucocorticoid hypersecretion in response to stress remains elusive.

Effects of epidural administration of local anaesthetics or morphine on postoperative nitrogen loss and catabolic hormones

To examine the effects of postoperative epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics or morphine on the excess nitrogen loss after upper abdominal surgery and to assess the roles of catabolic hormones in the nitrogen loss, urinary excretion of nitrogen and catecholamines and plasma concentrations of cortisol and glucagon were measured in three groups of patients undergoing elective gastrectomy. Group G patients received the operation under general anaesthesia, and their postoperative pain was relieved by intermittent injections of analgesics. Group PE received prolonged epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics during and after surgery. Group EM received epidural analgesia intra-operatively and epidural morphine postoperatively. Urinary nitrogen excretion during the first three postoperative days was significantly less in the PE and EM groups than in the G group, and the PE group excreted slightly less nitrogen than the EM group. In the G group, urinary excretion of adrenaline increased mainly on the day of operation, and noradrenaline chiefly on postoperative days. These catecholamine responses were almost completely abolished in the PE group, and significantly inhibited in the EM group. Plasma cortisol response was most remarkable shortly after the operation and then decreased in all groups, but was significantly lower in the two epidural groups than in the G group throughout the study. Plasma glucagon increased postoperatively in all groups, and the increase was less pronounced in both epidural groups than in the G group. These results suggested that an elevated sympathetic activity, represented by increased noradrenaline excretion and elicited by painful nociceptive and sympathetic nervous afferents, is responsible for the postoperative nitrogen loss which is mediated by glucagon and cortisol.

Role of the splanchnic nerves in endocrine and metabolic response to abdominal surgery

The splanchnic nerves are inevitably stimulated during upper abdominal surgery and this may produce various responses. To assess the role of splanchnic nerve stimulation on the endocrine-metabolic responses to abdominal surgery, intra-operative splanchnic nerve blockade was carried out in 12 patients undergoing elective gastrectomy under general anaesthesia and the results compared with those of patients undergoing gastrectomy under general anaesthesia or epidural analgesia alone. In the splanchnic blockade group, intra-operative increase in plasma cortisol, glucose, FFA (free fatty acids) and urinary adrenaline excretion were significantly less than that of the general anaesthesia group. This inhibitory effect of splanchnic blockade on these endocrine-metabolic responses was almost the same as, but slightly less remarkable than, that of high spinal epidural blockade. Urinary noradrenaline excretion reached the highest level on the first postoperative day in the general anaesthesia group. This noradrenaline response was significantly inhibited in the splanchnic group as well as in the epidural group. These results appeared to indicate that mechanical stimulation to the splanchnic nerve due to operative manipulation is largely responsible for the endocrine-metabolic responses in abdominal surgery. The results also suggested that, in addition to the splanchnic nerve stimulation, conscious pain perception is responsible for catecholamine release.

Influences of splanchnic nerve blockade on endocrine-metabolic responses to upper abdominal surgery

Twelve patients undergoing gastrectomy received combined epidural and splanchnic nerve blockade (Group E&S), and changes in plasma ACTH, cortisol, glucose and FFA were compared with those undergoing gastrectomy under general anaesthesia (Group G) or epidural analgesia alone (Group E). Plasma ACTH increased in all groups on the day of operation and was significantly higher in Group G than the other groups. Levels of ACTH in Group E&S were lower than Group E, but the differences were not significant. Cortisol response in Group G was most pronounced and prolonged. This cortisol response was significantly attenuated in Group E and was further inhibited in Group E&S. Blood glucose and FFA increased in Groups G and E during the operation but the increase was significantly less in Group E. In Group E&S, glucose and FFA concentrations showed practically no change throughout the study, being significantly lower than in Group E. The results indicated that the splanchnic nerve is responsible for producing endocrine-metabolic responses to gastric surgery even under epidural blockade.

Effect of epidural analgesia on metabolic response to major upper abdominal surgery

Blood concentrations of glucose, lactate, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and insulin (IRI) were measured in two groups of ten patients undergoing elective gastrectomy under general anesthesia with halothane (Group G) or epidural analgesia extending from Th3-4 to L1-2 without halothane (Group E). The rise in blood glucose and the rise in NEFA in group E during operation were significantly less than in Group G. Blood lactate levels during operation were lower in group E than in group G although the difference was not statistically significant. The increase in IRI/glucose ratio on postoperative day 1 was significantly less in Group E than in Group G, suggesting that insulin sensitivity after surgery was higher in Group E. The postoperative course was uneventful in all subjects. These results suggest that the endocrine-metabolic response to major upper abdominal surgery can be inhibited by epidural analgesia.