Effect of cimetidine on prognosis after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer

Surgery in the management of the gastric side-effects of NSAIDs

It is now accepted that the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can result in peptic ulceration. Not infrequently, the first presentation of the ulcer is as a life-threatening complication such as a perforation or gastrointestinal bleed. Surgeons often become involved in management when one of these complications occurs. This paper discusses the ways in which NSAID-induced peptic ulceration may present to the surgeon and the special features that distinguish patients with NSAID-induced ulcers from the remainder of patients with peptic ulcer disease. It is pointed out how little has been written on the surgical management of this group of patients. The importance of the overall assessment of these patients, with the correction of nutritional deficiencies and the use of appropriate prophylactic therapeutic measures in their surgical management, is stressed. The criteria for determining what surgical procedure is used and results are described.

Endoscope-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers

Laparoscopic repairs for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) are likely to fail in patients with shock, gastric outlet obstruction, or large perforations. This prospective study was performed to evaluate a revised approach of laparoscopic repair with endoscopic assistance to treat these patients. Between April 2001 and February 2002, 30 consecutive patients with PPU were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 43.1 ± 12.2 years. Male to female ratio was 27:2. One patient was excluded from laparoscopic repair due to a gastric outlet obstruction. The other 29 patients were managed according to a protocol of preoperative upper endoscopy and laparoscopic intracorporeal suture repair with an omental patch. The average operative time was 58.1 ± 13.5 minutes (range, 36–96 min). The average diameter of perforation was 4.2 ± 2.0 mm (range, 1–12 mm). The average time to resume oral fluids was 3.2 ± 0.8 days (range, 2–8 days). The average hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.1 days (range, 3–10 days). There was no leakage or mortality. Most patients did not receive parenteral analgesics postoperatively. We conclude that endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair for PPU is safe and effective. This revised technique allows surgeons to exclude patients who are likely to fail the laparoscopic repair.

Laparoscopic Omental Patch Repair for Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

A retrospective review was carried out on 33 consecutive patients with omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer; 13 had laparoscopic repair, and 20 had open repair. Laparoscopic repair was successful in 12 patients, with only one postoperative complication (8%). The morbidity rate for open repair was 15 per cent (3 of 20), and there was one postoperative death in the open group (5%). Overall, it did not take longer to perform the operation laparoscopically than the open method. Patients in the laparoscopic group required less postoperative analgesia (mean doses, 0.2 vs 0.9; P = 0.02). There was no difference in terms of hospital stay and resumption of diet after operation between the two groups. Laparoscopic omental patch repair offers a safe alternative to the open method in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer.

High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer perforations not caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

There has been controversy regarding the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and perforated peptic ulcer, which is known to have a high recurrence rate if only simple patch repair is performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between H. pylori infection and intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers. Of the 73 patients recruited over a 16-month period, 51 (70 per cent) had evidence of H. pylori infection by intraoperative gastroscopy and antral biopsies. The infection rate rose to 80 per cent if NSAID users were excluded. The H. pylori-infected group was significantly younger (mean 47.6 versus 62.5 years), with a male preponderance (49 of 51 versus 14 of 22 patients), and had significantly less NSAID consumption (three of 51 versus ten of 22) and more prolonged dyspepsia (40 of 51 versus ten of 22), compared with H. pylori-negative patients. H. pylori infection probably plays an important role in the causation of non-NSAID-induced duodenal ulcer perforation. Whether eradication of the bacteria can alleviate the strong ulcer diathesis in this subgroup of patients is unknown.

Changes in surgical strategies for peptic ulcers before and after the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists and endoscopic hemostasis

A total of 902 surgical patients with peptic ulcer disease were evaluated to clarify the effects of H2-receptor antagonists and endoscopic hemostasis on surgical treatment. Following the introduction of these treatments to our institute in 1982, the number of operations performed annually decreased by 40%, or 36 cases per year. However, a remarkable increase in the frequency of surgical emergency intervention since 1982 was concurrently observed, with the ratio of emergency procedures to the total number of operated cases increasing to 72.5% in the last 5 years of the study. Moreover, intractability as an indication for surgery decreased to 34.1%, compared with an increase in the number of patients with bleeding and perforated ulcers requiring operation. There were 13 postoperative deaths recorded (1.4%). All of the deaths were in patients who had undergone emergency surgery in poor health. Of these 13 patients, 10 had bleeding ulcers. A study of bleeding ulcers for which endoscopic hemostasis had been unsuccessful revealed that shock on admission and a concomitant medical condition had been evident in all the patients who died, and in 52.2% and 30.4% of the survivors, respectively. The current study suggests that the frequency of high-risk patients requiring surgery is increasing since the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists and endoscopic hemostasis, and thus, prompt surgical treatment and intensive management for such patients is essential.

Helicobacter pylori infection in perforated peptic ulcer disease

This study examined a possible aetiological agent, namely, Helicobacter pylori, in perforated peptic ulcer disease and its relationship to persisting ulcer. Twenty-nine patients with perforated peptic ulcer underwent simple closure of the perforation at laparotomy. A 13C urea breath test carried out on the eighth day after operation was positive in 24 patients. Fourteen of 17 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy 6 weeks after discharge from hospital had a positive 13C urea breath test. The biopsy urease test performed on mucosal samples taken at endoscopy was positive in 12 of these 14 patients, indicating continuing active infection with H. pylori. Seven patients with positive 13C urea breath and biopsy urease tests had persisting duodenal ulceration. None of the three patients with a negative 13C urea breath test had evidence of duodenal ulceration at endoscopy. The association between a high rate of duodenal ulcer persistence and a high incidence of H. pylori infection suggests that antibiotic therapy to eradicate this microorganism should be given to all patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer

OBJECTIVE

The authors' initial experience with laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer is documented. Its results are compared with those of other procedures and follow-up study is reviewed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Since the advent of H2-antagonists, the usefulness of simple closure of a perforated peptic ulcer is increasing, and improvements in laparoscopic surgery have made possible minimally invasive surgery for perforated ulcer.

METHODS

From December 1992 to February 1994, laparoscopic omental patch repair followed by use of H2-antagonists was performed successfully in 11 patients. Fifty-five patients underwent other surgical procedures for perforated peptic ulcers (conventional open omental patch: 4, selective vagotomy in combination with antrectomy: 24, distal gastrectomy: 27).

RESULTS

The average operation time was 135 minutes. Administration of postoperative pain medication was reduced remarkably (0.9 times per patient), and all patients recovered rapidly. No serious postoperative complications were recorded. After a mean period of 11 months, the postoperative evaluation was satisfactory for all patients, and no ulcer recurrence was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In perforated peptic ulcer disease, laparoscopic omental patch repair offers a number of advantages. Because no upper abdominal incision is made, there is decreased postoperative pain, and the patient rapidly recovers with fewer and less severe complications. Although the procedure requires a surgeon with particular expertise in endoscopic suturing technique, surgeons familiar with laparoscopic cholecystectomy can readily perform it after some practice. The authors' preliminary experience suggests that this is a minimally invasive procedure for perforated peptic ulcer that offers an attractive alternative to open surgery.

Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions

In an audit of 1190 emergency admissions with abdominal pain (1166 patients) in a general surgical unit, the diagnosis was non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) in 415 (35 per cent), acute appendicitis in 200 (17 per cent) and intestinal obstruction in 176 (15 per cent). The largest number of admissions occurred in the age groups 10-29 years (31 per cent) and 60-79 years (29 per cent). Surgical operations were performed in 551 patients (47 per cent) and there was a 16 per cent incidence of unnecessary appendicectomy (22 per cent in the age group 20-29 years). Fifty-one deaths resulted in a 30-day hospital mortality rate of 4.4 per cent and a perioperative mortality rate of 8 per cent. The mortality rate increased significantly in patients aged greater than or equal to 60 years, and patients aged 80-89 years had a perioperative mortality rate of 20 per cent. The causes of perioperative death included laparotomy for inoperable disease (28 per cent), ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (23 per cent), perforated peptic ulcer (16 per cent) and colonic resections (14 per cent). The perioperative mortality rates for ruptured aneurysm and perforated ulcer were 71 and 23 per cent respectively. The duration of inpatient stay increased significantly with the age of the patients, including those with NSAP. The results of the study indicate a need to review the methods of management of ruptured aortic aneurysm and perforated peptic ulcer, the methods of diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly in young females, and the factors that determine the duration of stay of patients suffering from NSAP.

A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer

To determine whether surgery could be avoided in some patients with perforated peptic ulcer, we conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome of nonoperative treatment with that of emergency surgery in patients with a clinical diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer. Of the 83 patients entered in the study over a 13-month period, 40 were randomly assigned to conservative treatment, which consisted of resuscitation with intravenous fluids, institution of nasogastric suction, and intravenous administration of antibiotics (cefuroxime, ampicillin, and metronidazole) and ranitidine. Eleven of these patients (28 percent) had no clinical improvement after 12 hours and required an operation. Two of the 11 had a perforated gastric carcinoma, and 1 had a perforated sigmoid carcinoma. The other 43 patients were assigned to immediate laparotomy and repair of the perforation. One of these patients was found to have a perforated gastric carcinoma. The overall mortality rates in the two groups were similar (two deaths in each, 5 percent), and did not differ significantly in the morbidity (infection, cardiac failure, or renal failure) rates (40 percent in the surgical group and 50 percent in the nonsurgical group). The hospital stay was 35 percent longer in the group treated conservatively. Patients over 70 years old were less likely to respond to conservative treatment than younger patients (P less than 0.05). We conclude that in patients with perforated peptic ulcer, an initial period of nonoperative treatment with careful observation may be safely allowed except in patients over 70 years old, and that the use of such an observation period can obviate the need for emergency surgery in more than 70 percent of patients.

Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: a case for risk stratification in elderly patients

In a consecutive series of 284 patients with a perforated peptic ulcer (229 pyloroduodenal, 55 gastric) there was a 26 per cent hospital mortality rate, and patients aged greater than or equal to 70 years (n = 176) had a significantly higher mortality rate (34 per cent) than patients aged less than 70 years (14 per cent, P less than 0.001). Multiple clinical variables were significantly more common in the elderly group of patients (65 per cent), in those having non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or steroid therapy (56 per cent), in patients where there is an absence of a previous dyspeptic history (69 per cent), and when risk factors such as delayed presentation (33 per cent) and the presence of shock on admission to hospital (27 per cent) are present. Definitive operations (vagotomy or gastrectomy) had an increased mortality rate in the elderly (P = 0.018). Risk scores based upon the presence of shock, delayed presentation or concurrent medical illness could have predicted 87 per cent of postoperative deaths in elderly subjects, and it is suggested that risk stratification and greater caution in the use of definitive operations for perforated ulcer may result in a reduction in the high mortality rate in elderly subjects.

Proximal gastric vagotomy. The preferred operation for perforations in acute duodenal ulcer

Simple closure, the conventional operation for perforated acute duodenal ulcers, is associated with symptomatic relapse in a large proportion of patients. In order to assess the role of immediate definitive surgery, 78 fit patients with perforated acute ulcers were prospectively randomized to undergo either closure alone or proximal gastric vagotomy with closure (PGV). Patients taking potentially ulcerogenic drugs or who had severe stress were excluded from the study. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, general medical health, duration of perforation, length of ulcer history, and presence of duodenal scarring. There was no hospital mortality. Minor complications occurred in 7.3% after closure and 10.8% after PGV. At 3 years follow-up, the cumulative recurrence rates were 36.6% and 10.6% after closure and PGV, respectively (p = 0.001). Eighty-five per cent of recurrences after closure were symptomatic, and half of them required reoperation. Duodenal scarring itself did not appear to influence the outcome after closure. PGV was not associated with dumping, diarrhea or other unwanted side effects. Although less than that in chronic ulcers, there is a substantial risk of symptomatic relapse after closure of perforated acute duodenal ulcers. With judicious patient selection, PGV effectively reduces this risk without incurring disabling side effects associated with other ulcer operations.

The task of a statistical referee

The results are presented of an audit of the statistical standard of papers published in The British Journal of Surgery. A number of deficiencies are highlighted, many of which stem from an over-emphasis on statistical significance at the expense of any assessment of the clinical relevance of research findings. The flaws in the design of published studies, and in particular the many instances of inadequate sample sizes, emphasize that statistical input should be sought at the beginning of a research project rather than at the end.