Intragastric bile acid and symptoms in patients with an intrathoracic stomach after oesophagectomy

Reflux Following Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Gastroesophageal reflux is a common problem after gastroesophageal resection and reconstruction, despite the routine prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Resection of the lower esophageal sphincter and excision of the vagus nerve are generally thought to be the main factors that interfere with gastric motor function. However, physiological studies of reflux symptoms after esophagectomy are still lacking. Gastroesophageal reflux occurs frequently after esophagectomy, but there is no known effective method to prevent it. Therefore, in order to manage gastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy, strict lifestyle modifications and gastric acid suppression treatment such as PPIs are needed, and further clinical studies are required.

A personal perspective on controversies in the surgical management of oesophageal cancer

Significant disagreement and debate persist regarding several aspects of the optimal surgical management of oesophageal cancer. We address some of these issues based on our consecutive series of 165 patients undergoing oesophageal resection (reported in full elsewhere) and the available literature. The areas considered are controversial but we argue in favour of a 'traditional' two-stage open approach (Ivor-Lewis), leaving the pylorus alone, making no attempt to perform a radical lymphadenectomy and fashioning a hand sewn anastomosis.

Surgical techniques to prevent delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric interposition: a systematic review

Delayed gastric emptying is observed in 10% to 50% of patients after esophagectomy with gastric interposition. The effects of gastric interposition diameter, pyloric drainage, reconstructive route, and anastomotic site on postoperative gastric emptying were systematically reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Most studies showed superior passage of the gastric tube compared with the whole stomach. Pyloric drainage is not significantly associated with the risk of developing delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy. For reconstructive route and anastomotic site, available evidence on delayed gastric emptying is limited. Prospectively randomized studies with standardized outcome measurements are recommended.

Should we continue to drain the pylorus in patients undergoing an esophagectomy?

A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the necessity of a pyloric drainage procedure during an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Earlier data recommend performing a pyloric drainage procedure for all esophagectomies; however, recent studies have questioned this. A thorough literature search (January 2001-November 2011) was performed using the terms esophagectomy, pyloroplasty, pyloromyotomy, botulinum toxin, and pyloric drainage. Only studies that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure with those undergoing an esophagectomy without a pyloric drainage procedure were selected. Only four studies, comprising 668 patients in total, were identified that compared patient outcome after undergoing an esophagectomy with or without a pyloric drainage procedure, and two additional meta-analyses were identified and selected for discussion. All studies were retrospective, and because of the heterogeneity of studies, patient demographics, reporting, and statistical analysis of patient outcome, pooling of data and meta-analysis could not be performed. Careful analysis demonstrated that pyloric drainage procedure was associated with a non-significant trend for delayed gastric emptying and biliary reflux, while not affecting the incidence of dumping. No correlation was determined between a pyloric drainage procedure and anastomotic leaks, postoperative pulmonary complications, length of hospital stay, and overall perioperative morbidity. While there are risks associated with a pyloric drainage procedure and data exist supporting its omission during an esophagectomy, no good conclusion can be drawn from the current literature. Larger multi-institutional, prospective studies are required to definitively answer this question.

The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review

Delayed emptying of the gastric conduit following esophagectomy can be associated with an increased incidence of complications including aspiration pneumonia and anastomotic leak. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the current modalities of pyloric drainage following esophagectomy and their impact on anastomotic integrity and postoperative morbidity. Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane library, trial registries, and conference proceedings were searched. Five pyloric management strategies following esophagectomy were evaluated: no intervention, botulinum toxin (botox) injection, finger fracture, pyloroplasty, and pyloromyotomy. Outcomes evaluated were hospital mortality, anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications, delayed gastric emptying, and the late complication of bile reflux. Twenty-five publications comprising 3172 patients were analyzed. Pooled analysis of six comparative studies published after 2000 revealed pyloric drainage to be associated with a nonsignificant trend toward a reduced incidence of anastomotic leak, pulmonary complications, and delayed gastric emptying. Overall, the current level of evidence regarding the merits of individual pyloric drainage strategies remains very poor. There is significant heterogeneity in the definitions of clinical outcomes, in particular delayed gastric emptying, which has prevented meaningful assessment and formulation of consensus regarding the management of the pylorus during esophagectomy. Pyloric drainage procedures showed a non-significant trend toward fewer anastomotic leaks, pulmonary complications, and reduced gastric stasis when employed following esophagectomy. However, the ideal technique remains unproven suggesting that further collaborative investigations are needed to determine the intervention that will maximize the potential benefits, if any, of pyloric intervention.

A flow visualization model of duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy with gastric interposition

Background

Our goal was to verify surgical factors that affect duodenogastric reflux (DGR) after esophagectomy through the use of a flow visualization model that would mimic an intrathoracic gastric tube.

Methods

Transparent gastric tube models for different routes (retrosternal space [RS] and posterior mediastinum [PM]) were fabricated. Various distal pressures were applied to the experimental model filled with water, and the flow was recorded with a high-speed camera. The volume and maximum height of the refluxate through the pylori of two different sizes (7.5 mm, 15 mm) in two different postures (upright, semi-Fowler) was measured by analyzing the video clips.

Results

For the large pylorus setting, when the pressures of 20, 30, and 40 mmHg were applied in the upright position, the volumes of the refluxate in the RS/PM tubes were 87.7 ± 1.1/96.4 ± 1.7 mL, 150.8 ± 1.1/158.0 ± 3.2 mL, and 156.8 ± 3.3/198.0 ± 4.7 mL (p < 0.05), and the maximum heights were 101.6 ± 4.8/113.4 ± 2.9 mm, 151.4 ± 2.2/165.4 ± 1.5 mm, and 166.1 ± 1.7/193.7 ± 6.6 mm (p < 0.05). The data for the small pylorus setting or in the semi-Fowler position showed similar tendencies. For any given route, posture or pressure setting, DGR in the large pylorus model was definitively higher than that for small one.

Conclusions

This fluid mechanics study demonstrates posterior mediastinal gastric interposition or pyloric drainage procedure, or both, is associated with high reflux of duodenal contents.

What influences the acidity in the gastric conduit in patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy for cancer?

The aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing acidity in the gastric conduit after esophagectomy for cancer. Acidity and bile reflux in the stomach and in the gastric conduit were examined by 24-h pH monitoring and bilimetry in 40 patients who underwent transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy followed by esophageal reconstruction using a gastric conduit, which was pulled up to the neck through a posterior mediastinal route in 17 patients, through a retrosternal route in 10 patients, and through a subcutaneous route in 13 patients. They were examined at 1 week before surgery, at 1 month after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery. Helicobacter pylori infection was examined pathologically and using the (13) C-urea breath test. The factors influencing acidity of the gastric conduit were analyzed using the stepwise regression model. Gastric acidity assessed by percentage (%) time of pH < 4 was reduced after surgery and was significantly less in patients with H. pylori infection compared with those without H. pylori infection throughout the period from 1 week before surgery to 1 year after surgery. Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) assessed by % time absorbance > 0.14 into the lower portion of the gastric conduit was significantly increased after surgery throughout the period from 1 month after surgery to 1 year after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the acidity in the gastric conduit was influenced by H. pylori infection and DGR at 1 month after surgery, and by H. pylori infection and the route for esophageal reconstruction at 1 year after surgery. Acidity in the gastric conduit was significantly decreased after surgery. Acidity in the gastric conduit for esophageal substitutes is influenced by H. pylori infection and surgery. DGR influences the gastric acidity in the short-term after surgery, but not in the long-term after surgery.

Functional disorders and quality of life after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer

Functional disorders such as delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome or duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux occur in half of the patients who undergo esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for cancer. The potential role for pyloroplasty in the prevention of functional disorders is still debated. Antireflux fundoplication during esophagectomy can apparently reduce the reflux but at the cost of increasing the complexity of the operation; it is not widely used. The treatment of functional disorders arising after esophagectomy and gastroplasty for cancer is based mainly on dietary measures. Proton pump inhibitors have well documented efficiency and should be given routinely to prevent reflux complications. Erythromycin may prevent delayed gastric emptying, but it should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders. In the event of anastomotic stricture, endoscopic dilatation is usually efficient. Problems related to gastrointestinal functional disorders after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction do not significantly impair long-term quality of life, which is mainly influenced by tumor recurrence.

The esophageal remnant after gastric interposition

Gastric interposition is usually considered the reconstruction of choice following esophageal resection. However, a number of reports show that esophagectomy followed by a gastric transplant is associated with poor quality of life and significant reflux esophagitis in the esophageal remnant. The aim of this work is to review the factors affecting the mucosa of the esophageal remnant when using the stomach. A Medline was conducted. Additional references and search pathways were sourced from the references of reviewed articles. Reflux disease is considered an unavoidable consequence of esophageal resection followed by gastric interposition. Mucosal damage from acid and bile exposure in the esophageal remnant affects approximatively 50% of these patients. There is usually no correlation between symptoms and the presence of mucosal damage in the remaining esophagus. Endoscopy and endoscopic biopsies are the only reliable methods to document the status of the mucosa. When present, reflux esophagitis shows a progression from inflammation to erosions and to the development of columnar lined metaplasia. Esophageal and gastric function, gastric drainage operation, level of the anastomosis, route of reconstruction, and patients' position after the operation have all been shown to influence the severity and extent of damage in the esophageal remnant. Prevention and treatment of esophagitis in the remaining esophagus are discussed. When the stomach is used as a substitute to reconstruct the esophagus whether for malignant or benign conditions, an in vivo model of reflux diseases is created. Studies using this model may help clarify molecular and cellular events that lead to irreversible insult on the esophageal mucosa. Improvement to the reconstruction itself must be sought to favor better results with the gastric transplant.

Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction

Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) is a common sequel of subtotal esophagectomy and gastric pull-up, and it may contribute to mucosal changes of both the gastric conduit and the esophageal remnant. This study investigated the effect of the route of reconstruction on the DGR. 24-hour ambulatory bilirubin monitoring was performed on patients who underwent transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy and a gastric tube interposition either in the posterior mediastinum (PM group, n = 11), or in the retrosternal space (RS group, n = 8): A Control group of 8 healthy volunteers was also studied. The median percentage of reflux time, the median number of reflux episodes, and the median number of reflux episodes longer than 5 minutes, in PM versus RS groups, were 29.1% versus 0.15% (p < 0.001), 185 versus 8 (p = 0.002) and 10 versus 0 (p = 0.001), respectively. The values of the above variables in PM versus control groups were 29.1% versus 3.95% (p = 0.007), 185 versus 21 (p = 0.02), and 10 versus 2 (p = 0.009), respectively, whereas in RS versus control groups they were 0.15% versus 3.95% (p = 0.01), 8 versus 21 (p = 0.04), and 0 versus 2 (p = 0.05), respectively. Posterior mediastinal gastric interposition is associated with high reflux of duodenal contents, whereas retrosternal interposition minimizes the reflux at levels even lower than those of the healthy individuals. The latter type of reconstruction may be a good alternative from that perspective, especially in patients with long life expectancy.

Acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Patients who undergo esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction incur increased risk for acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux. Few postesophagectomy studies of gastroesophageal reflux disease have included simultaneous 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring. The aim of this study is to evaluate acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

METHODS

Reflux symptom evaluation, endoscopy, and simultaneous 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring in the cervical esophagus were performed in 25 patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy, and digital dilation of the pyloric ring as treatment for esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

Reflux symptoms were severe, mild, and absent in 2, 7, and 16 patients, respectively. Reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus was observed in 11 and 1 patients, respectively. Elevated acid reflux occurred in 7 patients (28%). Elevated duodenogastroesophageal reflux was recorded in 11 patients (44%). Reflux profile analysis identified three patterns: 4 subjects (16%) with both elevated acid reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux; 3 (12%) with only elevated acid reflux; and 7 (28%) with only elevated duodenogastroesophageal reflux. Of 7 patients with only elevated duodenogastroesophageal reflux, 4 developed reflux esophagitis. Although reflux symptoms did not correlate with endoscopic esophagitis, a significant correlation was observed between endoscopic esophagitis and acid reflux and/or duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflux symptoms represented a poor indication of esophagitis in patients with esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. Simultaneous 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring can help in identifying patients at high risk for reflux esophagitis, as well as indicating the cause of esophagitis.

Reflux after oesophagectomy

Background

Reflux of gastric and duodenal content after oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction is a common problem and largely considered an inevitable consequence of surgery. Cervical burning and regurgitation, often more pronounced when supine, can be troublesome and even disabling, interfering substantially with quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to reflux after oesophagectomy and evaluate measures to prevent or control it.

Methods

A Medline search using the terms ‘gastro-oesophageal reflux’, ‘oesophagectomy’ and ‘antireflux surgery’ was conducted. Additional references and search pathways were sourced from the bibliographies of articles located.

Results and conclusion

Reflux after oesophagectomy is a significant problem, with both clinical and pathological consequences. Simple measures to facilitate gastric emptying, such as creating a gastric tube, performing a pyloric drainage procedure and using gastric motility agents, may produce a reduction in symptoms but do not alone control reflux itself. A variety of surgical reconstructions have been used, many of which are either difficult to fashion or not suitable when a radical resection has been performed. A modified fundoplication at the anastomosis seems to be the simplest technique and may be relatively effective in controlling symptoms. The impact of strategies to reduce reflux on quality of life and on pathological sequelae of reflux in the oesophageal remnant remains to be evaluated.

Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute

BACKGROUND

Both the supine position and the existence of a gastric drainage procedure are suspected to promote reflux of duodenal juice into the denervated intrathoracic stomach. Erythromycin has been shown to weaken pyloric resistance to gastric outflow and to enhance antral motility, gastric emptying, and gallbladder contractility.

METHODS

The presence of bile in the gastric transplant of 79 patients was monitored over a 24-hour period with use of the Bilitec 2000 optoelectronic device 3 to 195 months after subtotal esophagectomy. Ten patients were reinvestigated after a 3-year period. Five groups were studied: group I: n = 12, no gastric drainage, never given erythromycin, group 2: n = 40, gastric drainage, never given erythromycin, group 3: n = 7, no gastric drainage, given erythromycin, group 4: n = 13, gastric drainage, given erythromycin, and group 5: n = 7, no longer given erythromycin (with or without gastric drainage). The percentage of time gastric bile absorbance was more than 0.25 was calculated for the total, supine, and upright periods of recording in reference to data from 25 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

The Bilitec test was pathologic in 9 of the 12 patients of group 1 whereas it was normal in three. Gastric exposure to bile was longer in group I patients than in controls for the total (p = 0.012) and supine (0.036) periods, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for the upright period (p = 0.080). Bile exposure in group 4 did not significantly differ from controls (total: p = 0.701; supine: p = 0.124; upright: p = 0.712). Bile exposure for the total period did not significantly differ whether patients were taking erythromycin or the drug had been discontinued at the time of the study (p = 0.234); and it tended to decrease with time in patients investigated twice (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric exposure to bile after truncal vagotomy and transposition of the stomach up to the neck is pathologic in three quarters of patients. It is more marked in the supine than in the upright position and tends to decrease with time. The addition of a gastric drainage procedure in combination with erythromycin therapy tends to normalize gastric exposure to bile. The effects of erythromycin may persist after discontinuation of the drug.

Long-term effects of gastric transposition in children: a physiological study

Gastric transposition (GT) has become a reliable alternative operation for oesophageal replacement in children. The aims of this study were to assess the long-term results of the operation and to study the function of the intrathoracic stomach. Current symptoms were assessed using a questionnaire and linear analogue scales. Lung function was measured using spirometry and plethysmography, and the results were corrected for height and expressed as a percentage of the predicted values for normal children. Gastric emptying was assessed using a dual isotope radiolabelled test meal (incorporating solid and liquid phases). Full anthropometric and haematologic data also were collected. The results are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges. Seventeen children were examined at least 5 years after GT; the median age was 9 years. Two children frequently had symptoms during swallowing. Four children had significant diarrhoeal episodes, and two had significant postprandial weakness or dizziness. Unexplained breathlessness was noted by four children. All but one child had lung function values that were lower than the mean predicted value for height. For example, the total lung capacity was 68%, and forced vital capacity (FVC) was 64%. However, the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to FVC was normal. The gastric emptying study showed that the intrathoracic stomach in all subjects served as a conduit (rather than a reservoir) for both liquids and solids. Rapid emptying (> 50%) in both phases occurred within 5 minutes of ingestion in 82% of the group. Thirteen children were between the 3rd and 97th percentiles for height, and 11 in this range for weight. Five children were anaemic (< 11.5 g/dL). In 11 of the tested samples, the serum ferritin was low, indicating depleted iron stores. GT is compatible with an entirely normal life and has allowed satisfactory growth and nutrition for the majority of subjects in this study group.