Impact of fine-needle aspiration cytology, ultrasonography and mammography on open biopsy rate in patients with benign breast disease

Does fine-needle aspiration biopsy still have a place in the diagnosis of breast lesions?

Introduction

Core needle biopsy is a preferable breast biopsy technique under ultrasound guidance. However, fine-needle biopsy is considered equally popular.

Aim of the study

To redefine the role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analysed the medical records of 680 patients who underwent breast ultrasound examination. In most cases, no pathologic structures were observed within the mammary glands. In 321 patients, the presence of focal lesions was revealed, and 107 patients in this group qualified for FNAB according to current recommendations. Patients with suspicious smears were referred for core needle or surgical biopsy. Patients with benign cytological smears underwent repeated ultrasound checks at 6-month intervals during the following year.

Results

All the smears were diagnostic. The vast majority of the results were categorised as benign lesions. Cancer cells were detected in six women. In one patient the lesion was classified as suspicious, probably malignant. In all of these cases, open biopsy was performed, and histopathological examination confirmed the presence of a malignant tumour. The patients were given appropriate oncological treatment. For women with benign or suspicious, but probably benign, lesions, breast ultrasound was performed twice at six-month intervals. Control tests showed no significant changes compared to the baseline examination. None of the patients required extensive additional diagnostic tests.

Conclusions

FNAB is a reliable method of assessing pathologic lesions in mammary glands.

Preoperative cytological and histological diagnosis of breast lesions: A critical review

BACKGROUND

Non-operative pathology diagnoses constitute an essential part of the work-up of breast lesions. With fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) both having unique advantages, there is an increasing acceptance of CNB. This paper aims to outline the scientific basis of this trend. Additionally, we provide an update on novel techniques that derive cytological specimens from CNB (i.e., touch imprint (TI) and core wash (CW) cytology) in an attempt to get the best of both worlds.

METHODS

In addition to using the authors' experience, we performed a search of the Medline database combining the search terms "breast cancer diagnosis", "core needle biopsy", "fine needle aspiration", "touch imprint cytology", "core wash cytology" and "complications". We defined a conclusive non-operative diagnosis as "malignant" in lesions that were malignant on follow-up and "benign" in lesions that were benign on follow-up.

RESULTS

CNB was more often conclusive than FNA in benign and malignant lesions in 4 prospective studies. Although the more rapid diagnoses by FNA result in less patient anxiety during diagnostic work-up, CNB allows for fairly reliable estimation of invasion, histological type, grade, and receptor expression. CW and TI cytology seem promising techniques with conclusiveness rates that are roughly comparable to that of FNA.

CONCLUSIONS

All new suspicious breast lesions require careful non-operative investigation by CNB. However, additional cytological assessment by FNA can still be useful as a same-day diagnosis decreases patient anxiety and facilitates surgical treatment planning. TI and CW cytology techniques are promising same-day diagnosis modalities.

Is there a better way to assess performance in breast cytology?

Is there a better way to assess performance in breast cytology? Results generated from a series of breast fine needle aspirates (BrFNA) are semi-qualitative and therefore sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are not necessarily the best measures of effectiveness. This paper considers the likelihood ratio of cancer (LR+), which can provide the probabilities for cancer being present or absent for cancer across the range of diagnostic categories used in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP), i.e. C1 to C5. Using LR+, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves can be generated and used to compare performance between pathologists, laboratories or years. These are illustrated using test results from 1997 to 1999 for the Derbyshire Royal Infirmary. LR + and ROC are meaningful measures. They could replace the 12 calculations currently used for the evaluation of effectiveness of BrFNA in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) and for validation of pathologists' performance.

A prospective study of seeding of the skin after core biopsy of the breast

BACKGROUND

The number of core biopsies done for breast abnormalities is increasing. The risk of skin seeding resulting from core biopsy is unknown.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with breast cancer were studied. The skin and subcutaneous fat surrounding the site of core needle penetration were excised and studied by routine histologic staining. Findings were correlated with other clinical variables.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine consecutive patients were studied. Thirty-one had stereotactic core biopsies, 23 had vacuum-assisted biopsy, 8 had multiple-puncture biopsy, and 58 had ultrasound-guided core biopsy. Two patients who were biopsied using multiple-puncture biopsy were found to have nests of cancer cells in the dermis. One of these patients had recurrence in the skin biopsy site at 34 months.

CONCLUSION

Skin seeding may be important in light of increasing use of image-directed biopsy, and particularly for cases in which the biopsy puncture site is outside the index quadrant and in which no radiation is anticipated.

The value of ultrasound scanning in breast disease

Ultrasound is the modality of choice for imaging breast masses. Most benign and malignant lesions can be accurately categorized as a result of improvements in grey scale imaging and the development of sensitive colour Doppler vascular mapping. Ultrasound contrast agents, harmonic imaging, elasticity imaging and other advances will further enhance the utility of breast ultrasound.

Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Proliferative changes in breast epithelium are an intrinsic aspect in the development of breast cancer, and result in regions of epithelial electrical depolarisation within the breast parenchyma, which can extend to the skin surface. Diagnostic information might be obtained from a non-imaging and non-invasive test based on skin-surface electropotentials.

METHODS

In 661 women, scheduled for open biopsy at eight European centres, we studied whether measurements of breast electrical activity with surface sensors could distinguish benign from malignant breast disease. A depolarisation index was developed.

RESULTS

We found a highly significant trend of progressive electrical changes according to the proliferative characteristics of the biopsied tissue. Discriminatory information was obtained in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and the index was not related to age. The best test performances were for women with palpable lesions. The median index was 0.398 for non-proliferative benign lesions, 0.531 for proliferative benign lesions, and 0.644 for cancer (ductal carcinoma-in-situ and invasive). A specificity of 55% was obtained at 90% sensitivity for women with palpable lesions when a discriminant based on age and the depolarisation index was used.

INTERPRETATION

This new modality may have diagnostic value, especially in reducing the number of unnecessary diagnostic tests among women with inconclusive findings on physical examination. Understanding and control of the biological variability of these electrical phenomena will be important in the improvement of this test. Studies in populations with a lower cancer prevalence are needed to assess further the diagnostic value of this approach.

The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps

INTRODUCTION

Recent reports have suggested that breast ultrasound (US) is of value in distinguishing malignant from benign processes. The aim of this study was to establish the accuracy of US in detecting invasive malignancy in clinically benign, discrete, symptomatic breast lumps.

METHODS

The US appearances of 205 clinically benign breast masses were documented prospectively and prior to mammography by one radiologist (AJE). The US appearances were then correlated with the fine needle aspiration (FNA), core biopsy and surgical findings and compared with the mammographic findings.

RESULTS

The US findings were normal 72 (35%), simple cyst 63 (31%), solid benign 51 (25%), solid indeterminate 15 (7%) and solid malignant four (2%). Ultrasound characterized 13 (93%) of the 14 patients found to have invasive carcinoma as indeterminate or malignant. No patients with normal or simple cyst US findings had invasive malignancy. Ultrasound had significantly better accuracy (97% vs 87%, P < 0.02) sensitivity (93% vs 57%, P < 0.05) and negative predictive value (99% vs 92%, P < 0.002) than mammography in the detection of invasive carcinoma when indeterminate and malignant imaging findings were taken as positive.

CONCLUSION

US is a useful adjunct to FNA/core biopsy in confirming the nature of symptomatic, clinically benign breast masses and is superior to mammography in this clinical setting.