Knee-length versus thigh-length graduated compression stockings in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis

Anti-embolism stocking care protocol to prevent associated skin problems: A quasi-experimental study

AIM

The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to develop an anti-embolism stocking care protocol and assess its effectiveness in preventing associated skin problems on the legs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted between 02 March and July 20, 2016 in the surgical clinics of a private university hospital in Ankara, Turkey. The sample consisted of 27 nurses and 162 patients (three different patients were fitted of anti-embolism stockings by each of the 27 nurses; pre-protocol 81 patients and post-protocol 81 patients). Data were collected using data collection forms developed by the researchers. An anti-embolism stocking care protocol was developed and used. Nurses and patients were evaluated using an observational method.

RESULTS

Following implementation of the protocol, nurses' mean knowledge (95.24 ± 5.60) and intervention skill (92.06 ± 10.42) scores were significantly higher than their pre-protocol knowledge (73.54 ± 14.26) and intervention skill (15.30 ± 6.84) scores. Nurses performed almost all steps of the care protocol correctly after the protocol was implemented. The rates of skin problems such as pressure ulcers, neurovascular problems and issues associated with wrinkles or creases in stockings were significantly reduced after implementation of the protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that nurses' knowledge and intervention skills are increased when a care protocol is used, together with the prevention of errors and improved patient outcomes. The use of care protocols guides nurses in practice, raises awareness and helps to achieve nursing care objectives by standardizing information.

Systematic review of patient preference and adherence to the correct use of graduated compression stockings to prevent deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore patient preference and adherence to thigh and knee length graduated compression stockings for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND

Hospitalised patients are at risk of developing deep vein thrombosis. Mechanical methods of prophylaxis include compression stockings, available as knee or thigh length. Patient adherence to correct stocking use is of critical importance to their effectiveness.

DESIGN

Systematic review of quantitative evidence.

DATA SOURCES

Eleven databases were searched from inception to 2013 for systematic reviews of compression stockings. Reviews were screened for relevant primary studies and update searches of eight electronic sources were undertaken (2010-2014).

REVIEW METHODS

Randomised controlled trials and observational studies of surgical patients using compression stockings were quality assessed and data were extracted on patient adherence and preference. A narrative summary is presented.

RESULTS

Nine randomised controlled trials and seven observational studies were included in the systematic review. There was substantial variation between studies in terms of patient characteristics, interventions and methods of outcome assessment.

CONCLUSION

Patient adherence was generally higher with knee length than thigh length stockings. However, the studies reflect patient adherence in a hospital setting only, where patients are observed by healthcare professionals; it is likely that adherence reduces once patients have been discharged from hospital. Patients preferred knee length stockings over thigh length stockings. In many clinical settings, any difference in efficacy between thigh length and knee length stockings may be rendered irrelevant by patient preference for and likely better adherence to knee length stockings.

Graduated compression stockings for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients: a systematic review and economic model with a value of information analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) can occur in surgical patients. Routine prophylaxis can be pharmacological and/or mechanical [e.g. graduated compression stockings (GCSs)]. GCSs are available in knee length or thigh length.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the expected value of undertaking additional research addressing the relative effectiveness of thigh-length GCSs versus knee-length GCSs, in addition to pharmacoprophylaxis, for prevention of DVT in surgical patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review and economic model, including value of information (VOI) analysis.

REVIEW METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing thigh- or knee-length GCSs in surgical patients were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was incidence of DVT. DVT complications and GCSs adverse events were assessed. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. To draw on a wider evidence base, a random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was undertaken for the outcome DVT. A review of trials and observational studies of patient adherence was also conducted. A decision-analytic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of thigh- and knee-length GCSs and the VOI.

RESULTS

Twenty-three RCTs were included in the review of effectiveness. There was substantial variation between trials in terms of the patient characteristics, interventions and methods of outcome assessment. Five trials comparing knee-length with thigh-length GCSs with or without pharmacoprophylaxis were pooled; the summary estimate of effect indicated a non-significant trend favouring thigh-length GCSs [odds ratio (OR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 2.73]. Thirteen trials were included in the NMA. In the base-case analysis, thigh-length GCSs with pharmacoprophylaxis were more effective than knee-length GCSs with pharmacoprophylaxis (knee vs. thigh OR 1.76, 95% credible interval 0.82 to 3.53). Overall, thigh-length stockings with pharmacoprophylaxis was the most effective treatment, with a 0.73 probability of being the most effective treatment in a new trial of all the treatments. Patient adherence was generally higher with knee-length GCSs, and patients preferred knee-length GCSs. Thigh-length GCSs were found to be cost-effective in all but the subgroup with the lowest baseline risk, although the absolute differences in costs and effects were relatively small. The expected value of perfect information ranged from £0.2M to £178.0M depending on the scenario and subgroup. The relative effect parameters had the highest expected value of partial perfect information and ranged from £2.0M to £39.4M. The value of further research was most evident in the high-risk subgroups.

LIMITATIONS

There was substantial variation across the included trials in terms of patient and intervention characteristics. Many of the included trials were old and poorly reported, which reduces the reliability of the results of the review.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that the results from both the standard meta-analysis and the NMA lacked precision (CIs were wide) owing to the heterogeneous evidence base, a new definitive trial in high-risk patients may be warranted. However, the efficiency of any further research (i.e. whether this represents value for money) is dependent on several factors, including the acquisition price of GCSs, expected compliance with thigh-length GCSs wear, and whether or not uncertainty can be resolved around possible effect modifiers, as well as the feasibility and actual cost of undertaking the proposed research.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014007202.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis: Audit of Practice in General Surgical Patients in a Teaching Hospital

Objective:

To audit the prescription and implementation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in general surgical patients in a teaching hospital.

Methods:

All inpatients on three general surgical wards were audited for adequacy of prescription and implementation prophylaxis (audit A). A repeat audit 3 months later (audit B) closed the loop. The groups were compared using the chi-square test.

Results:

In audit A 50 patients participated. Prophylaxis was correctly prescribed in 36 (72%) and implemented in 30 (60%) patients. Eighteen patients at moderate or high risk (45%) received inadequate prophylaxis. Emergency admission, pre-operative stay and inadequate risk assignment were associated with poor implementation of protocol. In audit B 51 patients participated. Prescription was appropriate in 45 (88%) and implementation in 40 (78%) patients (p< 0.05). Eleven patients at moderate or high risk received inadequate prophylaxis. Seven of 11 high-risk patients in audit A (64%) received adequate prophylaxis, in contrast to all high-risk patients in audit B. The decision not to administer prophylaxis was deemed appropriate in 5 of 15 (30%) in audit A compared with 6 of 10 (60%) in audit B.

Conclusion:

Increased awareness, adequate risk assessment, updating of protocols and consistent reminders to staff and patients may improve implementation of DVT prophylaxis.

A randomised clinical trial comparing the patient comfort and efficacy of three different graduated compression stockings in the prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the comfort levels of patients regarding the use of three different graduated compression stockings and to analyse the efficacies of the graduated compression stockings in relation to patient comfort and compliance in prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND

Graduated compression stockings are very important with other prophylaxis methods in postoperative deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. In meta-analyses and systematic review studies, it was reported that knee-length and thigh-length graduated compression stockings had similar efficacies. However, there is no randomised study in literature regarding the patient problems and levels of comfort with the use of graduated compression stockings of different sizes and pressures.

DESIGN

A randomised clinical trial design.

METHODS

A total of 219 patients were randomised into three groups (n = 73 in each group). Group I was given low-pressure, knee-length graduated compression stockings, group II was given low-pressure, thigh-length graduated compression stockings and group III was given moderate-pressure, knee-length graduated compression stockings. The level of patients comfort regarding the graduated compression stockings and occurrence of deep vein thrombosis were examined.

RESULTS

The vast majority of the patients (79·5%) in group III and 52·1% of the patients in group II stated experiencing problems during the use of the graduated compression stockings (p < 0·001). The graduated compression stockings were reported by the patients as being very comfortable in the group I (p < 0·001). No findings of thrombosis were observed in any of the groups.

CONCLUSION

The low-pressure, knee-length graduated compression stockings are as effective as the other graduated compression stockings of different pressures and sizes in the postoperative deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and the patients have fewer problems while using these graduated compression stockings with a high satisfaction.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The combined use of pharmacological, mechanical and physical methods and patient education is effective in the prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis. The use of low-pressure, knee-length graduated compression stockings in clinical practice may be recommended, as the patients have fewer problems while using these graduated compression stockings with a high satisfaction.

Knee length versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Graduated compression stockings (GCS) are a valuable means of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised postoperative surgical patients. But it is still unclear whether knee length graduated compression stockings (KL) or thigh length (TL) stockings are more effective.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to systematically analyse the randomised, controlled trials that have evaluated the effectiveness of KL versus TL GCS as a thromboprophylaxis tool in hospitalised patients undergoing various types of surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched February 2012) and CENTRAL (2012, Issue 1). The authors searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (until 27 February 2012) and they also searched the reference lists of relevant articles to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials published in any language on KL versus TL GCS used as a thromboprophylaxis tool in hospitalised patients of any age and either gender.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction was undertaken independently by two review authors using data extraction sheets and confirmed by the third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies, with a combined total of 496 patients, matched the inclusion criteria for this review. All three included studies evaluated the role of KL and TL in thromboprophylaxis among a group of postoperative patients. These studies showed no significant difference in the ability of the two modalities of leg compression to reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative patients. In both the fixed-effect model (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 3.07, P = 0.21) and random-effects model (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.43 to 4.06, P = 0.63) KL graduated compression stockings were as effective as TL stockings in thromboprophylaxis. However, there was significant heterogeneity (Tau(2) = 0.50; Chi(2) = 4.12, df = 2 (P = 0.13); I(2) = 51%) among trials. Results of this review may be considered weak because there was significant heterogeneity among included trials resulting from inadequate randomisation techniques, allocation concealment, power calculations and the absence of intention-to-treat analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review found that there is insufficient high quality evidence to determine whether or not KL and TL GCS differ in their effectiveness in terms of reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalised patients.  A major multicentre RCT is required to address this issue. In the meantime, the decision on which type of stocking to use in clinical practice is likely to be influenced by factors such as patient compliance, ease of use and cost implications.

Randomized controlled trial of a new portable calf compression device (Venowave) for prevention of venous thrombosis in high-risk neurosurgical patients

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but often have contraindications for anticoagulant prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a new, lightweight, portable, battery-powered, intermittent calf compression device, Venowave, for the prevention of VTE in neurosurgical inpatients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed an open randomized controlled trial comparing Venowave with control for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing neurosurgery. The primary outcome was the composite of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected by screening venography or compression ultrasound performed on day 9 (± 2 days) and symptomatic VTE.

RESULTS

We randomized 75 patients to receive Venowave devices and 75 to the control group. All patients were prescribed graduated compression stockings and physiotherapy. VTE occurred in three patients randomized to Venowave and in 14 patients randomized to control (4.0% vs. 18.7%, relative risk 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.75, P = 0.008). Similar reductions were seen for proximal DVT (2.7% vs. 8.0%) and symptomatic VTE (0% vs. 2.7%), and the results were consistent in all subgroups examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Venowave devices are effective in preventing VTE in high-risk neurosurgical patients.

Use and wear of anti-embolism stockings: a clinical audit of surgical patients

The objective of this study was to determine if anti-embolism stockings are fitted and worn according to evidence-based guidelines in surgical patients. The methodology is that an observational study was undertaken during January and February, 2010. An audit tool was constructed for the recording of information on a variety of parameters relating to the correct fitting and wearing of anti-embolism stockings. The results show that eighty surgical patients were audited with a mean age of 66 years. Of these, 72.5% were ambulatory; 38.75% of patients had incorrect presentation of their stockings; 29% were fitted with the incorrect size for limb measurement and 70% of patients reported not receiving any information regarding the reason for anti-embolism stocking use. Written information was not received by 100% of participants. For 82.5% of participants deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk was not recorded. The garment size fitted (and/or limb measurement) was not recorded for 100% of patients. Daily routine skin inspection was noted for 29%. The findings of this study showed that anti-embolism stockings were not fitted and worn according to evidence-based guidelines. The author recommends a new recording tool be developed to ensure consistency of assessment and documentation regarding risk assessment, contraindications identification, and education and monitoring of patients wearing anti-embolism stockings.

Graduated compression stockings in hospitalized postoperative patients: correctness of usage and size

OBJECTIVE

Graduated compression stockings, when used correctly, have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of deep-vein thrombosis in surgical patients, but they can be harmful to skin and may even increase the risk of thrombosis if the wrong size is used. The authors sought to determine whether nurses correctly size and apply the stockings, whether problems were more common in knee- or thigh-length stockings, and whether nurses adequately educate patients on the usage of the stockings.

METHODS

The researchers used a comparative, descriptive design to study 142 hospitalized postoperative patients; 37 had thigh-length and 105 had knee-length stockings. They assessed usage of the stockings and compared four separate leg measurements against the manufacturer's sizing chart to determine whether stockings that had been applied were the correct size. They also asked patients to rate the comfort of the stockings and to describe their purpose.

RESULTS

The graduated compression stockings were used incorrectly (for example, they were wrinkled or the gusset was in the wrong place) in 29% of the patients and sized incorrectly in 26% of the patients. These problems were more common with the thigh-length stockings and in overweight patients. More patients who had thigh-length stockings found them uncomfortable than did those who had knee-length stockings, and 20% of patients didn't understand the stockings' purpose.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend that nurses ensure that graduated compression stockings are properly sized and used, that the education of both nurses and patients regarding the stockings be improved, and that knee-length stockings be the standard length used.

The use of antiembolic stockings. part 2: a clinical audit

AIM

To audit current practice regarding selection and use of graduated elastic compression stockings (GECS) in the authors' Trust. Following a literature review it was important for the Trust that the authors audited current practice before the development and implementation of any new guidelines.

BACKGROUND

A literature review enabled the authors to establish best practice principles for the use of GECS and develop guidelines for use across their Trust. However, feedback from various sources highlighted conflicting practices regarding the methods by which patients either did or did not receive stockings, and which lengths and brands were used. As the guidelines aimed to allow implementation of standardized change across the Trust, it was important to establish current practice with regard to GECS selection and use. Therefore, an audit tool was developed carried out on the use of GECS.

METHODS

An audit tool was developed and implemented to establish the practices before the implementation of the guidelines.

RESULTS

The audit demonstrated that there was no consistent policy within the surgical services directorate for the correct use of GECS.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that all healthcare providers have a local policy for GECS use, which makes it clear how an assessment for patients requiring GECS needs to be conducted and how that assessment is documented.

The Use of Knee-Length Versus Thigh-Length Compression Stockings and Sequential Compression Devices

BACKGROUND

Nurses on an Acute Care Evidence Based Practice Committee, creating a policy to increase patient compliance with thromboembolic deterrent stockings (TEDS) and sequential compression devices (SCDs) for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, found limited literature on patient preference and response to this treatment.

STUDY AIM

The study purpose was to determine whether knee-length or thigh-length TEDS and/or SCDs were more comfortable, correctly applied, and worn by patients, and to assess patient reasons for noncompliance.

METHOD

A patient survey and observational data tool was designed. Six surveyors collected data (interrater reliability = 93%) from 137 randomly selected patients with orders for TEDS and/or SCDs admitted to acute care medical or surgical nursing units.

RESULTS

Most patients wore thigh-length SCDs and TEDS. However, only 29.2% (n = 40) had SCDs on them at the time of survey, and 62.8% (n = 86) were compliant with TEDS. The most common reasons given for noncompliance with SCDs were that the devices were not reapplied after bathing or ambulating, or were removed because they were hot or itchy. Complaints of discomfort were highest among patients wearing thigh-length SCDs and TEDS. Problems with fit were 50% higher in those who wore thigh-length TEDS, and involved stockings that created restricting bands. Most patients understood the purpose of treatment, and older patients were more compliant than younger patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Knee-length TEDS and SCDs are more comfortable for patients, encourage higher levels of compliance with treatment, do not pose a risk for venous stasis to patients by creating restricting bands, and are less expensive. Patients need ongoing education to resume wearing TEDS and SCDs after activities of daily living, and knee-length stockings and devices would be easier to reapply. The policy in our institution was changed for the use of knee-length compression stockings and SCDs.

Knee versus Thigh Length Graduated Compression Stockings for Prevention of Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Graduated compression stockings are a valuable means of thrombo-prophylaxis but it is unclear whether knee-length (KL) or thigh length (TL) stockings are more effective. The aim of this review was to systematically analyse randomised controlled trials that have evaluated stocking length and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Clinical trials on hospitalised populations and passengers on long haul flights were selected according to specific criteria and analysed to generate summated data.

RESULTS

14 randomized control trials were analysed. Thirty six of 1568 (2.3%) participants randomised to KL stockings developed a deep venous thrombosis, compared with 79 of 1696 (5%) in the TL control/thigh length group. Substantial heterogeneity was observed amongst trials. KL stockings had a significant effect to reduce the incidence of DVT in long haul flight passengers, odds ration 0.08 (95%CI 0.03-0.22). In hospitalised patients KL stockings did not appear to be far worse than TL stockings, odds ratio 1.01 (95%CI 0.35-2.90). For combined passengers and patients, there was a benefit in favour of KL stockings, weighted odds ratio 0.45 (95% CI 0.30-0.68).

CONCLUSION

KL graduated stockings can be as effective as TL stockings for the prevention of DVT, whilst offering advantages in terms of patient compliance and cost.

Brief report: graduated compression stocking thromboprophylaxis for elderly inpatients: a propensity analysis

BACKGROUND

Graduated compression stockings (GCS) are often used for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in nonsurgical patients, although evidence on their effectiveness is lacking in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prophylaxis with GCS is associated with a decrease in the rate of deep vein thrombosis in nonsurgical elderly patients.

METHODS

Using original data from 2 multicenter nonrandomized studies, we performed multivariable and propensity score analyses to determine whether prophylaxis with GCS reduced the rate of deep vein thrombosis among 1,310 postacute care patients 65 years or older. The primary outcome was proximal deep vein thrombosis detected by routine compression ultrasonography performed by registered vascular physicians.

RESULTS

Proximal deep vein thrombosis was found in 5.7% (21/371) of the GCS users and in 5.2% (49/939) of the GCS nonusers (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.84). Although adjusting for propensity score eliminated all differences in baseline characteristics between users and nonusers, the OR for proximal deep vein thrombosis associated with GCS remained nonsignificant in propensity-stratified (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.59-2.10) and propensity-matched (conditional OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.42-2.02) analysis. Similar figures were observed for distal and any deep vein thrombosis. The rates of deep vein thrombosis did not differ according to the length of stockings.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with GCS is not associated with a lower rate of deep vein thrombosis in nonsurgical elderly patients in routine practice. Randomized studies are needed to assess the efficacy of GCS when properly used in this setting.

Compression Stockings and the Prevention of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism: Data From the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized and preventable complication of acute stroke. Although graduated compression stockings reduce the risk of VTE for patients undergoing operation, their benefit in acute stroke remains uncertain.

METHODS

The relationship between symptomatic VTE (sVTE) and use of stockings using observational data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial, which compared 10 days of treatment with tinzaparin (175 IU/kg(-1) or 100 IU/kg(-1)) with aspirin (300 mg), was assessed using logistic regression adjusted for known VTE risk factors and treatment.

RESULTS

sVTE Occurred in 28 patients (1.9%; 18 with deep vein thrombosis and 13 with pulmonary embolism) within 15 days of enrollment in 1479 patients. Patients wearing one or two stockings for any period of time during the first 10 days (n = 803) had a nonsignificant increase (odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 0.95-6.32) in the risk of sVTE. In contrast, those wearing bilateral stockings for 10 days (n = 374) had a nonsignificant reduction in the odds of sVTE as compared with those who wore no stockings or wore them for less than 10 days (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.26-1.65). Mild stroke and treatment with tinzaparin were associated with a reduced risk of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral graduated compression stockings may reduce the incidence of VTE by one third for patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, the uncertainty in this finding, low frequency of sVTE, potential for stockings to cause harm, and cost of stockings highlight the need for a large randomized controlled trial to examine the safety and efficacy of stockings in acute stroke.

Graduated compression stockings as prophylaxis for flight-related venous thrombosis: systematic literature review

AIM

This paper reports a systematic review whose objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of graduated compression stockings as prophylaxis for flight-related venous thrombosis, including deep vein thrombosis and superficial venous thrombosis, after air travel in the general population.

BACKGROUND

Despite the extended history of the use of graduated compression stockings, their application to prevent flight-related thrombosis was not explored until flight-related thrombosis was perceived as a preventable illness. Even now, their effectiveness in preventing flight-related thrombosis remains unresolved.

METHODS

Generic terms including stocking/s, sock/s, or hosiery/hosieries were used to search a variety of electronic databases. Based on the selection criteria, decisions regarding inclusion and exclusion of primary studies were made. Using a meta-analysis software program, relative risk for the incidence of deep vein thrombosis, superficial venous thrombosis, and intention-to-treat analysis was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of nine randomized controlled trials were included. In the treatment group, two of 1237 participants developed deep vein thrombosis in comparison with 46 of 1245 in the control group. The weighted relative risk for deep vein thrombosis was 0.08, with fixed 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.23. In the treatment group, four of 826 participants developed superficial venous thrombosis in comparison with seven of 823 in the control group. The weighted relative risk for superficial venous thrombosis was 0.67. with fixed 95% confidence interval 0.24-1.87 (non-significant difference). Using intention-to-treat analysis, the risk for participants in the treatment group was 0.53 times as great as that for those in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the effectiveness of medium compression pressure, below-knee graduated compression stockings in preventing flight-related deep vein thrombosis but not superficial venous thrombosis in low-medium- or high-risk participants.

A new anti-embolism stocking. Use of below-knee products and compliance

This article highlights the need to use graduated compression stockings (GCS) in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. A survey carried out at the Middlesex Hospital, part of the UCLH NHS Trust, London, ascertains the prevalence of patients wearing either above- or below-knee GCS and whether or not these were worn correctly through two trials. The findings show how the choice of product can influence compliance, safety and economy, which in turn influences adherence to hospital policy.

A review of thigh-length vs knee-length antiembolism stockings

Knee-length and thigh-length antiembolism (AE) stockings are used to prevent deep vein thrombosis in medical and surgical patients who are at risk because of periods of immobilization while in hospital. The aim of this review was to compare the effectiveness of both lengths of stocking and consider the implications for nursing practice. An electronic search was performed using Medline and Cinahl and a hand search was also conducted. Four studies and a literature review were selected. These studies indicated that knee-length AE stockings were equally effective as were associated with better patient compliance and were more cost-effective than thigh-length stockings. However, as with thigh-length stockings, they require accurate measurement and correct fitting if associated complications are to be avoided, highlighting the need for better education for both practitioners and patients.

Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis: the effectiveness and implications of using below-knee or thigh-length graduated compression stockings

Potential complications of reduced mobility in both acute and chronically ill patients continue to challenge nurses on a daily basis. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the most serious of these complications. Graduated compression stockings, also known as antiembolism stockings, are among the most commonly available and accepted methods of external compression for the prophylaxis of DVT. Currently, there are 2 lengths of graduated compression stockings in common use, thigh-length and below-knee. Although thigh-length stockings are widely perceived to be more effective in prophylaxis, difficulties associated with therapeutic application and maintenance are often encountered in different clinical settings. Below-knee stockings are easier to apply and maintain and appear to be tolerated better by patients. The aim of this article is to examine existing support for both lengths of stockings in terms of their effectiveness in DVT prophylaxis and to discuss the implications for practice.

Compression hosiery in the prevention and treatment of venous leg ulcers

Graduated compression therapy is the recognised gold standard for the treatment of venous ulcers, usually in the form of four-layer bandaging. Unfortunately with some patients the bulkiness of the bandages leads to non-compliance. An alternative to bandaging could be the use of below-knee graduated compression hosiery. This article will review the purpose and function of compression hosiery including details of patient assessment, measurement and compliance issues. It will provide the basic principles that should enable nurses to successfully treat patients with venous ulceration using compression hosiery.

Accurate selection of compression and antiembolic hosiery

The use of compression and antiembolic hosiery is widespread in hospital and community settings, but there is wide variation in almost every aspect of selection and prescribing practice. In some localities pharmacists or appliance officers are responsible for selecting a suitable stocking for patients, whereas in others it may be left to medical staff. Anecdotally, there is a lack of knowledge about when and what is safe to prescribe relative to the underlying disorder. This is compounded by discrepancy between the level of compression provided by stockings made according to the European method, and that prescribable under the UK Drug Tariff in primary care. This can result in clinically serious variation in what the patient is given and what his/her condition needs. A particular problem arises when the patient's care is continued following discharge from hospital. In this case not only may an inferior quality product be supplied (meeting the Drug Tariff specifications), but also the compression 'strength' can be unintentionally lower than expected or prescribed. A simple method of prescribing according to condition and pressure has been developed and is outlined here.

Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis: the effectiveness and implications of using below-knee or thigh-length graduated compression stockings

Potential complications of reduced mobility in both acute and chronically ill patients continue to challenge nurses on a daily basis. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the most serious of these complications. Graduated compression stockings, also known as antiembolism stockings, are among the most commonly available and accepted methods of external compression for the prophylaxis of DVT. Currently, there are 2 lengths of graduated compression stockings in common use, thigh-length and below-knee. Although thigh-length stockings are widely perceived to be more effective in prophylaxis, difficulties associated with therapeutic application and maintenance are often encountered in different clinical settings. Below-knee stockings are easier to apply and maintain and appear to be tolerated better by patients. The aim of this article is to examine existing support for both lengths of stockings in terms of their effectiveness in DVT prophylaxis and to discuss the implications for practice.

Graduated compression stockings in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Surveys still show a wide variation in routine use of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis despite its established place in current patient management. This article reviews the mechanism of action, efficacy and complications of stockings in preventing DVT.

METHODS

Relevant publications indexed in Medline (1966-1998) and the Cochrane database were identified. Appropriate articles identified from the reference lists of the above searches were also selected and reviewed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Graduated compression stockings reduce the overall cross-sectional area of the limb, increase the linear velocity of venous flow, reduce venous wall distension and improve valvular function. Fifteen randomized controlled trials of graduated compression stockings alone were reviewed. Stockings reduced the relative risk of DVT by 64 per cent in general surgical patients and 57 per cent following total hip replacement. The effect of stockings was enhanced by combination with pharmacological agents such as heparin; the combination is recommended in patients at moderate or high risk of DVT. Knee-length stockings are as effective and should replace above-knee stockings. Complications are rare and avoidable.