Potential clinical implications of direction of a trans-sphincteric anal fistula track

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in defining dentate line in anal fistula

Purpose

To retrospectively assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in defining dentate line in anal fistula.

Materials and methods

Seventy patients with anal fistulas were assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The distance from the dentate line to the anal verge for all patients was measured by MRI. To mitigate interference, 35 patients with anal fistulas whose internal openings were located on the dentate line were excluded from this study. Two observers independently judged the positional relationship between the internal opening and the MRI-defined dentate line, and compared with the results observed by surgeon to assess the accuracy.

Results

The distance between the MRI-defined dentate line and the anal verge depended on the location of the internal opening and the morphology of the anal canal mucosa. The distance based on the location the internal opening and the morphology of the anal canal mucosa was 18.2 ± 8.1 mm and 20.0 ± 5.3 mm on oblique coronal T2WI, respectively. Compared with the results observed by the surgeon, the accuracy of evaluating the positional relationship between the internal opening and the dentate line from the morphology of the anal canal mucosa on MRI exceeded 89.9%. Taking 18.2–20.0 mm as the distance between the dentate line and the anal verge on the MRI image, the accuracy of evaluating the relationship between the position of the internal opening and the dentate line was over 85.7%. Considering both the dentate line and the anal canal mucosa, the accuracy of evaluating the relationship between the internal opening and the dentate line was over 91.5%. The results of MRI-defined dentate line were in good agreement with the results of intraoperative surgeon evaluation, and the κ values were 0.70, 0.63, and 0.78, respectively.

Conclusion

MRI has high accuracy in defining the dentate line in anal fistulas.

Getting the most out of MRI in perianal fistula: update on surgical techniques and radiological features that define surgical options

Perianal fistulas affect approximately 2 in 10,000 people, causing symptoms such as pain and discharge, which can have a debilitating effect on a patient's quality of life. Surgical treatment, which can offer a potential cure or palliation of symptoms, must be considered carefully in cases with extensive sphincter involvement. In complex cases, the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help to determine the best course of operative action. This review describes common and contemporary surgical procedures for perianal fistula, highlighting technical features, as well as important surgical considerations associated with each method and how these can be assessed radiologically. We focus on the anatomical features and MRI findings that take procedural elements into account and help determine the most appropriate method of treatment. The aim of this article is to provide a basis for informed and focused discussion between surgeons and radiologists to ensure the most appropriate procedure is selected for each case, with the ultimate aim of obtaining the most favourable outcomes for patients.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: SICCR position statement

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic anal fistula. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. Surgery is the main treatment and several procedures have been developed, but the risks of recurrence and of impairment of continence still seem to be an unresolved issue. This statement reviews the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Fistula-In-Ano

This article explains the pathogenesis of fistula-in-ano and details the different classifications of fistula encountered, describe their features on MR imaging, and explains how imaging influences subsequent surgical treatment and ultimate clinical outcome. Precise preoperative characterization of the anatomic course of the fistula and all associated infection via MR imaging is critical for surgery to be most effective. MR imaging is the preeminent imaging modality used to answer pertinent surgical questions.

The Impact of the Outcome of Treating a High Anal Fistula by Using a Cutting Seton and Staged Fistulotomy on Saudi Arabian Patients

PURPOSE

A cutting seton is used after a partial distal fistulotomy to treat patients with a high exrasphincteric fistula in ano to avoid fecal incontinence and recurrence. In Saudi Arabia, religious practices necessitate complete cleanness, which makes conditions affecting anal continence a major concern to patients affected by an anal fistula. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the cutting seton in treating a high anal fistula among Saudi Arabians.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2014, a prospective study was done for 372 Saudi Arabian patients diagnosed as having a high anal fistula and treated with a cutting seton at Al-Ansar General Hospital, Medina, Saudi Arabia. 0-silk sutures were used. All patients underwent the same preoperative assessment, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up. Weekly, the seton was tightened in outpatient clinics.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-eight patients (80.1%) were males and 74 (19.9%) females. The duration of symptoms varied from 3-21 months. The fistula healed completely in 363 patients (97.6%); 58 patients (15.6%) reported some degree of incontinence to flatus, but none to feces. In 9 patients (2.4%) the fistula recurred.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of the cutting seton method in the treatment of patients with a high anal fistula is highly efficient as it simultaneously drains the abscess, cuts the fistulous tract, and causes fibrosis along the tract. Treatment of a high anal fistula by using a staged fistulotomy with a cutting seton was very rewarding to Saudi Arabian patients who feared anal incontinence for religious reasons and was associated with low postoperative complication and recurrence rates.

The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement - 2018

It is over 10 years since the first ACPGBI Position Statement on the management of anal fistula was published in 2007. This second edition is the result of scrutiny of the literature published during this time; it updates the original Position Statement and reviews the published evidence surrounding treatments for anal fistula that have been developed since the original publication.

Evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal fistula: a consensus statement developed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)

Perianal sepsis is a common condition ranging from acute abscess to chronic fistula formation. In most cases, the source is considered to be a non-specific cryptoglandular infection starting from the intersphincteric space. The key to successful treatment is the eradication of the primary track. As surgery may lead to a disturbance of continence, several sphincter-preserving techniques have been developed. This consensus statement examines the pertinent literature and provides evidence-based recommendations to improve individualized management of patients.

Identification of the internal anal opening and seton placement improves the outcome of deep postanal space abscess

AIM

This study aimed to determine if successful seton placement at the initial drainage procedure improves outcomes in the management of deep postanal space abscesses.

METHOD

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent initial drainage of a DPA space abscess between December 2002 and August 2010. A seton was placed through the internal opening if it could be identified.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients of median age 41 (21-64) years formed the study group. Twenty-four (75.0%) had a seton inserted at the initial drainage procedure. The patients underwent a total of 56 operations. The median interval from the initial to the final operation was 5 (2-18) months with 17 (70.8%) patients having the final operation within 6 months. In the 8 (25.0%) patients whose internal opening could not be found, 26 operations were required with a median interval from the initial to the final surgery of 11 (3-24) months. Patients who had a seton successfully inserted at drainage underwent significantly earlier definitive surgery and required fewer operations (P < 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Identification of an internal opening with placement of a seton at the initial drainage procedure is associated with earlier definitive surgery and fewer operations.

Proposal: a score to select patients for fistulotomy

Traditionally the distance between the inner opening and the anal verge is considered when making the decision to lay open an anal fistula or not. In contrast to this, the score presented here includes the distance to the upper border of the puborectalis muscle or to the external sphincter (anteriorly). In addition this score also takes various aspects of bowel function into consideration.

Anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano: evidence-based management

The management of anorectal abscess and anal fistula has changed markedly with time. Invasive methods with high resulting rates of incontinence have given way to sphincter-sparing methods that have a much lower associated morbidity. There has been an increase in reports in the medical literature describing the success rates of the varying methods of dealing with this condition. This article reviews the various methods of treatment and evidence supporting their use and explores advances that may lead to new therapies.

A anorectal fistula treatment with acellular extracellular matrix: A new technique

AIM: To investigate a new technique of the anorectal fistula treatment with acellular extracellular matrix (AEM).

METHODS: Thirty patients with anorectal fistula were treated with AEM. All fistula tracts and primary openings were identified using conventional fistula probe. All tracts were curetted with curet and irrigated with hydrogen peroxide and metronidazole. The AEM was pulled into the fistula tract from secondary to primary opening. The material was secured at the level of the primary opening. The excess AEM was trimmed at skin level at the secondary opening.

RESULTS: All of the 30 patients had successful closure of their fistula after a 7-14 d follow-up. The healing rate of anal fistula in treatment group was 100%. The ache time, healing time and anal deformation of treatment group were obviously superior to traditional surgical methods.

CONCLUSION: Using AEM anal fistula plug in treatment that causes the anorectal fistula is safe and successful in 100% of patients. It can reduce pain, shorten disease course and protect anal function.

Imaging of fistula in ano

Fistula in ano is a common condition that often recurs despite seemingly adequate surgery, usually because of infection that was missed at surgery. It is now increasingly recognized that preoperative imaging can help identify infection that would have otherwise gone unidentified. In particular, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings have been shown to influence surgery and markedly diminish the chance of recurrence; thus, preoperative imaging will become increasingly routine in the future. In this article, the authors describe the pathogenesis, classification, and imaging of fistula in ano, with an emphasis on MR imaging. Most important, the authors describe how the radiologist is well placed to answer the surgical riddles that must be solved for treatment to be effective.

Fístula anal de origen criptoglandular. Opciones terapéuticas

Anal fistula is a frequent condition. The most commonly accepted origin is infectious. The most widely used classification is based on cryptoglandular theory and on the position of the fistulous tract in relation to the anal sphincter. Physical examination will help to identify the type of fistula and allow its treatment to be planned. The most widely used complementary tests are endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. We review the various therapeutic options and their results, especially fistulotomy, endorectal advancement flap, use of sedal, anodermal advancement flap, sphincterorrhaphy with sphincter repair, and fibrin glue.

Value of hydrogen peroxide enhancement of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in fistula-in-ano

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound with that of hydrogen peroxide enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in diagnosing recurrent or complex fistula-in-ano.

METHODS

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound reconstructions were performed before and after hydrogen peroxide enhancement in 19 patients with suspected recurrent or complex fistula-in-ano. Two experienced observers derived a consensus fistula classification after a blinded random review of the data sets. The accuracy of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and that of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound were compared with a reference standard derived from surgical findings and magnetic resonance imaging and modified by outcome over a median follow-up of 13 months.

RESULTS

Patients had previously undergone a median of three fistula operations. Four had Crohn's disease. There were 21 internal openings and primary tracks in 19 patients: 1 superficial, 1 intersphincteric, 18 transsphincteric, and 1 extrasphincteric. Fourteen patients had 19 secondary tracks. Both techniques detected fistula tracks in 19 of 21 (90 percent) patients. There was no significant difference between three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in classifying internal openings (19/21 (90 percent) vs. 18/21 (86 percent)), primary tracks (17/21 (81 percent) vs. 15/21 (71 percent)), or secondary tracks (13/19 (68 percent) vs. 12/19 (63 percent)). Where three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound correctly detected an internal opening, gas from hydrogen peroxide enhancement was present in 8 of 18 (44 percent) studies. Similarly, gas made primary tracks more conspicuous in 6 of 19 (32 percent) and secondary tracks in 6 of 13 (46 percent) of those detected.

CONCLUSIONS

In recurrent or complex fistula-in-ano, endoanal ultrasound proved more accurate for detecting primary tracks and internal openings than for detecting extensions. Hydrogen peroxide improved conspicuity of some tracks and internal openings and so may be helpful in difficult cases, although no overall diagnostic benefit was demonstrated.

Long-term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula

Background

This study determined the long-term outcome after use of the loose-seton technique (LST) to eradicate complex fistula in ano.

Methods

Twenty patients whose complex fistula in ano was treated by the LST a minimum of 10 years previously were assessed by case-note review, supplemented where necessary by mailed and telephone interview.

Results

Eighteen patients had a trans-sphincteric and two a suprasphincteric fistula. There were seven supralevator and 12 ischiorectal secondary extensions. At short-term follow-up, a median of 6 months following seton removal, perianal sepsis had been eradicated in 13 of 20 patients. However, the long-term success rate of the LST was lower than that noted in the short term (four versus 13 of 20). Sixteen patients had persisting or recurrent sepsis, necessitating further surgery in 13. In the long term, external sphincter division was necessary to control sepsis in seven of the 20 patients compared with three of 20 patients at short-term follow-up. The rate of relapse in those with Crohn's disease and cryptoglandular fistula in ano was similar (five of six versus 11 of 14; P = 1·000). The fistula recurred in seven, 11 and 15 patients at 6, 15 and 60 months respectively after seton removal.

Conclusion

The success rate of the LST for complex fistula in ano falls over time. Counselling before seton removal should emphasize that, although most patients do not require sphincter division and some are cured by this technique, many patients develop further sepsis that usually requires surgery.